Added: 3 years ago
From: sanderson1611
Views: 455,903
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (14,496)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • E-P-I-C. :)

  • Dude they are not being cruel. They have checkpoints to make sure there arnt people smuggling drugs

  • that border guy sounds like he should be deported..

  • This guy is a legend - know your rights!

  • Comment removed

  • This guy is a patriot.

  • fuck that sucks

  • you are the man!!!!!!!

  • DUDE ALL THEY WANTED TO DO IS TO SEE IF UR HIDING SOMETHING IN UR CAR. U DIDNT WANNA TO SHOW THEM UR DRIVERS LICENSE IS IT EXPIRED?

    IF UR A FIREMAN , SO U SEE A LOT OF DEAD BODIES DO YOU GET FREE COUNSELING ONCE A WEEK? THEY LET U GO COS THEY RUN UR PLATE NUMBER, I THINK UR A FIREMAN , U REPEAT WORDS ALOT, BUT DO YOU TAKE SOME MEDICATION( ANTIANXIETY)?

  • @detroitcarshow

    If they want to see if he's hiding something unlawful... they would need Consent or Probable Cause to search. Border Patrol Agents at these types of checkpoints have no say regarding a Driver's License.

  • @josacape OK, I HEAR U, BUT HE COULD BE A FIREMAN WHO JUST HAD A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN AND KILLED HIS WIFE AND HER BLOOD IS IN HIS CAR, WHY HE WAS ARGUING FOR 30 MIN WITH THEM IF THEY JUST DO THEIR JOB?

    BEING A FIREMAN HE IS UNDER ALOT OF STRESS, SO I THINK HE USES THE WORD CONSTITUTION ALOT.MY CBP OFFICER STRIP SEARCH ME I HAD A PAD I WAS ON MY PERIOD SHE TOUGHT I AM TERRORIST, THAT TELLS U SHE WORKS LONG HOURS OR DRINKS TOO MUCH CAFFEINE,I WISH I WAS A SHRINK , OFFICER EMERY NEED HELP!

  • @detroitcarshow

    Or He Could be a Fireman who just wanted to standup for his Rights. But then again, *He Could* be a Magic Unicorn in disguise.

    If you noticed... he didn't want to stay there for 30 minutes, but the agents would not let him leave even though they had no Lawful grounds to continue the Detention. I don't think detaining someone unreasonably is part of their job.

  • @josacape I RESPECT FIREMEN, BUT I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY HE REPEATS THE SAME WORDS MANY TIMES? IS HE ON SOME ANTI ANXIETY MED OR HE SMOKES WEED?

  • The dude with the video camera is a fuckin asshole, wouldn't mind seeing a little police brutality with that guy.

  • @arrowhead5709 You are what is wrong with the world.

  • Nun Chucks are standard issue for boarder patrol officers? 

  • Probably cause is not a guess that something might be up. These clowns need some training.

  • All thatfor nothing!!! LOL 

  • holly shit man you are a god i was for sure you was about to lose a window got to love our constitutional right!

  • HELL YA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • yeah..since the internal border got removed in europe the border patrol is running on the highways here too but I can tell you no military like checkpoints existing neither in Germany,France nor Spain..I know te US pretty welll..have family in Canada,Sweden,Spain,Poland and Germany and each and any European Citizen enjoys more freedom than you guys over there...Americans keep lying to themselfs about freedom...Europe is free..US is not

  • All this from the nice pieces of shit in uniform paid with citizen money.. They just want power over people. They want you to kiss their asses. And they beleave to deserve respect.

    Sue those out of control bastards pigs.

    And he has the nerves to say you're acting suspicious because you stands for his right.

  • I LOVE IT THANK GOD FOR REAL MEN LIKE THIS!!!!!!!

  • And this is how you waste the time of the people who keep our country safe. Way to go. You should be real proud of yourself.

  • You sir are a giant tool

  • These stops go smooth if you don't act like a jackass toward agents.

  • They go even smoother when agents don't act like jackasses to the people they seize absent suspicion TheJayCor

  • Really why would you do that

  • he said 78 times "I wanna go on my way"

  • awesome video.well done. fuck these stupid pieces of shit. low-life no talent civil service fuckheads. ;)

  • trollin the border patrol like a boss

  • This really irritates me... youre an American? right? well fking respect the federal law enforcement officers in YOUR Country and every other American working/fighting for your RIGHTS to be a shmuck.... why do you have to be a pansy ass because you want to try and prove some dumb shit.. youre a coward.. you would have been out of there within 10 minutes had you just followed there requests.. youre pathetic to call yourself an American

  • @prsxefod: I see no reason to respect a Border Patrol agent that isn't following the law.

