Guy with brown pants leading the pack in slow motion @ 1:51...duuuuude work on your form before you fracture your foot and try blaming it on five fingers(if you haven't already, buy the book Natural Running). Limp wrist = thanks for the laugh
Why are the top 10 comments always totally unrelated to the video? At 01:02 this video clearly proves that we are related to ducks. I recommend trying it though, it works for me.
I am a huge fan of barefoot running, but I don't buy the whole evolution explanation. I believe the God of the Bible designed us perfectly (before the fall), which is why barefoot running is so great and naturally a better way to run that with running shoes. I do agree however with the Harvard professor on the fact that barefoot running is the way were were designed to run. If you are unfamiliar with the SCIENCE behind biblical creation answersingenesisdotorg is a great site.
@ruburtoe1, if you're going to accuse me of being stupid you might want to provide a better argument than that over time evolution has eventually made our feet good for barefoot running. There has been no evidence found supporting macro-evolution of any kind.
Love the shoes but don't buy the prof's comments:-
so let me get this straight - Vibram has pulled together many intelligent people to think up a new product which has taken them much effort, time, technology, computer simulation, trial and error - to make a product that essentially just allows the leg and foot to do what it is meant to do.
But the phenomenally complex mechanisms within the leg and foot randomly evolved....?
@shonoj I don't think anybody claimed that the phenomenally complex mechanisms of our legs and feet RANDOMLY evolved. Nothing about evolution is random. The fact is, we went from being a primarily quadripedal species to a bipedal species and we HAD to make changes to make our pelvis work for our new ambulatory stance. The leg and foot are AMAZING works of evolutionary art developed over millions of years.
A shoe that takes a few years to develop in order to respect the foot? Makes sense to me.
@cameronchaseshaw you see this is what I just don't get, you say 'we went from a primarily quadripedal species to a bipedal species' - the processes involved in that almost cast away statement seems beyond the scope of our ability to accurately map (easy to do in big broad statements but I'd really would like to see a systems engineering chart that shows the exact required genetic mutation of every necessary element)
Evolutionary catch-up? we can't be bipedal without the perfect working of legs
@shonoj Standing up is great when part of the evolutionary imperative for human is the freedom to use our hands articulately. Just because the legs work (a dog can be taught to "walk") doesn't mean that a pelvis/spine intended for horizontal ambulation can survive years of bipedal movement. I'm not trying to be an ass or use "throw-away" statements, but the fossil record does show pelvic and spinal changes after the advent of bipedal ambulation that make us more suited to be a bipedal species.
The working of legs doesn't have to be "perfect" for the comparative advantage of having hands free for articulate use (tools, etc.) to be greater than that of the avoidance of spinal compression and the improper seating of the humerus in the acetabulum. The change in the ration of bone lengths and joint angles at proper seating reflect the changes made to accommodate greater vertical force endured by joints/supportive tissues during compressive activities like standing, walking, and running.
I am so glad for this movement. We as a species have been running barefoot or with something like thin sandles for millions of years.Greeks,Mongolians, Samurai's, Native Americans and our whole species have hunted and gathered for millions of years and it was all done without a giant heeled shoe. This is how we are supposed to be. Granted, running on cement and pavement isnt one hundred percent natural, since grass is what we were meant to run on, but we can handle it,we were made for this.
@77evolved I bet you didn't know that, "evolved", that the modern running shoe was not invented until the 1970's. So what did athletes used before then? That's right, minimally supportive footwear made of leather or canvas.
@Jouwl Do you realize how ignorant that sounds? Let's play with words a bit. Evidence for a young man does not explain evidence for an old man. Do you see the problem with your statement now?
Regardless of how much evidence for a young earth you have, you can't stick to the idea that the earth is young when you've found evidence for an older earth.
Either way, this 'evidence' for a young earth you speak of is probably nonsense.
the whole barefoot crowd running in town looks idiotic. but americans are genuines at propaganda stuff..yeah we were born without no shoes haha nice try douchebag, what's next take our clothes off
@whothennow24 running is a form of art according to one of America's greatest runners; Steve Prefontaine. Wanna insult him and run with him if he came back from the dead?
@CrazyHermit So if I am the world's best nose-picker, and I declare nose-picking to be art, then it is so? No. I don't care who says what is art; just because a person is good at it doesn't mean that he gets to define art. There is no insult in saying running isn't art. Don't be so sensitive. Golly.
