Added: 3 months ago
From: DemocraticVideo
Views: 401,450
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,132)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @mikekazik1 The short answer to your list of questions? Politics and money. What I want to know is, what problem do you have with the Constitution in its current state today? Most of the problems have since been remedied, such as slavery and education and voting rights. American history is not some shining beacon of moral perfection, but Rome wasn't built in a day, either. I think we've done pretty well in defining the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for ALL citizens.

  • @southernlibertybelle The reason why amending it is an unacceptable option is that article 5 makes it nearly impossible to do so. Since ¾ of the states have to ratify an amendment, the most rural and backward states in this country with barely any connection to mainstream American culture are overrepresented and put a choke-hold on even the most modest changes. A better option would be to pass constitutional amendments based on 65% of the popular vote.

  • @southernlibertybelle I already told you what my issues are. It's vaguely written, it is virtually impossible to amend, it creates an inefficient federal government, it over-represents rural areas, it doesn't promote economic equality, it does not place reasonable limitations on freedom, it does not protect the environment, and it doesn't allow our government to partake in reasonable actions that governments all over the world are able to do.

  • @mikekazik1 I didn't say it took America a long time to fully accept the Constitution. If anyone didn't, they would have been breaking the law and would have had to pay the price. ;-)

    What I said was: it took America, as a whole, a long time to accept the IDEALS on which the nation was founded. When the people came around, the Constitution was amended to reflect it.

  • @southernlibertybelle Well that is not true either. The nation was founded on principles of exploitation, injustice, inequality and minimum government intervention. The statements of all people being born equal and having equal rights was propaganda created by lawyers who knew how to play it both ways. The reason why politics and money allowed those injustices to happen is that the Constitution did jack to prevent those things.

  • "MITT" is a glove that doesn't fit XD

  • Ron Paul 2012!

  • Doesn't have a job.

    But makes as much in one day as most people make in a year.

    Pays lower tax rates than most people.

    And the only policy position he hasn't completely flip-flopped on? More tax cuts for guys like him.

  • 2 Mitts, 1 cup

  • Mitt Romney: Please voters, just tell me what you want to hear so you'll vote for me.

  • @mikekazik1 What challenges facing the modern world do you think the U.S. Constitution does not provide for? And why are amendments not an option?

    I'd also be curious to know what person or group you think is capable and responsible enough to draft a modern document that would replace the U.S. Constitution.

  • @southernlibertybelle The challenges were are facing that the constitution does not provide for are health care, environmental protection, equal education, issues stemming from scientific research. There are many other issues that the constitution addresses in some way but so vaguely that modern people are left clueless. A perfect example is the 4th amendment. There have been many supreme court cases on that amendment because it doesn't define what a reasonable search is.

  • @mikekazik1 The Declaration of Independence stated that all men were created equal and endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That bit wasn't for protecting the rich. ;-)

    But it did take America a while to fully understand, or accept, what that meant. That's why we have had amendments to the Constitution on slavery, women's rights, etc. It was never going to be perfect from the get-go. Humans drafted it. But we've also made it better.

  • @southernlibertybelle The Declaration of Independence is not part of the Constitution. Its a document that was presented to foreign nations to get them to help us out during the Revolution. When the Supreme Court looks at what the government can and can't do, they look at the Constitution, not the Again, you need to get your facts straight.

    It did not take America a long time to fully accept the Constitution. The Constitution excluded a lot of people. That is a fact.

  • @southernlibertybelle If the Constitution really applied to everyone, then why was slavery ok? Why was it ok to exterminate the native americans? Why weren't poor people who did not own land able to vote? Why weren't there social programs that sought to provide everyone with equal educational opportunities, regardless of income level? Why did the Founders created the electoral college and not allow presidents to be elected by popular vote?

  • Uggggg, as a Republican I hate that I actually agree with this Democratic video.

  • He is a flip flopper, because he's politically weak. However, if Ron Paul was his vice precident and held him to account, he would be a good president. At least he had a career and owned a business and knows whats that like, unlike most of the career politicians *cough *obama.

