Who REALLY runs our world? search "israel Did 911 All Proof in the World" and search "ZionCrimeFactory" for proof.
Reporting on the death of supremacist Zionist leader David Wolffsohn, the September 17, 1914, edition of THE NEW YORK TIMES tells us that during his closing address at the Zionist Congress at the Hague in 1907 Wolffsohn “pleaded for greater unity among the Jews and said that eventually they must conquer the world.”
w(dot)zioncrimefactory com/jew-world-order SPREAD THE TRUTH!
@justonemorename Just when I think u might be sane, u remind me that ur a Ron Paul supporter! haha We can talk about this forever, but in the end u arent going to convince enough people that we were better off discriminating. Paul has already ruined his chances of being president because of his lack of common sense on this and other important issues. Hes already lost the rep nomination and the presidential race so theres really nothing to worry about! :D This conversation is just philosophical!
@justonemorename asked "why do you keep sayin Jews woman and blacks?" NEWSFLASH - Prior to the Civil Rights Act business could and did put up signs saying "No Jews Allowed"; businesses could and did deny women jobs because of their sex; businesses could and did deny blacks service because of their color! Thats why I keep saying jews, women, and blacks!
Thank God for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and God bless America!
@justonemorename The more I chat with u, the more I get the impression that we dont disagree about much. It seems we agree that bigotry and racism is bad for the country! We just disagree about how to deal with it. Thats ok. Americans have already decided how to deal with hit - The Civil Rights Act of 1964! :D And history shows that our decision made the country better for millions of Americans. Ur way might have worked too. But why take the chance and risk more racism again?! :D
@justonemorename I understand how u feel. Americans agreed with u about protests but they also wanted to do more AND THEY DID MORE by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964! Thank God! We saw the horrible effects that bigotry and racism had on our country and we decided to limit it and make our country BETTER! Good luck with convincing the millions of jews, women, blacks, christians, muslims, etc. that allowing discrimination again will be good for the country! LMAO Ron Paul has no chance! :D
@justonemorename um...u totally lost me! LOL I think u meant to say that civil rights for minorities like jews, women, black, muslims "lowered our standard of living" and did nothing to improve our nation. Let me know if I misunderstood ur point. I think its very important for voters to understand what Ron Paul supporters think about civil rights! :D
There is no way to get money out of politics. Politicians make campaign finance laws and the current law make politicians rich! So why the hell would they change it?!
Campaign finance reform is a myth that will never be reality unless we find another way to make politicians rich without private donations.
@justonemorename U didnt contest anything I said in my last post so I figure we agree on the points I made: 1. Govt is made up of people we elected; 2. The politicians we elected limited the rights of bigots and racists; and 3. Our country is a BETTER PLACE now that the right to discriminate based on race, sex, color, religion, and national origin is limited.
Let me know if u disagree with any of the 3 points I made, otherwise, I'm glad we finally agree! :D
@justonemorename As i read the "book" of posts u wrote, i got the impression that ur not a fan of democracy! U talk about govt as if its an alien that took over the country! NEWSFLASH Govt is made of people that were ELECTED!
The Civil Rights Act was passed because Americans saw discrimination hurt our country and we didnt like it. So we ELECTED PEOPLE to make our country better by outlawing discrimination. Its a better place now that the rights of bigots and racists r limited! Thank God!
All these 'wankers' are doing is moving favors around. Your government is fuckin broken...fix it....we are the masses with the internet who don't like this shit!
@justonemorename To think that without govt there would be no racism is INSANE! NEWSFLASH - Govt is made up of PEOPLE! Moron! And that is another reason not to vote for Ron Paul - he's that crazy old uncle with outdated beliefs, like racists need more freedom! LOL
To take away the rights of bigots and racists is to IMPROVE our society! That is a fact! Just pick up a history book to learn about how the lives of MILLIONS OF AMERICANS improved when the Civil Rights Act was passed!
Ohrela im pretty sure explaining it like that wont help much. You could have explained better by saying Ron Paul believes everybody no matter race or religion should be treated the same.
I'm really behind all those Americans demonstrating to get back their American Dream. Go for it people.
However, I just hate hearing this Arab Spring nonsense. Let's get real. Their is and never was an Arab Spring. Iraqis, Afghans, Yemenis, Libyans, Egyptians, Palestinians, Pakistanis are all under the attack of America and people are dieing by the hundreds because of America and its minions.
I'm very thankful that the veto should keep America out of Syria. I hope!
If you sit home waiting your turn you deserve to have your gun taken from your cold dead hands.
The Founders didn’t wait for the Brits to knock down their doors. They gathered at the green and stood up like men and they killed government employees all the way back to Boston.
What will you do when it’s time to hunt NWO hacks, republicrats and commies(“Liberals” and ‘progressives’)?
Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first. Then read my column ‘Prepping for Slavery’
The only reason the dollar is still standing is because China is the biggest holder of the dollar. Otherwise, it would have been gone already...
Let's not forget that Saddam Hussein's greatest sin was that he was going to start taking other forms of payment for Iraq's oil. The central banks didn't want that, so they sent in their goons (the U.S. co-opted military, their strongmen) to take care of the problem. Same for Gaddafi...
@ramura001 It's also a race to the bottom between the USD and the Euro.
If Greece, Portugal, etc, default, and the Euro goes down, Europe will become a USD sucking hole, which will absorb a huge quantity of dollars, an effective bail-out of the US, and license to Bernanke to print even more for his friends to spend.
The solution is not "HONEST DEMOCRACY", but small-budget-weak-president Republic where democracy is only exercised during election time and the president has no budget to give away as favors. In such framework, it does not matter who is "in charge", a socialist or neo-con.
I looked at Ratigan's proposed amendment. It's anti-liberty. It would forbid ANY private donations going to political campaigns. Which can only mean that tax money will be financing campaigns. If that happens then only those already in power within govt will decide who gets funding. It would insure that only pro-statists nominees would get campain money. Liberty defenders, like Dr. Paul, wouldn't get a dime. If it were in place 4 yrs ago there would've never been a r3VOLution. No Thnx!
@collector842002 Private sector, including the little kid who breaks open his piggy bank to give $10 to Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, Obama, Perry or the Rent's-Too-Damn-High guy.
@MrPloppy1 Tax money would be financing campaigns, but the whole point of such a system is the money would be distributed fairly. They government would not be able to just fund whoever they like - the press would pick up on it, and it would backfire.
I don't like the idea of paying more tax, but it's the only fair way I can think of. I guess they could set up a system where people can donate and the money would be distributed evenly, but I think that defeats the purpose of these donations.
@strakha0 Of course the govt can do whatever they want. Remember the bank bailouts? 90% of americans were against that, and they did it anyway. The press is owned by big corporations. You think they're gonna report on unfairly distributed public campaign funds? Look how they've been treating Ron Paul. He came in a very close 2nd in Iowa's straw poll. headlines read "Bachmann in 1st -- Pawlenty in 3rd." That's why Paul supporters are planning a "Black THIS Out" campaign fundraiser (moneybomb).
@MrPloppy1 No it wouldn't. It would ensure everyone gets the same amount. If you registered to run and got the nomination, you and your opponent would get exactly equal amounts of money. The Gov't wouldn't decide who gets what, that's pretty obvious.
@mw2000 How's a candidate even going to get nominated? How are they going to tell primary voters "Here I am. This is what I think." Without seed money to communicate to voters noone would know who they are. You couldn't let anybody who says that they want to run for office have the money. There'd be a million ppl running for a party's nomination with their hand out. Somebody's gonna make the selecting, & it won't be the people.
Third parties? They gonna get a cent? They'll be 100% shut out.
You don't understand how it works. Just look at the Canadian model for elections. Only 6 weeks long, every political party that is big enough, gets equal amount of air time and money. Although, like every ssytem it is not perfect.
@0hs0Zen0 Enjoyed Mouseland.....but I'm still going to vote for Ron Paul. What fact are you talking about? The PAC money? It's well known for years Paul doesn't take any....We don't have to fact check it.
Ron Paul does not know the Occupy Wall Street agenda. All he's said so far is that he supports their rights to protest. He's also strong on ending the FED and ending these damn Wars. But, I haven't seen any protesters against FED or the Wars on Wall Street either.
