I hate when people use this argument because your child could also become the next Hitler. Therefore this argument that "He could be president" means nothing.
Jesus refered to satan as a 'thief' when He warned us that , "The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep." (John 10:10-11) Yes the 'god of this world' satan kills (thousands) steals (property, families from each other, etc.) and destroys (earthquakes, storms, etc.).
Go ahead and interfere in your god's plan and see what your god does next.You've may have saved one,maybe two,but look at the hundreds & thousands that your God just got done aborting with the earth quake and tsunami,go interfering in his work and he'll just wipe out another 10,000 humans.Can't wait to see what else ur god does all because you can't leave well enough alone.Getting the picture?
I'm glad they didn't put that on the air.We have enough BullSh*t on it now.I like how u did the last part "could be the next President,how about adding it could also be the next child rapist or serial killer.
Also to pro-lifers, take a look at yourself, your real self and ask yourself, am I really pro-life? For example, do you eat meat? If so then technically you are condoning the "murder" helpless animals that were not given a choice. Do you support unjustified, unprovoked wars? Well then essentially you are supporting the death of many thousands of civilians! (women AND children) Support the death penalty? then you are in fact, pro-death. Why not just be what you say that you ARE 100%.
Also to pro-lifers, take a look at yourself, your real self and ask yourself, am I really pro-life? For example, do you eat meat? If so then technically you are condoning the "murder" of many helpless animals that were not given a choice. Do you support unjustified, unprovoked wars? Well then essentially you are supporting the death of many thousands of civilians! (women AND children) Support the death penalty? then you are in fact, pro-death. Why not just be what you say that you ARE 100%.
Jehmu Green is wanting it both ways. No to Pam Tebow's Great choice , , ,, but yes to women how choose to kill a life that they created,,,,,,,, NO CREDIBILITY MS. Greene. God grants life and it is his alone to give or take. Our constitution grants the right to life to all how have life, , , ,LIFE STARTS AT BIRTH ? Seriously,,,,what was the baby 30 seconds before birth,,,,? Think on that.
Whats ironic this is that Obama is one of the strongest supporters of baby murder there is. That may have had somthing to do with it....also why he didnt get my vote
I thought of that too, but maybe this message will hit home harder with the pro-abortion left when they realize that their "own" may have been aborted!
"To those who would preach the need for separation of church and state, I make my case as follows... So long as tax payers are being forced to fund abortions, separation of church and state does not exist because in doing this, the government is violating the rights of the people to practice what they believe if and when they are against the practice of abortion."
No he should have not. I don't like him but each of us should have our time to turn on this earth. he has been corrupted and so would you easily i bet.
yes, including those who were raped at gun or knife point seekernlife.
it should be the law of the land that if one is raped & becomes pregnant, she must at any age bare that child regardless of the hardship & inablility to cope, not to mention the emotional roller coaster to keep or give that child up.
that female must have been a damned sinner for god to have given her this "cross to bare".
it's the duty of every christian to insure she go thru this living hell, no matter what!
do you believe pregnancy should be forced on a child/woman no matter the conception circumstance? if you think the exception should be in the case of rape or incest, why? that child should have the same rights as one concieved in love right? if not, why do you need to force a nightmare on one with no willing part in conception?
do you sit back in your comfortable "christian" life & deem your beliefs be imposed on all, no matter the consequence? with intelligence, try to answer each question.
There should be guide lines for abortion, rape and incest yes, but when someone if foolish and stupid enough not to know how babies come into this world, NO! Life does begin at conseption, it is a living cell. Would you kill a dog or cat just because you did not want it? If so, that is wrong. God gave us brains use them. If you do not want a baby dont' screw around, like the STD'S they are giving so much bail out money to, DON'T SCREW AROUND, then you have nothing to worry about.
I don't believe that rap and incest should be the terms of it either. Back in the day incest was how kings and queens married. How did you get here? I also knew of a young man who's grandfather was his father. he lived and had a life. We all should.
If you notice my screen name I am an FCC liscensed general class radio operator (old school with morse code etc) I am very well aware of what the fcc can restrict, and what is considered "serving the public trust" a requirement for maintaining a liscense.
