Added: 3 years ago
From: johnnymac74
Views: 14,146
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (69)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ha heath Care... Mc Cain was right about that one.. both parties has to agree on this

  • anyone else hear that sloppy sucking sound in the background?? what was that?

  • @drzoidberg well it's one thing to talk and another to act.

    I dislike Mccain very much, I think he constantly talks like a hypocrite especially in the first video regarding Cuba and Iran. When over the years the US has been doing the same thing on a bigger scale (supporting dictators, state terrorism and so on).

    For the environment well he says that but yet chose Palin for a running mate, a great environmentalist haha.

  • I'm generally a more liberal minded person, but I actually like John McCain. He seems like a fairly nice guy and I respect that he believes we should be doing more to protect the environment. I'm still glad Obama won, but people have to stop saying that we averted the apocalypse by not electing McCain. He's not nearly as bad as some liberals have made him seem.

  • @DrZoidberg133 I agree. However, I think the idea of Palin's closeness to the presidential seat was apocalyptic. Agree?

  • if an immigrant gets a job for a position and you dont, you must be one unqualified mofo.

  • Very well put sir.

  • @evilgrin07 if a immigrant gets a job and i don't that means he/she is working under the" table" ,with no benefits,and making have as much.

  • @bobbyfluffynoodle So another words you don't know any americans who as kids cut their elderly neighbors yard for money?? Most Americans have done work and been paid under the table at some point in their lives. You say immigrant like they are bad people or some alien....they are people looking for better opportunity just like you and me.

  • @evil grin 07 nice try ,you are just trying to justify criminal behavior if Mexicans want better opportunity they can do it in there own country ,first buy over throwing the government not buy running from the problem.

  • @bobbyfluffynoodle criinal behavior, immigrants coming to America was how the U.S was founded, so if you aren't pleased with immigrants then pack your bags along with your family and go back to the country which your family originated from because it sure wasn't America. How can Mexicans do it in their own country yet America is willing to assist other coutries at war and bail out Haides? You obviously weren't informed....

  • @bobbyfluffynoodle but not paying taxes

  • Hell on earth?

  • Oreilly asks hardball questions to everyone. The only thing that makes this look better than the Obama interview, is Oreilly didn't have to force an answer out of Mccain. Mccain gives a no nonsense answer s asked a question. Obama, who wants to please everyone, upset no one, always takes 1 minute, or 150 words to fully articulate any answer. He can't stick to his guns and give a brazen answer that everyone may not agree with.

  • No, Obama uses a lot of words so that he can carefully articulate an intelligent answer that is fully explained rather than spouting tired slogans and talking points that a trained parrot could recite.

  • what a surprise you are siding with bill.Look at your nic.WHAT A SHOCK .

  • I think also that Obama is obviously more eccentric hence O'reilly asked him more questions and gave him a chance to explain his ideas

  • I think Obama articulated himself very well and I even gained more respect from him. However I think Obama is obviously more eccentric so O'reilly asked him more questions thus giving him more of an opportunity to explain his ideas. DOWN WITH THE HEALTHCARE BILL!

  • im a dem and i say bills right half the time, hes not as bad as everyone thinks but some things ur like wtf lol

  • Comment removed

  • we need a joint party presidency, lets stop messing around and put both a dem and a repub in there together

  • This is one of Bill O Reilly's better interviews. Should've pushed him harder though but I'm surprised that he actually criticized McCain.

  • I dont know, but i was expecting bill to give mccain a blowjob though.

  • "I wanna get this done quick"....what is he the president of US?...Bill o Reily sucks.

  • welp we all know who o'reilly's voting for ... MCCAIN !!!

  • O'Reilly is a lobbyist, isn't he? You can tell that he is clearly giving McCain the message of what the special interests want. They want to use McCain as a puppet to get what they want.

  • Obama/Bidden 2008 oh and fuck Bill O'Reilly

  • i disagree he brings up bad decisions of both parties as far as who they associate with and there past choices..bill is a to the right but i think the interviews were fair

  • Bill O'Reily is one bias muthafucka. Check the Obama interview. Well I encourage everyone who reads this to vote no matter what party you represent. Obama/Biden 2008.

  • Oreilly's interviews are all about Oreilly I agree..his ego is now sickening..he's loud mouth and arrogant as ever

  • It really is a shame for our country to rely on jerks like o'reilly to disrespect our future president (whether be Obama or McCain) just so he can feed his wildly out of control ego. It disgusts me. Why would anyone even bother speaking to him?

  • absolutely agree 100%. used to be a big o'reilly fan, but his ego is absolutely out of control and its getting in the way of the quality of his interviews as of late. i dont see it getting any better either.

  • @paradiddlerythm

    It seems to me that the majority of the criticism about media outlets is about them not asking enough tough questions to political leaders given the opportunity (try Youtubing Jon Stewart on Crossfire). Now you criticize Bill O'Reilly for doing just that? I hope you see the irony of your statement.

