Added: 4 years ago
From: Mig29tvc
Views: 3,002,415
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9,652)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Я был на миге, там бардак, и в реале не могут они даже Миг-29К сделать, не то что миг-35.

    Миги никто в мире не закупает, только Су-27/30. Устарел давным давно.

  • So what's the difference between this and a Mig-29. Essentially they look the same on the outside. If it's an updated, more modern aversion of it why not just call it a Mig-29D, or F, or whatever version of it they are on. By calling it a 35 it sounds like they came up with a totally new aircraft.

  • @majalca03 Because they need to sell it, did you see the new bottle of coca cola? also they russian forces may call it for the real designation, a good example is the Su35 wich is the Su27M for the russian air force

  • @Foxtrop13 Does it matter, it just proved that a spitfire with a good pilot could own a f16 in battle, sure they were probably scaled down to some level of equallity on both planes but the fact remains that this man won with a Spitfire, using superior skill and intuition.

    Just like in the 2 -day China vs soviet Russia war, china invaded with 2 million troops and the russians defended with 200.000 and after 2 days china surrendered and went back.

  • @Foxtrop13 Bringing home a number of 200.000 deaths on the side of China vs 2000 -4000 deaths on the russian side. why did the Russians won when outnumbered by 10x? Because they knew the envoirment better, they had better tactics and a much better outplanned attack plan than the Chinese who simply went on an all out attack on the Siberian border.

  • @Foxtrop13 Essentailly brain always wins over sheer force. And we have seen this over and over in threwout history in the walk of time. Still battles are won not on who has the best technology but who has the best tactic in direction of both envoirment aswell as tech.

    After all a good pilot must not only rely on computers to help him fly in and out teritory safely, he must be able to make good decisions and make manouvres on his own, in times when computers fail to..

  • @Foxtrop13 And they will fail(the computers) eventually for there are far far from perfect. Regardsless of where they come from or threw whom they are made by.

    A good day to you Sir

  • @slayer2961 Engines are not computers to escape from a spitfire they could easly accelerate or turn faster and in small angle than the spitfire, that fight must be probably propaganda i mean it depends of the rules of engament, like dogfights between f16 and f22 where the f16 pilots won for two reasons, more experience in the f16 and cause the f22 must engage in visual contact cause that is the idea wich is odd for an stealth air superiority fighter

  • @Foxtrop13 Well thats what Im trying to say. It depends on the pilot, obviously in a battle with a experience pilot in a average plane or a beginner in a advanced plane the experienced pilot would probably win regardsless or the less advanced plane.

  • @Foxtrop13 Having the best tech isnt everything in battle...

  • что усрались?? руский балалайка))

  • Best world pilot!Vityaz!!!!

    

  • BEST!!!!!

  • defeat??. I can see you are into planes a lot. There is no such thing as defeat unless there is a real war. Russians are starving to maintain their old weaponry.If the real thing ever comes they will br struggling for new parts in the basement which they will not find.

  • @11MRKARL nope theese planes are rather cheap compared to the f22 and f35 if nothing when there is a war parts for all of theese planes would come rolling of the line like warm bread in a bakery. Reason why there not doing it now, is simply because its not needed....

    Unlike the US they dont feel a need to have 4000 planes, they make good AA insted ;)

  • @11MRKARL its not so much the plane that counts its more or less the pilot. ever heard of the sotry of the 2 US pilots, one had only been a militairy pilot for 2 years the other a veteran with about 16 years of experience? well they went head to head, the 2 years in a F16 and the veteran in a WWII Spitfire. Guess who won? The veteran.. Pull your own conclusions :).

    And have a nice day!

  • @slayer2961 conclusion the F16 didnt use their AIM120, but really? I mean an f16 can easly go 1200km/h make turns of 9G and got radars, is hard to belive i mean if you say me an F86 or a Skyhawk but an Spitfire no way that can won against 2 F16

  • built for pure offence

  • One good Russian pilot who does not drink Vodka out of 100? Whereas in the US all pilots are the best airmen.

  • @11MRKARL

    US pilots have long been overrated. There was only 5 US aces in Vietnam compared to 16 Vietnamese. Since then the US has pretty much fought no one with any air force of note. Are you aware that in 1992 some Su-27s visited an airbase in Virginia and flew off against F-15s - the Russians defeated the Americans whether they were attacking or defending.

