Look at my Channel to see the real Garden of Eden. I'm the one who found it. It's location is in the Northwest section of Iran, not where everyone else is telling you to look.
Creationists are just so.........unevolved. They say they ain't descended from monkeys but at least monkeys try to faithfully interpret their environment and which must put monkeys on a far higher rung of the evolutionary ladder? The mindless believers are are just to be felt sorry for but the priests and apologists are the ones need disembowelling and be strangled with their own guts, the disingenuous cunts!
That "book" as you call it is GODS word!! The dark ages were cause by the Roman Catholics take over and people didnt learn from or understand the Bible. Science is not evolution! Science is a study of the way things work. I dont have to believe evolution to know how light bulbs or cars work. I'm all for science, but I'm not for evolution. We both believe what we believe by faith because neither one of us was there. But its obvious only one way can be right! God said it and I believe His word.
Pople that believe that creation is true also believe science is true! The Bible is full of science! Check your history it was falling away from the Bible that lead to the dark ages. Evolution has no base in science but is a therory!! One that is clearly not true!! God created in six literal days.
@cwz32710 Explain your reasoning. Please. First off, every creationist I've talked to says science, mostly evolution, is a joke. Second, the Dark Ages were caused by the Christians taking over because they censored all scientific advancement. Evolution is backed by science 100%. Just because it doesn't say how life was created proves nothing. In fact, evolution isn't a theory on how life was created so it wouldn't. And "God created in six literal days" has no true backing but a book.
@roont The impacts prove old earth. And the craters up to and over 200km diam. A soil volume moved is 150,000 to nearly half a million cubic kms (depending on depth). How many nuclear bombs would be required to do this? Billions of years explains why we are here but they put all the large impacts in the flood. As well as all the others, there are two confirmed impact craters larger than 200 km! Knowing how much soil excavated, how come anything survived (except a few microbes). No cr can answer
@cwz32710 Thee are a dozen confirmed impact craters (by iridium and other rare substances arond the rim) that are over 50 km diam on earth. Some are over 100 km diam, some around 200 km and over! The amount of soil and rock moved by a 200 km crater impact would be over 200,000 CUBIC KMs! How much energy required to do this in an instant! This is just ONE impact and there were many more. Billions of years explains why we are here but u put them all in the flood. How did any thing survive?
Another christian moron who thinks life came from a magic space daddy who wrote a bronze age book that is so vague, filled continuity errors and logical fallacies out the wazoo, horrible contradictions and atrocities.
@radioactiveego Fail. Just because I think the idea of life evolving from gas is absurd, doesnt mean I believe in the bible or a sky daddy. Dont be so quick to jump to conclusions, and there is no point attacking the bible when your religion is allso based on no evidence. You need to quit with the origin of life, its unknown and always will be. Keep in mind, there is just as much evidence for god as there is against= NONE!!!...
There is no evidence for god you idiot. If there is, prove it. People have been saying there is a god for thousands of years. The only problem is, there is no prove of any god ever existing..
And you're being a hypocrite over your 'ont be so quick to jump to conclusions' statement. The bible is getting attacked because it's full of nonsense. I am sorry your god didn't give you high enough IQs to know what is reality and what is fantasy.
@radioactiveego "There is no evidence for god you idiot" did I say there was? eeerrrrr.....NO. I said there is just as much evidence for god as there is against, NONE!!! Your waisting your breath ripping religion, you could debunk all religions. Would that disprove a deity??...eeerrrr..NO. "I am sorry your god didnt give you a big enough IQ" my god? jumping to conlusions again are we?. Agnostic actually, because I know in "reality" we dont know if god is or isnt.
@radioactiveego I suppose gas evolving into man, planets crashing into eachother and forming moons out of the earths crust is reality? I suppose you would say life from non life is reality, ASSHOLE. to say the least. there is no proof god made man, there is no proof man made himself...like i said earlier, drop the religions...athiests belief in planet formation by faith, theists believe in planet creation by faith...fuck all proof for either....all guess work and imagination..keep defending it.
@prophecy217 HAHAHAHAHA omg! you are sooo stupid! your scientific knowledge is that of a 3rd grader. actually let me take that back, i don't want to insult elementary kids. Seriously though dude, read a science book and quit it with the absurd strawmans, atheism requires no faith (it is the default position), we have evidence of how planets form, we see planets forming around other stars light years away, through natural processes. Why do people laugh at creationists is a good series to watch.
The prick who put this video on YouTube should watch the video of how Darwin enfluenced the Communist and Nazis that brought misery, destruction and death to millions. The stunted moronic neanderthals who believe in evolution will be in the hottest part of hell with other like minded Darwinist-Hitler, Marx, Lenin, Moa Zedong and Stalin.
@stagn41 : Where did you get the information ? I bet you watched "Ben Stein's" propaganda film "No intelligence allowed" Learn to think for yourself.. you are a danger to society with your lack of intelligence... god is the biggest serial killer of all time. Just read the bible.... according to the bible god has killed more nations of people than anyone else in the history of the world...."god= mass murderer"
If these morons would invest even HALF of their money, (not OURS), in education--we would all be better off and these peabrains might be able to evolve along with the rest of us.
A well deserved "honor" I'd say, even considering the strong competition Ham has for the title! And then consider how many people have visited this so-called museum, while actual museums that teach real science have been forced to close for lack of funds.
so go ahead & spread ur propaganda 2 the rest of the sheeple. but I'm not buying it, and I hope that many people who read my posts reconsider what they were brainwashd 2 believe in and start reading the bible. U r digging ur own grave buddy
I'm by all means NOT "holier than thou". but I hav common logical sense 2 believe that all men on this earth originate from Adam and Eve. That evolution is a man-made concept. and... the dinosaurs existed alongside w/ mankind. Many ancient artifacts prove this. Yet, most people won't believe in creationism, bcuz otherwise, they'll hav 2 come 2 terms w/ a Personal Force who holds them accountable 4 how they lived their lives!
@STRGATE7 Common logical sense... an invisible, intangible entity/concept created a man from mud and a woman from his rib and some more mud? Sounds like common sense to me. I'm assuming that you're a grown adult, which demonstrates how this indoctrination process and belief system can override logic and reason for a lifetime. It must be stopped.
@johnjhuff tru indocrination/brainwashing of the world is getting people 2 believe we evolved from apes, that dinosaurs only existd millions of yrs b4 humans, and the big bang. they r all speculations, since none of them can b proven by hard science. there is no "missing link", the "fossils in rock layers" theory involves circular reasoning, and no big bang-an explosion of matter from nothing is impossibl. whats the source of energy that would create the big bang?
@STRGATE7 I'm not going to waste too much time on someone who hasn't evolved from childhood mentality, but if you care to, you can look up transitional fossils on a search engine and see what all of that 'speculation' is about. Are you denying the existence of fossils? The Big Bang makes less sense to you than "god" did it? So "god" created energy. Let's tell the scientists to bring a halt to their research on that matter, and all research, actually. "god" did it. FAIL
@johnjhuff go ahead, u lost, come up w/ any & all kinds of justifications, excuses, and programmed opinion. "denying the existance of fossils" I said? Not only r u programmed 2 believe lies, but apparently, ur also illiterate. The truly enlightened 1s kno better than 2 believe in the world system's lies. But I won't bother 2 argue w/ u anymore.
BTW the big bang: something created from nothing equals nothing. I guess ur not smart enough 2 grasp the theory of relativety
@STRGATE7 No, I won. I'm an agnostic, and so is everyone else by definition. Apparently, you're not smart enough to spell at a third grade level, so much for enlightenment.
Also, stop using our terms for beLIEvers - sheeple, indoctrinated/brainwashed, circular reasoning... That is you, the ones who believe in utter nonsense and cannot think for yourselves. Examine your beliefs, I'm sure you won't, but you would be embarrassed if you actually did. It's alchemy.
@johnjhuff sir, I took the liberty 2 view ur channel, and I must say, u r 1 depraved tormented and sexually confused individual! so much so that I cannot hate u. instead, I will pray 4 u 2nite. I'll pray 2 Jesus that He alleviates the insiduous agnostic homosexual cancer that's eating away ur mind. Hopefully, u can change ur ways or at least quell ur insanity 4 the sake of not corrupting any more young people.
@STRGATE7 The only corruption going on is between the "christians" and the children whose minds they're poisoning.
I like good music and comedy. I like trying to make people examine their ridiculous beliefs, and to drop their bigotry. I'm sorry that you don't appreciate my video collection.
Please don't pray for me, I'd prefer some tangible action. However, if you'd like to mumble into the air, or out loud to an invisible, man-made concept, please feel free.
@TheGreatRL why don't u research Einstein's theory of relativety? (E=mc2)
Once u break it down, the theory concludes that matter and energy are mutual. Any type of matter can only b made by energy, and energy must come from some form of matter. The big bang relies on the premise that a pinpoint of matter suddenly explodes into this vast universe. But some intelligent force of energy had to have guided the creation of a universe that is so harmonious and in-sync.
