That what i alway,s said once u watch the original fire starter and u think of drewbarrymore for the part, infact i enjoyed devil boy but again it would of been better to have drew barrymore as first choice
It made no sense that Rainbird somehow survived the pyrokinetic attack from Charlie. I guess the creators were to lazy to think up another villian so they changed Charlie's past.
Oh, and those boys? Powers? So overrated -_- ...And what was with that horny kid who could control people's minds? Remember the scene where that one /nurse/ was speaking to the kid with the sunglasses?
At least in the first, it didn't seem as if /everyone/ had "special" abilities.
@dragonfly the clips weren't even close to the real movie or the original theatrical version ps she never killed her mom the people killed her but not by gunshot they tore her fingernails out and she bleed to death
@breswter dude she didnt bleed to death if you didnt notice the dad pulled a white cloth from her mouth--suffocation duh you need to pay attention-- they pulled the nails to torture her into telling where Charlie is
1984 is better because 1. drew barrymore and martin sheen and heather locklear were in it and 2. this looks sucky, they just care about making charlie mcgee really sexy
this movie doesn't have a lot to do with the original movie and this makes in my opinion a bad movie because it doesn't really make a lot of sense mostly the rainbird is not dead part
actually this movie is worth watching, even if it is just or the special effects. If the effects from this version of Firestarter where used in the original then the original would have been even more successful than it already is. BTW, anyone who critises this movie without watching it really needs their head looked at. Watch the movie and it will explain how rainbird was brought back etc
@Tempestras I hadnt' seen the original movie when this first came out so I liked it. I liked that it explained the past for those of us who hadn't seen the first movie or read the book, but I think the people who have seen the original probably wont like it. I get that way too about sequels to movies I loved, especially when the entire cast is different. So I can understand why loyalists of the original wouldn't like this movie. Makes me glad I saw this first so I could enjoy it.
Normally I'm one of the people who prefers the original (Grudge, The Ring etc) and I probably would if this was an actual remake. Instead, this is Charlie all grown up (and looking quite sexy too). All i was saying was that if the original would have had these special effects it would have been even more awesome, its already awesome as it is :)
This is a real shit... first of all, Charlie is blond with cute blue eyes, Rainbird is an Indian in the novel, not a white man as describe in the movie.
A lot of non sense, I would rather have had Drew on the casting...
Marguerite was on Queen Of The Damned. Therefore, she has been on two movies based on horror/scifi novels. Show a little respect. Drew couldn't act her way out of a paper bag.
Although the movie has an interesting idea (a girl with pyrokinisis), the actual movie turns out being awkwardly long and overall not showing Charlie's power enough. The end of the movie wasn't that different from the beginning. It was kind of...
This so called "firestarter2" has no goddamn logic. First of all Charlie McGee was blonde with blue eyes(drew barrymore didn't have blue eyes in the first movie but still...she was blonde). Second of all wtf is Rainbird looking here? Is he a zombie or something?
well not that i dont agree with you but possibly she changed her hair color and used contacts to change her eye color. and rainbird was killed in the last one. the second one didnt follow the previous storyline, even if it was made 18 years after the first one came out, they could have made it folloqw the storyline, and used actual flashbacks from the real firestarter not some fake version of it.
Reinberd died in the book, as well as in the original movie. I never watched this stupid piece of crap, and I never will. Too bad that all the great actors like Malcolm McDowell and Dennis Hopper must waste their time and talent for for such an stupid project.
Haven't seen this yet but I just finished the book, I'd love to see how they managed to bring back Rainbird when Charlie incinerated him right before her eyes. Then again maybe not.
I loved the origianl I saw this peice of shit when it came out on SCIFI it really sucked first off mistake one they didnt use Drew Barrymore 2 the story sucked 3 reinberg survives crappy actor that played him in the second movie god want a crappy fucking movie very disspointing I wanted to see a real story and this is what we got instead.
It says "based on the novel" it doesnt say this is an exact clone of the book. No ones saying SK wrote a sequel but im sure alot of people wanted to see Charlie as a woman
and no matter from what point in the movie you start watching, it is not much different, so you could watch from any point and not much changes until the very end. the movie is also not continuously engaging, it loses focus and doesn't show enough 'hot' scenes. ppft.
Fire + Lady = "really HOT"! The idea of fire being a woman's power adds to the sexual appeal. lol. however, the problem with the movie (rekindled) is that the plot has very similar scenes (like when Charlie and the guy limping on his foot walk out) repeat like 3 or 4 times, ....
