I believe in evolution but consider the big bang theory to be a joke. That has to be the biggest load of crap ever accepted by great minds across the planet. There is only one possible answer for the spontaneous creation of matter and energy. Key word.... creation. There must be a creator of divine elegance to create something from nothing. Just a seed I'd like to plant but what if God created us to evolve the way we did. What if his plan of creation was evolution.
@AvalonENT1 The Big Bang Theory does not address where energy originally come from. It only deals with the expansion of the energy AFTER that process. People mix up BBT and hypotheses like the Zero Energy Universe and Multi-universe.
The origins of the energy is not known, but a mundane reason is likely, as everything else seems to be explainable via such methods.
Also only creationists say everything came from nothing. While the universe 'created' itself, it referrs to formation.
@AvalonENT1 what occured PRIOR to the BBT is difficult to test as the current laws may not exist at that point. You could look into String Theory if you are interested in singularities and their possible origins.
creation does not mean a creator is intelligent. If water freezes, ice is created. Its a vague word that can be misunderstood.
Also consider how truly cruel evolution, as a process is. If a god did plan it, it was not out of love, or kindness. 99% of all species died out.
@AvalonENT1 finally while evolution does not disprove A god or gods, it does debunk religious claims about any personal god that could be considered 'good'. So a deist god, which can mean pretty much anything, including nature itself, might 'use' evolution, if you are a christian, think carefully before applying that process to your god.
Its like saying god uses earthquakes and plagues to shape our lives out of love.
Whats really sad is this guy in the video is not the dumbest guy you will meet defending his religious views. Even though he fails in every respect, there are others that fail worse trying to support their branch of religion. there are flat earthers out there...
I wonder if this guy made other videos about responses to this one?
Love the fact that the poster supports DrDino as a source of 'truth'. Its like a comedy show.
Dearest Dick Head.I have to agree with your statement '(or with YT's crappy system a 20% chance of getting a notification).'but this is youtube and to get any rational response would be futile considering the porn content here.Evolution means a lot to you I can tell and this is the same response I would expect from a creationist ,What the thinker thinks the prover proves.Replace thinker with PUNJAB.
Regarding your rant about galaxies colliding,I thought that space ,and I mean actual space was expanding, oh sorry adhoc inflating.The balloon analogy you lunatics love to flaunt.The cosmic microwave background ,the light elements bla bla bla..Give me an actual picture of a black hole and 1 observed experiment that could prove evolution
@FUNGUS869 "actual picture of a black hole" do you even comprehend what a black hole is? No light, so the only thing you see is the ring of matter that is being drawn into it.
"1 observed experiment that could prove evolution" I have one on my channel, scroll down the list of links you will find one on bacteria forming a new species.
@FUNGUS869 galaxies act just like stars or planets, they orbit other gravitational bodies.
While the galaxy is indeed expanding, these groups of galaxies are still held together by local gravity. Just like the earth orbits the sun. These orbits are VERY slow, but from what has been observed our neighbouring galaxy will collide with ours.
Ring galaxies are formed from these types of collisions.
@FUNGUS869 The eventual result of expansion is currently unknown, it might tear apart galaxies eventually, even planets and down to all matter, or it may not. Until more information is gathered about why the universe is expanding faster now that gravity is weakening at its origins, its hard to say what reprecussions will emerge.
Since we still don't understand Dark Matter or Energy yet, these may indeed be vital to knowing what happens in the future (and the past)
Hey dickhead I love science, the scientific method but you flaunt science like it is fact ,there is nothing wrong with the idea of evolution but how it started is another story .The Big Bang is a theory and for me a bullshit theory ,it is a Global money spinner though,and the Church of Evolution doesn't take kindly to Heretics.You say they are not related but the Universe is evolving ,please explain? Life...
I evoke the Power of Einstein ,Darwin and the rest of the Punjabs to prove the Myth of the cosmic soup and the universe being created out of absolute necessity i am not a creationist you assume just like science does it seems.
Are the laws of nature fixed ,and why are they not evolving?in physics we have reason to believe that in the 'Beginning' the laws were very different and Black holes and space unicorns existed.Lets through a bit of Punjab soup in and have an Orgy.Adhom all the way you lunatics.
@FUNGUS869 "Are the laws of nature fixed" The laws are not absolute because we don't have absolute knowledge. They seem constant in most general circumstances. scientific laws are man-made based on long term observation and testing of how the universe seems to work. However new levels of observation via new technology that allows more depth in testing can require modifications of those laws. Laws get updated as new facts emerge. This does not mean the laws are wrong, merely incomplete
@FUNGUS869 String theory does offer the concepts that the rules we think govern the universe may have not always been so, in certain circumstances. Just as oxygen is not always a gas, in certain circumstances.
@FUNGUS869 nice mindless rant. You might wish to press 'reply' to someones post though so we know who you are replying to, and that person gets a notification to reply (or with YT's crappy system a 20% chance of getting a notification).
MATE, YOU ARE SUCH A TOOL!!!!!!! SMALL, SHALLOW MINDED, BRAIN WASHED, MUPPET,
PLANETS ARE "ROUND" BECAUSE THEY STARTED AS A LIQUID, EVERY LIQUID FORMS A SPHERE IN SUSPENSION. PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE ME PITY YOU REALLY. SUCH AN UNFORTUNATE WAY OF LIVING. "GOD MADE EVERYTHING" YES OK, SO THE MYTH CREATED KIDDY FIDLERS AND ETHNIC CLEANSING TOO THEN, SUCH A FORGIVING MYTH ISN'T IT!!!!! WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!!
@thelevelheadedone Planets did not form first as a liquid. Who told you that?
The particles impact together as they orbit a sun. There are planetoids that are oblong.
Earth is not a perfect sphere, its a geoid, and its not even perfect in that regard. The blue marble effect is caused by the atmosphere and the seas. without those the earth is quite uneven. The core of the earth is molten iron (primarily) due to the heat trapped during its formation and pressure of gravity.
Mate, after an in depth conversation with a fish yesterday, I learned that they have evolved into a species of coherent thinking philanthropists with fins but they are stuck under water and have become suicidal. Surely this explains the "taking the bait of the hook problem"? Or maybe God just told them to do it!
Amoment of clarity you, you poor fool. You should read what the bible says about people like you. Do you know when you close your eyes for the last time the next words you will hear will be depart from me I never knew you prepare yourself for the devil and his angels, are you ready? It might happen on the drive to work or maybee in your sleep. You better make sure your 100% sure about your beliefs cause i gaurantee you the devil is real and you have been deceived i knowmthis because before i wa
@somearmyguy1 Ah, so when you run out of facts and have no evidence to provide, you resort to threats and abuse. Nice. Jesus would be proud of you.
You 'guarantee' the devil is real? How? Even christianity cannot decide if the devil is a servant of god or an enemy of god. You know nothing outside your bible. Keep your threats for your children you indoctrinate into your cult.
@isawrath Google "wildabeest evolution", read the scientific papers that are provided there from scientists from universities. It is an antelope of the genus Connochaetes. So it originally branched off from the ancestors of modern antelopes.
Fossil records suggest that the two species (black and blue) diverged about one million years ago resulting in a northern and a southern species.
@isawrath All science is under constant review, as the scientist that can overturn a previous fact or hypothesis will gain fame and sometimes fortune. However this does not mean current Theories are not trusted and considered valid. There are scientists that challenge current facts about gravity, but that does not mean Gravity does not exist or happen, only our understanding of it might require revision.
@isawrath Creationist 'scientists' created the term micro and macro evolution. There is no such thing. Evolution happens. They split it into these two vague catagories because they could not disprove evolution. So they pretend that biblical terms like 'kinds' is science. It is not.
And you now say that you believe in a young earth. This is disproven by the ENTIRE scientific community, and even many creationists like William Lane Craig admit to the old earth concept.
@isawrath "Where is this common ancestor?" to a wolf to a dog? Are you serious.
The most recent DNA studies have confirmed that the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) evolved from the wolf (Canis lupus).
Geneticists think the dog is closest in its make-up to the Chinese wolf. Ancient Chinese breeds, today represented by dogs like the Lhasa Apso and the Shih Tzu are regarded as the closest relatives of these prototype canines.
@isawrath "One genus transforming into another?" Once again you don't grasp what evolution is. There is NO TRANSFORMING. This is not magic like Jesus turing water into wine or feeding 5000 people with a small amount of bread and fish. This is real life.
They evolve TOGETHER. A new subgroup (which we classify) branched off from an earlier group. Both groups MAY continue to exist, normally isolated in some way to allow the branching to happen. We see that today with ring species.
@isawrath "God created life" There are thousands of gods, none proven. Until one is this is not a scientific theory, its a guess.
"Aliens created life" This is NOT a scientific theory. This is a guess based on conspiracy theories about atlantis and aliens building the pyramids. Stargate is a sci-fi program my friend not reality tv.
3) I never even heard of this one. Purely out of water? Provide a link to any scientific pape (or educational website on that.)
@isawrath "I am not retiring because "your proved me wrong" or you "shut me up"" I never said any of these things. "confert on their death beds?" I assume you mean convert? Hitchens didn't. Darwin didn't. Claiming your 'friends' did while you are 21 is unlikely unless you are friends with a lot of old age pensioners. I think you are a liar, just like so many other apologetics.
@isawrath "but it wont change the truth or the facts" my friend you would not recognise truth or facts if they slapped you in the face.
