For anyone that likes the Cruze, you should know it dominated in the WTCC. Most the races are on youtube if you look for'em. Great car, great price, great fun!
Cruze??? What about Elantra, much better. Cruze is from a company that has was bankrupted, who wants to drive a former bankrupted car??? Give me my tax money back!
@mikkalainer11 That's what Chevrolet is doing. Since they were bankrupt, these POS Daewoo brand is paying them to market their cars as new Chevrolets.
The track test results are very identical to the Hyundai Elantra's result.. And the fact, Honda civic Ex-L has a better track test result over the two..
alot of these cars now on the streets not bad looking car,cool too my best friends parents just bought his little brother a cruze ltz with the rs package,drove it and it drives way nicer than my girls 08 civic
@waltermarines89 I own a Chevrolet Cruze LT, 2.0cc Diesel with 150 hp. it makes 0-100 km/h in about 8.5-9 seconds. Top Speed is 220km/h+ (Unofficial of course ;)) ... a thing which I recently tested. It went beyond its limit (which is 220km/h), so my guess I went up to 230 km/h. It is NOT a fast car... but it isn't as slow as u think it is. Just wanted to give u some info =)
@pdavid24 the numbers they show here seem slow. I think i read in another magazine that got mch better times. Almost a second faster through the quarter mile. and you do need to remember, it's an economy car ;)
to all the knuckle heads posting negative bullpie about this car ...remember that this car is supposed to be an "ECONOMY CAR" GM Chevy never introed it as a performance compact ,and its a big compact at that, if you want performance numbers wait til Buick Comes out with their Verano version of this car; that will have the 2.0 liter turbo that the old cobalt SS had ,and Honda and the other competitors could not beat during its short run.
@yynotnnh Oh I'm sorry did I hurt your feelings?? Chevy has not lost their edge, they are making better cars what are you talking about Ricer? Engine and Transmission may be made else where but the design is from Chevy you wanker, maybe things sold here in the U.S. are made and assembled in other countries because they have cheap labor.
I feel this vehicle is made by daewoo like the aveo (more like replacement to suzuki forenza) I wonder if the Regal will be the new Cobalt replacement for gm
@badassxr50r yea the sonic but I mean at least that the 1.4 turbo will match performance per weight.. this is is lacking. it's good car and nice but I think they need to give it an SS turbo worthiness like the upcoming GS..
All I want is an American made car that hauls ass, gets atleast 35 mpg, has AWD(beacuse snow sucks) and I can haul my family in. GM, Dodge and Ford all have cars and technology capable of this, but instead we get this? WTF? Imagine Ford Fusion SVT EcoBoost. Dodge Avenger SRT6, Chevy Malibu SS Turbo.
Haha,the fastest stock cruze only sell in China!It's the 1.6 Turbo Cruze with 6MT.It's got 135KW and 266 Nm torque,0-60mph in 8s.even much better than the VW 1.8Turbo which just got 120kw and 235 nm's torque.
I think this is the Ecotec which I believe is direct injection. It has variable valve timing. Is it a direct injection exactly, or is it a psudo version of it?
wow this car is preety quiet and 66 mph through the slaom isn't bad at all, as a matter of fact its preety impressive for a small car thats focused more on efficency than performance. this car might be my first car, its cheap, fuel efficient, and refined. kudos to gm great job!
The front end look's already dated. It would of look great when they launched the Malibu like 5 year's ago. The 2011 Cruze looks like a 2006 model. How can GM expect to beat the imports with new designs that already look old and chunky.
The only thing Chevy had going for it with the Cavalier and Cobalt was that they were the fastest and most powerful cars stock in the Compact class, now they have taken that away with the Cruze.
@dieseldan420ca yea more than likely. Now Chevrolet has the Camaro V6 about the same price of a nicely equipped Cruze, it would not make any sense make it faster. I imagine the Cruze SS doing 6.5 - 7.5 0-60 MPH. Its just a guessed so dont quote me on that.
Very nice car...I'd say this is the best 'economical' car out there, but I'd opt for a bigger engine, I'd gladly give up 5mpg highway for something that gets to 60 in less than 8 seconds.
@onoff314 i wouldnt call thatb impressive at all and sometimes you need a little power to merge and a 10 sec 0 to 60 car doesnt have it so you always going to have people riding up on your ass like crazy.
Wow everyone is complaining about the poor performance from the turbo. IT'S A 1.4L TURBO WHAT DO YOU WANT? It's not made for breakneck acceleration, it's made for fuel efficiency.
@crammage It's a choice of a N/A 1.8L and the 1.4L Turbo. Both make about the same horsepower. The turbo makes a bit more torque (with a flatter curve) and gets better fuel economy. The 1.4T will be the volume engine.