    He would have been out of there in less the 30 seconds if the agent had understood the limitations the Supreme Court has placed on him at this type of checkpoint.

  • @prsxefod

    Don't worry, there are people in this country who are hardcore conservative Republicans who believe in little to no government and feel they are "harassed" by Border Patrol asking to state their citizenship (required by law by the way), when driving on highways 100 miles within the border. They feel they are entitled to tell them to fuck off. Check out CheckpointUSA, his videos he snapshots agents and their names to bounty them to cartel assasins.

  • AA72AA72, while you're busy making ridiculous claims, why don't you cite us the law you keep referring to.

    Also - thanks for advertising my youtube channel. Don't forget to point them to my website & blog as well.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    So you want me to promote your channel and your website, you are welcome.

    CheckpointUSA is a domestic terrorist, CheckpointUSA is a domestic terrorist. CheckpointUSA is a domestic terrorist, Checkpoint USA is a domestic terrorist. CheckpointUSA is a domestic terrorist. Checkpoint USA is a domesitc terrorist. CheckpointUSA is a domestic terrorist. Checkpoint USA is a domestic terrorist. CheckpointUSA is a domestic terrorist. Checkpoint USA is a domestic terrorist.

  • Your maturity level continues to amaze me AA72AA72, I think you're now demonstrating your ability to regress below juvenile to just past the toddler stage.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    Thank again for blocking me on your channel. You really indicated how much of a punk and coward you are. Do these words hurt your butthole and make you cry pumpkin? I like how you treat these Border Patrol agents like they are kids with just a slice of arrogance. I'm guessing you live in Arizona? I'm guessing you are white? No I take it back, you are white, the tone of your douchebag voice gives it away, I apologize.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    Why do you copy and paste your replies too? I get you think I am an authoritative punk that crawled out from under a rock. I'm glad you think by saying you can go fuck yourself is immature. Pretty sure everyone says it. But then again I don't know what your parents did to you. Doesn't take the way you are a cunt, who wants "educate" people on how to defend their constitutional rights by treating Border Patrol as if they are inhumane Nazis.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    If I am indeed under a rock, then I will call the sanitation department personally to let them know you've been living under a porta potty. By now I can smell the shit coming off you so bad through the screen and it is only going to get worse. I know you don't believe in science either, but hopefully scientists get a copy of your DNA so they can clone you. Then you can literally go fuck yourself. You're welcome.

  • @AA72AA72

    Its clear you where brutally and repeatedly abused by your father as a child, probably still to this day too thats why your so mad on here LOL you fucking cock munching brain dead pedophile ! how does it feel as your fag dad impales you on his cock ? You fucking weirdo

  • @ExecutionerThe

    Why are you obsessed with me? Take the dick out of your mouth, take the wedged so firmly up your ass and lighten up. Like this video so much then go suck sanderson1611's dick too, you can be butt buddies. If you have something to say about the video then say it, if not stop being a cunt. What's that noise? Oh ya it's your mom still getting fucked. But again you don't want to stop it, you'd rather spend your time here. Execute my nuts bitch!

  • @ExecutionerThe

    I accept you putting up the white flag. You have more important things to attend to like your mom getting raped while you troll on youtube referring to Border Patrol and Customs agents as Nazis. By the way don't kill yourself, just cause you are worthless piece of shit and possibly a domestic terrorist, doesn't mean you have any right ending your life. I support your right to be a dumbass.

  • @AA72AA72

    White flag to what ? A retard like yourself who spends his days on youtube trying to troll over people LOL Your a pathetic sad individual with no path in life. I suggest you get out of the house and find yourself a job, or even a girlfriend and stop living in your moms basement downloading gay porn and being a youtube hero all day

  • @CheckpointUSA

    Sucks when you start a fight you can't win doesn't it? I accept you putting up the white flag and crawling back to your hell hole you live in. Just remember I fully support you exercising your 4th amendment rights at unlawful Border Patrol checkpoints. However, if you are comfortable with every Border Patrol and Customs agents referring to you as "Here comes that douchebag" , then more power to you.

  • White flag? I don't think so AA72AA72. It's just obvious that you have nothing worthy of consideration to say. Your only use is as a great example of the mindset of people who love seizing people absent suspicion inside the country to investigate them for unknown crimes.

