oh cmon, these storys are ok once in a while, but you do them to often, it makes me choose to not click on videos because its to fucking stupid of a "news" story
@mecher3k why would you tell anyone that. there is a person behind the comment who has a right to his own opinion no matter how dumb you think he is for it.
@mecher3k no matter how you say it is what you said is highly inappropriate. you have to think about what you say because to you it could be nothing but for who ever you directed it at it could really mean something to them.
I talk to this girl that went to Cornell, IVY League college, and I bring up Ron Paul and what she adds to the conversation is, "He's got some weird eyebrows." I'm looking at her like so, what he is now discredited as a politician? The girl at the same time hadn't trimmed her eyebrows for literally weeks and was like I don't care too much about physical appearance these days. This is why America is in the shape that it's in. The idiocy and hypocrisy.
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
i dont care if he has a fake eye brow and even lied about it! ohhh...lets talk about how fucked up ur face is..on tv!... jesus. they will use ANYTHING to shoot down ron paul on tv i've noticed. he's so ignored and bad mouthed. that amazing head should be on mount rushmore!
Hey you, Mr. Ignorance, how about you take a mere *TWO SECONDS* to Google: "allergy eyebrow loss" before you make snarky, idiotic remarks about a man's *EYEBROWS.*
Honestly, who the hell cares? It's stupid, trivial issues like this that distract people from the truth and his actual *MESSAGE.*
As a side-note, if you had a condition in which your eyebrows were thinning, would you want people to be making fun of you for it?
What the hell are you talking about? This was the most nonsensical "controversy" I have ever seen. What's going on of America right now? Next stop is electing Santorum as president.
Fake eyebrow or not.... he is the rest of the world`s HOPE! USA need to stop acting like fools, every other Presidental Candidate looks like power sick people. Why isn`t there any normal person as Presidental Candidate`s?
@Cheisu7 HA HA HA I love this video, I love seeing the little faggot ass RonBots cry like the little bitches that they are! LOL LOL! Ron Paul's TOUPEE FTW! LOL LOL!
@Cheisu7 Chill out, you idiot. I've watched dozens of these tonight alone, and the vast majority have been on serious issues. So one story happens to be a little fluff piece for humor's sake? What's your problem? Get that stick out of your ass.
@Cheisu7 I doubt they really care, because in other videos they say these issues really are just stupid.
I think they are just talking about it because it's just a funny thing is all, and it makes sense because all politicians to this and make sure they look a certain way since that effects people views of them if they look even a little off on anything.
It's really interesting when you look into it, how those things effect peoples decisions subconsciously.
@Cheisu7 TYT reports on politics, celebrity gossips, news stories, silly news stories, viral videos...they report on a bunch of stuff. So they report on something that doesn't really matter. That doesn't mean they only cover unimportant issues. Don't be a douche about it.
ALL NEOCON GOP & OBAMA ARE THE SAME. They Love Wars & Permanent Detentions, They Love Burning US Constitution, They Love NDAA, SOPA, Patriot Act, FISA & Spying on Americans, They Love Torture, Killing families w/ Drones, Guantanamo & Drug War, They Love Corporate Bailouts & Subsidies, They Love Giving TRILLIONS to Pentagon & War Industry, They Love Zionists, AIPAC & sending Israel TRILLIONS, They Love Fed Reserve and WONT Audit it, They Love Fascism & they ALL take Bribes
Dr Ron Paul= ONLY USA PATRIOT WHO PUTS AMERICA FIRST, ALL OTHERS (GINGRICH, OBAMA, ROMNEY, PERRY, BACHMAN, HUNTSMAN, SANTORUM ARE ONLY LOYAL TO ISRAEL & AIPAC)
Ron= ONLY ONE WHO WONT START A WAR WITH IRAN BASED ON LIES
Ron= ONLY ONE WHO RESPECTS US CONSTITUTION, HATES NDAA & PATRIOT ACT, FIGHTS FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES, WANTS YOU TO HAVE MORE FREEDOM & CHOICE, RON LOVES CAPITALISM (NOT CORPORATISM, NOT TOO BIG TO FAIL, NOT BAILOUTS, NOT SUBSIDIES, NOT FASCISM)
Ron Paul IS THE ONLY Conservative, he is THE ONLY Patriot, and he is THE ONLY Constitutionalist in the Republican Party.
Ron Paul is an Eisenhower-Goldwater-Lincoln Always-Honest America-First Classic True CONSERVATIVE.
All the other Republicans ARE STATISTS, FASCISTS, INSIDER TRADERS AND TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION & USA.
They commit TREASON EVERY DAY by being Slaves to AIPAC, WAR, Fed Reserve, K-Street Moneyed interests who are bent on destroying Capitalism, Competition and Future of America.
As you get older, the outward part of your eyebrow thins out, at times, almost non-existent. He has longer hair in the middle of his eyebrow that is drooping downward away from the middle of his eyebrow. His manager probably meant he had rubbed his eyes due to allergies, which caused his eyebrow to get messed up. It's nothing a little trim wouldn't fix. If this is the type of thing people put importance on, no wonder this country is fcked! Damn, who wants to vote for a Metro-Sexual, anyway?
Don't you guys always fucken complain about the dribble in the media.. And you're talking about Ron Paul's eye brow.. Seriously. Many he had surgery and hair stopped growing who cares! Report on his beliefs you clowns and not his eye brows
@ArcaneCossack , there is absolutely nothing wrong with no eyebrows~;) the man would have my vote if he had no limbs as long as he was still Ron Paul, still knew what he knows, and still stands for what he stands for~ all he is, is a representation of truth~ eyebrows, or no eyebrows~;)
@Moh5Itachi1 , there Are No Real criticisms of Ron Paul~XD so making an observation of stupidity now makes me a cult follower? w0w~ don't worry, I'll leave that observation of stupidity open for someone else~ 0.o RON PAUL 2012~:)
Ron Paul is the ONLY ONE YOU CAN VOTE FOR BECAUSE..
All Other Republicans and Obama ARE THE SAME. They Love Wars and Starting New Wars, They Love Shredding the Constitution, They Love Patriot Act, They Love Corporate Bailouts, They Love Corporate Subsidies, They Love Giving Trillions to the Pentagon and Military Industrial Complex, They Love Zionists, Israel & AIPAC & Sending them TRILLIONS, They Love the Federal Reserve and DO NOT want to Audit it, They Love the Top 1% & they Love to be Bribed.
Top comments: Most libertarians who are subscribed to TYT don't think Obama is a socialist, quite the reverse, they think he is a corporatist working for Goldman Sachs (and the case could be argued successfully).
And as to the video, watch other vids and pictures of Ron Paul from the late 80's, his right brow is slightly different from his left one. It isn't some weird brow wig, it's the way it has always looked. See for yourself. It's genes; people don't have perfectly symmetrical brows.
Its repulsive..... Americans have become such fat-sweaty mongoloids.... they dont care about what Paul says.... they only care about how he looks. Why dont you vote for Kim Kardashian? If your founding fathers were alive they'd have a heart attack. GO PAUL!!!!