Pardon me, but there are have been millions if not billions of humans that ran far better than he did. You're insulting all of them by suggesting that some recently dead runner athlete defines running.
After four days and I have not so tired as I am driving technique. The shoe has very good grip and good feeling with the ground, I'm on Twitter @huellaecologica
Guy with brown pants leading the pack in slow motion @ 1:51...duuuuude work on your form before you fracture your foot and try blaming it on five fingers(if you haven't already, buy the book Natural Running). Limp wrist = thanks for the laugh
motownkramer 7 months ago
Why are the top 10 comments always totally unrelated to the video? At 01:02 this video clearly proves that we are related to ducks. I recommend trying it though, it works for me.
Elantry 9 months ago
I am a huge fan of barefoot running, but I don't buy the whole evolution explanation. I believe the God of the Bible designed us perfectly (before the fall), which is why barefoot running is so great and naturally a better way to run that with running shoes. I do agree however with the Harvard professor on the fact that barefoot running is the way were were designed to run. If you are unfamiliar with the SCIENCE behind biblical creation answersingenesisdotorg is a great site.
tconx85 1 year ago
@tconx85 youre stupid, there is no god, evolution has eventually made our feet good for running barefooted-ly..
ruburtoe1 1 year ago
@ruburtoe1 Hey, it doesn't matter what we all believe in. I like barefoot running, but I also believe in God, nothing wrong with it.
CrazyHermit 11 months ago
@ruburtoe1, if you're going to accuse me of being stupid you might want to provide a better argument than that over time evolution has eventually made our feet good for barefoot running. There has been no evidence found supporting macro-evolution of any kind.
tconx85 11 months ago
@tconx85 well "god" is a much worse argument, theres no proof or logic behind that. there is, though, common sense behind evolution, it makes sense.
ruburtoe1 9 months ago
@tconx85 I believe God create our bodies in his perfect image, but we have tried to fix it, only to get hurt. That's why I took up barefoot running.
CrazyHermit 11 months ago
@tconx85 god doesn't though so wtf are you talking about?
ab0d3ba093 7 months ago
Love the shoes but don't buy the prof's comments:-
so let me get this straight - Vibram has pulled together many intelligent people to think up a new product which has taken them much effort, time, technology, computer simulation, trial and error - to make a product that essentially just allows the leg and foot to do what it is meant to do.
But the phenomenally complex mechanisms within the leg and foot randomly evolved....?
c'mon - pull another one.
shonoj 1 year ago
@shonoj I don't think anybody claimed that the phenomenally complex mechanisms of our legs and feet RANDOMLY evolved. Nothing about evolution is random. The fact is, we went from being a primarily quadripedal species to a bipedal species and we HAD to make changes to make our pelvis work for our new ambulatory stance. The leg and foot are AMAZING works of evolutionary art developed over millions of years.
A shoe that takes a few years to develop in order to respect the foot? Makes sense to me.
cameronchaseshaw 1 year ago
@cameronchaseshaw you see this is what I just don't get, you say 'we went from a primarily quadripedal species to a bipedal species' - the processes involved in that almost cast away statement seems beyond the scope of our ability to accurately map (easy to do in big broad statements but I'd really would like to see a systems engineering chart that shows the exact required genetic mutation of every necessary element)
Evolutionary catch-up? we can't be bipedal without the perfect working of legs
shonoj 1 year ago
@shonoj Standing up is great when part of the evolutionary imperative for human is the freedom to use our hands articulately. Just because the legs work (a dog can be taught to "walk") doesn't mean that a pelvis/spine intended for horizontal ambulation can survive years of bipedal movement. I'm not trying to be an ass or use "throw-away" statements, but the fossil record does show pelvic and spinal changes after the advent of bipedal ambulation that make us more suited to be a bipedal species.
cameronchaseshaw 1 year ago
The working of legs doesn't have to be "perfect" for the comparative advantage of having hands free for articulate use (tools, etc.) to be greater than that of the avoidance of spinal compression and the improper seating of the humerus in the acetabulum. The change in the ration of bone lengths and joint angles at proper seating reflect the changes made to accommodate greater vertical force endured by joints/supportive tissues during compressive activities like standing, walking, and running.
cameronchaseshaw 1 year ago
1:57
guy heel striking in vibrams
ferozoso23 1 year ago 2
@ferozoso23
Yes, horrible. I hope someone enlightens him before he wrecks his feet.