Maybe you wern't aware the constitution is no longer in force (PMSNBC) :<) and yes keith oberman's pap smear was negative.
Tell me: You say you support and advocate the Constitution? Do you know more about the Constitution than Jefferson or Washington? Lets find out who graduated from where!
all i read was your first inane sentence and refused to go any further.
if you had a question, no matter how stupidly it was phrased, it was completely ignored cause i was diverted and startled by just how wild your comment was, and how utterly devoid of sense it was.
where in god's green earth does this gem of wisdom come from starcatcher? where, it's just another brain fart, and you know what it reeks of absolute stupidity, and is devoid of logic. did you even graduate from junior high school 7777?
Did I step on your tail? It takes a hurt dog to yelp!
Tell me: You say you support and advocate the Constitution? Do you know more about the Constitution than Jefferson or Washington? Lets find out who graduated from where!
Maybe the money to make and show this commercial would be better spent saving children who are already alive and dieing from hunger, or are homeless. I find it funny that so many people are concerned about the unborn but as soon as they are born they are on their own.
Who says money hasn't been spent on homeless and abandoned? Much has been donated to them as well as precautionary ads instilling some sense into people displeasing God.
" I find it funny that so many people are concerned about the unborn but as soon as they are born they are on their own"
and where does that happen? same advocates for not killing also care for and give charity to homeless and starving.
Your erroneous. You can't tell me that $3,000,000 for a 30 second commercial is better than saving children who are living in this country and are hungry and homeless. How about $75million to try and stop gays from loving each other. I think that could have saved many more lives than this commercial.
I like your term "precautionary ads"
How about "force your will upon others ads". Or
" Darwin is athiest scum but we like to quote science when it follows our story book ads".
right on imilkgoatsforaliving. those so called "christians" refuse to look at reality, rather they base their beliefs on a book that is HIGHLY flawed & inaccurate in any number of instances. they pick & choose passages to obey as it fits their needs. to a person they pick & choose!
when a "christian" deems abortion evil, i delight in reminding myself of this fact & know they're the most evil minded uneducated, ignorant people on the face of the earth, more so than their much hated muslims.
Since Roe vs Wade we've had enough dead fetuses stacked 10 ft high that stretches 84 miles.
That's alot of killings. Small defenseless children I might add.
Once an egg has been fertilized it is no longer dormant but active with life multiplying and dividing cells throughout receiving nourishment through a feeding tube.
Lol, hey big mouth,i can curse w/ the best of them!The Constitution is law not religion.Too bad a person can't grow a brain,you'de be the perfect fucking candidate.
Abortion is from the religion of Satan.Keep it out of my life.maybe you ought to read the constitution.Does,"The pursuit of LIFE, liberty and justice" ring a bell?
That is a shame...it just goes to show you where American is going and I just don't mean the ad itself. People will have to keep their opinions to themselves...no matter who you are...this is bad for liberals as well as conservatives.
I was referring to the fact that the major networks routinely reject advertisements, especially for large events like the Superbowl; but, don't pretend you have some moral certainty about when human life begins, or that we would all be better off if only there was an even larger human population on earth.
oh for crying outloud ...lol...seriously...when does life begin... I'll tell you when it begins...it not a hard question. If ANY part of a baby/fetus does NOT have to exist ever...and a baby is just born...then that is when life starts...however if the baby/fetus HAS to go through those early stages of development then that is when life begins. so life begins when the sperm and egg meet because that is when the baby/fetus starts to grow and develop.
I don't claim to have a MORAL clarity to when human life begins, but scientifically and biologically speaking, there is absolutely no debate that a unique and distinct being exists at the moment of conception, that has all the DNA it ever needs to fully develop, if given 3 things: time, nutrition, and the necessary environment. That is a scientific fact beyond dispute.
