Added: 5 years ago
From: Bacholoji
Views: 346,783
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (327)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 18 people are violinists...

  • The guitar group at my university is transposing this song to play. I get that high pretty soprano viola part. ._.

  • It sounds great but, why isn't the movement syncronized with the music and why is every note a half step lower than the original song?

  • @97violaguy Baroque-pitch is lower then modern concert-pitch. So if there would be something like an "original song", this would be more like it.

  • @97violaguy Some say that Bach's A wasn't 440, but rather was closer to 396. maybe this is why?

  • @97violaguy Some say that Bach's A wasn't 440, but rather was closer to 396. maybe this is why?

  • Comment removed

  • All the folks who swear that "rock & Roll" is an invention of the 1950s need to listen to this.

    They need listen only once, but I guarantee they'll come back countless times, jst to experience the joy of this piece that is closing in on 300 years old.

    300 years... and still as magic as the day it first rang out.

  • @PTCello Your comment there really doesn't prove anything that rock and roll wasn't invented in the 1950's, just that it's a good song...

  • @PTCello

    Um, rock'n'roll is certainly an invention of the 1950s - fast, fun, dancy music obviously has been around for a bit longer ;)

    Just like you'll easily find "swung" rhythms in the late middle ages (or renaissance, I forget), but jazz has been "fused" in the beginning of the 20th century... you know...

    Btw, if you wanna listen to the thrash metal version, look no further than Musica Antiqua Koeln's performance of this movement :D

  • Absolutely love how the viola were given the limelight this time around. They sound amazing! <3

  • they slayin' it. 

  • when it shows all of them moving around and playing, they're having musical sex, with orgasms in their ears

  • it's definetly too fast it's only one big NOISE !!!!! v it's horrible!! i can't hear it anymore

  • a little too fast for the pace

  • @renwenhui Check out the one with Karl Richter. It's a little slower and it you can very audibly hear all the instruments.

  • hahà_lÉútÈ_sUcht_mÅl_ñÂch:_oli­kohle_âÚf_gÔógle_vOll_géÏl

  • Is that Hille Perl?

  • Oh, beautiful music, performed excellently by these musicians.

  • 3:05 OMG she looks like a man!!

    But it doesn't matter when you hear the melody :)

  • This is just beautiful! I love it ever since!

  • この演奏を聴いてこの曲が好きになりました。これを聞くまでは肩­苦しい曲だと思っていましたから。

  • Why am I constantly gasping for breath when listening to Bach? I am in heaven.

  • The sound is so different on this recording, I am not used to this tuning. I prefer it this way!

  • why it's a half-tone lower? don't tell me cause of te stupid instrument tuning please!

  • @NetRunner88 It is. The Akademie Für Alte Musik Berlin recording has the same tuning.

  • Bach is transcendent and spans over time.  No matter what instrument plays his music it still sounds good. This is a best purist musical interpretation of the Concertos. BUT played way to fast and it looses its musicality. If they were slow it down just a bit then you will be able to hear all of the intricacies of the voices. To fast as it is played you get a mush of sound. All be it beautiful, but sounds rushed. I heard it played by other groups at a slower tempo and it is just beautiful.

  • This song kinda reminds me of a calm snowfall in the beginning, then strong wind gusts with increasing snowfall then back to a calm snowfall.

  • @grendelwok I agree. A bit of the intricate interplay between the violas is lost when it's played too presto.

    Even so, I think this is a great performance.

  • This and No. 3 are my favorites

    the US Army Band website has a recording No. 6 on their website for download last time i checked

  • i hate tht the video duznt line up w the sound...otherwise this is my favorite brandenburg concerto

  • how could anyone not love and be transfixed by the beauty of Bach I'll never understand

  • So, what I'm gathering is that this is performed on period instruments. Correct? Can anybody direct me to a link on which I can listen to the same, piece same movement performed on modern instruments so I can compare the sound for myself?

  • Too fast.