@rudolphna54 That's the problem. There isn't enough differentiation between the 1.4 T and the 1.8 NA. They will provide essentially the exact same performance overall (save for straight-line performance). I think you'd be hardpressed to see a different lap time between the two "options"
Also, in addition, this is Chevy's competition against Toyota Corolla & Honda Civic. The Cruze is stepping up to the plate. GM had made the Cobalt and the Cruze, but did it cheaply, this Chevrolet wasn't competitive for it. Now with the Cruze and its features, it'll make Toyota and Honda sweat just a tad.
Slow but never made for performance, its made for people that want a nice small car to commute back and forth, with out the sacrifices of a traditional small car
@SoRealSoReal23 HALF?? Really?? I don't think so... More like 2/3 the time... HALF would be 4.7. No STOCK Cobalt SS does that on any planet, anywhere. More like 0-60 in 6.1 with a perfect driver, 6.5 with an average one...
@SoRealSoReal23 No bubble to burst here. I don't care how fast the Cobalt SS Supercharged can run, to be honest. I was just calling you on your comment and how inaccurate it was. I'd take a Cobalt SS turbocharged over the Supercharged anyday, BTW...
Thanks, InsideLine, for specifying which motor was equipped during this testing! Oh wait...you left that bit out. This is an extremely well built car that is so quiet inside it's ridiculous. It's not intended to be fast so all the haters please refrain from the silly comments. If they do an SS version of this car it will put the Speed3, GTI, WRX, and any other sporty econo cars to shame. This is unquestionably the nicest small car GM has ever produced and IMO nicest small car available in the US
@idiotfieldmouse HAHAHA to compete with the WRX, Ralliart, or MSP3?? dude even a shity lancer, impreza or mazda 3 could do a faster 0-60 run, an better than 17 sec on 1/4mile, for the same price and much better quality and resale value, for sure!
@EvoXfreak You aren't very good at reading are you? Obviously the Cruze used in this video would be waxed by any of your aforementioned cars. What I said, if you read carefully, was "If they do an SS version of this car." Meaning if they do a faster version of this car...you know..like the Cobalt SS...only a Cruze SS. And I only say it would put the competition to shame is because for once the interior on a GM small car is superior to the competition's offerings. Again, that is IF they do an SS
@idiotfieldmouse I was talking of a posible version of the SS compared to wrx ralli or mps3, I said even at the shitty versions, of your cruze and all the others, the cruze keeps being the worst choice.
@EvoXfreak How do you figure? The old (my current car) turbocharged Cobalt SS washed the floor with everyone of those cars in every performance category except for the WRX in a 1/4 mile run because they could launch the piss out of it, but the Cobalt had a higher trap speed. The only reason that every auto review company didn't put the Cobalt SS in first was because of the garbage interior. Now that the Cobalt's replacement has an improved interior, all it needs is a powerful drivetrain to win
People need to just calm down. Obviously this is not going to be a sporty car. It's meant for the daily consumer that needs a nice looking affordable and practical car. I am glad GM made this car, It gives me everything I need. 60-40 folding rear seats, power windows, great sitting room, 10 standard airbags, along with other things. Most often the sportiness of the car is never the selling point, because if you want a sports car you'd be buying your piece of shit mustangs. Thank you, and goodbye
@dagrome nice...lol. i judge cars compared to price and practicality and this car beats a lot of others in that proportion. im not a fan of chevy but this was a smart build for them. hopefully they can turn it around soon without the government aid. thank you, and keep cruzing. lol.
@pcfxer Weird how it doesn't have standard power mirrors or floor mats or trip meter or 10 airbags or as good gas mileage. It has no warranty for rust damage, and its bumper to bumper warranty is only 36000 miles.
@dagrome It does have std power mirrors, floor mats (in Canada) and a trip meter (in every part of the world...). The Sentra gets BETTER gas mileage for the majority consumer (automatic vs automatic [cvt]). It has corrosion warranty of 10 years/160, 000km and the CRUZE has only 3 yr /36000 miles BUMPER to BUMPER warranty as well. Where do you get your info? General Motors Propaganda?
@pcfxer I used Honda's site to compare so granted not all info might be correct, either way. The cvt auto gets the same gas mileage as the regular 1.4 liter turbo cruze city, but not for highway. Standard power mirrors and floor mats in Canada basically means that everyone else in the world has to pay for that extra shit. nissan also doesn't care about standard safety, you have to pay for abs and esc
@dagrome a regular civic EX has all that and is faster then this car and will last longer and will have a much higher price when/if u decide to sell it and its been around for a while now......