  • America never had better wepaons than Russia,they always had junk planes and tanks and everything.... but its uselles to argue with brainless people there are many videos that proves that Russia has better planes just search a little!! Pozdrav braco Rusi!!! :)))

  • Russian junk.

  • wonderfullll human and machine

  • Nice try Oleg....you too Yuri.

  • are the russians just now getting around to copying the F-14? Looks almost identical...haha

  • @jgmetals81 copying the F-14? LOL

  • @AV58 yes...thats right

  • @jgmetals81 you are either blind or retarded. Judging by your comments on here I am going to go for retarded. Look up F14 and then watch this video again. if you have half a brain cell remaining you will see the difference.

  • 座舱盖动作好生硬啊

  • перед фонарем торчит маленький р2д2)))

  • F 16 ?

  • beautifull

  • She is like russian girls, beutifull and elegant

  • @wowa1strelok dont you mean emaciated and pale??

  • yeah beatiful looking ..i like the russian air plane fighter

  • magnificent.....fuck them all.

  • It's just a souped-up MIG-29...not much to see here compared to an F-22, Rafale or Eurofighter :(

  • FUCKING WEAK ASS CHEAP MOTHERFUCKING RUSSIAN PLANES WITH WEAK FIREPOWER. SOVIET UNION WAS STRONG BUT RUSSIA TODAY ISN'T EVEN A QUARTER AS STRONG AS IT WAS, FUCK RUSSIA, RUSSIA IS A JOKE

  • @MrEdmond1 Stfu

  • @MrEdmond1 you're right...except that they made SHIT during the soviet era as well....just more of it.

  • It's Worse than US plane :D

  • @maglodify what the fucking you are ...you riding the bicycle and talking about the air plane fighter ..lol you are iron man

  • fly baby fly

  • if a country's woman are like there planes than Russian woman are good looking, agile, fun ride and american a waste of money, over hyped, high maintainence, that will eventually be sold to highest bidding Arab

  • @eggnogs LEARN HOW TO SPEAK ENGLISH BEFORE YOU TRY AND TYPE IT ASSHOLE!!!!!!

  • @jgmetals81 Let me guess, you are a fat fuck who even the fatties in your own country wont fuck. Oh and on your keyboard look for a cap lock button and turn that shit off, typing in all capitals just adds to your stupidity.

  • Comment removed

  • Russian Air Superiority!!!! Greetings from Serbia!!!! :)))

  • @Dzonsi999 UHAUHAHUA SERBS SUCK RUSSIAN DICK AND EVEN GET A RUSSIAN BONER IN THEIR ASS FOR WEAPONS :D

  • @MrEdmond1 fuck of stupid Albanian idiot go suck American dick!!

  • @Dzonsi999 SUCK MY ALBANIAN DICK U PUSSY ASS RUSSIAN PUSSY ASS MOTHERFUCKER. I'LL KILL U MOTHERFUCKER U AND SERBITCHES. SERBS SUCK UR DICK FOR WEAPONS MOTHERFUCKING RUSSPUSSY

  • @MrEdmond1 while u r sucking via the net, net hero, we r killing u!

    пока ты пиздишь, нет герой, мы вас пиздим!

  • Russians dont fuck around

  • @pe6obutilkata oh they dont fuck around....is that why they have just now gotten around to copying the F-14....FORTY TWO YEARS LATER!?!?!?!? Its almost identical. What a joke.

  • @jgmetals81 What a ridiculous comment. Please do elucidate (that means, 'EXPLAIN.') how the Mig 35 looks remotely like an F-14 Tomcat? Where is the variable geometry swing wing for starters? You evidently know little about military aviation, the Russians design and build some very potent aircraft. Only a buffoon would write the Mig 35 off as a copy of the F-14. Your comment has ZERO credibility. Are you American per chance? ROFL

  • SU-35 and MiG-35 are shittiest aircraft ive ever seen the F-22 and F-35 will shoot them down before the crappy russian fighters detect them with useless radars the russians are bunch shit talkers thinking there aircraft are way better than ours will they are mistaken if they really want to prove there aricraft are superior than ours they declare war on us instead of saying shyt on stupid video that means nothing!!

