If i would of known that rocket was going to do that ahead of time, i would of just gone in when they were buying the stuff for it, beat the shit out of them and taken the money.
U.S Supreme Court judge: "Sir, you are being charged with stealing from the U.S. Government. . . . . are you stupid and WHY did you do it?"
Fro: "Your shit was going to blow the F$CK up, so i put your money to good use."
If a caveman or chicken saw this, they probably would have said something like," The ky is falling! The Sky is falling!"
A 17 foot long crack in the solid rocket boosters.... How do you miss that!!! I Mean seroiusly, the guy at nasa that's supposed to check that must have been slaking off big time! Good thing no one got hurt though!
@pokewiz309 I don't know the details, but it could have been, say, a 17' long stress crack on the inside of the solid rocket booster tube, which appeared after they filled it. The only way to detect that would be to xray it after the fact.
Yep... and they store those solid motors for months/years after loading them so it could have occoured over time.... and although the crack was 17' long id bet it was probably something like a couple thousands of an inch thick.... virtually invisible/
I was at the cape when this happend... I'll never forget the shockwave!!! I was only 10 back then and my mom grabbed me and I remember people hitting the ground and the glass wall we were sitting by just moving like crazy!!!! One hell of a memmory I tell you what!!!!
Why use composite materials to build the housing of the booster. Composites, though being made of carbon fiber and plastics and fiber glass, would seem to me to melt as the solid fuel burns upward inside the tube, is this composite materiel lined with something special, says asbestos or something that withstand the heat. As a model rocket enthusiast this has always eluded me, because Estes's rocket motors are made from dense cardboard, but are destroyed in the burn process?
I used to work on Delta II, it wasnt really a crack. The solid rocket cases are made from composite materials, carbon fiber and epoxy. The technical name is called a delamination which are areas within the case wall which did not bond correctly to the composite strains. Since it occurs within the wall it is not visable from the outer surface.
of course rockets are not safe... i just miss interpret it .. the military failed the rocket from a teroris attack...
it is impossible that the military did not see a the big crack... there was no big crack it was a bomb made by the terorist... ofcourse its classified information they wont let the public knew about this..
I love how calm that woman's voice is. "... Uh, yeah, It appears we've had an anomily..." WELL DUH!!!! At least no one was hurt. Still a waste of money, though.
The reason for the calmness is because they HAVE to keep a sense of professionalism. If they said "OH MY GOD IT EXPLODED" or if ANYONE stood up and began cheering upon a splashdown or launch they would be removed from that position.
In NASA you have to keep that sense of professionalism at all times
I find it dumb, when space shuttle shuttle launches, people are 3 miles away from the shuttle over the causway (at least i went there on the tour) and those bastards in launch control are 6 miles away in a bunker haha.
The launch angle is taken into consideration with this.
All rockets and STS's at Cape Canaveral and at Kennedy are launched in a easterly direction toward the ocean away from spectators and buildings.
This is not so much because of safety reasons but because of the rotation of the earth (from a west to east direction) makes attaining the orbit much easier. :-)
@dvaifilmsdotcom nope, plus there's a fair amount of distance from the pad to any human life that could be put in danger, plus it's fired away from land as well (not just vertically :P )
"it was determined that a 17 foot long crack was the cause for this most devastating explosion." How could you miss that? And after the explosion from shear video footage they determine this, how could they miss that if they can see it in footage? Biggest Cluster F in NASA (Columbia wasn't a cluster)
Sad..yes....whos fault...NASA's... at the begining the take off the rocket was off ballanced...the rocket bent in mid air causeing the rocket's booster to bend..break...then explode.
This has been flagged as spam show
If i would of known that rocket was going to do that ahead of time, i would of just gone in when they were buying the stuff for it, beat the shit out of them and taken the money.
U.S Supreme Court judge: "Sir, you are being charged with stealing from the U.S. Government. . . . . are you stupid and WHY did you do it?"
Fro: "Your shit was going to blow the F$CK up, so i put your money to good use."
Froinexorable 3 months ago
Comment removed
Froinexorable 3 months ago
no one was injured?? there were just a few thousand deaths probably -.-
D3monPr0ductions 7 months ago
An anomaly? That's a nice understatement...
