wow i just saw , for the first time, tory magoo as a scientologist, on the street , with anons, its called scientology kills, by mark bunter, and how that dear woman has changed since 1999 i think it was made, she came out 2000. then she talks about 7 friends in the cult who killed themselves. its so distressing to watch the emotion in that womans face. it was watching this, that made me search for this freedom mag, and lo there was radiopauls vid, i learn something every day of this cult.
@RadioPaul1 my head is spinning, ive just watched david miscaviage being everywhere at once in freedommag, and smiling and loving and oh, my brain, my brain. i suggest everyone go to this magazine,a nd look what they think of the cyberhategroup called anonymous, and how amy scobee was put out by sexual misconduct, i have to lie down, im sorry, its all tooo much for me. lol
Actually, this particular troll has two L's, not one... vaLLarrr ...
She has been hanging around 4 particular videos, trolling people into meaningless conversations being unable to stick to the point. She is incapable of carrying a thought from one post to the next, always replies to only the most recent comment, and repeats the same irrelevant things over and over. If she is supposed to be a representation of Scientology, she's doing a horrible job however.
David Miscavige beats his staff, and L. Ron Hubbard was a conman who threw his wife under the bus when busted by the feds. What are you doing about it?
Families are being separated, and the story of Xenu is being kept secret from the low-level parishioners of Scientology. This is wrong. Are you planning to do anything about it? How do you plan bringing about reform to your religion's management?
@OpenComments I'll take your non-answer as an answer... she's not a chronic liar like you are. And you should know by now that I'm not impressed with moral judgments from moral lepers.
I'm not trying to impress you. I just don't see your need to not have a normal discussion with me. There is so much wrong with the organization of Scientology. It's like you think protesting the subject of Scientology and protesting the organization of Scientology aren't mutually exclusive things.
I want Scientology to be run better - why don't you understand that? Eliminate the disconnection policy. Don't charge lots for courses. Pay the staff accordingly. Stuff like that.
@OpenComments I want the US government to be run better, but I don't go around harassing people who speak to Americans and people who speak to people who speak to Americans. It would be insane to do so, just as it's insane for you to harass people on YouTube who you think might have had any remote communication with a Scientologist. You've already proven that you're a liar and a moral leper. The bleeding heart act doesn't work.
The difference is, the US government doesn't restrict people from receiving information. The Church of Scientology is rather restrictive in the information that its parishioners can and cannot see. Your data is incorrect when you say I am harassing people. I am only providing them with information that the Church of Scientology forbids them to see. This is cult-like behavior to restrict information like this. How can people make an informed opinion without looking at both sides?
@OpenComments Part of making informed decisions is checking your sources. Taking "information" from an obvious lunatic, proven liar and probable criminal (ie the intercepted email) would not be rational.
That's not for you to judge what is rational and what is not. It is ultimately the decision of the individual whether to make judgment on the information given to them. If I were to provide said individual information that forced abortions is a part of the culture within the Sea Org, citing 10 difference sources, that individual deserves to make the informed opinion. They don't deserve to be restricted from seeing it by Scientology. Hiding information is cult-like behavior.
@OpenComments People should consider all information and the sources of it. If they're just looking for something to hate, they might accept your "information" without further research. If they're looking for truth and they have any intelligence, they will look further than an inconsistent, dishonest and obviously biased source.
Consider this: If we really "hated" scientologists and wanted them to go to hell, we would not continue to get them OUT of scientology.
There is nothing hateful about caring for the women who were forced to have abortions, or about families separated from their loved ones because of the Disconnection policy. As I said, it is a very loving and human thing to do. This is something you don't understand yet, but hope you understand in time. Are you a good unbiased source of data?
@OpenComments Oh yes, of course, you stalk and spam and lie and harass out of the goodness of your heart. lmfao
I haven't set myself up as a source of information. If I did, I would be honest about who I am and what my sources are, and present info in ways that are not nonsequitur or conflicting, so it can be understood. I would not try to force info on people who don't want it, which tends to backfire, as you should have noticed by now. If presented sanely, some would want it.
I protest the human rights abuses perpetrated by Scientology policies. Unsuspecting people don't know what they are getting into once they join Scientology. What you call stalking/spamming/lying/harassing , I call delivering information to; information that a totalitarian cult does not want its members to see/know.
