3200 isn't 32x faster, more like 5x. Double the ISO, and you get one stop more sensitivity. 50-100-200-400-800-1600-3200-6400-12800-25600-51200-102400-204800. the last one is only 12x brighter than the first, not 4096x. lol. nice vid anw
I have a Canon T3 Rebel EOS and I've done an exposure of 27 minutes and i always get the image to turn out really white even when the ISO setting is on 100-200.
@guitargluv Make sure that your aperture is at the highest it can go. (e.g. f22 of f36) Then take the pic, but it will take a long time. Check out my photography on my page!
@guitargluv I got mine for about £4, in the region of $7-8.
If you don't want to spend any money at all and you have a Canon DSLR Magic Lantern has it built it, along with an Intervalometer, best part is it is free. One thing i would say is to read up and watch alot of tuts for installing it, as it can damage the camera, but done right it is a fantastic tool to have.
Your math is off regarding metering at ISO 3200 and then shooting at ISO 100. Rather than dividing, you should be calculating stops. 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200. 6 stops. That way, you can calculate your shutter speed accordingly. Multiplying your shutter speed won't work.
@dokgold you would want the sensor to get really hot, but I have done 30 to an hour exposures with no problem, although those are best done when it is cold outside to keep noise down.
The irony here is that this pubescent pyro needs to be lit with something much brighter than a campfire while giving instructions on how to take long exposure photos in the dark.
Hey Conor....I recently got my d7k and have been experimenting with long exposure. I did a test last night at about 4 minutes, iso 100, d-lighting off, LENR off, and lens cap on....there were TONS of hot pixels visible at 100% crop. I noticed LENR works well, but taking 40min for a 20min picture doesn't seem practical, especially if I want to take seamless star trails over a few hours. Is this normal? I tried to link to an example, but it wouldn't let me. Thanks!
@atyl1972 Thanks, I did do the firmware update, and it took any trace of hot pixels from photos and videos (except in long exposure as I noted). I have been told this is just the nature of long exposure shots with a digital camera...when using long exposure noise reduction, the specks/pixels are gone.
I bought a Nikon D3100 and tried to do the nightscape photo, but it didn't work and the screen kept saying the subject is too dark and i can't seem to press the button to take the pic because I'm unable to focus. (i'm quite new for this SLR thing)
Use Manual focus (turn of Auto-Focus). Use manual mode not P nor A mode and buy a nice remote (either a wireless or a normal one aka cable one). In M mode rotate de dial past 30 secs "30 and you get a --. That means you are in bulb mode so you can set the time as you wish!
When taking long exposure star trail shots for the best effect make sure you find the North star (Northern hemisphere) or the Southern Cross (Southern Hemisphere) to focus on. If you don't the star trails will be off center and be oblong shaped instead of revolving around a central point...
The d300s and the d7000 are almost at the same price.. Which one do you think have a better image quality? Im thinking to get one of those as an upgrade from a d3000
there are many reviews which says d3100 is a starter camera and u may soon need to upgrade as it is not as feature rich so should i go for d90 as i will not be able to upgrade for atleast 3-4 years..... or should wait for d90 successor.
@uniquejain91 the d90 already has a successor, the nikon d7000, if you want to keep the camera for many years then I would go for the d7000, it is the best dx camera you can get right now.
@919664 that is ridiculous, the d3100 has image quality that destroys the d5000, has video, has a much better autofocus system, much better iso range and more. dont kid yourself.
@QQQQcon d5000 has video too, image quality=same, real photographers manual focus, iso is good on d5000...3100 is a step down from d5000 and its not all about mega pixels.., dont kid yourself
@4FRONTFilms is right its not all about pixels, the sensor is the vital component, your actually the who does not have a clue, so go and do a photography course and come back to me when you actually know what your talking about kiiiiiiiid. dont kid yourself kid
hi there! when you say `up north where it`s colder`, how much `cold` do you have in mind for a, say, 5-or-so-hour exposure? without overheating the sensor, of course... and are those (extremely) long exposures in any way damaging the camera? thanks! :-)
Is not a good idea to use bulb for a long time on DSLR, becouse it overheats the camera sensor. This overheating produce a purple glow on the background and risks to spoil the sensor. Don't use Bulb with a DSLR approximately for more than one minute.
hey, nice Tutorial.... can you please tell me how i can focus on the stars?? or do i just focus an object in front and but the cam on F 7 for example and if i only want the front object sharpend i use an F 22 !? greetings Timon
so what exactly is bulb? and i dont have an external flash just the one that it comes with...the video isnt loading for me so thats why im asking theese questions
I think you should try putting your camera in the interval timer or continuous shooting with the rubber band for shorter exposures.. say 30 seconds at f/5.6 iso100 and then use a program (google "startrails" and click the first link) to put everything together, without having the noise problem, and have longer trails.
