911 changed the world forever its unlikely peace will ever happen or ever possible. Too much resentment, religious furor, spiritual degragation. The beginning of the end....like McCain said there will be other wars
We should never have gone to Iraq, and definitely should leave now. There is nothing we have to gain by staying other than to make the global elitists richer and more powerful. What we have done is immoral and inexcusable.
The surge is working, Yah sure it is. That is why Iraqis still want to leave their country. That is why people still don't feel safe. That is why bombings and killing are still going on. But, the surge is working. Bush is a big liar.
US out of iraq NOW. We had no business going there and we have no business staying. We should pay these people millions in reparations for destabalizing their nation and lives and butt out of their affairs.
Very well done video! Things will get better. My advice is to start learning how to speak Russian. Russia may have an interest in oil as well. A war with the US in Iraq via special private armies might be profitable to Russia. They could also claim to be righting a wrong.
Matthappy420.. It worked for Hitler and that is a roll model for those people. Look into the family.. search "Jesus plus nothing"
Core ideas like rolling back all social programs and removing constitutional rights..
"The Family" calls Democracy ungodly. A group that takes no moral stand against child rape.. It forms cell like structures and speaks highly of dictators. Fellowship Foundation cell alone has an annual budget of $10 million.
Conservativism that Allows the Bush Regime to Spend More, racking up more DEBT then any President in History is a Mental Disorder. What happened to the Surpluses CLinton left US? completely gone. Our National DEBT under Bush Jr. is now $9,397,592,544,539.56 YAAHOOO!
The IRAQ WAR (REMEMBER THAT COUNTRY that DIDN'T ATTACK US yet we INVADED and OCCUPY?)
has Cost us at Least 3 TRILLION Dollars and now BUSH wants ANOTHER 3 TRILLION for his RICH ELITE BUDDIES. If Thats CONSERVING, then that's MADNESS.
President BILL CLINTON said Monday that the United States would PAY OFF $216 BILLION in DEBT this year, bringing to $355 BILLION the amount of the nation's debt paid down in the three years since the government BALANCED the BUDGET and began running SURPLUSES.Clinton said the $216 BILLION payment represented the largest DEBT PAYDOWN in American HISTORY. Under CLINTON the DEBT was $5.7 Trillion
The debt is way higher is you consider that they stole the social security money... something like 52 trillion as I hear.
Remember Gore talking about a "lock box" for social security? That's because it was being stolen, like if a company steals it's workers pensions... exactly like that.
There is,and never has been a "lock box" for social security..That money has been spent as part of the general funds since 1966..All you get when they take your social security "tax" out of your check is the promise that when you retire,you'll be given much more money then you ever put into it..That's why it's a scam..Nothing is stolen...It's taken,and spent in plain view..No big mystery
In 1935 S.S. became law. You say because since 1966 politicians have stolen money from it and that make "theft OK". Note by the gap in time that it was to be a fund like a pension.
If not "stolen" why the lies and cover up? Look at the difference between what is claimed to be the debt and what it is. It's crime and one way politicians make millions in gifts. Bush mentioned we need to get rid of SS because "we spent it" haha lol.
Is there a difference between a politician and the mafia?
Al qaeda are a bunch of devil worshipers. Unfortunately for the people of Iraq Bush is also one evil and corrupt dude. Too bad in real life the good guys are not the ones in charge.
your right it is a relative term, which is why i don't like it when bush says we're the good guys and our enemies are evil doers. there are good people on both sides; but obviously the ones killing innocent people are not good and should be punished accordingly. that includes bush.
just because sadam was bad doesn't make bush good. in real life there's more than enough room for 2 villains. bush told the american public we were invading iraq because they had wmd's and were allied with al queda. both were false and he even admits that now. treasury secretary paul o'neill stated in a Time interview that bush and cheney were pushing for a pretext for war with iraq even before 9/11.
bush has also refused to sign a new anti-torture bill, has pitted the shiite minority against the sunni majority in iraq by creating a shiite controlled government that is complacent towards shiite death squads, and has put absolutely no thought into reconstruction efforts so that as of oct. 2006, bagdad avageraged 2.6 hours of electricity a day.
even though he didn't hold a gun and kill people himself, his decision to invade iraq without ANY reconstruction plan caused over 500,000 innocent iraqis to lose their lives. if someone invaded america and "accidentally" killed your family i don't think you'd be so quick to defend them. your family would still be dead and you'd probably be pretty mad.
honestly if you still believe he's a great guy after everything that's come to light about him nothing i say is going to change that so good luck. but the information is out there if you take the time to look for it. i voted for bush in 2001 but i've done my research and the more you know about what he's done the uglier it gets. sure he's no saddam or bin laden but that's setting the bar pretty low. it's a sad day when americans say at least our president's not as bad as sadam hussein.
just because sadam was bad doesn't make bush good. in real life there's more than enough room for 2 villains. bush told the american public we were invading iraq because they had wmd's and were allied with al queda. both were false and he even admits that now. treasury secretary paul o'neill stated in a Time interview that bush and cheney were pushing for a pretext for war with iraq even before 9/11.
personally i dont care about money all that much, i just dont want to scrape by. and i speak for alot of neocons. i do support israel and anyone that reads into what happens over there should. the only cloning that i would consider approving is Ronald Reagon. Leftist ideas bring about the fall of nations.
no communism is the opposite of republican. the republicans want small government, communism i believe wants the government to have everything and distribute evenly. both have never worked perfectly.
if you look at the republican and democratic parties without any bias then it is the demos that look communistic.
The people are saying "La Illahe IllAllah, Muhammaden Resulullah" meaning: There is no other God worthy of worship but God and Muhammad is his servant and messenger"
This video translates this as: There's only one God and America is the Enemy lollll. The real news are fake. This is so wrong.
This proves that "The Real News" are not trust worthy.
I'm an American (read: NOT A FUCKING GLOBALIST). So fuck everyone in the world who refuses to take the example that the U.S.A. has set for them to follow. Their lives would be MUCH better off.
"I can press when there needs to be pressed; I can hold hands when there needs to be -- hold hands." --George W. Bush, on how he can contribute to the Middle East peace process, Washington, D.C., Jan. 4, 2008
"I've heard he's been called Bush's POODLE. He's bigger than that." --George W. Bush, on former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, as quoted by the Sun newspaper, June 27, 2007
we use nukes on weaker countries? as i recall we havent used nukes on any people since WWII in Japan, and that was to save an estimated 1,000,000 american lives.
if you have nukes and you have any signs showing that you will use them we attack. that is why we are in Iraq, well that is why we went in. and that is why we will be fighting Iran, if it ever happens that will be the reason.
