scientists actually tried to raise the titanic from its watery grave, thank goodness that didn't work and they decided to leave it there, cuz the ship is like a grave stone for all those who ded
Back in the 1980s I believe 85 or 87, Doug Luellen broadcast the first discovery of the Titanic's location, since its sinking. I have it somewhere on vhs and would like to download it. Does anyone remember that broadcast?
@cadamy4 there is always a great deal of theft accusation in Titanic movies. people claim "a Night to Remember" stole footage from the 1943 Nazi Propaganda film version.
@DanX10001 well, during the sinking, titanic did have a slight list to port, but not this great of a list. the real list was only about 5 degrees, this has to be at least 10 in the video
@Stormflux247 because the book was already written, and this movie was made from a book. and since the book was written before titanic was found, and the movie was filmed before titanic was found, it does not show a breakup
Great scenes, except the ship was not listing to port, and while some ice did fall on the forward welldeck, it wasn't a mountain of it like seen here.
@prudenceislandboy it is said from survivors, and some scientists have done tests to see, and apparently, the Titanic did in fact list to port. Certainly not at the extreme angle shown here, it would only have been a 2 or 3 degree list, but apparently there's evidence it did list slightly to port.
It seems like in this movie, the ship did break in two, only it happened under water: Giant release of air at 1:09, after which the ship sank significantly faster.
@Hannodb1961 that wasnt the ship breaking in half. he paused the movie. in the real movie made in 1953 the ship rose and immediately sank. in this movie, the ship sank in one piece
It would have been a confusing night. Maybe the stern broke off while it was a mile under the ocean under all that pressure? It was a confusing night?? Fact is the stern end is quiet some way from the rest of the wreak. I think the back end broken off after she went under but if, Cameron wants to dazzle us with his version fine by me.
@EmpireLS56KW All accounts from survivors have the stern breaking off while it was still above water. Reason is was so far from the rest of the WRECK (notice correct spelling?) is it didn't have anything pulling it down so it was like in a free fall. A blunt faced object won't fall/sink in a straight line...
@Starbuckfsd Thank you for reminding me about the spelling mistyped single letter. I am dyslexic and proud to say it with my head up high. But thanks never the less for the correction I have also been interested in the “wreck” since late 70’s when I was reading barely able to read a reprinted Daily Mail newspaper and I’ve been fascinated with the “wrack” ever since.
What confuses me is wouldn't the survivors have said it broke in two? I watched one of the videos with one of the survivors telling her story on the Titanic and she said people argued with her about the ship splitting and and I was like "OMG, how can they argue with her about that? she was there and saw it, they weren't" and yeah how can people not know it split in half if the survivors said it did? Didn't they say so when they arrived in New York on the Carpathia?
@SpokaneGirl85 Only a couple of survivors reported it breaking in two, while most of the survivors never reported a breakup or reported it going down intact. Walter Lord in his book 'The Night Lives On' actually attributed the breakup reports to the funnel collapse. (that was before the discovery) I think at the time majority ruled. If the ship had really broken up, nobody watching could have missed it.
Everyone keeps askin' people why it sank in one piece...ATTENTION DUMBASSES It sank in one piece cause at the time they didn't know it split in two, THIS MOVIE WAS MADE IN 1980 THEY DISCOVERED THE SHIP BROKE IN TWO 5 YEARS LATER
@cincired241 if i would have watched the movie i would have felll for it and im pretty sure you would have to. it would have been different if clive cussler had a real titanic to use. then he would have had to wait another year. so quit complaining about how it looks. the movie was wonderful.
I realise reading your comment that you meant to say 'bow' instead of 'stern' and vice-versa. (The stern is the back fo the ship, the bow of the Titanic is the section in better shape) You bring up some very facts that would make raising the ship difficult but, not impossible. (Ie: buried 20 ft in the sea-bed) surely not THAT big an issue when modern science has sent missions to Mars! As for the wreck being a gravesite - that is true but, what a better memorial than preserving the ship itself.
in the novel " A Night To Remember" from 1955 ish it is mentioned there that the Titanic did list to the side that it was struck by the Iceberge. The Officers & Crew as well as passengers had to run to the other side of the ship to level it back up. I don't know if it was true or not but definitly something to think about. :)
This model has smoke billowing from all 4 smokestacks. The smokestack closest to the stern was just for decoration, so it wouldn't have had smoke coming out of it..