  • @robertschelly Period correct instruments. FBO has played this how many thousand times? Like my race driving instructor said: practice makes faster. ;)

    But, yes, a bit too presto. (although 3i does sound better allegro none too moderoso.)

  • @grendelwok The instrument that she played is called viola da gomba

  • at 2:29 that lady with the black hair looks like the mom from the Adams Family :)

  • @pianoking53 Yep V Morticia - but what is that instrument she is playing called?

  • So beautiful......and yet, not a single violin in the ensemble. Bach was truly a German master.

  • whew

  • top video hmm total neu hier wer mag oder will mit mir chattn der meldet sich ja ^^

  • Is the first viola de gamba player, a guy ????

    Anyways, they are so awesome !

  • Is the first viola the gamba a guy ??

    They are awesome !!!!

  • @paclos29

    no, her name is Hille Perl, she is one the best and finest european viola da gamba player nowadays.

  • As a violist, I love this piece. But I do feel sorry for the boring gamba parts. =[

  • like always... YOUR MAJESTY "JOHAN SEBASTIAN BACH"

  • AMOR, FELIZ DÍA!!! 13/07/2010

  • As lovely as this is, the video stops and starts in several places. Wish someone would fix it....however you do that.

  • @OZARKSEK

    I don't think this stopping and restarting has to do with the video. It is probably because of too many internet users, which creates a kind of "traffic jam".

  • how ironic is this life Bach got the ammount of aprox. $60.00 dollars to compousse this 6 concerts for the prince of brandenburg. wooou

  • @LORDSWORDIII ur forgeting inflation lol

  • @BCKM54: I've played this concerto a few times (harpsichord). To me, it is one of the most beautiful to listen to; but from a harpsichordist's standpoint, the 1st and 3rd movements are kinda ... boring. HOWEVER, the second movement is one of the most difficult pieces I've had to play ,,, not only does one get lost in the contrapuntal texture, it is difficult to keep the tempo -- never figured it out -- musta got lost in it (no joke).

  • I beg to differ with some of the commenters; I really enjoy this interpretation. But it is, of course Bach, after all.

  • The gamba player who looks a little like Morticia Adams has the most awesome fingerboard I have ever seen. <3

  • im reading it at school in ear training 2 :D

  • Oh yeah, forgot to add that the tall, languid woman playing the viola is ultra-sexy. Hate to bring human emotions to such beauty, but there you have it.

  • Do you ever hear something so beautiful that it not only makes you smile, it actually brings out a delicious chuckle of delight? Maybe it's my own surprise that anything can have such penetrating depth. This series of videos rocks and I'll leave it to others to debate their merits...I'll merely keep on smiling.

  • @Ashlar62

    Don't wanna be a spammer about it, but being a fan of Reinhard Goebel's interpretation of this movement, everything else (including this) kinda makes me wanna sleep... but that's probably just me. :)

  • So, how many of you out there in YouTube land have actually PLAYED this? I have, the viola parts, and it is GREAT to play! :)

  • @bckm54 yeah its wonderful. theres so many awkward fingers what with all the arppegios if thats what you would call them. except... I played this with a friend and... playing it with someone else its a completely different song and way harder

  • @bckm54 I've played this before, not performed it, but just for fun with friends. I seriously love this piece. XD

  • What is the woman on the far right playing????

  • the 3 musicians right of the harpsichord are playing violae da gamba

  • Hille Perl is so relaxed, plays so effortlessly in this video, the best of the best!

  • Viola da Gamba - didn't he conquer Peru?

  • @SupernalOne hehehe...BRILLIANT! :)

  • @bckm54

    they say you use everything you learn, eventually - so much for early American history - X^)

  • huhugerade ziemlich kuschelbedürftig wer möchte mit mir chilln hab auch ne web cam

  • Bacholoji, I adore your videos.

    Thanks so much for uploading them

    My best wishes

  • Too beautiful!!!!!!!!!!!