    Also, stop showing clips of what the democratic media correspondents think about him. I DON'T CARE

  • @woaisme I see the idea of Romney/Paul alliance bandied around a lot, but I just do not see how Ron Paul could possibly ever agree to be the Vice President to a man who is so protective of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve. One of them would have to seriously change their tune on the economic situation in order for that to be possible, and I can't imagine Ron Paul relinquishing his enduring ideals to be a running mate.

  • Brokered Convention. Romney gets presidential nomination with the stipulation Ron Paul is his VP. Only way I can even see how republicans can beat the Democrats in Nov.

  • RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL!!! WHOOOOHOOOO!!!

  • @mikekazik1 Lol, I can't see how a document that defends the individual liberty and rights of every single citizen, rich or poor, was designed to protect the rich and maintain the monopoly of power. Do you have issues with democracy or something? Because democracy was designed to put the power in the hands of the people, and our Constitution clearly reflects that.

    I would love to glance over a draft of what you think should replace the Constitution... should be interesting reading. ;-)

  • @southernlibertybelle It's main purpose was not to protect the rights of people. If that were the case, slavery would have been outlawed, the Native Americans would have been given basic protections, and the federal government would not be limited by the 10th amendment. I have no issue with the democracy. But the Constitution did not establish a democracy. It established a Constitutional republic. Where are you obtaining your info from? Your views do not reflect reality.

  • @southernlibertybelle Ron Paul is right when he says that most of what the federal government is doing is unconstitutional. I agree with him on that. That's why the constitution needs to be replaced with a more modern document that addresses the challenges we have in our MODERN world. The Constitution is a vaguely written document that addressed the challenges that existed in the world three centuries ago. A lot has changed since then and we need to make changes.

  • @tubeyouitsaccount: Ron Paul!

  • Obama, Romney, Gingrich. Santorum: Banker puppets in it for special interests

    So whos in it for  you and me?!?!? REPLY WITH THE ANSWER!!!!!!!

  • ROMNEY 2012 DONE DEAL **** NOBAMA 2012 DONE DEAL

  • sheeple have need to be on the "winning team" so they vote for whoever is 1st on the rigged cnn polls. while the educated vote Ron Paul because he has wisdom and has been consistent. Vote Ron Paul

  • i doesnt understand this ad, first rule for politican : what I care about the sh!t I said yesterday.

  • If u vote for this guy ur a fucking retard I swear

  • @mikekazik1 You are not interested in a man who is going to have "a seizure over not honoring the Constitution"? Do you not know what the Oath of Office is?

    "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

    He or she who makes such a vow ought to have a seizure when they break it, because they have deceived and failed the entire nation.

  • @southernlibertybelle Yes I know the oath of office. The Constitution is an archaic document that's well suited as bird cage liner. It is poorly suited to guide a modern nation WELL. The constitution was designed to protect the interests of the rich and maintain the monopoly on power that the rich had. There is nothing that fantastic about the Constitution that we have. If more people FULLY understood the Constitution, more people would be fighting to replace it.

  • I just searched this channel for Ron Paul dirt.

    Nada.

    Feels good.

  • ron paul 2012 !!! he the best

  • mitt roney is the sole loser !!!

  • Can't trust millionaire pretending be president. Simply can't take. Obama wins unless Ron Paul is in the ticket.

  • RON PAUL 2012!

  • I'm running for office for Pete sake!!!

  • 219 people will just vote on a fucking haircut in a suit, fucking idiots

  • Ron Paul 2012!!!!

  • I am a democrat and President Obama lost my vote when he signed the NDAA. By signing it on New Years Eve made it worse, like we wouldn't notice. Fuck Obama. I will not be fooled again. Call me what you want but Ron Paul is getting my vote (now that I have switched my voter registration to republican).