@mariomkd8203 I read that in a book where it supports what you said, but even though it was used for ventilation, do you believe it would have produced much smoke as the other three as seen in the video? I'm not saying there's anything wrong with what you're saying; I'm just asking.
@mariomkd8203 You're half right ( exscuse me for being a nerd ) but the originall titanic design included 3 funnels and 4 masts, therefore, the fourth funnel was'nt actually a "must have" feature aboard the ship, the only reason it was put there was to express the size of the liner, ( More funnels = bigger ship ) although it did fuction as ventialation, it was'nt in the originall design therefore you and "thefishtwo" are both right
@mariomkd8203 It was used for both decoration and ventilation, but the main idea was just to make the ship look more grander, they didnt plan on using it was a ventilation as much as they did with making the ship look bigger
@mariomkd8203 Though, they opted for a fourth funnel to also make the ship LOOK bigger. (They didn't want to be upstaged by the Cunard Line.) Didn't know about the ventilation bit. I cannot remember which documentary I saw that makes mention of that, but I'll see if I can find a link. I remember the Lusitania and the Mauretania were 4-funnel ships as well...the Lusitania, anyway.
@mariomkd8203 Well, it was put there for decoration and the fact it made the ship look grand. It didn't need it, but they decided to make it a ventilation shaft as well, to get aesthetic use out of it.
@mariomkd8203 Strictly speaking, however, it WAS for decoration as it did not perform the functions of a funnel. For merely ventilating the engine room they could have fitted conventional ventilators but they did not as they wanted the look of a four-stacker.
@mariomkd8203 Actually the #4 funnel was used for the uptake of exhaust from the galleys/kitchens. #3 was for turbine/reciprocating uptake, and #s 1 and 2 funnels were for exhaust from the boiler rooms.
@mariomkd8203 whatever practical purposes the aft funnels had, they were seen as a "must" for any big liner. With higher boiler pressures it was possible to get the same amount of horsepower from a smaller amount of water and so the space occupied by boilers under deck could be reduced. But this simple mathematics did not agree with popular taste which demanded a fourth funnel.
I am not even sure whether "Ballin's dicke Dampfer" with their high pressure water-tube boilers needed their third one.
@thefishtwo This is a common misconception. The fourth funnel was not connected to boiler uptakes, but it did have a chimney from the galleys and smoke room fireplace. A THIN plume of smoke was present whenever the kitchens were fired up, which would be most of the time. This chimney was about four feet in diameter in the forward half of the funnel.
@thefishtwo The Fourth smokestack was fake and it was there because they beileved if it had more smokestacks it was faster thats what the passengers thought and the people working on the ship new what it did and why it was there it was used for ventilation for the turbine and reciprocating engine room
The book on which this movie is based has the ship in 2 pieces - dislike movies not true to their inspiration or to the aurhor (Cussler). Also, the ship itself is being destroyed by bacerteria called Rusticles (there is a scientific name - nomenclature for the Titanic). And rasing it is oppossed by the families of those who died. It is a burial ground - would you want your loved ones raised? Disanterred? That is what raising this ship fr its mournful resting place would accomplish!
@optimusprine1310 me too. it's haunting, scary, & the john barry soundtrack is beautiful. the sinking scenes are the most frightening especially when the propellers are seen.
the titanic can never hit the surface, she will fall apart the second she hits air, it has been at the bottom of the altantic for almost a hundreds years, its to late for her to come up, and she shouldn't, she should stay there, its a grave for the passengers/crew that died on the titanic
Raise the Titanic needed a scene like this. Watching the movie as a child I was so upset that it just went into "office politics". The movie had potential and would've been more of a success had they done 1912 scenes. Ironic this movie came out just a few years before the actual ship was located. It would be awesome it they could raise it for real ... and preserve it in a glass tank or something
@Napp28 Or better! Restore her to her former glory and make her sail the sea of Atlantic once again. Altough it is difficult, but possible and we would need billions and where to get them from? But I hope that they can raise her in they years to come before she collapses, because we need to preserve Titanic, because she is too important to be just let to rust away.
@Napp28 its rotting its persumed that it would just break up coming up to the surface. Plus the bow part of the ship was believed to have not completly filled with water hence why in inploded on the sea bed it would be easier to lift but its wrecked and buckled at the bottom . The most preserved part of the ship is the stern because it filled with water its speed going down was like 40 knots and embedded itself 20 ft into the sea bed . Its a graveyard and should only be visited not messed with
@Napp28 A glass tank 900 feet long? LOL. I think if they tried to raise it it would just fall apart anyway. I agree the film would have had better success with some 1912 scenes,it would have tied the movie together.