There seems to be no end to the nonsense people will talk about. Am I the only one who has seen older men who have really long eyebrow hair and, instead of trimming it, keep it "combed" across the brow? It seems so obvious to me that this is what is going on and the loose part just falls down sometimes when he sweats or something. Eyebrow toupe professional? Please. Most importantly, WHO CARES!!
@shalcall So, why not ONLY REGULATE those who do harm? why do you have an incessant need to regulate everyone for the minority who do bad things? Are you a control freak, or oblivious to the tyranny and bad impacts on the economy you are causing with your blanket Bs regulation in the name of "safety" and other "common goods"?
@shalcall And seatbelts wouldn't be taken out of cars, customers want them. That's like saying air bags would be taken out, or murder would magically be legal without govt...lol. Murder was illegal in anarchist Ireland too you know. Same for any place stateless society existed. Murder and rape and air bags aren't there because the govt forces it, and regulations stufle competition for big companies to monopolize. Do you like monopolies? Or just ignorant to the fact they use regulations? Hmmm.
@shalcall Also that K-12 is of shitty quality if you hadn't noticed...and getting worse every generation.
Your NEED to protect is BS justification for tyranny. Next you'll tell me YOU NEED to extort me on the threat of kidnapping to fund this stuff...oh wait YOU already do. It's called tax on threat of prison. Some protection...more like a protection racket like the Mafia if you ask me. Fuck the collective, indivuals have rights, not collectives.
@shalcall First of all the toxins in the water is called Externality Fallacy, pleaee read "Externality Fallacy: The Failure of the Statist Economic Case". The FDIC is moral hazard that makes banks more likely to go belly-up, logically. What would be preferable is to prosecute and punsih severely harm and fraud, not regulate and legalize fraud (fractional banking, less than 100% deposits, etc.). So it's cute you believe those things protect you, but they don't. That K-12 is brainwashing BTW.
@ProIndividual I'm sorry. I can't take someone seriously who uses the word "statist" as often as you do in your writing. Are you an anarchist? Because then the difference between our thinking is much more fundamental than opinions on resource allocation.
@shalcall Statist is real word, it someone who subscribes to the philsophy that the compulsory state (force) is the best way to organize society. There are two ways to organize society, voluntarily or by violence and threats of violence. I don't take anyone to be moral or intellectual who IS a statist, so I could care less what you taek seriously. You have no morals of worth or philsophy with ethics to speak of. Yes, I am an anarchist..proudly. I reject violence and coercion by you or by proxy.
@ProIndividual Given that you're an anarchist, there is very little that we could agree with when it comes to either government or capitalism (given that even a laissez faire system requires government to enforce property rights).
@shalcall You're using an adhominem...we don't need to agree on anything to debate the issue at hand, which was regulation...if you can't defend your ideas logically and are forced to informal logical fallacies, like ad hominem attacks (attack the opponent personally, not the issue at hand) then you concede the debate. My personal philosophy is not relevant to whether regulating the 100% for negative actions of the 2% (the percentage of sociopaths in society) is beneficial socially/economically.
@ProIndividual I am not attempting to negate the truth or falsity of your claim by stating you're an anarchist. As such, I'm not making an ad hominem argument. I'm simply stating that there is no point in arguing with an anarchist because there are few, if any, axioms about either the economy or the government that we could agree on. We can't argue about the efficiency of gov't intervention if you don't believe in the necessity of gov't. Our disagreements are more fundamental.
@shalcall And BTW, govt is not required to have property rights, you might want to read history. Human beings existed in stateless societies for at least 80% of human history, and nearly all of that time had rights to personal and private property. The state can only infringe upon a right. And don't confuse courts with the state...government is not the state. Voluntary govt is like boxing, the state (compulsory govt) is assault. The difference is night and day. Vol Govt is allowed in anarchism.
@shalcall And since you opened the can of worms of attacking personal philsophies...how is it that you support extortion (tax) on the threat of kidnapping (prison) and think that's a good moral position to hold in life? Do you honestly compromise all moral/ethical integrity out of nostalgia, intellectual laziness in finding alternatives, or in the belief it's immoral to extort on the indivudla level, but when you do it by proxy because you can't figure out how to make it unnecessary, it's okay?
@ProIndividual Where did I attack your personal philosophies? I asked if you were an anarchist. You said yes. I said, then there is no point in arguing about more complex issues. I can't see where I've attacked you. Just because I'm not willing to waste time arguing with someone who fundamentally disagrees (and clearly STRONGLY disagrees) with my basic beliefs doesn't mean I'm attacking you.
@shalcall Quote:" I'm sorry. I can't take someone seriously who uses the word "statist" as often as you do in your writing."
I'm sorry you can't accept me calling a philosophy what it is. I suppose I could call it "evilism", "violencism", or "aggressionism" to make you feel better...but that would be SOPHISM. So, since you tried to discount my argument simply based on my personal beliefs and vernacular, YOU ad hominem'd where you should of debated content. Got it? I accept your concession.
@shalcall The waste of time is even engaging anyone in a debate who does not parrot your worldview...not debating people diametricly opposed to it. See, usuallu in debate, two sides do not share a common belief.
So when you read what I asked you to, then debate the ideas on their merits, not on who said them and what that person believes outside of the subject at hand, then we can have what some folks call a DEBATE. Otherwise, you intellectual wave a white flag by way of logical fallacy.
@shalcall And in case you forgot, before you ad hom'd, the topic was externality being an excuse for blanket regulation, and whether or not it is socially or economically beneficial. You thought it WAS beneficial in at least a social sense, I went about giving something to read that logically explains why it is neither economically nor socially beneficial to regulate in the way you support. The debate should focus on this KEY point, not my philosophy or vernacular. Logic 101, got it? Good.
@ProIndividual My last comment on this topic. I will not waste time arguing with someone about the efficiency of government intervention (and no where did I say externalities excuse blanket government regulation, but thanks for being dishonest) when the person on the opposing side believes that ANY funding of government that is not voluntary is violence. Just like I wouldn't argue with someone about the merits of a particular T.V. show if that person believes that T.V. is the devil incarnate.
@shalcall All of our regulation is blanket. We only regulate pre-emptively...otherwise we'd be doing ONLY regulation of Harm and Fraud; a free market version. So you are for pre-emptive blanket regulation, because all pre-emptive regulation is blanket regulation. Unless you're psychic of course...lol.
Thanks for not even knowing your own position well enough to defend it.
And again, debate the points, not my philsophy..it's logically irrelevant.
@shalcall Your philosophical position (that the state is necessary or even preferable) is an affirmative position. You are saying violence, like tax, is necessary to stop violence (either foreign or domestic), which logically fails on it's premise. My position is not affirmative, it's the default position. My position is no innocent deserves to be forced to do anything violently or on threat of violence (prison is kidnapping for extortion-tax). So, your position needs justifying. Do so, or fail.