    Tell you what though, if you want to show me how tough you really are then by all means get yourself positioned to work the primary stop location of the next checkpoint I go through.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    By the way this is not your video as you screamingly tell me time and time again. I KNOW, but sanderson1611's is SO FAR up you ass it might as well be. Hurts doesn't it (literally) you piece of shit. By the way this is the second time you have called me and adolescent punk, I will buy you a thesaurus along with tampons to stop your period blood from running all over youtube. You still don't get it because you've never had a girlfriend. Please don't kill yourself :)

  • @CheckpointUSA

    I guess I have to respond to your comments here since you are too chickenshit to reply to me in personal messages, you want everyone to see just how big of a cunt you really are. Don't ever start a war of words you can't win dumbfuck. Well my little bitch (flaming dragon) keep trying to fuck with me and see where this goes. Indeed I will massace you...I WILL FUCK YOU UP!!!

  • You may want to wipe that spittle off the side of your face AA72AA72. If it drips down onto your keyboard, it could short circuit your entire computer & then how would you be able to continue making my point for me regarding why foul-mouthed authoritarian punks should never be empowered with the authority to seize people absent suspicion along highways inside the United States.

    Flame away AA72AA72. I couldn't possibly ask for a better example then you regarding the issue at hand.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    You haven't heard my comments in an hour? I think it's been 5 days now since I've since I've responded to shit flying out of your mouth. But great job being johnny on the spot replying. I guess when you don't have a choice when all you do is troll youtube all day when you're not editing your own videos. What do you do for a living? No making youtube videos then editing them in your mom's basement does not count.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    So why did you block me from your videos faggot on your channel? Did my words rape you and your feelings get hurt. What kind a coward posts a video then runs and hides from criticism. So considering you want respond your own channel you use this channel as a third party for your bullshit? Fuck you, fuck your mother, fuck your family and hope swallow a knife. Violent?  Happens to be freedom of speech you uphold in your videos. Karma's a bitch huh motherfucker

  • @AA72AA72: I have found that CheckpointUSA usually bans people when their comments are only filled with vulgarities, insults, and threats.

  • I don't run from criticism as my comments should make clear AA72AA72, I just choose not to allow foul-mouthed authoritarian punks like you who are incapable of making a well reasoned point, or any point worthy of consideration for that matter, from clogging up my channel.

    Thanks also for demonstrating your inability to understand what freedom of speech is really all about.

  • @AA72AA72

    Where you raped as a child by your father ?

  • @ExecutionerThe

    No but don't waste your time on me because your mom is getting raped as we speak. She's crying for help but your on youtube trolling like a dipshit so she'll probably die of internal bleeding. Hurts, doesn't it fuckface?

  • @prsxefod

    Respect? Why should he respect someone who is continuing a seizure without the lawful requirements established by Law? Cowards follow even the most unreasonable Request. The citizen in the video held his ground, he refused to coward down to their attempts at intimidation. An American who doesn't stand for his Rights... is truly pathetic!

  • Awesome,you did it Steve!You won!God bless you,and God Bless America!

  • this guy did more for liberty in this country than i can think of any soldier in the wars going on right now...

  • nice job men!! thank you!! if we were all like you every thing would be better

  • He was asking for trouble . The times have changed .. Though I support te second amendment

  • @Jay609Bro

    How about the 4th? He was asking to be let go on his way, and without probable cause to continue the detention... he should have.

  • This guy is a fuckin idiot

  • @AA72AA72: If you're a cop, you're dirty to the badge. Either way, that attitude is what gets good cops killed. You make me sick, and if I knew you personally I would say that to your face.

    I would rather work the rest of my days cleaning out latrines than to have to face my family knowing I'm the kind of turd peanut who would work a checkpoint.

    Thanks for making a worthwhile contribution to the below 100 initiative, you fucking un-American cock-knob.

  • All that is wanted to know is you are hauling anything illegal and if you have your proper documentation. Maybe you look Canadian and are traveling with out your propped documents. Get a life.

  • @zapatainc123: Agents do not have the authority to require a person to produce documentation at this type of checkpoint.

  • @dirtbikewoo fuck you fuckin piece of white trash

  • yoyo762 your a fucking idiot.. they are trying to keep out illegal mexicans like your beaner ass.. fuckin piece of shit.

  • i think he just wants to go free on his way!

