Saddam denied having WMD's he was not keeping a secret, also Iraq invaded iran(with US backing may i add) not the other way round. although Iran did launch a counter attack over the Iraqi border. How can international politics be littered with factual errors? the information is all there, surely the international community is not that stupid
George Piro is an amazing interrogator. Sometimes bedroom eyes are more lethal than torture racks. This man's charm is incredible, not even a dictator could resist apparently.
God Bless George Piro, an Assyrian warrior!!! We need more successful, intellectual leaders like you in the States' Federal agencies. I know most interrogators/translators are of Assyrian descent due to their multilingual skills, and I am in awe! Ancient Mesopotamians still creating history!! Wow!
This interview continues with George Piro revealing that Saddam also said he wanted to restart and reconstitute his WMD programs, which he couldn't do as long as Iraq was under sanctions.
SORRY, but I don't believe this guy and I don't believe that our GOVERNMENT based their decision to invade Iraq upon the fact that Iraq definitely possessed WMDs. He's clearly a front man hired by our Government to make our Government sound like we went in with good intentions. BUUUULL SHIIIIT. Our old regime CLEARLY knew Iraq had NO WMD. Besides, what did Iraq have anything to do with 9/11!?!?!? I'll tell you what, NOTHING!!! Get this through your head. Our Government is evil.
@LesiureBoy You really believe the government goes out of their way that much? You stupid, stupid man. They don't care about convincing you otherwise, why would they? What does it matter? They know they won't, and they could do better than this.
Saddam Hussein could have phone the white house telling bush he did not have wmd's that could have been the end of it but he wanted to be the badass so we just did what we had to do and let me say this to all the i hate bush ppl you do know that after 9/11 he was going to start the wmd programs up when the time was right for him and you know no matter who was President it was going to happen it was going to be soon or now so why do all of you want to bitch about it? can anyone tell me?
American spin and rubbish! Question: What is the difference between US Journalism (60 minutes ) and propaganda? Answer: They are two cheeks of the same arse.
"They were moved by Russian Spetsnaz (special forces) units out of uniform, that were specifically sent to Iraq to move the weaponry and eradicate any evidence of its existence," he said.
"The short answer to the question of where the WMD Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon," former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense John A. Shaw told an audience Saturday at a privately sponsored "Intelligence Summit" in Alexandria, Va.
hey y dont u show the rest of the interview idiot saddam also said that he planned on making WMDs but wait saddam with nukes cant possibly be dangerous....sigh
How is he an asshole? Hussein is dead and he freely confessed these things to an American FBI agent. If anything it was pretty clear that it was not under any real disclosure. And besides, this doesn't paint Hussein in a bad light. Actually a good light I would say (humanizing and it doesn't focus on Saddam's atrocities). And as much as I hate Bush and the fact that Bush has done more harm to the world than Saddam he is not a bigger (or a worse I should say) criminal than Saddam.
you are not a smart person and I truly hope you are under 21 years old as an adult cannot be this sheep like (unless you are liberal of course) conservOpunk
Well, according to an earlier 60 Minutes report, most of the "intelligence" that Colin Powell used to make the case at the U.N. came from some Iraqi claiming to have worked at the lab manufacturing WMDs. It turns out the guy wasn't even in Iraq at the time and all his information was false.
Why did we base our whole justification for going to war on the word of some unknown Iraqi?
The Left will attempt to smear Scott Pelley and regrettably, even this upstanding FBI Agent George Piro, who was only doing his job. To all those Bush haters out there, the truth hurts, doesn't it?
lol, we don't have to smear you at all. All we have to do is let you go out and do your thing in public. Then, like this war and everything is you do: you fail...
The truth is we shouldn't have gone to war. Colin Powell said in February of 2001 that Saddam had no significant WMDs. Saddam had no connection to 9/11 or Al Queda. Plus, Dick Cheney said in 1994 that the US would create a quagmire in the region if we took out Saddam.
Most of the chemical and biological weapons Iraq had were sold to him by the US during the Iran-Iraq War. Even if Iraq had WMDs, we did not have cause to start a pre-emptive war.
Explain to me what Iraq had to do with 9/11 and Al Queda. Iraq was not a significant threat and certainly not enough of a threat to enter a pre-emptive war.