  • Exactly what Ron Paul has been calling this guy out on!!! RON PAUL

  • @dd1676 Actually he hasn't been calling him out on anything. I would assume he's getting ready for a position in Romney's cabinet or VP

  • It's so obvious that Mitt Romney is unelectable against Obama. But who else is their in this discraceful GOP field of candidates? The hateful extremist Rick santorum? The 74 year old dust bag Ron Paul? The I don't know where I stand on any issue Mitt Romney? Their is no choice but Obama for 2012.

  • This ad is actually very good. It should be played when Romney gets the GOP 2012 nomination and in the states that haven't held their GOP caucasus, or whatever that state has.

  • @tomer3344 Wrong again, two for two on your consistency of not havin a clue of who or what your talkin about! Kudos....lol

  • DemocraticVideo is supported by Obama,

    Srsly I WOULD RATHER HAVE MITT ROMNEY AS PRESIDENT THEN OBAMA

  • @mhead66 quit taking this out of proportion. I haven't said anything and you keep going on and on. My point when I commented like two days a

  • @96gfan Yet you keep replying... ;) If you don't want to discuss politics, why do you keep coming back to a political ad to reply to comments to your comments?

  • Its time NOW for all of us to find our VOICE . SILENCE no more . WATCH : The Millitary KNOWS israel did 911 .

  • You must love to argue because I haven't

  • @mhead66 nope I'm not bright at all. I don't look at google enough and read bloggers talk about their beliefs. I also don't comment on everything on YouTube either. I'm an idiot.

  • @96gfan No, just uninformed if you dont think war is imminent or if u think that more drilling will lower gas prices. Russia's ONLY carrier is parked off of Syria. Assad said he'd shoot 1000s of missiles before he's ousted. Ahmadinejad has vowed to nuke Israel the day he gets one. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt won the election and called for the extermination of Jews. Ahmadinejad called for Israel to be annihilated. Just cause you're sarcastic doesn't make you noble, or right.

  • RƎVO⅃UTION OR REVOLUTION! RON PAUL 2012!

  • but yet they ignore..... Ron Paul??? makes perfect sense.

  • @MILaC1 They ignored Ron Paul because he has no growth potential in the election. It is already a story that we know the end to. Ron Paul will run till the very end and he will loose. What's the point of making a video about a guy who we already know will loose? It makes more sense to make a video about a major candidate who has a decent shot at winning the primary.

  • how does this video not have more views. the man is a retard

  • How the fuck is this guy winning in delegates? RON PAUL 2012!

    Greetings from Australia

  • @Warfist264 I am sure you don't know who Ron Paul is as most American fans don't either! RP is ONLY for individual rights on the Federal Level NOT the States! He thinks States should be able to make being gay illegal or require religious test for voting or whatever it is states would want to do! Look up "Incorporation Doctrine" which forces States to comply with the Bill of Rights...Ron Paul wants it repealed! He HATES the Civil Rights Act, The American with Disabilities Act, etc!

  • Romney hasn't "won" any state; he's only stolen them. Ron Paul is the REAL winner! Romney's just an establishment freak the NOBODY LIKES!

  • @tomer3344 Nope...he's neither one a those...your source is wrong, sorry mayn!

  • @TrickTrolan Apparently, you didn't watch the video. To say he's not a liar... to say you support one position, then change it for political expediency, to gain votes... that IS a liar.

  • @TrickTrolan You're an idiot

  • I just realized that I don't know what Mitt Romney believes... like... I really don't know. How can you vote for someone when you don't know what you're voting for?

  • Romney said "I like being able to fire people."

    Gingrich said "I like being able to hire people."

    When your character flaws are exposed by Newt Gingrich you know you're in trouble.

  • OBAMA SUCKS GO ROMNEY OR PAUL!!!

  • @Mycommentsgethumbsup If you nominate Romney, you'll get 4 more years of Obama, guaranteed. Mitt will NEVER get the moderates necessary to win - so, go ahead, nominate him, and see what you get.

