Zoom-Pan video of human and chimpanzee chromosome 1 to 9.

[rubbercraft]

@truthiscool That is, if the documents are cut in the same segments, arranged in the same paragraphs, and sentences, HEREDITY and INHERITANCE rule, in kind from kind. Bread processing systems have nothing to do with this. YOU DIDN'T HEAR the video. We recieved fused chromosomes from the chimp code, showing the docuement appendix merger, in chromosome 2. If not, just because my DNA resembles my so-called parents, means nothing too, NO KIND FROM KIND!? HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE, as you say???

[rubbercraft]

@truthiscool It is based on the fact that DNA is a document representing the organism. And the document is passed from organism to organism, in kind from kind. The more times the document is passed, the more it changes, with alterations like "the telpehone game". If two documents are different like mouse and man, they are distantly related. If two documents are close like human and chimp, they are related through heredity. If they are vertually identical like father son, they are family.

[mkl62]

Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are lies and should not be allowed in God-fearing Christian homes. Proverbs 6:16-19 is proof.

[sabertooth1980]

Strike that. This is your vid. Awesome job. Keep it up.

[rubbercraft]

Well, if chimpanzee typed in nkjnkjknn-message, then that's too much monkey business to decode. Humans do IT because of fuc,king monkies ruin IT. The Beatles and The Flies, they will dine on your Kenite corrupted IntelTech remains. UR N smurt enff 2 reed. "XnTGA9dZP3dVgr%tu*inbRczLpQhb­b#39sBmZHY" ... Hamlet encode space #3,910,274,482,981,824.

[RyuDarragh]

Exactly as expected in a case where the two species share a common ancestor. What surprises me is how often the Creationists say "Humans did not evolve from chimps!" - to which one replies "That's right." Silly, isn;t it?

[rubbercraft]

Well, if humans once had influence, in a fanciful way, with a monolith, or Hob's End character as in [Quartermass and The Pit], we could definitely be derived as a creation by that "system". But the fact they never teach anything close to this across the churches, does make for silliness in lacking Revelation, from a belief that has a book called Revelation.

Their own Kind from Kind teaching, in the face of massive correlated system data order, is hard to ignore, if the data is True.

[RyuDarragh]

@rubbercraft:Revelations is a "book" about the end of the whole fantasy as told through a drug induced halleucination (don't know how else to describe it...). The real problem, as thunderf00t, aaron ra and others have more eloquently put it, is that "kind" is a useless word to delineate taxona, and even the Linnaen system is sort of obsolete for being too subjective.

[rubbercraft]

I know how else to describe it, maybe a drug induced reading of their own DNA systems as best as humans can read their own code interacting with that chemical sense enhancing system? The oldest highest technology form of DNA reading of collective consciousness DNA?

[rubbercraft]

The odd part is, I found for a large sub-section of one of the chromosomes, I had to massage the data with an ACGT affine transform, because the ACGT were systematically rearranged between them. Either it is a section of DNA with a "dual boot mode" DNA machinery self-alteration ability, or a large patch of ENTREZ data that was systematically read out wrong between the humans and chimp. Every other section of chromosome in the video was raw from ENTREZ, indicating ACGT conservation over time.

[RyuDarragh]

@rubbercraft: I'd put some of that down to the fact that our chromosomes (all animal life) undergo gene swapping between homologous alleles. As errors creep in, some alleles have a different number of base pairs than others. No two humans will have exactly the same number of base pairs on a given chromosome, so 5 million years of divergence will likely result in shifts like that.

[rubbercraft]

I disagree. RNA world could have led to dual boot mode DNA codes, as well as the traditional single-mode DNA. The sections are compact, and greatly transformed. If it doesn't exist to science, it should exist to design.

[rubbercraft]

Or it could have been a section of DNA that can simply be used two different ways, equally well, and some time in history, DNA machinery can systematically flip the data, by that affine relationship,and still work.

Definitely the second most peculiar fact about this first 9 chromosomes data.

The first being, the black sections that may be due to analog bio-chemical system interaction with the DNA reading machine process. The port where DNA actively interacts most strongly with the world.

[RyuDarragh]

@rubbercraft: The black sections were likely errors in the DNA reading machiney as that's still somewhat primative. Nanopore DNA Readout Chip technology coming along will simplify and make much, much faster the entire process. They use a nanopore on a multilayer substrate that is thin enough to read the resistive differences in a single base pair and pull the DNA through electrically. Sort of an artificial transcription molecule analogue.

[rubbercraft]

Disagreed. The black section "are likely" DNA catalytic interaction zones with digital-analog machinery. Living hot-spots of combinatorial catalytic chemistry left over from RNA world to DNA world, potential. Zones of live strong interaction, as much as the human immune system. The "brains" of DNA, that machines can only see living codes that never repeat. PCR reading is PCR reading, otherwise for all other non-interactive DNA code sequence. It ought be investigated for the importance.

[rubbercraft]

It should be noted, after the affine transform of the altered ACGT sub-section of one of these chromosomes was transformed, it made a wonderful match between the species, like the americas fit europe-africa, in the atlantic.

[rubbercraft]

It still seems God so loved the World, he made Man in Ape's image, to horribly botch [The Planet of the Apes]!

[Alphasys]

Maybe think about graphically subtracting one picture from the other, highlighting the amount of changes between them.

[Takudragon]

you need to put up some of that dragon stuff ya did too! any good vids yet??

[middlekk]

Interesting, but you would have made a much stronger case by placing another comparator animal in the mix.

Just a suggestion.

Are you going to go into finer detail? Position of homeobox genes, for example?

And, of course, inquiring minds want to know where the important differences are. After all, we aren't chimps, so what's different between the two species?

[rubbercraft]

Agreed, it would be helpful to compare inter genus chromosome differences like between the primates including humans and, say, a mouse or rabbit, visually. I may download mouse or rabbit chromosomes from NCBI. Though to show how they are different is much harder to do than to show similarities, as entire segments of code are potentially transposed, chromosome to chromosome transferred, and otherwise missing. So a real jigsaw puzzle is invloved comparing humans to rabbits.

[rubbercraft]

Also, it is difficult to go into finer details. For my comparison only photoshop was required to display architecture and matches on a vertical resolution of 10,000:1. To go to base pair comparisons would require special software to compare the fine grained base pair data, and show conserved & near conserved gene sequences, which I would have to write in C & let run for many days to compare the genes. Other's videos have compared such genes, e.g. hemoglobin, homebox, etc.

[rubbercraft]

For experts with background information, like you allude to, the videos should stand on their own to show this aspect of chomosome similarity on their own, and differences with other genus' can be researched, and similarities in marker genes is in others' videos. But I may make some of those videos, you suggest, to bolster my video text description that "merely states" how other genus of animals and plants are so architecturally different. Thank you for the new video ideas.