  • @livedarkness1 Info : A F-22 costs 3 times more than an upgraded Su-35 and almost five times more than its chinese counterpart . Hitler had better tanks and planes in WW2 but they were beaten anyway cause Russia had 3 times more tanks .

    Just imagine a fight between one sniper and five "crappy" archers . Are you sure the sniper would win ?

  • @KRaikkonenSF no offense but your really not making sense right now

  • @livedarkness1 Quantity is as important as quality . You've got (I suppose you're American, correct me if I'm wrong) 187 F-22, but how many planes do Russia and China have ?

    US fighters are good but they're simply too expensive . Their Russian counterparts are cheaper ; which means they have the advantage of quantity .

    The allmighty USAF would probably win but not so easily...

    BTW how do you know Russian planes are "crappy" ?

  • @livedarkness1

    haha nice joke, even su-33 can take your shits down any time any place.

  • @livedarkness1 no one is shit talking but you, and F-22 and F-35 are 5th gen planes, Mig-35 and SU-35 are 4.5 gen planes. bad comparison. and declare war? are you stupid? go back to playing video games because this is real life

  • Кто-нибудь переведите этому мелкому гомосеку пускай перестает дрочить на покемонов

  • LOL You fails are bashing the usa. I bet russia would dare to even try to start a damn war. bahahhahahah FUCK RUSSIA.

  • @jay6541 Fuck your mom in ass stupid little schoolboy

  • @jay6541 fuck you and usa

  • @Roofius2 I bet me and usa would kick yall asses.

  • @jay6541 Fucking pokemonlover

  • @IamRussianSoldier Lol Thanks for viewing my channel please come again stupid russian mut.

  • @jay6541 go do a home-work little girl

  • @IamRussianSoldier LOL Nice comeback you russian mut. make your self useful and sdfu. bahahahahhahah russia sucks.

  • u idiot people think that Mig-35D is the best plane?? watch this:

    /watch?v=XQyf2jeElyg

  • @XXarsha F-35 ugliest airplane ever

  • @XXarsha Firstl: you do know nothing about planes, F35 was copied from Як-141!

    Secondly: whach this! /watch?v=VQuFzHX-tco&feature=r­elated from 3-10

    or this! watch?v=Ai7eaDeRlDs Russian planes have Type Klimow RD-33OVT engine with three dimension thrust-vectoring engine. F 22 have 2 D. thrust-vectoring engine. So go and play your Battlefield

  • I wish that Croatian army buys this plane instead of Gripen I always prefer Migs they are better and they last longer

  • fuck the usa movies always winning russia GREECE <3 RUSSIA

  • I don't know and couldn't care less if it's better/less than any other fighter plane. It's got a sweet design. Looks sharp. The video game geek in me is wondering if it'll be available on the next Ace Combat game.

  • Looks like a Updated out of date attempt to make a Russian version of the F-14 Tomcat. Looks cool but nothing is or will ever be as Perfect as planned. And why All of the U.S. bashing? Russian jets have always lagged behind their American Counterparts have that been forgotten? Just to point out a Fact you chose not to point out angelx..

  • @othur

    If US planes are better,when has any US plane(flown by USAF pilot) encountered same generation Russian plane(flown by RuAf pilot)?Mig-35 isn't F-14 but upgraded version of Mig-29Smt or equivalent of Mig-29OVT(test model).Su-27 is almost 30 years old and yet not even one US plane ever encountered it.So where are your facts?If US planes are so good why have they bought off cut up Mig-29's from Poland or Hungary and Su-27's from Ukraine in 90's.It's you who are at the wrong place.

  • I don't know if it's better or worse than a US plane, but it is beautiful looking.

  • @rodmunch1973 Who can tell if its better or worse! Ever few years the soviets come out with another mig and they say the same thing; its superior to american fighters, usually compared favorably to the F-15. Every few years the same thing. If its so superior than why do they need a new plane every few years.

  • @rodmunch1973 just to lets u know, Migs arent as good as this vid points them out to be,there actually a peice of shit

  • @rodmunch1973 You will be able to establish whether its better or not in the very near future, when they go screaming through the sky's above your home; once Russia & China decide enough is enough and team up against the US.