@InCMPunkWeTrust Both 'LibertyPAC' and 'RevolutionPAC' are corporations. He also has received support from the Republicon Party, which is itself a corporation.
@PostSurgeOperative Ron Paul supports the free market and freedom. not crony capitalism. nobody believes he is a threat. Dr Paul is just an elderly gentleman who wouldnt hurt a fly.
@clownporn1 He wins his district every time he runs. Giant corporations don't pay him money because they know he can't be bought. He stands firm on his principles. Under his presidency, monopolies will not be protected and EVERY bill that is sent to him for bailouts and federal contracts will be vetoed. I don't get how you can say that he gets money directly from corporations then change the subject without backing up your claim.
@clownporn1 Is Ron Paul quitting? Not surprising. The Republicons did or were going to give him a big primary challenge in the last election. He may be quitting to retire or because he doesn't want to fight his own party anymore just to keep his seat.
@OldSchoolSkill Money is not the problem, it is a transparency problem. We could never have Ron Paul if we couldn't send in money. Monetary freedom is no different than personal freedom. Protect both.
My congressman Cassidy promised he would vote against HR 2751 so I quit handing out hand bills later I checked his record and he voted FOR the bill. It was called the food safety bill reason it is so bad is becasuse I READ it and when you READ a bill you will not vote for it. The patriot act has a hidden TAX in it truckers have to pay $94x~,$138 twic and more for background checks people the Canadians nor Mexican truckers don't have to pay that ! They are putting tarrifs on USA citizens !
@boricuamm70& WRong Paul DOES have a PAC. It's called, 'LibertyPAC'. He also has a so-called 'Super PAC', which can receive UNLIMITED contributions from individuals and corporations, even shell corps, which means we will never know WHO gave, or how much or specifically when each individual contributed.
@missjulievu miss julievu one dollar or one million dollars taken from a corporation is not the point, this man does receive money from corporations , he is a scam artist this ron paul character is.
The problem with what Ratigan is proposing is that it's going to lead to publicly funded elections, in other words, we are forced to pay for Mrs. Palins, or Mr. Perry's or Barry's election. The fed is the real source of the problem because it got these corps. so rich that they were the only ones powerful enough to use lobbying in their interest. We need more ppl lobbying for freedom to offset the fascists. Putting more controls on the process won't fix things, just benefit the big guys more.
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp The banks that got bailed out! The same banks you say he gets backed from. If I listened to what I was told to then why on earth did I ever listen to Paul since every media source says he's nuts? See I actually think you have pre conceived notions and then admittedly make up facts to back up your view. Pretty pathetic.
@kingcherub That was very informative, a refresher in some respects but also filled me in on some specifics. I still don't understand how The Fed being owned by corporations, who also buy politicians through lobbyists, is an instrument of the state who they essentially own? Further more the Fed is not accountable to the state or anyone else, so I don't see how the Fed can be used by the state.
@Ohrela Obviously (or, maybe not so much so) I was using hyperbole. I just meant that the problem is not so much that the corporations are so powerful that they own the government. It is that the state, as defined as the entity that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence within a given territory, is the real power and it gets almost all of that power from having the ability to fund whatever it wants with money they can print out of thin air.
@Ohrela Also, it all a big cluster. It's nearly impossible to separate what is a private entity and what is a public entity at this level of the establishment. So, I hardly make the distinction. But, to me the situation we have now would never occur without the power of territorial monopolies on the legitimate use of violence.
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp He wanted them to all go bankrupted dumbass. I mean how weak of an intellectual are you? You admitted that there's no proof he gets donation and said you just made it up!
Ron Paul, your starting to piss me off. The guy is asking and asking about campaign reform and asking your opinion and you keep going back and going back to your talking point about the Fed. Have you ever heard of the concept of “the right time and the right place”? I want to hear your ideas on campaign reform now, talk about the Fed later. Campaign reform is, to me, the most important issue. Nothing else ever gets fixed until the politicians stop being owned by the wealthy.
@dalecs47 I think what he's implying, is that the existence of the Federal Reserve doesn't allow for campaign reform now. The Federal Reserve just prints money and if we had sound money, then the "lobbying" would not and could not get so out of control.
@dalecs47 Did you miss the part where he acknowledged the issue of campaign finance reform, but elaborated that the bigger issue is our debt based monetary policy? Did you hear the part where he said he doesn't get any Pac money so the lobbyists don't pay him any attention? Do you understand that the dollar is losing its role as the world reserve currency and already countries are trading with each other without purchasing dollars to do so.
@Ohrela Do you realize when the dollar loses it's role as the world reserve currency the 8 trillion plus that are held by other countries are going to flood the market in the US, and will become essentially worthless? Do you understand anything outside of media talking points, or do you just regurgitate what you are told to believe from your socialist progressive liberal box?
Dr. Paul is trying to explain that a simple constitutional amendment won't solve all the problems. "We have to look at the big picture as well, there's more money in the Fed who buys out the special interests, so we eventually have to deal with that." He explains further, "We see a lot on the surface but there's money in the undergound." IOW, The whole monetary and economic system needs to be changed on a fundamental level. Read his book "End the Fed" for some insight on the subject
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp So you just making shit up if there is no way to prove it. His politics are consistant for 30 years. That is a logical deduction that he has not sold his beliefs. Who are his wall street buddies, names and evidence of affiliation please. It is unconstitutional to take peoples money and spend it as you please regardless of whether YOU think these programs serve a greater good.
Campaign Finance Reform?! LMAO It will NEVER happen! Politicians make campaign finance laws and campaign finance laws make politicians rich! So tell me - WHY THE HELL WOULD POLITICIANS GETTING RICH FROM CAMPAIGN FINANCE CHANGE THE LAWS! LMAO It will never happen! Get over it America!
WE NEED TO BE REAL CAREFUL WITH WHAT THESE OLD CORRUPT BROKEN SYSTEMS ARE REPLACED WITH - BECUASE THE PEOPLE WILL WIN OUT WE KNOW WHAT WE DONT WANT - WE JUST NEED TO KNOW WHAT WE NOW WANT - LETS NOT ALLOW THE BASTARDS TO REPLACE SYSTEMS WITH MORE TYRANICAL SYSTEMS.
@whatisahumans "Theres this guy, he watches youtube videos all the time and talks like he knows what hes talking about. i think his screenname is whatisahumans. ahahaha" -- David Koch speaking about whatisahumans
Because you know it's fucking true but your own cognitive dissonance prevents you from accepting any piece of information that doesn't conform with your entrenched beliefs about your lord and savior, Ron Paul?
@BigDaddyDJD Please explain how CEOs and their big corporations don't love Ron Paul for championing tax cuts and deregulation to his brainwashed poor and middle class cult members.
@whatisahumans Big corporations wouldn't love Ron Paul because they would lose subsidies, offshore tax havens, and corporate bail outs... If the tax code was flat for every corporation that would even the playing field, weeding out non-efficient companies supported by the tax code and subsidized by the tax player. Oil companies are subsidized by the tax payer to promote "clean energy" which is a disaster.
@andreszuniga88 I know ron paul has struck a chord with you and he sounds like a decent guy but I think you are beleivin what you want to believe , ron paul was asked along with all the presidential candidates would you raise taxes by lower loopholes and he said NO,so ron paul would allow subsidies offshore tax havens BUT NOT corporate bailouts and ron paul would endorse a flat tax that would tax income tax the rich make money in others like stocks for example it wouldnt be fair.
@samtotheg He is a libertarian and that means no subsidies leaving an even playing field for all people and let the market dictate who makes money not government policy, I think you should read up on libertarianism before making uninformed comments. In addition to a flat tax that would be the most even form of taxation the poor would pay a flat 5% for example and so would the rich so it would scale on income which would be fair. Capital gains tax is money you make on stocks by the way.
@andreszuniga88 thats not fair becuase thats taxes on our income the income tax what we work for a flat tax is unfair for instance the poor only make money thru income and the rich have stocks and inheritance etc ...so the poor really pay 5 percent of their income and the rich do not , becuase they make money in other ways ,ron paul would have to end all the tax loopholes and he is not for taht period, so guess what thats not fair to us the little guy, sounds like a guy who is bs'ing to me.