You have repeated shown total ignorance towards modern science. Your posts show only creationist jargon. And finally claiming you do not understand evolution (which your own posts prove) does not mean its wrong.
@isawrath "it ever turning or "Evolving" into anything." Do you realise that different cultures of man have ALREADY evolved different traits not shared equally amoung human beings. Certain medicines work better on certain racial groups because they have evolved different due to their environments. Ask ANY medical doctor. There are blood cell differences ALREADY between humans. Its call evolution.
@isawrath "humans came from the mammals" humans did not come from mammals. We are mammals, as we are primates. Thats like saying cows came from mammals. We evolved when the savanah in south africa and forced us to rely less on trees, and hunt more varied prey than just fruits and nuts. There were probably dozens of variations of man, but the survivers were US (we can barely stand each other, let alone a rival species).
@isawrath "where did the teeth come from?" Are you saying fish don't have teeth? Please check again. Where did teeth originally come from? From bone ridges. We can see various early fish with bone ridges, and these changed as they diversified. Small changes over millions of generations.
@isawrath "amphibians "magically" transformed into reptiles" First its not a straight change. Amphibians and reptiles could evolve together. Its not like they are unrelated. They are cousins. Amphibians did not stop evolving, all such creatures today are still evolving, but their branch has fundamental traits that we class as amphibian.
You can see how birds have evolved from certain dinosaurs by studying birds like emus and ostriches. flightless wings still useful.
@isawrath a transition from a simple creature to a more complex creature is not going from a worm to an elephant. This change is extremely gradual. Different species do not mean completely different creatures. So while a crow and a bear are different species, there are multiple different species of CROWS too.
What creationists cannot grasp is the span of time involved. They think a huge change suddenly occured overnight and a new species appeared. No. This is extremely unlikely.
@isawrath There are multiple possible theories on abiogenesis. The most popular one is that very simple life formed from its base components (nucleic acids and proteins) over 3 and a half billion years ago. This was not a WORM but something far more basic than even bacteria is today. Worms may have formed 2 and a half BILLION years later, because they are amazingly complex. All more complex modern creatures evolved in the last billion years.
@isawrath "billions of years ago-life....." From what you stated in this comment it clearly shows you have never read any book or scienific paper on evolution OR abiogenesis. You are getting all your info from creationist sites. You are making strawmen statements. There is no magic. Only creationists belief in magic and things suddenly appearing from nothing by magic words. Even the last catholic pope believed in evolution so its not just atheists that accept it.
@isawrath "I'm tired of coming back here every day" I understand that. No I did not read every post on this video. I went back and read 15+ posts you made recently and stated what I felt was the flaws in your argument. If I have an hour I can look back further of course. But even your posts to me show considerable mistakes even in understanding basic science.
@isawrath Evolution does not break these laws, if so then 99% of the scientific community would not be supporting evolution. PM me on how evolution breaks these laws (to give you a fair hearing). IF I can show that you are mistaken on them, will you reconsider your stance? IF I cannot show you an error, I will clearly state so.
@isawrath "Evolution is NOT proven" Only creationists believe that.
The scientific community disagrees with your statement.
Find any scientific university or department that works with biology and they will confirm that evolution is proven as much as science can prove anything.
@isawrath "Life does not make itself." Again you are referring to abiogenesis which is not evolution. You cannot even understand what evolution is, let alone how it works.
Go to my profile, look at the list of links in my profile for the one on abiogenesis. It shows a long list (which is now even larger than shown there) of scientific papers on the topic.
@isawrath "i've spent the last 9 years researching evolution" from your profile that would mean you were 11 or 12 when you started. So basically you did not understand what was in your biology textbooks then? What books on evolution have you read?
Creationism cannot be backed by science because its a faith claim. A basic hypothesis is falseifiable. A claim about a unknowable all powerful god is not falseifiable, hence why creationists say that god is outside the realms of science.
@isawrath The Spontaneous Generation Theory was the assumption that flies appeared from nowhere from rotten meat, or that mice appeared from nowhere from stored grain.
Pasteur did experiments that showed sterile environments stopped this and that other processes were involved to cause life to appear, thus the simple "life comes from life" quote. He was not addressing the origins of ALL life. Just that a complex creature did not pop into existence like adam and eve are supposed to have.
@isawrath "without breaking the laws of science" I have yet to meet a creationist that knows the 'laws of science'. What they claim is usually a corrupted simplified version of a Law (a term they don't comprehend either).
The Law of Biogenesis was to dispute (correctly) the absurd spontaneous generation theory that was supported by biblical canon. Pasteur destroyed the concept that a complex lifeform (mice or flies) appear spontaneously from nonliving matter. This is not abiogenesis.
@isawrath "matter-heat-oxygen etc etc and yet we've never had an animal come out of peanut butter." This is one of the most stupid unscientific statements I have heard, I think I heard Banana man (Ray) use it once.
Talk to your biology teacher who actually comprehends evolution. You are still young, you can still learn basic science if you actually go to scientific professionals.
@isawrath "Was the first creature that came from water use gills or lungs?" you make it sound as if its impossible for a fish to leave the water for any time. even today there are types of fish that leave the water, including lungfish.
"Did it run on the ground and then back into the water until it could grow legs?" It did not GROW legs. The fins became stronger over generations to support its weight on land. Animals do not morph at will.
@isawrath "Im tired of this pointless debate" I only started to debate you.
Now to the Darwin quote. If its about the EYE evolving? Have you actually read his book?
This is a FAMOUS quotemine from creationists. Its totally dishonest. The quote is half of his argument, the 2nd half of the page it was taken from explains that although evolution seems counterintutitive, it did happen exactly as stated. Creationists take the first half of his argument and never mention the 2nd half.
@isawrath Nothing has contradicted evolution Theory. A fact might be altered or abandoned but the Theory is not challenged. I think you really need to look at other Theories, to compare. Creationism vs Evolution is as scientific as saying Angels are holding our feet to the ground vs The Theory of Gravity, because its JUST a Theory.
@isawrath "1 theory 1 story 1 origins of man" First we do not know EVERYTHING, so various hypotheses are always put forward to offer options. These are discarded over time as the most successful hypothesis forms the basis of a new scientific Theory. Evolution had various versions in the 1800s, now there is only ONE. The individual facts vary as they get rechecked and new evidence appears. Science is flexible.
Creationism is not an alternative Theory to evolution.
@isawrath "if its factual and true" Wow, a creationist seriously tries that argument about science? There are thousands of denominations in christianity, they agree on almost nothing (bar some kind of god and that a jesus existed). Does that mean that you agree its not factual or true?
You don't even comprehend scientific terms. You compare science with religion (which I just reversed for fun). Science is never a religion. Evolution is part of science.
@isawrath "why do evolution scientist try to PROVE it and then fail?" I think you have been totally brainwashed by creationists. Evolution is proven, but all science is a work in progress and further research continues in ALL fields of science. There is no absolute claims in science. There is nothing that disproves evolution. Nothing. An individual hypothesis may be challenged and changed but the Theory of Evolution is now as certain as Germ or Cell Theory.
@isawrath "if it were sceintific fact then the WHOLE sciene community would accept it and it would not be debated still" Evolution is not debated still. It is accepted by the scientific community, even many devout christians who lead these projects accept common decent, even without fossil records support. The DNA has all the evidence.
What is debated is the individual facts, which get tested and double checked, as they have for 150 years. But all Theories work that way.
@isawrath You are welcome to post your best evidence for creationism. What I see is the same old tired arguments. Your posts show you have a lack of basic understanding about evolution. Do you even realise that if tomorrow evolution was abandoned it would add nothing to creationism. creationism is not science, it is guesses and faith assumptions.
@isawrath wolves and dogs. We KNOW historically that dogs evolved from early wolves, estimated at 12,000 years ago when they first became domesticated.
Wolves indeed have a structured pack, more than many others, but other creatures, including dogs and cats have a pecking order, have rules, have an alpha, etc. Its just not as evolved as shown in the wolves. All pack hunters, like hyenas, have similar traits, just not as well developed. They evolved these traits.
@isawrath From your demonstration about the wildabeast you have just demonstrated you have no knowledge of what evolution actually is. Where DO you get this information?
From creationist sites? Any trait can be specific to a particular species, it does not mean it never came from any previous ancestor. You keep thinking that you can compare modern animals with each other. Evolution never said that current animals came from each other, but ancestors of BOTH creatures.
@isawrath I have looked at dozens of your posts, you seem to be a nexus of creationist myths and pseudo science.
I have seen multiple fallacies in your arguments, appeals to emotion, appeals to authority, arguments from ignorance, arguments on popular opinion, etc.
You are not intellectually educated enough to put your point across. You build strawmen to attack, or focus on the wrong issue.
PM me with your best argument for creationism and I will demonstrate your flaws.
@isawrath "Theory IS a hypothesis" Evolution Theory means something completely different to the common term used by the public. All scientists and anyone remotely educated knows this. I learned this in school decades ago.
Theory = This is an umbrella term for explaining WHY something happens, and holds all the facts and hypothesis that are related to that question.
A hypothesis is a falsifiable explanation for HOW something works or happened. Evolution is ALSO a fact and a hypothesis.
@isawrath "HE IS GOD! Of course you cant understand him no one can." yet so many books are written declaring his/her/its will, and so many creationists think they know his/her/its works, methods, desires and so forth. Creationists have failed repeatedly over and over again to prove anything about their god. There is no real evidence for a god, only what resides inside the fervent imaginations of religious people.