@shalcall This philsosophical debate has been going on since the 6th Century BC. The argument on externality being an excuse for regulating pre-emptively (blanket regulation), as opposed to free market "regulation" (it's an unregulated market actually) of only harm and fraud, has been going on since Keynesians came up with externality as an excuse for their interventions. If you refuse to listen to the other side and debate it, we win by default...as we've been doing for decades now. Dogma..yuck
@shalcall I expect you, if a logical human being, to make your argument for addressing externalities, and the benefits socially/economically. I do NOT expect you to make your argument for defending your moral theory (if yopu even have one)...as there is no defense for it. :)
You: We need a monopoly on violence to protect us from initiations of force, foreign and domestic.
@shalcall PLZ excuse my typos, spelling of "philosophy" was purposeful to fit the word limits, others were accidental, such as forgetting articles in sentences. I'm sure my meaning comes through well enough.
Also let me mention, if the topic was resource allocation my philosophy and ethics (anarchism) are irrelevant to the debate, hence why I called it an ad hominem attack. Economics are separate from philosophy. I know many socialist and capitalist anarchists, and statists also.
@shalcall Anytime you feel like addressing the fallacy you presented about externality justifying regulation, let me know. I gave you something to read on the subject, when you can retort it, private message me on here so we can discuss it at length...it doesn't lend itself to character restrictions in the comment section, as you'll see if you bother to read the other point of view instead of swallowing established dogma.
@ProIndividual yes it is and i can prove that in a link if you want me to it is under the 4th amendment the right to privacy but it should be under the 13th slave labor because forcing a women to have a baby isnt just work for free its work for negitive dollars but pricks like you dont give a shit about that you just enjoy women suffering
if you want the links that prove that abortion is in the constitution just let me know
it's pretty sad when you've got to stretch to your conception of his physical appearance just to have something bad to say about the guy~ well... it's great for us Ron Paul supporters... but still sad for everybody else~ ;)e
@schismatic37 It's pretty sad that you think that ppl are using this as any real criticism of Ron Paul rather than just making a joke of it. Srry if we offended you by making a little joke of your cult leader.
holy heck, you've never seen long eyebrows before? allergies acting up=blowing his nose, rubbing his eyes, you know, the kind of stuff real people do~ you must be the type of people who wear pounds of make-up and dream of artificial breast implants~ typical spuds~ time to open the cover of that weird Real Man's book~ maybe you'll learn how to see reality~ ...I doubt it, but none the less, it's still there to find~ 0.o RON PAUL 2012.
It's his real eyebrow dummies. It's been like that for years now. Maybe a scar or injury caused it, idk. Maybe it's the first time people are really looking at him.
@Otzmatron Sigh. Anyone who knows what socialism is would never call Obama or his ideas socialist. People who say that just look so uneducated and ignorant. I'm positive you could neither define socialism in your own words, nor explain how liberals and Obama are socialist. These are the same people who will insist the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
@magenta471 Obama has not been a socialist. He's been useless. If you think he's done anything for you, you are truly beyond redemption. You're watching a channel that says the exact same thing. You're being shafted by both the Republicrats and the Demopublicans. If you want social security, you go ahead and have it, but as a libertarian, I should be able to opt out of this nonsense and take care of myself. Imposing it on me is not liberal and lovely, it is tyrannical and oppressive. Savvy?
@Agentisnoob Wow. Really? So are Sweden, Germany, Canada, Bristian, etc., all socialist countries? Are their citizens socialists? Are their leaders? Again, you have no clue whatsoever what socialism is. I feel like a college education should be mandatory so we don't end up with morons like you. That, or we desperately need to improve our education system.
The guy refuses to wear a tailored suit, or expensive shoes. Do you really think he would wear fake eyebrows? Look at pictures of 4 years ago, it looked exactly the same.
"ooga booga i dunno how dis eyebrow industry be surviving" Not funny... Its not an "Industry" so to speak, or a sub culture. Its just a one off product to give you better physical appearance to appeal to all the shallow morons like these turd slurping turks who are having an autistic fit over a 75 year old mans physical appearance. Absolutely pathetic. Stupid cheap shot liberal idiots.
@JoanBeatrington001 If you would stop foaming at the mouth for a minute over your hatred of liberals you would realize how ironic your statement is for calling us shallow when Ron Paul is the one wearing fake eyebrows. I mean why would someone worry about something like that? I'd never even heard of fake eyebrows until now. You'd have to be extremely vain and shallow to care about that.
I wonder, if Ron Paul was wearing fake eyelashes or fingernails would you just casually ignore that too?
@whythehell99 You're an idiot plain and simple. Arguing over fake eyebrows on a 75 year old man instead of his actual policies on youtube makes you an idiot and id like to think i still have enough integrity to engage in a mindless debate with a liberal faggot over this. Goodbye
He does not accept money from SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS and CORPORATE EILITE AS ROMNEY AND OBAMA AND CAIN DO. THEY TRADE FAVORS!! Ron Paul a true Patriot, Go to his site and donate, buy shirts and signs, donate today!! $2.5+ Million raised by us stupid AMERICANS , at least according to Herman Cain!
@dakoneko I was being sarcastic because TYT are a joke, so left winged its ridiculous. They consider this actual news, and you obviously didnt hear what that retard said at the end.......smh.....
Cenk always asks himself rhetorical questions, and then there's an awkward pause because nobody answers and he stumbles all over himself. That is my favorite part of TYT
If you look at all his campaign pictures on his site and Flickr his right eyebrow is always way thicker than his left one. I think he just naturally has a thicker longer right eyebrow that can be parted or looks funny with certain lighting. My grandpa had a double eyebrow and some long ear hairs that could be mistaken for sideburns. You think you have problems with your nose hair/ear eyebrow hair now wait till you hit 70.
I have been acting professionally since 1965, and have worn many hairpieces. Ron Paul has an excellent hairpiece, almost undetectable. But of you look at a full screen still of him, you'll notice just about his right ear the faint line of the transparent netting. More obvious is the way his right temple has a vertical wrinkle inconsistent with the rest of the skin there--that's the netting pulling virtically just a little. It's beautiful, but it's not real.
The media is trying to dictate us who we need to choose. Propping up Bachmann, then Perry now Cain while simultaneusly propping up Romney blacking out Ron Paul the whole season. Will the people just sit there and take it? Or will they stand up today and say "Black THIS Out!"
The Ron Paul moneybomb is running strong today but it needs your help. Donate what you can to help the free world.
Lol all the Ron paul supporters visited this video and dislike this page. So many of them on the internet. I can't watch a single political video without seeing "Ron Paul 2012" Its getting annoying now.
@shalcall The issue here is about greed and corruption. You're suggesting stricter oversight by the very entity helping to make it possible for insurance companies to operate as they do, charging artificially inflated prices in a corporatized market. Haven't you ever pondered the question "who's regulating the regulators?" Have you ever wondered why congressmen with yearly salaries of 180,000 retire in multi million dollar homes? We have to start understanding the reality of the current system.
@tubeboy8 I understand the reality of the current system. Where we differ is where we place the blame. When it comes to insurance, I blame the SYSTEM that incentivizes not providing health care. When it comes to U.S. government, I blame the INDIVIDUALS because I know the underlying structure of gov't has worked in the past.
We do need restrictions on lobbying, that's obvious. But we shouldn't be scrapping all gov't regulation.