@11mitty13 hahaha tittanic always had a slight port list and a anyhing that big isnt going to role over to the oposite side very easyily old warships some times listed towards one side wihle the water rushed in the other because they were stuck in a turn or already listing from being rammed (without breaching) or the way the ship was positioned in the waves big enough wave rolls it torpedo hits blows hole water rushes in along with a lotta other stuff and she sinks with a list from the wave...
@wepntech bad thing to write about a wave the facts show is was a flat surface which is very rare, and ill say it again from people who survived it, when that area of the bow was going under they said it was listing to the star board
@inugirlo38234 um i was just saying what i have learnt after over 10 years of studying it, and i do not recall any laughing and last i re posted was over 3 weeks ago
I have learned about titanic most of my life, and was in a play of it, so i had to learns how it was built and everything, btw i didn't mean it in a bad way, but u were laughing
@inugirlo38234 im only 14, so ive grown up about the titanic, and i was laughing at the movie desingers how large the list was to the other side, so even if it did sink on that angle the life boats on 1 side wouldnt have been able to be lowerd, i would never laugh at the actuall disaster for anything
wow, you are only one year younger than me, and im glad you would never laugh at the real ship :) cuz its a disater we cant ever take back, all we can do is pray for the souls of Titanic, is let them know we are thinking of them, even at our young age -smiles-
Believe or not, the follow up to Raise the Titanic (sort of) is Sahara, staring Matthew McConaughey. McConaughey takes over the role of Dirk Pitt from Richard Jordan. If you watch the being credits of Sahara carefully, you’ll see a news paper clipping pinned to the back wall of Pitt’s office, referring to the rising of Titanic.
Brilliant job… I’m really fond of this film. I’ve always thought Raise the Titanic should have an intro like this. Did you take footage from the 1979 film, S.O.S Titanic? I hear the book begins with the story of how Brewster and his men out ran the assassins, and details how Brewster ends up on the Titanic and what he does during the sinking.
hm okay so they made it look like the titanic sank right next to the iceberg... does anybody know how long it took for the titanic to stop after hitting the iceberg?
One very good detail I noticed at the beggining was the the morse lamp on the bridge trying to signal the Californian, or the so-called "mystery ship"...No idea if it was the intention of the pruducers to put that in, but if it was it shows a great deal of historical accuracy...Because the bridge crew was FRANTICALLY signaling with the morse lamp, hop[ing that the lights they could see so nearby would come to their aid...Sadly history chose another path.
From What i read there was about a 20 Minute Prolgue if you read the book then you know what happened to Bigalow the night she sank. However that show which you speak of Voyager also used some footage from the 1953 Titanic cause i clearly identify the iceburg hitting scene. Either way good job on it i liked it
@MalaFiumanka It sank in one piece in this version because it was made prior to the discovery of the wreck 1985 when it was generally assumed it sank intact.
@mariomkd8203 Why did evereyone say it sank intact? Its a 50/50 for me. Part of me says that it sank at 1 20 degree angle and split underwater not noticed, or it split underwater as it was getting plunged down.
@zombislayerpwnsnoobs I think the reason most survivors said it sunk in one piece was that it was dark. The lights had failed and it was a moonless night (that was also the reason the lookouts didn't see the iceberg until it was too late).
@banjokitten nope, actually after the box office bomb of the film, the model was abandoned in the Malta water tank studio where filming occured. It is there to this day but hardly recongnizable. You can find links online
@mariomkd8203 Ah I see. A Times supplement some years ago said it had been lost after the film - but not the model in this scene, the smaller one which was raised.
I noticed that the RTT sinking scene has an accurate mast, but the model that made it to the finished film has a three mast version (or some sort of vents alongside). I supposed they wanted to make it look stronger and believable that it survives bursting out the water. I know Ken Marshall worked on that model. I bet that decision they made bugged him.
@craiger1172001 Yes that's true. But the reason they used the vents was because they had purchased an old Greek liner to be used for the raised Titanic which had those vents. The producers, oddly enough, chose not to add them to their model instead of taking them off of the Greek liner. And yes, Ken Marschall was very upset about it.
