UFO and remote mind reading/manipulation technology was developed by the nazis by the end of WW2 without any alien help. : there is an extreme criminal orgonizaiton working withing high ranks of the US military waging psychological against the general population pretending to be extradimensional aliens and/or angelic and demonic forces often using holograms. ( ET life would look nothing like us, the greys look like mutated people)
Gramham Hancock is just MAD that science will not go along w/his conspiratorial pseudo-science. Much like Christians don't like science because science won't LIE & support their Bronze Age view of the world.The science of climate change is settled, CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising at rates never seen before, CO2 traps heat & therefore is the primary reason behind the rise in global temperature & HUMANS are the primary driver behind the rise in CO2! Turn off the QUACKERY read the science!
I strongly suggest you head over to Potholer54's channel to see the verifiable facts from peer reviewed literature, not opinion driven political myths.
@Viracocha711 There is no "science" behind climate change. What lies behind the changes in earth's climate is an incomprehensibly complex series of celestial movements and energies, only a few of which we understand or even acknowledge. AGW only works as a theory if you consider earth a closed system, which it is NOT. Also, it is not possible to "tell" the truth. Truth is KNOWN. Language is incapable of conveying actual truth.
@ScottishNonBeliever Do you realize what you say does not make any sense??? It seems YOU have not done your research, and are seeing precisely what big oil wants you to see. Yuumm, how do you like your cool aid?
@ScottishNonBeliever Again, those that deny man-made global warming, try running your car (CO2) with the garage doors closed. See what happens. You don't need to be a scientist to do empirical research.
There is no doubt that we all aspire to see a day where everyone has a sustainable clean energy supply. However, one has to be careful when listening to environmentalists. It is unfortunate that most of those wearing the "green hat" are basically anti-foreign-oil; hence, you see that oil imports are highly taxed (for example in the UK, the tax on oil is +100% from its original value!). Indeed, these countries that back anti-oil initiatives are the ones that benefit the most out of it.
One might say the humble banana is not genetically engineered but is it really ?. One can live on bananas alone getting all the nutrients one needs . One has to ask why is this seedless herb is found all over the world even on remote virgin islands . The simple banana is evidence that there may have been genetically engineering long before man existed or are we repeating just another cycle of mans very own destruction that dates back literally millions if not billions of years?
it is no mistake that the sphinx has a lions body and Ningazita's face. it was built to celebrate Ningazita's accomplishment at building the pyramids. it was placed facing east showing the rise of Leo. his astronomical sign. Marduk Enki's first born was upset and demanded to have his likeness put upon the sphinx . fyi... marduk is Ra.. the (son )God, Ra refers to Enki's son as a god not sun. Marduk first born son of Enki was in the end given earth to rule.
once again if you read "the lost book of enki". an auto biography of the Gods on earth. it clearly explains the presents of a highly advanced race of beings. if fact i can name the Sumerian god that went to this land. his name was Ninerta . first born son of Enlil. he wasn't the only one to build in South America. ningazita the second born son of Enki also built cities in South America. it is also written that ningazita also built the pyramids of Giza. the Sphinx was to have his likeness.
A couple of problems - he sates that the last iceage came to an end in 1000-2000 years but if you look at the Vostok ice core data it clearly took over 10000 year just like all the previous ones did.
He also gets all mixed up with the precession argument. It is actually the ccentricity of the earth's orbit that is the main factor, not precession which merely contributes to making the effect larger or smaller, longer or shorter.
@sangstar1 They are not a "Hoax"...Al Gore misrepresented some things & should not have because all it did was give science deniers ammo to continue spreading true LIES! Anthropomorphic Climate Change is a FACT & those who deny this are no different than Young Earth Creationist, Flat Earthers, 9/11 Truthers, Holocaust Deniers, Moon Landing deniers, etc., It amazes me how popular it is to be willfully STUPID!
@Viracocha711 'science deniers' ??? are you serious? flat earthers?? you watch WAY too much tv my american friend.. i would suggest a dose of Psilocybin mushrooms so you can squeegee your third eye clean... one mans finger bowl my friend... what you just wrote seems to me to be as stupid as you can get!! i forgive you... but expect more from a veteran.
