Norman Finkelstein and Alan Dershowit Debate Part 1 Of 11

[eastariel]

A zionazi is not a Jew. A zionazi is someone who uses Jews to shield himself while he plunders the world. He endangers everyone, especially Jews.

When you stand up for the Palestinians, the zionazis get mad. They hurt you where they think it will hurt you the most -- your reputation. So they have attacked Norman's reputation.

To a zionazi, image is everything. They will lie, cheat, steal, even kill to build up their egos.

They will even provoke their victims into attacking them, to look strong.

[JimmyJump007]

Dershowitz is a overrated scholar and I think he did a good job discrediting himself.

[WanaCare2]

I felt a camaraderie with Mr. Finkelstein when I heard him speak about how his mother continually analyzed the emotional painful situation she had been in during the Nazi camps. Although my father was not Jewish, he fought as a US soldier and was an emotional abuser of his children, cried extensively as he was an alcoholic and reflected every day on the horrors of the war.

[kurtilein3]

one thing to do:

there is a typing error in the title, so when searching for "Norman Finkelstein Alan Dershowitz" you find the other parts but not part one. in the title its "Dershowit" without the Z, can easily be fixed, and this video is still getting views so it should be worth the effort to fix it.

i think the same is true for part 2. apart from that, thanks a lot for the upload, Finkelstein is a hero!

[GreenMountains1]

Dersashit is a good lawyer no doubt but when faced with someone of intelligent in a real debate he looks like a fool and a liar with all his childish linguistic and propaganda games.

[1968THORNTON]

Mr Dershowitz couldn't spell the word debate ...oh..yes..lets..see..a..n..t­..i...s..e..m..i..t..e; its seems to be his only defence to the idea of debate

[fuzzbuzz239]

Incredible how Mr. Dershowitz always tries to hijack the conversation.

Argument: "Plagiarism"

Defence: Ad hominom attack.

Argument: Factual error

Defence: Typo

Argument: Quoting UN and Amnest International

Defence: Extremist, I'm gonna quote the IDF instead.

Argument: Misquoting George Orwell's Newspeak.

Defence: Changed the subject.

Incredible work Mr Finkelstein. It takes courage to do what you do.

[wovokanarchy]

@fuzzbuzz239 You must be an antisemite.

[fuzzbuzz239]

@wovokanarchy you must be related to Mr. Dershowitz

[wovokanarchy]

@fuzzbuzz239 Not at all. I am not and I am not Jewish. But I do know what antisemitism is when I see it or read it. Why is it you fail to do so?

[fuzzbuzz239]

@wovokanarchy You're right. Pointing out that someone is a sleazy debater means I hate Jews. Even if the person he's debating with is Jewish.

[wovokanarchy]

@fuzzbuzz239 Have you never heard of an self-loathing Jew before? hint hint.....

[fuzzbuzz239]

@wovokanarchy I'm going to assume you're joking about everything you said here. It's depressing otherwise.

[wovokanarchy]

@fuzzbuzz239 Of course. I'm taking the piss. Both sides have valid points. I just find it funny how the least criticism against a Jew or Israel somehow one is labled an "antisemite".

[t0kt0k]

Wow look how young Amy is here!

[strong8action]

@t0kt0k wtf? this was only 7 years ago.