@TheGreatRL u might ask: if God is energy, then what did God come from? Its been proven that energy never dies, and it always existd. Energy is all around u, and latent potential energy exists in matter. But we'll never know why the intelligent God is infinite, we'll only know after we die. That might not make sense 2 u, but it should make more sense than an intricet universe created from nothing
@STRGATE7 Being created from nothing is not that farfetched from saying that something with no proof of existence created everything. If I told you Zeus or Apollo created everything, you would probably think i'm crazy. But why? Why is this any different than God?
the reason why u call ken ham "prick of the week" is bcuz u don't want 2 face the TRUTH. the truth is is that God created man and all the animals of the earth (including what the brainwashd and bought paleotologists call "dinosaurs") in a short span of time, not in the course of millions of yrs apart. Ultimately, Darwin's satan-inspired theories of evolution r still unproven, but yet- public schools, system-run universities... hammer the "truth" into the ungodly youth...
Prick of the week? I know formally nominated him for prick of the century. Along with Kent Hovind. And Pat Robertson. Oh, and Jerry Falwell. And... well, you get the point...
Gotta admit, this video was pretty disappointing. I am a Creationist, but have respect for those who disagree with me, but I can tell that a majority of the respect Creationists show for post modern secular humanists and evolution scientists isn't reciprocated. I clicked on this video because I wanted to see the scientific arguments you had against Ken's Creationist teachings, and found none.
Wow, your are so dumb. You are really dumb. For real. Haha. Ken Ham is gonna be blessed by God tremendously. All the attacks he's receiving is from satan who doesn't want you to know the truth.
do you even have evidence that proves that ken ham is what you call a "prick"? after all you played absolutely nothing that you believe backs up why you think that way... nothing he said, did, nothing!
You're thinking of the old testament. Get your head out of the past and look to the futre instead of rovelling in fear of damnation just because a 2000 year old relic said so.
@roodyhoo What does God have to do with Ken Ham? Other than Mr. Ham using God as window dressing to fleece Christians out of their money.
And if we're going to talk about His word and works, why does everything we see in the world (His work) disagree with the Bible (His word)? Odd that.
And another thing: It doesn't matter if someone watches what they say. God knows what's in their hearts. God knows what you are thinking. Not saying something does not keep God from knowing you're thinking it.
That's beacuse gawwwd hid your microphone. jeeeezuuuz told me that. he sayeth , I will smote (smite?) his microphone and it shall be lost. For lo, this man does speak against my holy genetic defender. say ahhhmen, and send me a bazillion dollars so my ministry can continue it's war on rational logical thought while i tool about in a Jaguar, a BMW and a Lexus. Say hallelujah
TURN TO CHAPTER 40, IN VERSE 15 WE'RE TOLD! holy shit that is the most rocking song I've ever heard, I almost headbanged my brain out. where can I dl it? is there a black or death metal version?
The King James translators were aware of the Hippo and Crocodile, why didn't they just say that then instead of "Behemoth" and "Leviathan"? You say evolution is fact because change happens...You are trying to "prove" a theory with facts that are irrelevant. If you want to say evolution is a FACT then prove SCIENTIFICALLY with repeated test and observation how life came from non-life or how matter came to be by itself. That is required for evolution to be true matter came from nothing... amen
@AsaphProject Evolution has been observed in nature and in the lab.
Darwin wrote, Origin of Species, NOT origin of life, not the origin of matter and space-time. You are trying to "un-prove" a theory with facts that are irrelevant.
@gregrutz The only thing that has ever been observed is variation within a kind. There are limits to mutations and change, bugs can become immune to bug spray but can they become resistant to a sledge hammer? Pigs can be gentically altered to grow larger, but will they grow to be as big as a mountain? If limitless evolution is true they should, but I doubt it. I also find it hard to have a species without first having life. Factually, how did life begin in an evolutionary model?
What is Evolution actually?... Lets get an accurate specific interpretation of "Natural Selection"... When a person dies, is that natural selection,?. When a cat eats a mouse, is that Natural selection?. When a nomad family travels through the dessert and their skins pigment gets darker, is that Natural selection?. When a bacteria adapts to the medicine used to kill it, is that natural selection?. When a healthy child is born, is that Natural selection?.
Or, you could just look at the first paragraph on Natural Selection on Wikipedia.
"Natural selection is the process by which certain heritable traits—those that make it more likely for an organism to survive and successfully reproduce —become more common in a population over successive generations."
All your examples are talking about changes in individual organisms. Natural selection talks about changes over time of overall populations.
Really? This is the best you could do... a bunch of curse words and name-calling? Why do people have to act like such juveniles in this whole debate? And, I'm talking to BOTH sides.
You got modded down three times, but I have to agree with you. I was hoping to learn something from this video, but it's all "Admit you hate science". Very little content.
Twakius, as a person with less-than-exceptional hearing, I prefer an informational video that *at least* has subtitles. Ah, but the typesetter in me would like to turn you on to a tip: All-caps text is much harder to read than mixed-case text. This has to do with the way our brains use the shape of the word as well as the letter sequence. (Of course! why do you think most used car lots, etc, use all-caps and gray-colored text for the fine print on the backs of their contracts?)
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21For even though they knew God, they did not [c]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became (AO)futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
THE BIBLE IS CLEAR MY FRIENDS THAT JESUS IS THE SOURCE OF CREATION OF PLANET EARTH NOT EVOLUTION ,WE DID EVOLVE FROM APES.
OK, I agree with you that the Bible says that. What evidence is there that the bible is correct? You might as well be saying that Dr. Seuss wrote a book that says that he created all life. There is just as much evidence to support both claims.
Saying that God sent you a vision or that you saw a sign or your prayers were answered or you witnessed a miracle does not qualify as valid evidence.
@MEDIUMZERO God can create wonderful pieces of fractal geometry through a little gravity and wind resistance. Why can't He create through evolution?
Do you take all the Bible says literally?
"Tremble before Him, all the earth! The world is firmly established; it cannot be moved." 1 Chronicles 16:30. There is your geocentrism. The Earth cannot be moved, says so right there. Also puts a dampener on plate tectonics... don't tell the people in Hatti that earthquakes don't happen.
@pokemonlova99 if your not joking, just go look at the definition and let me remind you that it was a creationist that first classified us as apes, it was linnaeus
More "Missing Link" Science Fiction - Ida (darwinius masillae)
Richard Kay, a paleontologist at Duke University said, There is NO phylogenetic analysis to support the claims, and the data is cherry-picked.
Callum Ross, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago said, Their claim that this specimen should be classified as haplorhine is UNSUPPORTABLE in light of modern methods of classification.
Revolutionary Fossil Fails to Dazzle Paleontologists
brought to you by the Lunatics in Lab coats who fabricated the Global Warming Hoax, ClimateGate. Once again runaway science manipulating data to support a bullshit theory.
... the same lunatics that brought us electricity. gravitational theory, molecular biology, treatments for drug resistant infections, and basicly every other modern invention. all where bullshit theories and never amounted to ANYTHING....
Scientists who are interested in joining the fictional field of Evolution Science. Qualified candidates need no science education & possess the following skills:
Most recent fraud, Ida was presented as the "missing link". Up until the last month, could still view the advanced preview videos of the incredible fossil of a highly publicized documentary. Problems arose when legitimate scientists reviewed the claims which were grossly unsupportable. Evolutionists constant presentation of Piltdown Man HOAX, pig's tooth, donkey bones, gerbil femurs ect, please excuse humanity for being a bit more gunshy then the Kennedy's, of Lying Lunatics in Lab Coats.
Next time you visit a Pharmacist or Doctor, take a look at the symbolism still in use. Both those professions still have remnant imagery from Medieval Witchcraft, Sorcery and Magik. Rockefeller Sr. practiced Witchcraft on the outskirts of town and then peddled his "Snake oil" town to town. He became quite wealthy when the Civil War broke out by selling "Snake Oil" as the primary medication used by both sides. Rockefellers have always been in the so-called Oil business.
Who cares about symbolism, it does not imply that the product using the symbolism has any of the same viewpoints or any of the same methods. You are such a closed minded idiot.
1/5. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
Evolution has not failled irrefutable evidence at all. There are other peices of evidence that are not just fossils, so shut up using the missing link arguement. Look up retro viruses - it shows our ancestry and connection with apes. Looks up cdk007 he has a good video on it in detail, it seems you NEED to look up these things as you have no education - just a stubborn creaionistr pathetic mind.
It is not the duty of science to defend the theory of evolution, and stick by it to the bitter end no matter which illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers. On the contrary, it is expected that scientists recognize the patently obvious impossibility of Darwin's pronouncements and predictions . . Let's cut the umbilical cord that tied us down to Darwin for such a long time. It is choking us and holding us back." LL Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (1985).
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact.' [Tahmisian called it] a tangled mishmash of guessing games and figure juggling." *Fresno Bee, August 20, 1959, p. 1-B, [quoting *T.N. Tahmisian, physiologist for the Atomic Energy Commission].