@craiger1172001 "Bugged him"? I've read that Ken Marschall went absolutely ballistic when he found out and essentially disowned the project from that point onwards.
Yes. The final plunge is scrap footage from Fox's 1953 "Titanic". Apparently, the model did not want to go under in this take--you can see it resisting sinking, and the explosion smoke goes the opposite way.
The list to port became so pronounced at one point in the sinking that people on the boat deck were ordered to the starboard side to level her out. Lowering of the boats had become hindered as they bumped along rivet heads on the high side. This fact is often forgotten.
Hey your wright... They have just edited the RTTs sinking scene and have tooken the 1953 sinking scene. The end is the same, only in color... Now i wonder where what the real one looked like.
The footage belongs in a private collection. Music was scored for the peice and some of it was released. Check out my videos for some of the deleated score for 'Raise The Titanic'.
goodness, this movie was horrible. so much form the book was left out. these scenes would have made it much better in my opinion.
Soundwave3591 23 hours ago
scientists actually tried to raise the titanic from its watery grave, thank goodness that didn't work and they decided to leave it there, cuz the ship is like a grave stone for all those who ded
raeven1212 2 days ago
Did they make this movie before it was proved that the Titanic broke in half?
rrthiel 2 weeks ago
@rrthiel Yes, the braking in half was confirmed 5 yrs. later.
TheFakeAvatar 2 weeks ago
i noticed that this is a mix if scenes from the sinking scene that was deleated from the movie, and from a movie made in the 50's
Davis4037 1 month ago
@Davis4037 looks like it comes from a night to remember
angiedawson1969 3 weeks ago
@Davis4037 I saw the "movie made in the 50's", and I did not see anything familiar.
TheFakeAvatar 2 weeks ago
Back in the 1980s I believe 85 or 87, Doug Luellen broadcast the first discovery of the Titanic's location, since its sinking. I have it somewhere on vhs and would like to download it. Does anyone remember that broadcast?
Sarasdad91 1 month ago
WERE DID YOU GET THE FILM FROM?
janebook1 1 month ago
why is it listing to the port side
DanX10001 1 month ago
@DanX10001 This was before they found the ship, they had no idea how it sank
cadamy4 1 month ago
@cadamy4 But the people who live prob. said that it snapped
BrandonSinkovich 1 month ago
@BrandonSinkovich They did, no one believed them, they just thought "It was dark, you were scared you don't know what you saw!"
cadamy4 1 month ago
@cadamy4 there is always a great deal of theft accusation in Titanic movies. people claim "a Night to Remember" stole footage from the 1943 Nazi Propaganda film version.
Soundwave3591 23 hours ago
@DanX10001 well, during the sinking, titanic did have a slight list to port, but not this great of a list. the real list was only about 5 degrees, this has to be at least 10 in the video
Davis4037 1 month ago
why couldn't they find the real titanic first and then make the movie
Stormflux247 1 month ago
@Stormflux247 because the book was already written, and this movie was made from a book. and since the book was written before titanic was found, and the movie was filmed before titanic was found, it does not show a breakup
Davis4037 1 month ago
@Davis4037 ok
Stormflux247 1 month ago
@Stormflux247
syukursanusimalaysia 4 weeks ago
@Stormflux247 cause they cant wait
TheAwesomevideos123 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Suscribete ami canal Tee gustara (:
LaddyTatis 2 months ago
Great scenes, except the ship was not listing to port, and while some ice did fall on the forward welldeck, it wasn't a mountain of it like seen here.
prudenceislandboy 2 months ago
@prudenceislandboy it is said from survivors, and some scientists have done tests to see, and apparently, the Titanic did in fact list to port. Certainly not at the extreme angle shown here, it would only have been a 2 or 3 degree list, but apparently there's evidence it did list slightly to port.
OnyxBlackEclipse 2 months ago
So what first the Titanic breaks in half now it doesnt?
jazz265 2 months ago
@jazz265 this movie was from the 1950s. the belief until 1985 was that the ship sank in one piece
thweepz 2 months ago
@thweepz dude this is from like two years before they found the actual wreck
Jakanddaxter1999 1 month ago
@Jakanddaxter1999 you kidding this is like 30 years before they found it
jazz265 1 month ago
@jazz265 i think these movies are opinions of it splitting or not.
MrMariomario1980 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jazz265 i think these movies are opinions of it splitting or not.
MrMariomario1980 1 month ago
The movie was very poor.but the John Barry's score is very impressive.