Will it hurt the shutter or mirror to hold the shutter open that long? Normally it's only open for fractions of a second. Also, won't it shake the camera a bit when you take the eraser off?
@in2horses247 no it will not hurt the shutter. And if you exposure is long enough you wont have to worry about camera shake, but you should be careful when removing the eraser. I suggest just getting a wireless remote.
I watched this video got all pumped up went out set up the cam I put it in M mode bulb and did a 45 minute exp I got I white photo so the I did 30 sec shoots did like 80 photos there came out better then the white one I got stars but there not really trails there dots when I put it togather in startrails any tips on what im doing rong
@vinnydeciutiis you need to do at least a 15 min exposure to get star trails. you need to use low iso, 100. and you need to use a small f/stop around f/8- f/11.
@citizenofvirginity uh...yes.....but you need to be in M mode so you can control the shutter speed AND the aperture......because this whole tutorial is about having a LONG EXPOSURE which has everything to do with controlling shutter speed......................................................and not much to do with having the aperture as a priority....
a little confused...so you basically had the camera pointed up towards a cactus in pitch dark with only the moon, stars, and the fire providing the light? what did the end result look like or did i miss that. thanks
Rather than using a very small aperture (over f11) wouldn't you be better off using an ND filter to cut down the incoming light? I'm thinking you'll get diffraction blur otherwise.
Nice vid! It's too bad camera companies simply enable their cameras to take 31+ second exposures in camera without buying a remote.
There is a program you can download called StarTrails that compiles a bunch of images of 30 second exposures into one big picture. Maybe that will fix the sensor heating up a little?
I've also hear that in cold conditions the lens can fog up and blur your photo all up lol
3200 isn't 32x faster, more like 5x. Double the ISO, and you get one stop more sensitivity. 50-100-200-400-800-1600-3200-6400-12800-25600-51200-102400-204800. the last one is only 12x brighter than the first, not 4096x. lol. nice vid anw
reaktor55 3 weeks ago
How do you control the noise in your photos, because they look very nice?
dsecroetkt 1 month ago
I really like the bit of math at the end!
keep it up
zeroexcfg 1 month ago
I have a Canon T3 Rebel EOS and I've done an exposure of 27 minutes and i always get the image to turn out really white even when the ISO setting is on 100-200.
Any advice will be helpful!
God bless,
Sam Glover
guitargluv 1 month ago
@guitargluv your overexposing the image , the exposure needs to be shorter, probably a lot shorter.
QQQQcon 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@guitargluv you need a ND filter or something which darks the picture down
CreateMotionMEDIA 3 weeks ago
@guitargluv Make sure that your aperture is at the highest it can go. (e.g. f22 of f36) Then take the pic, but it will take a long time. Check out my photography on my page!
zergravity 2 weeks ago
Go to amazon.com for really cheap remote shutters!
guitargluv 1 month ago
@guitargluv I got mine for about £4, in the region of $7-8.
If you don't want to spend any money at all and you have a Canon DSLR Magic Lantern has it built it, along with an Intervalometer, best part is it is free. One thing i would say is to read up and watch alot of tuts for installing it, as it can damage the camera, but done right it is a fantastic tool to have.
pkbreeze08 1 month ago
Your math is off regarding metering at ISO 3200 and then shooting at ISO 100. Rather than dividing, you should be calculating stops. 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200. 6 stops. That way, you can calculate your shutter speed accordingly. Multiplying your shutter speed won't work.
ethancfbz 4 months ago 2
ARIZONA REPRESENT!
royaisfrustrated 4 months ago
Hi Conor, does long exposure wont destroy the sensor? what aperture do you usually use on startrails?
dokgold 6 months ago
@dokgold you would want the sensor to get really hot, but I have done 30 to an hour exposures with no problem, although those are best done when it is cold outside to keep noise down.