It was way too long. And because of it - a little bit boring in some parts. But all in all Margerite Moureau and Malcolm McDowell have done a great job and they're the reasons to watch it!
Fucking pathetic.
Barbarapapa19 3 weeks ago
I have not seen this yet but I don't like the fact and mad about that they did not use the original Firestarter Drew Barrymore:/
TheJesusfreak2008 1 month ago
It's just corporate money grubbers doing what they do best, with no regard or care to keep anything consistent.
Fortunately they got what they usually get, a complete failure.
GlassDeviant 3 months ago
That what i alway,s said once u watch the original fire starter and u think of drewbarrymore for the part, infact i enjoyed devil boy but again it would of been better to have drew barrymore as first choice
mellydramaclub99 3 months ago
@mellydramaclub99 I think the movie still would've sucked. But everyone would be saying, "At least Drew Barrymore was in it". :)
tsntana 1 month ago
Leave it to Sci-fi to fuck up great Stephen King books and their charecter.-_-' Dill-holes.
JVcrow44 4 months ago
Didn't like this movie, sorry :/
It made no sense that Rainbird somehow survived the pyrokinetic attack from Charlie. I guess the creators were to lazy to think up another villian so they changed Charlie's past.
Oh, and those boys? Powers? So overrated -_- ...And what was with that horny kid who could control people's minds? Remember the scene where that one /nurse/ was speaking to the kid with the sunglasses?
At least in the first, it didn't seem as if /everyone/ had "special" abilities.
sluther6396 8 months ago
shes from mighty ducks she plays connie
NightOfDayUnleashed 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
sci-fi channel movies are so fucking cheap!
insanekillerpaparazi 1 year ago
this show was so fucking stupid
kirababy35 1 year ago
Sci fi original movies are not original... >:(
onda3 1 year ago
@dragonfly the clips weren't even close to the real movie or the original theatrical version ps she never killed her mom the people killed her but not by gunshot they tore her fingernails out and she bleed to death
breswter 1 year ago
@breswter dude she didnt bleed to death if you didnt notice the dad pulled a white cloth from her mouth--suffocation duh you need to pay attention-- they pulled the nails to torture her into telling where Charlie is
a1m9b9y7r 7 months ago
Hahaha what bullshit
gezkah 1 year ago
Marg i think you are beautifull,really beautifull,i keep thinking about you.
windyman007 2 years ago
Firestarter is better because of Drew Barrymore
Fryan13 2 years ago
1984 is better because 1. drew barrymore and martin sheen and heather locklear were in it and 2. this looks sucky, they just care about making charlie mcgee really sexy
shrooms85 2 years ago 2
this movie doesn't have a lot to do with the original movie and this makes in my opinion a bad movie because it doesn't really make a lot of sense mostly the rainbird is not dead part
kaneandlynch123456 2 years ago 8
I really don't care what the dealio is with this movie. It was okay, but nothing compared to the original. Plus M. Moreau is cool.
DEdge1221 3 years ago 3
i love this movie
Handschellengoth 3 years ago
movie??? isnt it a series?
razzp25 2 years ago
its a miniseries. In other words its just a really long movie shown over a period of a few nights.
DragonflyandTheWolf 2 years ago
This sounds like somthing worth watching, The whole Rainbirds not dead thing seems interesting, But, i would probly not watch it...
Lolmuffin123 3 years ago
actually this movie is worth watching, even if it is just or the special effects. If the effects from this version of Firestarter where used in the original then the original would have been even more successful than it already is. BTW, anyone who critises this movie without watching it really needs their head looked at. Watch the movie and it will explain how rainbird was brought back etc
Tempestras 3 years ago 3
@Tempestras I hadnt' seen the original movie when this first came out so I liked it. I liked that it explained the past for those of us who hadn't seen the first movie or read the book, but I think the people who have seen the original probably wont like it. I get that way too about sequels to movies I loved, especially when the entire cast is different. So I can understand why loyalists of the original wouldn't like this movie. Makes me glad I saw this first so I could enjoy it.
DragonflyandTheWolf 2 years ago
Normally I'm one of the people who prefers the original (Grudge, The Ring etc) and I probably would if this was an actual remake. Instead, this is Charlie all grown up (and looking quite sexy too). All i was saying was that if the original would have had these special effects it would have been even more awesome, its already awesome as it is :)
Tempestras 2 years ago
This is a real shit... first of all, Charlie is blond with cute blue eyes, Rainbird is an Indian in the novel, not a white man as describe in the movie.