It reminds me a good James Bond movie from the sixties/seventies !
P.S : if my english is bad, would you please excuse me ! I'm from Belgium...
knight30002008 2 months ago
This wasn't a deleted scene this was just took from the earlier version of the titanic film I n like 1953 or somthin
ERJslbc 3 months ago
FAKE
sixflags441 3 months ago
@sixflags441 How?
WatchdogDisciple 2 months ago
It seems like in this movie, the ship did break in two, only it happened under water: Giant release of air at 1:09, after which the ship sank significantly faster.
Hannodb1961 3 months ago
@Hannodb1961 that wasnt the ship breaking in half. he paused the movie. in the real movie made in 1953 the ship rose and immediately sank. in this movie, the ship sank in one piece
thweepz 2 months ago
I've just thought "It's amazing how this music reminds me of Black Hole (1979). Now I found out it's the same composer... never mind...
...wait.... so was there any point to write about this?
Virtimera 4 months ago
@Virtimera I thought that lol.....really? Same composer? That explains it :-)
R1CH130 3 months ago
@R1CH130 Yes. John Barry.
Virtimera 3 months ago
It would have been a confusing night. Maybe the stern broke off while it was a mile under the ocean under all that pressure? It was a confusing night?? Fact is the stern end is quiet some way from the rest of the wreak. I think the back end broken off after she went under but if, Cameron wants to dazzle us with his version fine by me.
EmpireLS56KW 4 months ago
@EmpireLS56KW All accounts from survivors have the stern breaking off while it was still above water. Reason is was so far from the rest of the WRECK (notice correct spelling?) is it didn't have anything pulling it down so it was like in a free fall. A blunt faced object won't fall/sink in a straight line...
Starbuckfsd 4 months ago
@Starbuckfsd Thank you for reminding me about the spelling mistyped single letter. I am dyslexic and proud to say it with my head up high. But thanks never the less for the correction I have also been interested in the “wreck” since late 70’s when I was reading barely able to read a reprinted Daily Mail newspaper and I’ve been fascinated with the “wrack” ever since.
EmpireLS56KW 4 months ago
Aww <3 RIP Titanic and all killed peoples! <3
Mollykia 4 months ago
April 15 2012 = 100 years after Titanic Sank
Stormrider019 4 months ago
neither was it listing
Firemarioflower 4 months ago
this is wrong man. the bow didnt go that deep right after the collision.
Firemarioflower 4 months ago
All these images are not the missing footages, osme are from the 1953 Titanic movie.
TheRMSAndre1 5 months ago
What confuses me is wouldn't the survivors have said it broke in two? I watched one of the videos with one of the survivors telling her story on the Titanic and she said people argued with her about the ship splitting and and I was like "OMG, how can they argue with her about that? she was there and saw it, they weren't" and yeah how can people not know it split in half if the survivors said it did? Didn't they say so when they arrived in New York on the Carpathia?
SpokaneGirl85 6 months ago
@SpokaneGirl85 Only a couple of survivors reported it breaking in two, while most of the survivors never reported a breakup or reported it going down intact. Walter Lord in his book 'The Night Lives On' actually attributed the breakup reports to the funnel collapse. (that was before the discovery) I think at the time majority ruled. If the ship had really broken up, nobody watching could have missed it.
craiger1172001 5 months ago
When the smokestack fell @ 1:00 i almost broke down in tears.
93100rc 6 months ago
Everyone keeps askin' people why it sank in one piece...ATTENTION DUMBASSES It sank in one piece cause at the time they didn't know it split in two, THIS MOVIE WAS MADE IN 1980 THEY DISCOVERED THE SHIP BROKE IN TWO 5 YEARS LATER
93100rc 6 months ago
I wonder why people do not read the messages! Same questions!
Congratulations, your video is great!
From Brazil.
kleberg1940 6 months ago
No realist...
MrTitanicPRO 6 months ago
if u tries to raise it then it would crumble till its gone duhh
jayo100 6 months ago
steam ships only needed 3 smokestacks the 2nd one i think if i read it right was decor righ?
asukafan133 6 months ago
this looks soooooooooooooo fake
cincired241 7 months ago
@cincired241 if i would have watched the movie i would have felll for it and im pretty sure you would have to. it would have been different if clive cussler had a real titanic to use. then he would have had to wait another year. so quit complaining about how it looks. the movie was wonderful.
numadiver1998 7 months ago
fail it dident split its a failed video
nathanfishing3000 7 months ago
I think the non functional funnel was also used to hold luggage to wasnt it? Check out my videos
SuperTerminatrix 8 months ago
is this not scenes from A NIGHT TO REMEMBER?? if so classic film there was another one i think it was called ATLANTIC
JDC1985WWE 10 months ago
1:12 that scene is from A day to remember, a titanic movie!!!