@WodeBolder I watch way too much TV so i should eat some shrums? Yeah, that has to be the most intelligent advice I have ever been given! LOL! Thanks!
@Viracocha711 Ok, but tell me how that movie has no "validity" instead of just saying it doesn't. The evidence is not clear at all for Anthropogenic global warming. You just think that it's "fact" when in reality it is just a theory and a very shaky one. Please read this article and tell me what you think. holoscience(dot)com(slash)news(dot)php?article=8pjd9xpp
@astralwalk You link does not work...Yes I removed all the (dot) (slash) & replaced them. Feel free to send me the link in amessage. I find it quite telling that you say "it is just a theory" which suggest to me you have no idea what a Scientific Theory really is. Plus, you want me to trust Right Wing websites over scientist who have been studying this for decades? Let me guess, do you also think the Theory of Evolution is "just a theory" as well? Is it too a "very shaky theory" as well?
@Viracocha711 Ok, You can go to my channel and in the description I have a heading which says "Simple Proof Global Warming is Not Man Made" the link I gave you is there along with one more. And by the way it is not a "right wing" website at all, it is the website of a plasma cosmologist. If your talking about Darwinian theory, YES! Darwinian theory is being discarded by many researchers as we speak. By the way, I didn't hear why Church of Global Warming is not valid?
@astralwalk What is "Darwinian Theory"?? The article "Simple Proof Global Warming is Not Man Made" the author Dr. David Evans does not have a PhD in Climate Science, has NEVER published a paper on Climate Science, has only published ONE paper in his entire career & it had NOTHING to do with climate science, he has close ties to the MINING INDUSTRY & Right Wing Party in Australia & been labeled a FRAUD 4 calling himself a rocket scientist & 4 claiming he worked for Microsoft...NEITHER R TRUE!
@Viracocha711 Darwin's Theory of Evolution is what darwinian theory is. Once again, all you can do is talk fallacies. I don't hear any actual facts as to why The Church of Global Warming is wrong, and why those articles are wrong. Please, instead of just saying it is not valid, say WHY.
@Viracocha711 And since you would like a peer reviewed paper from climate scientists who disagree with AGW here google this. "Heat Capacity, Time Constant, and Sensitivity of Earth's Climate System" Guess what Carbon Dioxide makes up about 0.038% of our atmosphere, of which human contribution is a tiny fraction. The idea that our tiny fraction of carbon emissions (a natural life sustaining gas) is going to cause mass catastrophe is absurd. AGW is being used to coopt the environmental movement.
@astralwalk I am not saying this to insult you but your comment shows the utter ignorance you have when it comes to CO2 in the atmosphere & what role it plays in warming the climate. Not only that but especially how science works...Stephen Schwartz , the author of the paper you mentioned, is NOT in anyway contradicting the consensus of AGW he simply explores one way to estimate climate sensitivity & warns his method is in need of further study...Are you aware of those "further studies"?
@Viracocha711 Still waiting for you to tell me why the Church of Global Warming is not valid. I didn't say Carbon Dioxide doesn't play a role in warming the climate, just that carbon dioxide has been rising since the end of the last ice age and was rising steadily before the industrial era and that the idea that humans can control how the Earth regulates climate by reducing our carbon emisssions is stupid.
@astralwalk The Movie does what all denial movies do & that is twist the science or outright LIE...Urban heating BS, claiming the Sat data pointed to cooling when that has long been debunked, false claim that there is no consensus by climate scientist,etc., CO2 has risen faster in the last 100yrs than it has in the last 10,000yrs! Again, you really don't know what you are talking about...Especially when you say things like "Darwinian Theory" LOL! Take care.
@Viracocha711 Darwinian theory is in the dictionary, check it out, called a suffix. The climate has changed before and it will change now and in the future, no amount of taxes is going to stop that, anyway while corporations are committing ecocide and genocide in undeveloped countries your all worrying about levels of a life sustaining gas. And your going to listen to climate scientists like their gods when they do shit like climategate? There is absolutely no basis for catastrophic predictions.