AvoinTarina 9 months ago
A 17 foot long crack? How the hell did they miss that???
strizhi 10 months ago 2
If a caveman or chicken saw this, they probably would have said something like," The ky is falling! The Sky is falling!"
A 17 foot long crack in the solid rocket boosters.... How do you miss that!!! I Mean seroiusly, the guy at nasa that's supposed to check that must have been slaking off big time! Good thing no one got hurt though!
pokewiz309 11 months ago
@pokewiz309 I don't know the details, but it could have been, say, a 17' long stress crack on the inside of the solid rocket booster tube, which appeared after they filled it. The only way to detect that would be to xray it after the fact.
copperhamster 11 months ago
@copperhamster
Yep... and they store those solid motors for months/years after loading them so it could have occoured over time.... and although the crack was 17' long id bet it was probably something like a couple thousands of an inch thick.... virtually invisible/
TheKazable 9 months ago
holy sh! t, it is murderous! It was fortunate that space shuttle astronauts as Columbia and chalnger.
Columbia -
yarintsukrun 11 months ago
17 foot crack... was the reason for failure... of Washington DC mayor, film at 11!
reallyfubar 1 year ago
"We've had an anomaly..."
Love it!
MrStephenRGilman 1 year ago
ummm when th camera is moving left and ight i wouldnt be standing there i would be like "WHOLY SHIT GET IN THE FUCKING VAN RETARDS"
evanpine1 1 year ago
thank you for puting the info
jhoon234 1 year ago
It's pearl harbor day again!
TheNw1218 1 year ago
I was at the cape when this happend... I'll never forget the shockwave!!! I was only 10 back then and my mom grabbed me and I remember people hitting the ground and the glass wall we were sitting by just moving like crazy!!!! One hell of a memmory I tell you what!!!!
Waterfordmaxx 1 year ago
@Waterfordmaxx You were at Cape Canaveral, Florida at the time of the explosion of the Delta rocket that was carrying the then-new GPS R2 Sattelite?
pm41224 11 months ago
@pm41224 I mean, the then-new GPS 2R Sattellite?
pm41224 11 months ago
how in the hell can they miss a 17' long crack? aren't they supposed to do 100 safety checks before launch?
killerdaman 1 year ago
17' long crack in the boosters!!! That'll be it then...
boxferret 1 year ago
"We've just had an anomaly.." woman... it just turned to dust and fire in mid air... I'd say that's slightly more than just an anomaly.
Kittani1977 1 year ago
@Kittani1977 She was voted "Most understated" in her graduating class. We see why.
Of course, "We've had an anomaly..." sounds a lot more professional than "HOLY SHIT! DID YOU GUYS JUST SEE THAT?!?!?"
tybo09 1 year ago
ud think they would notice a 17 ft long crack in a rocket.... just sayin
suchy36 1 year ago
This accident surprised a lot of people because Delta rockets by that point were extremely reliable. Good thing nobody was hurt.
MattTheSaiyan 1 year ago
"The anomaly is in the shape of an explosion and quite fiery."
Racecarlock 2 years ago
Why use composite materials to build the housing of the booster. Composites, though being made of carbon fiber and plastics and fiber glass, would seem to me to melt as the solid fuel burns upward inside the tube, is this composite materiel lined with something special, says asbestos or something that withstand the heat. As a model rocket enthusiast this has always eluded me, because Estes's rocket motors are made from dense cardboard, but are destroyed in the burn process?
specialears 2 years ago
my dad worked on the gps sattelite in the rocket and made a home video on the launch and it was no terrist attack it was a cracked rocket booster
snailplasma 2 years ago
I want to know how they missed a 17 foot long crack...
?!?
SignalPathAudio 2 years ago
I used to work on Delta II, it wasnt really a crack. The solid rocket cases are made from composite materials, carbon fiber and epoxy. The technical name is called a delamination which are areas within the case wall which did not bond correctly to the composite strains. Since it occurs within the wall it is not visable from the outer surface.
ithicaplasma 2 years ago
im sure it was a terorist attack... the military wont tw\ell about it because they failed to secure the safetyness of a rocket
Abzyoutbero 2 years ago
And what makes you sure of that, exactly? Rockets are not exactly the safest of things.