WMDs include more than just nukes. Hussein had, AND USED, chemical weapons on over 100,000 Kurds (HIS OWN PEOPLE). He had WMDs. We took them away from him and put a final end to his dictatorial oppression.
Shh, there are dozen of worst dictators. If you are only going to listen half of the time don't listen to the news at all, makes you sound like a whole idiot. You may not be to blame if you are only spoon fed half truths, but then again, you could change the channel, but since you won't - idiot! Try National Geographic, you trust them right? They have tons of world and US documentaries that will help you with your opinions - or - IDIOT. I'm betting on LAZY IDIOT talk show host follower drone.
We are NOT in IRAQ because he had Nukes or was trying to get them, the Weapons Inspectors said he didn't have them and wasn't close to getting them. We went into Iraq for Regime change and Israeli Strategic Interests and Oil.
we went in because we thought nukes were in there, the government thought there were wmds in iraq.
if we went in it for a regime change then why are we not out yet.
if we went in to help israel i think that is a legit reason.
if we went in for oil: then that didnt work at all. oil is pricy and iraq is slowed in production of it. OPEC made record prices for oil and we dont get any money from opec. plus i dont think that our president would sell lives for a few bucks when hes rich.
We didn't go in because we thought nukes were in there; we went in because of 'weapons of mass destruction'. WMDs include more than just nukes. Hussein had, AND USED, chemical weapons on over 100,000 Kurds (HIS OWN PEOPLE). He had WMDs. We whipped his ASS!
We didn't go in because we thought nukes were in there; we went in because of 'weapons of mass destruction'. WMDs include more than just nukes. Hussein had, AND USED, chemical weapons on over 100,000 Kurds (HIS OWN PEOPLE). He had WMDs. We whipped his ASS!
I hate GW Bush and all his stupid administration has done to the USA. He is the worst president that our country has every had and hopefully ever will. He has ruined the US domestically and internationally. He has mortgaged our children's future.
GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Condaleeza Rice are the some of the worst people on Earth. I can only hope that a) we know everything, b) we can undo what's they've done, and c) they reap what they sew.
If anything works, be assured that the Bush administrations handling of any asspect of Bush's war, they will FUCK IT UP!! Count on it. Bush/Cheney are traitors and should be hung.
Does anything ever change? Here we have a solution to backing the hell out of Iraq and we don't pay the citizen groups? Yet we'll pump billions into Halliburton, Brown and Root, et al.
I saw a good presentation that said we're really good at the Leviathan force, we suck at the systems administration tasks.
Let's see, al Queda takes her husband and son and beheads them and somehow it's our fault? Of course they are going after the people who stand up for themselves. The British did this to us 232 years ago. Should we have blamed George Washington and told him to go back to Virginia? (actually you probably would've)
Sadly most Americans are to blind to see the connection between the power structure and the banking structure. CNN, ABC, MSNBC, FOX, and their associated print media have convinced people to suspend their critical thinking skills.
Look how many people are distracted from the facts about Obama and Hillary by focusing on something as asinine as religion, race, and gender.
People claim to be above such things yet focus on it in an election--ignoring the war, corruption, and corporatism.
Cause our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for them already in a little thing called WW2 ya dipstick. And they fought for freedom themselves. How about we give Iraq a chance to do the same.
maybe sweden wont defend democracy and christianity? and i dont blindly suppport Israel, i fully support israel and their wars. we invade? no we protect countries from their corrupt people.
please name one country on earth that defends religious freedom and freedom in general and is stable that is better than the united states.
it is our job to protect, that is why we have hundreds of bases protecting different countries, even if they hate us.
Simply as that to know you are brainwashed with propaganda. SURELY: You have a tyrant president. CHINA INVADES TO TAKE HIM OUT. Would you HELP CHina rule your country? Im sure you will say no. Yet. from the IRAQI POINT OF VIEW< that is their situation, yet, you think they SHOULD HAPPILY DO, something you yourself in their place would NEVER DO? that makes sense to you? no way it could. anyway: AMERICANS invented the name al qaeda. No Arab had ever heard it before. We made it for that RICO trial
Really badly done propaganda. So, the people he grew up with, in his home town, are 'al qaeda'? ridiculous lie. He is PAID BY AMERICANS, to inform (shoot?) FELLOW IRAQIS, who want an Iraq government of Iraqis not American puppets? They paid him a visit? I BET! China conquers America: China pays YOU $10 day, to inform on AMERICANS, who want China out of America. Yeah, ID PAY YOU A VISIT MY TRAITOROUS FRIEND! There is a word for HELPING a FOREIGN ARMY, make YOUR government! Id blast ur ass
you got the situation backwards, nice try. China giving us $10 to inform on Americans would be like al Queda paying to inform on the good Iraqis so they can behead them. I don't think China is much into freedom and liberty. You can't just trade country names and leave it at that.
Seriously, if they hate us for our freedoms, then doesn't surrendering our freedoms for the sake of a sense of "security" mean that they are getting what they want, and have won?
Odd how the people most likely to say we are hated for our freedoms are the ones most willing to surrender them at a whim, yet the ones keenest to defend our liberties are the ones who do not believe we are attacked because of our liberties. Groupthinkers vs freethinkers, methinks!
The awakening would cost a fraction of the trillions we spend to kill. To spend pennies on the dollar to save face and leave Iraq would be "good" and thus I can't conceive our government doing that.
I don't think our government is able to do something good anymore. I think they would become ill at the thought of anything short of the extinction of all life on earth as their actions clearly show.
bush is not the antichrist. he's called "junior" his pater is called "magog". The antichrist will hail from rome. some say it will be the pope. I don't think so though it may be. If you want to point fingers for the antichrist, look to the vatican, the jesuit control over the vatican, and the rothschilds who are the owners of the federal reserve. They are paving the way for the rise of the antichrist. bush is just a tool for them.
it's funny you are blaming the same people, the true church, that created the information,revelations written by st. paul, that you are using to condem the very people who created it... perhaps you give the church too much credit, after all the Babylonian religion is alive and well within the ranks of the Illuminati
The 'Real' News Network? Is that like Fox's we're 'Fair and Balanced'? One things for sure these days; if you have to express your credibility in your title or slogan you're not very credible...
I beleive the reason that Baghdad has not intregated the CLC's into the army and police is because to the Shia gov. they are a pro-Sunni millita, and what the CLCs say that they are fighting al-Qa'ida, the gov sees them as usurping Bahgdad's authority.