  • @sfinkter42 Hey F*ck himself at the checkpoint and should just listen

  • Yes his speech is douchey, but that speech is protected by the 1st Amendment. He's fighting the laws that are on a slippery slope. Where does it end? First it's 75 miles from the border. Next year it's 200 miles. Then 200 miles from ANY port of entry in the U.S., including harbors and International Airports. So before you know it, we have Federal Border checkpoints in every state. Then reasonable suspicion is that you are driving a car. Everybody is then guilty until proven innocent.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • sanderson611 & CheckpointUSA = Faggot anti-USA

    Consider yourself butt buddies joined together at the dick and ass. You want defend him CheckpointUSA so stand up for your man once he's done fucking you.

  • @Faggot anti-USA

    Do this same exact shit at a DUI checkpoint faggot. Hopefully you're sober of course, but you've proved you're a selfish prick with no concern for anyone around you, so drinking and driving doesn't seem that unlikely for you. Don't roll down your window, refuse to answer if you've been drinking, and ask if you are being detained like the 100 times you did here on suspicion of DUI. See if they don't drag your ass away in handcuffs. Put that video up on youtube. I DARE YOU

  • Golly AA72AA72, you have me in a tight spot now. Whatever you do, please don't double dog dare me....BTW, what do you have against faggots? Didn't you know that sticks have feelings too?

    I've got to say, the maturity level you display in your comments is truly a wonder. Thanks for being a spokesperson for all those who approve of suspicionless checkpoints inside the country. With comments like yours, I really don't need to say a thing.

  • @Faggot anti-USA

    Oh ya and what I said, you don't know me, I'm just typing words using my freedom of speech. So for you to judge based on what you read makes you an authoritative punk. However, you fuckface presented yourself LOUD and CLEAR in your little video. You woke up with a plan saying I'm gonna be a jackass today, yes that's what I wanna do, I wanna hold up an interstate for half an hour, and waste taxpayers' money.

  • Like I said before, this isn't my video. Since you've now left several juvenile comments on one of my videos, you've probably finally figured that out but not before making it clear you have no restraint, no well thought out argument and no clue. You're great at childish rants though which seems to be the best authoritarians like you can muster when faced with individuals peacefully & lawfully exercising their rights while being seized absent suspicion.

  • @Faggot anti-USA

    Really? I should be ashamed. You decided to put this video up, and decided to name yourself CheckpointUSA. You're a complete selfish egotistical prick who does these videos to try and prove a point of defending your 4th amendment right at a checkpoint. Of course it is your right, but it doesn't mean you are not a complete asshole and douchebag. You have to stop, however 1 out of a million cars do what you do.

  • That's right, you should be ashamed AA72AA72. You can't even get basic facts straight such as who published this video. Hint - it's not mine & it wasn't me. Nonetheless, your anti-American rant against individuals who peacefully & lawfully exercise their rights while being illegally detained by Border Patrol agents not patrolling the border has been duly noted.

  • this dude has balls.....i don't thinks it's so much that his rights are being violated, i think it's just pride in his part and also in the border.

  • WAR SANDERSON1611 ! ! ! awesome job

  • this motherfucker is obviously high and is acting like he's hiding something

  • People who defend these border patrol guys are just uninformed. Certainly, the border patrol agents have been brainwashed to violate our rights, and they're just doing their jobs. But the tendency to get on a power trip also factors in. The driver asked again and again what it was that caused them suspicion, and they had no reasonable answer. The fourth amendment says that you need probable cause for a specific item to be searched for, not just annoyance at an "uncooperative" person. Wake up!

  • I think that's a hard enough job without a clown like that trying to provoke them. And all you guys cheering for that goof, go live in Mexico!

  • Wow! This guy is ignorant. Obviously these checkpoints are lawful, and if you think otherwise, are you saying that you know more about law than the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices? His actions are definitely suspicious and he should been arrested.

  • @RRCoon24 said: "His actions are definitely suspicious and he should been arrested."

    He can't. He didn't do anything illegal.

  • Way to go man, they let you go b/c they checked on what they can and can't do, once they found out they can't do that to you they let you go, fucking pigs, tey have no right, and to be honest, I don't know if Martinez was an American born citizen or not, but if he wasn't he shouldn't be asking anyone shit in the USA.

  • What the hell, "you have no rights here" these pigs need an ass wipping.

  • you should roll it down just a crack so we can hear =)

  • Let's ll try and guess the occupations of the 800 plus viewers here, who obviously hate informed, sovereign citizens ot the U.S., who flex and then if necessary, exercise their constitutional rights, upon being harrassed by badged bullies under "color of law"...