@samtotheg It's obvious I would never win in this discussion with you since you make up false "facts". Your previous statement claimed he is for subsidies when he clearly isn't, now you say he is screwing the poor by providing tax loop holes? I provided facts for my statements now where are yours? If anything Ron Paul said he wants to eliminate the federal income tax so how is that providing tax loop holes when the tax would be gone?
@andreszuniga88 so why did you throw flat tax thing in the discussion if he is for NO TAXES at all debate his policies at hand and stop side tracking people gettin people to engage in YOUR OFF TOPIC points,and sayin thats not what ron paul endorses , stick to what he is for.
@samtotheg In the previous GOP debates he said "what if we had a flat 8% tax but you have no entitlement programs and the government doesn't take care of you but rather personal responsibility" he ultimately would like zero federal income tax. Please watch /watch?v=4rUn-aPvRSY . Look if you don't care for his policies that is fine but to make up stories that have no truth is wrong don't spread misinformation. In previous comments he said a flat tax is more fair than our current system.
@andreszuniga88 and here is the fundamental thing you dont get , any time ron paul endorses a tax break for the rich that money needs to be made up somewhere its not a tax break in the sense that the government still doesnt need to make up for the money the tax break gave to the big business,ron paul wants to have no taxes, but we have taxes right now and bills that are brought to increase tax on big biz ron paul always votes no on the increase , he also votes no unemployment extensions
he also votes no fundin for public education etc ,he votes no on things that wud beneift the poor, he votes no on spending that could help the poor like unemployment and he wants to end medicare and social security and he allows tax breaks for big biz, well guess what if he never allows revenue to be collect by bizness and the rich hes gotta either tax the poor or cut the programs they use or both, do you understand that very basic concept.
@samtotheg This country was built on the Constitution of the United States it never states that government should offer you health care, social security, or money for doing nothing. People need to take personal responsibility and save money to pay for this stuff, this isn't an issue about taking money from the rich to give to the poor, the system itself is flawed and to think the government owes you something or the rich owe you something is where you are wrong. Government is the problem.
@andreszuniga88 I think you need to look at grover norquiest pledge not to raise taxes or close loopholes and see yer boy ron paul as one of the guys who signed the pledge. government is the problem wow talk about throwin the baby out with the bath water, so when u see a shitty movies , the movies are the problem ,have u ever contemplated the guys in government is the problem, repubs and retards like ron paul who hold america back.
@andreszuniga88 hell yeah the rich owe its impossible to create wealth by yourself or in other words without the help of society taxes are your debt to society, you used to society to get rich ,you give back to the society, now if you dont like that you can not accept the taxes, then stop accepting money for your services suggest something else, and pay other people with something other money for their services or take a vow of poverty you wont have to worry about unfair taxes.
@andreszuniga88 and when this country was built slavery was legal, and there was fda to inspect food and or drugs so we wud have to do that ourselves if u had yer way , and there was no epa to make sure the air we breathe is safe ,no min wage, no paid vacation or time and a half for overtime etc there were no cars or airplanes and only 13 states..good thing the founders allowed the constitution to be AMENDED with amendments cuz times and circumstances CHANGE.
@samtotheg During the expansion of the United States there were no police stations set up, so the market confronted this problem when Wells Fargo would secure carriages for transportation. To think government is the only entity that can make sure we have clean food or air is flawed. People demand this and a private company that can be held accountable for mistakes would be created. The government cannot be held accountable and fails in adequately doing this and can be bought.
@samtotheg Yes the constitution was amended to reflect the change in society and was always meant to do this, so you are right about that. According to your logic why don't we all have the same income level then we wouldn't have to worry about rich and poor everyone would be the same and government would take care of us free housing, free medical, and free food. Guess what it has already been done and if you love that way of living Cuba isn't too far off the coast of the United States.
@whatisahumans Well that is why they dont give him money... Big corporations give huge "donations" to Obama and the other candidates. The biggest corporations and richest of the rich dont like the free market, they like the system we have now where they can get special deals, and big companies can lobby for regulations and people like Warren Buffet can lobby for higher capital gains taxes to push investment competitiors out of the market. ex: the HC bill was a huge givaway to big pharma. PEACE
@BigDaddyDJD btw im not getting trolled into having a debate on a YT comments section since I hate users who litter the comments trying to educate stupid people. So I'll end with this
"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.” -Murray N. Rothbard
He would deregulate us into an oblivion and libertarianism already failed TWICE in the real world.
I know Ron Paul sounds cool and "edgy" since your still on high school, college or just simply new to politics but the guy is a snake oil salesman and most politically competent individuals know his "cure-all" is simply bullshit in a bottle. Please don't start with me because I will tear you a new one libertarianfags. I don't want to make you look like a dumbass over the internet.
@VertSk8er12 You just made yourself look like a dumbass over the Internet when attempting to paint the honorable Dr Ron Paul as a snake oil salesman.. You may not like this , but once a person wakes up to what Dr Paul stands for they almost always are a fan for life no matter what.. Now watch as your comment is voted down into oblivion.. LOL!!
@VertSk8er12 Who would you elect then smart guy? Peter Joseph? Jaque Fresco? LOL
We need solutions not dipshits like you talking out the side of their mouths not knowing a thing about liberty and freedom. At least if Ron Paul got elected then corporatism would be done, and then us progressive can work further left. Thats the light i see. but you are much to small minded to see the silver lining of this man, no other canidate will give people as much power as him, you'd be wise to get it
@northwestblazinfire Corporatism would be done and so would civil rights! Ron Paul wants to make it legal for businesses to deny people service simply because they're jews, or blacks, or whites, or women, or muslims, or christians, etc.
Electing Ron Paul would be the end of civil rights in America. Ron Paul said he would not vote for the Civil Rights Act of 1964! That would give bigots and racists the right to discriminate against Jews and other minorities. Do not vote for Ron Paul!
@ViciousOneWon Why do you think anyone should forced to serve people that they don't want to serve in their establishment. If a person has an ignorant outlook on the world than that is clientele will be absorbed by people who do not discriminate. The mere fact that you are bringing the Jews into it betrays Zionist enthusiasm. Your main issue is that Ron Paul will cut funding for your unjust occupation of Palestine, and that oppressive cesspool you call Israel will once again cease to exist.
@ViciousOneWon Why do you think anyone should forced to serve people that they don't want to serve in their establishment. If a person has an ignorant outlook on the world than that is clientele will be absorbed by people who do not discriminate. The mere fact that you are bringing the Jews into it betrays Zionist enthusiasm. Your main issue is that Ron Paul will cut funding for your unjust occupation of Palestine, and that oppressive cesspool you call Israel will once again cease to exist.
@Ohrela I mentioned blacks, women, and muslims as well. Yet u focused on Jews. LOL Why would u focus on that minority when I mentioned many others? Ron Paul is a threat to all minorities in this country!
Ron Paul fights for what he thinks is "the good ol days" when bigots and racists could deny people service! LMAO That battle has already been won by the left! I just want to make sure people understand that a vote for Ron Paul is a vote to give bigots and racists more rights!
@ViciousOneWon In his 30+ years in congress when has he ever took a racist stance? The people in this country are stupid, and I am sure some people will believe the lies that coming out of your cock sucker, but people who become familiar with Ron Paul understand that his is for liberty of all people.
@Ohrela I laughed when I read ur post. People dont have to believe me because there are many interviews of Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul arguing that bigots and racists should have the right to discriminate!
U can call me a liar BUT VIDEO TAPE DOESNT LIE! LMAO If there wasnt actual tape of the Paul's opposing civil rights then u could potentially trick people into thinking Im lying. But video tape crushes ur Conservative cult every time! :D Those interviews r on YOUTUBE so u lose moron!
@ViciousOneWon Provide me with a link, or cite legislation that Ron Paul supported that encourages biggotry. Just because someone says something does not make it true. I am open to your point of view, and I am not fenced in to a conservative, liberal, or any other prepackaged set of ideology. Why do you make statements, and claim that evidence exists for your claim yet refuse to provide that evidence?
@Ohrela Ur response surprised me. Ur a Paul supporter that doesnt know Liberterians do not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964! Wow!
First take a look at justonemorename's response to my post. It begins with "Property Rights". He is a true Paul supporter because he agrees with Paul that discrimination should be legal!