Respectfully, What do you think of the situation? Having an opinion, be it right or wrong does not mean stupidity. At least there is interest and discussion, it is up to others as yourself who may be more informed to educate others on the facts. This is not an attack by the way.
really? i own 7 guns of different types. and my state recently passed a law making it easier to get guns. (concealed weapons) so what are you talking about? i think it would be ironic but where and what do you mean?
plus it is legal to carry weapons onto a place that has signs banning it, you might be asked to put them down and then you must. or if you work there you could get fired. but no charges can be filed against you. just an interesting tidbit.
i'm not going to argue with you about it. if you have not witnessed all the attempts to remove guns from the population and generally demonize guns over the past 25+ (and probably more) years you have been sleep walking. there might be some pro gun victories here and there but they can be erased very easily. most politicos would like you not to have any defenses at all.
Bush is sending $600 to me (borrowed money) -- BUT PAYING THESE PEOPLE IN IRAQ $3,600.00 PER YEAR NOT TO ATTACK OUR TROOPS (borrowed money) and THEY WILL BE DEMANDING EVEN MORE MONEY.
$10/day to fight in the trenches, and the US government won't pay them as agreed?
This, while Blackwater mercenaries earn >$1000/day each, to guard Iraqi government officials?
Perhaps the Awakening Councils / Concerned Local Citizens had the good sense to ask to be paid in Euro, since the CFR-sellout politicians and policy-wonks are destroying the dollar.
bring our brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, cousins, neighbors, and friends home where they belong. they've done more than enough and should be with their loved ones.
The only chance for that is if Ron Paul is elected. Obama, Clinton, and McCain are ALL members of the Council on Foreign Relations, and each surround themselves with advisers from the CFR. You will get the same policy no matter which of those three you vote for.
The only ones that AREN'T CFR-sellouts:
Ron Paul
Dennis Kucinich
Mike Gravel
Notice a pattern here, between those that are CFR-sellouts, and those that aren't, in terms of coverage by the MSM? That's because MSM owners are CFR, too.
well shit, they don't money, they don't have jobs, they don't have utilities, and then when they see us give them a job and not pay... what do you expect is gunna happen
hey im all for staying there. i just dont think that we should be paying the people that live there to fight. it is there country let them defend it (without any other motive).
plus its a war, mistakes happen. i dont blame soldiers if the accident is understandable.
once they show that they can defend themselves we will leave.
we actually enjoy watching soldiers die and spending 3 trillion on a war that over half of us dont want. and having every country in the world hate us. it is enjoyable, we get a kick out of it. you should try it some time.
i think it is a question of whether we can and if we want to pay. our economy is so-so and why should we send promised money to people who should be defending themselves without any needed motivation.
What a retard. In iraq you are allowed one AK and one 30-round magazine per family. And fuck if mohammed and his 9 brothers have 1 AK +30 bullets between them against an enemy using rockets, RPGs, heavy machineguns, and smallarms, how the fuck do you expect them to survive?
Thus you're a terrorist if you have more than one AK and clip and americans will lock you up.
And if you cooperate they will not pay you, and your anti-terrorist checkpoints will be bombed. I think you should leave now!
Your sight seankhn. Lets not forget they are armed now and trained. These people turn away from the American influence and go militant once again, every man woman and child in the region will suffer. We need to get out NOW!!
How short memories are. It was barely twenty years ago that the US government was funding and training a heroic resistance fighter by the name of Osama Bin Laden, to fight in Afghanistan against an Evil Empire, whom then turned on the US.
80,000 fighters is more than were paid to fight the Soviets. How many Osama Bin Laden's will we see rise from the current policy?
Blowback, anyone?
Don't expect salvation from Obama, Clinton, or McCain. They are ALL CFR sellouts. Ron Paul is our last hope.
hey i like ron paul and everything he stands for but there is no way he can win. if he had won a single state i would consider backing him for president. but that didnt happen, so i like a loyal american will be supporting mccain. dispite the fact i hate him. i agree with him a hell of alot more than i agree with hilary and obama.
hilary=bitch
obama=carismatic, yet i dont agree with him. if a democrat does get elected (probably will) then i hope it is him
John McCain is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and surrounds himself with CFR-member advisers EXACTLY as Obama and Clinton do. You will get the SAME policies regardless of which of the 3 you elect. The Bilderberg Group, and their US foreign policy arm, the CFR, and their MSM lackeys, have worked to shut Dr Paul out. To acquiesce to their treasonous wishes, and vote for one of their ordained candidates, and expect difference, is pure folly.
i care more about other issues than our foriegn diplomacy. and i dont agree with the liberal views on those issues. if a "republican" stands a chance (mccain) then i will support him.
believe me i like ron paul, but he stands no chance and mccain is kinda along my conscience. well kinda, not really.
Ron Paul is running on the SAME foreign policy George W Bush ran on to get elected in 2000. Is GWB liberal? McCain could just as easily be called a Dem
You *should* care about foreign policy because this interventionism is bankrupting us. Iraq and Afghanistan will cost $3 TRILLION, and general foreign policy (ie >750 bases in 130 countries) costs us $1 TRILLION per year. Imagine if those dollars were flowing through the DOMESTIC economy! Our DOMESTIC agenda is lost because of our FOREIGN agenda
i call mccain a moderate, he is pro-life, well sort of. and he stands for some more conservative ideas so if he is the nominee (he is) i will support him, dispite the fact i DONT agree with him on ALOT of issues.
and if ron paul is running the same foreign policy GWB ran then that might not get alot of votes, ya see alot of people dont like him. i dont think is the best for the job, but better than most, especially kerry or gore.
provbaseball- GWB *NEVER* enacted the non-interventionist "humble" foreign policy he ran on. From Day 1, he went against the platform he ran on. It is THAT *enacted* policy that he is hated for. Everyone liked his foreign policy that he *said* he'd run on. That's the difference between GWB and Dr Paul: GWB lies to get into power, and changes once in; Dr Paul has promoted consistent policies for 40 years, and *WILL* enact the platform he runs on.
Ron Paul isn't going to wave a magic wand and make all the worlds problems go away...In fact he seems more bent on a path of isolationism (worked great pre-WWII the depression must have been a great time to live through)...
If Ron Paul could abolish the Fed, many of the world's problems *WOULD* go away! Put that with a non-interventionist foreign policy, and BAMM! Peace on earth!