Wrong, please telll me what do you think evolution is: because i highgly doubt you have any clue. It is the creationists that are the con men, they have no facts or evidences and brainwash the masses, retarding the general population.
It's not a belief and it doesn't exist solely as an excuse to not believe in a god, you are clearly clueless. Also mutations are quite obviously fact. Ginger hair is a mutation, and if you feel there is no new information or something, look up nylonase - a bacteria that feeds on nylon, yet nylon has only existed 60 ~ years. You sir, are a moron.
@AForsakenHero mate nylonase is a classic example of evolutionists trying to create an evolutionary mutation where there isn't one. they FOUND that nylonase could feed on nylon. so!? just cos nylon is only 60 years old doesn't mean nylonase is.
@ferrel81 no that's exactly what it means. Nylonase can ONLY survive on nylon, and since that has only existed 60 years, nylonase can only have existed that long.
@AForsakenHero a beneficial mutation is not the same as a mutation that adds information. it's this kind of word manipulation and dogma that is wrongly used to convince people that evolution is fact. the fact is that evolution is demonstrably false and scientifically impossible.
@ferrel81 Lol you don't understand biology at all. Mutations are changes that change the "coding" of proteins. This change means that a different protein is made instead, and the end result is a change, addition or removal of a function to the organism. In this case it is the addition of the ability to "eat" nylon. To sum up: A mutation IS evolution, there isnt one kind that isnt and one that is lol. You could view this as new information or not in different ways, regardless of this..
@ferrel81 ..there is a new function and hence the organism has evolved/adapted/changed. You don't understand the topic and seem to be projecting this idea of dogma as you seem to refuse something very strongly without having any clue as to how it works. Typical, ignorant, arroagant, idiotic creationist please pick up a school book instead of one full of bullshit next time.
@AForsakenHero no... a beneficial mutation is any mutation that is beneficial to an organism in its given environment. an evolutionary mutation is one that adds information to the genome.
@ferrel81 please point me to a scientific journal that states that, otherwise stop talking bullshit that you've learnt off some non educated moron priest
@AForsakenHero I know genetic mutation exists, which is why there are over 800 types of dogs in this world. But has anyone ever seen a dog produce a non-dog? (I mean a chihuahua is a disgrace to its ferocious ancestors, but it's still a dog)
@NateLeePhillips i'll explain it in a sense that you can use that knowledge then. Dogs mutate and differ as you know. Eventually these variations of dogs will mutate, and offspring ( lets call it A ) will differ from offspring ( B ) of other dogs. Follow this over generations and the offsprings of offsprings and so on of the family tree of A will be very very different to B. Eventually they will differ so much ...
@NateLeePhillips ..that A will no longer will be able to reproduce viable offspring with B ( definition of species ). To sum up. You understand micro evolution. The variation within species. If lots of micro evolutions occur enough to make them unable to produce viable offspring the whole thing is macro evolution and they have become new species. Please lookup some evolution videos from actual biologists to find out more rather than being dogmatic and biased as you obviously dont understand it.
@AForsakenHero I understand it all right. However, your logic is flawed - "if lots of micro evolutions occur enough to make them unable to produce viable offspring the whole thing is macro evolution and they have become a new species." If they are unable to produce viable offspring, how is that the creation of a new species?
@NateLeePhillips Sorry i should be more clear. By that i mean unable to reproduce A with B. They can still reproduce A with A and B with B. It's just that they have become so different that they are seperate species. Meanwhile, if you look at ancestors of A and B they COULD reproduce viably. This shows evolution between species.
@ferrel81 Strictly speaking, you are correct. but you now need to state what would disprove your god theory. Scientists admit that fossil rabbits in the pre-cambrian(to give a trite example) would disprove evolution. How would you confirm (or disprove) your theory? or is it just an assertion?
@timrice666 it's not so much that evolution has been disproved, it's just that it has not actually been proven and yet it is taught as fact. the lack of a fossil of a confirmed transitional species, the origin of information and the irreducible complexity of the machinery in each living cell all suggest that evolution is so unlikely that belief in it is tantamount to a religion....
@ferrel81 That is not true. Evolution is a fact (even creationists accept that "micro" evolution happened). The theory of evolution by natural selection acting on random mutation of alleles is the best explanation of evolution and just like germ theory, the theory of rerlativity or quantum theory are taught as our best explanation. If it is true that there are no transitional fossis(there are) or id is correct, prove it through peer reviewed science. I wiill be converted instantly.
@timrice666 ...but what would be required to disprove the authenticity of the bible? that's an interesting question. i'll get back to you on that. i'll chew on it for a bit
@timrice666 no he's not correct. No information is actually added, it's always the same base pairs, and it's their order that changes and hence changes proteins and hence characteristics. All mutations are evolutionary, as they all cause a change which is the definition ( information is never added or removed only changed )
@timrice666 as for your main point, i agree with it and go one stop further. Never mind proving a god, prove YOUR SPECIFIC god, the one that has done specific events in specific ways.
@AForsakenHero A change in eating habits in a minor change, more having to do with the field of micro-evolution within a given strain(which exists), than with Macro- evolution, which is one thing becoming another. Sadly, the nylonase have not yet evolved into humans (bummer) they are still flavobacterium. How long has cheese whiz existed? did we evolve the ability to eat cheese whiz?
@theorv29 2 things. Macro evolution is the change from one species to another and HAS occured as nylonase is a new species. The second thing is that you alike to many creationsists misundestand this: Macro evolution is the change in species yes, but DOES NOT mean that they become completely different species. They simply change just enough to count as a new species, and still remain very similar to ( if you want to call it this ) the parent species. I will continue on an added post:
@theorv29 flavobacterium is not a species it is a group in which all species within are called. E.G. humans are part of the taxonomic group greater apes. Finally: We could always digest cheese whiz, we use the same methods we do for other foods as it works. However with nylonase a specific enzyme is needed to break it down. The species that break it down ONLY break down nylon and could not have existed without it. So either a bacterium evolved to gain this ability or evolved to lose all others.
@AForsakenHero A change in eating habits in a minor change, more having to do with the field of micro-evolution within a given strain(which exists), than with Macro- evolution, which is one thing becoming another. Sadly, the nylonase have not yet evolved into humans (bummer) they are still flavobacterium. How long has cheese whiz existed? did we evolve the ability to eat cheese whiz?
@waketheoblivious evolution is a fact, animals and plants do change over time, the theory explain the massive and yes fucking massive amount of facts and put them into a model, you know, like germ theory, heliocentric, round earth, atomic all theories get out of your little bubble of illusional reality and wake up to the REAL world
A leading established authority within the Science Community made this observation:
"Evolution is baseless and quite incredible." *Ambrose Flemming, president, British Association for Advancement of Science, in The Unleashing of Evolutionary Thought.
"It is not the duty of science to defend the theory of evolution, and stick by it to the bitter end no matter which illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers. On the contrary, it is expected that scientists recognize the patently obvious impossibility of Darwin's pronouncements and predictions . . Let's cut the umbilical cord that tied us down to Darwin for such a long time. It is choking us and holding us back." LL Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (1985).
Evolutionists, assemble thoughts to argue the existence of their mind. Vehemently argue they have one. Followed by, arguing because they can't see or touch God, He doesn't exist. Then they attempt to rationalize and justify their Satanic insanity.
Evolutionists having to rationalize and justify the Lies and Fraud associated with the Theory of Evolution, reveal themselves to be Frauds and Liars.
The history of the universe, has mountains of discourse. Lost momentum, lost leaps of Faith, the keys of such, to Heaven's Gate. So go the men of Great Renown, replaced by manufactured clowns. Satanic science of toys for boys and smokes for the big folks. Step right up, don't be lazy, evolution thrives on Hazy. School board objections, to punctuated ethics, & fraudulent missing links of a HOAX. Nazi Buzzards Squawk & Spew the Science of Satanic Indignation. Denying the Truth of God's Creation
Live and let live. If the creationists want to take everything in the Bible literally, let them do so. Calling others ignorant or worse just reflectts badly on you. The only problem comes when creationism or intelligent design gets taught in Science class.
2/4. Science was rewarded with credibility based on the adopting the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Rather then acknowledge the role the truth played, Science ignores the truth and abandoned their commitment. Credibility eroded as science began to rationalize and justify irrational behavior. Science slid to practice deception and conditioned humanity to follow suit. Ignoring the standard established to gain credibility, science replaced "irrefutable evidence" with "plausible bullshit".
1/4. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
Ida (darwinius masillae), was the most recent attempt by evolutionists to provide the "missing link". In the entire history of this theory, it has never provided a legitimate missing link that legitimately met the historical standard of "irrefutable evidence". Adopted by science to distance itself from Medieval Sorcery/Witchcraft. Today, Pharmaceutical/Medical Industries still employ remnants of Medieval Witchcraft imagery.
"Orce man, discovered in the southern Spanish town of Orce. In 1982, hailed as the "oldest fossilized human remains ever found in Europe". One year later officials admitted the skull fragment was not human, but probably from a 4 mo. old donkey. Scientists had said the skull belonged to a 17 year old man, who lived 900,000 - 1.6 million years ago. They even had detailed drawings done to represent what he would have looked like. Reminiscent of 1922, Nebraska Man fraud."