Actually, wntoply6, that is NOT why the debate began. Roe v. Wade made their basis not on a scientific basis nor on the bedrock of U.S. law, but on the concept of the woman's privacy. Try this: before an adult, a child; before a child, an infant, before infant, a baby, before baby, a fetus, before a fetus, an embryo, before embryo, a blastocyst, and before that, a zygote, which is when the sperm and egg are one. Biologically, that is the first onset of a uniquely formed creature.
you might be right about when the debate began, no one for sure has the answer. but long before roe v wade the debate was on.
i make 2 points, 1st no one has the right to tell another what to do with their body, & more importantly neither you or the best scientists can tell me or anyone on the face of the earth, when life begins. you can opine about it, you can decide in your own mind when it begins, but in fact you don't know. if you do, you're the latest god & the world must worship you!
Can you read english? I just told you the SCIENTIFIC terminology for each stage of growth from conception onward. There is no dispute, no debate. A unique creature that did not exist, that has all 46 human chromosomes, exists from the moment of conception. If you follow what I wrote last, it is plain as day! It is not an opinion, it is not "someone else's body". It is new and unique life, distinct completely from mom or dad. YOU ARE JUST BEING STUBBORN.
your chronological logic justification astounds me. do you really use it as an argument against abortion? give me a few minutes & i'll top that with the highest insantiy & least common sense using your same thought process.
do you really debate anyone with intelligence regarding abortion, or is this your first attempt with one not of your beliefs? did you stay up nights coming up with that inane gem. or did your ignorant preacher imparted that as absolute justification against abortion?
WATCH OUT - the follow up commercial will have Hitler's fetus. "If he'd been aborted, millions of lives would have been saved. If you are pregnant with the next Hitler, get an abortion." haha
thankfully NBC had the courage to refuse to show such a commercial. shame on those who think their way is the ONLY truth, for they are the true bigots of this world.
dude this is retarded. They have no right to choose for women. Women have a right to decide what they want to do. So if a 13-year-old girl is raped she has the right to choose if she wants to get an abortion, no one has the right to choose for her. So i think this pro-life stuff is complete bull.
what i mean by ppl fell to the propaganda of abortion. is through ones ideas, watered down with lies, and passed on to another. then before you know it you have a society born not knowing right from wrong. what was once absurd is now justified and OK through of course the blind to realize the facts and truth of matters aka "brain washed" if one was to kill a puppy in the womb of a dog they would be in jail a long time. what greater is a baby from a pup ? fetus means "baby" for the record.
Please give me a single name of person who was sent to jail for aborting a dog fetus. Moreover, dogs are neutered and spayed all the time. Should we have the dog sign a consent letter before we disable their reproductive organs? I would say English is a second language for you - but it seems much more likely that it's a fourth or fifth language.
oh FYI only 3% of all the abortion ever done was cause of rape and incest together. so ya that really don't apply again all excuses and propaganda of those making a dollar of killing a child. ex- planed parent hood made millions (a non profit org, have you) made millions from who? you , i , the man who made this film and every other tax payer
Maybe you should talk to someone who has been raped by a family member and tell them that their story is propaganda. Much more money is made and many for lives lost as a result of the production of weapons of war. Why not choose your battles and speak for children who have been born and blown away by Israeli tanks?
lol you justify the extinction of babies not born yet to children being killed in war wow!! ya this goes to show anyone will go to what ever means to justify anything. it sounds right, but again your wrong. if your going to do this, compare apples w/ apples, not pears with oranges.nothing i stated was in correct . so if you was born in the 18 hundreds would you say killing babies in the womb would be ok ? well no! why ? cause again you been taught to accept this. thanks you
From a practical standpoint, I would rather spend time arguing to save the lives of children who are wearing backpacks on their way to school rather than a stain on some guy's boxershorts. Perhaps you'd prefer to save a white fetus rather than an arab eight year old. That's your business.
this is not true. i believe all children have the right to live, i don't pick and choose , no offense but that is exactly what you are doing by saying a 6 year old is more important then a child in the womb, rather i say a child is a child. no picking and choosing on my part sir neeext! i mean common since, you label me from choosing, when i say a child is a child but you say a fetes is not important so again who's choosing ???
rosepose12345 Your answer is so typical of the lefist abortion supporters. You are thinking about yourself and the women who are pregnant. None of you even think twice of thinking, much less considering, giving the unborn a choice. If the unborn, fetus, whatever you want to call it is feeding off his/her mother, they want to live.