And unless you're just being a pathetic troll, and you *do* know the difference, you need to educate yourself on the difference between isolationism (NOT Ron Paul's policy), and non-interventionism (Ron Paul's policy). It's isolationist to levy sanctions on countries, attack them, and to make yourself the most hated country in the world.
The US has NEVER had isolationist foreign policy. We invaded dozens of countries prior to WWI. Read, 'War Is A Racket' by Maj Gen Smedley Butler, USMC - 2 time Congressional Medal of Honor winner. In the book, which was written in the mid 1930s, he'll tell you all about how he was nothing but a thug for corporate America. How he pacified Nicaragua for Dole, China for US oil, Haiti, Phillipeans, Hawaii, Mexico, Honduras, Guatamala, Puerto Rico etc. We've been an empire from day 1.
☻/
/▌
/ \
This is Bob! Copy and paste and he will soon take over the Youtube
greenguy415 2 years ago
911 changed the world forever its unlikely peace will ever happen or ever possible. Too much resentment, religious furor, spiritual degragation. The beginning of the end....like McCain said there will be other wars
debaucheryBotched 3 years ago
they gotta incorporate them into the Iraqi regular army with real cntracts and payrolls
berlinbleibthart46 3 years ago
We should never have gone to Iraq, and definitely should leave now. There is nothing we have to gain by staying other than to make the global elitists richer and more powerful. What we have done is immoral and inexcusable.
ATLANTABURNING 3 years ago 3
The surge is working, Yah sure it is. That is why Iraqis still want to leave their country. That is why people still don't feel safe. That is why bombings and killing are still going on. But, the surge is working. Bush is a big liar.
jfazeli 3 years ago 2
US out of iraq NOW. We had no business going there and we have no business staying. We should pay these people millions in reparations for destabalizing their nation and lives and butt out of their affairs.
deadsnoopy1 3 years ago 3
Ya'll better keep on keeping on.
gman2152 3 years ago
My heart goes out to those people. Especially that lady and all those like her.
sledger132 3 years ago
Very well done video! Things will get better. My advice is to start learning how to speak Russian. Russia may have an interest in oil as well. A war with the US in Iraq via special private armies might be profitable to Russia. They could also claim to be righting a wrong.
MacNutt03103 3 years ago
so much war
bobmarlymeister 3 years ago
Everywhere around the world people get more truth than here in America.
Bush is building a country of stupid people, misinformed and stupid.
We are not the example to the world we used to be, definately not a super power anymore.
With all our troops overseas doesn't that make us weaker..
No one here at home except the sheep.
Bush needs his sheepeople, can't have a farm without the animals.
Stop being a animal!
Matthappy420 3 years ago 4
Matthappy420.. It worked for Hitler and that is a roll model for those people. Look into the family.. search "Jesus plus nothing"
Core ideas like rolling back all social programs and removing constitutional rights..
"The Family" calls Democracy ungodly. A group that takes no moral stand against child rape.. It forms cell like structures and speaks highly of dictators. Fellowship Foundation cell alone has an annual budget of $10 million.
I say "cell" as in how terrorism is described.
abram730 3 years ago
Conservativism that Allows the Bush Regime to Spend More, racking up more DEBT then any President in History is a Mental Disorder. What happened to the Surpluses CLinton left US? completely gone. Our National DEBT under Bush Jr. is now $9,397,592,544,539.56 YAAHOOO!
The IRAQ WAR (REMEMBER THAT COUNTRY that DIDN'T ATTACK US yet we INVADED and OCCUPY?)
has Cost us at Least 3 TRILLION Dollars and now BUSH wants ANOTHER 3 TRILLION for his RICH ELITE BUDDIES. If Thats CONSERVING, then that's MADNESS.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
Clinton announces RECORD payment on NATIONAL DEBT
May 1, 2000 CNN
President BILL CLINTON said Monday that the United States would PAY OFF $216 BILLION in DEBT this year, bringing to $355 BILLION the amount of the nation's debt paid down in the three years since the government BALANCED the BUDGET and began running SURPLUSES.Clinton said the $216 BILLION payment represented the largest DEBT PAYDOWN in American HISTORY. Under CLINTON the DEBT was $5.7 Trillion
Fucking NeoCONS
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
The debt is way higher is you consider that they stole the social security money... something like 52 trillion as I hear.
Remember Gore talking about a "lock box" for social security? That's because it was being stolen, like if a company steals it's workers pensions... exactly like that.
abram730 3 years ago
There is,and never has been a "lock box" for social security..That money has been spent as part of the general funds since 1966..All you get when they take your social security "tax" out of your check is the promise that when you retire,you'll be given much more money then you ever put into it..That's why it's a scam..Nothing is stolen...It's taken,and spent in plain view..No big mystery
rangerdgd1 3 years ago
In 1935 S.S. became law. You say because since 1966 politicians have stolen money from it and that make "theft OK". Note by the gap in time that it was to be a fund like a pension.
If not "stolen" why the lies and cover up? Look at the difference between what is claimed to be the debt and what it is. It's crime and one way politicians make millions in gifts. Bush mentioned we need to get rid of SS because "we spent it" haha lol.
Is there a difference between a politician and the mafia?
abram730 3 years ago
Al qaeda are a bunch of devil worshipers. Unfortunately for the people of Iraq Bush is also one evil and corrupt dude. Too bad in real life the good guys are not the ones in charge.
wei2k 3 years ago
define good guys, that is a relative term.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
your right it is a relative term, which is why i don't like it when bush says we're the good guys and our enemies are evil doers. there are good people on both sides; but obviously the ones killing innocent people are not good and should be punished accordingly. that includes bush.
wei2k 3 years ago
bush kills innocent people. i hope you can back that up with evidence besides these items
friendly fire
accidental shootings
bombs aimed at high officials that hit civilians too
also i would like to remind you of what you said
"the ones killing innocent people are not good and should be punished accordingly"
that includes Sadam Hussein and his reign of terror, so that justifies removing him, and saving people from terrorists justifies staying.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
just because sadam was bad doesn't make bush good. in real life there's more than enough room for 2 villains. bush told the american public we were invading iraq because they had wmd's and were allied with al queda. both were false and he even admits that now. treasury secretary paul o'neill stated in a Time interview that bush and cheney were pushing for a pretext for war with iraq even before 9/11.
wei2k 3 years ago
bush has also refused to sign a new anti-torture bill, has pitted the shiite minority against the sunni majority in iraq by creating a shiite controlled government that is complacent towards shiite death squads, and has put absolutely no thought into reconstruction efforts so that as of oct. 2006, bagdad avageraged 2.6 hours of electricity a day.