    Actually that will probably co-inside with a US civil war, with an uprising to overthrow the 1% and corrupt government that cause death, famine & heartache throughout the world, unless of course RON PAUL gets voted in first and fixes things. ربنا معاك LOL

  • @ecotts HA! Thats hilarious! Russia and China have a total of 2 aircraft carriers COMBINED! And the Mig 35D- oh, less than half a dozen built! US F22s- 200. Screaming over the US! HAHAHA! China and Russia teaming up together! Its so stupid! The Russian people are NOT going to vote Putin back into the Russian Presidency, because they are smart enough to see how corrupt HE is! And you are too stupid to realize on which side the "bread is buttered!" Dream on! Civil war! LMAO! CORRUPT! PFFT!!!

  • mig-35

    su-35bm

    mig-31bm

    su-25sm

    su-25sm

    pak-fa in 2015 

  • @TATARSTAN59500

    And much more.

    US in 2015,few pilots killed in F-22's,few more F-22's lost(fallen God knows where),bad weather hampers the search,lol,F-35 variants still being tested while other obsolete junk like F-16,F-18,F-15 sold for oil or int. debt.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog yes i know but whan pak-fa is coming f-22 have 20 years old

    and j-20 30 years old

  • @TATARSTAN59500

    Rusting from the inside :-)

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog no only inside compare only aim-9 and r-73

    russia dominate

  • @TATARSTAN59500

    I know,lol.I was saying that for F-22,rusting from the inside.Future S-600 will be based on sea and air floating bases,how about that?R-73 had 3 upgrades and newest one has X on it.It's white with blue stripes.Tested by Mig-35 and Su-35.Similar missile is made for Ka-52.I know about it(engines are better,maneuverability,speed,r­ange,hit/miss area rate,levels of guidance,can't be jammed by ECM's,can be locked and fired at all angles of attack,guided by visor HUD).

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog but yankee dreaming in f-22

    the best the best ??? never us use pak-fa its provit its fail

    america is so jaleous of pak-fa and j-20

    look comment in j-20 video yankee talk"made in china" lol when in coming probably yankee talk other

  • @TATARSTAN59500

    They own China 700 Billion $ in loans,lol.When China comes for the money,they'll buy off the USAF altogether :-)

    Same was said for F-117A,best,can't be seen but in Serbia it was tracked down constantly,mocked by mobile frequencies,3 were destroyed by AA.One fell in Serbia,other in bosnia,third badly damaged landed in croatian zagreb airport,lol.Contracts with UK and Australia were cancelled but still we have "stealth" fairytale story told in F-22 and late F-35.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog f-35 probably is better but he go only in 1.800km/h

    so in 2015 when pak-fa is coming in navy euuu f-35 for what ?

  • @TATARSTAN59500

    Su-33M and Mig-29K are already better.No need for naval Pak-Fa.F-35 isn't better.It has more faults,costs much more and seems to be already outdated.It's 10 years too late and they are trying to bridge the gap with F-18 Super Hornet.I don't know,if Iran could capture that UAV,overtake controls and land it that I really doubt in anything they produce against decent adversary.I really do.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog lol hows fantasy island?lol :-) do you see "the plane boss." lol dur lol

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog China will not PISS OFF their BIGGEST customer for manufactured goods (dont bite the hand that feeds you...)! It is in their own best interest that everyone "gets along". F117s were retired years ago. Lets see, the number of US "stealth aircraft, or any US types compared to Russian built fighters shot down is, EMBARASSING for Mother Russia! Its easy for pro Russian miltary hardware fans to mock the US when Russians hide behind loses of Russian weapons used by inept surrogates...

  • @TATARSTAN59500 Lol you know your an liar when you said we were "jaleous" the pak fa and j-20...cause if that was true wouldnt we be making an new stealth jet? So stop your shit bro. and talk what you know.

  • weird drunken russian pilots. . .lol. .

  • Klasse Video!

  • LOL russian F-18

    

  • Only one plane can be the best.

    simple fact is the eurofighter out performs the f22 and any russian plane.

  • @mrfastreaction And? That's a hollow statement. Really there is no "best" fighter. The Typhoon, Raptor, Flanker, etc, all possess super-maneuverability, advanced avionics, radar, computers, etc. The differences between them are negligible at best. While each plane may have or lack some features that the others do not, the simple fact is that in the end, it really comes down to pilot training & experience. In addition, strategy, tactics & deployment play a big role too.

  • @gjc82071

    good responce and your right

  • @mrfastreaction Thanks.  :-)

  • Would someone give him a hand to shake already jeezzzz rofl!