Iraq was an issue OUTSIDE of 9/11 and Al Q. I disagree I absolutely think Iraq was a threat to the world and made a video of some reasons why he had to go.
What Saddam did during the Iran-Iraq War and Desert Storm was terrible. He was an egomaniacal dictator and a Stalin wanna-be. Kim Jong Il, Hugo Chavez, and several other dictators are egomaniacal as well. Should we invade those countries as well?
Besides, my point was that Saddam was not a significant military or terrorist threat. If you want to debate countries that are ecological threats, look at the air quality in China.
KimJong and Chavez have not invaded other countries with the intent of annexxing them and when confronted with massive military superiority they refuse to withdraw and instead launch missles at bystander countries and do all the other insane things Hussein did. If they do then yes we should because in my opinion it proves that the worse is yet to come if we don't. Do you think the whole thing with sanctions and no-fly zones and whatnot can just go on forever and ever? There has to be a (cont.)
resolution at some point. Let me ask you this; If your resolution is to just drop it all (sanctions etc,) pull troops and go home and leave Hussein in power do you think Hussein will just sit their twittling his thumbs while his mortal enemy Iran is building nukes? Of course he won't he would do everthing in his power to get a nuke himself and then you would have a PROVEN delusional psychopath with nukes.
When you say he wasn't a threat, to me thats like saying that Charlie Manson isn't a threat because he hasn't killed anyone in 39 years and as he is walking out of prison he has no weapon in his hand so he is not a threat. I don't believe Manson should be let out of prison ever because he has PROVEN to be a delusional psycopath and should be considered a threat till the day he draws his last breath. It doesn't matter that he doesn't have a weapon in his hand right now.
Yes, but we took care of the invasion of Kuwait in 1991. Even Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice said in early 2001 that Saddam were not a threat to their neighbors and did not have significant weapons capabilities. The sanctions and no-fly zones would have been cheaper than the war and we'll likely have a small contigent of troops in Iraq long after the war is over, just like we do in Germany, Japan, and Korea.
This response was before I posted the Manson scenario. I would ask the same question of Rice and Powell. Hussein was made MORE powerful inside the country due to the sanctions. I would ask Rice and Powell is it ok then to sit in that situation with perhaps as many as 50k people a year dying as a result of these sanctions? Thats ok with them? It can just go on forever and ever and when one of Husseins delusional psychopath sons take over it continues on and on?
You said; "Most of the chemical and biological weapons Iraq had were sold to him by the US" This is just patently false the US wasn't even in the top 5. The top 5 are as follows. 1.Singapore 4,515 tons 2.THE NETHERLANDS 4,261 tons 3.Egypt 2,400 tons
Okay, you are correct on that point. My point is that we knew Saddam had at least some weapons of mass destruction because he bought them from the United States.
On Dec. 7, 2002, Iraq sent the United Nations a 12,000-page declaration explaining how its WMD stockpiles had been eliminated. In fall 2002, Hussein's government also allowed teams of U.N. inspectors into Iraq and gave them free rein to examine any site of their choosing.
This is Scott Pelley's historical "lie". He asks Piro questions as if he wasn't previously aware that Saddam had already told the world that he didn't have any WMD's.
These interview is dramatized and Hollywoodized. One thing intervier of Saddam claims that saddam planned to be defient when he went to gallows, that is bullshit and how the hell did he know.
If we are so smart predicting saddam defient death, then why we screwd up the WMD intelegence?
Only thing these does gives some justification in invading Iraq, these is because interviewer makes a point that saddam had plan to continue the WMD program and invation was justified.
aired on CBS
Corporate Bull Shitters.
kaminoneh 1 month ago
fuuny how Saddam said he had no WMDs and ties with al quada months before they attacked.
imnotsickimjustaboy 1 month ago
Saddam denied having WMD's he was not keeping a secret, also Iraq invaded iran(with US backing may i add) not the other way round. although Iran did launch a counter attack over the Iraqi border. How can international politics be littered with factual errors? the information is all there, surely the international community is not that stupid
khizzlah6 2 months ago 2
George Piro is an amazing interrogator. Sometimes bedroom eyes are more lethal than torture racks. This man's charm is incredible, not even a dictator could resist apparently.
tuesdayistnein 4 months ago
wow!!
so confusing??
on one hand, saddam says no WMD's
and on the other hands, SADDAM gassed the KURDS!!
did he have WMD's or not??
so confusing??