wei2k 3 years ago
even though he didn't hold a gun and kill people himself, his decision to invade iraq without ANY reconstruction plan caused over 500,000 innocent iraqis to lose their lives. if someone invaded america and "accidentally" killed your family i don't think you'd be so quick to defend them. your family would still be dead and you'd probably be pretty mad.
wei2k 3 years ago
honestly if you still believe he's a great guy after everything that's come to light about him nothing i say is going to change that so good luck. but the information is out there if you take the time to look for it. i voted for bush in 2001 but i've done my research and the more you know about what he's done the uglier it gets. sure he's no saddam or bin laden but that's setting the bar pretty low. it's a sad day when americans say at least our president's not as bad as sadam hussein.
wei2k 3 years ago
sorry youtube's posting system is acting up so these are meant to be read from the bottom up. my 2 cents on the whole issue.
wei2k 3 years ago
just because sadam was bad doesn't make bush good. in real life there's more than enough room for 2 villains. bush told the american public we were invading iraq because they had wmd's and were allied with al queda. both were false and he even admits that now. treasury secretary paul o'neill stated in a Time interview that bush and cheney were pushing for a pretext for war with iraq even before 9/11.
wei2k 3 years ago
You'll Never see these type of news on CNN< BBC<I won't even mention FOX (sorry excuse for journalism).
xShariNgaN01x 3 years ago
Neocons and their Puppets are a Joke, all they care about is Money and Israel.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
personally i dont care about money all that much, i just dont want to scrape by. and i speak for alot of neocons. i do support israel and anyone that reads into what happens over there should. the only cloning that i would consider approving is Ronald Reagon. Leftist ideas bring about the fall of nations.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
communism was republican in a socialist wrapper. The flags are all red and they are republics, without the democratic part...
Go take a bath in blood and pray to your horned master neocon.
abram730 3 years ago
no communism is the opposite of republican. the republicans want small government, communism i believe wants the government to have everything and distribute evenly. both have never worked perfectly.
if you look at the republican and democratic parties without any bias then it is the demos that look communistic.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
ZERO WMDS in IRAQ = ZERO
SADDAM HAD NOTHING to do WITH 9/11 = NOTHING
NONE OF THE 19 HIJACKERS THAT ATTACKED US on 9/11 were from AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, or IRAN = NONE
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
The people are saying "La Illahe IllAllah, Muhammaden Resulullah" meaning: There is no other God worthy of worship but God and Muhammad is his servant and messenger"
This video translates this as: There's only one God and America is the Enemy lollll. The real news are fake. This is so wrong.
This proves that "The Real News" are not trust worthy.
Graphicologyst 3 years ago
Hey if Graphicologyst is right;
WHAT THE HELL!?!?!
That's not just a simple Typo.
The entire story is shot because of this.
You need a better fact checker.
franknyt 3 years ago
fuck bin laden fuck alqaeda fuck all tererrist . god bless america.
rnzz0 3 years ago
man iraqi's don't get proper info. their news etc must suck, controlled.
wasy35 3 years ago
You need to get some facts outside of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, there's a whole World out there to see.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
I'm an American (read: NOT A FUCKING GLOBALIST). So fuck everyone in the world who refuses to take the example that the U.S.A. has set for them to follow. Their lives would be MUCH better off.
aivilik 3 years ago
What example is that? Attacking and Invading weaker Countries that have done nothing to US? That's one Hell of an Example.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
"I can press when there needs to be pressed; I can hold hands when there needs to be -- hold hands." --George W. Bush, on how he can contribute to the Middle East peace process, Washington, D.C., Jan. 4, 2008
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
"My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush, The Decider, Lancaster, Pa., Oct. 3, 2007
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
"I've heard he's been called Bush's POODLE. He's bigger than that." --George W. Bush, on former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, as quoted by the Sun newspaper, June 27, 2007
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
ZERO WMDS. ZERO
SADDAM had NOTHING to do with 9/11. NOTHING
NONE of the 9/11 Hijackers were from AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, or IRAN. NONE.
The U.S. has WMDs and we USE them on smaller weaker Countries all the Time, but if you have NUKES we LEAVE ya ALONE.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
we use nukes on weaker countries? as i recall we havent used nukes on any people since WWII in Japan, and that was to save an estimated 1,000,000 american lives.
if you have nukes and you have any signs showing that you will use them we attack. that is why we are in Iraq, well that is why we went in. and that is why we will be fighting Iran, if it ever happens that will be the reason.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
Nukes aren't the only WMDs, theres depleted Uranium Shells and a whole host of nasty weapons available to the US.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
WMDs include more than just nukes. Hussein had, AND USED, chemical weapons on over 100,000 Kurds (HIS OWN PEOPLE). He had WMDs. We took them away from him and put a final end to his dictatorial oppression.
aivilik 3 years ago
Shh, there are dozen of worst dictators. If you are only going to listen half of the time don't listen to the news at all, makes you sound like a whole idiot. You may not be to blame if you are only spoon fed half truths, but then again, you could change the channel, but since you won't - idiot! Try National Geographic, you trust them right? They have tons of world and US documentaries that will help you with your opinions - or - IDIOT. I'm betting on LAZY IDIOT talk show host follower drone.
franknyt 3 years ago
i agree thanks for that point.
dont forget the rape rooms we found.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
We are NOT in IRAQ because he had Nukes or was trying to get them, the Weapons Inspectors said he didn't have them and wasn't close to getting them. We went into Iraq for Regime change and Israeli Strategic Interests and Oil.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
we went in because we thought nukes were in there, the government thought there were wmds in iraq.
if we went in it for a regime change then why are we not out yet.
if we went in to help israel i think that is a legit reason.
if we went in for oil: then that didnt work at all. oil is pricy and iraq is slowed in production of it. OPEC made record prices for oil and we dont get any money from opec. plus i dont think that our president would sell lives for a few bucks when hes rich.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
We didn't go in because we thought nukes were in there; we went in because of 'weapons of mass destruction'. WMDs include more than just nukes. Hussein had, AND USED, chemical weapons on over 100,000 Kurds (HIS OWN PEOPLE). He had WMDs. We whipped his ASS!
aivilik 3 years ago
sorry my bad forgot that
i agree with you
provbaseball09 3 years ago
We didn't go in because we thought nukes were in there; we went in because of 'weapons of mass destruction'. WMDs include more than just nukes. Hussein had, AND USED, chemical weapons on over 100,000 Kurds (HIS OWN PEOPLE). He had WMDs. We whipped his ASS!
aivilik 3 years ago
in other words: accidental clusterfuck.
dyeah right.
