@Danox94 That's a shame. You should always keep your game consoles. Even so, you should probably make an investment in another PS2. The console itself is fairly inexpensive these days and there is no shortage of excellent games on the platform that won't cost you much. Frontline can be found for less than $5 in most game shops these days.
@WDWtowerofterror Don't worry about it. The PS2 version, which was the version used for the HD remastering, didn't have any multiplayer in 2002, either. The other last-generation ports had limited splitscreen MP, but it was never an online game. MoH's MP has never been its selling point.
@CrAzY3AGL3 I never said it wasn't great in AA. It's just that it wasn't the reason people ran out to buy AA. They bought it for the single-player campaign, not the multiplayer.
Don't get me wrong, I love AA's multiplayer. Well, I do when the community doesn't play like bitches, at least, but they usually do. I'm more of an Unreal Tournament person, myself.
@spicyechidna94 actually aa mp was the big part of it every commercial had it. oh and aa still owns many mp games by a mile none of ut games have passed medal of honor aa server number till this day.now dont get me wrong im not being a fanboy here but aa was advertised about mp alot.
@CrAzY3AGL3 Well, I didn't own AA back in 2002, so I don't really know. I have more experience with the console games. If nothing else, people bought the early console games for the single player. That much is certain.
However, I have to disagree with your statement about UT being not as good as AA in multiplayer. AA's was good, but it was a bit too standard. UT was solely designed for multiplayer. The servers aren't very large anymore because it's from 1999.
@spicyechidna94 i play ut 1999 and 2004 on pc 2004 has some servers but is dying slowly ut 1999 was ok but i did not like the hud the sniper rifle in it was awesome :D
breathtaking graphics.. :) that was teh good ol' days until gay and speedy Call of Duty took over..
bloodhoun138 6 months ago in playlist Medal of Honor: Frontline Videos
haha they used infinite health cheat
HaL0addict001 8 months ago
you are welcome. i love your videos! you rock
Doom2012Today 11 months ago
the good old times of videogames!
Doom2012Today 11 months ago 3
@Doom2012Today Oh, definitely. Thanks for subscribing.
spicyechidna94 11 months ago
i really want this game... but i can´t play it!
i sold my ps2 to a friend xD
Danox94 1 year ago
@Danox94 That's a shame. You should always keep your game consoles. Even so, you should probably make an investment in another PS2. The console itself is fairly inexpensive these days and there is no shortage of excellent games on the platform that won't cost you much. Frontline can be found for less than $5 in most game shops these days.
spicyechidna94 1 year ago
i have the remastered version but no mutiplayer!! :(
WDWtowerofterror 1 year ago
@WDWtowerofterror Don't worry about it. The PS2 version, which was the version used for the HD remastering, didn't have any multiplayer in 2002, either. The other last-generation ports had limited splitscreen MP, but it was never an online game. MoH's MP has never been its selling point.
spicyechidna94 1 year ago
@spicyechidna94 medal of honor allied assault 1000s of players till this days so yeah mohaa was know for having great mp.
CrAzY3AGL3 1 year ago
@CrAzY3AGL3 I never said it wasn't great in AA. It's just that it wasn't the reason people ran out to buy AA. They bought it for the single-player campaign, not the multiplayer.
Don't get me wrong, I love AA's multiplayer. Well, I do when the community doesn't play like bitches, at least, but they usually do. I'm more of an Unreal Tournament person, myself.
spicyechidna94 1 year ago
@spicyechidna94 actually aa mp was the big part of it every commercial had it. oh and aa still owns many mp games by a mile none of ut games have passed medal of honor aa server number till this day.now dont get me wrong im not being a fanboy here but aa was advertised about mp alot.
CrAzY3AGL3 1 year ago
@CrAzY3AGL3 Well, I didn't own AA back in 2002, so I don't really know. I have more experience with the console games. If nothing else, people bought the early console games for the single player. That much is certain.
However, I have to disagree with your statement about UT being not as good as AA in multiplayer. AA's was good, but it was a bit too standard. UT was solely designed for multiplayer. The servers aren't very large anymore because it's from 1999.
spicyechidna94 1 year ago
@spicyechidna94 i play ut 1999 and 2004 on pc 2004 has some servers but is dying slowly ut 1999 was ok but i did not like the hud the sniper rifle in it was awesome :D
CrAzY3AGL3 1 year ago
@spicyechidna94 well my cousin has multiplayer
WDWtowerofterror 8 months ago
@WDWtowerofterror He must have a version other than the PS2 or PS3 versions, then. Neither of those versions had multiplayer, but the others do.
spicyechidna94 8 months ago
Good times good times
pcplaya1 1 year ago
It's funny, Frontline had over 300 different enemy types while Airborne barely had 10
corvettecrazy262 1 year ago
An absolute classic! I've always wanted to see a behind the scenes of Frontline. Thank you so much for uploading!
skull695 1 year ago
@skull695 I'm glad you liked it! Frontline has an interesting backstory.
spicyechidna94 1 year ago