Why do you care so much about what I do anyway? You seem to be spending an awful amount of time trying to convince me to stop doing what I do.
Correction - you CLAIM I stalk/spam/lie/harass. What I do is open to interpretation by the individual.
Why do you care that I "stalk/spam/lie/harass"? What do you get out of it? Let me tell you that, what I get out of informing Scientologists about what the CoS does not want them to hear is the chance of them blowing. Blowing = less money for the cult = less money to hurt other people. It's wrong to con people, and that's what Scientology does.
@OpenComments As I said many times, I care because YouTube is a fun place to share videos, and you ruin the fun and sometimes drive away ARTISTS who actually have something to say, whether they could give a rip about Scientology or not.
Wah wah boo hoo. The emergence of the internet is ruining the fun of all Scientologists. Why stop at YouTube? Scientology has been at war with the internet since the alt religion Scientology days. Scientology believes they can bully people into taking down confidential materials, and even tried to DMCA google. Scientology is against the free information of the internet. You're not acting like a vigilante - more like a totalitarian leader preventing people from information.
You don't have the data to prove that I have no effect on Scientology, just like I don't have the data that I have an effect on Scientology. Is it going to stop me from trying? Of course not. Are you going to successfully stop me from informing Scientologists of critical information about Scientology? Definitely not. If I am a public nuisance to you, then ignore me. Otherwise, stick with neutralizing the valuable information I've been providing to Scientologists, handler.
@OpenComments lmfao, you want me out of your hair, just like decent people who just want to share videos want you out of theirs. Scientology is growing like never before. (Don't try the empty buildings lie again, I've already busted you on that one.) I don't think anyone's fretting about whether they'd be growing even faster if you weren't harassing people on YouTube.
The thing is, Scientology is NOT growing like ever before.
"One major survey of American religion shows Scientology declining in the U.S., however. The estimated number of Americans who identify as Scientologists rose from 45,000 in 1990 to 55,000 in 2001, then plummeted to 25,000 in 2008, according to the American Religion Identification Survey." - The Associated Press: Defections, court fights test Scientology, November 1, 2009
What data do you have that Scientology is growing?
@OpenComments lol, sounds like that major survey was done by you. There are more than 25,000 Scientologists just in the LA area. It doesn't matter, I don't have to prove it. To me, you look like a kid threatening to fill your pail with water and thinking the ocean is afraid you'll make it disappear. I hope for your sake this isn't your major goal in life.
Scientology teaches that in order to believe something is true for you, you need to see it with your own eyes. By this logic, the only way for you to know that there are over 25,000 Scientologists in Los Angeles, or if there are 10 million Scientologists worldwide, is to have met each and every one of those Scientologists within the range of 25,000 to 10,000,000. The fact that you say, "It doesn't matter, I don't have to prove it" is the elitist attitude taught by a cult, you see?
@OpenComments You're as likely to accept my information as I am to accept yours... not at all. Just sayin, if you think harassing people on YouTube is going to bring down the CofS, you're in for a big letdown, so I hope for your sake it's not your life's work.
Actually, as long as your information is well-sourced and explained beyond the reason of a doubt, I will gladly accept your information. There's one problem - what we both perceive as "beyond the shadow of a doubt" is different. As an example, you don't consider multiple ex-members of Scientology as proof that David Miscavige beats his staff - I do. I don't consider "It doesn't. I don't have to prove anything" evidence that Scientology has over 25,000 members in Los Angeles.
@OpenComments So as I said, we're not going to accept each other's data, and I hope for your sake that thinking you have an effect on the CofS by harassing people on YouTube isn't your main purpose in life.
Correction: I will accept your data if it is well-sourced and beyond the shadow of a doubt. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion about Scientology's management. I understand that you feel Scientology works for you; maybe it has saved your life. I don't dispute that. It's possible for Scientology to have worked for you, yet still have the opinion that there is corruption in how the Church is run.
L. Ron Hubbard said communication is the universal solvent.
Kind of ironic - maybe the Co$ should pay you for giving their toilet bowl rag all this extra publicity. Maybe the lack of interest in the rag is the laughably inaccurate name - call it Incarceration TImes and people will know it's all about Scientology.