Then, search the following on utube to hear Ron Pauls own words.
"Ron Paul Wouldn't Have Voted For The 1964 Civil Rights Act"
@ViciousOneWon Stating that he wouldn't have voted for the Civil Rights Act does not mean he supports racism, but people have the right to be racists, the same as they have the right to be Christians, Muslims, socialists, democrats, republicans, as long as in doing so they do not violate the rights of anyone else. You still have yet to provide legislation that Ron Paul supported that encourages racism. People have the right to individual liberty even if you don't like how they express it.
@Ohrela It is not illegal to be a racist but it is illegal to discriminate based on race, sex, color, religion, and national origin BECAUSE of the Civil Rights Act. Ron Paul does not support the Civil Rights Act and thinks discrimination should be legal! He admitted it in the interviews. If Pauls own words r not enough for u to understand that electing Ron Paul is a threat to civil rights, then vote for him. But most miniorities understand that a vote for Paul is a vote for discrimination!
@ViciousOneWon Yet you have nothing to substantiate your claim that a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for discrimination. What legislation did he say he would introduce that will cause discrimination? If a person owns a business that is their business and if they choose to be ignorant for whatever reason they have the right to serve whom they choose. Do you want a law for please and thank you as well. Ron Paul is a vote for individual liberty.
@Ohrela I provided VIDEO EVIDENCE that proves my claim that a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for discrimination. In his own words, Paul does not support civil rights laws and thinks discrimination based on race, sex, religion, color, and national origin should be legal in businesses that offer services to the public. U can ignore Pauls words if u want, but most Americans dont! Thats why he cant win the Repulican nomination or the presidency! Americans dont support racist rights! Too bad 4 Paul! :D
@ViciousOneWon I am not ignoring his words I am supporting his words, and the constitution. It doesn't matter what Americans support, it matters what the constitution says, because we are a constitutional republic not a democracy. If a business does not want to serve a people based on race sex religion or color that is there right, and exposing that about a business will lead to it's collapse. Many of the atrocities against the people of Russian began as the best interest of the people.
EVERYONE - Look at Ohrela's last post. He confirms Ron Paul thinks "If a business does not want to serve a people based on race sex religion or color that is there right"! Thats the truth about what Ron Paul and his supporters believe. If u think it should be legal to put up signs that say "NO JEWS SERVED HERE!" then vote for Ron Paul! LMAO
Sorry to bust ur bubble Ohrela, but most people dont like bigotry and racism. So the more people that know about Paul, the less that will vote for him! :D
@ViciousOneWon How does Ron Paul not supporting the civil rights act of 1964 because it was unconstitutional encourage discrimination? You still have not made the connection, and that is because there is none.
This has been flagged as spam show
Who REALLY runs our world? search "israel Did 911 All Proof in the World" and search "ZionCrimeFactory" for proof.
Reporting on the death of supremacist Zionist leader David Wolffsohn, the September 17, 1914, edition of THE NEW YORK TIMES tells us that during his closing address at the Zionist Congress at the Hague in 1907 Wolffsohn “pleaded for greater unity among the Jews and said that eventually they must conquer the world.”
w(dot)zioncrimefactory com/jew-world-order SPREAD THE TRUTH!
LordLindsey12 1 week ago
STOP CALLING IT MONEY AND CALL IT CORRUPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS GUY LOST ME WHEN HE SAID "UNIONS" TALK ABOUT CROOKED?
TheQuest2quest 3 weeks ago
long live ron paul!
deiselaewireless 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
~ * ~ * ~ *~ CALLING ALL RON PAUL SUPPORTERS! ~ * ~ * ~ * ~
Get your butts over to ronpaul2012 . com and donate generously. All Ron Paul merchandise proceeds go to the campaign.
Vote4RonPaulLiberty 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you are angry at the media, for ignoring Ron Paul and the American people let them know
FOX News room – 212-301-3344
FOX news radio 212-301-5800
CNN news desk 404-827-2751
CNN news desk fax: 404-827-3368
MSNBC – 212-664-3720
ABC News – 212-456-7777
CBS News – 212-975-4321
CBS News fax – 212-975-1893
napalmvoododaddy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This guy raped me and my children fuck you Ron Paul you COCK SUCKER
donoteathere 4 months ago
@donoteathere god must dislike you lol. too bad for you but Ron Paul is the Fuckin MAN
wobblyguks 4 months ago
@justonemorename Just when I think u might be sane, u remind me that ur a Ron Paul supporter! haha We can talk about this forever, but in the end u arent going to convince enough people that we were better off discriminating. Paul has already ruined his chances of being president because of his lack of common sense on this and other important issues. Hes already lost the rep nomination and the presidential race so theres really nothing to worry about! :D This conversation is just philosophical!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
Is he trying to take credit for this?
ForceCrystal 4 months ago
@justonemorename Racism has not ended. I dont think it will ever end no matter what we do, but who knows!
I do know that the Civil Rights Act has improved this country! Thank God!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@justonemorename asked "why do you keep sayin Jews woman and blacks?" NEWSFLASH - Prior to the Civil Rights Act business could and did put up signs saying "No Jews Allowed"; businesses could and did deny women jobs because of their sex; businesses could and did deny blacks service because of their color! Thats why I keep saying jews, women, and blacks!
Thank God for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and God bless America!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@justonemorename The more I chat with u, the more I get the impression that we dont disagree about much. It seems we agree that bigotry and racism is bad for the country! We just disagree about how to deal with it. Thats ok. Americans have already decided how to deal with hit - The Civil Rights Act of 1964! :D And history shows that our decision made the country better for millions of Americans. Ur way might have worked too. But why take the chance and risk more racism again?! :D
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@justonemorename I understand how u feel. Americans agreed with u about protests but they also wanted to do more AND THEY DID MORE by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964! Thank God! We saw the horrible effects that bigotry and racism had on our country and we decided to limit it and make our country BETTER! Good luck with convincing the millions of jews, women, blacks, christians, muslims, etc. that allowing discrimination again will be good for the country! LMAO Ron Paul has no chance! :D
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@justonemorename um...u totally lost me! LOL I think u meant to say that civil rights for minorities like jews, women, black, muslims "lowered our standard of living" and did nothing to improve our nation. Let me know if I misunderstood ur point. I think its very important for voters to understand what Ron Paul supporters think about civil rights! :D
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
There is no way to get money out of politics. Politicians make campaign finance laws and the current law make politicians rich! So why the hell would they change it?!
Campaign finance reform is a myth that will never be reality unless we find another way to make politicians rich without private donations.
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
So the Parties would have to fund Party members....no.
Salvysahagun 4 months ago
@justonemorename U didnt contest anything I said in my last post so I figure we agree on the points I made: 1. Govt is made up of people we elected; 2. The politicians we elected limited the rights of bigots and racists; and 3. Our country is a BETTER PLACE now that the right to discriminate based on race, sex, color, religion, and national origin is limited.
Let me know if u disagree with any of the 3 points I made, otherwise, I'm glad we finally agree! :D
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
Paul/Johnson '12
RoonGang09 4 months ago
@justonemorename As i read the "book" of posts u wrote, i got the impression that ur not a fan of democracy! U talk about govt as if its an alien that took over the country! NEWSFLASH Govt is made of people that were ELECTED!
The Civil Rights Act was passed because Americans saw discrimination hurt our country and we didnt like it. So we ELECTED PEOPLE to make our country better by outlawing discrimination. Its a better place now that the rights of bigots and racists r limited! Thank God!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
...BTW,the other alternative is "rosetta Stone"...learn 'Manderin'!!
bermudaguy1 4 months ago
Vote Ron Paul 2012...stop the insanity.