@ricksmiths10 I happen to own a Civic, i love how everyone assumes I must be a hardcore Chevy fan. I am not, I just think the Cruze is a really awesome car that I would love to own.
@GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 ur dumbass has obviously never owned a civic! civic's mpg rating r almost allways understated! my car according to epa gives 36 mpg on highway however when i take it on roadtrips it gives me 40+ on highway and i floor it alot in normal city driving and my car still manages 30-32 mpgs!.......get ur facts right before talking dumbass chevy boy! lol
@ricksmiths10 your a complete dumb fuck i had a 98 civic and it does give you good mileage but not vtec models(ex, si, etc.) you said you had an ex thats vtec those dont have high mpg fuckn dumbass fagboy get off hondas nuts
@GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 u would really know how good mpgs they give since u dont have one right? lol fucking idiot telling me how many mpgs my car gives me! i think u made it quiet obvious who is the "dumbass" over here.
@ricksmiths10 your a dumbass my friend had a 08 si his shit got garbage mpg 21 tops
and your over here telling your vtak gets more mpgs than a base civic model your a complete fuckn idiot you cant even prove your point you lame piece of dry shit
RS trim looks great but it's pretty slow.
avro206 3 weeks ago
What engine configuration is it?
Zinisster 1 month ago
For anyone that likes the Cruze, you should know it dominated in the WTCC. Most the races are on youtube if you look for'em. Great car, great price, great fun!
Jeredin13 2 months ago
@Jeredin13 it only dominated after all the other works teams had left
jemimallah 4 weeks ago
@jemimallah whatever helps you sleep at night . . .
Jeredin13 4 weeks ago
That slalom was pretty good.
TheMarlonsandifer 2 months ago
i'm getting this car for my 18th bithday. he arrives this week yeees!
phil75121 2 months ago
I got this car for my 16th birthday. Best present EVER.
SelenaL10 3 months ago
best compact/small car chevy ever made. For now Cruze is best compact car available interms of price, gas and look.
0077hass 3 months ago
Manual...
FrankRizzo762 3 months ago
Is the transmission of this car in this video is mechanical or automatic?
AlimsAdmir 3 months ago
Cruze??? What about Elantra, much better. Cruze is from a company that has was bankrupted, who wants to drive a former bankrupted car??? Give me my tax money back!
Tom15452 3 months ago
Don't buy this car....it's a rebadged Daewoo Nibura...I mean...c'mon...you wouldn't buy a Kia Rio in 2001, so why buy a Cruze in 2011?
talldude123 3 months ago
@talldude123 lol Kia Rio ROTFL! you have no idea what are you talking about! and it's Nubira not Nibura LOL!
mikkalainer11 3 months ago
@mikkalainer11 That's what Chevrolet is doing. Since they were bankrupt, these POS Daewoo brand is paying them to market their cars as new Chevrolets.
talldude123 3 months ago
@talldude123 Chevy owns Daewoo -___-
sexyboi142 1 month ago
@sexyboi142 GM owns Chevy and Daewoo.
Xandrez1122 1 month ago
@Xandrez1122 what are you tying to get at? I already know that.
sexyboi142 1 month ago
@sexyboi142 Exactly.
Xandrez1122 1 month ago
@talldude123 If you knew anything about the car's platform you would disagree
brooklynboiz 3 weeks ago
ecotech = vvti
warninshoarmy 3 months ago
CRUZE 1.8 ecotech 5 speed manual ; 5,189L/100km in city,5,900L/100km on highway
CRUZE 1.8 ecotech 6 speed automatic ; 5,800L/100km in city,6,500L/100km on highway
warninshoarmy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CRUZE 1.4 ecotech turbocharger 6 speed manual ; 5,200L/100km in city,8,300L/100km on highway
CRUZE 1.4 ecotech turbocharger 6 speed automatic ; 5,800L/100km in city,9,000L/100km on highway
warninshoarmy 3 months ago
CRUZE 1.4 ecotech turbocharger 6 speed manual ; 5,200L/100km in city,8,300L/100km on highway
CRUZE 1.4 ecotech turbocharger 6 speed automatic ; 5,800L/100km in city,9000L/100km on highway
warninshoarmy 3 months ago
The track test results are very identical to the Hyundai Elantra's result.. And the fact, Honda civic Ex-L has a better track test result over the two..