@isawrath "entirely apart of the human species or the ape species" you do understand how evolution actually works, don't you. Its a branching process. Of course there would be cousins to the homo sapien branch. This supports evolution. It would be far more suspicious if we found no cousins to man. They are linked closer to man than to ape. Their ancestors were the same as ours, but we did not branch directly from their group, much like the boisei are a cousin, further back in time..
@isawrath Google "List of human evolution fossils" to see just how many fossils exist that back up the concept that man evolved from common ancestors with other primates.
We are animals. We are mammals and finally we are primates.
@isawrath "Darwin himself said it couldnt work." Provide the quote that proves he said that.
"they thought were the ancestors of man actually coexsisted with them at the same time"
Yes in the past when we only had neanderthal fossils the hypothesis was they were ancestors, rather than, as we know now, cousins of homo sapien. Science is not about absolutes, unlike religion. However this does not dispute evolution of man, it merely shows that it shared, rather than was, an ancestor.
@isawrath "all the findings and scientific research have revealed that the fossil record does not suggest an evolutionary process" Everything supports evolution. What you mean is that it does not support the creationists strawman view of evolution.
@isawrath Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus,Homo floresiensis, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Denisovans, Homo neandethalensis, Homo sapiens(humans) are these all hoaxes?
@isawrath YOU are an APE! What is so fuckin hard to understand? You are a transitional species. We DO have transitional fossils but you choose to ignore them. You think that fossils just poof into existence and are everywhere? The reason you don't see more is because a fossil requires precise conditions to form. I really hope your from the south because I like to believe insane people like you only live down there.
@isawrath No, they haven't been debunked. Evolution doesn't break any laws of science and no real scientist debate its validity. The only ones that deny the fact of evolution on right wing jesus freaks with an agenda. Don't you find it the least beat odd that the vast vast majority of highly educated scientists around the world except is as fact? Is it some massive conspiracy? Or are you arrogant enough to believe that you are more informed and better educated then them?
@isawrath I'll capitalize things to seem important like you. THER IS AN OVERWHELMING AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE INCLUDING FOSSILS DNA AND EVEN OBSERVED EVOLUTION. GET SOMETHING ELSE TO PREACH ABOUT LIKE ABORTION BECAUSE YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T UNDERSTAND SCIENCE
@isawrath It is indeed a fact and to deny displays astounding ignorance on your part. You want evidence? Try looking for it! Instead of clinging to pseudo scientists that regurgitate the same debunked crap over and ivermectin, go to a museum, read a book, educate yourself. You are being willfully ignorantl because ppl like u need the bible to be literal. If its not then to u god can't exist. Wake up
@isawrath Last point: you just cant seem to get your head around these key words. nothing is ever going to be 'proven', as that indicates it can be predicted. evolution is not a belief system. change over time is a fact
@isawrath When reffering to these stories of Noah's ark and other what i would call myths, you should read up skeptic / debunked theories on it. If you are rational and understand science, it becomes clear most of the time which claims are true, and which are false. It was the story of Noah's ark remains that re-kindled my curiosity for religion because i had always wanted to beleive in the supernatural but could never rationalise it to myself. On my seach, i became an Atheist
@isawrath And you think evolution between single cell organisms should happen at the same time as mutil cell organisms? Why whould this happen? You're concept is wrong
@isawrath I'm not from the USA, i'm from the UK where Church and State to use those terms is not seperate. Even though they are not seperate, they still teach Evolution. The same goes for the rest of modern Europe because we've gained enough knowledge to know fact from fiction
@isawrath I'm studying the Bible and the Torah just now strangely. If you take Genesis and Noah's arc literally then you are either uneducated or dillusional because they all defie logic and science and logic and science are what define reality. So if they are true, then they are not part of reality.
If you want to try and help me understand, compell me with evidence to support your claim that God exists without reffering to historical religious books.
@isawrath And may the flying spahgetti monster bless your life. I'm wondering though. If you know Evolution is false better than anyone, why not go and educate the Pope about how his former didn't know anything about Genesis because he accepted evolution. Why not go and email / speak to Richard Dawkins and prove his facts wrong? Science looks at evidence and lets the evidence tell what happened. There is nothing religious about science.
@isawrath The evidence is there all over the internet, science books. It's not my job to spoon feed you it, if you want answers you can study them yourself. Is there a theory that explains how the law of gravity works? Sure there is. It's a theory most people accept from science. The theory of evolution just explains how the factual mechanism of evolution works as best as we know using all the evidence. The pope even accepts evolution.
@isawrath If Science always proves creationism then why are all the best Bioligists around the world who know about life better than you or me support Evolution? You are either 1) A troll. 2) A liar 3) Niave. You are spouting nonsense. If Science always proves creationism why is evolution taught in school. Please do some reaseach on that question, then answer it. Also check out 46 to 48 chromosomes evolutoin facts on google and answer me that as well please. Defend your faith
@isawrath No no no no. Creationists say "it happened beleive me" without any hard evidence. All evidence which creationists have brought to the scientific community has been debunked. Evolution has been undergoing rigerous tests by science for the last 150 years and so far it's still not debunked. Evolution is a fact, the theory is how we explain how that fact happens.
@isawrath Creationism provides more asnwers? Come on, you have to be joking. Why is evolution a fact in the scientific community then and creationism is an outdated philophosy? When you know the difference between a Hypothesis and a Theory then i'll know you're almost ready for an educated debate
@isawrath Do you know how fossils are created? You keep asking all these questions which have been answered decades ago. Please educate yourself. Do some reasearch on Evolution before you try and debate against it because you're not bringing any new questions to the table of the educated. All of this is answered in the very basics of evolution, fossil records, historical facts
@isawrath A theory is not a hypothesis. A hypothesis is an idea or a suggestion about how something works. If you do some research on how a hypothesis becomes a theory and stays a theory you will understand more. All your points have been around since the 60's and in the 150 years since the theory of Evolution has been around it has not been de-bunked yet. Science and studying it provides answers. Religious creationism creates more questions than provide answers
@isawrath Are you an idiot? Evolution is a fact just like gravity is a fact. The theory of evolution is merely the best explanation we have for something we know exists. It is not a religion it is a scientific fact. Are people who beleive in gravity or the theory that explains it following some sham religion? If you think evolution "just happens" or things "just make themself" then 1) you need to study more on evolution 2) what you said applys more to religion than science.
@isawrath OK, think of it like this. Spanish and Italian languages both derived from Latin. Gradually, over a large amount of time 1 group of people started speaking Italian and another went off an spoke Spanish. There wasn't a Latin mother who gave birth to an Italian speaking child and a spanish speaking child, it the change in language happened very very gradually. You want some missing links, here's a few wikipedia(.)org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils#Human_evolution
@isawrath and Every time we find a missing link creationists go 'hey whats the missing link between those two?' do you want every single descendant from the common ancestor to be found for you to be believe evolution? and when you were talking about 'proof not evidence'.. you only get universal proofs through mathematics. All evidence is fact!
@isawrath im not saying that 4% doesnt make a difference im saying why do we have 96% the same? also we didnt evolve from 'monkeys' we evolved from a common ancestor between us and apes. Americans are generally immigrants came from europe a couple hundred years ago yeah? So why are there still europeans huh? its the same principle. there was a split. one group went to america, one stayed in europe. one went to apes, the other to early forms of man
@isawrath no evolution? so noah was carrying every strain of human diseases on his arc? He had HIV, avian flu, hepatitis, gonorrhea, ciphilis etc? Also make your mind up whether you label it a theory or hypothesis. A theory is an explanation which is backed by "a considerable body of evidence," while a law is a set of regularities expressed in a "mathematical statement." A law explains what will happen under certain circumstances, while a theory explains how it happens.
@listenup345 If that is the case, then why was it when creationalists were against evolutionists in court about saying who teaches what at school, the evidence was so strong to support the evolution theory that the creationists walked out before it had finished?
Sure there are still questions gaps but the facts that make evolution have not been debunked. Otherwise it would no longer be a valid theory.
@isawrath there is nothing 'higher' than a theory in science.A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing.
im an atheist and i dont think im better than religeous people. how you can say such things and call yourself a christian is beyond belief. you dont even know how to follow the teachings of your own belief system. you are a fucking retard not a generalisation of christians, just you. dont be so hatefull you're no more a christian than me. practice what you preach dickhead
This video is the definition of irony but it entertained me. You try and "debunk" facts that have been proven and can be demonstrated. You call Atheists stupid bastards, but in making this video you have demonstrated you are very poorly educated on the things you are trying to discuss. I feel sorry for you and anyone else gullable enough to be a theist when they have access to real, logical, rational answers.
This bullshit you reffer to is called science. You know, the same type of science that helped design those glasses you're wearing and was used to create that PC and camera you're using to record. You can answer these questions on your own if you can be bothered to look for the answers. I was religious once and i had questions similar to you. When i looked and examined the scientific and religious answers, the evidence and facts were easily in the sciences favour. I'm now an Atheist
EVOLUTION HAS BEEN PROVED A FRAUD IN NEW SCIENCE MAGAZINE.. ERNST HAECKEL'S IMAGES ARE FAKE. HERE: ‘This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud. It’s shocking to find that somebody one thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading. It makes me angry … What he [Haeckel] did was to take a human embryo and copy it, pretending that the salamander and the pig and all the others looked the same at the same stage of development. They don’t … These are fakes.’