  • Oil companies make billions. Raising taxes on those companies wont make the gas up. Just look at what has happened. Bush did not raise tax in those companies, and prices are up big. I remember paying 1.30, 1.50 for a gallon in 2001. GAS IS UP BECAUSE BUSH AND THOSE THAT PAID HIS WAY INTO THE WHITE HOUSE, FOUNDED A LOOP WHOLE, TO MAKE BILLIONS. LAST 8 YEARS THEY FOUND A PRESIDENT TO PLAY THEIR GAME. and please stop believing gas is up because of the war this is not the first war we had.

  • I don't really like either one of them, but I do agree with McCain on more issues than I do Barack Hussien Obama.

  • I like the use of his full name. You work for FOX?

  • No I don't work for FOX.  I just like to remind people that his middle name is Hussien. LOL

  • What do you agree with McCain on? Do you like the McCain Finegold Bill which McCain later voted against? Do you agree with McCain on not torturing captured prisoners of war, but allowing the CIA to torture? The problem with McCain is that he keeps changing his position on key issues important to the people in the US. McCain is either a hypocrite or a mental case.

  • I agree with McCain on securing the border first, & not surrendering in Iraq. The McCain Finegold Bill, he did vote against it. The torture thing, I don't really care about. They are enemy combatants of the USA, they can be tortured heavily for all I care. Barack Hussien Obama has flip-flopped on more issues than I can shake a stick at. I just believe that McCain is the lesser of two evils in this Presidential run.

  • Putting McCain's name in a sentence with the word "evil" is saying you agree with me that something is wrong with this "nutty" guy. McCain started the issue for changing positions, but he "flips" on issues like McCain Finegold which he created then voted against. Also, if McCain didn't solve the Border problem in the 1980's with his buddies when his senate position started, he won't solve it as president. Lastly, McCain's position on torture and Waterboarding isn't clear.

  • Putting the word "evil" in my sentence was reference to the fact that I believe that McCain will do less damage to the country than Barack Hussien Obama will. Both of them have flip-flopped on issues to an extent. But Obama has flip-flopped on more issues than McCain. As far as the torture and waterboarding is concerned, I don't really care about that. They can torture and waterboard enemy combatants of the USA as much as they'd like to get info out of them.

  • Now you're confirming that McCain will "damage" the country as President! Don't vote, since you agree that McCain is a "damage" presidential candidate. What's the sense in voting for McCain who's "evil" and "damage" creating more "flips" as time goes on? Lastly, McCain started the "flip flop" attack on Obama making him a hypocrite/nut, and I guaranty you that I could find more "flips" from McCain than you could find on Obama.

  • Well I thinking I might vote for "none of the above". I certainly will not vote for Barack Hussien Obama. But I do believe that McCain will do a better job as President. You must be a Democrat. I see you are obviously nit-picking at words just like Democrats do. "Damage" and "evil" are metaphors not to be taken litterally. But good luck to ya.

  • I'm not a Democrat. I'm not a Conservative/Liberal. I'm an Independent. I try to stay open minded. The reason why I nit-pick is because I think we're like minded people of common sense, but I think you won't admit it because you're afraid of what others may think of you. I believe if you truly voted your conscience you would never say "McCain will do a better job as president", especially after hearing his "psychological" benefits plan.

  • I don't give a rats rectum what anybody thinks of me. I still believe that McCain will do a better job as President. Barack Hussien Obama must be defeated in November!!!

  • Obama's name does sound a little scary! However, the country faces a recession. McCain first votes against the improvement of Military funds, second he votes against Anwar drilling making it that much harder for president Bush to get approval to drill in America, and finally when McCain's advisor mocks every American suffering by saying recession is only in our heads my head tells me don't vote for such an "evil" man. Lastly, would you really trade all the freedoms you enjoy for a "cool" name?

  • I would rather keep all my freedoms from that guy with the "cool" name. Considering what the guy with the "scary" name will do to me, I sure don't want him in office.

  • What will that guy with the scary name do to you once he becomes president? Keep in mind; people are now saying we are moving into a depression. Rock bottom, this is it. Things can't get any worse. So I ask again, what could that guy with the scary name do to us that has not been done already?

  • Well Barack Hussien Obama will, and has said he will raise taxes, cut the child dependant taxes, leave the borders wide open, and do absolutely nothing about the current illegals that are here. Besides that, he plans on pulling out of Iraq and Afghanistan early and then open the USA to more terrorist acts on our soil. He also was to nationalize health care which will bankrupt this country just like it has in other countries where it has been done. That's what BHO will do to the USA!!

  • Obama wants to tax those who fall with in a price range of $250,000/yr.; everyone not making $250,000/yr is already paying a high price. So be fair please! Also, I'm sick and tire of that border issue. I blame every presidents as well as senators who served over 11yrs for the border issue. On War, Obama wants to end it in a way that would not put us or our troops in harms way. Lastly, Obama wants to lower the price on healthcare/healthcare premiums, but he never said by how much.