QQQQcon 6 months ago
do you shoot in raw or jpeg
labigboy256 7 months ago
@labigboy256 you should always shoot in Raw. :)
photographyalancraig 7 months ago
does the d3100 work well for night sky photography?
negathief 8 months ago
@negathief No it does not
crkhky 6 months ago
@negathief mine dose
PhotoShopChannel 6 months ago
you the best
masternonoy1 10 months ago
what is the good lens for bulb photography?
masternonoy1 10 months ago
very good video, thanks alot
AussieSoccerBoy94 10 months ago
nice tip for calculating the shutter speed
Alexvent666666 11 months ago
The irony here is that this pubescent pyro needs to be lit with something much brighter than a campfire while giving instructions on how to take long exposure photos in the dark.
BuffoonCinema 1 year ago
What aperture should you use for longer exposures?
thanks
michedeba 1 year ago
Very cool man. Gotta love opening up the shutter.
LEXPIX 1 year ago
thank you :)
nice tutorial really wish i could see the result :(
set the focus to infinity instade if using a flashlight to focus
Zedorwin 1 year ago
Hey Conor....I recently got my d7k and have been experimenting with long exposure. I did a test last night at about 4 minutes, iso 100, d-lighting off, LENR off, and lens cap on....there were TONS of hot pixels visible at 100% crop. I noticed LENR works well, but taking 40min for a 20min picture doesn't seem practical, especially if I want to take seamless star trails over a few hours. Is this normal? I tried to link to an example, but it wouldn't let me. Thanks!
outdoorsman567 1 year ago
@outdoorsman567 seems a bit excessive to see so much noise after only four min. but it is not unusual to see noise after 4 min.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@outdoorsman567 have you updated the firmware as this was a problem that nikon noticed that they fixed during the latest firmware
atyl1972 1 year ago
@atyl1972 Thanks, I did do the firmware update, and it took any trace of hot pixels from photos and videos (except in long exposure as I noted). I have been told this is just the nature of long exposure shots with a digital camera...when using long exposure noise reduction, the specks/pixels are gone.
outdoorsman567 1 year ago
@outdoorsman567
You should update your firmware, they solved that issue with the D7000 in the most recent update
prodigynumber1 1 year ago
Nice, thankz for the info ! XD
D3mQN 1 year ago
I need help:
I bought a Nikon D3100 and tried to do the nightscape photo, but it didn't work and the screen kept saying the subject is too dark and i can't seem to press the button to take the pic because I'm unable to focus. (i'm quite new for this SLR thing)
Thanks
MsPic32 1 year ago
@MsPic32
Use Manual focus (turn of Auto-Focus). Use manual mode not P nor A mode and buy a nice remote (either a wireless or a normal one aka cable one). In M mode rotate de dial past 30 secs "30 and you get a --. That means you are in bulb mode so you can set the time as you wish!
Cheers!
ArrakisDunedt 1 year ago
When taking long exposure star trail shots for the best effect make sure you find the North star (Northern hemisphere) or the Southern Cross (Southern Hemisphere) to focus on. If you don't the star trails will be off center and be oblong shaped instead of revolving around a central point...
JetJockey87 1 year ago
Canon 7D, owns all :)
LXUndertakerLX 1 year ago
The d300s and the d7000 are almost at the same price.. Which one do you think have a better image quality? Im thinking to get one of those as an upgrade from a d3000
Hs196 1 year ago
@Hs196 d7000 has better image quality
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon thank you, one last question. Which camera focus faster in low light condition?
Hs196 1 year ago
@Hs196 d7000
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon Thanks a lot
Hs196 1 year ago
Thank u so much for sharing ur ideas :)
protouche 1 year ago
there are many reviews which says d3100 is a starter camera and u may soon need to upgrade as it is not as feature rich so should i go for d90 as i will not be able to upgrade for atleast 3-4 years..... or should wait for d90 successor.
uniquejain91 1 year ago
@uniquejain91 the d90 already has a successor, the nikon d7000, if you want to keep the camera for many years then I would go for the d7000, it is the best dx camera you can get right now.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon d300s ,,what do youthink?
kulotzification 1 year ago
great video.... i have a question wich one shud i buy d3100 or d90 as d90 is two years old and may be replaced soon.... plz help.....
uniquejain91 1 year ago
@uniquejain91 d3100 is a better starter camera and has better image quality
QQQQcon 1 year ago
I live in Australia, Victoria, Melbourne. Ruffly how long do you think I could leave my exposure on for?