Now if we always listened to everything our ancestors said and relied entirely on faith that they were correct. We would have no science, we would be hunter gatherers. You don't need to be a scientist but if no one was you wouldn't have any of the technology to publish your views. I don't hate religious people but I do feel sad when I see people who are forced (often by their families) into a religion they did not choose. I see choice to believe in what you want is key.
Question 2: We subscribe to the darwinian view that only genetic characteristics are passed on. If a creature "learns" to do something that will NOT be reflected in their offspring.
Question 3: Complex weather systems can be fully described by simple relationships but because the starting conditions are very difficult to measure accurately and the system is chaotic, a small change in initial conditions makes a large change in the outcome, it is very difficult to predict.
500 characters to explain why planets are round: challenge accepted.
Firstly spacetime exploded rather than any physical thing.
Gravity affects every particle in the universe. It draws them together within planets and stars. The particles within a non uniform shape pull the particles that are furthest from the centre of mass most strongly and the ones at the centre of mass don't move. To form a stable structure where this is the case, it creates a sphere.
FFS does he have half a clue what he is on about. And as for saying we call religious people awful names. Iwill happily adimit to calling arsehole creationists prats, but i dont have anything against religious people in general. As long as they are not trying to force their beleifs on me.
It doesn't have ANYTHING to do with wind, or motion, since there is nothing in space that could make that.
I would guess that it was gravitation, and the earth isn't completly round.
Now, why would a deer learn not to run infront of a car, when you die, you don't learn anything.
My parents where'nt christians, or jews, they are non-believers, atheists. Dude, why are religous people better than atheists, when you try to convert us all the time, disturbing our peace, and why are you making war?
You're the one who clicked on the video, dude. I agree with you, but responding to negativity is just as bad as causing it. I know you guys need to stand up for yourselves and I'm ashamed at the ignorance of my fellow theists, but at the same time you can't let this type of foolishness get to you.
@Elementer117 Thank you for that, and I'm usually not getting upset by theists trying to convert me, I usually just ignore them, until they call me stupid, "you make me sick" or other words.
Why should atheist have to answer these questions?
They are completely unrelated to atheism.
Please educate yourself on what atheism actually is.
Question1: Because the big bang theory does not explain the creation of planets, but of the universe. This guys know nothing about the BB theory nor cosmology in general.
"Other things about evolution" The BB theory isn't evolution.
Planets are round because of gravity, as I hoped everybody learned at school. This guy is a moron. Animals do evolve to anthropomorphic changes, look at islands where animals did not encounter humans, they are not scared of them because they have not evolved to be, everywhere else they run away at the merest sight of a human. Everything you ask has such simple answers, but creationists don't care, they like what they believe and they are not interested in the truth.
@InternetGuy1975 whatever you are claiming, until it is published in a peer-reviewed journal, you can't cite it as if it's proven. That's the way it works in science. You don't claim something has debunked another until it has been accepted into the journal.
@InternetGuy1975 "I was not claiming it as official" => you certainly sounded like it. If you are not, then you should end such claim with the phrase "that's my opinion". And also, if you claim big bang theory is just a theory, then it sounds like you don't quite understand what a scientific theory is, and how it differs from the everyday usage of the word "theory". There's a difference. A scientific theory doesn't become a fact, or a law. It is already as high as it can ever go.
I just did there now. Was expecting to find a scientific paper. But no, just a bunch of rabble written by creationists who don't know first thing about science and no doubt in their attempt to debunk something get their science all wrong and so express their ignorance on the topic.
What an idiot. Obviously uneducated. Smartass me in person like this, boy, and I'll slap your ugly fat potato head into next week. That will help you to evolve some common sense, perhaps, or at least some manners, boy. Now shut your uneducated mouth, you rude pig.
Words can not explain how anyone can be this stupid. For one thing, the Big Bang wasn't an exploding rock. It was an explosion of space and matter. and secondly there are people called meteorologists who's job it is, is to predict when and where cyclones and the such for and how they for. so really just WTF
it sickens me to think that in the last ten minutes I have found so many unspeakably stupid people. "those with a golf ball sized intelligence will have a golf ball sized knowledge" welcome to America
Round planets? Really? We really do know why. Too easy.. watch?v=Xxn3WEGFaxE&
Check out my Potholer54 playlist. He does a great job of explaining
Deer and fish. Evolution takes millions of years. Cars have been around for only a hundred. The physiology of deer and how much they can perceive at night plays into it. Fish are dumb. That's why you see them on dumb peoples cars.
BTW, Dr. Hovind, isn't a doctor. He's a liar soaking morons for their money. Well, not so much now he's in jail.
He doesn't bring up any valid points. To answer his first question: why are planets round? ANSWER: Planets are round because their gravitational field acts as though it originates from the center of the body and pulls everything toward it. With its large body and internal heating from radioactive elements, a planet behaves like a fluid, and over long periods of time succumbs to the gravitational pull from its center of gravity.
@Tris67 The only way to get all the mass as close to planet's center of gravity as possible is to form a sphere. The technical name for this process is "isostatic adjustment."
@Tris67 With much smaller bodies, such as the 20-kilometer asteroids we have seen in recent spacecraft images, the gravitational pull is too weak to overcome the asteroid's mechanical strength. As a result, these bodies do not form spheres. Rather they maintain irregular, fragmentary shapes.
[Zariyat 51:47] And We have built the heaven with Hands (the Divine Power), and it is We Who give the expanse.
{Anbiya 21:30} Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were joined together as one united piece, then We parted them? And We have made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?
--
here are the 2 Quran verses where God clearly stipulates Big Bang.
Gregrutz,
google "big bang model"; yes it all started from 1 single point.
Evolution doesn't say that when fish swim around a sharks eyes it grows a hammer head, it is the result of mutation, think of a carpet shark, it is relatively flat, one could easily see the transition between them and modern hammer heads.
A twister is a result of updrafts, these spin and gain momentum until they become very large...please do research before going onto camera and acting like an idiot.
People make fun of YOU on YouTube because you ARE stupid not because your beliefs
Lol
boycisco5788 4 days ago
This video made me stupider :[
LtActionCam 1 week ago
Before watching this video I never thought about and never really
Understood just how much misinformation is out there and how
Little so many people in our society have bothered to think and to
Learn about the world and universe in which they live.
So let us hope that some of those people will choose to
Honestly open their minds and take a hard look at the evidence
Instead of taking the easy path of not thinking and believing
Things simply because those things comfort them.
csmcmillion 1 week ago
haha i fucking love this guy
addicted2guitar90 3 weeks ago
The depth of this man's ignorance is, quite frankly, astounding.
LeonhardEuler1 3 weeks ago
I believe in evolution but consider the big bang theory to be a joke. That has to be the biggest load of crap ever accepted by great minds across the planet. There is only one possible answer for the spontaneous creation of matter and energy. Key word.... creation. There must be a creator of divine elegance to create something from nothing. Just a seed I'd like to plant but what if God created us to evolve the way we did. What if his plan of creation was evolution.
AvalonENT1 1 month ago
@AvalonENT1 The Big Bang Theory does not address where energy originally come from. It only deals with the expansion of the energy AFTER that process. People mix up BBT and hypotheses like the Zero Energy Universe and Multi-universe.
The origins of the energy is not known, but a mundane reason is likely, as everything else seems to be explainable via such methods.
Also only creationists say everything came from nothing. While the universe 'created' itself, it referrs to formation.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@AvalonENT1 what occured PRIOR to the BBT is difficult to test as the current laws may not exist at that point. You could look into String Theory if you are interested in singularities and their possible origins.
creation does not mean a creator is intelligent. If water freezes, ice is created. Its a vague word that can be misunderstood.
Also consider how truly cruel evolution, as a process is. If a god did plan it, it was not out of love, or kindness. 99% of all species died out.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@AvalonENT1 finally while evolution does not disprove A god or gods, it does debunk religious claims about any personal god that could be considered 'good'. So a deist god, which can mean pretty much anything, including nature itself, might 'use' evolution, if you are a christian, think carefully before applying that process to your god.
Its like saying god uses earthquakes and plagues to shape our lives out of love.
Such a god scares the crap outa me.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
Whats really sad is this guy in the video is not the dumbest guy you will meet defending his religious views. Even though he fails in every respect, there are others that fail worse trying to support their branch of religion. there are flat earthers out there...
I wonder if this guy made other videos about responses to this one?
Love the fact that the poster supports DrDino as a source of 'truth'. Its like a comedy show.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
Dearest Dick Head.I have to agree with your statement '(or with YT's crappy system a 20% chance of getting a notification).'but this is youtube and to get any rational response would be futile considering the porn content here.Evolution means a lot to you I can tell and this is the same response I would expect from a creationist ,What the thinker thinks the prover proves.Replace thinker with PUNJAB.
FUNGUS869 1 month ago
Regarding your rant about galaxies colliding,I thought that space ,and I mean actual space was expanding, oh sorry adhoc inflating.The balloon analogy you lunatics love to flaunt.The cosmic microwave background ,the light elements bla bla bla..Give me an actual picture of a black hole and 1 observed experiment that could prove evolution
FUNGUS869 1 month ago
@FUNGUS869 "actual picture of a black hole" do you even comprehend what a black hole is? No light, so the only thing you see is the ring of matter that is being drawn into it.