@shalcall "When it comes to insurance, I blame the SYSTEM that incentivizes not providing health care." Are you implying that the very 'system' you speak of does not include govt? The 'system' is one in which govt policy and legislation is practically dictated by corporate agenda. How do you reconcile govt being excluded from the equation? Where we differ is that you see the corporate world as one that's separate from govt, I see clearly that they're essentially one in the same.
@tubeboy8 I'm implying that regardless of government's involvement, the health insurance industry will always SUCK at providing health care because the profit motive in that industry is based on NOT providing care. If you removed all government regulation from that industry it would be WORSE not better.
And while I agree that the corporate world is too intertwined in modern government, I'm looking to end that relationship WITHOUT destroying gov't, which has a legitimate and necessary purpose.
@shalcall Nobody's debating the necessity for govt. But its fundamental role as protector of 'the people' has gradually become that of protector of the corporate world. I agree that the insurance industry will always be driven by profit motive, but there becomes much more of an incentive to fill a void in the market when there's genuine competition. Right now that void is consumer access to 'affordable' insurance, and that's because of government's involvement not their lack of involvement.
Ron Paul lost Before and he will lose again. He jsut don't have the ability to win a presidential election. Don't hate him. Don't wish anything bad on him. He just can't make it to the whitehouse.
oh cmon, these storys are ok once in a while, but you do them to often, it makes me choose to not click on videos because its to fucking stupid of a "news" story
spaik007 4 days ago
@spaik007
Look how old it is retard.
If you're this dumb just off yourself.
mecher3k 2 days ago
@mecher3k why would you tell anyone that. there is a person behind the comment who has a right to his own opinion no matter how dumb you think he is for it.
ninjaHJ1 2 days ago
@ninjaHJ1
It's not how dumb I think it is, it's how dumb it actually is.
mecher3k 1 day ago
@mecher3k no matter how you say it is what you said is highly inappropriate. you have to think about what you say because to you it could be nothing but for who ever you directed it at it could really mean something to them.
ninjaHJ1 1 day ago
I got no respect for this news channel. Who cares!
donrobertoni 1 week ago
I'm so glad we have this kind of alternative media to get to the real issues >.<
saxophone323 1 week ago
I noticed this at that debate, but it is just different colors of brow and long hairs
DCUPtoejuice 1 week ago
allergies can cause hair loss
sadbutsandman91 1 week ago
I talk to this girl that went to Cornell, IVY League college, and I bring up Ron Paul and what she adds to the conversation is, "He's got some weird eyebrows." I'm looking at her like so, what he is now discredited as a politician? The girl at the same time hadn't trimmed her eyebrows for literally weeks and was like I don't care too much about physical appearance these days. This is why America is in the shape that it's in. The idiocy and hypocrisy.
omarlives 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
wvvwvwvwvvw 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
wvvwvwvwvvw 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
wvvwvwvwvvw 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
wvvwvwvwvvw 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
wvvwvwvwvvw 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know why he said that about the allergies, probably Ron sneezed & his eyebrow thing came down. Anyways the media is constantly trying to humiliate the candidates running for office and you can't blame them for being defensive. Maybe Jesse just did not have a lie on the tip of his tongue to say. You know Ron Paul & his crew are kind of inexperienced at lying. If you had asked one of the others they would have thought up of a perfectly believable lie in a split second like second nature.
wvvwvwvwvvw 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
wvvwvwvwvvw 3 weeks ago
Its a joke story guys calm down. Why can't we have fun once in a while, the NDAA and ACTA is pretty depressing.
mufc4everch 1 month ago
Who the hell cares?
Ruzlier 1 month ago
Slow news day.
assemblyguy 1 month ago
i dont care if he has a fake eye brow and even lied about it! ohhh...lets talk about how fucked up ur face is..on tv!... jesus. they will use ANYTHING to shoot down ron paul on tv i've noticed. he's so ignored and bad mouthed. that amazing head should be on mount rushmore!
likethesea14 1 month ago
Ok calm down. Damn. Why can't TYT have a time to lay off from being serious.
koolj1994 1 month ago
Hey you, Mr. Ignorance, how about you take a mere *TWO SECONDS* to Google: "allergy eyebrow loss" before you make snarky, idiotic remarks about a man's *EYEBROWS.*
Honestly, who the hell cares? It's stupid, trivial issues like this that distract people from the truth and his actual *MESSAGE.*
As a side-note, if you had a condition in which your eyebrows were thinning, would you want people to be making fun of you for it?
AlexWerkmeister712 1 month ago
at least he doesn't have eyebrows like our UK ex-chancellor alistair darling ( type in alistair darling muppet into google images)
dzordevjt 1 month ago
What the hell are you talking about? This was the most nonsensical "controversy" I have ever seen. What's going on of America right now? Next stop is electing Santorum as president.
carlosandregoes 1 month ago 2
@carlosandregoes ur so right man.
people are just blind.
DreamTeamGreen 1 month ago
Fake eyebrow or not.... he is the rest of the world`s HOPE! USA need to stop acting like fools, every other Presidental Candidate looks like power sick people. Why isn`t there any normal person as Presidental Candidate`s?
ryvaenge 1 month ago
Cry for me you little Bitch ass RonBots, let's see those tears you TWATS!
deeppurple28 1 month ago
This guys makes a lot of good po
weswill2008 1 month ago
'The Young Turks'; Quality journalism.
My ass.
beefking69er 1 month ago
Cenk has a fake brain.
Willscot87 1 month ago 3
Discussing Ron Paul's eyebrows? Looks like TYT has some real important issues to discuss, huh? Fucking liberals.
Cheisu7 1 month ago 3
@Cheisu7 fuking liberals ? isn't ron paul pretty much a liberal himself ?
lol
jk4d 1 month ago
@Cheisu7 HA HA HA I love this video, I love seeing the little faggot ass RonBots cry like the little bitches that they are! LOL LOL! Ron Paul's TOUPEE FTW! LOL LOL!
deeppurple28 1 month ago
@Cheisu7 Chill out, you idiot. I've watched dozens of these tonight alone, and the vast majority have been on serious issues. So one story happens to be a little fluff piece for humor's sake? What's your problem? Get that stick out of your ass.
MsLilithJS 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos 5
@MsLilithJS TYT has been distributing communist propaganda for years. Get the blindfold off of your eyes first.
Cheisu7 1 month ago
@Cheisu7 TYT reports actual truth through actual videos and then comments. Are you saying the videos are doctored? You can't dispute fact.
MsLilithJS 1 month ago
@Cheisu7 it's not serous news, get over yourself
TheD33V33 1 month ago 2
@Cheisu7 I doubt they really care, because in other videos they say these issues really are just stupid.
I think they are just talking about it because it's just a funny thing is all, and it makes sense because all politicians to this and make sure they look a certain way since that effects people views of them if they look even a little off on anything.
It's really interesting when you look into it, how those things effect peoples decisions subconsciously.
TheSolitaryTraveller 1 month ago
@Cheisu7 they did it in their second hour. the second hour is the entertainment/goof of hour.
IvanTheHealer 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
@Cheisu7 TYT reports on politics, celebrity gossips, news stories, silly news stories, viral videos...they report on a bunch of stuff. So they report on something that doesn't really matter. That doesn't mean they only cover unimportant issues. Don't be a douche about it.
