Added: 2 years ago
From: HistoryKrell
Views: 23,509
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm a ford guy all the way but god dam it you got to give it up to chevy for this 1970 chevelle ss i would choose this over any car any day

  • im gonna cry...

  • love the long burnouts on the bias ply tires lol

  • this car is EPIC

  • HEY

    THATS THAT GUY

    WHO HOSTED THAT SHOW

    ON OLN

    WHO THE HELL IS HE

  • FORD SUCKS, GM FTW

  • the "true" love of a car (chevy, ford, dodge, etc,) is in a person's heart. why does everyone feel the need to say oh this ones better. thats bullshit! there's a lemon in everything evrybody makes!!! ESPECIALLY CARS!!! so quit hatin', and just enjoy these disappearing beauties. :D ALL OF EM!!!

  • It is a shame that this car was only produced for one year as a high-compression 454 muscle car. Despite that there is retro-styling today, we will never see cars like this again as they are plastic and loaded with computer chips. These old Chevelles are a very rare breed... makes me want to get a loan and buy one now!

  • @8LLRoadranger Except for the 2011-2012 392 Hemi Challenger, which produces 470 HP/470 Ft-Lbs and is naturally aspirated; and runs 124-12.9 bone stock.

  • @SOFSoldier No, that does not matter... Ford and Chevy have cars that can do that... there is a lot more to a car than the time it runs in the quarter mile... the Chevelle has character that NO CAR has today. That is why it is high-ticket classic muscle car... today's plastic molded, computer-chip cars just plain lack class, style, and the hands-on engine under the hood.

  • @SOFSoldier1 And 40 year after...

    Impressive? I dont think so...

  • stop shooting out all thses fancy numbers and just enjoy the freakin car

  • 1.00 is that a red fiero on that car n driver to his right?

  • Excellent post! Definetly got wood on that one!! Why cam't GM have a speciality division that produces these classics for us regular joes? They would make a killing!!!

  • Lol damn how old is this video

  • They made the SS Malibu in 1973, some even came with the 454.

  • There are more 1970 Chevelle 454 SS on the road today then actually rolled off the production line......lol

  • Car Craft,November 1969 issue tested an LS6 Chevelle and it turned a 13.12@107 MPH

    Super Stock magazine,Oct. 1969 issue tested a 4.10 geared automatic LS6 that had headers and slicks and turned a 12.69 @ 113.26 MPH

    ..and an LS6 car,with NO DRIVER,half tank of gas,spare/jack weighs approx. 3,750 lbs.

  • i loved my favorite chevelle 70 ss

  • In street trim with full factory exhaust the LS6 had to be tweaked and tuned to get it to perform like it should. A Buick GS Stage 1 was within a tenth of a second in 1/4 mile e.t. and that's with A/C, and power everything. You couldn't get any power accessories with the LS6. When Motor Trend tested the GS Stage 1 with no power accessories or A/C the automatic ran 13.38 at 105 mph.

  • 500 no way my 08 stang will run the quarter in 13.5 and i have only 320 hp....dream on

  • @ugslamma the thing had traction issues. Its tires were not all up to spec.

    But yea, the horsepower ratings are a little all over the place. Especially back in the '60's.

  • @beepandbop I must say I was a bit rude on my comment sorry,Beautiful chevelle 

  • @ugslamma it had 500 you have to remuber that car was a 2ton car

  • @ugslamma you're comparing apples and oranges : that's gross and net horsepower ratings

  • @Bag0fRats actually, these were rated horsepowers, and truth be told, where actually usually low balling the actually horsepower to keep government away. the reason that guys 08 stang can do anything is cuz his plastic and fibreglass car weighs less and because, despite my love for the carberator, electronic fuel injection is more efficiant, and traction control stop them from spinning out, which was a major problem with our cars. also, we used points ignition.

  • I think they mean crank power.. there's always alot of powerloss trough the drivtrain.. the 454 ls6 can put out more than 510hp at the crank just by blueprinting it.. have a buddy of mine who did this an dyno'd at 514.5 crank hp..

  • is he retard at 1:52 or what!?!

  • @chevelleSS396lover I agree, the thing did not have 500hp. It only trapped 104mph. Probably put down 375rwhp or so.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more