ObamaIsAMarxistTowel 8 months ago
George Piro did phenomenally throughout this interrogation process, using his intrinsic cultural intellect, and his multi-linguist skills!
Great Job!
CHICostaRican 9 months ago
George Piro = Assyrian WARRIOR!
God Bless you Piro, and all Assyrians. You guys are continuing to rock the intel world here in the US, and abroad! God Bless!
Love from your Armenian brothers!!!
Manhatten312 9 months ago 4
Comment removed
MrKolowski 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
God Bless George Piro, an Assyrian warrior!!! We need more successful, intellectual leaders like you in the States' Federal agencies. I know most interrogators/translators are of Assyrian descent due to their multilingual skills, and I am in awe! Ancient Mesopotamians still creating history!! Wow!
MrKolowski 10 months ago
Comment removed
CHICostaRican 10 months ago
Sadam confesses that he didn't have WMDs? That's like a serial killer confesses he didn't do it.
To call it a confession implies that you are incriminating yourself. Sadam is declaring his innocence, not confessing to his guilt!
Vulcan750L 11 months ago
This interview continues with George Piro revealing that Saddam also said he wanted to restart and reconstitute his WMD programs, which he couldn't do as long as Iraq was under sanctions.
Re5Publica 1 year ago
SORRY, but I don't believe this guy and I don't believe that our GOVERNMENT based their decision to invade Iraq upon the fact that Iraq definitely possessed WMDs. He's clearly a front man hired by our Government to make our Government sound like we went in with good intentions. BUUUULL SHIIIIT. Our old regime CLEARLY knew Iraq had NO WMD. Besides, what did Iraq have anything to do with 9/11!?!?!? I'll tell you what, NOTHING!!! Get this through your head. Our Government is evil.
LesiureBoy 1 year ago 11
@LesiureBoy
Thank you
no man is free if he choose to keep himself blind,
Thanks for speaking the truth
alsayeghkn 3 months ago
@LesiureBoy You really believe the government goes out of their way that much? You stupid, stupid man. They don't care about convincing you otherwise, why would they? What does it matter? They know they won't, and they could do better than this.
herolink17 1 month ago
@LesiureBoy idiot.
RESTxINxPIECEZ 4 weeks ago
@LesiureBoy Might want to watch this
watch?v=_80OEyDMxKo
standauffish 3 days ago
This is old news. Only liberal nimrods don't know this already.
BlueStateChronicle 1 year ago
The ending was cut off. Saddam states
that he would have started up his WMD
program in the future. Now, what he would
have done with them is unknown.
GlassAgate 2 years ago
Saddam Hussein could have phone the white house telling bush he did not have wmd's that could have been the end of it but he wanted to be the badass so we just did what we had to do and let me say this to all the i hate bush ppl you do know that after 9/11 he was going to start the wmd programs up when the time was right for him and you know no matter who was President it was going to happen it was going to be soon or now so why do all of you want to bitch about it? can anyone tell me?
attie3 2 years ago
Yep, just call him up...kind of like you would order a pizza....
DeBunker7 2 years ago
Fuck Saddam and fuck Mohammed, banging each other up the ass in Hell
K1N6100 2 years ago
fuck u
u cunt
come say it in front of a muslim if ur man enough
u goto to hell with saddam
but dont speak of mohammed pbh
fa3ilkhair 2 years ago
mohammed was a pedophile faggot. Where do you live? I'd love to say that to your sand nigger face.
WeDieYoung1083 1 year ago
@WeDieYoung1083 i hope you and your family dies young.
somxone 1 year ago
@WeDieYoung1083 hahaha good one
GearsofMaverick 1 year ago
@K1N6100 fuck you and fuck your mother you son of a gangbanged mother .
arshiker 1 year ago
Saddam feared Iran and islamists more than the US and the West. He wanted the Iranians to think he had WMD.
aitraining 2 years ago
I took an interrogation training class.. the agent is clearly lying when asked certain ?s
cezoner 2 years ago
Explain!
ASAManifesto 2 years ago
what did you take it over the internet? are you a professional interrogator?
This man interrogated the deposed leader of an innocent country.