  • Why tax those that have done well for themselves?? You start taxing the "rich" even more and they will leave the country or just move their money to where the US can't touch it. Then what?? Barack Hussien Obama doesn't want to lower the price of healthcare, he wants to nationalize it, he has said so countless times. He scares me to be President and that's why I will NOT vote for him in November!!

  • I'm beginning to think you are a "rich" person. We all have to pay a price so please be fair! If some "rich" people decide to leave that's too bad. Some of those people you're defending are doing business with our enemies. As for Healthcare, Obama made it clear that he wants to lower the price, and I see nothing wrong with him trying to nationalize it. Lastly, it's better to be scared with the truth by Obama than be told Recession is all in your mind by John Tricky Dick McCain.

  • I am not a "rich" person by any stretch. I just don't feel that you should tax people more for doing well for themselves. Nationalizing healthcare will bankrupt this country. Barack Hussien Obama does not tell the thruth. He is told what to say by his hundreds of advisors. He is a puppet. You are now boring me with this little debate. If Barack Hussien Obama gets the Presidency, you will see this country go to complete shit with his "change". Good Luck to ya!! Goodbye.

  • Aren't we in shit now? Airport cut 2500 jobs, and that number is growing. Starbucks shops are closing down. Banks are closing down. Lenders are being procecuted. Ed McMann is struggling with a housing crisis. However, you feel "rich" people need your defense even though they don't have to worry about this stuff even after Obama's plan takes affect. Lastly my goal was to put an end to the "silly" issues that divide us so we could be united in a common goal for a better tommorrow.

  • Yawn!!! Airport cuts are due to rising feul costs and airlines not hedging their feul like Southwest. No cuts there. Starbucks, well they grew too big for thier own shorts and people are cutting costs.  $4 for a stupid cup of coffee, give me a break!! Banks and lenders made shady deals with people who couldn't afford the houses they were buying. Ed McMahon, well he spent too much money when he was making it hand over fist, now he's in trouble which is his own fault. Cont'd.....

  • There is a rise in high school drop outs. Teen pregnancy is on the rise. Parents are neglecting their children due to working two/three jobs to pay the bills. People are getting harassed by security at Airports. Unemployment levels are at a high. Jobs are getting shipped overseas. Lastly, the polar ice is melting causing a rise in sea levels.

  • The well off people will have to worry if Barack Hussien Obama gets the office. He will rax them until no end which I don't think is right. You want us to be united in a common goal for a better tomorrow?? Well my friend, I will never stand "united" behind Barack Hussien Obama that's for sure! I don't want to experience his "change".

  • Your first sentence doesn't create a clear picture for me as to how unfairly hurt the well off people will be. My friends and I aren't well off, and we have trouble understanding what you're saying. Meanwhile, Bank of America is laying people off, and cut backs have been put on programs to help the poor. Also, the Department of Rehab is facing possible cut backs.

  • The people who have done well for themselves (ie. are sucessful and making a good amount of money) will have to worry if Obama gets the office. Because he will tax them highly and nobody wants to be taxed anymore than they should be. I'm not well off either as well as you, but it is up to us to make our lives better. It is not the responsibilty of the govorment.  Work more, or go out and get a better paying job. It's called personal responsibilty.

  • Too bad it's really hard to find a damn good job that pays pal. And jobs aren't willing to give people more hours or salaries right now. I know, I've gone job to job over the past five years and they aren't going to shell out anymore in this economy. Do you think McCain will be any better than Obama? Neither man will make a difference. Peace.

  • I just don't believe that those who are making good money should be taxed anymore than what is already required. I don't believe the govorment should in essence penalize a person for being sucessful. People need to take care of themselves and not rely on the govorment to solve their problems for them.

  • You think that my comment on the Department of Rehab is a good example of why people shouldn't rely on government help. However, the Department of Rehab helps people with learning disability and others who are Handy Cap. I would think of myself as "cold" to say to the Handy Cap, "you need to solve your own problems," to get them off government aid. Lastly, I'm having a hard time seeing the picture of suffering a successful "penalized" person would endure so please write a clearer picture!

  • I was not reffering to the handicapped, physically, or mentally. I was referring to those people who think the govorment should give handouts to them because they didn't make it in life. And to those who think that the govorment should solve everyones problems in society. A person who say makes 200k a year should not have to pay anymore taxes than legally required than a person who makes 50k a year. You put an extra tax on them (200K guy) and they are being penalized IMHO.

  • Tell me about the "suffering" the "well off" will endure through unfair taxes. Also, I'm having a hard time accepting the narrow position that the "well off" makes money on their own without government help. Please, haven't you heard the term lobbyist! Lastly, the story of Rosa Parks taught me that no well off person/persons' can survive without the exchange/help of another, and if the "well off" don't exchange with those who "didn't make it in life" then the "well off" becomes extinct.

  • boycott voting until the fuckheadedness is through filling their pockets. mccain and obama will sell us down the river is it obvious to only me that mccain is all about money the people pay and not the people? since when is finance the main priority of the us government? we are all fucked and mccain will tighten the screws to our casket

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more