@astralwalk There was nothing to climate gate except for the scientific illiterate not understanding what they were talking about. There have been 4 independent investigations that clearly show no wrong doing. You don't even understand the Theory of Evolution how the hell are you going to understand the science behind climate change? I feel sorrow for folks like yourself but there is nothing I can do other than tell you the truth. If I thought you were interested in the truth I would continue.
@Viracocha711 "Nothing to climategate"? Why are you people so desperate to be right? The "independent" investigations were just created to cover their tracks, the emails speak for themselves! What are talking about I don't undestand the Theory of Evolution? On what do you base that? Your idea that "darwinian" is not a word when actually it is, go have a look at a dictionary. I understand that many researches are leaving Darwin's theory as impossible, check out dissent from darwin blog.
@Viracocha711 You don't have truth, you have a collection of opinions which have been given to you by other people including the UN, the media and "experts" such as climate scientists who many people do not agree with and who have been proven to outright lie (climategate), there is no basis for catastrophic predictions due to carbon dioxide increase, it's a sidetracking of the environmental movement to take focus away from REAL issues such as Chevron in the South American rainforest.
@sangstar1 Al Gore's chart was NOT "Al Gore's chart" it was Micheal Mann's a CLIMATE SCIENTIST! Micheal Mann's chart has been replicated several other scientific organizations! And just this year Richard Muller, a physicist from UC Berkley & egotistical climate change skeptic, released his findings of a two year study funded by hard core climate change DENIERS the Koch Bros. & the chart matched EXACTLY the chart Al Gore used in his move! Now, stop with the BS & go read a science book!!
@drkstrong OMG what he said is the the ice cover sheet ended in about 1000-2000 years. Not that the last ice age came to an end on that date. Pay attention to 0:27:30 and you will hear it. O.o
He didn't say that. He said that the ice cover which was there melted entirely over a period of 1000-2000 years. ie, about 10,000 years ago, it started to melt and had completely melted during a period of 1 to 2 thousand years
@pianoplayeruk There are three fundamental flaws in the 'other planets are warming' argument. First, not all planets in the solar system are warming (6 on 100 bodies). Second, the sun has shown no long term trend since 1950 and in fact has shown a slight cooling trend in recent decades. Third, there are explanations for why other planets are warming. Fourth, you got owned.
I didnt say carbon monoxide from car exhausts is harmless. I said global warming is caused by the sun.
Of course humans should show far greater responsibility for pollution in every sense of the word, but to suggest that CO2 is causing global warming is nonsense.
@pianoplayeruk it is NOT non-sense! It's aggravated by the sun, but CO2 is thinning the ozone layer!! We are exhausting the planet! You have two things colliding!!! Yes, the Sun is a big part of it, but it's absolutely stupid to say that carbon emissions is not responsible for it either!!! You dumb fuck!! (and I only say that because you called me a fucking dick), otherwise, peace to you.
@drkstrong Well. I would disagree with you on that. I may not be an expert on the field in which Graham is talking about but I could however see logical flow of ideas in his argument and see no mix up. I think he's trying hard to point out anomalies. I've read a couple of of similar books that point similar anomalies in archaeology like "Forbidden Archaeology" which talks about certain evidence that is not being explained. However, I do not get the "mixed up" part that you are putting forth.
@drkstrong There are many experimental ways in a lab to mimic precession, thus, many theories to explain the Earth's precession. Personally, I enjoy the beauty of the binary star model, though it could one day be ruled out.