MrRyuzaki91 4 months ago
the 2008-present Chevrolet Cruze is assembled in
Brazil: São Caetano do Sul, São Paulo
China: Shenyang, Liaoning
India: Halol, Gujarat
Kazakhstan: Ust-Kamenogorsk
Russia: Saint Petersburg
Vietnam: Hanoi
South Korea: Gunsan, Jeonbuk
Thailand: Rayong
United States: Lordstown, Ohio
Annihilator1111 6 months ago 2
alot of these cars now on the streets not bad looking car,cool too my best friends parents just bought his little brother a cruze ltz with the rs package,drove it and it drives way nicer than my girls 08 civic
cAdillac718bx 6 months ago 2
@halo0009 no, u can get a 6-apeed automatic on the Eco, it's a $950 option. Now if u want to say a 6-speed manual is standard than u are correct.
KAGMVP7 7 months ago
perfeito esse teste gostei muito.
jonataslrvmt 7 months ago
@waltermarines89 I own a Chevrolet Cruze LT, 2.0cc Diesel with 150 hp. it makes 0-100 km/h in about 8.5-9 seconds. Top Speed is 220km/h+ (Unofficial of course ;)) ... a thing which I recently tested. It went beyond its limit (which is 220km/h), so my guess I went up to 230 km/h. It is NOT a fast car... but it isn't as slow as u think it is. Just wanted to give u some info =)
hahudrasesligesh 7 months ago
lul this car is slower then my 2002 sonata...no offense im just saying that's kinda sad.
pdavid24 7 months ago
@pdavid24 the numbers they show here seem slow. I think i read in another magazine that got mch better times. Almost a second faster through the quarter mile. and you do need to remember, it's an economy car ;)
tricnomistal 7 months ago
@pdavid24 does your sonata have a 1.4l motor? nope didnt think so,does your sonata get 50mpg hwy?,nope didnt think so
jakkaroo1 5 months ago
@cmattdabrat the ECO is also available with a 6 speed AUTOMATIC you idiot. Don't make smart comments when your incorrect
KAGMVP7 7 months ago
@KAGMVP7 CRUZE ECO is 6 speed manual only
halo0009 7 months ago
I thoguht this car also had a v6 engine with 280 horsepower just like Chrysler 200 !!!
tashtan1 7 months ago
@yynotnnh ALL of their ECO models are stick.
cmattdabrat 7 months ago
to all the knuckle heads posting negative bullpie about this car ...remember that this car is supposed to be an "ECONOMY CAR" GM Chevy never introed it as a performance compact ,and its a big compact at that, if you want performance numbers wait til Buick Comes out with their Verano version of this car; that will have the 2.0 liter turbo that the old cobalt SS had ,and Honda and the other competitors could not beat during its short run.
face it jap lovers the Giant has Awoken!!
chevretto93 8 months ago
damn!!!! this car is slow as fuck!!!!!
fredmagic09 8 months ago
@fredmagic09 Well it is built for Fuel economy not speed, if it was build for speed they would have gave it a bigger engine most likely a V6
chevroletfan17 8 months ago
For the idiot that thinks it was a huge recall it wrong and my friend as a civic and this will run over top of it
Canaan125 9 months ago
my mom gave me lamborgini on my 3rd bday i remeber:P
rameez51 9 months ago 2
this is the 2.0 163cv? Or it's the 150cv? :D
jefa1234 9 months ago
@jefa1234 1.4 T
mikkalainer11 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yynotnnh Sorry my friend, just got a brand new Cruze Eco, 1.4t with the 6 speed....
UglyBoost91 9 months ago
the solution for a turbo lag is heel & toe shifting
carterfrostblade 9 months ago
what a pointless video.
Asuram21 10 months ago
@yynotnnh Oh I'm sorry did I hurt your feelings?? Chevy has not lost their edge, they are making better cars what are you talking about Ricer? Engine and Transmission may be made else where but the design is from Chevy you wanker, maybe things sold here in the U.S. are made and assembled in other countries because they have cheap labor.
ZR1Terror 10 months ago
@yynotnnh Who cares it's just a Honda anyways, plus this one is newer, looks better and gives better mileage
ZR1Terror 10 months ago
It's really insanely fast in the quarter mile lol what a POS!!!!
princepersia1 10 months ago
Considering my piece of crap of a truck (1990 Toyota Pick-up) gets to 60 mph in about 15 seconds I like the fact it is 9.6 seconds to 60.
Silent14389 10 months ago
Jus drove it yesterday!!
The built quality is jus pure fab>>>
It has a punch to the pickup and is quick enough for a low-range luxury sedan!!
Anitrex4Anitrex 11 months ago
Miles ahead of the Cobalt. Cavaliers and Cobalts were dependable but crude.
7477238 11 months ago
when he did the brake test, hearing that sound i was waiting for the BANG!!
C0LL1N 11 months ago
I`ll bet the one with 163hp diesel would do better...