CCgraphics20 - what if the mother would die if the unborn fetus is carried to term? If you place the exact same value on both, how do you decide? If you say mother, looks like you just said that her life is more important. Where is your precious argument now?
NBC is a private company. While it's true that the government has licensed out a segment of the airwaves, they cannot start stepping to demand specific content or lack there of, beyond what the Supreme Court has defined as indecent. They can say the broadcaster must present the news but they can't tell the broadcaster what news to report. Content-based regulation is unconstitutional. Do you really want the government controlling day-to-day programming? Not a good idea at all.
I was short and sweet. what did you not understand. I did not say the government should dictate programing. I said that NBC should not be allowed to censor PAYING American advertisers. NBC has a license, not a right to those channels. They ARE dictating content in many instances which i find abhoreant.
well, that fetus could've been the next Hitler too, so why risk it? ;)
in all seriousness... that argument is actually quite stupid
ittakesnogenius 1 week ago
I hate when people use this argument because your child could also become the next Hitler. Therefore this argument that "He could be president" means nothing.
carriecage 2 weeks ago in playlist Abortion
Jesus refered to satan as a 'thief' when He warned us that , "The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep." (John 10:10-11) Yes the 'god of this world' satan kills (thousands) steals (property, families from each other, etc.) and destroys (earthquakes, storms, etc.).
giramino 10 months ago
Go ahead and interfere in your god's plan and see what your god does next.You've may have saved one,maybe two,but look at the hundreds & thousands that your God just got done aborting with the earth quake and tsunami,go interfering in his work and he'll just wipe out another 10,000 humans.Can't wait to see what else ur god does all because you can't leave well enough alone.Getting the picture?
ashatbulaparanormal 10 months ago
I'm glad they didn't put that on the air.We have enough BullSh*t on it now.I like how u did the last part "could be the next President,how about adding it could also be the next child rapist or serial killer.
ashatbulaparanormal 10 months ago
Hitler's mother almost had an abortion and was talked out of it too. It's ads like this one that almost make me wonder about my pro-life beliefs.
TheBrotherBo 1 year ago
Wow!
LaurenKirstyMeikle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also to pro-lifers, take a look at yourself, your real self and ask yourself, am I really pro-life? For example, do you eat meat? If so then technically you are condoning the "murder" helpless animals that were not given a choice. Do you support unjustified, unprovoked wars? Well then essentially you are supporting the death of many thousands of civilians! (women AND children) Support the death penalty? then you are in fact, pro-death. Why not just be what you say that you ARE 100%.
angelic6465 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Also to pro-lifers, take a look at yourself, your real self and ask yourself, am I really pro-life? For example, do you eat meat? If so then technically you are condoning the "murder" of many helpless animals that were not given a choice. Do you support unjustified, unprovoked wars? Well then essentially you are supporting the death of many thousands of civilians! (women AND children) Support the death penalty? then you are in fact, pro-death. Why not just be what you say that you ARE 100%.
angelic6465 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jehmu Green is wanting it both ways. No to Pam Tebow's Great choice , , ,, but yes to women how choose to kill a life that they created,,,,,,,, NO CREDIBILITY MS. Greene. God grants life and it is his alone to give or take. Our constitution grants the right to life to all how have life, , , ,LIFE STARTS AT BIRTH ? Seriously,,,,what was the baby 30 seconds before birth,,,,? Think on that.
gatoron2595 1 year ago
i wish more people saw this add. Its to bad it never aired. People need to see this.
bobfannumber1 2 years ago
i hate religion!
juandeldiablo696 2 years ago
Me too, jaundeldiablo696. In fact, I don't know of a single Christian that doesn't feel the same as we do.
giramino 2 years ago
Whats ironic this is that Obama is one of the strongest supporters of baby murder there is. That may have had somthing to do with it....also why he didnt get my vote
Likwidlyric 2 years ago 2
I thought of that too, but maybe this message will hit home harder with the pro-abortion left when they realize that their "own" may have been aborted!
mstatz 2 years ago
This is yet the best Ad that money can buy.