  • too fast!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @eaglesgogirl, the instrument you're referring to is called a "viola da gamba".

  • thanks and the second comment i typed was suppose to be violist but i was in a hurry, that is a very neat instrument

  • i meant violinst

  • viola da gamba xD

  • i don't understand your comment

  • First, there are no violinists in this piece. From left to right: Viola, viola, cello, harpsichord, violone (I believe), and two violas da gamba

  • what's the instrument that the woman is playing directly infront of the violinist called?

  • blopcup...i did spell it right haha. and you spelled 'correct' wrong XD

  • this one is definitely too fast, for my tastes.

  • i almost took viola da gamba classes. i'm not even sure that's the right spelling, but i think they're cool. not really familuar w/this concerto as much as the other brandenburgs, it is nice to hear

  • Viola da gamba is the correcy spelling

  • The best one! But I didnt like very much of this version...

  • LOL

  • idiot.

  • the most underestimated movement of all the brandenburg concertos because when it was played on modern instruments it sounded ugly,but authentic instruments bring a totally different sound & such a majestic feeling that simply overwhelms you.

  • @alayeldin That's true of so many pieces. Anybody who has heard Pinchas Zuckerman play baroque music knows exactly what I mean... >_<

  • @alayeldin:  I think it is a sublime movement-- and I also love it because I am a violist. But I disagree with you that it sounds ugly on modern instruments. I think it sounds absolutely gorgeous on modern violas-- with that big, full, round, chocolaty sound that the period instruments don't have. Don't get me wrong-- I like it on period instruments, too-- but there's nothing ugly about it on modern violas.

  • @alayeldin

    Karl Richter's, Il Musici's and others' don't sound ugly.

    Nothing beats Musica Antiqua on these, though.

  • omg it is so beautiful

  • The melody is nice

  • Hille Perl is such a great player. And what an amazing fingerboard on the gamba.

  • Nice

  • That viol is beautiful! And this concerto is amazing :)

  • It's as if you are in the middle of the sea and you receive the waves!

  • What is the name of the group performing this concerto?

  • just read the author's description ;)

    Freiburg Baroque Orchestra

  • Freiburg Baroque Orchestra

  • I think it's the Beatles.

  • There are two ones:

    Viola da gamba = "Violin - CGDA" played on the leg

    Viola da braccia = "Violin - CGDA" played with the arms

    What you see here are the "Bratschen";-)

  • Comment removed

  • The "viola da braccio", commonly called a "viola" ("Bratsche" in German;-), is tuned c-g-d'-a'.

    The "viola da gamba", also called "viol" or "gamba" ("Gambe" in German;-), comes in various sizes and tunings (e.g., pardessus, treble, alto, tenor, bass, etc.). In Bach's day, the term normally referred to the bass viol.

    Of the 2 viols seen here (2:10) , one is the typical 6-string bass viol (D-G-c-e-a-d'). The larger, ornate instrument is a 7-string bass viol (A1-D-G-c-e-a-d').

  • they are both seven stringed

  • Well, all you have to do is count the strings or tuning pegs --- assuming you can see them well enough in this video to actually count them accurately.

    The tuning pegs might be easier to distinguish than the strings.

    I see 7 tuning pegs on the viol with the white pegs.

    I''ll leave it to you to make the effort to scrutinize the video to the count strings or pegs on the other viol.

  • Every sound, tiny or grand, of this masterpiece, is encraved in my head! You present this great work, note by note, feeling by feeling exactly like I hear it in my head. What would I give to be able to play these sounds within my head, as you all do!

  • 'morticca addams' is a transgendered!! Look at 'her' closely It so obvious

  • No. The viola da gambas are the members of the family of viols. It's not the same musical instrument family as the violins' one. Both were developed in the XVI century independently.

  • The viola da gamba appeared in the 1490s. Like the Spanish guitar (a "vihuela") that it was derived from, it has frets and 6 strings tuned by 4ths, except for the middle strings which are tuned a major 3rd apart.