Perhaps this Feedom Magazine is just for us, the wogs. CO$ members are limited in their use of the Internet, they might get ideas that the CO$ could not approve of. Just type S-C-I-E-N-T-O-L-O-G-Y on Google and see how much info you might get.
Come on zombies - support your own Magazine. Nobody else will.
Whoa, I've never been more umpressively underwelmed by any religtious group in my life. I'm so unimpressed I'm impressed.
You'd think Scilons would be interested in a Scilon magazine. 5 subscribers? Honestly? You'd think if the people who MADE the magazine THEMSELVES each subscribed to their own magazine's Youtube page it'd get, like, 7 subscribers.
Anderson probably laughed at these ding-a-lings. LOL, stat comparison, nice! 5 subs is pathetic. Freedom Magazine is so silly.. I saw one where it just had pics of lil Davey looking like a tanned dwarf at a podium and all their pretty "orgs". It's not really substance.
As soon as $cientology released that rag I knew that they'd shot themselves in the foot again. They just can't help themselves, they destroyed their own last shred of credibility.
All it's going to take is one more really big F-up like one of their members dying, or loosing it again, and it'll all be over. The media will eat $cientology alive.
The way $cientology is going I give them less than a decade. They corporation might not even survive the next few years.
OMG They are so fucking stupid. The stupid fuckers got caught RED HANDED with their fake bomb threat and they are now fucking with the CIA? media outlet? All it takes is for a jury to see the fake bomb threat video just once and theyre done. What a bunch of assholes that stalked over 10,000 kids with PIs to send them C&D letters, to their parents no less, meant to scare and intimidate them. Much like this is meant to do to Andy. They are organized, terrorize kids, they qualify for RICO.
@RadioPaul1 (the comment looked duplicated so I removed one and now the original is gone, too) enough to say that I am exhausted after spending all night awaiting approval of my snarky comment on the Freedom Channel - nothing still!
pathetic show
scientologymyths 1 year ago
wow i just saw , for the first time, tory magoo as a scientologist, on the street , with anons, its called scientology kills, by mark bunter, and how that dear woman has changed since 1999 i think it was made, she came out 2000. then she talks about 7 friends in the cult who killed themselves. its so distressing to watch the emotion in that womans face. it was watching this, that made me search for this freedom mag, and lo there was radiopauls vid, i learn something every day of this cult.
thefairlysimple1 1 year ago
IF YOU WATCH PLEASE VOTE
RadioPaul1 1 year ago 2
@RadioPaul1 my head is spinning, ive just watched david miscaviage being everywhere at once in freedommag, and smiling and loving and oh, my brain, my brain. i suggest everyone go to this magazine,a nd look what they think of the cyberhategroup called anonymous, and how amy scobee was put out by sexual misconduct, i have to lie down, im sorry, its all tooo much for me. lol
thefairlysimple1 1 year ago
I lol'd. Great video Radio!
b1p0l4rt 1 year ago
Actually, this particular troll has two L's, not one... vaLLarrr ...
She has been hanging around 4 particular videos, trolling people into meaningless conversations being unable to stick to the point. She is incapable of carrying a thought from one post to the next, always replies to only the most recent comment, and repeats the same irrelevant things over and over. If she is supposed to be a representation of Scientology, she's doing a horrible job however.
OpenComments 1 year ago
@OpenComments Except for the first and last sentences, this was a good description of yourself.
008firefly 11 months ago 2
@008firefly
David Miscavige beats his staff, and L. Ron Hubbard was a conman who threw his wife under the bus when busted by the feds. What are you doing about it?
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments It's the irrelevant trollishness that made me think of you. But I don't know this Vallarrr person. Is she also a chronic liar like you?
008firefly 11 months ago 3
@008firefly
Families are being separated, and the story of Xenu is being kept secret from the low-level parishioners of Scientology. This is wrong. Are you planning to do anything about it? How do you plan bringing about reform to your religion's management?
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments I'll take your non-answer as an answer... she's not a chronic liar like you are. And you should know by now that I'm not impressed with moral judgments from moral lepers.
