Darwin's The Origin of Species is still faith based after 160 years.
Matter is not creative. Intelligence is. Atheists have children believing it's scientific to trust that matter is creative, and that it created nature and human intelligence itself.
Atheists have children believing they have no soul, they are animals, and that life was never intended. Atheism enables child hopelessness and child suicide.
I hate that NOMA shit. Other ways of knowing. Can potentially test whether or not something is designed. Not necessarily 100% certainty (which isn't needed), but more so to the point, it is the people making the claim's job to bring forth evidence. Really shitty that christianity and the like get a free sop to be labeled as a way of "knowing". If their magic man interacts with nature, that means something can be tested. Plus considering how vast nature is, what qualifies as supernatural?
@anubis502502 Excellent stuff. I thoroughly enjoyed this, and I am delighted that I now know of their website. My point was that most people who would normally have contrary viewpoints would find it difficult to post coments that are believable after such an intelligent person presented this information.
This has been flagged as spam show
Darwin's The Origin of Species is still faith based after 160 years.
Matter is not creative. Intelligence is. Atheists have children believing it's scientific to trust that matter is creative, and that it created nature and human intelligence itself.
Atheists have children believing they have no soul, they are animals, and that life was never intended. Atheism enables child hopelessness and child suicide.
lughcious 1 month ago
*nods* Science has limits, and God is beyond them. Better then to ignore Him in a classroom or lab.
Xbalanque84 4 months ago
What will Creation "Science" = Intelligent Design evolve into next? Any guesses?
Maybe a "Godzilla did it" book for the kiddies?
ndrthrdr1 6 months ago
@ndrthrdr1 shut the fuck up. didn't you hear the lady? she said creation science is secular science.
OldaurGold 2 months ago
@OldaurGold What video did you watch, and what are you smoking?
ndrthrdr1 2 months ago
I hate that NOMA shit. Other ways of knowing. Can potentially test whether or not something is designed. Not necessarily 100% certainty (which isn't needed), but more so to the point, it is the people making the claim's job to bring forth evidence. Really shitty that christianity and the like get a free sop to be labeled as a way of "knowing". If their magic man interacts with nature, that means something can be tested. Plus considering how vast nature is, what qualifies as supernatural?
mistereveready 8 months ago
Gee, no one has commented on this.
friedie1jeff 1 year ago
@friedie1jeff Nope.
Good stuff though.
anubis502502 1 year ago
@anubis502502 Excellent stuff. I thoroughly enjoyed this, and I am delighted that I now know of their website. My point was that most people who would normally have contrary viewpoints would find it difficult to post coments that are believable after such an intelligent person presented this information.
friedie1jeff 1 year ago 2