Graham Hancock is just a man with an agenda ... alot of books to sell .....
and gullible people are making him rich.....so he keeps peddling his brand of Pseudoscience
daijazz 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
UFO and remote mind reading/manipulation technology was developed by the nazis by the end of WW2 without any alien help. : there is an extreme criminal orgonizaiton working withing high ranks of the US military waging psychological against the general population pretending to be extradimensional aliens and/or angelic and demonic forces often using holograms. ( ET life would look nothing like us, the greys look like mutated people)
hope4world3000 1 month ago
Gramham Hancock is just MAD that science will not go along w/his conspiratorial pseudo-science. Much like Christians don't like science because science won't LIE & support their Bronze Age view of the world.The science of climate change is settled, CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising at rates never seen before, CO2 traps heat & therefore is the primary reason behind the rise in global temperature & HUMANS are the primary driver behind the rise in CO2! Turn off the QUACKERY read the science!
Viracocha711 2 months ago
Comment removed
kaostwenty2 3 weeks ago
@kaostwenty2 No, Viracocha was the pre-Inca to Inca creator god who created everything including civilization...NOT MAYA!
So, other than telling me that you don't know what you are talking about did you have a point?
Viracocha711 3 weeks ago
@Viracocha711 I apologize, I thought you said "MAD" to graham! Then I read properly and I rtealized I made a gaffe :) sorry again. VIRACOCHA ;)
kaostwenty2 3 weeks ago
odd titling, as this video barely mentions global warming/climate change.. but still very interesting
skullpepper 3 months ago
Unforgettably it is true,we are taxed for NO good reason other than political propaganda ,wealth.
About time we use the data , its time for the truth.
years we have known The world's poles are on a flip,happened before ,happening Now.
Sun shows changing cycles.
We monitor distant streams of cosmic rays & what not, all have some effect to US, our Planets, The Sun. ,etc , etc
look the data up
Please stop this ridiculous campaign that we are the NET contributors causing change and get real
redneckhillbillyjon 3 months ago
I strongly suggest you head over to Potholer54's channel to see the verifiable facts from peer reviewed literature, not opinion driven political myths.
TedSmithII 3 months ago
@Viracocha711 There is no "science" behind climate change. What lies behind the changes in earth's climate is an incomprehensibly complex series of celestial movements and energies, only a few of which we understand or even acknowledge. AGW only works as a theory if you consider earth a closed system, which it is NOT. Also, it is not possible to "tell" the truth. Truth is KNOWN. Language is incapable of conveying actual truth.
stvbrsn 3 months ago
climateaudit(dot) org These alarmists don't have a leg to stand on.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@ScottishNonBeliever "Someone that doesn't know his arse from his elbow is shouting the facts at us all over youtube" you mean, YOU?
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ScottishNonBeliever black rich yummy oil streaks....
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@ScottishNonBeliever huummm...yummy...cool aid with oil streaks....
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@ScottishNonBeliever Do you realize what you say does not make any sense??? It seems YOU have not done your research, and are seeing precisely what big oil wants you to see. Yuumm, how do you like your cool aid?
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@ScottishNonBeliever The only "scientists" refuting this are the ones paid by the oil companies. Keep on drinking the cool aid, dude.
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@ScottishNonBeliever You can even add ice on a glass of water if you want, just to see if it stays that way.
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@ScottishNonBeliever Again, those that deny man-made global warming, try running your car (CO2) with the garage doors closed. See what happens. You don't need to be a scientist to do empirical research.
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
Climate change is their PR of nuclear power and the stupid
JonThm 5 months ago
There level of carbon dioxide in the air is controlled by photosynthesis. Is has not changed in 200 years.
JonThm 5 months ago
There is no doubt that we all aspire to see a day where everyone has a sustainable clean energy supply. However, one has to be careful when listening to environmentalists. It is unfortunate that most of those wearing the "green hat" are basically anti-foreign-oil; hence, you see that oil imports are highly taxed (for example in the UK, the tax on oil is +100% from its original value!). Indeed, these countries that back anti-oil initiatives are the ones that benefit the most out of it.
bwr20 6 months ago
Rather interesting perspective.
Very plausible.
canebluff 6 months ago
Nicely done.
Samir Kassim-Lakha
samirlakha 6 months ago
One might say the humble banana is not genetically engineered but is it really ?. One can live on bananas alone getting all the nutrients one needs . One has to ask why is this seedless herb is found all over the world even on remote virgin islands . The simple banana is evidence that there may have been genetically engineering long before man existed or are we repeating just another cycle of mans very own destruction that dates back literally millions if not billions of years?
chotaboy66 6 months ago
Now I just wonder what lies behind that door in the great pyramid...