"1 observed experiment that could prove evolution" I have one on my channel, scroll down the list of links you will find one on bacteria forming a new species.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@FUNGUS869 hubblesite(dot)org/gallery/album/pr1995047a/
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@FUNGUS869 galaxies act just like stars or planets, they orbit other gravitational bodies.
While the galaxy is indeed expanding, these groups of galaxies are still held together by local gravity. Just like the earth orbits the sun. These orbits are VERY slow, but from what has been observed our neighbouring galaxy will collide with ours.
Ring galaxies are formed from these types of collisions.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FUNGUS869 "While the galaxy is indeed expanding" I ment universe is indeed expanding.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@FUNGUS869 The eventual result of expansion is currently unknown, it might tear apart galaxies eventually, even planets and down to all matter, or it may not. Until more information is gathered about why the universe is expanding faster now that gravity is weakening at its origins, its hard to say what reprecussions will emerge.
Since we still don't understand Dark Matter or Energy yet, these may indeed be vital to knowing what happens in the future (and the past)
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
Hey dickhead I love science, the scientific method but you flaunt science like it is fact ,there is nothing wrong with the idea of evolution but how it started is another story .The Big Bang is a theory and for me a bullshit theory ,it is a Global money spinner though,and the Church of Evolution doesn't take kindly to Heretics.You say they are not related but the Universe is evolving ,please explain? Life...
FUNGUS869 1 month ago
I evoke the Power of Einstein ,Darwin and the rest of the Punjabs to prove the Myth of the cosmic soup and the universe being created out of absolute necessity i am not a creationist you assume just like science does it seems.
FUNGUS869 1 month ago
Are the laws of nature fixed ,and why are they not evolving?in physics we have reason to believe that in the 'Beginning' the laws were very different and Black holes and space unicorns existed.Lets through a bit of Punjab soup in and have an Orgy.Adhom all the way you lunatics.
FUNGUS869 1 month ago
@FUNGUS869 "Are the laws of nature fixed" The laws are not absolute because we don't have absolute knowledge. They seem constant in most general circumstances. scientific laws are man-made based on long term observation and testing of how the universe seems to work. However new levels of observation via new technology that allows more depth in testing can require modifications of those laws. Laws get updated as new facts emerge. This does not mean the laws are wrong, merely incomplete
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@FUNGUS869 String theory does offer the concepts that the rules we think govern the universe may have not always been so, in certain circumstances. Just as oxygen is not always a gas, in certain circumstances.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@FUNGUS869 nice mindless rant. You might wish to press 'reply' to someones post though so we know who you are replying to, and that person gets a notification to reply (or with YT's crappy system a 20% chance of getting a notification).
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
MATE, YOU ARE SUCH A TOOL!!!!!!! SMALL, SHALLOW MINDED, BRAIN WASHED, MUPPET,
PLANETS ARE "ROUND" BECAUSE THEY STARTED AS A LIQUID, EVERY LIQUID FORMS A SPHERE IN SUSPENSION. PEOPLE LIKE YOU MAKE ME PITY YOU REALLY. SUCH AN UNFORTUNATE WAY OF LIVING. "GOD MADE EVERYTHING" YES OK, SO THE MYTH CREATED KIDDY FIDLERS AND ETHNIC CLEANSING TOO THEN, SUCH A FORGIVING MYTH ISN'T IT!!!!! WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!!
thelevelheadedone 1 month ago
@thelevelheadedone Planets did not form first as a liquid. Who told you that?
The particles impact together as they orbit a sun. There are planetoids that are oblong.
Earth is not a perfect sphere, its a geoid, and its not even perfect in that regard. The blue marble effect is caused by the atmosphere and the seas. without those the earth is quite uneven. The core of the earth is molten iron (primarily) due to the heat trapped during its formation and pressure of gravity.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
Mate, after an in depth conversation with a fish yesterday, I learned that they have evolved into a species of coherent thinking philanthropists with fins but they are stuck under water and have become suicidal. Surely this explains the "taking the bait of the hook problem"? Or maybe God just told them to do it!
Feltchmiester 1 month ago
Amoment of clarity you, you poor fool. You should read what the bible says about people like you. Do you know when you close your eyes for the last time the next words you will hear will be depart from me I never knew you prepare yourself for the devil and his angels, are you ready? It might happen on the drive to work or maybee in your sleep. You better make sure your 100% sure about your beliefs cause i gaurantee you the devil is real and you have been deceived i knowmthis because before i wa
somearmyguy1 1 month ago
@somearmyguy1 Yes... read what the Bible says! because everything in the Bible is the truth.
You realise that they have found the first page of the Bible in the Dead sea scrolls.
It says the following....
"All characters appearing in this work are fictitious. Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental."
thelevelheadedone 1 month ago
@somearmyguy1 Ah, so when you run out of facts and have no evidence to provide, you resort to threats and abuse. Nice. Jesus would be proud of you.
You 'guarantee' the devil is real? How? Even christianity cannot decide if the devil is a servant of god or an enemy of god. You know nothing outside your bible. Keep your threats for your children you indoctrinate into your cult.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath Wildabeests are Gnus which belong to the family Bovidae, which includes antelopes, cattle, goats, and other even-toed horned ungulates.
You can see the list of ancestor possibilities just by understanding its scientific placement in the animal kingdom.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
Comment removed
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath Google "wildabeest evolution", read the scientific papers that are provided there from scientists from universities. It is an antelope of the genus Connochaetes. So it originally branched off from the ancestors of modern antelopes.
Fossil records suggest that the two species (black and blue) diverged about one million years ago resulting in a northern and a southern species.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath All science is under constant review, as the scientist that can overturn a previous fact or hypothesis will gain fame and sometimes fortune. However this does not mean current Theories are not trusted and considered valid. There are scientists that challenge current facts about gravity, but that does not mean Gravity does not exist or happen, only our understanding of it might require revision.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath Creationist 'scientists' created the term micro and macro evolution. There is no such thing. Evolution happens. They split it into these two vague catagories because they could not disprove evolution. So they pretend that biblical terms like 'kinds' is science. It is not.
And you now say that you believe in a young earth. This is disproven by the ENTIRE scientific community, and even many creationists like William Lane Craig admit to the old earth concept.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "Where is this common ancestor?" to a wolf to a dog? Are you serious.
The most recent DNA studies have confirmed that the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) evolved from the wolf (Canis lupus).
Geneticists think the dog is closest in its make-up to the Chinese wolf. Ancient Chinese breeds, today represented by dogs like the Lhasa Apso and the Shih Tzu are regarded as the closest relatives of these prototype canines.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "One genus transforming into another?" Once again you don't grasp what evolution is. There is NO TRANSFORMING. This is not magic like Jesus turing water into wine or feeding 5000 people with a small amount of bread and fish. This is real life.
They evolve TOGETHER. A new subgroup (which we classify) branched off from an earlier group. Both groups MAY continue to exist, normally isolated in some way to allow the branching to happen. We see that today with ring species.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "God created life" There are thousands of gods, none proven. Until one is this is not a scientific theory, its a guess.
"Aliens created life" This is NOT a scientific theory. This is a guess based on conspiracy theories about atlantis and aliens building the pyramids. Stargate is a sci-fi program my friend not reality tv.
3) I never even heard of this one. Purely out of water? Provide a link to any scientific pape (or educational website on that.)
4) This is the same as 1
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "I am not retiring because "your proved me wrong" or you "shut me up"" I never said any of these things. "confert on their death beds?" I assume you mean convert? Hitchens didn't. Darwin didn't. Claiming your 'friends' did while you are 21 is unlikely unless you are friends with a lot of old age pensioners. I think you are a liar, just like so many other apologetics.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "but it wont change the truth or the facts" my friend you would not recognise truth or facts if they slapped you in the face.
You have repeated shown total ignorance towards modern science. Your posts show only creationist jargon. And finally claiming you do not understand evolution (which your own posts prove) does not mean its wrong.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "it ever turning or "Evolving" into anything." Do you realise that different cultures of man have ALREADY evolved different traits not shared equally amoung human beings. Certain medicines work better on certain racial groups because they have evolved different due to their environments. Ask ANY medical doctor. There are blood cell differences ALREADY between humans. Its call evolution.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "humans came from the mammals" humans did not come from mammals. We are mammals, as we are primates. Thats like saying cows came from mammals. We evolved when the savanah in south africa and forced us to rely less on trees, and hunt more varied prey than just fruits and nuts. There were probably dozens of variations of man, but the survivers were US (we can barely stand each other, let alone a rival species).
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "where did the teeth come from?" Are you saying fish don't have teeth? Please check again. Where did teeth originally come from? From bone ridges. We can see various early fish with bone ridges, and these changed as they diversified. Small changes over millions of generations.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "amphibians "magically" transformed into reptiles" First its not a straight change. Amphibians and reptiles could evolve together. Its not like they are unrelated. They are cousins. Amphibians did not stop evolving, all such creatures today are still evolving, but their branch has fundamental traits that we class as amphibian.
You can see how birds have evolved from certain dinosaurs by studying birds like emus and ostriches. flightless wings still useful.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath a transition from a simple creature to a more complex creature is not going from a worm to an elephant. This change is extremely gradual. Different species do not mean completely different creatures. So while a crow and a bear are different species, there are multiple different species of CROWS too.