They been teaching the bullshit theory for 100 years as fact and the fact is they still have no "irrefutable evidence". Just a hoax followed by constant presentations of another fraud as the "missing link". Pathetic disregard for ethics and integrity and the typical Nazi response is Satanic Indignation when faced with the truth, Where is the "missing link"? Teaching fraud as fact, bullshit.
I have ALREADY told you,evolution doesn't predict any missing link as it would disprove evolution. The major support for evolution comes from the DNA.
Well where the Hell were you in 1913 when the manufactured Piltdown Man was presented as the "missing link" that could satisfy the historical standard of "irrefutable evidence" and allow this fraud to be taught as fact for 40 years until it was revealed and then another 60 and still no "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as fact. Cut with the bullshit. You are supporting a Satanic Fraud to be taught as fact. Either meet the standard or STFU
Go ahead profess the theory of evolution with all it's Hoax and fraud history and claim to be an honest man with integrity. Who are you expecting to consider your opinion besides egotistical pathological liars, genocidal maniacs and serial killers?
That if people maintain themselves to be honest, with ethics and integrity it is impossible to claim those attributes and support this theory. Science can accommodate Lie you die technology so why not strap politicians in an electric chair wired to a lie detector and start asking question. Unwilling to submit to that monthly get out of politics. Going to maintain have irrefutable evidence, sit in the chair and prove it. Submit a fraud as the missing link pay with their life.
None of our modern understanding of biology makes any sense at all except for in the context of evolution. The theory of evolution fully explains the diversity and tenacity of life on earth, and is not contradicted by any current scientific thorry.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Humans also share the same ratio of chromosomes with tobacco plants. How does that prove we evolved from apes? It's an interesting factoid... I'll give you that. But, it is not conclusive evidence.
the number doesn't matter (well it does) but it's the size & composition of the chromosomes that rly matters.
Also, humans have 46 chromosomes, and all others great apes have 48. Why's that? Because one of our chromosomes got fussed. How do we know? There's telomeres(which r the ends of a chromosome) in the middle of our #2 chromosome, where it's not supposed to be. And that fused part of our chromosome is identical to Ape chromosome #11 (the 1 we're "missing").
@daveyjazz72 who says "Humans also share the same ratio of chromosomes with tobacco plants."
What exactly is a "ratio of chromosomes"? Your argument (like those of most creationists) makes absolutely no sense. A "ratio" is a comparison of two different things. Like the ratio of real scientists to creation scientists is about 10,000 to 1.
One interesting supplement to my "ratio" of creation scientists to real scientists.
Cretinists like to list scientists who were also creationists. Most have about 1000 names, mostly by listing scientists who lived before Darwin published his theory or scientists in fields unrelated to evolution.
Lets put that in perspective. "Project Steve" (google it) lists more scientists than that who believe in evolutionary theory ... all named Steve.
@daveyjazz72 your right, but its not only the similarities its the pattern of them that make a phylogenetic tree. you may want to look some of this up PLEASE
some great inforamtion here thanks
thejameskan 5 days ago
really informative and interesting
smuggecko 6 days ago
great video thanks
prchecker 6 days ago
Ham says we didnt come from apes but he looks just like one.
TheEarthFirst 1 month ago
y do ppl get so mad wen they hear about god or anything in that topic ?? as they say truth hurts !! in god i trust.. Amen
MrMightyMagpie 3 months ago
@Himeslnu do u have a list of proof for evolution, id like to prove you wrong:D
draco4813531415 5 months ago
haha evolutionists are so ignorant(:
draco4813531415 5 months ago
@draco4813531415 oh man this gave me a good laugh, thanks i needed that.
bred321 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at my Channel to see the real Garden of Eden. I'm the one who found it. It's location is in the Northwest section of Iran, not where everyone else is telling you to look.
downyourtube 6 months ago
Comment removed
PureAirSolutions 6 months ago
Creationists are just so.........unevolved. They say they ain't descended from monkeys but at least monkeys try to faithfully interpret their environment and which must put monkeys on a far higher rung of the evolutionary ladder? The mindless believers are are just to be felt sorry for but the priests and apologists are the ones need disembowelling and be strangled with their own guts, the disingenuous cunts!
Rockster969 6 months ago
That "book" as you call it is GODS word!! The dark ages were cause by the Roman Catholics take over and people didnt learn from or understand the Bible. Science is not evolution! Science is a study of the way things work. I dont have to believe evolution to know how light bulbs or cars work. I'm all for science, but I'm not for evolution. We both believe what we believe by faith because neither one of us was there. But its obvious only one way can be right! God said it and I believe His word.
cwz32710 7 months ago
@cwz32710 And this is why "you weren't there" is a horrible argument
scienceblogs(DOT)com/pharyngula/2011/06/dear_emma_b.php
roont 6 months ago
Pople that believe that creation is true also believe science is true! The Bible is full of science! Check your history it was falling away from the Bible that lead to the dark ages. Evolution has no base in science but is a therory!! One that is clearly not true!! God created in six literal days.
cwz32710 7 months ago
@cwz32710 Explain your reasoning. Please. First off, every creationist I've talked to says science, mostly evolution, is a joke. Second, the Dark Ages were caused by the Christians taking over because they censored all scientific advancement. Evolution is backed by science 100%. Just because it doesn't say how life was created proves nothing. In fact, evolution isn't a theory on how life was created so it wouldn't. And "God created in six literal days" has no true backing but a book.
HimesInu 7 months ago
@cwz32710 "Pople that believe that creation is true also believe science is true"
No, you don't. Because science has definitively proven that the earth is 4.6 billion years old and that "miracles" are impossible.
roont 7 months ago
What is this proof?
cwz32710 6 months ago
@cwz32710 talkorigins(DOT)org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html
roont 6 months ago
@roont The impacts prove old earth. And the craters up to and over 200km diam. A soil volume moved is 150,000 to nearly half a million cubic kms (depending on depth). How many nuclear bombs would be required to do this? Billions of years explains why we are here but they put all the large impacts in the flood. As well as all the others, there are two confirmed impact craters larger than 200 km! Knowing how much soil excavated, how come anything survived (except a few microbes). No cr can answer
Justwantahover 2 weeks ago
@cwz32710 Thee are a dozen confirmed impact craters (by iridium and other rare substances arond the rim) that are over 50 km diam on earth. Some are over 100 km diam, some around 200 km and over! The amount of soil and rock moved by a 200 km crater impact would be over 200,000 CUBIC KMs! How much energy required to do this in an instant! This is just ONE impact and there were many more. Billions of years explains why we are here but u put them all in the flood. How did any thing survive?
Justwantahover 2 weeks ago
Another Athiest prick who thinks life evolved from gas!! hahahaha you guys are funny
prophecy217 9 months ago
@prophecy217
Another christian moron who thinks life came from a magic space daddy who wrote a bronze age book that is so vague, filled continuity errors and logical fallacies out the wazoo, horrible contradictions and atrocities.
radioactiveego 9 months ago
@radioactiveego Fail. Just because I think the idea of life evolving from gas is absurd, doesnt mean I believe in the bible or a sky daddy. Dont be so quick to jump to conclusions, and there is no point attacking the bible when your religion is allso based on no evidence. You need to quit with the origin of life, its unknown and always will be. Keep in mind, there is just as much evidence for god as there is against= NONE!!!...
prophecy217 9 months ago
@prophecy217
There is no evidence for god you idiot. If there is, prove it. People have been saying there is a god for thousands of years. The only problem is, there is no prove of any god ever existing..
And you're being a hypocrite over your 'ont be so quick to jump to conclusions' statement. The bible is getting attacked because it's full of nonsense. I am sorry your god didn't give you high enough IQs to know what is reality and what is fantasy.
radioactiveego 9 months ago
@radioactiveego "There is no evidence for god you idiot" did I say there was? eeerrrrr.....NO. I said there is just as much evidence for god as there is against, NONE!!! Your waisting your breath ripping religion, you could debunk all religions. Would that disprove a deity??...eeerrrr..NO. "I am sorry your god didnt give you a big enough IQ" my god? jumping to conlusions again are we?. Agnostic actually, because I know in "reality" we dont know if god is or isnt.
prophecy217 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@prophecy217
That's the problem. There is not one shred of evidence at all..
radioactiveego 9 months ago
@radioactiveego I suppose gas evolving into man, planets crashing into eachother and forming moons out of the earths crust is reality? I suppose you would say life from non life is reality, ASSHOLE. to say the least. there is no proof god made man, there is no proof man made himself...like i said earlier, drop the religions...athiests belief in planet formation by faith, theists believe in planet creation by faith...fuck all proof for either....all guess work and imagination..keep defending it.
prophecy217 9 months ago
@prophecy217 HAHAHAHAHA omg! you are sooo stupid! your scientific knowledge is that of a 3rd grader. actually let me take that back, i don't want to insult elementary kids. Seriously though dude, read a science book and quit it with the absurd strawmans, atheism requires no faith (it is the default position), we have evidence of how planets form, we see planets forming around other stars light years away, through natural processes. Why do people laugh at creationists is a good series to watch.