Parrotguy1999 2 years ago
of course rockets are not safe... i just miss interpret it .. the military failed the rocket from a teroris attack...
it is impossible that the military did not see a the big crack... there was no big crack it was a bomb made by the terorist... ofcourse its classified information they wont let the public knew about this..
Abzyoutbero 2 years ago
I saw this one blow.
smilingdog 2 years ago
Hmm... I Think This Is What Armmaggeddon Might Have Looked Like Except Times 500
AZNPKER123 2 years ago
Stackars bilar!
HLkiller2 2 years ago
I love how calm that woman's voice is. "... Uh, yeah, It appears we've had an anomily..." WELL DUH!!!! At least no one was hurt. Still a waste of money, though.
ashinms 2 years ago
The reason for the calmness is because they HAVE to keep a sense of professionalism. If they said "OH MY GOD IT EXPLODED" or if ANYONE stood up and began cheering upon a splashdown or launch they would be removed from that position.
In NASA you have to keep that sense of professionalism at all times
danschaoticmind 2 years ago
what can i say... owned by physics or something?
lhtrf 3 years ago
That was awesome I want more
TheAlexFosterBlog 3 years ago
no one was injured??
dvaifilmsdotcom 3 years ago
No, the delta rocket is an unmanned rocket.
cometaa12 3 years ago
@cometaa12
its just a Satelite rocket built to blast satelites into orbit its range only goes to space
of course it can lift up a manned spacecraft but its not built for it and they wouldnt fit together with the systems
(a car tire doesnt fit to a train) thats for sure
predatortheme 1 year ago
I think he means in the area around the blast zone
Diehear 3 years ago 2
cometaa12 = mongoloid
panictactics 3 years ago
no, precisely that's why they clear the area of all people. so no one gets injured.
snoopyloopy 3 years ago
No, because everyone is kept 1/2 of a mile away from the launch pad
ned987 2 years ago
Comment removed
dvaifilmsdotcom 2 years ago
It was an unmanned rocket, so no one was in it. They fly them from mission control in TX.
cometaa12 2 years ago
3 miles
danschaoticmind 2 years ago
I find it dumb, when space shuttle shuttle launches, people are 3 miles away from the shuttle over the causway (at least i went there on the tour) and those bastards in launch control are 6 miles away in a bunker haha.
FSFchannel 2 years ago
The launch angle is taken into consideration with this.
All rockets and STS's at Cape Canaveral and at Kennedy are launched in a easterly direction toward the ocean away from spectators and buildings.
This is not so much because of safety reasons but because of the rotation of the earth (from a west to east direction) makes attaining the orbit much easier. :-)
shakenama 2 years ago
Yes, silly but in layman's terms it's easier to explain to the public that is was a "crack".
shakenama 2 years ago
@dvaifilmsdotcom nope, plus there's a fair amount of distance from the pad to any human life that could be put in danger, plus it's fired away from land as well (not just vertically :P )
Nickamsweet 5 months ago
"it was determined that a 17 foot long crack was the cause for this most devastating explosion." How could you miss that? And after the explosion from shear video footage they determine this, how could they miss that if they can see it in footage? Biggest Cluster F in NASA (Columbia wasn't a cluster)
FlamingPope 3 years ago 2
sorry for thumbs downing you. i pressed the wrong button =(
raikiruo 3 years ago
I agree with your statment, but that wasn't nasa... It was the air force.
ashinms 2 years ago
Holy Hell!
nicholasflamel7 3 years ago
if you look carefully, you can see that the no. 6 engine wasn't burning at lift off.
this was the one supposedly with the crack in it.
gordongate 3 years ago
Uhmm smart one that particular booster was actually one of the air lit solids. It was not supposed to be burning YET.....
Saab34O 3 years ago
Sad..yes....whos fault...NASA's... at the begining the take off the rocket was off ballanced...the rocket bent in mid air causeing the rocket's booster to bend..break...then explode.
GWrulez11 3 years ago
incredible disaster...!
41218648 3 years ago
first long video of this incident, very good.
astrorider 3 years ago
Thanks
cometaa12 3 years ago