What creationists cannot grasp is the span of time involved. They think a huge change suddenly occured overnight and a new species appeared. No. This is extremely unlikely.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath There are multiple possible theories on abiogenesis. The most popular one is that very simple life formed from its base components (nucleic acids and proteins) over 3 and a half billion years ago. This was not a WORM but something far more basic than even bacteria is today. Worms may have formed 2 and a half BILLION years later, because they are amazingly complex. All more complex modern creatures evolved in the last billion years.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "billions of years ago-life....." From what you stated in this comment it clearly shows you have never read any book or scienific paper on evolution OR abiogenesis. You are getting all your info from creationist sites. You are making strawmen statements. There is no magic. Only creationists belief in magic and things suddenly appearing from nothing by magic words. Even the last catholic pope believed in evolution so its not just atheists that accept it.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "I'm tired of coming back here every day" I understand that. No I did not read every post on this video. I went back and read 15+ posts you made recently and stated what I felt was the flaws in your argument. If I have an hour I can look back further of course. But even your posts to me show considerable mistakes even in understanding basic science.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath Evolution does not break these laws, if so then 99% of the scientific community would not be supporting evolution. PM me on how evolution breaks these laws (to give you a fair hearing). IF I can show that you are mistaken on them, will you reconsider your stance? IF I cannot show you an error, I will clearly state so.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
Comment removed
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "Evolution is NOT proven" Only creationists believe that.
The scientific community disagrees with your statement.
Find any scientific university or department that works with biology and they will confirm that evolution is proven as much as science can prove anything.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "Life does not make itself." Again you are referring to abiogenesis which is not evolution. You cannot even understand what evolution is, let alone how it works.
Go to my profile, look at the list of links in my profile for the one on abiogenesis. It shows a long list (which is now even larger than shown there) of scientific papers on the topic.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "i've spent the last 9 years researching evolution" from your profile that would mean you were 11 or 12 when you started. So basically you did not understand what was in your biology textbooks then? What books on evolution have you read?
Creationism cannot be backed by science because its a faith claim. A basic hypothesis is falseifiable. A claim about a unknowable all powerful god is not falseifiable, hence why creationists say that god is outside the realms of science.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath The Spontaneous Generation Theory was the assumption that flies appeared from nowhere from rotten meat, or that mice appeared from nowhere from stored grain.
Pasteur did experiments that showed sterile environments stopped this and that other processes were involved to cause life to appear, thus the simple "life comes from life" quote. He was not addressing the origins of ALL life. Just that a complex creature did not pop into existence like adam and eve are supposed to have.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "without breaking the laws of science" I have yet to meet a creationist that knows the 'laws of science'. What they claim is usually a corrupted simplified version of a Law (a term they don't comprehend either).
The Law of Biogenesis was to dispute (correctly) the absurd spontaneous generation theory that was supported by biblical canon. Pasteur destroyed the concept that a complex lifeform (mice or flies) appear spontaneously from nonliving matter. This is not abiogenesis.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "matter-heat-oxygen etc etc and yet we've never had an animal come out of peanut butter." This is one of the most stupid unscientific statements I have heard, I think I heard Banana man (Ray) use it once.
Talk to your biology teacher who actually comprehends evolution. You are still young, you can still learn basic science if you actually go to scientific professionals.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "Was the first creature that came from water use gills or lungs?" you make it sound as if its impossible for a fish to leave the water for any time. even today there are types of fish that leave the water, including lungfish.
"Did it run on the ground and then back into the water until it could grow legs?" It did not GROW legs. The fins became stronger over generations to support its weight on land. Animals do not morph at will.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "Im tired of this pointless debate" I only started to debate you.
Now to the Darwin quote. If its about the EYE evolving? Have you actually read his book?
This is a FAMOUS quotemine from creationists. Its totally dishonest. The quote is half of his argument, the 2nd half of the page it was taken from explains that although evolution seems counterintutitive, it did happen exactly as stated. Creationists take the first half of his argument and never mention the 2nd half.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath Nothing has contradicted evolution Theory. A fact might be altered or abandoned but the Theory is not challenged. I think you really need to look at other Theories, to compare. Creationism vs Evolution is as scientific as saying Angels are holding our feet to the ground vs The Theory of Gravity, because its JUST a Theory.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "1 theory 1 story 1 origins of man" First we do not know EVERYTHING, so various hypotheses are always put forward to offer options. These are discarded over time as the most successful hypothesis forms the basis of a new scientific Theory. Evolution had various versions in the 1800s, now there is only ONE. The individual facts vary as they get rechecked and new evidence appears. Science is flexible.
Creationism is not an alternative Theory to evolution.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "if its factual and true" Wow, a creationist seriously tries that argument about science? There are thousands of denominations in christianity, they agree on almost nothing (bar some kind of god and that a jesus existed). Does that mean that you agree its not factual or true?
You don't even comprehend scientific terms. You compare science with religion (which I just reversed for fun). Science is never a religion. Evolution is part of science.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "why do evolution scientist try to PROVE it and then fail?" I think you have been totally brainwashed by creationists. Evolution is proven, but all science is a work in progress and further research continues in ALL fields of science. There is no absolute claims in science. There is nothing that disproves evolution. Nothing. An individual hypothesis may be challenged and changed but the Theory of Evolution is now as certain as Germ or Cell Theory.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "if it were sceintific fact then the WHOLE sciene community would accept it and it would not be debated still" Evolution is not debated still. It is accepted by the scientific community, even many devout christians who lead these projects accept common decent, even without fossil records support. The DNA has all the evidence.
What is debated is the individual facts, which get tested and double checked, as they have for 150 years. But all Theories work that way.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath You are welcome to post your best evidence for creationism. What I see is the same old tired arguments. Your posts show you have a lack of basic understanding about evolution. Do you even realise that if tomorrow evolution was abandoned it would add nothing to creationism. creationism is not science, it is guesses and faith assumptions.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath wolves and dogs. We KNOW historically that dogs evolved from early wolves, estimated at 12,000 years ago when they first became domesticated.
Wolves indeed have a structured pack, more than many others, but other creatures, including dogs and cats have a pecking order, have rules, have an alpha, etc. Its just not as evolved as shown in the wolves. All pack hunters, like hyenas, have similar traits, just not as well developed. They evolved these traits.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath From your demonstration about the wildabeast you have just demonstrated you have no knowledge of what evolution actually is. Where DO you get this information?
From creationist sites? Any trait can be specific to a particular species, it does not mean it never came from any previous ancestor. You keep thinking that you can compare modern animals with each other. Evolution never said that current animals came from each other, but ancestors of BOTH creatures.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
You should read more books and you would figure these things yourself
MrSorsis 1 month ago
@isawrath I have looked at dozens of your posts, you seem to be a nexus of creationist myths and pseudo science.
I have seen multiple fallacies in your arguments, appeals to emotion, appeals to authority, arguments from ignorance, arguments on popular opinion, etc.
You are not intellectually educated enough to put your point across. You build strawmen to attack, or focus on the wrong issue.
PM me with your best argument for creationism and I will demonstrate your flaws.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "Theory IS a hypothesis" Evolution Theory means something completely different to the common term used by the public. All scientists and anyone remotely educated knows this. I learned this in school decades ago.
Theory = This is an umbrella term for explaining WHY something happens, and holds all the facts and hypothesis that are related to that question.
A hypothesis is a falsifiable explanation for HOW something works or happened. Evolution is ALSO a fact and a hypothesis.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "HE IS GOD! Of course you cant understand him no one can." yet so many books are written declaring his/her/its will, and so many creationists think they know his/her/its works, methods, desires and so forth. Creationists have failed repeatedly over and over again to prove anything about their god. There is no real evidence for a god, only what resides inside the fervent imaginations of religious people.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath "entirely apart of the human species or the ape species" you do understand how evolution actually works, don't you. Its a branching process. Of course there would be cousins to the homo sapien branch. This supports evolution. It would be far more suspicious if we found no cousins to man. They are linked closer to man than to ape. Their ancestors were the same as ours, but we did not branch directly from their group, much like the boisei are a cousin, further back in time..
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
@isawrath Google "List of human evolution fossils" to see just how many fossils exist that back up the concept that man evolved from common ancestors with other primates.
We are animals. We are mammals and finally we are primates.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "Darwin himself said it couldnt work." Provide the quote that proves he said that.
"they thought were the ancestors of man actually coexsisted with them at the same time"
Yes in the past when we only had neanderthal fossils the hypothesis was they were ancestors, rather than, as we know now, cousins of homo sapien. Science is not about absolutes, unlike religion. However this does not dispute evolution of man, it merely shows that it shared, rather than was, an ancestor.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
Comment removed
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@isawrath "all the findings and scientific research have revealed that the fossil record does not suggest an evolutionary process" Everything supports evolution. What you mean is that it does not support the creationists strawman view of evolution.