    Various violin-like instruments (with various tunings and 3 to 5 strings) coexisted with viols, but what we would recognize as a modern 4-string violin tuned by 5ths first appeared in Italy, around 1565.

  • Rather 1530....

  • According to my sources the viol first appeared in the late 1400s.

    This is corroborated at the website of the Viola da Gamba Society of America (VdGSA-dot-org) under "About the Viol".

  • The term "violino" (violin) is the diminutive form of "viola", which suggests that the viola appeared before the violin.

  • What are those 6 string cello instruments? I've never seen them before.

  • viol da gama, period instrument, predecessor of the cello.

  • Ah, but the cello is also a "period instrument", as is the violin and viola.

    All the instruments in this performance are "period instruments".

    The viola da gamba predates the violoncello but is not really it's ancestor.

    The cello is really just a big viola.

  • I believe scluna44 meant _archaic_, and that the viola da gamba is the predecessor of the violincello in _position_, not genealogy.

  • They are called viola da gambas.

  • The plural is "violas da gamba".

  • 2:26 dmn! Morticia is pretty!

  • Fabulous!

  • This is by far the best rendition of these concertos I've ever heard. The voices are more than articulate they intertwine in the most sublimely crisp conversation. Excellent job FBO!

  • Great performance, the violas have a a strong sound:)

  • Oh, shut up about the da gambas already! Well, if you are commenting on their playing that's okay:)..... Kidding. seriously, do you want to comment on the actual performance?

  • I love the gambas!

  • Apropos, since in the old TV show Lurch played Harpsichord! Hahaha!

  • youre right... she really does look like morticcia adams!! lol!

  • Ooooo.

  • the one with the black hair looks like that lady from the Adams family

  • She is playig the viola da gamba. Just wanted to inform. (A)

  • yes you are right, that is so cool!

  • Comment removed

  • Great.... just great.

  • what are those cello looking things

  • viola da gambas, i think.

  • Yes, they are viola da Gambas

  • The instruments on the right are definitely violas da gamba. Also the high instruments (on the left) are violas, not violins.

  • power to the violas!

  • MAGIA!

  • As a 63 year old lifelong bach fan I have to say that this is absolutely superb.

  • Wow talk about the WRONG venue to debate something like this, lmao.

    Just appreciate the awesome music and stop taking away from the violas! :P

  • hahaha, yea i agree

    like this a lot

  • I'm sure Bach would have a blast reading our theories on cultural supremacy and homosexuality.

  • /watch?v=V53EvMXBV-I

  • The worst recording I've heard of Brandenburg No. 6 is the Academy of Ancient Music. It sounds yucky and the 2nd solo violist's instrument isn't in tune.

  • video and audio don´t match,, fix it bacholoji,, lol,, thanks,,

  • You Americans should learn that Germany's history did not start with Hitler. There was Bach, Beethoven, and Wagner before him.

  • Indeed, hitler goal was to erase the past. Dont forget that.

  • Unfortunately there hasn't been any great Germans AFTER Hitler. Indeed, European culture seems to have ended at WWII. America seems to be following the same path to mediacraty. :(

  • MSdie! Very good point. At a time that the white / European race is being constantly demeaned -mostly by self-defeating white liberal-minded journalists- you cannot expect anything important coming from them. The demise of the white male in America, which started in the mid-1960s, gave rise to political correctness, homosexuality, and general mediocrity in the arts. I am not a redneck but also I am not here to celebrate further humiliation of my gender and race.

  • I have to disassociate myself from any suggestion that this is a racial thing. It isn't race, it is culture/politics. The Europeans have given up Liberty for security and pleasure. This dimenishes them to the status of children and kills ambition. Lack of ambition results in lack of excelants.

    Soon America is going to go down this road as well I fear.