SirRetku 11 months ago
Hopefully getting this car for my 16th birthday. (:
SelenaL10 11 months ago 35
@SelenaL10
It's a great first car. Keep wishing, hope it comes true.
76carmel 11 months ago
@76carmel Thank you, [:
SelenaL10 11 months ago
@SelenaL10 Lucky you and your parents, I'm 22 and I had to take a 15 grand loan to buy one...
UglyBoost91 9 months ago
@UglyBoost91 Yeah i know, and well my mom had to take a loan to just so i could have this car so yeah lol.
SelenaL10 9 months ago
@SelenaL10 You have some nice parents! : )
UglyBoost91 9 months ago
@SelenaL10 u have nice rents hope u do get the car and enjoy it
Johnathandm 9 months ago
@SelenaL10 U r lucky, i had to rob a bank for this....
Ajzakcina 9 months ago
@SelenaL10 Wow, hopefully you do, this is a perfect car for teenagers!!
ZR1Terror 8 months ago
@ZR1Terror Yeah i already got it, and it's amazing. [:
SelenaL10 8 months ago
@SelenaL10 mazda 3 sport :)
hqhosam1671 3 months ago
God damn 122 ft to stop. lol. Thats wayyyy too long.
ChummyChime 1 year ago
@ChummyChime
122 ft. - too long? Actually for a subcompact, that's quite short. I'd be a little worried if the breaking is over 130 ft.
76carmel 11 months ago
@ChummyChime tell me about it, for the civic 2010 is 129ft to stop..lol
sEra323 9 months ago
I feel this vehicle is made by daewoo like the aveo (more like replacement to suzuki forenza) I wonder if the Regal will be the new Cobalt replacement for gm
gsxellence 1 year ago
@gsxellence This is the new "cobalt" replacement. They have another car coming out to replace the Aveo.
badassxr50r 1 year ago
@badassxr50r yea the sonic but I mean at least that the 1.4 turbo will match performance per weight.. this is is lacking. it's good car and nice but I think they need to give it an SS turbo worthiness like the upcoming GS..
gsxellence 1 year ago
All I want is an American made car that hauls ass, gets atleast 35 mpg, has AWD(beacuse snow sucks) and I can haul my family in. GM, Dodge and Ford all have cars and technology capable of this, but instead we get this? WTF? Imagine Ford Fusion SVT EcoBoost. Dodge Avenger SRT6, Chevy Malibu SS Turbo.
ProfessorK100 1 year ago 2
@ProfessorK100
"Ford Fusion SVT EcoBoost. Dodge Avenger SRT6, Chevy Malibu SS Turbo"
I like the way you think. The Big 3 should definitely make some high performance midsize cars.
adogg619 1 year ago
@ProfessorK100 That would be great to see that, the only you have wonder is how much would that cost on the market?
maniac4gm3 11 months ago
its that a real wheel drive or a front wheel drive ?
jemuvegen 1 year ago
@jemuvegen Really? I hope that isnt a serious question.
badassxr50r 1 year ago
Haha,the fastest stock cruze only sell in China!It's the 1.6 Turbo Cruze with 6MT.It's got 135KW and 266 Nm torque,0-60mph in 8s.even much better than the VW 1.8Turbo which just got 120kw and 235 nm's torque.
biaggi39363 1 year ago
They should have used direct injection on this engine, better mpgs and more power. But the factor of cost was huge.
lakewebsterkid 1 year ago
@lakewebsterkid
I think this is the Ecotec which I believe is direct injection. It has variable valve timing. Is it a direct injection exactly, or is it a psudo version of it?
76carmel 1 year ago
@76carmel No, if I am correct this is still port fuel injection. It does have VVT though.
lakewebsterkid 1 year ago 5
@lakewebsterkid
Thanks for letting me know. VVT in all major manufacturers have made vehicles that are much more fuel efficient.
76carmel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow this car is preety quiet and 66 mph through the slaom isn't bad at all, as a matter of fact its preety impressive for a small car thats focused more on efficency than performance. this car might be my first car, its cheap, fuel efficient, and refined. kudos to gm great job!
NasahrSandi9 1 year ago
Comment removed
NasahrSandi9 1 year ago
Gem! Z-link rocks, this is Chevy revolution time. Can't wait to drive the 1.8L
luv2growstuff 1 year ago
should b faster than that. didnt the nissan cube do 0-60 faster than this!
occckid123 1 year ago
สวยดีนะ ว่ามะ?