caddy38 9 months ago
The prick who put this video on YouTube should watch the video of how Darwin enfluenced the Communist and Nazis that brought misery, destruction and death to millions. The stunted moronic neanderthals who believe in evolution will be in the hottest part of hell with other like minded Darwinist-Hitler, Marx, Lenin, Moa Zedong and Stalin.
stagn41 10 months ago
@stagn41 : Where did you get the information ? I bet you watched "Ben Stein's" propaganda film "No intelligence allowed" Learn to think for yourself.. you are a danger to society with your lack of intelligence... god is the biggest serial killer of all time. Just read the bible.... according to the bible god has killed more nations of people than anyone else in the history of the world...."god= mass murderer"
Hitler was baptized as a Catholic !!!
christianjerk666 10 months ago
@stagn41 lol. obvious troll is obvious. you're talking about eugenics. not evolution.
roont 6 months ago
If these morons would invest even HALF of their money, (not OURS), in education--we would all be better off and these peabrains might be able to evolve along with the rest of us.
jlsr1000 1 year ago
A well deserved "honor" I'd say, even considering the strong competition Ham has for the title! And then consider how many people have visited this so-called museum, while actual museums that teach real science have been forced to close for lack of funds.
SuperImready 1 year ago
Two hands working does a lot more than a thousand clasped in prayer.
TheGreatRL 1 year ago
This why people laugh at creationists. Which is also a great video series for those who didn't know...
johnjhuff 1 year ago
so go ahead & spread ur propaganda 2 the rest of the sheeple. but I'm not buying it, and I hope that many people who read my posts reconsider what they were brainwashd 2 believe in and start reading the bible. U r digging ur own grave buddy
STRGATE7 1 year ago
I'm by all means NOT "holier than thou". but I hav common logical sense 2 believe that all men on this earth originate from Adam and Eve. That evolution is a man-made concept. and... the dinosaurs existed alongside w/ mankind. Many ancient artifacts prove this. Yet, most people won't believe in creationism, bcuz otherwise, they'll hav 2 come 2 terms w/ a Personal Force who holds them accountable 4 how they lived their lives!
STRGATE7 1 year ago
@STRGATE7 Common logical sense... an invisible, intangible entity/concept created a man from mud and a woman from his rib and some more mud? Sounds like common sense to me. I'm assuming that you're a grown adult, which demonstrates how this indoctrination process and belief system can override logic and reason for a lifetime. It must be stopped.
johnjhuff 1 year ago
@johnjhuff tru indocrination/brainwashing of the world is getting people 2 believe we evolved from apes, that dinosaurs only existd millions of yrs b4 humans, and the big bang. they r all speculations, since none of them can b proven by hard science. there is no "missing link", the "fossils in rock layers" theory involves circular reasoning, and no big bang-an explosion of matter from nothing is impossibl. whats the source of energy that would create the big bang?
STRGATE7 1 year ago
@STRGATE7 I'm not going to waste too much time on someone who hasn't evolved from childhood mentality, but if you care to, you can look up transitional fossils on a search engine and see what all of that 'speculation' is about. Are you denying the existence of fossils? The Big Bang makes less sense to you than "god" did it? So "god" created energy. Let's tell the scientists to bring a halt to their research on that matter, and all research, actually. "god" did it. FAIL
johnjhuff 1 year ago
@johnjhuff go ahead, u lost, come up w/ any & all kinds of justifications, excuses, and programmed opinion. "denying the existance of fossils" I said? Not only r u programmed 2 believe lies, but apparently, ur also illiterate. The truly enlightened 1s kno better than 2 believe in the world system's lies. But I won't bother 2 argue w/ u anymore.
BTW the big bang: something created from nothing equals nothing. I guess ur not smart enough 2 grasp the theory of relativety
STRGATE7 1 year ago
@STRGATE7 No, I won. I'm an agnostic, and so is everyone else by definition. Apparently, you're not smart enough to spell at a third grade level, so much for enlightenment.
Also, stop using our terms for beLIEvers - sheeple, indoctrinated/brainwashed, circular reasoning... That is you, the ones who believe in utter nonsense and cannot think for yourselves. Examine your beliefs, I'm sure you won't, but you would be embarrassed if you actually did. It's alchemy.
johnjhuff 1 year ago
@johnjhuff sir, I took the liberty 2 view ur channel, and I must say, u r 1 depraved tormented and sexually confused individual! so much so that I cannot hate u. instead, I will pray 4 u 2nite. I'll pray 2 Jesus that He alleviates the insiduous agnostic homosexual cancer that's eating away ur mind. Hopefully, u can change ur ways or at least quell ur insanity 4 the sake of not corrupting any more young people.
STRGATE7 1 year ago
@STRGATE7 The only corruption going on is between the "christians" and the children whose minds they're poisoning.
I like good music and comedy. I like trying to make people examine their ridiculous beliefs, and to drop their bigotry. I'm sorry that you don't appreciate my video collection.
Please don't pray for me, I'd prefer some tangible action. However, if you'd like to mumble into the air, or out loud to an invisible, man-made concept, please feel free.
johnjhuff 1 year ago
@STRGATE7 So if the big bang was created by something, who created that something that created the big bang?
TheGreatRL 1 year ago
@TheGreatRL why don't u research Einstein's theory of relativety? (E=mc2)
Once u break it down, the theory concludes that matter and energy are mutual. Any type of matter can only b made by energy, and energy must come from some form of matter. The big bang relies on the premise that a pinpoint of matter suddenly explodes into this vast universe. But some intelligent force of energy had to have guided the creation of a universe that is so harmonious and in-sync.
STRGATE7 1 year ago
@TheGreatRL u might ask: if God is energy, then what did God come from? Its been proven that energy never dies, and it always existd. Energy is all around u, and latent potential energy exists in matter. But we'll never know why the intelligent God is infinite, we'll only know after we die. That might not make sense 2 u, but it should make more sense than an intricet universe created from nothing
STRGATE7 1 year ago
@STRGATE7 Being created from nothing is not that farfetched from saying that something with no proof of existence created everything. If I told you Zeus or Apollo created everything, you would probably think i'm crazy. But why? Why is this any different than God?
TheGreatRL 1 year ago
the reason why u call ken ham "prick of the week" is bcuz u don't want 2 face the TRUTH. the truth is is that God created man and all the animals of the earth (including what the brainwashd and bought paleotologists call "dinosaurs") in a short span of time, not in the course of millions of yrs apart. Ultimately, Darwin's satan-inspired theories of evolution r still unproven, but yet- public schools, system-run universities... hammer the "truth" into the ungodly youth...
STRGATE7 1 year ago
Halleluya! Halleluya, praise be! Glory, glory, halleluya, praise, praise be!
electronfun 1 year ago
Prick of the week? I know formally nominated him for prick of the century. Along with Kent Hovind. And Pat Robertson. Oh, and Jerry Falwell. And... well, you get the point...
Hornadayfan 1 year ago
To Ken Ham:
Nice beard dickhead
MrReasonFTW 1 year ago 2
@MrReasonFTW ....Ken Ham has an unusual beard, therefore the Bible must be inaccurate, right?
Laylow4now 8 months ago
@Laylow4now No I'm just making fun of his beard.
MrReasonFTW 8 months ago
Bad language. It's unsightly.
bornbythesea 1 year ago
Gotta admit, this video was pretty disappointing. I am a Creationist, but have respect for those who disagree with me, but I can tell that a majority of the respect Creationists show for post modern secular humanists and evolution scientists isn't reciprocated. I clicked on this video because I wanted to see the scientific arguments you had against Ken's Creationist teachings, and found none.
tHeEtHmAn18 1 year ago
Wow, your are so dumb. You are really dumb. For real. Haha. Ken Ham is gonna be blessed by God tremendously. All the attacks he's receiving is from satan who doesn't want you to know the truth.
bikerboy9487 1 year ago
do you even have evidence that proves that ken ham is what you call a "prick"? after all you played absolutely nothing that you believe backs up why you think that way... nothing he said, did, nothing!
bearclawkev 1 year ago
"Ads by google: Learn God`s Word"
Irony on a base level, but I like it
BillHicks420 1 year ago
I'd watch my words a little more carefully if I were you sir, God doesn't take lightly to mockers of his word and works.
Oh yeah, keep listening to nirvana, what a role model you have in kurt instead of Jesus.
roodyhoo 1 year ago
@roodyhoo
You're thinking of the old testament. Get your head out of the past and look to the futre instead of rovelling in fear of damnation just because a 2000 year old relic said so.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
@roodyhoo What does God have to do with Ken Ham? Other than Mr. Ham using God as window dressing to fleece Christians out of their money.
And if we're going to talk about His word and works, why does everything we see in the world (His work) disagree with the Bible (His word)? Odd that.