SkylaSilverland 2 years ago
Awesome Ad!!!! That just silenced all arguments. Great job!
alittle01 2 years ago
P.S. Beautiful Ad!
M30WM3 2 years ago
"To those who would preach the need for separation of church and state, I make my case as follows... So long as tax payers are being forced to fund abortions, separation of church and state does not exist because in doing this, the government is violating the rights of the people to practice what they believe if and when they are against the practice of abortion."
[Pass it on!]
:-)
M30WM3 2 years ago
awesome ad, nbc needs to go somewhere.
freright123 2 years ago
That nigger should have been aborted.
NeodymiumPussyMagnet 2 years ago
No he should have not. I don't like him but each of us should have our time to turn on this earth. he has been corrupted and so would you easily i bet.
SkylaSilverland 2 years ago
As someone who believes in free speech, I feel NBC should have aired this ad.
As someone pro choice, I'm really really really really glad they didn't.
AmadeusKing 2 years ago
What can we expect from the Nazi Broadcasting Cabal?
IggyHazard 3 years ago
should've been aired. Could've hit a lot people and made them actually think for a second
SaranyFilms 3 years ago 2
yeah but obama is pro choice...
omgitstiffy 3 years ago
Now you see why the founding fathers provided for the separation of Church and State. Irrational people shouldn't set policy.
yankeepedaler 3 years ago
This is a great commercial. Fantastic. I am sorry more are not seeing it!! What an impact it has
Faved
RestrainedNoMore 3 years ago
NBC =National Bias Channel
FreedomLives1776 3 years ago 7
NBC = National Barack Channel
MSNBC = Most-Specific National Barack Channel
CNN = Clinton National News
CBS = Clinton Biased Station
falkenlaser 3 years ago
NBC is part of the Obama Propaganda Machine.
They don't want anyone to be "punished with a baby".
SeekerNLife 3 years ago
yes, including those who were raped at gun or knife point seekernlife.
it should be the law of the land that if one is raped & becomes pregnant, she must at any age bare that child regardless of the hardship & inablility to cope, not to mention the emotional roller coaster to keep or give that child up.
that female must have been a damned sinner for god to have given her this "cross to bare".
it's the duty of every christian to insure she go thru this living hell, no matter what!
wntoply6 3 years ago
do you believe pregnancy should be forced on a child/woman no matter the conception circumstance? if you think the exception should be in the case of rape or incest, why? that child should have the same rights as one concieved in love right? if not, why do you need to force a nightmare on one with no willing part in conception?
do you sit back in your comfortable "christian" life & deem your beliefs be imposed on all, no matter the consequence? with intelligence, try to answer each question.
wntoply6 3 years ago
There should be guide lines for abortion, rape and incest yes, but when someone if foolish and stupid enough not to know how babies come into this world, NO! Life does begin at conseption, it is a living cell. Would you kill a dog or cat just because you did not want it? If so, that is wrong. God gave us brains use them. If you do not want a baby dont' screw around, like the STD'S they are giving so much bail out money to, DON'T SCREW AROUND, then you have nothing to worry about.
2340Dallas 2 years ago
I don't believe that rap and incest should be the terms of it either. Back in the day incest was how kings and queens married. How did you get here? I also knew of a young man who's grandfather was his father. he lived and had a life. We all should.
SkylaSilverland 2 years ago
If you notice my screen name I am an FCC liscensed general class radio operator (old school with morse code etc) I am very well aware of what the fcc can restrict, and what is considered "serving the public trust" a requirement for maintaining a liscense.
Maybe you wern't aware the constitution is no longer in force (PMSNBC) :<) and yes keith oberman's pap smear was negative.
ka7krz 3 years ago
wntoply:
ANSWER THE QUESTION PUNK!
Tell me: You say you support and advocate the Constitution? Do you know more about the Constitution than Jefferson or Washington? Lets find out who graduated from where!
starcatcher7777 3 years ago
sorry idiot, i don't engage in stupidity.
all i read was your first inane sentence and refused to go any further.
if you had a question, no matter how stupidly it was phrased, it was completely ignored cause i was diverted and startled by just how wild your comment was, and how utterly devoid of sense it was.
wntoply6 3 years ago
You have to admit, it took a bit of courage for this organization to step so far into the Pro-choice camp.