  • It is a racial issue because the white man is committing suicide biologically speaking. The number of whites is decreasing in absolute numbers. We must eradicate political correctness issues (abortion, etc.) if the western civilizatiojn is to survive. With biological revival, cultural revival will follow too. We need a Pericles-type leader to rejuvenate western civilization.

  • No, it has nothing to do with race. Race itself is a meaningless concept.

    This is a cultural problem. It doesn't matter if the human race consists of people of European ancestory, Arab ancestory or African ancestory. What does matter is their culture -- does it elevate human beings or bring them down to an animal existance.

  • Race has nothing to do with it. Race is in fact a European concept which never existed in any other part of the world before. There is no biological difference between a white and non-white other than the amount of melanin in their skin. A little scientific understanding would help. Racism is a terrible sin.

  • Nice to see you're spouting the post modern relativist nonsense you learned during your 12 year spate of government forced education.

    Way to go!

  • Racism is sinful. Hmm. You're right, I'M crazy!

  • RUMP: You misunderstood me. I don't believe in racial supremacy when we refer to individuals. But the European people's culture is by far superior to any African, Amerindian or Asian (with the possible exception of the Chinese / japanese). The Greeks had a written language with verbs, nouns and adjectives back in 9th century b.C. Tell that to the Sub-Saharan Africans who were never capable of developing a written language of their own. You cannot create civilization without a written language.

  • No. Almost all native americans had a writing system. In fact, the mayans had a way better calendar than the western civilization had when they first arrived in the new world. Most cultures also had more cures for disease than Europeans. They also weren't killing each other because of religious differences. I could go on and on.

  • RUMP: "writing system"? What do you mean by writing system. Was it a language? Was it a means to store information for the future generations? Of course not! Re: the Mayans. Dit they know that the earth is a sphere? Heratosthenes, a Greek mathematician, had calculated the earth's circumference, and missed it by some 100 km (out of 40,000.) Don't ALLOW POLITICAL CORRECTNESS TO BLIND YOUR ABILITY TO THINK RATIONALLY.

  • Scipop1492, I suspect you are an ardent homophobe. The funny thing is that before WWII homosexuality wasn't even an issue, even for homosexuals, since it just wasn't an option. By that I don't mean that it was overtly frowned upon, but that it wasn't even an option for gay men. The concept was simply unthinkable. You couldn't have chosen to "come out" (even if allowable) because the very concept was non existent.

  • Oddly, enough males tended to show more affection to one and other because it wasn't seen as making them "sissies". Television before the 60s rather than promoting extreme heterosexuality, promoted the complete opposite. Not homosexuality, but chauvinism. Therefore it was perfectly fine for males of all ages to show affection, although not overtly sexual behaviour. Though homosexual sexplay certainly went on behind closed doors; not that it's any business of yours.

  • scipio1492, it seems you've missed the point. Not all homosexual men want to engage in that unspeakable practice you mentioned. And, although it can be cured as you say, probably with extreme violence (and I have no doubt you support such), you don't necessarily have the right to force that upon anyone.

    Another thing you seem oblivious to is that plenty of homosexual men are themselves displeased with the "rot" of cultural Marxism. Homosexuality is after all a form of chauvinism. cont.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • the instrument with the cool neck design is a basse de viole or viola da gamba. who is that playing it? Is that Hille Perl?

  • Whats the instrument with the cool neck design?

    It looks like a cello, but is that how you hold the bow for a cello?

  • They're playing it quite fast.

  • go violas!!!!!! yay!!!!

  • Christian Goosses viola 1 And Annette Schmidt viola 2 are Great musician

  • Ulrike Kaufmann is playing viola 2, not Annette Schmidt.

  • Right Thanks

  • Comment removed

  • and what a strange comments! just listen to the music... my god! that is the genius Bach! What the hell are you talking about...

  • sorry to tex: just listen to the music but what would i know after all i am a eastend boy who is a butler and they is nothing better then listening to toff who think they know it all . . . i must say there are some very lovely ladys in this group . .