And another thing: It doesn't matter if someone watches what they say. God knows what's in their hearts. God knows what you are thinking. Not saying something does not keep God from knowing you're thinking it.
rrward 1 year ago
Creationist Prick Of The Week? Nah...Creationist Prick of the Millenium!
jackalmate 1 year ago
dude you are generous. a "little" confused? those cats are bat shit crazy deluded.
AryannaDeSade 1 year ago
That's beacuse gawwwd hid your microphone. jeeeezuuuz told me that. he sayeth , I will smote (smite?) his microphone and it shall be lost. For lo, this man does speak against my holy genetic defender. say ahhhmen, and send me a bazillion dollars so my ministry can continue it's war on rational logical thought while i tool about in a Jaguar, a BMW and a Lexus. Say hallelujah
AryannaDeSade 1 year ago
@AryannaDeSade Why not aim higher? Go for a Maybach and a Bugatti Veyron. That's what God wants you drive, I am sure.
dragonfan1981 1 year ago
TURN TO CHAPTER 40, IN VERSE 15 WE'RE TOLD! holy shit that is the most rocking song I've ever heard, I almost headbanged my brain out. where can I dl it? is there a black or death metal version?
mun090 1 year ago
What do you mean no scientific evidence, haven't you read the bible? it's right there! jeeze
All I can say is thank god (haha) this clown is not progagating this crap in my country.......although, he is orignially from Australia.
YOUR NOT WELCOME BACK HAMMY!!!!!
tmiddled 1 year ago
@tmiddled
How much can we pay you to take him back? We can throw in Mel Gibson (he's kinda Australian)!
tctheunbeliever 1 year ago
The King James translators were aware of the Hippo and Crocodile, why didn't they just say that then instead of "Behemoth" and "Leviathan"? You say evolution is fact because change happens...You are trying to "prove" a theory with facts that are irrelevant. If you want to say evolution is a FACT then prove SCIENTIFICALLY with repeated test and observation how life came from non-life or how matter came to be by itself. That is required for evolution to be true matter came from nothing... amen
AsaphProject 1 year ago
@AsaphProject Evolution has been observed in nature and in the lab.
Darwin wrote, Origin of Species, NOT origin of life, not the origin of matter and space-time. You are trying to "un-prove" a theory with facts that are irrelevant.
RAmen
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz The only thing that has ever been observed is variation within a kind. There are limits to mutations and change, bugs can become immune to bug spray but can they become resistant to a sledge hammer? Pigs can be gentically altered to grow larger, but will they grow to be as big as a mountain? If limitless evolution is true they should, but I doubt it. I also find it hard to have a species without first having life. Factually, how did life begin in an evolutionary model?
AsaphProject 1 year ago
@AsaphProject Wrong, evolution has been documented in nature and in the lab.
You can't make a pig as big as a mountain so variation in species is wrong, LOL.
Watch Dogs don't make non dogs on my home page.
.
Darwin wrote, ORIGIN OF SPECIES, not origin of life.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The science vs creationism debate was over long ago. Science has mountains of evidence to support it, creationism has none at all. QED.
Ozzyman200 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The science vs creationism debate was over long ago. Science has mountains of evidence to support it, creationism has none at all. QED.
Ozzyman200 1 year ago
Behemoth is the hippopotamus; Leviathan is the crocodile.
ChurchOfKali66619 1 year ago
What is Evolution actually?... Lets get an accurate specific interpretation of "Natural Selection"... When a person dies, is that natural selection,?. When a cat eats a mouse, is that Natural selection?. When a nomad family travels through the dessert and their skins pigment gets darker, is that Natural selection?. When a bacteria adapts to the medicine used to kill it, is that natural selection?. When a healthy child is born, is that Natural selection?.
KahbyK 1 year ago
@KahbyK who says "What is evolution actually?" Then asks a bunch of questions and says "Is that Natural Selection".
Just so you know, the answer to all of your questions is "no, that is not an example of natural selection".
I suggest you read a gradeschool biology textbook.
wysiwyg666 1 year ago
@KahbyK
Or, you could just look at the first paragraph on Natural Selection on Wikipedia.
"Natural selection is the process by which certain heritable traits—those that make it more likely for an organism to survive and successfully reproduce —become more common in a population over successive generations."
All your examples are talking about changes in individual organisms. Natural selection talks about changes over time of overall populations.
wysiwyg666 1 year ago
LOL Poll creator FAILS.
dougmoerhoffman 1 year ago
wow these evolutionists are running scared now all they can do is ridicule. lol.
MrJetco 1 year ago
@MrJetco
I wonder if the reason jetco's account is closed is cos he is just a spammer. Although Waketheoblivious is a far worse offender than Jetco.
ozowen 1 year ago
why even make the vid if you can't find your mic... find it... buy a new one, then make the vid.
CyberNeticRodent 1 year ago
Really? This is the best you could do... a bunch of curse words and name-calling? Why do people have to act like such juveniles in this whole debate? And, I'm talking to BOTH sides.
daveyjazz72 2 years ago
You got modded down three times, but I have to agree with you. I was hoping to learn something from this video, but it's all "Admit you hate science". Very little content.
Kudo's for the silly song, though.
laflugantabastardo 1 year ago
Twakius, as a person with less-than-exceptional hearing, I prefer an informational video that *at least* has subtitles. Ah, but the typesetter in me would like to turn you on to a tip: All-caps text is much harder to read than mixed-case text. This has to do with the way our brains use the shape of the word as well as the letter sequence. (Of course! why do you think most used car lots, etc, use all-caps and gray-colored text for the fine print on the backs of their contracts?)
cliffwalkinfool 2 years ago
For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21For even though they knew God, they did not [c]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became (AO)futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
THE BIBLE IS CLEAR MY FRIENDS THAT JESUS IS THE SOURCE OF CREATION OF PLANET EARTH NOT EVOLUTION ,WE DID EVOLVE FROM APES.
MEDIUMZERO 2 years ago
OK, I agree with you that the Bible says that. What evidence is there that the bible is correct? You might as well be saying that Dr. Seuss wrote a book that says that he created all life. There is just as much evidence to support both claims.
Saying that God sent you a vision or that you saw a sign or your prayers were answered or you witnessed a miracle does not qualify as valid evidence.
appledroplarry 2 years ago
@MEDIUMZERO God can create wonderful pieces of fractal geometry through a little gravity and wind resistance. Why can't He create through evolution?
Do you take all the Bible says literally?
"Tremble before Him, all the earth! The world is firmly established; it cannot be moved." 1 Chronicles 16:30. There is your geocentrism. The Earth cannot be moved, says so right there. Also puts a dampener on plate tectonics... don't tell the people in Hatti that earthquakes don't happen.
KPhysicsGeek 2 years ago 5
@MEDIUMZERO
Actually the Bible doesn't address this issue at all.
ozowen 1 year ago
@MEDIUMZERO we are apes get the fuck over it. right now go look up the definition of APE then you cannot say that we arnt apes
patrickledford420 1 year ago
@patrickledford420 dude we are not apes ok we are human beings created in the immage of God.
pokemonlova99 1 year ago
@pokemonlova99 if your not joking, just go look at the definition and let me remind you that it was a creationist that first classified us as apes, it was linnaeus
patrickledford420 1 year ago
More "Missing Link" Science Fiction - Ida (darwinius masillae)
Richard Kay, a paleontologist at Duke University said, There is NO phylogenetic analysis to support the claims, and the data is cherry-picked.
Callum Ross, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago said, Their claim that this specimen should be classified as haplorhine is UNSUPPORTABLE in light of modern methods of classification.
Revolutionary Fossil Fails to Dazzle Paleontologists
Ann Gibbons, ScienceNOW, May 19, 2009
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
brought to you by the Lunatics in Lab coats who fabricated the Global Warming Hoax, ClimateGate. Once again runaway science manipulating data to support a bullshit theory.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
... the same lunatics that brought us electricity. gravitational theory, molecular biology, treatments for drug resistant infections, and basicly every other modern invention. all where bullshit theories and never amounted to ANYTHING....
Jpark8283 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HELP WANTED:
Scientists who are interested in joining the fictional field of Evolution Science. Qualified candidates need no science education & possess the following skills:
Taxidermy, Donkey Kong, Silly Putty, Cosmetology, Sorcery, Hoaxes, Pathological Liars, WitchCraft, Distort Facts, Egotistical, Genocidal Maniacs, Nazi Mentality, Evil, Hypocrisy, Crippled Ethics, Lost Credibility, Medieval Magic, Rationalize & Justify Lies, Insanity, ClimateGate, Diabolical Deception, Satanic Worship
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Most recent fraud, Ida was presented as the "missing link". Up until the last month, could still view the advanced preview videos of the incredible fossil of a highly publicized documentary. Problems arose when legitimate scientists reviewed the claims which were grossly unsupportable. Evolutionists constant presentation of Piltdown Man HOAX, pig's tooth, donkey bones, gerbil femurs ect, please excuse humanity for being a bit more gunshy then the Kennedy's, of Lying Lunatics in Lab Coats.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Next time you visit a Pharmacist or Doctor, take a look at the symbolism still in use. Both those professions still have remnant imagery from Medieval Witchcraft, Sorcery and Magik. Rockefeller Sr. practiced Witchcraft on the outskirts of town and then peddled his "Snake oil" town to town. He became quite wealthy when the Civil War broke out by selling "Snake Oil" as the primary medication used by both sides. Rockefellers have always been in the so-called Oil business.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Who cares about symbolism, it does not imply that the product using the symbolism has any of the same viewpoints or any of the same methods. You are such a closed minded idiot.