  • The stupidity of this country is baffling. That's why a waffle like Romney even ended up in this race.

  • Romney is unelectable. Vote for Ron Paul.

  • @MikeFCox RON PAUL 2012!

  • @SzergiuszTV Obama 2012

  • @MikeFCox Lol Ron Paul is even more unelectable.

  • Romney 2012!! Fuck the haters and obumma

  • @Mycommentsgethumbsup MANY polls have shown Ron Paul as having the best chance to beat Obama… what is Gingrich or Romney or Santorum going to say to Obama that isn’t hypocritical to any position they have once had themselves i.e. support for individual mandate, carbon taxes, open borders, gun control, support for TARP, etc

  • @Eye2EyeIIIV Well, obama actually leads ron paul by an average of 8 points. And he leads romney by about 6 points. These are the facts

  • @tomer3344 NO WAY can those numbers be accurate

  • @Eye2EyeIIIV According to the Real Clear Politics poll aggregator, they are accurate. Obama leads Romney by 6%.

  • @Eye2EyeIIIV They are. Go to realclearpolitics . com

  • @tomer3344 You are right. Obama leads Romney by 6, Paul by 8, Santorum by 8 and Gingrich by 16. RealClearPolitics com. I wish more people would state facts, like you did, and not say that their opinions are facts. Well done.

  • `Mitt flipped on Two Americas as well. At first he vowed only one than stated their are two. During the last election.

  • Vote Ron Paul '12

  • @redcirclelive Vote Obama '12

  • What's devastating about this ad isn't that it's funny to watch Romney contradict himself, the danger in this for Romney is that he can't be trusted. No one wants to vote for someone they can't trust. The closing line in this ad "who is this guy, can we trust him" is the reason that Romney's having such a hard time winning the Republican nomination and this same problem will follow him into the general. Who want's a president without a spine?

  • This is hilarious. Too bad the implication is that Obama is a better choice. Yeah, vote for the guy that increased the debt in three years the same amount Bush did in eight. Obama = Bush on steroids. Ron Paul is the only one who can save America.

  • @chipk77 i'd love to see your evidence that the debt or the economy is worse under obama. every major analyst disagrees with you - except romney. i'll bet you don't even know how much we've paid in interest on the debt since 2008.

  • @sykunt Uh....look up us debt clock.

  • So when is: "ObamavObama" The story of two men trapped in one body" coming out?

    Or: "MittvMittvObamavObama, the Progressive Statst ORGIE Party to Enslave Stupid Sheeple" movie going to be released?

  • @tricktrolan, it's good to see that the media has also succeeded in brainwashing you. Get an education, do some research, then perhaps talk in public again.

  • Who edited this joke of a video, Corky from life goes on?

    ROMNEY 2012 DONE DEAL NOBAMA 2012 DONE DEAL

  • @TrickTrolan Romney is a liar and a cheat. 

  • Mitt Romney is the best Anti-Mitt Romney

  • In a time where honesty/integrity should trump all other attributes, I say if U can’t even pass the moral test, U shouldn’t even b allowed 2 run:

    NEWT cheated wife. I wanna know that something stood n his way when offered the opportunity to cheat/lie, his morals, God, something-nothing stood n his way, which 2 me means when the time comes, he’ll choose what he wants over everything else.

    MITT: record flip-flopperr. He’ll always choose what benefits him.

    How can u trust they'll do what they say?

  • The difference between Mitt and Newt are that Mitt changed when he noticed people didnt like his views, Newt changed when he got paid.

  • this is a twisted video that is edited badly because i have seen most of the long cut clips that they cut to make him look like hes flipping everything

  • @richgriff Same here... a lot of this is edited poorly, just like the Bain video that someone made.

  • @NYyankees722vids Yes, it is edited poorly. That does not change the fact that Romney was a left leaning liberal while in Mass., and is claiming to be conservative now. Watch his debate in the 90s with Ted Kennedy for Senator, and watch them now - its like there's 2 different people. If you ignore that, you deserve what you get - and that will be a GOP loss to Obama in November. Nominate him and you can count on it.