L8nitedave 3 years ago
wntop:
Individual freedom? What to sell pot and drugs to school kids? Who is to say that killing you is not just a late term abortion!
starcatcher7777 3 years ago
where in god's green earth does this gem of wisdom come from starcatcher? where, it's just another brain fart, and you know what it reeks of absolute stupidity, and is devoid of logic. did you even graduate from junior high school 7777?
wntoply6 3 years ago
wntoply:
Did I step on your tail? It takes a hurt dog to yelp!
Tell me: You say you support and advocate the Constitution? Do you know more about the Constitution than Jefferson or Washington? Lets find out who graduated from where!
starcatcher7777 3 years ago
wntoply:
They have forced abortions in China and in the USSR they just starved you to death! Typical Socialists!
starcatcher7777 3 years ago
Maybe the money to make and show this commercial would be better spent saving children who are already alive and dieing from hunger, or are homeless. I find it funny that so many people are concerned about the unborn but as soon as they are born they are on their own.
Imilkgoatsforaliving 3 years ago
Who says money hasn't been spent on homeless and abandoned? Much has been donated to them as well as precautionary ads instilling some sense into people displeasing God.
" I find it funny that so many people are concerned about the unborn but as soon as they are born they are on their own"
and where does that happen? same advocates for not killing also care for and give charity to homeless and starving.
Your comment is erroneous.
spawndewd 3 years ago
Your erroneous. You can't tell me that $3,000,000 for a 30 second commercial is better than saving children who are living in this country and are hungry and homeless. How about $75million to try and stop gays from loving each other. I think that could have saved many more lives than this commercial.
I like your term "precautionary ads"
How about "force your will upon others ads". Or
" Darwin is athiest scum but we like to quote science when it follows our story book ads".
Imilkgoatsforaliving 3 years ago
I can see why you milk goats for a living. It's because you are a dumb ass. Do yourself a favor and delete your youtube account.
OldSchoolAmerican 3 years ago
Good one old school, now your insulting farmers.
Imilkgoatsforaliving 3 years ago
right on imilkgoatsforaliving. those so called "christians" refuse to look at reality, rather they base their beliefs on a book that is HIGHLY flawed & inaccurate in any number of instances. they pick & choose passages to obey as it fits their needs. to a person they pick & choose!
when a "christian" deems abortion evil, i delight in reminding myself of this fact & know they're the most evil minded uneducated, ignorant people on the face of the earth, more so than their much hated muslims.
wntoply6 3 years ago
I think this is a great commercial, except without the last two frames which made it political.
L8nitedave 3 years ago
They want the babies born now so that they can condemn the minority mother for being irresponsible later.
andrewh23 3 years ago
What part of "The right to life " don't you get?!
You evil advocate of slaughtering the unborn.Perhaps you'de like some cracker's to go w/ your fetis,you filthy animal!
gunnyranger2 3 years ago 2
when did you determine when LIFE begins gunny? who gave you sole decision?
it's only your opinion, and that's all it is. cut the bullshit bitch
wntoply6 3 years ago
I suppose if i have an opinion of when life begins,so do you,right?
Besides anyone w/ a brain knows that life begins at conception.Everything ever created "started" w/ a concept.
gunnyranger2 3 years ago 2
Since Roe vs Wade we've had enough dead fetuses stacked 10 ft high that stretches 84 miles.
That's alot of killings. Small defenseless children I might add.
Once an egg has been fertilized it is no longer dormant but active with life multiplying and dividing cells throughout receiving nourishment through a feeding tube.
If that's not "life" then we are all dead.
God "determined" when and science shows when.
spawndewd 3 years ago
Lol, hey big mouth,i can curse w/ the best of them!The Constitution is law not religion.Too bad a person can't grow a brain,you'de be the perfect fucking candidate.
And, don't you ever fucking forget it!
gunnyranger2 3 years ago
Abortion is from the religion of Satan.Keep it out of my life.maybe you ought to read the constitution.Does,"The pursuit of LIFE, liberty and justice" ring a bell?
gunnyranger2 3 years ago
The motives are religious, good thing they refused it.