AForsakenHero 2 years ago
1/5. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Evolution has not failled irrefutable evidence at all. There are other peices of evidence that are not just fossils, so shut up using the missing link arguement. Look up retro viruses - it shows our ancestry and connection with apes. Looks up cdk007 he has a good video on it in detail, it seems you NEED to look up these things as you have no education - just a stubborn creaionistr pathetic mind.
AForsakenHero 2 years ago
@AForsakenHero
It is not the duty of science to defend the theory of evolution, and stick by it to the bitter end no matter which illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers. On the contrary, it is expected that scientists recognize the patently obvious impossibility of Darwin's pronouncements and predictions . . Let's cut the umbilical cord that tied us down to Darwin for such a long time. It is choking us and holding us back." LL Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (1985).
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@AForsakenHero
"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact.' [Tahmisian called it] a tangled mishmash of guessing games and figure juggling." *Fresno Bee, August 20, 1959, p. 1-B, [quoting *T.N. Tahmisian, physiologist for the Atomic Energy Commission].
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Wrong, please telll me what do you think evolution is: because i highgly doubt you have any clue. It is the creationists that are the con men, they have no facts or evidences and brainwash the masses, retarding the general population.
AForsakenHero 2 years ago 2
@AForsakenHero
Evolution: the belief in Miraculous Mutations to discount Miraculous Creation.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
It's not a belief and it doesn't exist solely as an excuse to not believe in a god, you are clearly clueless. Also mutations are quite obviously fact. Ginger hair is a mutation, and if you feel there is no new information or something, look up nylonase - a bacteria that feeds on nylon, yet nylon has only existed 60 ~ years. You sir, are a moron.
AForsakenHero 2 years ago 11
@AForsakenHero mate nylonase is a classic example of evolutionists trying to create an evolutionary mutation where there isn't one. they FOUND that nylonase could feed on nylon. so!? just cos nylon is only 60 years old doesn't mean nylonase is.
ferrel81 1 year ago
@ferrel81 no that's exactly what it means. Nylonase can ONLY survive on nylon, and since that has only existed 60 years, nylonase can only have existed that long.
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@AForsakenHero a beneficial mutation is not the same as a mutation that adds information. it's this kind of word manipulation and dogma that is wrongly used to convince people that evolution is fact. the fact is that evolution is demonstrably false and scientifically impossible.
ferrel81 1 year ago
@ferrel81 Lol you don't understand biology at all. Mutations are changes that change the "coding" of proteins. This change means that a different protein is made instead, and the end result is a change, addition or removal of a function to the organism. In this case it is the addition of the ability to "eat" nylon. To sum up: A mutation IS evolution, there isnt one kind that isnt and one that is lol. You could view this as new information or not in different ways, regardless of this..
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@ferrel81 ..there is a new function and hence the organism has evolved/adapted/changed. You don't understand the topic and seem to be projecting this idea of dogma as you seem to refuse something very strongly without having any clue as to how it works. Typical, ignorant, arroagant, idiotic creationist please pick up a school book instead of one full of bullshit next time.
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@AForsakenHero no... a beneficial mutation is any mutation that is beneficial to an organism in its given environment. an evolutionary mutation is one that adds information to the genome.
ferrel81 1 year ago
@ferrel81 please point me to a scientific journal that states that, otherwise stop talking bullshit that you've learnt off some non educated moron priest
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@AForsakenHero I know genetic mutation exists, which is why there are over 800 types of dogs in this world. But has anyone ever seen a dog produce a non-dog? (I mean a chihuahua is a disgrace to its ferocious ancestors, but it's still a dog)
NateLeePhillips 1 year ago
@NateLeePhillips i'll explain it in a sense that you can use that knowledge then. Dogs mutate and differ as you know. Eventually these variations of dogs will mutate, and offspring ( lets call it A ) will differ from offspring ( B ) of other dogs. Follow this over generations and the offsprings of offsprings and so on of the family tree of A will be very very different to B. Eventually they will differ so much ...
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@NateLeePhillips ..that A will no longer will be able to reproduce viable offspring with B ( definition of species ). To sum up. You understand micro evolution. The variation within species. If lots of micro evolutions occur enough to make them unable to produce viable offspring the whole thing is macro evolution and they have become new species. Please lookup some evolution videos from actual biologists to find out more rather than being dogmatic and biased as you obviously dont understand it.
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@AForsakenHero I understand it all right. However, your logic is flawed - "if lots of micro evolutions occur enough to make them unable to produce viable offspring the whole thing is macro evolution and they have become a new species." If they are unable to produce viable offspring, how is that the creation of a new species?
NateLeePhillips 1 year ago
@NateLeePhillips Sorry i should be more clear. By that i mean unable to reproduce A with B. They can still reproduce A with A and B with B. It's just that they have become so different that they are seperate species. Meanwhile, if you look at ancestors of A and B they COULD reproduce viably. This shows evolution between species.
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@ferrel81 Strictly speaking, you are correct. but you now need to state what would disprove your god theory. Scientists admit that fossil rabbits in the pre-cambrian(to give a trite example) would disprove evolution. How would you confirm (or disprove) your theory? or is it just an assertion?
timrice666 1 year ago
@timrice666 it's not so much that evolution has been disproved, it's just that it has not actually been proven and yet it is taught as fact. the lack of a fossil of a confirmed transitional species, the origin of information and the irreducible complexity of the machinery in each living cell all suggest that evolution is so unlikely that belief in it is tantamount to a religion....
ferrel81 1 year ago
@ferrel81 That is not true. Evolution is a fact (even creationists accept that "micro" evolution happened). The theory of evolution by natural selection acting on random mutation of alleles is the best explanation of evolution and just like germ theory, the theory of rerlativity or quantum theory are taught as our best explanation. If it is true that there are no transitional fossis(there are) or id is correct, prove it through peer reviewed science. I wiill be converted instantly.
timrice666 1 year ago 2
@timrice666 ...but what would be required to disprove the authenticity of the bible? that's an interesting question. i'll get back to you on that. i'll chew on it for a bit
ferrel81 1 year ago
@timrice666 no he's not correct. No information is actually added, it's always the same base pairs, and it's their order that changes and hence changes proteins and hence characteristics. All mutations are evolutionary, as they all cause a change which is the definition ( information is never added or removed only changed )
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@timrice666 as for your main point, i agree with it and go one stop further. Never mind proving a god, prove YOUR SPECIFIC god, the one that has done specific events in specific ways.
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@AForsakenHero that would be called adaptation moron.
OfficialAtramental 1 year ago
@OfficialAtramental adaptdation is via evolution moron.
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@AForsakenHero A change in eating habits in a minor change, more having to do with the field of micro-evolution within a given strain(which exists), than with Macro- evolution, which is one thing becoming another. Sadly, the nylonase have not yet evolved into humans (bummer) they are still flavobacterium. How long has cheese whiz existed? did we evolve the ability to eat cheese whiz?
theorv29 1 year ago
@theorv29 2 things. Macro evolution is the change from one species to another and HAS occured as nylonase is a new species. The second thing is that you alike to many creationsists misundestand this: Macro evolution is the change in species yes, but DOES NOT mean that they become completely different species. They simply change just enough to count as a new species, and still remain very similar to ( if you want to call it this ) the parent species. I will continue on an added post:
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
@theorv29 flavobacterium is not a species it is a group in which all species within are called. E.G. humans are part of the taxonomic group greater apes. Finally: We could always digest cheese whiz, we use the same methods we do for other foods as it works. However with nylonase a specific enzyme is needed to break it down. The species that break it down ONLY break down nylon and could not have existed without it. So either a bacterium evolved to gain this ability or evolved to lose all others.