DutchTimmie 6 months ago
the Annunaki chronicled three major earth changes including a global warming that forced them to build their cities further north
proslice56 6 months ago
it is no mistake that the sphinx has a lions body and Ningazita's face. it was built to celebrate Ningazita's accomplishment at building the pyramids. it was placed facing east showing the rise of Leo. his astronomical sign. Marduk Enki's first born was upset and demanded to have his likeness put upon the sphinx . fyi... marduk is Ra.. the (son )God, Ra refers to Enki's son as a god not sun. Marduk first born son of Enki was in the end given earth to rule.
proslice56 6 months ago
once again if you read "the lost book of enki". an auto biography of the Gods on earth. it clearly explains the presents of a highly advanced race of beings. if fact i can name the Sumerian god that went to this land. his name was Ninerta . first born son of Enlil. he wasn't the only one to build in South America. ningazita the second born son of Enki also built cities in South America. it is also written that ningazita also built the pyramids of Giza. the Sphinx was to have his likeness.
proslice56 6 months ago
A couple of problems - he sates that the last iceage came to an end in 1000-2000 years but if you look at the Vostok ice core data it clearly took over 10000 year just like all the previous ones did.
He also gets all mixed up with the precession argument. It is actually the ccentricity of the earth's orbit that is the main factor, not precession which merely contributes to making the effect larger or smaller, longer or shorter.
drkstrong 6 months ago
@drkstrong You are using Al Gore’s chart Those “findings” are not true. They are a hoax.
sangstar1 6 months ago 7
@sangstar1 The only "scientists" refuting this are the ones paid by the oil companies. Keep on drinking the cool aid, dude.
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@sangstar1 They are not a "Hoax"...Al Gore misrepresented some things & should not have because all it did was give science deniers ammo to continue spreading true LIES! Anthropomorphic Climate Change is a FACT & those who deny this are no different than Young Earth Creationist, Flat Earthers, 9/11 Truthers, Holocaust Deniers, Moon Landing deniers, etc., It amazes me how popular it is to be willfully STUPID!
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 'science deniers' ??? are you serious? flat earthers?? you watch WAY too much tv my american friend.. i would suggest a dose of Psilocybin mushrooms so you can squeegee your third eye clean... one mans finger bowl my friend... what you just wrote seems to me to be as stupid as you can get!! i forgive you... but expect more from a veteran.
WodeBolder 4 months ago
@WodeBolder I watch way too much TV so i should eat some shrums? Yeah, that has to be the most intelligent advice I have ever been given! LOL! Thanks!
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 But it is not a fact, it is a theory and a very shaky and UNPROVEN one, please watch The Church of Global Warming.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@astralwalk No thanks...I read the science journals.
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 And you even refuse to look at the possible validity of opposing views, just like a true religious believer.
astralwalk 4 months ago
Comment removed
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 Ok, but tell me how that movie has no "validity" instead of just saying it doesn't. The evidence is not clear at all for Anthropogenic global warming. You just think that it's "fact" when in reality it is just a theory and a very shaky one. Please read this article and tell me what you think. holoscience(dot)com(slash)news(dot)php?article=8pjd9xpp
astralwalk 4 months ago
@astralwalk You link does not work...Yes I removed all the (dot) (slash) & replaced them. Feel free to send me the link in amessage. I find it quite telling that you say "it is just a theory" which suggest to me you have no idea what a Scientific Theory really is. Plus, you want me to trust Right Wing websites over scientist who have been studying this for decades? Let me guess, do you also think the Theory of Evolution is "just a theory" as well? Is it too a "very shaky theory" as well?