Kriangkrai29 1 year ago
@Kriangkrai29 i think ur the only thai person watching this lol XD
randomstough 1 year ago
The front end look's already dated. It would of look great when they launched the Malibu like 5 year's ago. The 2011 Cruze looks like a 2006 model. How can GM expect to beat the imports with new designs that already look old and chunky.
dieseldan420ca 1 year ago
ok...no lie. they have put this car in the same category as the ford fiesta...nice try chevy. ford focus will def make you forgettable
TheVineEra 1 year ago
The only thing Chevy had going for it with the Cavalier and Cobalt was that they were the fastest and most powerful cars stock in the Compact class, now they have taken that away with the Cruze.
StuinthaHouse 1 year ago
@StuinthaHouse That's the idea behind owning a Chevrolet so that you can beat the competition. Now with that gone why drive one?
maniac4gm3 11 months ago
I have a gut felling the current Cobalt SS will out perform the future Cruze SS, just like dodge did with their srt4
dieseldan420ca 1 year ago
@dieseldan420ca yea more than likely. Now Chevrolet has the Camaro V6 about the same price of a nicely equipped Cruze, it would not make any sense make it faster. I imagine the Cruze SS doing 6.5 - 7.5 0-60 MPH. Its just a guessed so dont quote me on that.
Pajapajin 1 year ago
Braking and slalom numbers are pretty good. The acceleration is very slow though, even for its class.
Im sure the Cruze SS will fix all of that.
Illmatic662 1 year ago
Gotta remember folks that this isn't meant to be a pocket rocket (yet), but it is VERY class competitive.
DeftonesFan867 1 year ago
@DeftonesFan867 totally agreed.. acc is waay to slow.. but then again this is not a sports car.. (yet lol)
betodj90 1 year ago
@betodj90 ..and I must say it looks great inside and out. Trying to get the gf to trade her Cobalt in for one, lol.
DeftonesFan867 1 year ago
People bitching this is too slow, realize it's a freaking 1.4 eco box getting high 30s MPG. It's more than adequate for commuting or journeys.
igeekone 1 year ago
why 2011... this exact car is already on sale in Europe for 2 years
AMVDawg 1 year ago
@AMVDawg Changes were made for the NA market.
DeftonesFan867 1 year ago
Damn it looks nice doing a slalom!
Finitum 1 year ago
Way slow!
hawkermustang 1 year ago
Very nice car...I'd say this is the best 'economical' car out there, but I'd opt for a bigger engine, I'd gladly give up 5mpg highway for something that gets to 60 in less than 8 seconds.
stanbernadino 1 year ago
@stanbernadino The base Impala will do that if you can afford it.
maniac4gm3 11 months ago
Pretty good looking in white
...but I think I'll hold off till a bigger engine is available.
mak450 1 year ago
way to slow
chrisw40 1 year ago
@chrisw40 for a 1.4T sedan thats pretty impressive not that you ever really need anything faster then a 10sec-60mph car in the real world anyway.
onoff314 1 year ago
@onoff314 i wouldnt call thatb impressive at all and sometimes you need a little power to merge and a 10 sec 0 to 60 car doesnt have it so you always going to have people riding up on your ass like crazy.
chrisw40 1 year ago
Bigger engine and It's a perfect Chevy..
Evolove510 1 year ago
epic fail!
ricetry97 1 year ago
i like it better than the old cobalt so far...
crammage 1 year ago
Wow everyone is complaining about the poor performance from the turbo. IT'S A 1.4L TURBO WHAT DO YOU WANT? It's not made for breakneck acceleration, it's made for fuel efficiency.
rudolphna54 1 year ago 43
@rudolphna54 1,4!!!
wholy shit thats fast
i thought that was the 1.6 !
will the 1.6 get almost as good mpg and be faster?
crammage 1 year ago
@crammage It's a choice of a N/A 1.8L and the 1.4L Turbo. Both make about the same horsepower. The turbo makes a bit more torque (with a flatter curve) and gets better fuel economy. The 1.4T will be the volume engine.
rudolphna54 1 year ago
@rudolphna54 That's the problem. There isn't enough differentiation between the 1.4 T and the 1.8 NA. They will provide essentially the exact same performance overall (save for straight-line performance). I think you'd be hardpressed to see a different lap time between the two "options"
pcfxer 1 year ago
@rudolphna54
Also, in addition, this is Chevy's competition against Toyota Corolla & Honda Civic. The Cruze is stepping up to the plate. GM had made the Cobalt and the Cruze, but did it cheaply, this Chevrolet wasn't competitive for it. Now with the Cruze and its features, it'll make Toyota and Honda sweat just a tad.