  • @mhead66 I've seen the old videos... more flip flopping by him than an iHop chef. He has put up a great defense in each debate, if you've been watchin each one. Obama prefers Newt. What's Obama gonna do to Romney? Call him a flip flopper? liberal? gov't healthcare lover? Too bad that describes Obama. Judging by your post, you haven't watched all or nearly all debates. I could be wrong-- I've been wrong before.

  • @NYyankees722vids I havent watched lots of them, and you're right - he and Obama are similar, which will damage Obama's arguments. However, SOME GOP voters won't vote Mitt cause he's a Mormon, some won't cause he's a closet liberal, some indies won't cause he's very pro-banker... it's about defeating Obama - and though Mitt is a better choice than Newt, I still think he's unelectable. Santorum has a better shot, but he's very conservative - Obama wins unless the economy tanks

  • @mhead66 Like I said, in the debates the other candidates questioned his flip flopping and he often had a great defense that shut them down. Mitt is called Obama 2.0 but as we've discovered, Obama can't attack Mitt for things he's flipped on. I didn't like the fact that Mitt was Mormon, but got over it. Pretty much everyone is pro-banker (leave hopeless RP outta it). Mitt has something to run on; are you better off than you were $4 trillion ago? It's gonna be a one-term proposition.

  • @NYyankees722vids Sadly, its all charisma - McCain didn't have it, Kerry and Gore - both more experienced didn't have it, Dole and his 40 yrs experience lost, Bush1 the sitting Prez lost to inexperienced Clinton. Clinton was charismatic, Bush had cowboyish charisma and Gore and Kerry were wooden, McCain didn't excite and Romney is slick, plastic and doesnt inspire like Obama did. The GOP needs a galvanizing, exciting man full of ideas, not a car-salesman talker like Mitt.

  • @mhead66 Not entirely... Obama used social networking to his advantage in 08, will again in 12. Yes, all of the older scruffy looking politicians usually fail because of the way they look. Case in point, JFK vs. Nixon. JFK was great on TV (Nixon was sweaty, no makeup), but Nixon was best on the radio. HW had a bit of a recession going on and his "no new taxes" line wasn't too true, along with other things. Gore was a fool, Kerry barely lost it. Ron Paul isn't exciting but known by the young.

  • Wow, Willard Mitt Rommey is severely rich, the one percenter will sell USA to his foreign and domestic billionaire friends, if he is elected to be the President of United States of America.

    Mitt will steal from the income middle class and senior retirees.

    Mitt does not care about the severely poor. Mitt only cares about all his offshore accounts, his billionaires friends and corporations

  • ah well, he is no different than 99% of the elected officials, and that transcends both sides and all levels of government... the one commentator got it right romney has no core values except for staying rich at other peoples expense,,, very simulair to obama and the other thieves...

  • More lies from the Obama following blind. Eve if it were true he would still be better than Obama. My dead dog would make a better president than Obama. Talk about flip flop, just look at your president. He loves America like O.J. loved Nicole. He's health plan is different than the Socialist Obama program. I'm not racist either, I hate his white half too. Obama's a Fucking POS.

  • Sir Mitt of Romney, your go-to man for tweed.

  • must be running for Pete's sake sure isn't our's...

  • ok.. maybe he does

  • oh wait, no he doesnt

  • Mitt Romney approves of this message

  • Heil Mittler!

  • I love how all of this is taken out of context...

    Remember what the WH Dems say: "Kill Romney, run against Gingrich."

  • Comment removed

  • The sad fact is that MITT ROMNEY is probably the LEAST of the EVILS on the GOP side.This said,he is still as a REPUBLICAN gonna be under pressure from these Tea Party MORONS in the House to continue to SCREW THE POOR and STARVE THE BEAST.These are the same people who were voting for DEFAULT back in August.I didn't vote for OBAMA last time,but I feel I have no choice this time.These people are puppets of GROVER NORQUIST.They will NOT vote to raise taxes on the RICH.They put the RICH above the US

  • Comment removed

  • @MrDullmop true, but WWlll isn't happening soon anyways. And I'd take Romney over Obama any day. He just hasn't really done much and he can't keep blaming bush for that.