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 Ok, You can go to my channel and in the description I have a heading which says "Simple Proof Global Warming is Not Man Made" the link I gave you is there along with one more. And by the way it is not a "right wing" website at all, it is the website of a plasma cosmologist. If your talking about Darwinian theory, YES! Darwinian theory is being discarded by many researchers as we speak. By the way, I didn't hear why Church of Global Warming is not valid?
astralwalk 4 months ago
@astralwalk What is "Darwinian Theory"?? The article "Simple Proof Global Warming is Not Man Made" the author Dr. David Evans does not have a PhD in Climate Science, has NEVER published a paper on Climate Science, has only published ONE paper in his entire career & it had NOTHING to do with climate science, he has close ties to the MINING INDUSTRY & Right Wing Party in Australia & been labeled a FRAUD 4 calling himself a rocket scientist & 4 claiming he worked for Microsoft...NEITHER R TRUE!
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 Darwin's Theory of Evolution is what darwinian theory is. Once again, all you can do is talk fallacies. I don't hear any actual facts as to why The Church of Global Warming is wrong, and why those articles are wrong. Please, instead of just saying it is not valid, say WHY.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 And since you would like a peer reviewed paper from climate scientists who disagree with AGW here google this. "Heat Capacity, Time Constant, and Sensitivity of Earth's Climate System" Guess what Carbon Dioxide makes up about 0.038% of our atmosphere, of which human contribution is a tiny fraction. The idea that our tiny fraction of carbon emissions (a natural life sustaining gas) is going to cause mass catastrophe is absurd. AGW is being used to coopt the environmental movement.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@astralwalk I am not saying this to insult you but your comment shows the utter ignorance you have when it comes to CO2 in the atmosphere & what role it plays in warming the climate. Not only that but especially how science works...Stephen Schwartz , the author of the paper you mentioned, is NOT in anyway contradicting the consensus of AGW he simply explores one way to estimate climate sensitivity & warns his method is in need of further study...Are you aware of those "further studies"?
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 Still waiting for you to tell me why the Church of Global Warming is not valid. I didn't say Carbon Dioxide doesn't play a role in warming the climate, just that carbon dioxide has been rising since the end of the last ice age and was rising steadily before the industrial era and that the idea that humans can control how the Earth regulates climate by reducing our carbon emisssions is stupid.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@astralwalk The Movie does what all denial movies do & that is twist the science or outright LIE...Urban heating BS, claiming the Sat data pointed to cooling when that has long been debunked, false claim that there is no consensus by climate scientist,etc., CO2 has risen faster in the last 100yrs than it has in the last 10,000yrs! Again, you really don't know what you are talking about...Especially when you say things like "Darwinian Theory" LOL! Take care.
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 Darwinian theory is in the dictionary, check it out, called a suffix. The climate has changed before and it will change now and in the future, no amount of taxes is going to stop that, anyway while corporations are committing ecocide and genocide in undeveloped countries your all worrying about levels of a life sustaining gas. And your going to listen to climate scientists like their gods when they do shit like climategate? There is absolutely no basis for catastrophic predictions.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@astralwalk There was nothing to climate gate except for the scientific illiterate not understanding what they were talking about. There have been 4 independent investigations that clearly show no wrong doing. You don't even understand the Theory of Evolution how the hell are you going to understand the science behind climate change? I feel sorrow for folks like yourself but there is nothing I can do other than tell you the truth. If I thought you were interested in the truth I would continue.
Viracocha711 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 "Nothing to climategate"? Why are you people so desperate to be right? The "independent" investigations were just created to cover their tracks, the emails speak for themselves! What are talking about I don't undestand the Theory of Evolution? On what do you base that? Your idea that "darwinian" is not a word when actually it is, go have a look at a dictionary. I understand that many researches are leaving Darwin's theory as impossible, check out dissent from darwin blog.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@Viracocha711 You don't have truth, you have a collection of opinions which have been given to you by other people including the UN, the media and "experts" such as climate scientists who many people do not agree with and who have been proven to outright lie (climategate), there is no basis for catastrophic predictions due to carbon dioxide increase, it's a sidetracking of the environmental movement to take focus away from REAL issues such as Chevron in the South American rainforest.
astralwalk 4 months ago
@sangstar1 Al Gore's chart was NOT "Al Gore's chart" it was Micheal Mann's a CLIMATE SCIENTIST! Micheal Mann's chart has been replicated several other scientific organizations! And just this year Richard Muller, a physicist from UC Berkley & egotistical climate change skeptic, released his findings of a two year study funded by hard core climate change DENIERS the Koch Bros. & the chart matched EXACTLY the chart Al Gore used in his move! Now, stop with the BS & go read a science book!!
