Added: 4 years ago
From: trailriderresearch
Views: 7,326
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • BIGGEST BULLSHIT I'VE EVER SEEN

  • @camindfreakIDOL How do you know it's bullshit, MR. Expert?

  • what is the proof maybe somone cut their hair and put on there

  • This sample should be compared with the DNA samples taken at Snelgrove Lake Ontario. youtube.com/watch?v=9BLKEW5OC_­U&feature=related

  • Looking forward to hearing more news of this.

  • @komodoman so am I - Its time to give the good doctor a call

  • Preliminary word from Dr Alley ... probable BF hair. I will post up a video of the final report when I receive it.

  • the hair could be deer and the foot print is way to small even for a small sasquatch

  • its been 2 years now. have you heard anything about the samples?

  • I gave some of them to Dr. Bindernagel - Looks like he's dropped the ball. Problem is there is nothing to match them to. DNA is an after the fact test.

  • The remaining hairs are now in the Possession of Dr. J Robert Alley in Alaska. I received word today they will then be forwarded to David Paluides for further forensic Analysis.

  • Very nice stuff! If you haven't had the hair analyzed, drop me a line quickly. I just sent some samples off and have the addresses available for you. Also, watch my vid regarding hair collection.

  • can't they clone one from that? lol

  • Rrrrrrright. Duh- if this was real, you would do a DNA test and would be the lead story on every news program in the World. God, never underestimate the stupidity of the public!

  • dna results will prove nothing at this point. all bf dna are classed as unknown origin. a coollective science body must create a library of suspected bf dna from all samples in north america to make dna evidence of any value. Bindernagle agreed on this with me on this point just the other day in phone conversatations.

    until then, dna is inconclusive as evidence

  • I agree with your rationale. What will be needed is a large database of the same DNA. That would be indisputable evidence the problem with Sasquatch hair samples is that they have no medulla hence no DNA to extract. I believe that DNA is the best way to prove their existence without imposing on their freedom. This will take time. Email me about this subject. I have some good information about his subject.

  • DNA is after the fact. A body would have to come first. And as I have been told recently there already has been bodies collected, and disposed of.  It's one brick wall after another in this game.

  • your simply not informed my friend the creature is real!!!DNA proves nothing at all other than there IS A LARGE UNCLASSIFIED CREATURE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST.

  • Fascinating...

  • whoa

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more