AMomentOfClarity2011 1 month ago
This is a satire right? It must be.
fiveohmustang 1 month ago
I want to high five this guy in the face with my physics and biology textbooks
scienceandhiphop2011 1 month ago
@isawrath Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Australopithecus africanus, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus,Homo floresiensis, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Denisovans, Homo neandethalensis, Homo sapiens(humans) are these all hoaxes?
dakerson1234 1 month ago
@isawrath The second law of thermodynamics applies to a closed system. The earth is not a closed system. Do you know what the sun is?
dakerson1234 1 month ago
@isawrath YOU are an APE! What is so fuckin hard to understand? You are a transitional species. We DO have transitional fossils but you choose to ignore them. You think that fossils just poof into existence and are everywhere? The reason you don't see more is because a fossil requires precise conditions to form. I really hope your from the south because I like to believe insane people like you only live down there.
dakerson1234 1 month ago
@isawrath No, they haven't been debunked. Evolution doesn't break any laws of science and no real scientist debate its validity. The only ones that deny the fact of evolution on right wing jesus freaks with an agenda. Don't you find it the least beat odd that the vast vast majority of highly educated scientists around the world except is as fact? Is it some massive conspiracy? Or are you arrogant enough to believe that you are more informed and better educated then them?
dakerson1234 1 month ago
@isawrath I'll capitalize things to seem important like you. THER IS AN OVERWHELMING AMOUNT OF EVIDENCE INCLUDING FOSSILS DNA AND EVEN OBSERVED EVOLUTION. GET SOMETHING ELSE TO PREACH ABOUT LIKE ABORTION BECAUSE YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T UNDERSTAND SCIENCE
dakerson1234 1 month ago
@isawrath It is indeed a fact and to deny displays astounding ignorance on your part. You want evidence? Try looking for it! Instead of clinging to pseudo scientists that regurgitate the same debunked crap over and ivermectin, go to a museum, read a book, educate yourself. You are being willfully ignorantl because ppl like u need the bible to be literal. If its not then to u god can't exist. Wake up
dakerson1234 1 month ago
@isawrath Last point: you just cant seem to get your head around these key words. nothing is ever going to be 'proven', as that indicates it can be predicted. evolution is not a belief system. change over time is a fact
jukejuk 1 month ago
@isawrath When reffering to these stories of Noah's ark and other what i would call myths, you should read up skeptic / debunked theories on it. If you are rational and understand science, it becomes clear most of the time which claims are true, and which are false. It was the story of Noah's ark remains that re-kindled my curiosity for religion because i had always wanted to beleive in the supernatural but could never rationalise it to myself. On my seach, i became an Atheist
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath And you think evolution between single cell organisms should happen at the same time as mutil cell organisms? Why whould this happen? You're concept is wrong
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath I'm not from the USA, i'm from the UK where Church and State to use those terms is not seperate. Even though they are not seperate, they still teach Evolution. The same goes for the rest of modern Europe because we've gained enough knowledge to know fact from fiction
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath I'm studying the Bible and the Torah just now strangely. If you take Genesis and Noah's arc literally then you are either uneducated or dillusional because they all defie logic and science and logic and science are what define reality. So if they are true, then they are not part of reality.
If you want to try and help me understand, compell me with evidence to support your claim that God exists without reffering to historical religious books.
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath And may the flying spahgetti monster bless your life. I'm wondering though. If you know Evolution is false better than anyone, why not go and educate the Pope about how his former didn't know anything about Genesis because he accepted evolution. Why not go and email / speak to Richard Dawkins and prove his facts wrong? Science looks at evidence and lets the evidence tell what happened. There is nothing religious about science.
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath The evidence is there all over the internet, science books. It's not my job to spoon feed you it, if you want answers you can study them yourself. Is there a theory that explains how the law of gravity works? Sure there is. It's a theory most people accept from science. The theory of evolution just explains how the factual mechanism of evolution works as best as we know using all the evidence. The pope even accepts evolution.
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath If Science always proves creationism then why are all the best Bioligists around the world who know about life better than you or me support Evolution? You are either 1) A troll. 2) A liar 3) Niave. You are spouting nonsense. If Science always proves creationism why is evolution taught in school. Please do some reaseach on that question, then answer it. Also check out 46 to 48 chromosomes evolutoin facts on google and answer me that as well please. Defend your faith
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath In case you haven't noticed, God or anything supernatural breaks the laws of science/
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath No no no no. Creationists say "it happened beleive me" without any hard evidence. All evidence which creationists have brought to the scientific community has been debunked. Evolution has been undergoing rigerous tests by science for the last 150 years and so far it's still not debunked. Evolution is a fact, the theory is how we explain how that fact happens.
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath Creationism provides more asnwers? Come on, you have to be joking. Why is evolution a fact in the scientific community then and creationism is an outdated philophosy? When you know the difference between a Hypothesis and a Theory then i'll know you're almost ready for an educated debate
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath yeah wouldnt it be mental if people thought we were invented by someone?!
jukejuk 1 month ago
@isawrath Do you know how fossils are created? You keep asking all these questions which have been answered decades ago. Please educate yourself. Do some reasearch on Evolution before you try and debate against it because you're not bringing any new questions to the table of the educated. All of this is answered in the very basics of evolution, fossil records, historical facts
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath A theory is not a hypothesis. A hypothesis is an idea or a suggestion about how something works. If you do some research on how a hypothesis becomes a theory and stays a theory you will understand more. All your points have been around since the 60's and in the 150 years since the theory of Evolution has been around it has not been de-bunked yet. Science and studying it provides answers. Religious creationism creates more questions than provide answers
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath Are you an idiot? Evolution is a fact just like gravity is a fact. The theory of evolution is merely the best explanation we have for something we know exists. It is not a religion it is a scientific fact. Are people who beleive in gravity or the theory that explains it following some sham religion? If you think evolution "just happens" or things "just make themself" then 1) you need to study more on evolution 2) what you said applys more to religion than science.
hardcoretam 1 month ago
Is this guy for REAL?
GenuineViking 1 month ago
@isawrath OK, think of it like this. Spanish and Italian languages both derived from Latin. Gradually, over a large amount of time 1 group of people started speaking Italian and another went off an spoke Spanish. There wasn't a Latin mother who gave birth to an Italian speaking child and a spanish speaking child, it the change in language happened very very gradually. You want some missing links, here's a few wikipedia(.)org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils#Human_evolution
jukejuk 1 month ago
@isawrath and Every time we find a missing link creationists go 'hey whats the missing link between those two?' do you want every single descendant from the common ancestor to be found for you to be believe evolution? and when you were talking about 'proof not evidence'.. you only get universal proofs through mathematics. All evidence is fact!
jukejuk 1 month ago
@isawrath im not saying that 4% doesnt make a difference im saying why do we have 96% the same? also we didnt evolve from 'monkeys' we evolved from a common ancestor between us and apes. Americans are generally immigrants came from europe a couple hundred years ago yeah? So why are there still europeans huh? its the same principle. there was a split. one group went to america, one stayed in europe. one went to apes, the other to early forms of man
jukejuk 1 month ago
@jukejuk You're wasting your time on his one my friend. The fact he is saying Evolution is a religion is blatent troll material.
"All you people that beleive in the theory of gravity that the earth is round are following a false religion"
fuckin lolz
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath and its just a coincidence that we share 96% of our dna with chimps? or do you not believe in dna
jukejuk 1 month ago
Then why are they so different from us ?
FUNGUS869 1 month ago
@isawrath no evolution? so noah was carrying every strain of human diseases on his arc? He had HIV, avian flu, hepatitis, gonorrhea, ciphilis etc? Also make your mind up whether you label it a theory or hypothesis. A theory is an explanation which is backed by "a considerable body of evidence," while a law is a set of regularities expressed in a "mathematical statement." A law explains what will happen under certain circumstances, while a theory explains how it happens.
jukejuk 1 month ago
Why do you assume when someone has a problem with evolution he must be a Christian?
FUNGUS869 1 month ago
Look at evoloution debunked the original series the strong points of evoloution are dissproved without question.
listenup345 1 month ago
@listenup345 If that is the case, then why was it when creationalists were against evolutionists in court about saying who teaches what at school, the evidence was so strong to support the evolution theory that the creationists walked out before it had finished?
Sure there are still questions gaps but the facts that make evolution have not been debunked. Otherwise it would no longer be a valid theory.
hardcoretam 1 month ago
fuck atheist pigs you guys are arrogant fucks,these are the kind of things you cant disprove or explain. SICK FUCKS!
listenup345 1 month ago
@listenup345 They have been explained for decades
hardcoretam 1 month ago
@isawrath there is nothing 'higher' than a theory in science.A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis or group of hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing.
jukejuk 1 month ago
im an atheist and i dont think im better than religeous people. how you can say such things and call yourself a christian is beyond belief. you dont even know how to follow the teachings of your own belief system. you are a fucking retard not a generalisation of christians, just you. dont be so hatefull you're no more a christian than me. practice what you preach dickhead
pixiesmasher 1 month ago
This video is the definition of irony but it entertained me. You try and "debunk" facts that have been proven and can be demonstrated. You call Atheists stupid bastards, but in making this video you have demonstrated you are very poorly educated on the things you are trying to discuss. I feel sorry for you and anyone else gullable enough to be a theist when they have access to real, logical, rational answers.
hardcoretam 1 month ago
This bullshit you reffer to is called science. You know, the same type of science that helped design those glasses you're wearing and was used to create that PC and camera you're using to record. You can answer these questions on your own if you can be bothered to look for the answers. I was religious once and i had questions similar to you. When i looked and examined the scientific and religious answers, the evidence and facts were easily in the sciences favour. I'm now an Atheist
hardcoretam 1 month ago
You are such a fucking idiot.
matthewbgod 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EVOLUTION HAS BEEN PROVED A FRAUD IN NEW SCIENCE MAGAZINE.. ERNST HAECKEL'S IMAGES ARE FAKE. HERE: ‘This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud. It’s shocking to find that somebody one thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading. It makes me angry … What he [Haeckel] did was to take a human embryo and copy it, pretending that the salamander and the pig and all the others looked the same at the same stage of development. They don’t … These are fakes.’