CheeezMaster 3 years ago
I hate GW Bush and all his stupid administration has done to the USA. He is the worst president that our country has every had and hopefully ever will. He has ruined the US domestically and internationally. He has mortgaged our children's future.
GW Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Condaleeza Rice are the some of the worst people on Earth. I can only hope that a) we know everything, b) we can undo what's they've done, and c) they reap what they sew.
Fucking Republicans...
OmniLibrary 3 years ago
If anything works, be assured that the Bush administrations handling of any asspect of Bush's war, they will FUCK IT UP!! Count on it. Bush/Cheney are traitors and should be hung.
Townclownsunite 3 years ago
Does anything ever change? Here we have a solution to backing the hell out of Iraq and we don't pay the citizen groups? Yet we'll pump billions into Halliburton, Brown and Root, et al.
I saw a good presentation that said we're really good at the Leviathan force, we suck at the systems administration tasks.
kd1s 3 years ago
"Let's see, al Queda takes her husband and son and beheads them and somehow it's our fault?"
simple answer : Yes, it is.
Before US-invasion no "al quaida" in Iraq.
After a invasion, the security of civilians is the occupying force. In the case of Iraq
it is the USA. If the occupier shirks its duties to provide basic security, it´s determined as a war crime.
That´s international law.
truthspeaker2000 3 years ago
Let's see, al Queda takes her husband and son and beheads them and somehow it's our fault? Of course they are going after the people who stand up for themselves. The British did this to us 232 years ago. Should we have blamed George Washington and told him to go back to Virginia? (actually you probably would've)
firejack007 3 years ago
Maybe they should pay them in gold
Aiursrage2k 3 years ago
"Maybe they should pay them in "
€ would also be o.k. I guess :)
truthspeaker2000 3 years ago
50 Years of US Super power, was based on fake paper money, Time for Americans to work for their own goods and services has come.
Just think for a moment,
How it would have been possible to deploy forces to propagate NWO or WTO agenda?
Alqaida is sand toy story nothing to worry about.
NWO will come falling down on the day of US Paper money getting refused in future buying contracts including for Oil.
So simple is that.
Fixhist 3 years ago
Sadly most Americans are to blind to see the connection between the power structure and the banking structure. CNN, ABC, MSNBC, FOX, and their associated print media have convinced people to suspend their critical thinking skills.
Look how many people are distracted from the facts about Obama and Hillary by focusing on something as asinine as religion, race, and gender.
People claim to be above such things yet focus on it in an election--ignoring the war, corruption, and corporatism.
TurboLoveTrain 3 years ago
Why don't they attack Sweden? Sweden is a Rich, free country and yet no terrorism, I wonder why.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
Because Sweden is not a top 10 oil producing country but Venezuela and Iran are.
websuspect 3 years ago
Cause our fathers and grandfathers fought and died for them already in a little thing called WW2 ya dipstick. And they fought for freedom themselves. How about we give Iraq a chance to do the same.
firejack007 3 years ago
You jackasses, the reason given for the ATTACKS on US was that they hate our "FREEDOM" and the fact that we're "RICH". Man you guys are dumb.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
That's why I said "Then why don't they ATTACK SWEDEN? Sweden is Rich and Free, yet no Terrorist Attacks like 9/11."
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
because sweden doesnt go to other countries to protect them from the terrorists. that is why they attack us.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
Maybe because Sweden doesn't Blindly support Israel, or Run around the World Invading Weaker Countries. Just an Educated guess.
USSLIBERTY1 3 years ago
maybe sweden wont defend democracy and christianity? and i dont blindly suppport Israel, i fully support israel and their wars. we invade? no we protect countries from their corrupt people.
please name one country on earth that defends religious freedom and freedom in general and is stable that is better than the united states.
it is our job to protect, that is why we have hundreds of bases protecting different countries, even if they hate us.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
Al Quaida is (mostly) a fraud.
The "masterminds" are from CIA, MI5, SAS, ISI, Mossad and so on
truthspeaker2000 3 years ago
America funded Osama to fight the Russians. We gave him stinger missiles, money, and other supplies.
TurboLoveTrain 3 years ago
Simply as that to know you are brainwashed with propaganda. SURELY: You have a tyrant president. CHINA INVADES TO TAKE HIM OUT. Would you HELP CHina rule your country? Im sure you will say no. Yet. from the IRAQI POINT OF VIEW< that is their situation, yet, you think they SHOULD HAPPILY DO, something you yourself in their place would NEVER DO? that makes sense to you? no way it could. anyway: AMERICANS invented the name al qaeda. No Arab had ever heard it before. We made it for that RICO trial
Fastillion 3 years ago 2
Really badly done propaganda. So, the people he grew up with, in his home town, are 'al qaeda'? ridiculous lie. He is PAID BY AMERICANS, to inform (shoot?) FELLOW IRAQIS, who want an Iraq government of Iraqis not American puppets? They paid him a visit? I BET! China conquers America: China pays YOU $10 day, to inform on AMERICANS, who want China out of America. Yeah, ID PAY YOU A VISIT MY TRAITOROUS FRIEND! There is a word for HELPING a FOREIGN ARMY, make YOUR government! Id blast ur ass
Fastillion 3 years ago
you got the situation backwards, nice try. China giving us $10 to inform on Americans would be like al Queda paying to inform on the good Iraqis so they can behead them. I don't think China is much into freedom and liberty. You can't just trade country names and leave it at that.
firejack007 3 years ago
Bush I bombed the crap out of their country.
Clinton bombed the crap out of their country.
Bush II bombed the crap out of their country.
What is wrong with these people? Why don't they love us?
dodsworthinrags 3 years ago 5
"They hate us for our freedoms" LOL!
Seriously, if they hate us for our freedoms, then doesn't surrendering our freedoms for the sake of a sense of "security" mean that they are getting what they want, and have won?
Odd how the people most likely to say we are hated for our freedoms are the ones most willing to surrender them at a whim, yet the ones keenest to defend our liberties are the ones who do not believe we are attacked because of our liberties. Groupthinkers vs freethinkers, methinks!
lastnymleft 3 years ago 2
I understand being discontent of not being paid.
But striking against us (Americans) is counter productive to their cause.
Really, just murdering hell-bound Al Qaida would be worth while for me at least.
But it is interesting to hear from an unbiased source that the surge isn't all its cracked up to be.