    I'm gonna guess closet nazi first, whatever pays the bills next, and if it comes with a neat-o black costume, and gun, so much the better

    To these haters I say:

    WE the PEOPLE still rule here in America. Don't like it? Then GTFO!

  • You think you have the right to refuse going to secondary because you are not at the border port of entry. They are not concerned with you not being a U.S. Citizen, you are acting like you have something to hide, therefore that is suspicious, therefore they have probable cause you dumb fucking piece of shit. If you are a firefighter I hope you literally die slowly and painfully burning to death with 3rd degree burns and last thing you see is your flesh melting melting away off your bones.

  • @AA72AA72

    1, Drug checkpoints are unlawful(SCOTUS: City of Indianapolis v. Edmond)

    2, Any further detention must be base on consent or Probable Cause

    3, These are in fact limited immigration CPs

    4, Not rolling down a window or answering investigatory questions are grounds for PC.

    5, Referrals are made for the sole purpose of conducting a routine and limited inquiry into residence status that cannot feasibly be made of every motorist where the traffic is heavy.~ U.S v.Martinez-Fuerte

  • You're quite the foul-mouthed ignorant authoritarian punk with fantasies of violence I see AA72AA72. You really ought to be ashamed of yourself for wishing such violent thoughts on someone merely for peacefully exercising the very rights these agents have an obligation to honor & defend.

    I do thank you however for allowing us a glimpse into the mind of someone who supports the suspicionless seizure of others absent suspicion inside the country.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    It's really funny when a conservative Christian tries to trash talk. Let me make it clear to you fuckface, you are as anti-American as Al Qaeda. You have no respect for the Department of Homeland of Security and these brave men and women who protect your right and freedom to be a selfish callous dipshit. You know they are required by law to ask if you are a U.S. citizen? Seems you don't want to answer yes even though you are. Not proud motherfucker?

  • Crawled back out from whatever rock you were hiding under I see AA72AA72. You also must have smashed your head against that rock several times because you're obviously still confused about who's video this is, who I am & what the difference between protecting versus investigating someone is.

    Not that I'm surprised. Most foul-mouthed anti-American authoritarian punks like yourself are easily confused with facts & details.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    Sorry if I don't respond to you within 24 hours of your period. I actually have a life, a career, and don't spend my time fucking with BP to "make a point". Again you probably don't get that joke so if you give me your address I will send you tampax to calm you down. Let me make this perfectly clear, you like sanderson1611's videos right? So keep on sucking his dick

  • Where have I ever indicated any concern whatsoever over how often you comment AA72AA72? When I haven't heard any of your rants for an hour or so, I just presume you''ve crawled back under whatever rock it is that you crawl out of to vomit your hatred for individual rights & the principles this country used to stand for over the network.

  • @CheckpointUSA

    You responded telling me this wasn't your video. Let me explain the JOKE to you. You support sanderson1611 right? Since you two are similar in nature and go out doing these videos, you are now a couple. So change both your screen names to "Faggot anti-USA". You are joined together, dick to butthole. Still don't get it? And for your ten handjob thumbs up, go check out his videos where snapshots the officers and their names to make them targets for cartels.

  • Oh I get it AA72AA72. You're so immature & so unsure of your sexuality that like a 13 year old adolescent punk, the only thing you're capable of doing here is leave vulgar comments about individuals you disagree with but are incapable of intelligently debating.

    Do your parent know you've been using their youtube account again without their permission?

  • @CheckpointUSA

    See I already know ten times about you than you know about me. I watched your videos,  you are a depressed late 20's early 30's guy with no woman so you spend your time making videos about constitutional rights at border patrol checkpoints. You even give yourself a name of "CheckpointUSA".

  • @CheckpointUSA

    And by the way I have no problem with gay people. People have the right to their sexual preferences in their own home. A faggot (YOU) is a self-centered asshole that no regard for others - See South Park: "The F Word" - Season 13 Episode 12. People like you are needy for attention they actually wake up in the morning deciding to be dicks. Where do you work so I can come harass you? Quoting Cartman: "Just wanted to let you know, you're fucking fags."

  • No I understand AA72AA72. You get your understanding of the world through animated stick figures on television. No wonder you act like an adolescent punk without a clue. Thanks for clarifying.

  • They have checkpoints to catch not so much immigrants but DRUGS and WEAPONS from making their way into the United States that were not caught at the point of entry. They never would have searched your vehicle if you rolled down your window and answered the simple question "Are you a U.S. citizen?". By not rolling down your window and demanding to go on your way they have no choice but to conclude based on your behavior that you are hiding drugs or weapons in your vehicle. STOP BEING A CUNT!