1xThreeDaysGrace1x 2 months ago
Now if we always listened to everything our ancestors said and relied entirely on faith that they were correct. We would have no science, we would be hunter gatherers. You don't need to be a scientist but if no one was you wouldn't have any of the technology to publish your views. I don't hate religious people but I do feel sad when I see people who are forced (often by their families) into a religion they did not choose. I see choice to believe in what you want is key.
k9pker 2 months ago
Question 2: We subscribe to the darwinian view that only genetic characteristics are passed on. If a creature "learns" to do something that will NOT be reflected in their offspring.
Question 3: Complex weather systems can be fully described by simple relationships but because the starting conditions are very difficult to measure accurately and the system is chaotic, a small change in initial conditions makes a large change in the outcome, it is very difficult to predict.
k9pker 2 months ago
@k9pker Wheres question 1? LOOL +LIKE+
1xThreeDaysGrace1x 2 months ago
@1xThreeDaysGrace1x Soz q1 was in my 1st post.
k9pker 2 months ago
500 characters to explain why planets are round: challenge accepted.
Firstly spacetime exploded rather than any physical thing.
Gravity affects every particle in the universe. It draws them together within planets and stars. The particles within a non uniform shape pull the particles that are furthest from the centre of mass most strongly and the ones at the centre of mass don't move. To form a stable structure where this is the case, it creates a sphere.
k9pker 2 months ago
FFS does he have half a clue what he is on about. And as for saying we call religious people awful names. Iwill happily adimit to calling arsehole creationists prats, but i dont have anything against religious people in general. As long as they are not trying to force their beleifs on me.
moggy041279 2 months ago
It doesn't have ANYTHING to do with wind, or motion, since there is nothing in space that could make that.
I would guess that it was gravitation, and the earth isn't completly round.
Now, why would a deer learn not to run infront of a car, when you die, you don't learn anything.
My parents where'nt christians, or jews, they are non-believers, atheists. Dude, why are religous people better than atheists, when you try to convert us all the time, disturbing our peace, and why are you making war?
Memberotto 2 months ago
@Memberotto
You're the one who clicked on the video, dude. I agree with you, but responding to negativity is just as bad as causing it. I know you guys need to stand up for yourselves and I'm ashamed at the ignorance of my fellow theists, but at the same time you can't let this type of foolishness get to you.
Elementer117 2 months ago
@Elementer117 Well, I'm not rude and saying "Christians make me sick" as this guy did: "Atheists make me sick".
Memberotto 2 months ago
@Memberotto
And I applaud you for being civil and respectful of other people's beliefs. I'm just saying don't let assholes like the one in this video get to you.
Elementer117 2 months ago
@Elementer117 Thank you for that, and I'm usually not getting upset by theists trying to convert me, I usually just ignore them, until they call me stupid, "you make me sick" or other words.
Memberotto 2 months ago
All this guys manages to do is show his complete ignorance on any of the scientific fields he tries to refute.
Not knowing something isn't an excuse to say goddidit. That's a cop-out, not answer nor an explanation.
thomaseshuis 2 months ago
Why should atheist have to answer these questions?
They are completely unrelated to atheism.
Please educate yourself on what atheism actually is.
Question1: Because the big bang theory does not explain the creation of planets, but of the universe. This guys know nothing about the BB theory nor cosmology in general.
"Other things about evolution" The BB theory isn't evolution.
thomaseshuis 2 months ago
this is a poe, right?
TheLittleDonkey 2 months ago
He called me a stupid bastard.........CONTRADiCTION
imation879 2 months ago in playlist More videos from EarthisYoung
The answer is simple! GRAVITY. Planets and stars are round because of gravity!
SoulShepherd84 2 months ago
what a retard!!! if there was a god it would kill this fat fuck!!
FUwogs 2 months ago
*facepalm*
OptimalElement 2 months ago
LOL this is hilarious. Please, for the love of Pete, don't ever breed.
meadoz1975 2 months ago
lol
mistarcraw 2 months ago
Planets are round because of gravity, as I hoped everybody learned at school. This guy is a moron. Animals do evolve to anthropomorphic changes, look at islands where animals did not encounter humans, they are not scared of them because they have not evolved to be, everywhere else they run away at the merest sight of a human. Everything you ask has such simple answers, but creationists don't care, they like what they believe and they are not interested in the truth.
pezzamange 2 months ago
Such an uneducated rant.......hilarious.
AceofDlamonds 2 months ago
Big Bang was debunked 2005 by Redshift... Not official yet tho....
InternetGuy1975 2 months ago
@InternetGuy1975 whatever you are claiming, until it is published in a peer-reviewed journal, you can't cite it as if it's proven. That's the way it works in science. You don't claim something has debunked another until it has been accepted into the journal.
Casshyr 2 months ago
@Casshyr I was not claiming it as official. Is big bang just a theory?
InternetGuy1975 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@InternetGuy1975 "I was not claiming it as official" => you certainly sounded like it. If you are not, then you should end such claim with the phrase "that's my opinion". And also, if you claim big bang theory is just a theory, then it sounds like you don't quite understand what a scientific theory is, and how it differs from the everyday usage of the word "theory". There's a difference. A scientific theory doesn't become a fact, or a law. It is already as high as it can ever go.
Casshyr 2 months ago
@InternetGuy1975
how?
OptimalElement 2 months ago
@OptimalElement google big bang theory debunked
InternetGuy1975 2 months ago
@InternetGuy1975
I just did there now. Was expecting to find a scientific paper. But no, just a bunch of rabble written by creationists who don't know first thing about science and no doubt in their attempt to debunk something get their science all wrong and so express their ignorance on the topic.
OptimalElement 2 months ago
What an idiot. Obviously uneducated. Smartass me in person like this, boy, and I'll slap your ugly fat potato head into next week. That will help you to evolve some common sense, perhaps, or at least some manners, boy. Now shut your uneducated mouth, you rude pig.
BarrosSerrano 2 months ago
Atheism is not synonymous with nihilism. I wish people would stop mixing these two up.
MB4493 2 months ago
Comment removed
MB4493 2 months ago
Comment removed
magicxninjax 2 months ago
I literally cannot think of any words to describe how incredibly stupid this guy is...
"OH YOU HAVE NO IDEA"
No... uh... we do. We know exactly how these things work.
It is you, good sir, that has no idea. You're too stupid to realize it.
pupmommydad 2 months ago
Go listen to adam carolla he is a genius
Beedizzle96 2 months ago
We have completely FUCKED ourselves as a society
Beedizzle96 2 months ago
Words can not explain how anyone can be this stupid. For one thing, the Big Bang wasn't an exploding rock. It was an explosion of space and matter. and secondly there are people called meteorologists who's job it is, is to predict when and where cyclones and the such for and how they for. so really just WTF
hawkins1905 3 months ago
it sickens me to think that in the last ten minutes I have found so many unspeakably stupid people. "those with a golf ball sized intelligence will have a golf ball sized knowledge" welcome to America
jesustouchedmykids 3 months ago
Round planets? Really? We really do know why. Too easy.. watch?v=Xxn3WEGFaxE&
Check out my Potholer54 playlist. He does a great job of explaining
Deer and fish. Evolution takes millions of years. Cars have been around for only a hundred. The physiology of deer and how much they can perceive at night plays into it. Fish are dumb. That's why you see them on dumb peoples cars.
BTW, Dr. Hovind, isn't a doctor. He's a liar soaking morons for their money. Well, not so much now he's in jail.
xdassinx 3 months ago
The other questions aren't worth answering, look it up. The answers are very easy to find.
Tris67 3 months ago
He doesn't bring up any valid points. To answer his first question: why are planets round? ANSWER: Planets are round because their gravitational field acts as though it originates from the center of the body and pulls everything toward it. With its large body and internal heating from radioactive elements, a planet behaves like a fluid, and over long periods of time succumbs to the gravitational pull from its center of gravity.
Tris67 3 months ago
@Tris67 The only way to get all the mass as close to planet's center of gravity as possible is to form a sphere. The technical name for this process is "isostatic adjustment."
Tris67 3 months ago
@Tris67 With much smaller bodies, such as the 20-kilometer asteroids we have seen in recent spacecraft images, the gravitational pull is too weak to overcome the asteroid's mechanical strength. As a result, these bodies do not form spheres. Rather they maintain irregular, fragmentary shapes.
Tris67 3 months ago
[Zariyat 51:47] And We have built the heaven with Hands (the Divine Power), and it is We Who give the expanse.
{Anbiya 21:30} Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were joined together as one united piece, then We parted them? And We have made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?
--
here are the 2 Quran verses where God clearly stipulates Big Bang.
Gregrutz,
google "big bang model"; yes it all started from 1 single point.
giresunstronghold 3 months ago
Evolution doesn't say that when fish swim around a sharks eyes it grows a hammer head, it is the result of mutation, think of a carpet shark, it is relatively flat, one could easily see the transition between them and modern hammer heads.
A twister is a result of updrafts, these spin and gain momentum until they become very large...please do research before going onto camera and acting like an idiot.
People make fun of YOU on YouTube because you ARE stupid not because your beliefs