Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fucking Amazing.. Stupid companies dont want to "RISK" any more dangers using other methods but their own yeah well theres 11 MILLION BARRELS OF OIL IN THE OCEAN I THINK WE SHOULD BE OPEN 2 ANYTHING TO FIX IT!!!!!.. dumb fucks..

  • See white feather test "apluseabsorbent Huckabee" on You Tube.

  • A+ absorbent protects habitat and wildlife by absorbing oil into it's cell structure there by isolating it from contact with wildlife and habitat.. Over a 2 to 3 year period microbes living in the A+ naturally will eat the oil. Slow consumption of the oil makes more oxygen availible to life in the short term. The fish also benefit by not being in contact with the oil absorbed. A+ has enough reserves to have absorbed ALL of the oil lost to date many times over. It has been listed by USCG for use

  • the oil gets soaked up and then the mix breaks down into an organic fertiliser? the oil isn't broken down....unless Monsanto recently made a plant with an internal combustion engine.

  • Why don't they use Shamwow!

  • @zvast If this not work, you get one absolutely free!

  • What are you planning to do AFTER the reed has sucked up all the oil? Fish it all back out? I doubt the oil soaked reed would do much good to the marine life, despite what Mr. Whiteside said about the 'animals being able to crawl on it, and the birds being able to sit on it'.

  • @PurPlum A Plus Absorbent can be

    contained in a pillow or boom when used on open water oil spills or skimmed off the surface for recapture. A+ not captured will break down the oil by microbial action over time, while continuing to hold the residual oil until it is all digested, finally breaking down into soil over the years. TCLP tests on used A+ Absorbent show it's safe in landfills, but it does not need to be disposed of, as it can be burned as fuel or used to enrich soil.

  • @boxa888 Thank you, boxa888. I know about your channel and great research for quite a while - you always seem so friendly, caring and kind.

    I personally suspect that Tesla's and others' inventions got supressed for not being exploitable as is the oil business -free energy is free, unlimited or at least nearly so- and maybe also because their inventions could be weaponized easily - and the self-proclaimed 'rulers' don't think humans or nations capable of such self-responsibility...they err :)

  • Comment removed

  • Typical of our government (as well as our society), use chemicals to fix the problem while all the time making things worse for another thing. Use what God has given us through the earth, not these crap chemicals we are pumping into the ocean, not to mention the other chemicals we pump into our bodies for medicinal purposes. God provided us with everything we need on this earth. USE IT!

  • @kircus87 Does that mean you're against the use of antibiotics? If so, how do you explain that in the stone age the average life expectancy was 40 years but with modern medicine it has been extended to 80 years?

  • @LMF5000 40 fun and productive years or 80 fucked up years?I'd take 40 any time

  • @sougamo When they had a life expectancy of 40 years they'd usually die in a pretty bad state of health. And it would be 40 hard years of spending most of your time hunting for food, growing food, making weapons and so on. Anyway, the issue is how kircus87 is against "chemicals". I for one appreciate how the things we take for granted nowadays are only possible because of chemicals. Take the smallpox vaccine for example. Or how leporacy is nowadays a curable disease. Need I say more?

  • @LMF5000 So for you a good long life is a life full of medicine and chemicals and a tv and internet,because you were born with all that already around you. In the stone age they didn't mind,u know? You die when you can't be useful for the community,that's what brought humanity to this state in the first place.

  • @sougamo I see your point about them not knowing any better, but do you think given the choice they'd choose to go for the "natural" option and die of a certain disease, or take a few antibiotic pills and be cured of it in a week? Same goes for TV and internet. Modern life is a lot more entertaining than theirs could have possibly been.

    And anyway, the raw materials for making the antibiotics or chemicals in question came from nature.

  • @kircus87 your words are true.

  • @kircus87 god provided everything on earth.. this is your argument yes? then didn't he provide the wisdom for us to use the raw materials he provided so that we could create the chemicals and medicines we use today... so by using the medicines and chemicals we are infact using what your god provided.

  • talk talk, i need to see proof that it does what they claim otherwise next...

  • @rzorNvme Please take a look at the other two videos. They are linked at the end of the video. These demonstrations show the capabilities of this product to absorb oil without leaking it back out. Gene Ferweda holds up a jar of healthy grass growing in used A+ Absorbent 2 minutes and 43 seconds into the WCCO video. This product has been used to remediate oil spills in the Duluth harbor with great success. More about this in the WCCO video, too.

  • Duluth!

  • BP doesn't want to clean up the spill, they want to harvest all the leaking oil. They would rather waste time looking for a way to keep the oil usable.

  • @IamApple Even though that may be true, this sorbent should at the very least be deployed to capture the oil near shorelines and entering the marshlands, since there less chance that oil of being recovered for use as fuel.

    If BP really wants to harvest ALL 100% of the oil, why are they burning it off the top? A+ would convert it to useful fertilizer, instead of just converting water pollution into air pollution. This can and should be used from top of the plumes to the shores, and even on shore.

  • Couldnt hurt to try it...it has got to be better than what BP is doing now

  • As they said in the video. BP is not answering their call, so far these guys have yet to hear from BP. Great product!! Great solution where the hell is BP on this?

  • Please politicians, scientists and corporations - inform yourselves about methods like these and get goinn'!

  • NIKOLA TESLA could have saved us from this 100 yrs ago! please look it up, he created a wireless energy system that allowed energy to be obtained anywhere on earth! i put up info on my youtube and i demostrate a 20 ft wireless transmission to prove that the system works! we could build it right away and get off of this oil dependence, you can run cars wirelessly and never need oil again. please read tesla's "increasing human energy" it tells you real clean energy

  • A+ keeps oil from contaminating birds and animals after application if recovered it is a renewed product for use as power plant fuel. US EPA approved used under approval of US coast Guard, if not recovered it continues to protect habitat from oil damage then it biodegrades the oil.

  • This absorbent is being tested by Jacque Cousteau's crew in the Gulf of Mexico tidewaters Thursday 5/20/2010

  • Well how about we start using something like this in the Gulf of Mexico, eh?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more