Who ahve you interrogated?
rcde4ever 2 years ago
American spin and rubbish! Question: What is the difference between US Journalism (60 minutes ) and propaganda? Answer: They are two cheeks of the same arse.
khghountch 3 years ago
I'M SO PROUD OF MY COUSIN GEORGE!!
biggaymikey 3 years ago
@biggaymikey you and your cousin are fag ,,go fuck a donkey
arshiker 1 year ago
This is great stuff. Never seen it.
aitraining 3 years ago
Im thankful that Saddam cant threaten anyone anymore.
cn01866 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Me too. I invite you to check out my video about it.
TheKuffarKid 3 years ago
"They were moved by Russian Spetsnaz (special forces) units out of uniform, that were specifically sent to Iraq to move the weaponry and eradicate any evidence of its existence," he said.
MatthewJ1978 3 years ago
People who know that they would die usually tell the truth.
subprime2006 3 years ago
Ex-Official: Russia Moved Saddam's WMD
Kenneth R. Timmerman
"The short answer to the question of where the WMD Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon," former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense John A. Shaw told an audience Saturday at a privately sponsored "Intelligence Summit" in Alexandria, Va.
MatthewJ1978 3 years ago
Because its not like Saddam would lie..
Rahavin 3 years ago 2
hey y dont u show the rest of the interview idiot saddam also said that he planned on making WMDs but wait saddam with nukes cant possibly be dangerous....sigh
et01tk 4 years ago
What an asshole. The man trusted him and he betrayed him. And the bigger criminal is still alive in the White House.
mayamimimi 4 years ago 2
How is he an asshole? Hussein is dead and he freely confessed these things to an American FBI agent. If anything it was pretty clear that it was not under any real disclosure. And besides, this doesn't paint Hussein in a bad light. Actually a good light I would say (humanizing and it doesn't focus on Saddam's atrocities). And as much as I hate Bush and the fact that Bush has done more harm to the world than Saddam he is not a bigger (or a worse I should say) criminal than Saddam.
jpbalkenende 4 years ago 2
hey mayamimimi -
you are not a smart person and I truly hope you are under 21 years old as an adult cannot be this sheep like (unless you are liberal of course) conservOpunk
tony6451 3 years ago
This had the ring of Hollywood to it; although Spielberg quality.
Where are the recordings? Why do we have to take someone unknown FBI agents word for all the answers?
dstevens101 4 years ago
Well, according to an earlier 60 Minutes report, most of the "intelligence" that Colin Powell used to make the case at the U.N. came from some Iraqi claiming to have worked at the lab manufacturing WMDs. It turns out the guy wasn't even in Iraq at the time and all his information was false.
Why did we base our whole justification for going to war on the word of some unknown Iraqi?
Jnmcda0 4 years ago
actually, saddam never allowed the inspector open access to his palaces. Nice try.
bodycracker 4 years ago 2
Actually, he allowed them total access: nice try on your part.
theytd 4 years ago
The Left will attempt to smear Scott Pelley and regrettably, even this upstanding FBI Agent George Piro, who was only doing his job. To all those Bush haters out there, the truth hurts, doesn't it?
rhodge06 4 years ago 2
lol, we don't have to smear you at all. All we have to do is let you go out and do your thing in public. Then, like this war and everything is you do: you fail...
theytd 4 years ago
The truth is we shouldn't have gone to war. Colin Powell said in February of 2001 that Saddam had no significant WMDs. Saddam had no connection to 9/11 or Al Queda. Plus, Dick Cheney said in 1994 that the US would create a quagmire in the region if we took out Saddam.
Most of the chemical and biological weapons Iraq had were sold to him by the US during the Iran-Iraq War. Even if Iraq had WMDs, we did not have cause to start a pre-emptive war.
Jnmcda0 4 years ago
Can you get pass the talking points! It makes sense, and it's not complex, so you can't accept it!
arubberball 4 years ago
Explain to me what Iraq had to do with 9/11 and Al Queda. Iraq was not a significant threat and certainly not enough of a threat to enter a pre-emptive war.
Jnmcda0 4 years ago
Iraq was an issue OUTSIDE of 9/11 and Al Q. I disagree I absolutely think Iraq was a threat to the world and made a video of some reasons why he had to go.