76carmel 1 year ago
@rudolphna54 And so the one thing you say it was made for is still one of the things it trails behind in its class
2314Raindrop 10 months ago
theres no way this is turbo
jumper1294 1 year ago
This car is going to dominate the market in its category whichever that would be :P
TJC450 1 year ago
Unfortunately its the turbo model ... That disappointing performance
solicama 1 year ago
@solicama IT'S A FUCKING 1.4L what do you want?
rudolphna54 1 year ago
This car blows. Just buy a Civic ppl.
Lambo6fo 1 year ago
@Lambo6fo Agreed, this car is just another shitty product that is disguised as looking cool.
charles125 1 year ago
@Lambo6fo these things are way nicer than a civic especially in the interior
BlessedMeWithHisFire 1 year ago
@Lambo6fo civic sucks its so slow
crammage 1 year ago
9.4 is NOT a turbo, obviously. God awful S L O W...
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
@marcomariaz26 Slalom is not too shabby, but everything else blows...
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
Hey Inside Line, it would help if you posted which engine you tested the Cruze with wouldn't it? Is it the turbo, or N/A? Garbage....
sdlausen 1 year ago
2011 Chevrolet Cruze: Coming to a rental car parking lot near you!
aallppiinnee 1 year ago 2
@aallppiinnee Lol what do the think the cobalt was.( with the exception of the SS model)
Roflcopterv1 1 year ago
@aallppiinnee Why? Because of the badge?
GTFO with that nonsense.
DeftonesFan867 1 year ago
This is a great city car, I'd appreciate the gas mileage.
quatlen 1 year ago
Slow but never made for performance, its made for people that want a nice small car to commute back and forth, with out the sacrifices of a traditional small car
Pauliepsi 1 year ago 4
haha my car is faster!
MrPS3Wii 1 year ago
Sooo its a run of the mill average family car. Not worth a track test really...
08 cobalt ss supercharged gets to 60 in HALF the time as this thing!
SoRealSoReal23 1 year ago
@SoRealSoReal23 HALF?? Really?? I don't think so... More like 2/3 the time... HALF would be 4.7. No STOCK Cobalt SS does that on any planet, anywhere. More like 0-60 in 6.1 with a perfect driver, 6.5 with an average one...
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
@marcomariaz26
well no not literally half the time but it ACTUALLY does 5.8 in a 0-60. Hate to burst your bubble but see for yourself-> watch?v=aQ7MD2jnQ8A
SoRealSoReal23 1 year ago
@SoRealSoReal23 No bubble to burst here. I don't care how fast the Cobalt SS Supercharged can run, to be honest. I was just calling you on your comment and how inaccurate it was. I'd take a Cobalt SS turbocharged over the Supercharged anyday, BTW...
marcomariaz26 1 year ago
@marcomariaz26
If you say so dude...
SoRealSoReal23 1 year ago
my focus is faster :(
hemroidalrampage 1 year ago
very slow car....thumbs down:P
mrchakarron 1 year ago
gotta love GM, my 1997 Mustang V6 auto is quicker
mitch9521 1 year ago
A '86 Honda Civic Aero Deck has a faster 0-60 run. Man, I should've never sold it.
gasfgiop 1 year ago
Thanks, InsideLine, for specifying which motor was equipped during this testing! Oh wait...you left that bit out. This is an extremely well built car that is so quiet inside it's ridiculous. It's not intended to be fast so all the haters please refrain from the silly comments. If they do an SS version of this car it will put the Speed3, GTI, WRX, and any other sporty econo cars to shame. This is unquestionably the nicest small car GM has ever produced and IMO nicest small car available in the US
idiotfieldmouse 1 year ago 3
@idiotfieldmouse HAHAHA to compete with the WRX, Ralliart, or MSP3?? dude even a shity lancer, impreza or mazda 3 could do a faster 0-60 run, an better than 17 sec on 1/4mile, for the same price and much better quality and resale value, for sure!
EvoXfreak 1 year ago
@EvoXfreak You aren't very good at reading are you? Obviously the Cruze used in this video would be waxed by any of your aforementioned cars. What I said, if you read carefully, was "If they do an SS version of this car." Meaning if they do a faster version of this car...you know..like the Cobalt SS...only a Cruze SS. And I only say it would put the competition to shame is because for once the interior on a GM small car is superior to the competition's offerings. Again, that is IF they do an SS
idiotfieldmouse 1 year ago
@idiotfieldmouse I was talking of a posible version of the SS compared to wrx ralli or mps3, I said even at the shitty versions, of your cruze and all the others, the cruze keeps being the worst choice.