  • @96gfan Go to Google News and enter Iran and Russia. We will be at war before Nov, and perhaps with Syria, too. Yes, it will be WW3. Settling for Romney over Obama, when Paul is out there, is what you deserve if you nominate him - you will deserve 4 more years of Obama. McCain, Kerry, Gore, Dole, Bush 1 - All non-charismatic older guys who lost. Romney is the same... Nominate him for GOP, and you get Obama until 2017.

  • Watch the yt video the santorum connection - scary

  • Hey guys cut him a break..... when you lie that often sometimes you confuse yourself

  • Democrats are gonna tear Mitt a new one! Ron Paul is the best chance of the Republican and Libertarian Party.

  • Its time NOW for all of us to find OUR VOICE . SILENCE NO MORE . Watch : israel did 911 ....on , YouTube .

  • @Mike2020able If you believe Israel did 911... you shouldn't be entitled to vote... due to your lack of intelligence. YT some Netanyahu speeches. I would vote for that guy as U.S. President in a SECOND! Guts, brains and integrity.

  • The Dems are going to fucking wreck this guy with adverts like these if he gets the Republican nomination.

  • It is scary to think that the mainstream media has succeeded in brainwashing the majority of republicans to the extent that they would vote for someone like that. RON PAUL 2012!

  • @cameracrazy94 well it helps Romney spends like 10 million per state in ads

  • @cameracrazy94 So, you like Ron Paul...I guess you are willing to only have Bill of Right protections on the Federal Level but give them up when it comes to States...Where MOST violations of individual rights take place! I doubt you want that but it is very clear Ron Paul does!!

  • @Viracocha711 Something you miss understand is that our Federal government should be held accountable by the states or in other words the people. When we give the issues to states rather than the Federal government we protect our voice and individual rights. We as the voters have more control. This is a principle that our founding fathers had when they put together the constitution....

  • @cameracrazy94 So, if your State declares being gay to be moral crime & abortion illegal & requires anyone wanting to vote or run for office to swear their belief in Jesus Christ...You would be OK with this? What if your State block internet access to all websites the State Gov, declared "immoral"...You would be OK with this? Ron Paul thinks this is OK if the States do it! If you disagree with my analogy then you DO NOT KNOW WHO Ron Paul IS! I would shed blood to prevent this!

  • @Viracocha711 My moral beliefs agree with that. But again what you are missing is that YOU are the voter. So what the majority believes is what will be passed in each state. If Iowa does X and you don't like it than move to Maine where X doesn't happen. We are not going to be quick to give up the rights we have. So I can guarantee that internet censorship will not happen when we vote as the majority. Ron Paul believes this. I have researched all aspects of his beliefs and know that he does.

  • @cameracrazy94 You CAN'T guarantee, ANYTHING! Your state may not allow you to leave! Give up all rights & then think your ability to vote will change a damn thing? You can vote now!! THINK THINK THINK! States & local governments are by far WORSE violators of individual rights than Federal Gov.! This is a well known FACT! THINK THINK THINK! WOW! You Ron Paul fans really do worry me. Thank-goodness he will NEVER win anything except harmless seat in Congress.

  • @Viracocha711 .....The constitution limits the government and protects the people, as does the bill of rights. By being able to have the power in our hands at the state level we limit the federal government and protect ourselves. And Ron Paul supports this philosophy.

  • @cameracrazy94 The constitution was never designed to protect the lower classes. It was designed to protect the interests of the wealthy upper classes. The reason why the Constitution is not being honored is that the American right is not willing to have an honest and open conversation about updating the Constitution so it meets the challenges of our age. The American right treats this terribly flawed document like a sacred text handed down from God, which it is certainly not.