Jouwl 1 year ago
Hello, can I just comment on the desighn?
There is one thing thats still wrong with this,
plain and simple:
- the achilles heel is impeded, you need to cut it free if you want to move
as free as those hopeys and navaho indians.
huibruben 1 year ago
Just hit the 200 mile mark on my Vibrams. Love them!
Wolffman05 1 year ago 2
VFF, for the win!!!
CrazyHermit 1 year ago
I am getting those motherloving Vibrams!!!
SavageSavang 1 year ago
I am so glad for this movement. We as a species have been running barefoot or with something like thin sandles for millions of years.Greeks,Mongolians, Samurai's, Native Americans and our whole species have hunted and gathered for millions of years and it was all done without a giant heeled shoe. This is how we are supposed to be. Granted, running on cement and pavement isnt one hundred percent natural, since grass is what we were meant to run on, but we can handle it,we were made for this.
magicrhymesx 1 year ago
so, what your saying is that "god" is responsible for you being an idiot? makes perfect sense...
77evolved 1 year ago
@77evolved
Way to toss out insults for no good reason (unless one considers a smug sense of superiority a good reason).
OscarSchneegans 1 year ago
@77evolved I bet you didn't know that, "evolved", that the modern running shoe was not invented until the 1970's. So what did athletes used before then? That's right, minimally supportive footwear made of leather or canvas.
TheHungarianchick 1 year ago
These guys may have evolved, but I was intelligently designed. Thank God for making man in His image!
codyhill06 1 year ago
@codyhill06
sorry buddy evolution is real and observable in nature
ferozoso23 1 year ago
@ferozoso23 Micro evolution, yes. Macro evolution, no. There is plenty of evidence for a young earth.
codyhill06 1 year ago
@codyhill06
Evidence for a young earth does not explain evidence for an old earth, meaning the idea is stupid and must be discarded according to common sense.
Jouwl 1 year ago
@Jouwl Do you realize how ignorant that sounds? Let's play with words a bit. Evidence for a young man does not explain evidence for an old man. Do you see the problem with your statement now?
codyhill06 1 year ago
@codyhill06
Regardless of how much evidence for a young earth you have, you can't stick to the idea that the earth is young when you've found evidence for an older earth.
Either way, this 'evidence' for a young earth you speak of is probably nonsense.
Jouwl 1 year ago
@Jouwl Either the earth is young or old, evidence proves one or the other -- not both. While now you're using ignorance to assume I'm wrong.
codyhill06 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@codyhill06
Whatever.
en.wikipedia.or g/wiki/Age_of_earth
Jouwl 1 year ago
Funny: the runner leading the group from 1'50" to 2'00" is heel-striking with every stride!
scaramoucheX 1 year ago
the whole barefoot crowd running in town looks idiotic. but americans are genuines at propaganda stuff..yeah we were born without no shoes haha nice try douchebag, what's next take our clothes off
mrrrxxxxx 1 year ago
1:25, hahaha: that guy's an idiot. Running is not an "art." That's the most ridiculous thing I've heard.
whothennow24 1 year ago
@whothennow24 running is a form of art according to one of America's greatest runners; Steve Prefontaine. Wanna insult him and run with him if he came back from the dead?
CrazyHermit 1 year ago
@CrazyHermit So if I am the world's best nose-picker, and I declare nose-picking to be art, then it is so? No. I don't care who says what is art; just because a person is good at it doesn't mean that he gets to define art. There is no insult in saying running isn't art. Don't be so sensitive. Golly.
whothennow24 1 year ago
@CrazyHermit
Pardon me, but there are have been millions if not billions of humans that ran far better than he did. You're insulting all of them by suggesting that some recently dead runner athlete defines running.
Boo.
Jouwl 1 year ago
funny, in the crowd of barefoot runners, i can see some still landing on their heels (ouch!)
frustratedoperator 1 year ago
After four days and I have not so tired as I am driving technique. The shoe has very good grip and good feeling with the ground, I'm on Twitter @huellaecologica
MrAlvarotube 1 year ago
Well done thank you
cdmentor 1 year ago
They were taking a ton of video footage throughout the morning. I hope we can expect more videos from this event. My wife and I had a blast!
kmfranck 1 year ago
Uh oh... heel striker at 1:54.
belayme 1 year ago 2
@belayme He'll learn. (He should at least do something better with his arms.)
TerrorBlack 1 year ago