All these 'wankers' are doing is moving favors around. Your government is fuckin broken...fix it....we are the masses with the internet who don't like this shit!
bermudaguy1 4 months ago
mox news?
msnbc is like the biggest obama kiss ass in the world
msnbc is to obama as fox is to bush
both are a disgrace and cnn acts like they are in the middle bs
MrTheBeast 4 months ago
@justonemorename To think that without govt there would be no racism is INSANE! NEWSFLASH - Govt is made up of PEOPLE! Moron! And that is another reason not to vote for Ron Paul - he's that crazy old uncle with outdated beliefs, like racists need more freedom! LOL
To take away the rights of bigots and racists is to IMPROVE our society! That is a fact! Just pick up a history book to learn about how the lives of MILLIONS OF AMERICANS improved when the Civil Rights Act was passed!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
I like this guy's straight up, no nonsense approach
vargasls1 4 months ago
Ron Paul - a man who is not " bought and paid for " - register Repub to be able to vote for him in the primary in all states !
doogleandalix 4 months ago
Ohrela im pretty sure explaining it like that wont help much. You could have explained better by saying Ron Paul believes everybody no matter race or religion should be treated the same.
ramieiphone 4 months ago
I'm really behind all those Americans demonstrating to get back their American Dream. Go for it people.
However, I just hate hearing this Arab Spring nonsense. Let's get real. Their is and never was an Arab Spring. Iraqis, Afghans, Yemenis, Libyans, Egyptians, Palestinians, Pakistanis are all under the attack of America and people are dieing by the hundreds because of America and its minions.
I'm very thankful that the veto should keep America out of Syria. I hope!
ButterflyStorms 4 months ago
@ButterflyStorms
I know it may sound the same to most of the people but Afghans and Pakistanis are not Arabs... I agree with the rest you said in some level...
nadermhj 4 months ago
If you sit home waiting your turn you deserve to have your gun taken from your cold dead hands.
The Founders didn’t wait for the Brits to knock down their doors. They gathered at the green and stood up like men and they killed government employees all the way back to Boston.
What will you do when it’s time to hunt NWO hacks, republicrats and commies(“Liberals” and ‘progressives’)?
Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first. Then read my column ‘Prepping for Slavery’
waypasthadenough 4 months ago
Refuse and resist the negative influence.
Trust and assist the positive.
We don't need a solution, we need an end.
ninjatakedow 4 months ago
Ron Paul understands the problem is not the money, but the government!
SloterMFmeyer 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
help get ron paul on 60 minutes at change.org. sign the petition.
10,000 signatures is the goal.
bossrube53 4 months ago
Listening to Ron Paul and his ideologies opens my mind to how the world could easily be a better place.
AustralianAllTheWay 4 months ago
Dylan Ratigan, Respect.
Gilliatt83 4 months ago in playlist More videos from MOXNEWSd0tCOM
NOT PUBLIC. IMPOSE LIMITS!!!!!!
bgaudreau89 4 months ago
WTF ratigan not assaulting a Paul?
Garlannd 4 months ago
Glad to see someone giving Ron Paul some respect.
The only reason the dollar is still standing is because China is the biggest holder of the dollar. Otherwise, it would have been gone already...
Let's not forget that Saddam Hussein's greatest sin was that he was going to start taking other forms of payment for Iraq's oil. The central banks didn't want that, so they sent in their goons (the U.S. co-opted military, their strongmen) to take care of the problem. Same for Gaddafi...
ramura001 4 months ago 13
@ramura001 It's also a race to the bottom between the USD and the Euro.
If Greece, Portugal, etc, default, and the Euro goes down, Europe will become a USD sucking hole, which will absorb a huge quantity of dollars, an effective bail-out of the US, and license to Bernanke to print even more for his friends to spend.
CurtHowland 4 months ago
The Federal Reserve is going to occupy your ass!
XulChris 4 months ago
What a class act the good Doctor is!
micdailing 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The solution is not "HONEST DEMOCRACY", but small-budget-weak-president Republic where democracy is only exercised during election time and the president has no budget to give away as favors. In such framework, it does not matter who is "in charge", a socialist or neo-con.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ForLiberty888 4 months ago
I looked at Ratigan's proposed amendment. It's anti-liberty. It would forbid ANY private donations going to political campaigns. Which can only mean that tax money will be financing campaigns. If that happens then only those already in power within govt will decide who gets funding. It would insure that only pro-statists nominees would get campain money. Liberty defenders, like Dr. Paul, wouldn't get a dime. If it were in place 4 yrs ago there would've never been a r3VOLution. No Thnx!
MrPloppy1 4 months ago 17
@MrPloppy1 what do you mean by private? do you mean "private sector" private or in "secret" private?
collector842002 4 months ago
@collector842002 Private sector, including the little kid who breaks open his piggy bank to give $10 to Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, Obama, Perry or the Rent's-Too-Damn-High guy.
MrPloppy1 4 months ago
@MrPloppy1 Tax money would be financing campaigns, but the whole point of such a system is the money would be distributed fairly. They government would not be able to just fund whoever they like - the press would pick up on it, and it would backfire.
I don't like the idea of paying more tax, but it's the only fair way I can think of. I guess they could set up a system where people can donate and the money would be distributed evenly, but I think that defeats the purpose of these donations.
strakha0 4 months ago
@strakha0 Of course the govt can do whatever they want. Remember the bank bailouts? 90% of americans were against that, and they did it anyway. The press is owned by big corporations. You think they're gonna report on unfairly distributed public campaign funds? Look how they've been treating Ron Paul. He came in a very close 2nd in Iowa's straw poll. headlines read "Bachmann in 1st -- Pawlenty in 3rd." That's why Paul supporters are planning a "Black THIS Out" campaign fundraiser (moneybomb).
MrPloppy1 4 months ago
@MrPloppy1 No it wouldn't. It would ensure everyone gets the same amount. If you registered to run and got the nomination, you and your opponent would get exactly equal amounts of money. The Gov't wouldn't decide who gets what, that's pretty obvious.
mw2000 4 months ago
@mw2000 How's a candidate even going to get nominated? How are they going to tell primary voters "Here I am. This is what I think." Without seed money to communicate to voters noone would know who they are. You couldn't let anybody who says that they want to run for office have the money. There'd be a million ppl running for a party's nomination with their hand out. Somebody's gonna make the selecting, & it won't be the people.
Third parties? They gonna get a cent? They'll be 100% shut out.
MrPloppy1 4 months ago
@MrPloppy1 The US needs Soclalism, not liberty, if it is going to survive.
SteveAngelis 4 months ago
@SteveAngelis what???
nogoodnpg 4 months ago
@MrPloppy1
You don't understand how it works. Just look at the Canadian model for elections. Only 6 weeks long, every political party that is big enough, gets equal amount of air time and money. Although, like every ssytem it is not perfect.
Rsd79 4 months ago
And how many Paultards will factcheck this claim? None.
0hs0Zen0 4 months ago
@0hs0Zen0 Enjoyed Mouseland.....but I'm still going to vote for Ron Paul. What fact are you talking about? The PAC money? It's well known for years Paul doesn't take any....We don't have to fact check it.
peng1965a 4 months ago
@peng1965a MOUSELAND IS AWESOME. But Ron Paul does lie and tell half-truths. I will send you links and info to your inbox.
0hs0Zen0 4 months ago
I've never heard a coherent & informed argument against Ron Paul. Bring it on if you have one!
Ron Paul 2012 !
sotthapana 4 months ago
Ron Paul does not know the Occupy Wall Street agenda. All he's said so far is that he supports their rights to protest. He's also strong on ending the FED and ending these damn Wars. But, I haven't seen any protesters against FED or the Wars on Wall Street either.
Zalahblue 4 months ago
@Zalahblue I've seen End the Fed in the protests all over the place on alternative media. Lots of it.
peng1965a 4 months ago
@peng1965a Guess that explains why they are on Wall Street and not in front of the Federal Building huh? ◔̯◔
Zalahblue 4 months ago
Comment removed
peng1965a 4 months ago
@Zalahblue I've heard reporters saying there were protests in front of the Fed and at some branches. I don't remember if I've seen any video....
peng1965a 4 months ago
@peng1965a type in occupy chicago, or occupy "some city." its kinda happening all over.
collector842002 4 months ago
Ron Paul is an honest man who doesn't take money from corporations.
InCMPunkWeTrust 4 months ago
@InCMPunkWeTrust Both 'LibertyPAC' and 'RevolutionPAC' are corporations. He also has received support from the Republicon Party, which is itself a corporation.
Thank you very much.
PostSurgeOperative 4 months ago
@PostSurgeOperative Ron Paul supports the free market and freedom. not crony capitalism. nobody believes he is a threat. Dr Paul is just an elderly gentleman who wouldnt hurt a fly.