A lot of non sense, I would rather have had Drew on the casting...
Zembrocal75 3 years ago 2
that girl's got nothing on drew barrymore.
Cutiequeen43 3 years ago 23
you're right, she probably doesnt know any of drew barrymore's secrets that she could later blackmail her with.
lazysoder2 3 years ago
@Cutiequeen43
Marguerite was on Queen Of The Damned. Therefore, she has been on two movies based on horror/scifi novels. Show a little respect. Drew couldn't act her way out of a paper bag.
Jemalacane 1 year ago
@Cutiequeen43 You're right, this actress's head is normal sized head and doesn't look like she was born with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.
OriginalNeomoon 1 year ago
Although the movie has an interesting idea (a girl with pyrokinisis), the actual movie turns out being awkwardly long and overall not showing Charlie's power enough. The end of the movie wasn't that different from the beginning. It was kind of...
TFWC88 3 years ago
This so called "firestarter2" has no goddamn logic. First of all Charlie McGee was blonde with blue eyes(drew barrymore didn't have blue eyes in the first movie but still...she was blonde). Second of all wtf is Rainbird looking here? Is he a zombie or something?
this Firestarter 2 is just nonsence
kaneandlynch123456 3 years ago 4
well not that i dont agree with you but possibly she changed her hair color and used contacts to change her eye color. and rainbird was killed in the last one. the second one didnt follow the previous storyline, even if it was made 18 years after the first one came out, they could have made it folloqw the storyline, and used actual flashbacks from the real firestarter not some fake version of it.
yinyang1530 3 years ago
u make the most sense -_- she was still being chased so she changed her hair color somewhat perminantly and wears brown contacts in rekindled
shadowoffear 3 years ago 2
it was actually a great film!
FayeChan01 3 years ago 4
Reinberd died in the book, as well as in the original movie. I never watched this stupid piece of crap, and I never will. Too bad that all the great actors like Malcolm McDowell and Dennis Hopper must waste their time and talent for for such an stupid project.
zhir78 3 years ago
Haven't seen this yet but I just finished the book, I'd love to see how they managed to bring back Rainbird when Charlie incinerated him right before her eyes. Then again maybe not.
NOTaTEAMplayer 3 years ago 4
I loved the origianl I saw this peice of shit when it came out on SCIFI it really sucked first off mistake one they didnt use Drew Barrymore 2 the story sucked 3 reinberg survives crappy actor that played him in the second movie god want a crappy fucking movie very disspointing I wanted to see a real story and this is what we got instead.
low budget peice of shit
dj2bklyn 3 years ago
i wanted to see this!
PuRpLe69MeDiUm 3 years ago
i8 WANA FUCK HER BRAINS OUT.
windyman007 3 years ago
Your dick would fall off.
coolblue14 3 years ago
Malcolm McDowell is a good actor
liquidsnakemi 3 years ago
lol, this looks realy bad, but i love the book firestarter
myface666 4 years ago
i know...this shit isn't worthy to be called "based on a novel by stephen king". he didn't even write a sequel, so dont make a sequel.
JrSoprano72 3 years ago
It says "based on the novel" it doesnt say this is an exact clone of the book. No ones saying SK wrote a sequel but im sure alot of people wanted to see Charlie as a woman
Tempestras 2 years ago 3
This show sucked.
BoyintheMachine 4 years ago
and no matter from what point in the movie you start watching, it is not much different, so you could watch from any point and not much changes until the very end. the movie is also not continuously engaging, it loses focus and doesn't show enough 'hot' scenes. ppft.
TFWC88 4 years ago
Fire + Lady = "really HOT"! The idea of fire being a woman's power adds to the sexual appeal. lol. however, the problem with the movie (rekindled) is that the plot has very similar scenes (like when Charlie and the guy limping on his foot walk out) repeat like 3 or 4 times, ....
TFWC88 4 years ago
i love how it say 'warmer...very hot'. lol
WitchBitch13 4 years ago 2
she is beautifull.
windyman007 4 years ago
wow she looks good.
windyman007 4 years ago
It was way too long. And because of it - a little bit boring in some parts. But all in all Margerite Moureau and Malcolm McDowell have done a great job and they're the reasons to watch it!
SeptemberIzzie 4 years ago 3
The one with Drew Barrymore is better.
daggettbeaverforever 4 years ago 5
Sweet!
jbene 4 years ago
I love this one and firestarter, :D love this trailer!!
PrueStar 5 years ago