  • Thanks for clarifying AA72AA72. No we know for sure that these internal immigration checkpoints are really a ruse for conducting general law enforcement checkpoints ruled illegal by the U.S. Supreme Court in City of Indianapolis V Edmond. Does that make you a supporter of criminal activity by supporting criminal operations like this?

  • You are a fucking idiot sanderson1611. Are you really upset with border patrol stopping you for five seconds. They ask "Are you a U.S. citizen?" You say yes, you're on your way. You know why they have checkpoints. Of course they don't have a right to search you or your vehicle without probable cause. However, you acting like a fucking asshole and a little whining bitch shows you are acting suspicious and THEREFORE they can detain you.

  • @AA72AA72 said: "THEREFORE they can detain you"

    Not according to the law.

  • @AA72AA72 Go back to sleep, compute conform comply, your a good royal subject for being so subserviant

  • Comment removed

  • Holy shit this guy has balls

  • @xXhindukidY LOL...THIS MAN MAKES ME PROUD!!! I SUPPORT HIM ALL THE WAY.

  • "With respect to the checkpoint involved in No 74-1560, it is constitutional to refer motorists selectively to a secondary inspection area for limited inquiry on the basis of criteria that would not sustain a roving patrol stop, since the intrusion is sufficiently minimal that no particularized reason need exist to justify it. Pp. 428 U. S. 563-564." The guy was acting suspicious, and wasn't cooperating at all. All the agents need is reasonable suspicion to push him to secondary.

  • @ff217jarvis: Yup, but only for 'brief questioning'. I notice that nothing you quoted here supports your earlier guess that agents are allowed to search "on a level of suspicion less than probable cause".

    It's good to see that erroneous information being debunked.

  • @ff217jarvis It's not reasonable suspicion when the government agent creates the exigency himself. These agents are wrong. They can't spin a guy up then say that his agitated state is reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.

  • Okay, so time and time again they told you that if you just answered the questions and acted civilized that they would let you go, but you'd rather sit there and have a pissing match with them? Under Terry Vs Ohio law enforcement officers are permitted to conduct a limited warrant less search on a level of suspicion less than probable cause. So they did have the right to detain you and search you. Learn your laws retard!

  • @ff217jarvis: The Supreme Court disagrees with you:

    CITE: "...Border Patrol's routine stopping... for brief questioning of the vehicle's occupants... any further detention or search must be based on [the greater showing of] consent or probable cause"

    SOURCE: United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976)

    About all agents can do here is ask questions and look in the windows. About all I have to do, is stop.

  • @ff217jarvis I would be careful who you start calling "retard". What is the CLEARLY ARTICULABLE reasonable suspicion (which was the Terry standard, and which is still the standard).

    There have been exactly zero courts that have upheld "uncooperative" as reasonable ARTICULABLE suspicion for a Terry Stop.

  • You little creepy bastard, I hope and pray you have fucked luck in your life....you are just a piece of shit....jerk!!!!

  • It is their right to search you for suspicion that is the right they have they dont need a warrent if you are being suspiciouse

  • you should get an attorney and sue for wrongful arrest. the victim of a wrongful arrest case in FL that lasted ~30min was awarded over $1.2M

  • This driver is a major DØÛĆHË-BÃG. 

  • Which state is this ?

  • @TheSmoshrules" New Mexico. Read the title.

    It's a federal checkpoint, though.

  • Righteous!

  • this guy is an idiot.... just let the agents do their job instead of trying to prove a stupid point...how hard is it to roll down the window??? dumbass.

  • Comment removed

  • It isn't hard at all selaromragde but why should someone roll down their window for some random gov'tthug who has seized them absent suspicion along a public highway no where near the border they're paid to patrol? What 3rd world country do you think this is anyway?

    BTW, acknowledging, respecting & protecting the rights of the people they seize absent suspicion IS part of their job. Of course if they had respect for such rights, they wouldn't be doing that job to begin with.

  • @selaromragde This guy clearly lives a principled life, has the courage to stand up to authority, and has the ability to demand his rights under the Constitution in a rather mature manner. What I heard, and witnessed, was someone who put principle first, himself second. It is precisely the action taken by him that will keep this country free; your response is exactly what is helping destroy this country. Your response speaks volumes on your principled life.

  • loser agent: Did you get this idea from checkpoint USA?

    citizen: NO! I got this idea from the founding fathers.