CodeRed001 3 years ago
That was a good powerful advert.
jimisback 3 years ago 2
That is a shame...it just goes to show you where American is going and I just don't mean the ad itself. People will have to keep their opinions to themselves...no matter who you are...this is bad for liberals as well as conservatives.
RightWillFight 3 years ago
They also refused to air a PETA video. Big deal.
JoelWhy 3 years ago
Comparing the protection of dogs and cats to the protection of human life? You're really not THAT dense, are you??
petediddy1 3 years ago
I was referring to the fact that the major networks routinely reject advertisements, especially for large events like the Superbowl; but, don't pretend you have some moral certainty about when human life begins, or that we would all be better off if only there was an even larger human population on earth.
JoelWhy 3 years ago
oh for crying outloud ...lol...seriously...when does life begin... I'll tell you when it begins...it not a hard question. If ANY part of a baby/fetus does NOT have to exist ever...and a baby is just born...then that is when life starts...however if the baby/fetus HAS to go through those early stages of development then that is when life begins. so life begins when the sperm and egg meet because that is when the baby/fetus starts to grow and develop.
RightWillFight 3 years ago
I don't claim to have a MORAL clarity to when human life begins, but scientifically and biologically speaking, there is absolutely no debate that a unique and distinct being exists at the moment of conception, that has all the DNA it ever needs to fully develop, if given 3 things: time, nutrition, and the necessary environment. That is a scientific fact beyond dispute.
petediddy1 3 years ago
hmm petediddy, i thought that is exactly why the abortion debate began, cause no one can determine exactly when a human life began.
when did we revert back to your individual belief? did you decree it for everyone, and now we must all agree because you said so?
please clarify when the debate ended, and name those on both sides of the issue made that decision for everyone.
better yet pete, stop playing everyone for the fool you are. please, just stop!
wntoply6 3 years ago
Actually, wntoply6, that is NOT why the debate began. Roe v. Wade made their basis not on a scientific basis nor on the bedrock of U.S. law, but on the concept of the woman's privacy. Try this: before an adult, a child; before a child, an infant, before infant, a baby, before baby, a fetus, before a fetus, an embryo, before embryo, a blastocyst, and before that, a zygote, which is when the sperm and egg are one. Biologically, that is the first onset of a uniquely formed creature.
petediddy1 3 years ago 2
you might be right about when the debate began, no one for sure has the answer. but long before roe v wade the debate was on.
i make 2 points, 1st no one has the right to tell another what to do with their body, & more importantly neither you or the best scientists can tell me or anyone on the face of the earth, when life begins. you can opine about it, you can decide in your own mind when it begins, but in fact you don't know. if you do, you're the latest god & the world must worship you!
wntoply6 3 years ago
Can you read english? I just told you the SCIENTIFIC terminology for each stage of growth from conception onward. There is no dispute, no debate. A unique creature that did not exist, that has all 46 human chromosomes, exists from the moment of conception. If you follow what I wrote last, it is plain as day! It is not an opinion, it is not "someone else's body". It is new and unique life, distinct completely from mom or dad. YOU ARE JUST BEING STUBBORN.
petediddy1 3 years ago
your chronological logic justification astounds me. do you really use it as an argument against abortion? give me a few minutes & i'll top that with the highest insantiy & least common sense using your same thought process.
do you really debate anyone with intelligence regarding abortion, or is this your first attempt with one not of your beliefs? did you stay up nights coming up with that inane gem. or did your ignorant preacher imparted that as absolute justification against abortion?
wntoply6 3 years ago
no censorship! They should of showed it period.
lukewarmstorm 3 years ago
WATCH OUT - the follow up commercial will have Hitler's fetus. "If he'd been aborted, millions of lives would have been saved. If you are pregnant with the next Hitler, get an abortion." haha
andrewh23 3 years ago
Great commerical!!!! NBC shame on you
TeamHoytUSA1 3 years ago 2
thankfully NBC had the courage to refuse to show such a commercial. shame on those who think their way is the ONLY truth, for they are the true bigots of this world.