TheAtmosphirguy 10 months ago
This music is so haunting. It's almost like music played for the dead.
SuperTitanicfreak 10 months ago
I saw Raise The Titanic. Great movie.
SuperTitanicfreak 10 months ago
I realise reading your comment that you meant to say 'bow' instead of 'stern' and vice-versa. (The stern is the back fo the ship, the bow of the Titanic is the section in better shape) You bring up some very facts that would make raising the ship difficult but, not impossible. (Ie: buried 20 ft in the sea-bed) surely not THAT big an issue when modern science has sent missions to Mars! As for the wreck being a gravesite - that is true but, what a better memorial than preserving the ship itself.
Napp28 1 year ago
in the novel " A Night To Remember" from 1955 ish it is mentioned there that the Titanic did list to the side that it was struck by the Iceberge. The Officers & Crew as well as passengers had to run to the other side of the ship to level it back up. I don't know if it was true or not but definitly something to think about. :)
stubsfahey87 1 year ago
BS to the person who made the deleted scenes, IT SPLIT IN 2 !!!
Goldfirebird18 1 year ago
This model has smoke billowing from all 4 smokestacks. The smokestack closest to the stern was just for decoration, so it wouldn't have had smoke coming out of it..
Because I'm a nerd like that.
thefishtwo 1 year ago 34
@thefishtwo Actually it wasn't for decoration. it was used for ventilation for the turbine and reciprocating engine room
mariomkd8203 1 year ago 33
@mariomkd8203 I read that in a book where it supports what you said, but even though it was used for ventilation, do you believe it would have produced much smoke as the other three as seen in the video? I'm not saying there's anything wrong with what you're saying; I'm just asking.
germanname1990 1 year ago
@mariomkd8203 It was also used for the storage of pets, not all of course.
CHRISTINKER86 11 months ago
@mariomkd8203 You're half right ( exscuse me for being a nerd ) but the originall titanic design included 3 funnels and 4 masts, therefore, the fourth funnel was'nt actually a "must have" feature aboard the ship, the only reason it was put there was to express the size of the liner, ( More funnels = bigger ship ) although it did fuction as ventialation, it was'nt in the originall design therefore you and "thefishtwo" are both right
Timberwolf8998 9 months ago
@mariomkd8203 It was used for both decoration and ventilation, but the main idea was just to make the ship look more grander, they didnt plan on using it was a ventilation as much as they did with making the ship look bigger
TheRealAdfirmatio 8 months ago
@mariomkd8203 Though, they opted for a fourth funnel to also make the ship LOOK bigger. (They didn't want to be upstaged by the Cunard Line.) Didn't know about the ventilation bit. I cannot remember which documentary I saw that makes mention of that, but I'll see if I can find a link. I remember the Lusitania and the Mauretania were 4-funnel ships as well...the Lusitania, anyway.
Bonemeal2 6 months ago
@mariomkd8203 Well, it was put there for decoration and the fact it made the ship look grand. It didn't need it, but they decided to make it a ventilation shaft as well, to get aesthetic use out of it.
DempseyBloom 5 months ago
@mariomkd8203 ACTULY the back one was fake
ghostjoker101 5 months ago
@mariomkd8203 Strictly speaking, however, it WAS for decoration as it did not perform the functions of a funnel. For merely ventilating the engine room they could have fitted conventional ventilators but they did not as they wanted the look of a four-stacker.
McToddRidesAgain 4 months ago
@mariomkd8203 i thoght it was a dummy funel u can walk out of
orangebro22 4 months ago
@mariomkd8203 Didn't it also vent smoke from the kitchen?
CarGuyZM10 3 months ago
@mariomkd8203 Actually the #4 funnel was used for the uptake of exhaust from the galleys/kitchens. #3 was for turbine/reciprocating uptake, and #s 1 and 2 funnels were for exhaust from the boiler rooms.
galoon 3 months ago
@mariomkd8203 whatever practical purposes the aft funnels had, they were seen as a "must" for any big liner. With higher boiler pressures it was possible to get the same amount of horsepower from a smaller amount of water and so the space occupied by boilers under deck could be reduced. But this simple mathematics did not agree with popular taste which demanded a fourth funnel.