  • @mikekazik1 The constitution was fully meant to protect all American citizens, rich or poor. The reason it is not being honored is because people are not being educated about our true history. There is no need to update it. There are flaws in the constitution, but our solutions will not create it to be better. If we would stick to the true intent then our country wouldn't hurt economically, we would have a better court system, and thousands of soldiers wouldn't die each year. Ron Paul wants this

  • @cameracrazy94 The statement that the Constitution protects everyone is just propaganda that is being peddled by the elite who benefit from the Constitution. There are many educated people who are against many parts of the Constitution because they realize how unworkable it really is if it was truly honored. There was a time when the US was as libertarian as Ron Paul wants it to be. You had enormous income gaps, social injustice to the extreme and much more instability.

  • @cameracrazy94 What is so great about Ron Paul? He is a reactionary who wants to bring America back to the way it was two centuries ago.

  • @mikekazik1 He is a man that wants a successful and productive US. He believes in the fundamental principles our country was founded on. He is anti-intervention and pro-peace. He wants thought rather than reaction. He will not be easily swayed by lobbyists or bureaucrats. He has been consistent in what he believes for the past 30+ years. He predicted everything economic problem (and more) from 2002 on. He will protect our rights and guard our economy from manipulation.

  • @cameracrazy94 I agree that the US needs to lay off the military military intervention. I hate the principles that the US was founded on and I fully support the idea of moving away from them. The US was founded on social injustice, economic exploitation and unsustainable resource consumption. You think he doesn't bow to lobbyists? The only reason he doesn't bow to lobbyists is that he is already catering to them with his agenda.

  • @cameracrazy94 I, like many other people, am not interested in a man who is going to have a seizure over not honoring the Constitution. I want a leader who will expand our rights in America, like the right to good healthcare regardless of income level. I want a government that will manage America's resources so that we do no waste into oblivion. I want a nation that is more egalitarian and draws a sharp contrast to the America of the past. Thumbs up if you agree!

  • @unclelight soooo WWll created jobs, but wwlll would make us lose them? It does mean gas woul be shut though, but ,aube we might actually start drilling here more often. And our economy is already dead, it actually might help

  • @96gfan It would probably help with jobs yes but I don't think its worth the millions of lives that will be lost because of it. It would probably make WW2 look like a water balloon fight.

  • @96gfan Wow... you're not too bright, are ya'? I guess you believe Palin saying Just drill baby, drill? 2 years ago, oil demand dropped to the lowest point in 18 years and the price of a barrel doubled, to 66.00 - supply and demand is out, price collusion is in. The GOP says it backs free markets, but it doesn't exist. Google the Glass Steagle Act to find out the REAL reason for the economic crises of the last 10 years.

  • Vote for Jon Stewart! lol seriously though if this guy is voted into office our country is full of retards. Obama is far from the best president we have seen but things could be worse. Thanks Bush you piece of shit, you really did us in, I have no respect for the Republican party anymore.

  • and so this guy is winning?

  • Ron Paul is strange, he actually wants 2 restore america! He is not changing stance based on who he's in front of, he has consistently voted against unconstitutional bills, & he actually wants 2 restore our libertys! What a wacko! Why vote 4 sustainability or sound money? Elimination of taxes & our national debt? Wow! Is he real!? Why vote for him who has been consistent in his views for 30 years, when u can have a flip-flopper, or a fake conservative? Its a no brainer people, vote 4 Ron Paul.

  • If this clown becomes president i'll seriously lose hope in the people of this country

  • this AD is so devastating on so many levels in his own words

    All you need to do is to play this everywhere

    no sane person will vote for this troll

  • @blustatez Play all of Obama's failures and he'll be deported.

  • this guy is unaware of youtube

    poor bastard

    SWISS MITT

  • ROFL

    this guy is a tool

    youtube is gonna do him in

  • What an idiot!! Vote for Newt