Robizdamanwitdaplan 1 month ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
RONPAUL=OUR ONLY CHOICE
ALL NEOCON GOP & OBAMA ARE THE SAME. They Love Wars & Permanent Detentions, They Love Burning US Constitution, They Love NDAA, SOPA, Patriot Act, FISA & Spying on Americans, They Love Torture, Killing families w/ Drones, Guantanamo & Drug War, They Love Corporate Bailouts & Subsidies, They Love Giving TRILLIONS to Pentagon & War Industry, They Love Zionists, AIPAC & sending Israel TRILLIONS, They Love Fed Reserve and WONT Audit it, They Love Fascism & they ALL take Bribes
halcyon0830 1 month ago
Dr Ron Paul= ONLY USA PATRIOT WHO PUTS AMERICA FIRST, ALL OTHERS (GINGRICH, OBAMA, ROMNEY, PERRY, BACHMAN, HUNTSMAN, SANTORUM ARE ONLY LOYAL TO ISRAEL & AIPAC)
Ron= ONLY ONE WHO WONT START A WAR WITH IRAN BASED ON LIES
Ron= ONLY ONE WHO RESPECTS US CONSTITUTION, HATES NDAA & PATRIOT ACT, FIGHTS FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES, WANTS YOU TO HAVE MORE FREEDOM & CHOICE, RON LOVES CAPITALISM (NOT CORPORATISM, NOT TOO BIG TO FAIL, NOT BAILOUTS, NOT SUBSIDIES, NOT FASCISM)
RON WILL BRING MONEY & JOBS BACK TO USA
halcyon0830 1 month ago
Ron Paul IS THE ONLY Conservative, he is THE ONLY Patriot, and he is THE ONLY Constitutionalist in the Republican Party.
Ron Paul is an Eisenhower-Goldwater-Lincoln Always-Honest America-First Classic True CONSERVATIVE.
All the other Republicans ARE STATISTS, FASCISTS, INSIDER TRADERS AND TRAITORS TO THE CONSTITUTION & USA.
They commit TREASON EVERY DAY by being Slaves to AIPAC, WAR, Fed Reserve, K-Street Moneyed interests who are bent on destroying Capitalism, Competition and Future of America.
halcyon0830 1 month ago
As you get older, the outward part of your eyebrow thins out, at times, almost non-existent. He has longer hair in the middle of his eyebrow that is drooping downward away from the middle of his eyebrow. His manager probably meant he had rubbed his eyes due to allergies, which caused his eyebrow to get messed up. It's nothing a little trim wouldn't fix. If this is the type of thing people put importance on, no wonder this country is fcked! Damn, who wants to vote for a Metro-Sexual, anyway?
Fesheca 2 months ago
Ron Paul is actually related to David Ferrie.
mpjgbx 2 months ago
your right cenk you dont need a fake eyebrow...doing a few hundred laps around the block wouldnt hurt though...
WarrivarNeo 2 months ago
true humor and not weak attacks and poking, im proud of TYT
nottinmatterz2day 2 months ago
I dont give a fuck who has fake eyebrows
nottinmatterz2day 2 months ago
Even his eyebrows are fake but his views on ending wars immediately and guaranteeing civil liberties are "real". Suuuuuuuure.
CarlosMonteiro1985 2 months ago
WTF IS THIS??? WHO GIVES A SHIT ???
nwoisnow 2 months ago
I know that ron paul has some strong views that needs to be discussed in a serious manner but i didn't know it was this serious.
r29 2 months ago
Don't you guys always fucken complain about the dribble in the media.. And you're talking about Ron Paul's eye brow.. Seriously. Many he had surgery and hair stopped growing who cares! Report on his beliefs you clowns and not his eye brows
iTitanium 2 months ago
After looking at a few photos, I'm pretty sure his right eyebrow is just messed up. He probably got cut there and it got scarred.
seinfan9 2 months ago
@ArcaneCossack , there is absolutely nothing wrong with no eyebrows~;) the man would have my vote if he had no limbs as long as he was still Ron Paul, still knew what he knows, and still stands for what he stands for~ all he is, is a representation of truth~ eyebrows, or no eyebrows~;)
schismatic37 2 months ago
@Moh5Itachi1 , there Are No Real criticisms of Ron Paul~XD so making an observation of stupidity now makes me a cult follower? w0w~ don't worry, I'll leave that observation of stupidity open for someone else~ 0.o RON PAUL 2012~:)
schismatic37 2 months ago
"he's allergies acted up a bit" Take a joke retard!
Andersll11 2 months ago
we demand to know if the valances match the carpet!
sc666666 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who cares? Ron Paul 2012!
CuriousGeorgeMonkey9 2 months ago
I knew he was a fake at something.
Sclunger 2 months ago
Funny how Ron Paul is so perfect in every way, These haters/media has to make fun of his eyebrow to make him look bad.
NewSimpleadams 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
also part of the ron paul gestapo, and i liked it! lol...... RON PAUL 2012!!
jdw3443 3 months ago
I didn't think TYT would worry about someones eye brows, and this is news!
TheNova1960 3 months ago
@ventures58 I'm part of the Ron Paul gestapo, and I like your comment
LifeLibertyNow 3 months ago
shutter speed, this guy is fantastially ADHD, and a twitch in normal.
hallcrash 3 months ago
Comment removed
hallcrash 3 months ago
3:26 - Cenk just said he is in the top 1%
Occupy Eyebrow
djdogjuam 3 months ago 25
Wow dude, this is your news? Hey you're a fucking moron!! Your shit is wack!!
Spazzfrom1989 3 months ago
Ron Paul is the ONLY ONE YOU CAN VOTE FOR BECAUSE..
All Other Republicans and Obama ARE THE SAME. They Love Wars and Starting New Wars, They Love Shredding the Constitution, They Love Patriot Act, They Love Corporate Bailouts, They Love Corporate Subsidies, They Love Giving Trillions to the Pentagon and Military Industrial Complex, They Love Zionists, Israel & AIPAC & Sending them TRILLIONS, They Love the Federal Reserve and DO NOT want to Audit it, They Love the Top 1% & they Love to be Bribed.
halcyon0830 3 months ago
Top comments: Most libertarians who are subscribed to TYT don't think Obama is a socialist, quite the reverse, they think he is a corporatist working for Goldman Sachs (and the case could be argued successfully).
And as to the video, watch other vids and pictures of Ron Paul from the late 80's, his right brow is slightly different from his left one. It isn't some weird brow wig, it's the way it has always looked. See for yourself. It's genes; people don't have perfectly symmetrical brows.