008firefly 11 months ago 2
@008firefly
I'm not trying to impress you. I just don't see your need to not have a normal discussion with me. There is so much wrong with the organization of Scientology. It's like you think protesting the subject of Scientology and protesting the organization of Scientology aren't mutually exclusive things.
I want Scientology to be run better - why don't you understand that? Eliminate the disconnection policy. Don't charge lots for courses. Pay the staff accordingly. Stuff like that.
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments I want the US government to be run better, but I don't go around harassing people who speak to Americans and people who speak to people who speak to Americans. It would be insane to do so, just as it's insane for you to harass people on YouTube who you think might have had any remote communication with a Scientologist. You've already proven that you're a liar and a moral leper. The bleeding heart act doesn't work.
008firefly 11 months ago 2
@008firefly
The difference is, the US government doesn't restrict people from receiving information. The Church of Scientology is rather restrictive in the information that its parishioners can and cannot see. Your data is incorrect when you say I am harassing people. I am only providing them with information that the Church of Scientology forbids them to see. This is cult-like behavior to restrict information like this. How can people make an informed opinion without looking at both sides?
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments Part of making informed decisions is checking your sources. Taking "information" from an obvious lunatic, proven liar and probable criminal (ie the intercepted email) would not be rational.
008firefly 11 months ago 3
@008firefly
That's not for you to judge what is rational and what is not. It is ultimately the decision of the individual whether to make judgment on the information given to them. If I were to provide said individual information that forced abortions is a part of the culture within the Sea Org, citing 10 difference sources, that individual deserves to make the informed opinion. They don't deserve to be restricted from seeing it by Scientology. Hiding information is cult-like behavior.
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments People should consider all information and the sources of it. If they're just looking for something to hate, they might accept your "information" without further research. If they're looking for truth and they have any intelligence, they will look further than an inconsistent, dishonest and obviously biased source.
008firefly 11 months ago
@008firefly
Consider this: If we really "hated" scientologists and wanted them to go to hell, we would not continue to get them OUT of scientology.
There is nothing hateful about caring for the women who were forced to have abortions, or about families separated from their loved ones because of the Disconnection policy. As I said, it is a very loving and human thing to do. This is something you don't understand yet, but hope you understand in time. Are you a good unbiased source of data?
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments Oh yes, of course, you stalk and spam and lie and harass out of the goodness of your heart. lmfao
I haven't set myself up as a source of information. If I did, I would be honest about who I am and what my sources are, and present info in ways that are not nonsequitur or conflicting, so it can be understood. I would not try to force info on people who don't want it, which tends to backfire, as you should have noticed by now. If presented sanely, some would want it.
008firefly 11 months ago 2
@008firefly
I protest the human rights abuses perpetrated by Scientology policies. Unsuspecting people don't know what they are getting into once they join Scientology. What you call stalking/spamming/lying/harassing , I call delivering information to; information that a totalitarian cult does not want its members to see/know.
Why do you care so much about what I do anyway? You seem to be spending an awful amount of time trying to convince me to stop doing what I do.
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments Because you stalk and spam and lie and harass.
008firefly 11 months ago 2
@008firefly
Correction - you CLAIM I stalk/spam/lie/harass. What I do is open to interpretation by the individual.
Why do you care that I "stalk/spam/lie/harass"? What do you get out of it? Let me tell you that, what I get out of informing Scientologists about what the CoS does not want them to hear is the chance of them blowing. Blowing = less money for the cult = less money to hurt other people. It's wrong to con people, and that's what Scientology does.
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments As I said many times, I care because YouTube is a fun place to share videos, and you ruin the fun and sometimes drive away ARTISTS who actually have something to say, whether they could give a rip about Scientology or not.
008firefly 11 months ago
@008firefly
Wah wah boo hoo. The emergence of the internet is ruining the fun of all Scientologists. Why stop at YouTube? Scientology has been at war with the internet since the alt religion Scientology days. Scientology believes they can bully people into taking down confidential materials, and even tried to DMCA google. Scientology is against the free information of the internet. You're not acting like a vigilante - more like a totalitarian leader preventing people from information.
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments You have no effect on Scientology. You're just a public nuisance on YouTube.