InCMPunkWeTrust 4 months ago
Ron Paul doesn't get the PAC money, he gets it DIRECTLY from the evil Corporations.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Corporations generally don't want Ron Paul in power and you can be sure that any large corporation would choose Obama over Paul.
hodoprime 4 months ago
@hodoprime - You're right why would they, he always loses. Ron Paul is the epic fail
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 He wins his district every time he runs. Giant corporations don't pay him money because they know he can't be bought. He stands firm on his principles. Under his presidency, monopolies will not be protected and EVERY bill that is sent to him for bailouts and federal contracts will be vetoed. I don't get how you can say that he gets money directly from corporations then change the subject without backing up your claim.
hodoprime 4 months ago
@hodoprime - then Why is he quitting his district?
clownporn1 4 months ago
@clownporn1 Is Ron Paul quitting? Not surprising. The Republicons did or were going to give him a big primary challenge in the last election. He may be quitting to retire or because he doesn't want to fight his own party anymore just to keep his seat.
xander7ful 4 months ago
@xander7ful - Ron Paul is known for two things: 1 - GOLD. 2 - FAILURE.
most of congress agrees with him, but he'll most likely get 0.3% of the vote at most.
clownporn1 4 months ago
@OldSchoolSkill Money is not the problem, it is a transparency problem. We could never have Ron Paul if we couldn't send in money. Monetary freedom is no different than personal freedom. Protect both.
DCUPtoejuice 4 months ago
END THE FED
DCUPtoejuice 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WRITE VOTE FOR RON PAUL 2012 ON EVERY DOLLAR YOU HAVE AND CIRCULATE!
SomeRusher 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp ok well im not. Im a former progressive turned libertarian.
onepiecefan74 4 months ago
Ron Paul: The Preservation of Liberty
watch?v=U4jXKd5Rr6c
No End In Sight
watch?v=ogkyNTSlBDw
and coming soon
I Rise
Please watch, rate, share, and subscribe, more movies to come...
:)
iTellYouNoLie 4 months ago in playlist More videos from MOXNEWSd0tCOM
The Fed is the source! End the Fed!
lb8825 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp not a republican
onepiecefan74 4 months ago
My congressman Cassidy promised he would vote against HR 2751 so I quit handing out hand bills later I checked his record and he voted FOR the bill. It was called the food safety bill reason it is so bad is becasuse I READ it and when you READ a bill you will not vote for it. The patriot act has a hidden TAX in it truckers have to pay $94x~,$138 twic and more for background checks people the Canadians nor Mexican truckers don't have to pay that ! They are putting tarrifs on USA citizens !
cdltpx 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp I'll take that as conceding the victory of the argument to me.
onepiecefan74 4 months ago
Ron Paul doesn't know how to sell himself.
He needs to bring up that he doesn't have a PAC and doesn't communicate with lobbyists at the debates.
boricuamm707 4 months ago
@boricuamm70& WRong Paul DOES have a PAC. It's called, 'LibertyPAC'. He also has a so-called 'Super PAC', which can receive UNLIMITED contributions from individuals and corporations, even shell corps, which means we will never know WHO gave, or how much or specifically when each individual contributed.
PostSurgeOperative 4 months ago
@PostSurgeOperative lmao your funny cause this superpac he ''have'' got less than $114,000 while mitt romney and others get MILLIONS
missjulievu 4 months ago
@missjulievu miss julievu one dollar or one million dollars taken from a corporation is not the point, this man does receive money from corporations , he is a scam artist this ron paul character is.
samtotheg 4 months ago
@missjulievu and the donations he got most likely came from his own grassroots supporters b/c we donate money everytime he need it.
missjulievu 4 months ago
The problem with what Ratigan is proposing is that it's going to lead to publicly funded elections, in other words, we are forced to pay for Mrs. Palins, or Mr. Perry's or Barry's election. The fed is the real source of the problem because it got these corps. so rich that they were the only ones powerful enough to use lobbying in their interest. We need more ppl lobbying for freedom to offset the fascists. Putting more controls on the process won't fix things, just benefit the big guys more.
ShatterNWO 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp Apparently if we want to use your logic.
onepiecefan74 4 months ago
I just signed. And I never felt better :)
biggydx 4 months ago
uploaded to facebook..
trthstrngrthnfctn 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp The banks that got bailed out! The same banks you say he gets backed from. If I listened to what I was told to then why on earth did I ever listen to Paul since every media source says he's nuts? See I actually think you have pre conceived notions and then admittedly make up facts to back up your view. Pretty pathetic.
onepiecefan74 4 months ago
thanks again moxy the best on the net!
487shawn 4 months ago
I will vote for Ron Paul if he pledges to make lobbying and corporate money illegal.
Stingerbillion 4 months ago
Man, if only Ron Paul would run for president;)
exiquio 4 months ago
We're gonna bail out Europe?! With what?!!!
circa81 4 months ago
@circa81 With the money we borrow from China.
airondee 4 months ago
It's the state that own the corporations not the other way around. They do it using the Fed.
kingcherub 4 months ago
@kingcherub That is an interesting theory, why do you believe that?
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela watch?v=Ta7q1amDAN4
kingcherub 4 months ago
@kingcherub That was very informative, a refresher in some respects but also filled me in on some specifics. I still don't understand how The Fed being owned by corporations, who also buy politicians through lobbyists, is an instrument of the state who they essentially own? Further more the Fed is not accountable to the state or anyone else, so I don't see how the Fed can be used by the state.
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela Obviously (or, maybe not so much so) I was using hyperbole. I just meant that the problem is not so much that the corporations are so powerful that they own the government. It is that the state, as defined as the entity that maintains a monopoly on the legitimate use of violence within a given territory, is the real power and it gets almost all of that power from having the ability to fund whatever it wants with money they can print out of thin air.
kingcherub 4 months ago
@Ohrela Also, it all a big cluster. It's nearly impossible to separate what is a private entity and what is a public entity at this level of the establishment. So, I hardly make the distinction. But, to me the situation we have now would never occur without the power of territorial monopolies on the legitimate use of violence.
kingcherub 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp He wanted them to all go bankrupted dumbass. I mean how weak of an intellectual are you? You admitted that there's no proof he gets donation and said you just made it up!
onepiecefan74 4 months ago
Ron Paul, your starting to piss me off. The guy is asking and asking about campaign reform and asking your opinion and you keep going back and going back to your talking point about the Fed. Have you ever heard of the concept of “the right time and the right place”? I want to hear your ideas on campaign reform now, talk about the Fed later. Campaign reform is, to me, the most important issue. Nothing else ever gets fixed until the politicians stop being owned by the wealthy.
dalecs47 4 months ago
@dalecs47 I think what he's implying, is that the existence of the Federal Reserve doesn't allow for campaign reform now. The Federal Reserve just prints money and if we had sound money, then the "lobbying" would not and could not get so out of control.
ThePelicans44 4 months ago
@dalecs47 If you can't see how the two are related, that's your problem, not his.
k2wannab 4 months ago
@dalecs47 Did you miss the part where he acknowledged the issue of campaign finance reform, but elaborated that the bigger issue is our debt based monetary policy? Did you hear the part where he said he doesn't get any Pac money so the lobbyists don't pay him any attention? Do you understand that the dollar is losing its role as the world reserve currency and already countries are trading with each other without purchasing dollars to do so.
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela Do you realize when the dollar loses it's role as the world reserve currency the 8 trillion plus that are held by other countries are going to flood the market in the US, and will become essentially worthless? Do you understand anything outside of media talking points, or do you just regurgitate what you are told to believe from your socialist progressive liberal box?
Ohrela 4 months ago
@dalecs47
Dr. Paul is trying to explain that a simple constitutional amendment won't solve all the problems. "We have to look at the big picture as well, there's more money in the Fed who buys out the special interests, so we eventually have to deal with that." He explains further, "We see a lot on the surface but there's money in the undergound." IOW, The whole monetary and economic system needs to be changed on a fundamental level. Read his book "End the Fed" for some insight on the subject
myhipsi 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp So you just making shit up if there is no way to prove it. His politics are consistant for 30 years. That is a logical deduction that he has not sold his beliefs. Who are his wall street buddies, names and evidence of affiliation please. It is unconstitutional to take peoples money and spend it as you please regardless of whether YOU think these programs serve a greater good.