Otzmatron 3 months ago
Comment removed
Otzmatron 3 months ago
Great job wasting all of our time. How about covering what really matters.
colombiasb3st 3 months ago
Its repulsive..... Americans have become such fat-sweaty mongoloids.... they dont care about what Paul says.... they only care about how he looks. Why dont you vote for Kim Kardashian? If your founding fathers were alive they'd have a heart attack. GO PAUL!!!!
enkidupont 3 months ago
There seems to be no end to the nonsense people will talk about. Am I the only one who has seen older men who have really long eyebrow hair and, instead of trimming it, keep it "combed" across the brow? It seems so obvious to me that this is what is going on and the loose part just falls down sometimes when he sweats or something. Eyebrow toupe professional? Please. Most importantly, WHO CARES!!
majesticmalfeasance 3 months ago
RONBOT V.1280 REPORTING FOR DUTY..... 111100001101010010101100RONPAUL0101001010101010010101
HokkaidoNightfire 3 months ago
i'll take a guy with fake eyebrows who supports the constitution above those other well-enbrowed pricks any day
thejustineaster 3 months ago
@shalcall So, why not ONLY REGULATE those who do harm? why do you have an incessant need to regulate everyone for the minority who do bad things? Are you a control freak, or oblivious to the tyranny and bad impacts on the economy you are causing with your blanket Bs regulation in the name of "safety" and other "common goods"?
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall And seatbelts wouldn't be taken out of cars, customers want them. That's like saying air bags would be taken out, or murder would magically be legal without govt...lol. Murder was illegal in anarchist Ireland too you know. Same for any place stateless society existed. Murder and rape and air bags aren't there because the govt forces it, and regulations stufle competition for big companies to monopolize. Do you like monopolies? Or just ignorant to the fact they use regulations? Hmmm.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall Also that K-12 is of shitty quality if you hadn't noticed...and getting worse every generation.
Your NEED to protect is BS justification for tyranny. Next you'll tell me YOU NEED to extort me on the threat of kidnapping to fund this stuff...oh wait YOU already do. It's called tax on threat of prison. Some protection...more like a protection racket like the Mafia if you ask me. Fuck the collective, indivuals have rights, not collectives.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall First of all the toxins in the water is called Externality Fallacy, pleaee read "Externality Fallacy: The Failure of the Statist Economic Case". The FDIC is moral hazard that makes banks more likely to go belly-up, logically. What would be preferable is to prosecute and punsih severely harm and fraud, not regulate and legalize fraud (fractional banking, less than 100% deposits, etc.). So it's cute you believe those things protect you, but they don't. That K-12 is brainwashing BTW.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@ProIndividual I'm sorry. I can't take someone seriously who uses the word "statist" as often as you do in your writing. Are you an anarchist? Because then the difference between our thinking is much more fundamental than opinions on resource allocation.
shalcall 3 months ago
@shalcall Statist is real word, it someone who subscribes to the philsophy that the compulsory state (force) is the best way to organize society. There are two ways to organize society, voluntarily or by violence and threats of violence. I don't take anyone to be moral or intellectual who IS a statist, so I could care less what you taek seriously. You have no morals of worth or philsophy with ethics to speak of. Yes, I am an anarchist..proudly. I reject violence and coercion by you or by proxy.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@ProIndividual Given that you're an anarchist, there is very little that we could agree with when it comes to either government or capitalism (given that even a laissez faire system requires government to enforce property rights).
Given that, why bother arguing?
shalcall 3 months ago
@shalcall You're using an adhominem...we don't need to agree on anything to debate the issue at hand, which was regulation...if you can't defend your ideas logically and are forced to informal logical fallacies, like ad hominem attacks (attack the opponent personally, not the issue at hand) then you concede the debate. My personal philosophy is not relevant to whether regulating the 100% for negative actions of the 2% (the percentage of sociopaths in society) is beneficial socially/economically.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@ProIndividual I am not attempting to negate the truth or falsity of your claim by stating you're an anarchist. As such, I'm not making an ad hominem argument. I'm simply stating that there is no point in arguing with an anarchist because there are few, if any, axioms about either the economy or the government that we could agree on. We can't argue about the efficiency of gov't intervention if you don't believe in the necessity of gov't. Our disagreements are more fundamental.
shalcall 3 months ago
@shalcall And BTW, govt is not required to have property rights, you might want to read history. Human beings existed in stateless societies for at least 80% of human history, and nearly all of that time had rights to personal and private property. The state can only infringe upon a right. And don't confuse courts with the state...government is not the state. Voluntary govt is like boxing, the state (compulsory govt) is assault. The difference is night and day. Vol Govt is allowed in anarchism.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall And since you opened the can of worms of attacking personal philsophies...how is it that you support extortion (tax) on the threat of kidnapping (prison) and think that's a good moral position to hold in life? Do you honestly compromise all moral/ethical integrity out of nostalgia, intellectual laziness in finding alternatives, or in the belief it's immoral to extort on the indivudla level, but when you do it by proxy because you can't figure out how to make it unnecessary, it's okay?
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@ProIndividual Where did I attack your personal philosophies? I asked if you were an anarchist. You said yes. I said, then there is no point in arguing about more complex issues. I can't see where I've attacked you. Just because I'm not willing to waste time arguing with someone who fundamentally disagrees (and clearly STRONGLY disagrees) with my basic beliefs doesn't mean I'm attacking you.
shalcall 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shalcall Quote:" I'm sorry. I can't take someone seriously who uses the word "statist" as often as you do in your writing."
I'm sorry you can't accept me calling a philosophy what it is. I suppose I could call it "evilism", "violencism", or "aggressionism" to make you feel better...but that would be SOPHISM. So, since you tried to discount my argument simply based on my personal beliefs and vernacular, YOU ad hominem'd where you should of debated content. Got it? I accept your concession.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall The waste of time is even engaging anyone in a debate who does not parrot your worldview...not debating people diametricly opposed to it. See, usuallu in debate, two sides do not share a common belief.
So when you read what I asked you to, then debate the ideas on their merits, not on who said them and what that person believes outside of the subject at hand, then we can have what some folks call a DEBATE. Otherwise, you intellectual wave a white flag by way of logical fallacy.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall you intellectually*
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall And in case you forgot, before you ad hom'd, the topic was externality being an excuse for blanket regulation, and whether or not it is socially or economically beneficial. You thought it WAS beneficial in at least a social sense, I went about giving something to read that logically explains why it is neither economically nor socially beneficial to regulate in the way you support. The debate should focus on this KEY point, not my philosophy or vernacular. Logic 101, got it? Good.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@ProIndividual My last comment on this topic. I will not waste time arguing with someone about the efficiency of government intervention (and no where did I say externalities excuse blanket government regulation, but thanks for being dishonest) when the person on the opposing side believes that ANY funding of government that is not voluntary is violence. Just like I wouldn't argue with someone about the merits of a particular T.V. show if that person believes that T.V. is the devil incarnate.
shalcall 3 months ago
@shalcall All of our regulation is blanket. We only regulate pre-emptively...otherwise we'd be doing ONLY regulation of Harm and Fraud; a free market version. So you are for pre-emptive blanket regulation, because all pre-emptive regulation is blanket regulation. Unless you're psychic of course...lol.
Thanks for not even knowing your own position well enough to defend it.
And again, debate the points, not my philsophy..it's logically irrelevant.