  • haha I love it. Keep up the good work.

  • You are an absolute idiot, dear sir. If I were one of the officers, I would have arrested you in no more than 3 minutes.

  • @SirijusS: Arrested for what? He wasn't violating any laws here.

  • @Pafoofnik1 he wasn't complying with legal orders from an officer

  • @SirijusS: Time stamp, please, so I can see what lawful order you are speaking of.

    Remember, about the only thing agents can do at this type of stop, is ask questions, and look for plain view violations of the law.

  • @Pafoofnik1 I won't give you a time stamp, but they were asking him to pull in for a secondary inspection. Not complying should give them sufficient evidence to suspect that he's hiding something illegal

  • Doesn't really matter what they suspect SirijusS, they need consent or probable cause to extend a detention at this checkpoints. So says SCOTUS:

    U.S. v Martinez-Fuerte (1976): "...We have held that checkpoint searches are constitutional only if justified by consent or probable cause to search....And our holding today is limited to the type of stops described in this opinion. -'[A]ny further detention...must be based on consent or probable cause.' (U.S. vs. Brignoni-Ponce)"

  • @SirijusS How were those orders "legal"? No one in any of these posts have ARTICULATED what either the probable cause, or the reasonable suspicion, for the stop would have been. They had no legal cause to detain him.

  • @SirijusS did you not see the video of this gentleman criminal case with these border patrol agents for the very thing you mentioned. his lawyers destroyed the agents and made each one look like a fool just like you're making your self look by trying to discredit this man. how does the dog determine immigration status? drug check points are illegal in the U.S.

  • @cholo2les They deserve to be sentenced for unlawful detention and the victims should end up living in their houses. There are a lot of peace officers out here who serve with honor. These douchebags undo the dedicated, humble service of all those who serve honorably.

  • @SirijusS On what charge? Obstructing and delaying them by insisting upon his fourth amendment protections?

  • Ur just a dick...

  • LOL

  • But that is unprovable at this point. Or at least, it's about as provable as what kind of dream I had last night.

    So to say that you know what I dreamt about last night, or to say that you know what the dog was thinking, the handler was thinking, AND you know what kind of odors were (and weren't) in Anderson's vehicle, etc, that's just something I have trouble accepting.

  • original handlers testimony to the contrary. That, Jerry the dog, never actually did what it was specifically trained to do when it alerts. This of course means the original handler was either so incompetent he didn't know what constituted an actual alert or he knowingly fabricated the alert thinking he could argue the same crap you are in order to justify/disguise his falsification if it was ever challenged.

  • So it's quite provable at this point that the dog never alerted MrGarky. You see a judge, jury & a court of law made that decision. That's why the trumped up charges against the driver were dismissed not once, but twice.

    I wont even get into the growing body of scientific literature showing dogs are very susceptible to alerting based upon the desires of their handlers, be those desires consciously conveyed through physical signalling of some type or otherwise.

  • The fact that gov't agents are actively undermining the 4th & 5th amendments at suspicionless checkpoints based on little more than an argument equivalent to "the dog ate my homework" is a disgrace & should be laughed out of any court room.

    Tell you what MrGarky. I'll give an alleged dog's 'alert' more credibility when the dog can be directly cross-examined in a court of law & audio & video of the handler & dog actually alerting from 3 different angles is presented as evidence.

  • Also, it's true that there are many more dangerous jobs than law enforcement--but the difference lies in the source of danger.

    Even if I take for granted that roofing, for example, is more dangerous than law enforcement, I'm certain that the danger of roofing does not come from raving lunatics who just want to "go on their way."

    If officers are safer than roofers, it's because they take necessary precautions, to include carrying openly displayed weaponry.

  • Actually, they can search the car without a warrant--there are certain exceptions to the warrant requirement and the car falls under the readily mobile conveyance exception.

    They need probable cause, but no warrant.

    Just saying.

  • @MrGarky: They need the same probable cause needed to bring in front of a judge, who would then decided if a search warrant is justified.

    The only thing the motor vehicle exemption does is move the judges decision from before to after the actual search.

  • @Pafoofnik1 I'm not saying they had probable cause--they didn't. I'm just saying that they do not need a warrant, so to refuse a search based on the fact that they do not have a warrant would be a really bad move.

    In the event that a dog comes out and alerts to the car, the agents would be justified in forcefully extracting you in order to conduct their search. Whether or not you get prosecuted is another story, but if you have any contraband, your car can be seized. It's just not a smart move

  • @MrGarky: So we are in agreement, for the most part.

