Added: 4 years ago
From: juliot37
Views: 1,673
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow - he says BUsh is functionally an Iranian agent and that he ought to be hung. I agree.

  • Do be careful when quoting or paraphrasing-with-references, as you did.

    .

    He did not say what you claim.

    .

    He said that from a Salinist view you can say "he must be an Iranian agent"

    .

    I'm afraid for this effort, spilt., it is nil pointes

    cheers.

  • Actually, not just from a "Stalinist point of view, but from Zizeks own personal view, and ANY objective view Bush's actions have strengthened Iran, admitted even by top military officials, so regardless of his intentions, FUNCTIONALY he acted in Iran's best interests, i.e. he functioned as an agent for strengthening Iran.

    Zizek says hanging Bush would be a CONCERVATIVE AMERICANS response, A Stalinist view would be that hes an ACTUAL (and not just a functional) Iranian agent.

  • Dear Sp.,

    mm, I think there is a gap between what he is saying in his lecture and the Real world; many of Zizek's followers are not students of political science, so for these others his illustrations are simply to relate an idea and the subject, is chosen only because it is something that we all can relate to as it is for all to access in media.

    If analysand spoke like this on the couch one would probably use a tape recorder rather that bother to decipher it longhand into notes.

    .

    Cheers.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more