BTW, all compulsion is violence; think.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall Your philosophical position (that the state is necessary or even preferable) is an affirmative position. You are saying violence, like tax, is necessary to stop violence (either foreign or domestic), which logically fails on it's premise. My position is not affirmative, it's the default position. My position is no innocent deserves to be forced to do anything violently or on threat of violence (prison is kidnapping for extortion-tax). So, your position needs justifying. Do so, or fail.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall This philsosophical debate has been going on since the 6th Century BC. The argument on externality being an excuse for regulating pre-emptively (blanket regulation), as opposed to free market "regulation" (it's an unregulated market actually) of only harm and fraud, has been going on since Keynesians came up with externality as an excuse for their interventions. If you refuse to listen to the other side and debate it, we win by default...as we've been doing for decades now. Dogma..yuck
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall I expect you, if a logical human being, to make your argument for addressing externalities, and the benefits socially/economically. I do NOT expect you to make your argument for defending your moral theory (if yopu even have one)...as there is no defense for it. :)
You: We need a monopoly on violence to protect us from initiations of force, foreign and domestic.
Me: And how might you fund this monopoly?
You: By initiating violence (tax), of course.
Me: That fails logically on premise.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall or in the belief it's immoral to extort on the individual level,*
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall So, thanks for hiding behind an ad hominem, and refusing to debate logical ideas...I accept your concession.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall PLZ excuse my typos, spelling of "philosophy" was purposeful to fit the word limits, others were accidental, such as forgetting articles in sentences. I'm sure my meaning comes through well enough.
Also let me mention, if the topic was resource allocation my philosophy and ethics (anarchism) are irrelevant to the debate, hence why I called it an ad hominem attack. Economics are separate from philosophy. I know many socialist and capitalist anarchists, and statists also.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@shalcall Anytime you feel like addressing the fallacy you presented about externality justifying regulation, let me know. I gave you something to read on the subject, when you can retort it, private message me on here so we can discuss it at length...it doesn't lend itself to character restrictions in the comment section, as you'll see if you bother to read the other point of view instead of swallowing established dogma.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@kazooga1234 Roe vs Wade is not in the Constitution, it's Supreme Court Decision. Interpretation is not Amendment.
So my point stands unscathed.
ProIndividual 3 months ago
@ProIndividual yes it is and i can prove that in a link if you want me to it is under the 4th amendment the right to privacy but it should be under the 13th slave labor because forcing a women to have a baby isnt just work for free its work for negitive dollars but pricks like you dont give a shit about that you just enjoy women suffering
if you want the links that prove that abortion is in the constitution just let me know
kazooga1234 3 months ago
The guy is 75 years old, let him have a fake eye brow if he wants one
GotYarbles 3 months ago
it's pretty sad when you've got to stretch to your conception of his physical appearance just to have something bad to say about the guy~ well... it's great for us Ron Paul supporters... but still sad for everybody else~ ;)e
schismatic37 4 months ago
@schismatic37 It's pretty sad that you think that ppl are using this as any real criticism of Ron Paul rather than just making a joke of it. Srry if we offended you by making a little joke of your cult leader.
Moh5Itachi1 3 months ago
@schismatic37 what's wrong with having no eyebrows
ArcaneCossack 3 months ago
holy heck, you've never seen long eyebrows before? allergies acting up=blowing his nose, rubbing his eyes, you know, the kind of stuff real people do~ you must be the type of people who wear pounds of make-up and dream of artificial breast implants~ typical spuds~ time to open the cover of that weird Real Man's book~ maybe you'll learn how to see reality~ ...I doubt it, but none the less, it's still there to find~ 0.o RON PAUL 2012.
schismatic37 4 months ago
It's his real eyebrow dummies. It's been like that for years now. Maybe a scar or injury caused it, idk. Maybe it's the first time people are really looking at him.
premieraudiomasterin 4 months ago
'I always think it's a sign of victory when they move on to the ad hominem'.
—Christopher Hitchens.
'Liberals' (globalist socialists) stand no chance. Ron Paul 2012.
Otzmatron 4 months ago
@Otzmatron Sigh. Anyone who knows what socialism is would never call Obama or his ideas socialist. People who say that just look so uneducated and ignorant. I'm positive you could neither define socialism in your own words, nor explain how liberals and Obama are socialist. These are the same people who will insist the Earth is only 6,000 years old.
magenta471 4 months ago 14
@magenta471 Obama has not been a socialist. He's been useless. If you think he's done anything for you, you are truly beyond redemption. You're watching a channel that says the exact same thing. You're being shafted by both the Republicrats and the Demopublicans. If you want social security, you go ahead and have it, but as a libertarian, I should be able to opt out of this nonsense and take care of myself. Imposing it on me is not liberal and lovely, it is tyrannical and oppressive. Savvy?
Otzmatron 4 months ago
@magenta471 National healthcare and increased social programs are socialism, dumbfuck.
Agentisnoob 2 months ago
@Agentisnoob Wow. Really? So are Sweden, Germany, Canada, Bristian, etc., all socialist countries? Are their citizens socialists? Are their leaders? Again, you have no clue whatsoever what socialism is. I feel like a college education should be mandatory so we don't end up with morons like you. That, or we desperately need to improve our education system.
magenta471 1 month ago
@Agentisnoob im from the UK, we arent socialist haha. Its just being more liberal
HotCyberShot 1 month ago
P.A.T.R.P.C
People
Against
The
Ron
Paul
Cult.
trapness123 4 months ago
Really. Who cares?
mrrossjonathan 4 months ago
Cenk is honestly like the peoples magazine or E! of politics
BWKsoccer06 4 months ago
The guy refuses to wear a tailored suit, or expensive shoes. Do you really think he would wear fake eyebrows? Look at pictures of 4 years ago, it looked exactly the same.
I admit, Benton's response made me cringe.
bluesc11 4 months ago
"ooga booga i dunno how dis eyebrow industry be surviving" Not funny... Its not an "Industry" so to speak, or a sub culture. Its just a one off product to give you better physical appearance to appeal to all the shallow morons like these turd slurping turks who are having an autistic fit over a 75 year old mans physical appearance. Absolutely pathetic. Stupid cheap shot liberal idiots.
JoanBeatrington001 4 months ago
@JoanBeatrington001 If you would stop foaming at the mouth for a minute over your hatred of liberals you would realize how ironic your statement is for calling us shallow when Ron Paul is the one wearing fake eyebrows. I mean why would someone worry about something like that? I'd never even heard of fake eyebrows until now. You'd have to be extremely vain and shallow to care about that.
I wonder, if Ron Paul was wearing fake eyelashes or fingernails would you just casually ignore that too?
whythehell99 4 months ago
Comment removed
JoanBeatrington001 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@whythehell99 You're an idiot plain and simple. Arguing over fake eyebrows on a 75 year old man instead of his actual policies on youtube makes you an idiot and id like to think i still have enough integrity to engage in a mindless debate with a liberal faggot over this. Goodbye
JoanBeatrington001 4 months ago
Young Turks, perpetuating classy and pertinent news.
Ender503 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012, Google it.
lgvereor 4 months ago
This wouldnt mean anything...
Accept for the fact that Paul supporters love to point out how he's the only candidate whose picture is not on his own book....