In any case, may God be on the side of all who fight for justice and peace.
wumbovii 3 years ago
The awakening would cost a fraction of the trillions we spend to kill. To spend pennies on the dollar to save face and leave Iraq would be "good" and thus I can't conceive our government doing that.
I don't think our government is able to do something good anymore. I think they would become ill at the thought of anything short of the extinction of all life on earth as their actions clearly show.
abram730 3 years ago
Those Iraqis can't get a break - very sad.
Olphus 3 years ago
hey they lost their jobs..
now their true americans
bet some chinese or indian guy is doing the security council via telecom for 4cents a day
NerosLogic 3 years ago
Some of you people need to read up on the Council on Foreign Relations.
You use CFR as if it were a given that this is a bad thing. Childish effort at best to discredit the CFR. Who do you expect to impress?
The only people I know of who have a legitimate bitch about the CFR are the communists. It DOES work against communism.
TAMARLANE 3 years ago
Bush stop using our Tax dollars to pay people who have killed our troops you stupid moron!
ffirb 3 years ago
1) YOU supported Osama and now he against you
2) YOU supported Saddam and later he was against you
3) Now you are supporting the Iraqis and believe me they will be against you soon. they would not accept you as a legal occupiers.
Tereeb 3 years ago
We funded the 911 attacks so why would think this is new?
Actually this is different as this was an "Awakening".
Bush is only excited by "sacrifices"... I doubt we'll stop funding the insurgency in favor of something "good".
The government sees more personal profit in the 3 trillion dollar war effort against one dead cave man and a fictional Al-Qaeda.
abram730 3 years ago
There was no Al Qaeda in Iraq until Anti-Christ Bush invaded it!!! Fuck Bush!!! and his whole family!!!
rjshmo 3 years ago 4
bush is not the antichrist. he's called "junior" his pater is called "magog". The antichrist will hail from rome. some say it will be the pope. I don't think so though it may be. If you want to point fingers for the antichrist, look to the vatican, the jesuit control over the vatican, and the rothschilds who are the owners of the federal reserve. They are paving the way for the rise of the antichrist. bush is just a tool for them.
Google: leo Zagami
he will tell you who did 911.
Cantwetalk 3 years ago
it's funny you are blaming the same people, the true church, that created the information,revelations written by st. paul, that you are using to condem the very people who created it... perhaps you give the church too much credit, after all the Babylonian religion is alive and well within the ranks of the Illuminati
cuchulain25 3 years ago
The 'Real' News Network? Is that like Fox's we're 'Fair and Balanced'? One things for sure these days; if you have to express your credibility in your title or slogan you're not very credible...
jasonlajoie 3 years ago
The people at The Independant must be shaking in their boots.
MarquisdeBarrabas 3 years ago
this footage is taken from a channel 4 documentary called Hidden Iraq - check it out here - watch?v=vVQoGKD2gA4
qillaq786 3 years ago
I beleive the reason that Baghdad has not intregated the CLC's into the army and police is because to the Shia gov. they are a pro-Sunni millita, and what the CLCs say that they are fighting al-Qa'ida, the gov sees them as usurping Bahgdad's authority.
abarzilai664 3 years ago
Man, reading through these posts.. there are some seriously misinformed people.
Please be sure you know what you are talking about before making a post. You just make yourself look stupid.
MentalMuse 3 years ago
What are you saying MentalMouse???
slammah2012 3 years ago
mental muse@
Respectfully, What do you think of the situation? Having an opinion, be it right or wrong does not mean stupidity. At least there is interest and discussion, it is up to others as yourself who may be more informed to educate others on the facts. This is not an attack by the way.
sjsc76 3 years ago
Use the little guy to get results,then refuse to give compensation or respect. It's the New American Century.
savageUSA 3 years ago 4
arm and organize the locals abroad yet disarm the locals at home. talk about irony ;)
turkeyjurker 3 years ago 2
really? i own 7 guns of different types. and my state recently passed a law making it easier to get guns. (concealed weapons) so what are you talking about? i think it would be ironic but where and what do you mean?
plus it is legal to carry weapons onto a place that has signs banning it, you might be asked to put them down and then you must. or if you work there you could get fired. but no charges can be filed against you. just an interesting tidbit.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
i'm not going to argue with you about it. if you have not witnessed all the attempts to remove guns from the population and generally demonize guns over the past 25+ (and probably more) years you have been sleep walking. there might be some pro gun victories here and there but they can be erased very easily. most politicos would like you not to have any defenses at all.
turkeyjurker 3 years ago
Bush is sending $600 to me (borrowed money) -- BUT PAYING THESE PEOPLE IN IRAQ $3,600.00 PER YEAR NOT TO ATTACK OUR TROOPS (borrowed money) and THEY WILL BE DEMANDING EVEN MORE MONEY.
Something is bad wrong with this picture.
BRING OUR TROOPS HOME -- FROM A VETERAN.
DillonX 3 years ago 4
$10/day to fight in the trenches, and the US government won't pay them as agreed?
This, while Blackwater mercenaries earn >$1000/day each, to guard Iraqi government officials?
Perhaps the Awakening Councils / Concerned Local Citizens had the good sense to ask to be paid in Euro, since the CFR-sellout politicians and policy-wonks are destroying the dollar.
lastnymleft 3 years ago 2
Now that is fucking hard corp!
This guy is told to tech their way, insted he picks up a gun.
He will fight so that he can teach!
jclayton59466 3 years ago
So the one gentleman who wouldn't show his face spent $28K "on behalf" of the US? I hope he kept his receipts.
If these guys were smart, they'd have negotiated "cost-plus" agreements like every other government contractor.
jokertim777 3 years ago
McInsane is now paving the way for war with Iran by claiming Iran is training Al Qaida.
j0hnwi11iams 3 years ago
bring our brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, cousins, neighbors, and friends home where they belong. they've done more than enough and should be with their loved ones.
andy55512000 3 years ago
The only chance for that is if Ron Paul is elected. Obama, Clinton, and McCain are ALL members of the Council on Foreign Relations, and each surround themselves with advisers from the CFR. You will get the same policy no matter which of those three you vote for.
The only ones that AREN'T CFR-sellouts:
Ron Paul
Dennis Kucinich
Mike Gravel
Notice a pattern here, between those that are CFR-sellouts, and those that aren't, in terms of coverage by the MSM? That's because MSM owners are CFR, too.
lastnymleft 3 years ago
kill the extremist and remove the occupier the just stand with the freedom fighters of iraq you have just seen
beavisisgood87 3 years ago 2
If I only had 80,000 passports to the USA..
lyden2006 3 years ago
well shit, they don't money, they don't have jobs, they don't have utilities, and then when they see us give them a job and not pay... what do you expect is gunna happen
rockerpro 3 years ago 4
why did we promise them money that we cant pay? it is their country let them defend it themselves.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
''it is their country let them defend it themselves.''
okay then leave. and stop shooting at people ''by mistake.''