AForsakenHero 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AForsakenHero A change in eating habits in a minor change, more having to do with the field of micro-evolution within a given strain(which exists), than with Macro- evolution, which is one thing becoming another. Sadly, the nylonase have not yet evolved into humans (bummer) they are still flavobacterium. How long has cheese whiz existed? did we evolve the ability to eat cheese whiz?
theorv29 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious you're an idiot.
zanzibartraveler09 2 years ago
@waketheoblivious evolution is a fact, animals and plants do change over time, the theory explain the massive and yes fucking massive amount of facts and put them into a model, you know, like germ theory, heliocentric, round earth, atomic all theories get out of your little bubble of illusional reality and wake up to the REAL world
patrickledford420 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Examples of EVOLUTION "Missing Link" Science Fiction SORCERY
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------
- Piltdown Man, 1913-53, planted manufactured HOAX
- Nebraska Man, 1922, discarded Pig's Tooth
- Lucy, 1974, Petsmart Gerbil
- Orce Man, 1982, 4 mo. old Donkey Bone
- ida, 2009, classification unsupportable
- Peppered Moths fraudulent overreaching conclusions
- ect, ect, ect .... planted frauds and unsupportable bullshit
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Hey Wake you could start posting some of your own thoughts again, then we will stop marking almost evry post of yours as spam
Toudiyama 2 years ago
A leading established authority within the Science Community made this observation:
"Evolution is baseless and quite incredible." *Ambrose Flemming, president, British Association for Advancement of Science, in The Unleashing of Evolutionary Thought.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
"It is not the duty of science to defend the theory of evolution, and stick by it to the bitter end no matter which illogical and unsupported conclusions it offers. On the contrary, it is expected that scientists recognize the patently obvious impossibility of Darwin's pronouncements and predictions . . Let's cut the umbilical cord that tied us down to Darwin for such a long time. It is choking us and holding us back." LL Cohen, Darwin Was Wrong: A Study in Probabilities (1985).
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Evolutionists, assemble thoughts to argue the existence of their mind. Vehemently argue they have one. Followed by, arguing because they can't see or touch God, He doesn't exist. Then they attempt to rationalize and justify their Satanic insanity.
Evolutionists having to rationalize and justify the Lies and Fraud associated with the Theory of Evolution, reveal themselves to be Frauds and Liars.
-waketheoblivious
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Live and let live. If the creationists want to take everything in the Bible literally, let them do so. Calling others ignorant or worse just reflectts badly on you. The only problem comes when creationism or intelligent design gets taught in Science class.
gsco82 2 years ago
Live and let live is not what the bible preachers for unbelievers though.
lynus111 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SATANIC NAZIS WHO FAILED TO ANSWER DEFINING QUESTION, FEIGNED IGNORANCE, DIVERTED OR ADMITTED SATANIC WORSHIP.
COPY, PASTE & UPDATE. EVOLUTION IS FRAUD
-
WHY ARE SMIRKING WORLD LEADERS & CELEBRITIES EXCHANGING HOOK EM HORNS HAND SIGNAL WHEN THEY ALL DIDN'T GO TO TEXAS?
hint - "Illumanati symbols"
-
*SATANIC NAZIS:
brpierce, transtlantic, oXGenesisXo, ozowen, halabalo195, deckard9757, JACKtheRIPP3R189, foxlake02, egamble22, 123heh1, moretech
*see their homepage friends lists
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
SATANIC NAZI
Wakeupoblivious demonstrates he's seeking to fool people by making them oblivious to science
BEWARE of Waketheoblivious. See his homepage- it is full of Nazis and Troll worshippers.
Wake lives in Trellheim.
Beware of Satanic Trolls.
ozowen 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2/4. Science was rewarded with credibility based on the adopting the standard of "irrefutable evidence". Rather then acknowledge the role the truth played, Science ignores the truth and abandoned their commitment. Credibility eroded as science began to rationalize and justify irrational behavior. Science slid to practice deception and conditioned humanity to follow suit. Ignoring the standard established to gain credibility, science replaced "irrefutable evidence" with "plausible bullshit".
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
1/4. Science moved from the realm of Witchcraft & Sorcery by adopting "irrefutable evidence" as the appropriate scientific standard. 1913 Piltdown Man, was a manufactured fraud used to by-pass school board objection. 1953 the fraud was finally revealed and Piltdown Man was removed from texts, but not the Theory. 100 yrs later and still no legitimate "missing link". Evolution diminished science to Medieval Sorcery by ethically failing to meet the standard of "irrefutable evidence".
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Hey Wake
You get the first prize
You are now the Creationist Prick of the Week
and Moron of the Year
ozowen 2 years ago
Wake is a Satanic Troll Nazi
Hates the truth
No honour
ozowen 2 years ago
What missing link? Evolution doesn't predict any *missing link*.
It was to be found it would disprove evolution.
intubatto 2 years ago
@intubatto
Ida (darwinius masillae), was the most recent attempt by evolutionists to provide the "missing link". In the entire history of this theory, it has never provided a legitimate missing link that legitimately met the historical standard of "irrefutable evidence". Adopted by science to distance itself from Medieval Sorcery/Witchcraft. Today, Pharmaceutical/Medical Industries still employ remnants of Medieval Witchcraft imagery.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
@intubatto
"Orce man, discovered in the southern Spanish town of Orce. In 1982, hailed as the "oldest fossilized human remains ever found in Europe". One year later officials admitted the skull fragment was not human, but probably from a 4 mo. old donkey. Scientists had said the skull belonged to a 17 year old man, who lived 900,000 - 1.6 million years ago. They even had detailed drawings done to represent what he would have looked like. Reminiscent of 1922, Nebraska Man fraud."
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
Hi waketheoblivious,you can keep beating on those fossils,it doesn't really matter for evolution as the evidence now days comes from the DNA.
intubatto 2 years ago
@intubatto
They been teaching the bullshit theory for 100 years as fact and the fact is they still have no "irrefutable evidence". Just a hoax followed by constant presentations of another fraud as the "missing link". Pathetic disregard for ethics and integrity and the typical Nazi response is Satanic Indignation when faced with the truth, Where is the "missing link"? Teaching fraud as fact, bullshit.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
I have ALREADY told you,evolution doesn't predict any missing link as it would disprove evolution. The major support for evolution comes from the DNA.
intubatto 2 years ago
@intubatto
Well where the Hell were you in 1913 when the manufactured Piltdown Man was presented as the "missing link" that could satisfy the historical standard of "irrefutable evidence" and allow this fraud to be taught as fact for 40 years until it was revealed and then another 60 and still no "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as fact. Cut with the bullshit. You are supporting a Satanic Fraud to be taught as fact. Either meet the standard or STFU
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
You are not reading what I wrote you and any way was science that disproved "your" Piltdown Man. Ok,now DNA !
Humans share 98% of they DNA with chimps.
intubatto 2 years ago 3
@intubatto
Go ahead profess the theory of evolution with all it's Hoax and fraud history and claim to be an honest man with integrity. Who are you expecting to consider your opinion besides egotistical pathological liars, genocidal maniacs and serial killers?
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
This is all you have? I though you were talking about evolution,but apart from call people names....what do you want to say.
intubatto 2 years ago
@intubatto
That if people maintain themselves to be honest, with ethics and integrity it is impossible to claim those attributes and support this theory. Science can accommodate Lie you die technology so why not strap politicians in an electric chair wired to a lie detector and start asking question. Unwilling to submit to that monthly get out of politics. Going to maintain have irrefutable evidence, sit in the chair and prove it. Submit a fraud as the missing link pay with their life.
waketheoblivious 2 years ago
None of our modern understanding of biology makes any sense at all except for in the context of evolution. The theory of evolution fully explains the diversity and tenacity of life on earth, and is not contradicted by any current scientific thorry.
Jpark8283 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Humans also share the same ratio of chromosomes with tobacco plants. How does that prove we evolved from apes? It's an interesting factoid... I'll give you that. But, it is not conclusive evidence.
daveyjazz72 2 years ago
same ratio... yes....
same genetic information.... noooop...
apes and humans share 98% of genetic info...
XanderHG 2 years ago 10
@XanderHG humans are apes i think u mean chimps
patrickledford420 1 year ago
@patrickledford420 yep, you are right, sorry about that one, but you got my point, hehe...
XanderHG 1 year ago
@daveyjazz72 it point at common ancestry.
All living beings are related to each other.
intubatto 2 years ago
Humans share the 98% of the same PROTEIN SEQUENCES with apes.
That's far more of a confluence than simply the ratio of chromosomes.
ikvsabre 2 years ago 2
the number doesn't matter (well it does) but it's the size & composition of the chromosomes that rly matters.
Also, humans have 46 chromosomes, and all others great apes have 48. Why's that? Because one of our chromosomes got fussed. How do we know? There's telomeres(which r the ends of a chromosome) in the middle of our #2 chromosome, where it's not supposed to be. And that fused part of our chromosome is identical to Ape chromosome #11 (the 1 we're "missing").
How's that for proof?
TheHomelessCripple 1 year ago
@daveyjazz72 who says "Humans also share the same ratio of chromosomes with tobacco plants."
What exactly is a "ratio of chromosomes"? Your argument (like those of most creationists) makes absolutely no sense. A "ratio" is a comparison of two different things. Like the ratio of real scientists to creation scientists is about 10,000 to 1.
wysiwyg666 1 year ago
One interesting supplement to my "ratio" of creation scientists to real scientists.
Cretinists like to list scientists who were also creationists. Most have about 1000 names, mostly by listing scientists who lived before Darwin published his theory or scientists in fields unrelated to evolution.
Lets put that in perspective. "Project Steve" (google it) lists more scientists than that who believe in evolutionary theory ... all named Steve.
wysiwyg666 1 year ago
@daveyjazz72 your right, but its not only the similarities its the pattern of them that make a phylogenetic tree. you may want to look some of this up PLEASE
patrickledford420 1 year ago