008firefly 11 months ago
@008firefly
You don't have the data to prove that I have no effect on Scientology, just like I don't have the data that I have an effect on Scientology. Is it going to stop me from trying? Of course not. Are you going to successfully stop me from informing Scientologists of critical information about Scientology? Definitely not. If I am a public nuisance to you, then ignore me. Otherwise, stick with neutralizing the valuable information I've been providing to Scientologists, handler.
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments lmfao, you want me out of your hair, just like decent people who just want to share videos want you out of theirs. Scientology is growing like never before. (Don't try the empty buildings lie again, I've already busted you on that one.) I don't think anyone's fretting about whether they'd be growing even faster if you weren't harassing people on YouTube.
008firefly 11 months ago
@008firefly
The thing is, Scientology is NOT growing like ever before.
"One major survey of American religion shows Scientology declining in the U.S., however. The estimated number of Americans who identify as Scientologists rose from 45,000 in 1990 to 55,000 in 2001, then plummeted to 25,000 in 2008, according to the American Religion Identification Survey." - The Associated Press: Defections, court fights test Scientology, November 1, 2009
What data do you have that Scientology is growing?
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments lol, sounds like that major survey was done by you. There are more than 25,000 Scientologists just in the LA area. It doesn't matter, I don't have to prove it. To me, you look like a kid threatening to fill your pail with water and thinking the ocean is afraid you'll make it disappear. I hope for your sake this isn't your major goal in life.
008firefly 11 months ago
@008firefly
Scientology teaches that in order to believe something is true for you, you need to see it with your own eyes. By this logic, the only way for you to know that there are over 25,000 Scientologists in Los Angeles, or if there are 10 million Scientologists worldwide, is to have met each and every one of those Scientologists within the range of 25,000 to 10,000,000. The fact that you say, "It doesn't matter, I don't have to prove it" is the elitist attitude taught by a cult, you see?
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments You're as likely to accept my information as I am to accept yours... not at all. Just sayin, if you think harassing people on YouTube is going to bring down the CofS, you're in for a big letdown, so I hope for your sake it's not your life's work.
008firefly 11 months ago
@008firefly
Actually, as long as your information is well-sourced and explained beyond the reason of a doubt, I will gladly accept your information. There's one problem - what we both perceive as "beyond the shadow of a doubt" is different. As an example, you don't consider multiple ex-members of Scientology as proof that David Miscavige beats his staff - I do. I don't consider "It doesn't. I don't have to prove anything" evidence that Scientology has over 25,000 members in Los Angeles.
OpenComments 11 months ago
@OpenComments So as I said, we're not going to accept each other's data, and I hope for your sake that thinking you have an effect on the CofS by harassing people on YouTube isn't your main purpose in life.
008firefly 11 months ago
@008firefly
Correction: I will accept your data if it is well-sourced and beyond the shadow of a doubt. There's nothing wrong with having an opinion about Scientology's management. I understand that you feel Scientology works for you; maybe it has saved your life. I don't dispute that. It's possible for Scientology to have worked for you, yet still have the opinion that there is corruption in how the Church is run.
L. Ron Hubbard said communication is the universal solvent.
OpenComments 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NICE !!!
Videos of kids lighting their farts on fire have more views and subscriptions than the videos the cult produces
ChuckNorrisCutsMyLaw 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NICE !!!
Videos of kids lighting their farts on fire have more views and subscriptions than the videos the cult produces
ChuckNorrisCutsMyLaw 1 year ago
NICE !!!
Videos of kids lighting their farts on fire have more views and subscriptions than the videos the cult produces
ChuckNorrisCutsMyLaw 1 year ago
I think that 4 of their subscribers are Anons lol.
luvmaika 1 year ago
Nice work RP!
anonsparrow1 1 year ago
yes, I bet the whole of CNN and Anderson Cooper are now quaking in their boots at the hugely popular and influential freedumb magazine channel!
Perhaps if they allowed their few remaining cult members to freely look at the internet they may get, oh another 2 or 3 subscribers!
laserofjustice 1 year ago
Good job RP.
anonmonk 1 year ago
Short, to the point and very effective. Nice vid. Thanks.