MementoExpose 3 years ago
hey im all for staying there. i just dont think that we should be paying the people that live there to fight. it is there country let them defend it (without any other motive).
plus its a war, mistakes happen. i dont blame soldiers if the accident is understandable.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
"Can't" pay?
I'll put money on Halliburton/KBR, and Blackwater never presenting bills that the US "Can't" pay.
lastnymleft 3 years ago 2
"why did we promise them money that we cant pay?"
It´s not a question of can or cannot, it´s
a question of want to, or not want to pay.
"... it is their country let them defend it themselves."
If it´s their coountry, you should feel free to leave it.
truthspeaker2000 3 years ago 3
once they show that they can defend themselves we will leave.
we actually enjoy watching soldiers die and spending 3 trillion on a war that over half of us dont want. and having every country in the world hate us. it is enjoyable, we get a kick out of it. you should try it some time.
i think it is a question of whether we can and if we want to pay. our economy is so-so and why should we send promised money to people who should be defending themselves without any needed motivation.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
What a retard. In iraq you are allowed one AK and one 30-round magazine per family. And fuck if mohammed and his 9 brothers have 1 AK +30 bullets between them against an enemy using rockets, RPGs, heavy machineguns, and smallarms, how the fuck do you expect them to survive?
Thus you're a terrorist if you have more than one AK and clip and americans will lock you up.
And if you cooperate they will not pay you, and your anti-terrorist checkpoints will be bombed. I think you should leave now!
01DOGG01 3 years ago
and, who would they be defending themselves against?
FattKidd 3 years ago
Your sight seankhn. Lets not forget they are armed now and trained. These people turn away from the American influence and go militant once again, every man woman and child in the region will suffer. We need to get out NOW!!
Boomer1949 3 years ago
How short memories are. It was barely twenty years ago that the US government was funding and training a heroic resistance fighter by the name of Osama Bin Laden, to fight in Afghanistan against an Evil Empire, whom then turned on the US.
80,000 fighters is more than were paid to fight the Soviets. How many Osama Bin Laden's will we see rise from the current policy?
Blowback, anyone?
Don't expect salvation from Obama, Clinton, or McCain. They are ALL CFR sellouts. Ron Paul is our last hope.
lastnymleft 3 years ago 2
hey i like ron paul and everything he stands for but there is no way he can win. if he had won a single state i would consider backing him for president. but that didnt happen, so i like a loyal american will be supporting mccain. dispite the fact i hate him. i agree with him a hell of alot more than i agree with hilary and obama.
hilary=bitch
obama=carismatic, yet i dont agree with him. if a democrat does get elected (probably will) then i hope it is him
provbaseball09 3 years ago
John McCain is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and surrounds himself with CFR-member advisers EXACTLY as Obama and Clinton do. You will get the SAME policies regardless of which of the 3 you elect. The Bilderberg Group, and their US foreign policy arm, the CFR, and their MSM lackeys, have worked to shut Dr Paul out. To acquiesce to their treasonous wishes, and vote for one of their ordained candidates, and expect difference, is pure folly.
It's NEVER wrong to vote your conscience.
lastnymleft 3 years ago
i care more about other issues than our foriegn diplomacy. and i dont agree with the liberal views on those issues. if a "republican" stands a chance (mccain) then i will support him.
believe me i like ron paul, but he stands no chance and mccain is kinda along my conscience. well kinda, not really.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
Ron Paul is running on the SAME foreign policy George W Bush ran on to get elected in 2000. Is GWB liberal? McCain could just as easily be called a Dem
You *should* care about foreign policy because this interventionism is bankrupting us. Iraq and Afghanistan will cost $3 TRILLION, and general foreign policy (ie >750 bases in 130 countries) costs us $1 TRILLION per year. Imagine if those dollars were flowing through the DOMESTIC economy! Our DOMESTIC agenda is lost because of our FOREIGN agenda
lastnymleft 3 years ago 8
i call mccain a moderate, he is pro-life, well sort of. and he stands for some more conservative ideas so if he is the nominee (he is) i will support him, dispite the fact i DONT agree with him on ALOT of issues.
and if ron paul is running the same foreign policy GWB ran then that might not get alot of votes, ya see alot of people dont like him. i dont think is the best for the job, but better than most, especially kerry or gore.
provbaseball09 3 years ago
provbaseball- GWB *NEVER* enacted the non-interventionist "humble" foreign policy he ran on. From Day 1, he went against the platform he ran on. It is THAT *enacted* policy that he is hated for. Everyone liked his foreign policy that he *said* he'd run on. That's the difference between GWB and Dr Paul: GWB lies to get into power, and changes once in; Dr Paul has promoted consistent policies for 40 years, and *WILL* enact the platform he runs on.
The CFR (Obama, Clinton, McCain) agenda is *EVIL*
lastnymleft 3 years ago 2
Ron Paul isn't going to wave a magic wand and make all the worlds problems go away...In fact he seems more bent on a path of isolationism (worked great pre-WWII the depression must have been a great time to live through)...
gandhigonewild65 3 years ago
If Ron Paul could abolish the Fed, many of the world's problems *WOULD* go away! Put that with a non-interventionist foreign policy, and BAMM! Peace on earth!
And unless you're just being a pathetic troll, and you *do* know the difference, you need to educate yourself on the difference between isolationism (NOT Ron Paul's policy), and non-interventionism (Ron Paul's policy). It's isolationist to levy sanctions on countries, attack them, and to make yourself the most hated country in the world.
lastnymleft 3 years ago 3
The US has NEVER had isolationist foreign policy. We invaded dozens of countries prior to WWI. Read, 'War Is A Racket' by Maj Gen Smedley Butler, USMC - 2 time Congressional Medal of Honor winner. In the book, which was written in the mid 1930s, he'll tell you all about how he was nothing but a thug for corporate America. How he pacified Nicaragua for Dole, China for US oil, Haiti, Phillipeans, Hawaii, Mexico, Honduras, Guatamala, Puerto Rico etc. We've been an empire from day 1.
FattKidd 3 years ago 2
Isn't this typical American foreign policy? First use their proxies, then disown them.
seankhn 3 years ago 10