Fusion Podcasts : Professor Brian Cox (Part 1 of 2)

[samplecode]

Using Sun work stations. Haven't seen one of those in a while...

[sandustanBrasov]

SandustanBrasov

The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.

[sandustanBrasov]

SandustanBrasov

My brethren, you have capacity of to construct the thermonuclear controlled reactor, only that, you must needs let construct somethihg fuctional. The tokamak were invented in 1950 by physicists Igor Tamm and Andrei Sakharov inspired by idea of to Oleg Lavrentyev, when he studyed the realization of the hydrogen bomb. which has not need of magnetic trap, and thus, all the experiments were finished with the destruction of the tokamak installations in the central zone.

[DarklyBishop]

but what would happen to the oil company bosses? =( we have to think of them too!

[AClarke2007]

Perpetual Motion will give way to Fusion over time. It will be due to the requirements of solid-state power sources being classified - mainly for space use.

[muffin8or]

@AClarke2007

Perpetual motion cannot exist

[AClarke2007]

@muffin8or It`s a Human thing; it will exist while enough Humans want it to!

[muffin8or]

@AClarke2007

That makes no sense whatsoever.

[AClarke2007]

@muffin8or It makes perfect sense when you realize that the Perpetual motion process does not exist in the natural world. It will always take a Human Mind to maintain it. 

[muffin8or]

@AClarke2007 perpetual motion is motion that is self sustaining, doesnt lose energy or creates energy. If there is human involvement it isnt perpetual motion

[AClarke2007]

@muffin8or We will all have our own criteria for it!

[muffin8or]

@AClarke2007

Science is not opinion. Humans will die and become extinct and thus any motion supported by humans will not exist in perpetuum (it will not exist for ever)

[AClarke2007]

@muffin8or At last... you get the gist of what I am saying!

[muffin8or]

@AClarke2007

Fucking hell. Get this into your head. Perpetual motion = device that does not lose energy throughout time. Thus if maintaining motion depends on a factor like a human pushing it, it has input energy and loses energy. Thus it is not perpetual; it is simply motion. For instance 'Object A' needs 500j/s of energy to function. It loses 300j/s in friction. Bob inputs 300j/s by moving it himself. This is not perpetual motion as it will not last for ever (HINT: definition of PERPETUAL)

[AClarke2007]

@muffin8or Looks like I am going to have to remind you... we will all have our own criteria for it.

[muffin8or]

@AClarke2007

So your definition is that perpetual motion does not have to last in perpetuum and can lose and have input energy. Well why don't you just call that MOTION?

[muffin8or]

@AClarke2007

Science is not about your own critea.

Fine, I define particles as elephants who drink wine

[granskare]

All politicians think only of their own reelection, especially here in USA...Brian to me is the Carl Sagan of this century...:)

[davis3001]

Fusion is the energy of the future ! It is far saver than nuclear power now.. Yes give fusion developement lots more money !!!!