I am not even sure whether "Ballin's dicke Dampfer" with their high pressure water-tube boilers needed their third one.
Jeansschwimmer 3 months ago
@mariomkd8203 no it was fake, white star didnt want a ship with less smokestacks than any other ships around at that time....
jackxclarke 1 month ago
@thefishtwo It was partly used for decoration and for ventilation.
TripperTrail 1 year ago
@thefishtwo Actually the last stack had some smoke only because it was hooked up to the kitchens for exhaust. Other then that ur right.
fischerjohn72 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thefishtwo This is a common misconception. The fourth funnel was not connected to boiler uptakes, but it did have a chimney from the galleys and smoke room fireplace. A THIN plume of smoke was present whenever the kitchens were fired up, which would be most of the time. This chimney was about four feet in diameter in the forward half of the funnel.
DCnightcrawler 7 months ago
Respond to this video... Some of these shots are discards from the 1953 film "Titanic".
DCnightcrawler 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thefishtwo The Fourth smokestack was fake and it was there because they beileved if it had more smokestacks it was faster thats what the passengers thought and the people working on the ship new what it did and why it was there it was used for ventilation for the turbine and reciprocating engine room
lilheroslegacy 3 months ago
@thefishtwo there 3 smokestacks and the fourth one is the Steam one.
DeWina512 2 months ago
Not even god himself could save this movie
officialpickle 1 year ago
The book on which this movie is based has the ship in 2 pieces - dislike movies not true to their inspiration or to the aurhor (Cussler). Also, the ship itself is being destroyed by bacerteria called Rusticles (there is a scientific name - nomenclature for the Titanic). And rasing it is oppossed by the families of those who died. It is a burial ground - would you want your loved ones raised? Disanterred? That is what raising this ship fr its mournful resting place would accomplish!
CyberErin 1 year ago
did it really lean to the side that much?
SUPERWSXQAZ 1 year ago
@SUPERWSXQAZ
wat do u mean?
inugirlo38234 1 year ago
this song really creeps me out
optimusprine1310 1 year ago
@optimusprine1310 me too. it's haunting, scary, & the john barry soundtrack is beautiful. the sinking scenes are the most frightening especially when the propellers are seen.
d4seasons 1 year ago
@d4seasons you sure got that right !
optimusprine1310 4 months ago
the titanic can never hit the surface, she will fall apart the second she hits air, it has been at the bottom of the altantic for almost a hundreds years, its to late for her to come up, and she shouldn't, she should stay there, its a grave for the passengers/crew that died on the titanic
inugirlo38234 1 year ago
Is this clip frome the old titinic film Atlantis?
VwErik88 1 year ago
Raise the Titanic needed a scene like this. Watching the movie as a child I was so upset that it just went into "office politics". The movie had potential and would've been more of a success had they done 1912 scenes. Ironic this movie came out just a few years before the actual ship was located. It would be awesome it they could raise it for real ... and preserve it in a glass tank or something
Napp28 1 year ago 5
@Napp28 Or better! Restore her to her former glory and make her sail the sea of Atlantic once again. Altough it is difficult, but possible and we would need billions and where to get them from? But I hope that they can raise her in they years to come before she collapses, because we need to preserve Titanic, because she is too important to be just let to rust away.
ARSA525 1 year ago
@Napp28 ...your going to need a REALLY big glass tank
ColumbiaAndHoodRiver 1 year ago
@Napp28 its rotting its persumed that it would just break up coming up to the surface. Plus the bow part of the ship was believed to have not completly filled with water hence why in inploded on the sea bed it would be easier to lift but its wrecked and buckled at the bottom . The most preserved part of the ship is the stern because it filled with water its speed going down was like 40 knots and embedded itself 20 ft into the sea bed . Its a graveyard and should only be visited not messed with
antsthlondon 1 year ago
@Napp28 A glass tank 900 feet long? LOL. I think if they tried to raise it it would just fall apart anyway. I agree the film would have had better success with some 1912 scenes,it would have tied the movie together.