Ohrela 4 months ago
What is that opening? It sounds like, "Hi, I'm Chucky!"
avariceichiban 4 months ago
why pay for something thats free?
skedaddleMLS 4 months ago
Campaign Finance Reform?! LMAO It will NEVER happen! Politicians make campaign finance laws and campaign finance laws make politicians rich! So tell me - WHY THE HELL WOULD POLITICIANS GETTING RICH FROM CAMPAIGN FINANCE CHANGE THE LAWS! LMAO It will never happen! Get over it America!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
WE NEED TO BE REAL CAREFUL WITH WHAT THESE OLD CORRUPT BROKEN SYSTEMS ARE REPLACED WITH - BECUASE THE PEOPLE WILL WIN OUT WE KNOW WHAT WE DONT WANT - WE JUST NEED TO KNOW WHAT WE NOW WANT - LETS NOT ALLOW THE BASTARDS TO REPLACE SYSTEMS WITH MORE TYRANICAL SYSTEMS.
PHONEYPOLITICS 4 months ago
Ron Paul agrees with the Citizens United decision. Ya, he's sure against the government being auctioned off. /sarcasm
bulldogger 4 months ago
Comment removed
ShadowSandy 4 months ago
@DidYouJustMakeThatUp What is your source that this has happened, did you just make that up?
Ohrela 4 months ago
CHEATING AT MONOPOLY IS ANTI AMERICAN
EsCurve 4 months ago
That's because the corporations know they don't have to pay him anything for him to go around shouting about cutting taxes and deregulating.
"This guy is dumb enough to believe our corporate talking points without any payment. Ahahaha" - David Koch speaking about Ron Paul
whatisahumans 4 months ago
@whatisahumans "Theres this guy, he watches youtube videos all the time and talks like he knows what hes talking about. i think his screenname is whatisahumans. ahahaha" -- David Koch speaking about whatisahumans
whocares9911 4 months ago
@whatisahumans thats bullshit.
BigDaddyDJD 4 months ago
@BigDaddyDJD Why is it bullshit?
Because you know it's fucking true but your own cognitive dissonance prevents you from accepting any piece of information that doesn't conform with your entrenched beliefs about your lord and savior, Ron Paul?
whatisahumans 4 months ago
@whatisahumans Yes thats exactly why Youve really hit the head on the nail there... omg smh
BigDaddyDJD 4 months ago
@BigDaddyDJD Please explain how CEOs and their big corporations don't love Ron Paul for championing tax cuts and deregulation to his brainwashed poor and middle class cult members.
whatisahumans 4 months ago
@whatisahumans Big corporations wouldn't love Ron Paul because they would lose subsidies, offshore tax havens, and corporate bail outs... If the tax code was flat for every corporation that would even the playing field, weeding out non-efficient companies supported by the tax code and subsidized by the tax player. Oil companies are subsidized by the tax payer to promote "clean energy" which is a disaster.
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@andreszuniga88 I know ron paul has struck a chord with you and he sounds like a decent guy but I think you are beleivin what you want to believe , ron paul was asked along with all the presidential candidates would you raise taxes by lower loopholes and he said NO,so ron paul would allow subsidies offshore tax havens BUT NOT corporate bailouts and ron paul would endorse a flat tax that would tax income tax the rich make money in others like stocks for example it wouldnt be fair.
samtotheg 4 months ago
Comment removed
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@samtotheg You are very much uninformed about subsidies please watch /watch?v=4BASVCCLA3A
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@samtotheg He is a libertarian and that means no subsidies leaving an even playing field for all people and let the market dictate who makes money not government policy, I think you should read up on libertarianism before making uninformed comments. In addition to a flat tax that would be the most even form of taxation the poor would pay a flat 5% for example and so would the rich so it would scale on income which would be fair. Capital gains tax is money you make on stocks by the way.
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@andreszuniga88 thats not fair becuase thats taxes on our income the income tax what we work for a flat tax is unfair for instance the poor only make money thru income and the rich have stocks and inheritance etc ...so the poor really pay 5 percent of their income and the rich do not , becuase they make money in other ways ,ron paul would have to end all the tax loopholes and he is not for taht period, so guess what thats not fair to us the little guy, sounds like a guy who is bs'ing to me.
samtotheg 4 months ago
@samtotheg It's obvious I would never win in this discussion with you since you make up false "facts". Your previous statement claimed he is for subsidies when he clearly isn't, now you say he is screwing the poor by providing tax loop holes? I provided facts for my statements now where are yours? If anything Ron Paul said he wants to eliminate the federal income tax so how is that providing tax loop holes when the tax would be gone?
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@andreszuniga88 so why did you throw flat tax thing in the discussion if he is for NO TAXES at all debate his policies at hand and stop side tracking people gettin people to engage in YOUR OFF TOPIC points,and sayin thats not what ron paul endorses , stick to what he is for.
samtotheg 4 months ago
@samtotheg In the previous GOP debates he said "what if we had a flat 8% tax but you have no entitlement programs and the government doesn't take care of you but rather personal responsibility" he ultimately would like zero federal income tax. Please watch /watch?v=4rUn-aPvRSY . Look if you don't care for his policies that is fine but to make up stories that have no truth is wrong don't spread misinformation. In previous comments he said a flat tax is more fair than our current system.
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@andreszuniga88 and here is the fundamental thing you dont get , any time ron paul endorses a tax break for the rich that money needs to be made up somewhere its not a tax break in the sense that the government still doesnt need to make up for the money the tax break gave to the big business,ron paul wants to have no taxes, but we have taxes right now and bills that are brought to increase tax on big biz ron paul always votes no on the increase , he also votes no unemployment extensions
samtotheg 4 months ago
he also votes no fundin for public education etc ,he votes no on things that wud beneift the poor, he votes no on spending that could help the poor like unemployment and he wants to end medicare and social security and he allows tax breaks for big biz, well guess what if he never allows revenue to be collect by bizness and the rich hes gotta either tax the poor or cut the programs they use or both, do you understand that very basic concept.
samtotheg 4 months ago
@samtotheg This country was built on the Constitution of the United States it never states that government should offer you health care, social security, or money for doing nothing. People need to take personal responsibility and save money to pay for this stuff, this isn't an issue about taking money from the rich to give to the poor, the system itself is flawed and to think the government owes you something or the rich owe you something is where you are wrong. Government is the problem.
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@andreszuniga88 I think you need to look at grover norquiest pledge not to raise taxes or close loopholes and see yer boy ron paul as one of the guys who signed the pledge. government is the problem wow talk about throwin the baby out with the bath water, so when u see a shitty movies , the movies are the problem ,have u ever contemplated the guys in government is the problem, repubs and retards like ron paul who hold america back.
samtotheg 4 months ago
@andreszuniga88 hell yeah the rich owe its impossible to create wealth by yourself or in other words without the help of society taxes are your debt to society, you used to society to get rich ,you give back to the society, now if you dont like that you can not accept the taxes, then stop accepting money for your services suggest something else, and pay other people with something other money for their services or take a vow of poverty you wont have to worry about unfair taxes.
samtotheg 4 months ago
@andreszuniga88 and when this country was built slavery was legal, and there was fda to inspect food and or drugs so we wud have to do that ourselves if u had yer way , and there was no epa to make sure the air we breathe is safe ,no min wage, no paid vacation or time and a half for overtime etc there were no cars or airplanes and only 13 states..good thing the founders allowed the constitution to be AMENDED with amendments cuz times and circumstances CHANGE.
samtotheg 4 months ago
@samtotheg During the expansion of the United States there were no police stations set up, so the market confronted this problem when Wells Fargo would secure carriages for transportation. To think government is the only entity that can make sure we have clean food or air is flawed. People demand this and a private company that can be held accountable for mistakes would be created. The government cannot be held accountable and fails in adequately doing this and can be bought.