  • What would be an even less smart move would be for Border Patrol agents to falsify a dog alert in order to compel someone out of their vehicle in order to search without a warrant MrGarky. Something a different set of Border Patrol agents did to the individual in this video.

    Not to mention the fact that more & more evidence is showing dog alerts aren't all they're really cracked up to be. That dogs are actually very susceptible to overt or subtle signals from their handlers.

    Just saying....

  • @CheckpointUSA I heard of the incident that you're talking about, but I don't ever recall seeing any kind of proof that the alert was falsified. Only that Anderson had no contraband in his vehicle.

    I won't argue that dog alerts are sometimes unreliable. But their sense of smell is such that they will pick up odors of contraband from several days prior if there is still residue in the vehicle, in the seats, on clothes, in the ash tray etc. Was this the case? I don't know. Only Anderson knows.

  • No it wasn't the case MrGarky. I've read the agent incident reports & several of the legal filings. There were (2) K9 handlers there that night. The agent handling the dog wrote in his report the dog alerted as the vehicle drove by while entering the checkpoint while the 2nd, more experienced K9 handler, wrote the dog merely 'drafted' in the direction of the vehicle.

    The agents didn't like the fact the driver was videotaping so the handler told the agents at primary to direct to secondary...

  • ...on the basis the dog alerted. The driver challenged the alleged alert but the handler refused to bring the dog over to demonstrate the dog alerting again. Indeed, the handler refused to bring the dog over at the specific request of the AZ DPS agents as well. Why do you suppose the handler would refuse if the initial alert wasn't fabricated & the dog was accurate?

    Anyway, after convincing the AZ DPS to assist with the physical assault & removal of the driver, the vehicle was driven over...

  • ...to secondary where the dog was led around the vehicle - this time while stopped & with no other traffic distractions - and guess what? The dog didn't alert the 2nd time when there were more eyes watching what the handler was doing. Further, a thorough search of the driver's vehicle found, you guessed it, nothing. No dog alert, no illegal contraband.

    At trial, it's my understanding either the 2nd handler or a different agent/officer testified that the dog never alerted despite the...

  • @CheckpointUSA I thought the dog handler " clarified " his story with the response of " the dog almost alerted" . He tried to walk in the grey area of " it could have been " type of explanation .

  • Does it matter what the dog handler tried to claim after the fact yoyo762? The agents/officers illegally extended the detention, physically assaulted the driver, falsely arrested the driver, illegally searched his vehicle and maliciously prosecuted him on the basis that they had probable cause from a dog alert. A dog alert that never actually took place.

  • @CheckpointUSA You miss my point.

    When push came to shove in a court of law, the dog handler saved his own reputation and integrity ( sort of ) by admitting that he did not quite have a dog alert. In that way, he threw the other agents under the bus by not sacrificing himself and his credibility to help his fellow agents legality claim. What he did was hang his law brothers out to dry. He basically said they did not have a dog alert and what actions they took were illegal.

  • I think I see the confusion yoyo762. There were two dog handlers and only one dog. The dog handler who was actually handling the dog was the one who claimed throughout that the dog alerted. It was the second dog handler who was present but not handling the dog who wrote in his initial report and maintained throughout that the dog never alerted. The second handler is to be commended for reporting what actually happened while the first handler should be sitting in a jail cell right now.

  • The guy posting this video is an idiot

  • A PASTOR GOING AGAINST GODS OWN WORD..............

    "Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities,

    for there is no authority except that which God has established.

    The authorities that exist have been established by God."

    Romans 13:1 (NIV

  • i wish you would come through my checkpoint in the hood you would be in handcuffs so quick your head would spin

  • Then you'd be guilty of any number of crimes jd3938.

  • "Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities,

    for there is no authority except that which God has established.

    The authorities that exist have been established by God."

    Romans 13:1 (NIV)

    baptist pastor read gods word about authority above...your a hypocrite....get a life you need to set the example as a pastor..

    ------------------------------­------------------------------­--------------------

  • the real hero is the law enforcement agent putting his life on the line everyday to protect our borders and within ....

  • Actually, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, law enforcement jobs aren't even in the top 10 most dangerous jobs in America jd3938. That honor goes to those who put their life on the line to fish, roof, ranch, drive, etc for a living. You really should learn to put things in perspective & stop trying to make it seem like it's perfectly respectable for gov't agents to trample on the rights of those you claim they're trying to protect.

  • @CheckpointUSA That is so true. There are many far more dangerous jobs.