  • miliu si lektuveli labai labai

  • HAIL TAVARISHE!

  • No doubt, the russian fighter jets are just like the russian woman. Simply beautiful!!!! Way much better looking, than any american crap.

  • @Metallion69 yeh but the american jets always look more high tec.. jus saying

  • @Metallion69 you sir are a fail. ;]

  • Who came here after playing Battlefield 3?

  • U guys forgot about the most important and main reason why the f-22 project is a failure... this plane has been considered the first in the Teen-series the most immature plane ever existed... Very difficult to fly/maneuver and dangerous!!... Although every maneuver has broken every record and the laws of physics!!... ej; Highest performance takeoff 9Vertical) ever recorded though very difficult to not go into stall!!!

  • PUGACHEV! Damn!

    

  • 0:48 the helicopter in the back with the soldiers dangling from it lol

  • @BuilderPete13 аххаах)

    Да, это забавно выглядело)

  • WoW WoW WoW WoW WoW WoW WoW WoW

    But I hate Putine,

  • on april 18 1970 israeli shut down 3 russian pilots over eygpt in mig 21 by the way mig was better then Mirage III

  • @sargon08

    Lies!

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog : thats from the egyptian comander sad al dean al shathly on AL JAZEERA T.V !!

  • @sargon08 maybe they're not russian pilots but some unexperienced middle eastern pilots?

  • @UseUrHead503 : No at the time egypt had no pilots they lost most of them in 1967 war so the soviet union sent 100 pilots to help egypt I am not sure if they were Russians but they were soviets for sure !!

  • @sargon08 it's just uneducated Arab pigs, not Russians.

  • RUSSIAN MILITARY PLANES ARE THE BEST IN THE WORLD

  • @mmilosbeograd

    HAHAHAHA!!!!

    ..........no. Not really.

    Have you faggots ever heard of an F-22. America is currently the ONLY nation to have fifth generation fighter planes in 100% stock and fully capable.

    This MIG-35 is fouth generation bullshit.

    And in 2016 the U.S will show off her Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II.

    So the moral of the story is to know your shit before you begin to jack off to Russia's shit military.

  • @AngelXOsaze What about Sukhoi T-50 PAK FA, asshole !!!

  • @mmilosbeograd

    HA!!

    Expert military engineers from all the world have agreed to the fact that the Sukhoi is nothing but a cardboard cut out of what the F-22 is. Same model, but with dramatically less efficiency, due to the fact the Sukhoi is only the third of the cost of the F-22.

    Let me remind you that Russia can't even affored to OWN a fifth-generation fighter plane until 2016. Those Sukhoi videos and pictures you've been jaking off to are only prototypes my friend.

  • @AngelXOsaze and America can afford it while everybody else is losing thier home.

  • Comment removed

  • @AngelXOsaze wat about t 50 dumbshit

    

  • @AngelXOsaze

    F-22 has been grounded due to faults.It killed 3 test and 2 other pilots(known).It's plane that got lost in Alaska(escorted by 2 F-18's)and wasn't found in 5 days!It's a plane unproven in any combat mission against any plane.It's overhyped piece of metal that will be considered obsolete once if it ever engages in combat.It's a plane that bankrupted USAF.As for F-35 is even worse stuff up.It's 10 years too late.Already too expensive and what to say about faults?Numerous

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog

    Please allow me to take a moment to lol at this

    lol

    lol

    lol

  • @jtasgl88

    Truth hurts,I know.It's sad,not funny :-(

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog It's overpriced and has it's faults but you can't go wrong with it. In test against F15's and F16's it won as much as 2 vs 12 and after training it ended up being 241 F15s and F16s killed and 2 F22 lost. It haven't seen any action yet but neither any next generation Sukhoi's or MiG's.

  • @TomuxLT Every new military weapon has its teething problems. Prior to Desert Storm, the US press were convinced that our Apache helicopters wouldnt be able to fly because of technical problems, M-1 Abrams would grind to a hault in the desert sand and we'd suffer as many as 100,000 casulties. They were wrong on every count! These BS artists who claim Russian military superiority have a serious commie hard-on up their asses! Russians would NEVER cross us because they know its a loser for them!