EvoXfreak 1 year ago
@EvoXfreak How do you figure? The old (my current car) turbocharged Cobalt SS washed the floor with everyone of those cars in every performance category except for the WRX in a 1/4 mile run because they could launch the piss out of it, but the Cobalt had a higher trap speed. The only reason that every auto review company didn't put the Cobalt SS in first was because of the garbage interior. Now that the Cobalt's replacement has an improved interior, all it needs is a powerful drivetrain to win
idiotfieldmouse 1 year ago
This is what government enforced EPA guideline increases will do for performance.
dsm2xtreme 1 year ago
@dsm2xtreme yep but this lil thing has been said to get around 40mpg
atlridder 1 year ago
Piece of shit. It's numbers are as bad as a 96 2.2L OHV 3 speed cavalier.
I hated that car!
didderson 1 year ago
heh, honda civic > that dog eating korean piece of shit
mrdarkknight 1 year ago
@mrdarkknight ?
Tetragagaca 1 year ago
@Tetragagaca what?
mrdarkknight 1 year ago
i think i heard they were thinking on making a sporty version of this car but not sure...
Pajapajin 1 year ago
Good God... a stock Pontiac 6000 is faster than that...
donbehatin 1 year ago
People need to just calm down. Obviously this is not going to be a sporty car. It's meant for the daily consumer that needs a nice looking affordable and practical car. I am glad GM made this car, It gives me everything I need. 60-40 folding rear seats, power windows, great sitting room, 10 standard airbags, along with other things. Most often the sportiness of the car is never the selling point, because if you want a sports car you'd be buying your piece of shit mustangs. Thank you, and goodbye
dagrome 1 year ago 31
@dagrome nice...lol. i judge cars compared to price and practicality and this car beats a lot of others in that proportion. im not a fan of chevy but this was a smart build for them. hopefully they can turn it around soon without the government aid. thank you, and keep cruzing. lol.
adulby 1 year ago
@dagrome Weird the Sentra is sporty AND meant for daily driving.
pcfxer 1 year ago
@pcfxer Weird how it doesn't have standard power mirrors or floor mats or trip meter or 10 airbags or as good gas mileage. It has no warranty for rust damage, and its bumper to bumper warranty is only 36000 miles.
dagrome 1 year ago
@dagrome It does have std power mirrors, floor mats (in Canada) and a trip meter (in every part of the world...). The Sentra gets BETTER gas mileage for the majority consumer (automatic vs automatic [cvt]). It has corrosion warranty of 10 years/160, 000km and the CRUZE has only 3 yr /36000 miles BUMPER to BUMPER warranty as well. Where do you get your info? General Motors Propaganda?
pcfxer 1 year ago
@pcfxer I used Honda's site to compare so granted not all info might be correct, either way. The cvt auto gets the same gas mileage as the regular 1.4 liter turbo cruze city, but not for highway. Standard power mirrors and floor mats in Canada basically means that everyone else in the world has to pay for that extra shit. nissan also doesn't care about standard safety, you have to pay for abs and esc
dagrome 1 year ago
@dagrome a regular civic EX has all that and is faster then this car and will last longer and will have a much higher price when/if u decide to sell it and its been around for a while now......
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@ricksmiths10 I happen to own a Civic, i love how everyone assumes I must be a hardcore Chevy fan. I am not, I just think the Cruze is a really awesome car that I would love to own.
dagrome 1 year ago
@dagrome have u heard about wat the new civics r gonna be like?.......if yes, u wanna own this car still?
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@ricksmiths10 your a piece of shit the ex only gets 21mpg when your not stepping on it
GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 1 year ago
@GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 ur dumbass has obviously never owned a civic! civic's mpg rating r almost allways understated! my car according to epa gives 36 mpg on highway however when i take it on roadtrips it gives me 40+ on highway and i floor it alot in normal city driving and my car still manages 30-32 mpgs!.......get ur facts right before talking dumbass chevy boy! lol
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@ricksmiths10 your a complete dumb fuck i had a 98 civic and it does give you good mileage but not vtec models(ex, si, etc.) you said you had an ex thats vtec those dont have high mpg fuckn dumbass fagboy get off hondas nuts
GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 1 year ago
@GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 u would really know how good mpgs they give since u dont have one right? lol fucking idiot telling me how many mpgs my car gives me! i think u made it quiet obvious who is the "dumbass" over here.
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@ricksmiths10 your a dumbass my friend had a 08 si his shit got garbage mpg 21 tops
and your over here telling your vtak gets more mpgs than a base civic model your a complete fuckn idiot you cant even prove your point you lame piece of dry shit
GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 1 year ago
@GGGGGGGTHEBEST7 i dont know what the fuck u smoke but ur a retard civic si's sedan gives 30 mpgs on hghway and ur a retard again for comparing a si