MsBLiP 1 year ago
Kind of ironic - maybe the Co$ should pay you for giving their toilet bowl rag all this extra publicity. Maybe the lack of interest in the rag is the laughably inaccurate name - call it Incarceration TImes and people will know it's all about Scientology.
psyentologysux 1 year ago
Perhaps this Feedom Magazine is just for us, the wogs. CO$ members are limited in their use of the Internet, they might get ideas that the CO$ could not approve of. Just type S-C-I-E-N-T-O-L-O-G-Y on Google and see how much info you might get.
Come on zombies - support your own Magazine. Nobody else will.
Stay safe.
BK
Bkorczak 1 year ago
THEY HAVE 6 NOW
AnonKat 1 year ago
Hell, I had more subscribers than that before I figured out how to yse Windows movie maker properly.
dechha1981 1 year ago 2
@dechha1981 LOL!!!!!!!!
RadioPaul1 1 year ago
Whoa, I've never been more umpressively underwelmed by any religtious group in my life. I'm so unimpressed I'm impressed.
You'd think Scilons would be interested in a Scilon magazine. 5 subscribers? Honestly? You'd think if the people who MADE the magazine THEMSELVES each subscribed to their own magazine's Youtube page it'd get, like, 7 subscribers.
dechha1981 1 year ago 3
Great commentary. I can't believe that there Freedom Magazine site is so underutilized, incredible.
UNIVERSITYHI 1 year ago
Anderson probably laughed at these ding-a-lings. LOL, stat comparison, nice! 5 subs is pathetic. Freedom Magazine is so silly.. I saw one where it just had pics of lil Davey looking like a tanned dwarf at a podium and all their pretty "orgs". It's not really substance.
sha1indriaharam 1 year ago
You know those page views are all annonymous people looking for Sci stuff!
theanonwolf 1 year ago
Nice! "Expanding like never before"!
cultssuck 1 year ago 3
Well...I'm one of their subscribers :)
Scientolulz 1 year ago
i wonder if the guys handing out the little booklets could hear the laughter that must have been coming from Anderson Cooper's office.
laladiel 1 year ago
As ever, Paul, I always enjoy your excellent videos!
LOL @ 5 subscribers! They're living the dream and expanding like never before :)
TheEvilOfScientology 1 year ago
hahaha well done radio paul
SPGoblivion 1 year ago
You have more views and subsricers because you are awesome and they suck. XD
mollie2810 1 year ago
Gee, good thing OSA was three months LATE and don't got enough money to SUE CNN for telling the obvious TRUTH about the cult. Whew!
vaaLLarr 1 year ago
I always love your videos Paul!
whereisrinder 1 year ago
As soon as $cientology released that rag I knew that they'd shot themselves in the foot again. They just can't help themselves, they destroyed their own last shred of credibility.
All it's going to take is one more really big F-up like one of their members dying, or loosing it again, and it'll all be over. The media will eat $cientology alive.
The way $cientology is going I give them less than a decade. They corporation might not even survive the next few years.
Great video BTW.
sk8mike 1 year ago
They didn't even get their sea orgers to open a bunch of socks and inflate the hit count?
ThetanBait 1 year ago 6
@ThetanBait Yeah they are loosing it! The cult is dying fast :( Soon we wont have anyone left to play with.
RadioPaul1 1 year ago 5
Bloody hell paul I'v even got more than them LOL.
bodgerd 1 year ago
OMG They are so fucking stupid. The stupid fuckers got caught RED HANDED with their fake bomb threat and they are now fucking with the CIA? media outlet? All it takes is for a jury to see the fake bomb threat video just once and theyre done. What a bunch of assholes that stalked over 10,000 kids with PIs to send them C&D letters, to their parents no less, meant to scare and intimidate them. Much like this is meant to do to Andy. They are organized, terrorize kids, they qualify for RICO.
analyzingfunny 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
flyguy359 1 year ago
@flyguy359 Nice!
RadioPaul1 1 year ago 2
@RadioPaul1 (the comment looked duplicated so I removed one and now the original is gone, too) enough to say that I am exhausted after spending all night awaiting approval of my snarky comment on the Freedom Channel - nothing still!
flyguy359 1 year ago