  • @THEORIGINALEXSCAPER Yeah I agree with you, USA is superior in pretty much every way. USA has more helicopters, more planes, more ships, even by infantry. Russia is only even to USA in tank category. Russians have more tanks but in my opinion T-72's even modernized ones are no match to M1's.

  • @TomuxLT And dont forget either, Russia has a conscripted (drafted) military, with a HUGE problem of drunkeness and history of AWOL personnel (I'd go AWOL to if I had to serve in their military). The US military is ALL volunteer and professional. Russias army has around 300,000. The US over 500,000 with over 500,000 in reserve/nat guard with combat experience. You have to have the soldiers, sailors and airmen behind the weapons in order to use them.

  • @THEORIGINALEXSCAPER

    Wrong. Russia's ground forces are close to 400K with less than half as conscripts. All males in the country have had some military training. This means about 20 million reserves of suitable military age. The same cannot be said for the US. The US has also used conscription previously and in recent times, the behaviour of the Army and Marines shows a distinct lack of professionalism and discipline.

  • @Internetbutthurt The US military hasnt had the draft (conscription) since the 1970's. Everyone in the US military volunteers. Period. Your sources of unprofessionalism involving Marines or US Army personnel (which, assuming are claims in Iraq, have been proven wrong) are no doubt from RT (Russia Today), youll forgive me, IS totally biased against anything American. If youre American, shame on you. If not, you really need to seek other news sources! 20 million Russian reserves is a fantasy.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog buudy F22s are expensive but they are really good jets and great example for good engineering..

  • @Nooffenceforall

    My" buddy" they are expensive because workforce is.Because parts are made ion over 100 other companies,some even overseas.Than they are shipped,tested,assembled.All that takes a lot of finances but that plane is never gonna be used in combat,ever!It's already assigned for US coast patrol duties,why?Because they (USAF) don't want to lose it as they did 3 F-117A's over Serbia(and against what)or that spy drone over Iran(hacked it was),lol.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog Are you a GOD who noes everything about future i mean how can u say they cant be used they made to use and they are not to use in iran or serdia f18's and f15's are enough for them. Those are to use in big wars like in case of war with china or russia

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog true..

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog It's true but don't forget that F22/35 shit jets are only a cover up for more advanced non-human jets like i.ex. X-45/47...

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog

    what is stealth tech in mass produced fighter called?

    waste of money, the american way

  • @vzq93

    If it even has "S" of Stealth in it???That's biggest question.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog you are stupid

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog Where in the FUCK are you getting this information from besides your ass? If you are going to bash the F-22 at least get your facts right you Serbian fuck.

    1. The F-22A Raptor has lost two planes killing two pilots. Alaska (2010) California (2008)

    2. We have NO F-18s in Alaska. (F-18 is a Navy plane)

    3. F-22s everywhere are flying except in two bases (Oxygen System).

    4. Not everything you hear on the news or youtube means its true. Idiot.

  • @UnkownSoldier117

    Few F-22's were lost on runways when canopy didn't open.I have been following F-22 crash history ever since it's first test flights!It has killed test and pilots.F-22 in Alaska was escorted by 2 F-18!Australia also has F-18 on land idiot!But they are stationed in naval/land coastal bases!You think they only take off from aircraft carriers,LOL.F-22 is biggest USAF failure,only beaten by F-35.

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog First and foremost I am in the USAF myself, I know there was only one canopy malfunction with the F-22. Yes F-18s do take off from ground bases, however there are no F-18s in Alaska unless a fleet is there, also American pilots are trained to fly without using an GPS and only its MAGNETIC compasses (Which never fail). So there is no way a plane would ever get lost.

    F-22 has its problems, but your exaggerating it a little too much.

  • @UnkownSoldier117

    So you are proposing that I should believe in the fact that USAF's most secretive plane went into training or maybe routine flight all on it's own?I clearly know for the fact that he was escorted by 2 planes.Read the reports.It fell(shows the quality)and wasn't found for 5 days and we gotten excuses.Faster than questions in form off"Well,the bad weather is preventing us to reach the wreckage",lol.Who the f... believes in that???It's piece of aluminum junk!