....yet he wears fake eyebrows
dead
reztech8 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He does not accept money from SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS and CORPORATE EILITE AS ROMNEY AND OBAMA AND CAIN DO. THEY TRADE FAVORS!! Ron Paul a true Patriot, Go to his site and donate, buy shirts and signs, donate today!! $2.5+ Million raised by us stupid AMERICANS , at least according to Herman Cain!
miracleneeded 4 months ago
OH MY GOD YOUNG TURKS. THANKS FOR USEFUL NEWS AGAIN...I WONT VOTE FOR RON PAUL NOW BECAUSE OF THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!
shSam92 4 months ago
@shSam92 Not the point they were making. Stop yelling in caps.lol
dakoneko 4 months ago
@dakoneko I was being sarcastic because TYT are a joke, so left winged its ridiculous. They consider this actual news, and you obviously didnt hear what that retard said at the end.......smh.....
shSam92 4 months ago
Those that have any different opinion on Ron Paul over fake fucking eyebrows are shallow, shallow people
TheMarksmenCat 4 months ago
Cenk always asks himself rhetorical questions, and then there's an awkward pause because nobody answers and he stumbles all over himself. That is my favorite part of TYT
elpapapeloquin 4 months ago
So were gonna start talking about eyebrows, because you got nothing else creditable and logically explainable on Ron Paul? We are winning......:)
scalp340 4 months ago
wow u guys are fuck faces. the one guy telling the truth, lets look at his fucking eyebrows. so much fail you douchelick
IzaFaqat 4 months ago
Of course this is the only thing TYT gives a damn about
pwnurnoobazz 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why does the eye brow even matter? Talking about cheap issues makes you look cheap.
Cenk Uygur and his team are cheap idiots.
poreddys 4 months ago
Comment removed
poreddys 4 months ago
Comment removed
poreddys 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
same ! fake or not hes got my vote.
rx327prime 4 months ago
If you look at all his campaign pictures on his site and Flickr his right eyebrow is always way thicker than his left one. I think he just naturally has a thicker longer right eyebrow that can be parted or looks funny with certain lighting. My grandpa had a double eyebrow and some long ear hairs that could be mistaken for sideburns. You think you have problems with your nose hair/ear eyebrow hair now wait till you hit 70.
imaginenothingness 4 months ago
he is 76 years old.
I don't think it should matter what the guy looks like, but don't lie about it.
MoldytoasterMedia 4 months ago
Fake or not...he's not gonna win.
CHAOSoriginal 4 months ago in playlist More videos from TheYoungTurks
I have been acting professionally since 1965, and have worn many hairpieces. Ron Paul has an excellent hairpiece, almost undetectable. But of you look at a full screen still of him, you'll notice just about his right ear the faint line of the transparent netting. More obvious is the way his right temple has a vertical wrinkle inconsistent with the rest of the skin there--that's the netting pulling virtically just a little. It's beautiful, but it's not real.
rhenz111 4 months ago
I doubt it was Ron Paul who were all like "guys, please give me some fake eyebrows"... probably just got put on him during makeup or something.
Odinshi 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The media is trying to dictate us who we need to choose. Propping up Bachmann, then Perry now Cain while simultaneusly propping up Romney blacking out Ron Paul the whole season. Will the people just sit there and take it? Or will they stand up today and say "Black THIS Out!"
The Ron Paul moneybomb is running strong today but it needs your help. Donate what you can to help the free world.
fatjohn1408 4 months ago
Why does this even matter?
Necrogigas 4 months ago
The propaganda Turk-ics are at it again turkey season almost open
GovernMentalFreedom 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol all the Ron paul supporters visited this video and dislike this page. So many of them on the internet. I can't watch a single political video without seeing "Ron Paul 2012" Its getting annoying now.
ThatTyGuy95 4 months ago
Search: Ron Paul MoneyBomb October 19th
Slave2Reason 4 months ago
fake or not hes got my vote.
laylowfreehumanity 4 months ago
Holy shit there are so many arguments going on here, I was expecting to see a lot of funny jokes on the content and instead...
deathdollmania 4 months ago
Fuck 493 cocksuckers who can't bear to hear anything negative about ron paul.
SPRoubi2020 4 months ago 5
Picture is worth a thousand words. What an idiot!
aaronpolitical 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shalcall The issue here is about greed and corruption. You're suggesting stricter oversight by the very entity helping to make it possible for insurance companies to operate as they do, charging artificially inflated prices in a corporatized market. Haven't you ever pondered the question "who's regulating the regulators?" Have you ever wondered why congressmen with yearly salaries of 180,000 retire in multi million dollar homes? We have to start understanding the reality of the current system.
tubeboy8 4 months ago
@tubeboy8 I understand the reality of the current system. Where we differ is where we place the blame. When it comes to insurance, I blame the SYSTEM that incentivizes not providing health care. When it comes to U.S. government, I blame the INDIVIDUALS because I know the underlying structure of gov't has worked in the past.
We do need restrictions on lobbying, that's obvious. But we shouldn't be scrapping all gov't regulation.
shalcall 4 months ago
@shalcall "When it comes to insurance, I blame the SYSTEM that incentivizes not providing health care." Are you implying that the very 'system' you speak of does not include govt? The 'system' is one in which govt policy and legislation is practically dictated by corporate agenda. How do you reconcile govt being excluded from the equation? Where we differ is that you see the corporate world as one that's separate from govt, I see clearly that they're essentially one in the same.
tubeboy8 4 months ago
@tubeboy8 I'm implying that regardless of government's involvement, the health insurance industry will always SUCK at providing health care because the profit motive in that industry is based on NOT providing care. If you removed all government regulation from that industry it would be WORSE not better.
And while I agree that the corporate world is too intertwined in modern government, I'm looking to end that relationship WITHOUT destroying gov't, which has a legitimate and necessary purpose.
shalcall 4 months ago
@shalcall Nobody's debating the necessity for govt. But its fundamental role as protector of 'the people' has gradually become that of protector of the corporate world. I agree that the insurance industry will always be driven by profit motive, but there becomes much more of an incentive to fill a void in the market when there's genuine competition. Right now that void is consumer access to 'affordable' insurance, and that's because of government's involvement not their lack of involvement.
tubeboy8 4 months ago
Don't blame Ron Paul for his campaign spokesman's nuttiness. Ron Paul has very little to do with his campaign.
Sistarovat 4 months ago
Moneybomb~~ October 19th~~ Ron Paul
rchicks22 4 months ago
its not a fake eyebrow.. its a combover eyebrow.. my father has one
eyebrows hairs dont gorow evenly and if you comb your eyebrows lenghtwise and dont trim them.. thats what you get.
kapachangos 4 months ago
PSY OP: TYT FAKE 'news' GOOGLE for yourself you fat fcuk to SEE up CLOSE: Ron Paul Ad - Life
jahibbyutube 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
people are really bored
72dew 4 months ago in playlist October 14
come on. everyone knows when your allergies are acting up you grow a second eyebrow.
watchthis992 4 months ago in playlist October 14
Ron Paul lost Before and he will lose again. He jsut don't have the ability to win a presidential election. Don't hate him. Don't wish anything bad on him. He just can't make it to the whitehouse.
DavethNative1 4 months ago