wntoply6 3 years ago
dude this is retarded. They have no right to choose for women. Women have a right to decide what they want to do. So if a 13-year-old girl is raped she has the right to choose if she wants to get an abortion, no one has the right to choose for her. So i think this pro-life stuff is complete bull.
rosepose12345 3 years ago
what i mean by ppl fell to the propaganda of abortion. is through ones ideas, watered down with lies, and passed on to another. then before you know it you have a society born not knowing right from wrong. what was once absurd is now justified and OK through of course the blind to realize the facts and truth of matters aka "brain washed" if one was to kill a puppy in the womb of a dog they would be in jail a long time. what greater is a baby from a pup ? fetus means "baby" for the record.
donjuan1demarco 3 years ago
Please give me a single name of person who was sent to jail for aborting a dog fetus. Moreover, dogs are neutered and spayed all the time. Should we have the dog sign a consent letter before we disable their reproductive organs? I would say English is a second language for you - but it seems much more likely that it's a fourth or fifth language.
andrewh23 3 years ago
oh FYI only 3% of all the abortion ever done was cause of rape and incest together. so ya that really don't apply again all excuses and propaganda of those making a dollar of killing a child. ex- planed parent hood made millions (a non profit org, have you) made millions from who? you , i , the man who made this film and every other tax payer
donjuan1demarco 3 years ago
Maybe you should talk to someone who has been raped by a family member and tell them that their story is propaganda. Much more money is made and many for lives lost as a result of the production of weapons of war. Why not choose your battles and speak for children who have been born and blown away by Israeli tanks?
andrewh23 3 years ago
lol you justify the extinction of babies not born yet to children being killed in war wow!! ya this goes to show anyone will go to what ever means to justify anything. it sounds right, but again your wrong. if your going to do this, compare apples w/ apples, not pears with oranges.nothing i stated was in correct . so if you was born in the 18 hundreds would you say killing babies in the womb would be ok ? well no! why ? cause again you been taught to accept this. thanks you
donjuan1demarco 3 years ago 2
From a practical standpoint, I would rather spend time arguing to save the lives of children who are wearing backpacks on their way to school rather than a stain on some guy's boxershorts. Perhaps you'd prefer to save a white fetus rather than an arab eight year old. That's your business.
andrewh23 3 years ago
this is not true. i believe all children have the right to live, i don't pick and choose , no offense but that is exactly what you are doing by saying a 6 year old is more important then a child in the womb, rather i say a child is a child. no picking and choosing on my part sir neeext! i mean common since, you label me from choosing, when i say a child is a child but you say a fetes is not important so again who's choosing ???
donjuan1demarco 3 years ago
Yes, I think he is trying to say that a 6 year old is more important than a bunch of cells at conception.
allamericanboys2001 3 years ago
Personally, I think the woman in the womb has the same right to her body and no one has the right to murder her.
ericgorr 3 years ago 2
rosepose12345 Your answer is so typical of the lefist abortion supporters. You are thinking about yourself and the women who are pregnant. None of you even think twice of thinking, much less considering, giving the unborn a choice. If the unborn, fetus, whatever you want to call it is feeding off his/her mother, they want to live.
ccgraphics20 3 years ago
CCgraphics20 - what if the mother would die if the unborn fetus is carried to term? If you place the exact same value on both, how do you decide? If you say mother, looks like you just said that her life is more important. Where is your precious argument now?
andrewh23 3 years ago
This was great. NBC has no right to use public airwaves when they censor the (paying) American people. Forget HD. Shut them down.
ka7krz 3 years ago
NBC is a private company. While it's true that the government has licensed out a segment of the airwaves, they cannot start stepping to demand specific content or lack there of, beyond what the Supreme Court has defined as indecent. They can say the broadcaster must present the news but they can't tell the broadcaster what news to report. Content-based regulation is unconstitutional. Do you really want the government controlling day-to-day programming? Not a good idea at all.
andrewh23 3 years ago
I was short and sweet. what did you not understand. I did not say the government should dictate programing. I said that NBC should not be allowed to censor PAYING American advertisers. NBC has a license, not a right to those channels. They ARE dictating content in many instances which i find abhoreant.
AzFCFRanger 3 years ago