0BoxHead0 1 year ago
thanks mate! brilliant video.
07817457749 1 year ago
Hi dude, i like VERY MUCH your work, I want to ask u something, What do u think about the Nikon D 5000 ?
paorob86 1 year ago
@paorob86 the new d3100 is better
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon no it isn't it doesn't have the infra red thing and. Go for the D5000 boy
919664 1 year ago
@919664 that is ridiculous, the d3100 has image quality that destroys the d5000, has video, has a much better autofocus system, much better iso range and more. dont kid yourself.
QQQQcon 1 year ago 16
@QQQQcon d5000 has video too, image quality=same, real photographers manual focus, iso is good on d5000...3100 is a step down from d5000 and its not all about mega pixels.., dont kid yourself
4FRONTFilms 1 year ago
@4FRONTFilms oh ok, you keep telling yourself that. I am not going to argue with people who have no idea what they are talking about.
QQQQcon 1 year ago 4
@QQQQcon D700 kills both :D
SUZUKITRUNGLE 1 year ago
@QQQQcon you all are arguing about what? which NIKON is better?... i got an idea... get a CANON and learn the definition of "better"
11ptbrown 1 year ago
@QQQQcon
@4FRONTFilms is right its not all about pixels, the sensor is the vital component, your actually the who does not have a clue, so go and do a photography course and come back to me when you actually know what your talking about kiiiiiiiid. dont kid yourself kid
pornopenguintwice 1 year ago
Me Again...
You know if the Lumix FZ100 Have Bulb?
Varguitas10 1 year ago
@Varguitas10 i think it does not sure
QQQQcon 1 year ago
hi there! when you say `up north where it`s colder`, how much `cold` do you have in mind for a, say, 5-or-so-hour exposure? without overheating the sensor, of course... and are those (extremely) long exposures in any way damaging the camera? thanks! :-)
sign0in0to0you0tube 1 year ago
@sign0in0to0you0tube to be safe probably close to freezing temp. i dont think it will damage the camera.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
nice tut !
Thanks
SurfCracker 1 year ago
Your tutorial is very helpful. I really like that you talked about being in different cities/outside of the city.
Thanks!
Vanessa M.
VannyPack88 1 year ago
Great tutorial ! Really helpful tips !
TosseneMike 1 year ago
Is not a good idea to use bulb for a long time on DSLR, becouse it overheats the camera sensor. This overheating produce a purple glow on the background and risks to spoil the sensor. Don't use Bulb with a DSLR approximately for more than one minute.
jama01 1 year ago
hey, nice Tutorial.... can you please tell me how i can focus on the stars?? or do i just focus an object in front and but the cam on F 7 for example and if i only want the front object sharpend i use an F 22 !? greetings Timon
alienkiter 1 year ago
@alienkiter to focus on the star just use manual focus and focus to infinity. Everything will be in focus if you use f/22
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@QQQQcon awsome - Thank you =) - now i have to wait for an none cloudy day - and it should be sommer....
alienkiter 1 year ago
Comment removed
alienkiter 1 year ago
This is a very effective tutorial video. Nice work.
writeDVD 1 year ago
i am confused, alot of photographers refer to 'noise' what is that?
looftastic 1 year ago
@looftastic at high iso you get a graininess in the image, the graininess is what is called noise
oscarman2 1 year ago
so what exactly is bulb? and i dont have an external flash just the one that it comes with...the video isnt loading for me so thats why im asking theese questions
kelstrophic 1 year ago
@kelstrophic It is an exposure setting that allows you to open the shutter as long as you want.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
I've been using the same technique for over a year now in my time lapse videos, yeah rubber band is a great thing. :D
Adammythbusterspl 1 year ago
I think you should try putting your camera in the interval timer or continuous shooting with the rubber band for shorter exposures.. say 30 seconds at f/5.6 iso100 and then use a program (google "startrails" and click the first link) to put everything together, without having the noise problem, and have longer trails.
kzrick188 1 year ago
Great video tutorials. Any way of improving audio though?