TheKuffarKid 3 years ago
What Saddam did during the Iran-Iraq War and Desert Storm was terrible. He was an egomaniacal dictator and a Stalin wanna-be. Kim Jong Il, Hugo Chavez, and several other dictators are egomaniacal as well. Should we invade those countries as well?
Besides, my point was that Saddam was not a significant military or terrorist threat. If you want to debate countries that are ecological threats, look at the air quality in China.
Jnmcda0 3 years ago
KimJong and Chavez have not invaded other countries with the intent of annexxing them and when confronted with massive military superiority they refuse to withdraw and instead launch missles at bystander countries and do all the other insane things Hussein did. If they do then yes we should because in my opinion it proves that the worse is yet to come if we don't. Do you think the whole thing with sanctions and no-fly zones and whatnot can just go on forever and ever? There has to be a (cont.)
TheKuffarKid 3 years ago
resolution at some point. Let me ask you this; If your resolution is to just drop it all (sanctions etc,) pull troops and go home and leave Hussein in power do you think Hussein will just sit their twittling his thumbs while his mortal enemy Iran is building nukes? Of course he won't he would do everthing in his power to get a nuke himself and then you would have a PROVEN delusional psychopath with nukes.
TheKuffarKid 3 years ago
When you say he wasn't a threat, to me thats like saying that Charlie Manson isn't a threat because he hasn't killed anyone in 39 years and as he is walking out of prison he has no weapon in his hand so he is not a threat. I don't believe Manson should be let out of prison ever because he has PROVEN to be a delusional psycopath and should be considered a threat till the day he draws his last breath. It doesn't matter that he doesn't have a weapon in his hand right now.
TheKuffarKid 3 years ago
Yes, but we took care of the invasion of Kuwait in 1991. Even Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice said in early 2001 that Saddam were not a threat to their neighbors and did not have significant weapons capabilities. The sanctions and no-fly zones would have been cheaper than the war and we'll likely have a small contigent of troops in Iraq long after the war is over, just like we do in Germany, Japan, and Korea.
Jnmcda0 3 years ago
This response was before I posted the Manson scenario. I would ask the same question of Rice and Powell. Hussein was made MORE powerful inside the country due to the sanctions. I would ask Rice and Powell is it ok then to sit in that situation with perhaps as many as 50k people a year dying as a result of these sanctions? Thats ok with them? It can just go on forever and ever and when one of Husseins delusional psychopath sons take over it continues on and on?
TheKuffarKid 3 years ago
You said; "Most of the chemical and biological weapons Iraq had were sold to him by the US" This is just patently false the US wasn't even in the top 5. The top 5 are as follows. 1.Singapore 4,515 tons 2.THE NETHERLANDS 4,261 tons 3.Egypt 2,400 tons
4.India 2,343 tons 5. W.GERMANY 1,027 tons.
TheKuffarKid 3 years ago
Okay, you are correct on that point. My point is that we knew Saddam had at least some weapons of mass destruction because he bought them from the United States.
Jnmcda0 3 years ago
Iam not Bush hater. This damn thing is staged. I do not beleave anuy of this.
Understanding Arabic culture and these guy talking, none of these makes sence.
What credibility these would have when we missed a WMD charge and invaded country because Iraq and dsitroyed beyond recognition.
savita1926 4 years ago
CBS has nothing to gain, and everything to lose!
arubberball 4 years ago
On Dec. 7, 2002, Iraq sent the United Nations a 12,000-page declaration explaining how its WMD stockpiles had been eliminated. In fall 2002, Hussein's government also allowed teams of U.N. inspectors into Iraq and gave them free rein to examine any site of their choosing.
This is Scott Pelley's historical "lie". He asks Piro questions as if he wasn't previously aware that Saddam had already told the world that he didn't have any WMD's.
This interview is rubbish!
rascalrich 4 years ago 2
These interview is dramatized and Hollywoodized. One thing intervier of Saddam claims that saddam planned to be defient when he went to gallows, that is bullshit and how the hell did he know.
If we are so smart predicting saddam defient death, then why we screwd up the WMD intelegence?
Only thing these does gives some justification in invading Iraq, these is because interviewer makes a point that saddam had plan to continue the WMD program and invation was justified.
savita1926 4 years ago