Viracocha711 2 months ago
@sangstar1 Yes, Al Gore is dodgy as.
Martroid 1 month ago
@drkstrong OMG what he said is the the ice cover sheet ended in about 1000-2000 years. Not that the last ice age came to an end on that date. Pay attention to 0:27:30 and you will hear it. O.o
rodrigotorniai 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drkstrong
Pay attention.
He didn't say that. He said that the ice cover which was there melted entirely over a period of 1000-2000 years. ie, about 10,000 years ago, it started to melt and had completely melted during a period of 1 to 2 thousand years
He's speaking about duration, not years ago.
pianoplayeruk 6 months ago
@drkstrong Sorry, you're well wrong.
BLAGASPANTS 6 months ago
@drkstrong
Al Gore is well known to be a huge fan of the lies of global warming.
Fact:
The entire solar system is getting warmer. Instruments used to measure temperatures of the other planets confirm this.
Perhaps Al Gore and his fake global warming buddies would mind answering this question:
How is Earth's temperature increase affecting the other planets?
Answer:
Earth's temperature cannot effect other planets.
The Sun is responsible for global warming, not carbon emissions.
pianoplayeruk 6 months ago
@pianoplayeruk There are three fundamental flaws in the 'other planets are warming' argument. First, not all planets in the solar system are warming (6 on 100 bodies). Second, the sun has shown no long term trend since 1950 and in fact has shown a slight cooling trend in recent decades. Third, there are explanations for why other planets are warming. Fourth, you got owned.
sentenced988 5 months ago
@sentenced988
Just the kind of reply I would expect from a mouthy self opinionated twat whose clearly done inadequate research.
Aside from which, my comment was directed at another person, not you.
Don't bother to reply. I haven't the slightest interest in anything you might have to say.
pianoplayeruk 5 months ago
FU!!! you think carbon emissions do not cause any damage? try running your car with you inside a garage, see what happens.
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@bluehoneycomb
Don't be such a fucking dick!
I didnt say carbon monoxide from car exhausts is harmless. I said global warming is caused by the sun.
Of course humans should show far greater responsibility for pollution in every sense of the word, but to suggest that CO2 is causing global warming is nonsense.
pianoplayeruk 5 months ago
@pianoplayeruk it is NOT non-sense! It's aggravated by the sun, but CO2 is thinning the ozone layer!! We are exhausting the planet! You have two things colliding!!! Yes, the Sun is a big part of it, but it's absolutely stupid to say that carbon emissions is not responsible for it either!!! You dumb fuck!! (and I only say that because you called me a fucking dick), otherwise, peace to you.
bluehoneycomb 5 months ago
@pianoplayeruk Al Gore and his family own shares in Oil firms. Funny that.
konjyoman 5 months ago
@konjyoman
I rest my case your honour.
pianoplayeruk 5 months ago
@drkstrong Well. I would disagree with you on that. I may not be an expert on the field in which Graham is talking about but I could however see logical flow of ideas in his argument and see no mix up. I think he's trying hard to point out anomalies. I've read a couple of of similar books that point similar anomalies in archaeology like "Forbidden Archaeology" which talks about certain evidence that is not being explained. However, I do not get the "mixed up" part that you are putting forth.
blackta10n 5 months ago
@drkstrong i don't understand.. i thought the eccentricity of the earths orbit is what creates the procession?? please explain?
WodeBolder 4 months ago
@drkstrong There are many experimental ways in a lab to mimic precession, thus, many theories to explain the Earth's precession. Personally, I enjoy the beauty of the binary star model, though it could one day be ruled out.
jgbloyd 4 months ago