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@samtotheg Yes the constitution was amended to reflect the change in society and was always meant to do this, so you are right about that. According to your logic why don't we all have the same income level then we wouldn't have to worry about rich and poor everyone would be the same and government would take care of us free housing, free medical, and free food. Guess what it has already been done and if you love that way of living Cuba isn't too far off the coast of the United States.
andreszuniga88 4 months ago
@whatisahumans Well that is why they dont give him money... Big corporations give huge "donations" to Obama and the other candidates. The biggest corporations and richest of the rich dont like the free market, they like the system we have now where they can get special deals, and big companies can lobby for regulations and people like Warren Buffet can lobby for higher capital gains taxes to push investment competitiors out of the market. ex: the HC bill was a huge givaway to big pharma. PEACE
BigDaddyDJD 4 months ago
@BigDaddyDJD btw im not getting trolled into having a debate on a YT comments section since I hate users who litter the comments trying to educate stupid people. So I'll end with this
"It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.” -Murray N. Rothbard
BigDaddyDJD 4 months ago
Ron Paul got $8 Mil. from about 100,000 donors, most likely none were corporations or super PACS. An Average of $80/donor
Rick Perry got $17 Million from 20,000 donors, most nearly all rich or corporate sponsors at an average of $850 a piece
Talk about an unfair campaign process!
Someone with 5 TIMES the supporters who want change and opportunity aren't as even as the greedy bought candidates like Perry.
#BLACKTHISOUT
October 19th Make this the biggest Campaign Day in History!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ConcealedTruism 4 months ago 49
@ConcealedTruism Yeah and when Ron Paul packs it up all the donations will be funneled to Rand Paul through the campaign for liberty...SMH
g2000m 4 months ago
Comment removed
ConcealedTruism 4 months ago
He would deregulate us into an oblivion and libertarianism already failed TWICE in the real world.
I know Ron Paul sounds cool and "edgy" since your still on high school, college or just simply new to politics but the guy is a snake oil salesman and most politically competent individuals know his "cure-all" is simply bullshit in a bottle. Please don't start with me because I will tear you a new one libertarianfags. I don't want to make you look like a dumbass over the internet.
VertSk8er12 4 months ago
@VertSk8er12 Saw your profile, you list Area 702 as your company. Do you live in Henderson?
ShittyMcPoopyBalls 4 months ago
@VertSk8er12 You just made yourself look like a dumbass over the Internet when attempting to paint the honorable Dr Ron Paul as a snake oil salesman.. You may not like this , but once a person wakes up to what Dr Paul stands for they almost always are a fan for life no matter what.. Now watch as your comment is voted down into oblivion.. LOL!!
PalmTrall 4 months ago
@VertSk8er12 Who would you elect then smart guy? Peter Joseph? Jaque Fresco? LOL
We need solutions not dipshits like you talking out the side of their mouths not knowing a thing about liberty and freedom. At least if Ron Paul got elected then corporatism would be done, and then us progressive can work further left. Thats the light i see. but you are much to small minded to see the silver lining of this man, no other canidate will give people as much power as him, you'd be wise to get it
northwestblazinfire 4 months ago
@northwestblazinfire Corporatism would be done and so would civil rights! Ron Paul wants to make it legal for businesses to deny people service simply because they're jews, or blacks, or whites, or women, or muslims, or christians, etc.
Electing Ron Paul would be the end of civil rights in America. Ron Paul said he would not vote for the Civil Rights Act of 1964! That would give bigots and racists the right to discriminate against Jews and other minorities. Do not vote for Ron Paul!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon Why do you think anyone should forced to serve people that they don't want to serve in their establishment. If a person has an ignorant outlook on the world than that is clientele will be absorbed by people who do not discriminate. The mere fact that you are bringing the Jews into it betrays Zionist enthusiasm. Your main issue is that Ron Paul will cut funding for your unjust occupation of Palestine, and that oppressive cesspool you call Israel will once again cease to exist.
Ohrela 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon Why do you think anyone should forced to serve people that they don't want to serve in their establishment. If a person has an ignorant outlook on the world than that is clientele will be absorbed by people who do not discriminate. The mere fact that you are bringing the Jews into it betrays Zionist enthusiasm. Your main issue is that Ron Paul will cut funding for your unjust occupation of Palestine, and that oppressive cesspool you call Israel will once again cease to exist.
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela I mentioned blacks, women, and muslims as well. Yet u focused on Jews. LOL Why would u focus on that minority when I mentioned many others? Ron Paul is a threat to all minorities in this country!
Ron Paul fights for what he thinks is "the good ol days" when bigots and racists could deny people service! LMAO That battle has already been won by the left! I just want to make sure people understand that a vote for Ron Paul is a vote to give bigots and racists more rights!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon In his 30+ years in congress when has he ever took a racist stance? The people in this country are stupid, and I am sure some people will believe the lies that coming out of your cock sucker, but people who become familiar with Ron Paul understand that his is for liberty of all people.
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela I laughed when I read ur post. People dont have to believe me because there are many interviews of Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul arguing that bigots and racists should have the right to discriminate!
U can call me a liar BUT VIDEO TAPE DOESNT LIE! LMAO If there wasnt actual tape of the Paul's opposing civil rights then u could potentially trick people into thinking Im lying. But video tape crushes ur Conservative cult every time! :D Those interviews r on YOUTUBE so u lose moron!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon Provide me with a link, or cite legislation that Ron Paul supported that encourages biggotry. Just because someone says something does not make it true. I am open to your point of view, and I am not fenced in to a conservative, liberal, or any other prepackaged set of ideology. Why do you make statements, and claim that evidence exists for your claim yet refuse to provide that evidence?
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela Ur response surprised me. Ur a Paul supporter that doesnt know Liberterians do not support the Civil Rights Act of 1964! Wow!
First take a look at justonemorename's response to my post. It begins with "Property Rights". He is a true Paul supporter because he agrees with Paul that discrimination should be legal!
Then, search the following on utube to hear Ron Pauls own words.
"Ron Paul Wouldn't Have Voted For The 1964 Civil Rights Act"
"Ron Paul vs Lawrence O'Donnell pt.2"
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon Stating that he wouldn't have voted for the Civil Rights Act does not mean he supports racism, but people have the right to be racists, the same as they have the right to be Christians, Muslims, socialists, democrats, republicans, as long as in doing so they do not violate the rights of anyone else. You still have yet to provide legislation that Ron Paul supported that encourages racism. People have the right to individual liberty even if you don't like how they express it.
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela It is not illegal to be a racist but it is illegal to discriminate based on race, sex, color, religion, and national origin BECAUSE of the Civil Rights Act. Ron Paul does not support the Civil Rights Act and thinks discrimination should be legal! He admitted it in the interviews. If Pauls own words r not enough for u to understand that electing Ron Paul is a threat to civil rights, then vote for him. But most miniorities understand that a vote for Paul is a vote for discrimination!
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon Yet you have nothing to substantiate your claim that a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for discrimination. What legislation did he say he would introduce that will cause discrimination? If a person owns a business that is their business and if they choose to be ignorant for whatever reason they have the right to serve whom they choose. Do you want a law for please and thank you as well. Ron Paul is a vote for individual liberty.
Ohrela 4 months ago
@Ohrela I provided VIDEO EVIDENCE that proves my claim that a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for discrimination. In his own words, Paul does not support civil rights laws and thinks discrimination based on race, sex, religion, color, and national origin should be legal in businesses that offer services to the public. U can ignore Pauls words if u want, but most Americans dont! Thats why he cant win the Repulican nomination or the presidency! Americans dont support racist rights! Too bad 4 Paul! :D
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon I am not ignoring his words I am supporting his words, and the constitution. It doesn't matter what Americans support, it matters what the constitution says, because we are a constitutional republic not a democracy. If a business does not want to serve a people based on race sex religion or color that is there right, and exposing that about a business will lead to it's collapse. Many of the atrocities against the people of Russian began as the best interest of the people.
Ohrela 4 months ago
EVERYONE - Look at Ohrela's last post. He confirms Ron Paul thinks "If a business does not want to serve a people based on race sex religion or color that is there right"! Thats the truth about what Ron Paul and his supporters believe. If u think it should be legal to put up signs that say "NO JEWS SERVED HERE!" then vote for Ron Paul! LMAO
Sorry to bust ur bubble Ohrela, but most people dont like bigotry and racism. So the more people that know about Paul, the less that will vote for him! :D
ViciousOneWon 4 months ago
@ViciousOneWon How does Ron Paul not supporting the civil rights act of 1964 because it was unconstitutional encourage discrimination? You still have not made the connection, and that is because there is none.
Ohrela 4 months ago