The 5 Alaskans example is poor. If God does exist, then there actually is an answer to the question of why they were all there, because God ordained it to be so. The only reason why you would reject that as a possible answer to the question is if you've rejected the possibility of God. But that would mean that you had already rejected the conclusion of the argument before you'd even looked at the premises.
The 5 Alaskans example is poor. If God does exist, then there actually is an answer to the question of why they were all there, because God ordained it to be so. The only reason why you would reject that as a possible answer to the question is if you've rejected the possibility of God. But that would mean that you had already rejected the conclusion of the argument before you'd even looked at the premises.
Satarack 1 month ago