  • @UnkownSoldier117

    Here,read this article:"Stealth Crash in Alaska Pushes F-22 Raptor Accident Rate Higher"

    It talks about F-22 having worst crash rate record out of any fighter ever produced for USAF!Excluding the planes lost in California and Alaska it had previously 6 A-class rated crashes from 2002' resulting in 100% loss of a plane or both pilot and plane!And those are confirmed cases.Makes you wonder how many unconfirmed there are?All you need is to read idiot,read!

  • @UnkownSoldier117

    The F-22 lost contact with air traffic control around 7:40 p.m. local time on Nov. 16. The crash site was found 100 mi. north of Anchorage, the USAF says. The aircraft was part of a two-ship formation, “Rocky One” and “Rocky Three.” The mishap flight was “Rocky Three” with “Rocky One” unable to locate the crashed aircraft. The crash site was discovered around 10:15 a.m. local time on November 17.

    See wasn't alone!

  • @BoxyTheSpaceDog One thing people do not understand Rocky One who was memorable Capt. Jeffery Haney was to split off and conduct ACM (Air Combat Maneuvers) against Rocky Two. F-22s fight other F-22s just in case they encounter another stealth fighter (PAK-FA, J-20).

    Capt. Jeffery Haney's F-22 OBOGS system failed. Causing him to catch a sever case of hypoxia. While he was passed out, he crashed into the ground.

    The F-22 is the first of its kind, there are going to be problems.

  • @UnkownSoldier117 F-22 is a great plane, but its main issue is cost. You know why Russians never went 100% stealth and even t-50 is not 100%? Because stealth not only relies on to many factors and can be tracked by modern radars, but its also extremely expensive. Effect of that high cost we can see in US economy right now. In the end all wars are decided by the cost effective solutions rather then high tech wonders. Even US themselves are only using good and proven planes up to this date.

  • @allidsarebusy Like I said, the F-22 is the first of its kind.There will be problems with the plane, it is good they are being discovered now so they don't occur again in the future. We are the only country with the technology and ability to procure and maintain a stealth fighter like this.

  • @UnkownSoldier117 No, you know that 40% of technological research at boing is done by Russian engineers? Just no other country is willing to spend so much money on it, or to be more correctly has so much money to spend on it. Stealth technology comes from the Russian scientist called Peter Ufimtsev if you didn't knew ;) Look it up. He was adviser in development of many American planes. B2 F22, Now a big group of Russians is working on F35.

  • @allidsarebusy I know a lot about him, I am also aware that he invented stealth technology. I am also aware that US stole the technology and perfected it. I never onced bashed Russian technology, because it is somewhat impressive. I am just defending the F-22 from physiological arrogant idiots.

  • @UnkownSoldier117 Well as i said, F-22 is a great plane and awesome engineering achievement. But i see things both ways. No need to bash, its stupid, but also no need to make some sort of uber indestructible weapon from it.

  • @AngelXOsaze the F-22 has no-where near the serviceabilty & readiness of the F-16 & F-15 in the US arsenal . The US Navy will have to make do with the 4.5 gen Super Hornet until the JSF is carrier capable so I wouldn't be so snotty. FYI even the basic Mig 29 , in the hands of the Germans at Red Flag gave the Aggressor units a very hard time due to it's agility, and helmet-mounted sighting system which the USAF adopted a few years later .

  • @AngelXOsaze The F-22 is a classic example of a concept put on a pedestal , and after 20 years of spiralling costs , the finished item has a host of faults (inc the Intel processors it was fitted with being being obsolete by Y2k) . Compare that with the A-7 Corsair, based on the F-8 Crusader. It slipped seamlessly into service with the USN & USAF, and had the first HUD of any fighter, and was the most accurate fighter-bomber of its day. Now thats what i call value for money

  • @mmilosbeograd why?

  • @mmilosbeograd

    what plannet you on

  • Wow ,cool

    Ich bin selber ein Flugzeugfan und wenn ich mir das ansehe stellt es mir die Nackenhaare auf.

  • @stefansvacarac91 sure you did post vids of you piloting i belive your just a kid who wants attention

  • У нас на заводе переоборудование началось 7 лет назад, несколько цехов переделали полностью вплоть до кондиционеров в сортире, у нас в цеху котлы с компьютерным управлением и частотные преобразователи на 250 киловатниках

  • Вступление в ВТО и поправка Джейсона-Веника это прежде всего политика и экспорт какие еще нахрен ноу-хау

  • К слову только сегодня видел как разгружали новейший станок

  • На заво