Brenniman65 1 year ago
Will it hurt the shutter or mirror to hold the shutter open that long? Normally it's only open for fractions of a second. Also, won't it shake the camera a bit when you take the eraser off?
in2horses247 1 year ago
@in2horses247 no it will not hurt the shutter. And if you exposure is long enough you wont have to worry about camera shake, but you should be careful when removing the eraser. I suggest just getting a wireless remote.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@in2horses247 a wireless remote is pretty cheap. You can find 'em in Amazon for less than 20 bucks.
citizenofvirginity 1 year ago
I did 30 sec and got some good stuff
vinnydeciutiis 1 year ago
4:47 is awesome OWOW is very nice!!!!! :) xD
nikoaazzer 1 year ago
You're a sharp young man. Kinda like a video version of Ken Rockwells site. Im learning! Thank you.
oconnaugh 1 year ago
Great ids man..where you been? I want to see more from the D3!!!
WeHaveGoneGlobal 1 year ago
I watched this video got all pumped up went out set up the cam I put it in M mode bulb and did a 45 minute exp I got I white photo so the I did 30 sec shoots did like 80 photos there came out better then the white one I got stars but there not really trails there dots when I put it togather in startrails any tips on what im doing rong
vinnydeciutiis 1 year ago
@vinnydeciutiis you need to do at least a 15 min exposure to get star trails. you need to use low iso, 100. and you need to use a small f/stop around f/8- f/11.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
@vinnydeciutiis And you wanna use A mode instead of M, because A is aperture priority, it allows you to control the f number. :]
citizenofvirginity 1 year ago
@citizenofvirginity A mode doesn't let you control shutter speed...M lets you control aperture and shutter speed...
saaaaataychicken 1 year ago
@saaaaataychicken I know that indeed. I said "A" allows you to control the f-number.
citizenofvirginity 1 year ago
@citizenofvirginity uh...yes.....but you need to be in M mode so you can control the shutter speed AND the aperture......because this whole tutorial is about having a LONG EXPOSURE which has everything to do with controlling shutter speed......................................................and not much to do with having the aperture as a priority....
saaaaataychicken 1 year ago
great tutorials Conor keep up the good work pal, by the way you must have some Irish blood in you with a name like Quinlan.
MrDigger1969 1 year ago
very helpful, this was awesome thanks!
Moocow8 1 year ago
Very nice tutorial, helped a lot :)
thanks for uploading
iarshad78 1 year ago
a little confused...so you basically had the camera pointed up towards a cactus in pitch dark with only the moon, stars, and the fire providing the light? what did the end result look like or did i miss that. thanks
philboy521 1 year ago
@philboy521 yes that is what I did. the picture is on the video thumbnail.
QQQQcon 1 year ago
hey nice work mate what is your email id..??
drtef 2 years ago
Rather than using a very small aperture (over f11) wouldn't you be better off using an ND filter to cut down the incoming light? I'm thinking you'll get diffraction blur otherwise.
SLRist 2 years ago
you could do that, but most lenses are sharpest around f/8-f/11 anyway.
QQQQcon 2 years ago
Nice vid! It's too bad camera companies simply enable their cameras to take 31+ second exposures in camera without buying a remote.
There is a program you can download called StarTrails that compiles a bunch of images of 30 second exposures into one big picture. Maybe that will fix the sensor heating up a little?
I've also hear that in cold conditions the lens can fog up and blur your photo all up lol
PhotoCrimeX 2 years ago
disable*
PhotoCrimeX 2 years ago
Con, the eraser trick is absolute genius. I never thought of that. Brilliant!
maxrife 2 years ago
LOL at buying a $4k camera and skimp out on a $15 remote. ;) jp
erikRairden 2 years ago 18
I have one, I just wanted to deonstrate how I used the rubber band, but it was to dark in the video anyway.
QQQQcon 2 years ago
great
zeroexcfg 2 years ago
eraser? lol? just get the cheapest remote shutter release... which is probably like 15$..
nerxboy 2 years ago
Comment removed
lew1310 2 years ago
when i do low light photography i use a flash on the first picture to get the compostion correct
ThePhotogem 2 years ago 7
thats a good idea
QQQQcon 2 years ago
@ThePhotogem agreed
k2kona 1 year ago
Good Video :)
Keep it up
S0nnyRed 2 years ago
sick stuff connor
fritobanditoes 2 years ago
Thanks for the information, I have been meaning to learn how to take night shots. This has been a great help to me, thanks again
Vilif1er 2 years ago
20 mins? jesus
eLLriDe420 2 years ago 2
they can last much longer than that, some people take a single image for hours.
QQQQcon 2 years ago
you can even do 120 min exposure
vlad555556 2 years ago