blaster2012 10 months ago
hahaha the ship was hit on the starboard side and its listing to the port and theres ice on the starboard side when its sinking...massive fail
11mitty13 1 year ago
@11mitty13 The titanic did list to port when it sank due to the fact the ship was off balance (titanic always had a slight list to port)
raymondleeleggs 1 year ago
@raymondleeleggs but they have had proven when the bow was sinking it listed to the starboard
11mitty13 1 year ago
@raymondleeleggs and i mean when the bow was fully going under not the lower part
11mitty13 1 year ago
@11mitty13 hahaha tittanic always had a slight port list and a anyhing that big isnt going to role over to the oposite side very easyily old warships some times listed towards one side wihle the water rushed in the other because they were stuck in a turn or already listing from being rammed (without breaching) or the way the ship was positioned in the waves big enough wave rolls it torpedo hits blows hole water rushes in along with a lotta other stuff and she sinks with a list from the wave...
wepntech 1 year ago
@wepntech bad thing to write about a wave the facts show is was a flat surface which is very rare, and ill say it again from people who survived it, when that area of the bow was going under they said it was listing to the star board
11mitty13 1 year ago
@11mitty13
you know its not funny right, she sank because the hull on the starboard side wasn't built stong enough to handle that kind of pressure
inugirlo38234 1 year ago
@inugirlo38234 um i was just saying what i have learnt after over 10 years of studying it, and i do not recall any laughing and last i re posted was over 3 weeks ago
11mitty13 1 year ago
@11mitty13
I have learned about titanic most of my life, and was in a play of it, so i had to learns how it was built and everything, btw i didn't mean it in a bad way, but u were laughing
inugirlo38234 1 year ago
@inugirlo38234 im only 14, so ive grown up about the titanic, and i was laughing at the movie desingers how large the list was to the other side, so even if it did sink on that angle the life boats on 1 side wouldnt have been able to be lowerd, i would never laugh at the actuall disaster for anything
11mitty13 1 year ago
@11mitty13
wow, you are only one year younger than me, and im glad you would never laugh at the real ship :) cuz its a disater we cant ever take back, all we can do is pray for the souls of Titanic, is let them know we are thinking of them, even at our young age -smiles-
inugirlo38234 1 year ago
this song creeps me out
optimusprine1310 1 year ago
OHH so thast why the 2nd funnel is missing ok got it :)
eyesk8ter 1 year ago
Believe or not, the follow up to Raise the Titanic (sort of) is Sahara, staring Matthew McConaughey. McConaughey takes over the role of Dirk Pitt from Richard Jordan. If you watch the being credits of Sahara carefully, you’ll see a news paper clipping pinned to the back wall of Pitt’s office, referring to the rising of Titanic.
MultiNexusOne 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiNexusOne 1 year ago
Brilliant job… I’m really fond of this film. I’ve always thought Raise the Titanic should have an intro like this. Did you take footage from the 1979 film, S.O.S Titanic? I hear the book begins with the story of how Brewster and his men out ran the assassins, and details how Brewster ends up on the Titanic and what he does during the sinking.
MultiNexusOne 1 year ago
Comment removed
MultiNexusOne 1 year ago
I remember this movie...it sank quicker than the real ship at the box office!!!
ZenPimps 1 year ago
hm okay so they made it look like the titanic sank right next to the iceberg... does anybody know how long it took for the titanic to stop after hitting the iceberg?
rgur90x 1 year ago
about 1:10, looks like it came from titanic 1953
Davis4037 1 year ago
One very good detail I noticed at the beggining was the the morse lamp on the bridge trying to signal the Californian, or the so-called "mystery ship"...No idea if it was the intention of the pruducers to put that in, but if it was it shows a great deal of historical accuracy...Because the bridge crew was FRANTICALLY signaling with the morse lamp, hop[ing that the lights they could see so nearby would come to their aid...Sadly history chose another path.
prudenceislandboy 1 year ago
Very fascinating Concept.
TitanicMatthew 1 year ago
From What i read there was about a 20 Minute Prolgue if you read the book then you know what happened to Bigalow the night she sank. However that show which you speak of Voyager also used some footage from the 1953 Titanic cause i clearly identify the iceburg hitting scene. Either way good job on it i liked it
Rocky54167 1 year ago
Why did it sink in one piece?
MalaFiumanka 1 year ago
@MalaFiumanka It sank in one piece in this version because it was made prior to the discovery of the wreck 1985 when it was generally assumed it sank intact.
mariomkd8203 1 year ago 14
@mariomkd8203 Why did evereyone say it sank intact? Its a 50/50 for me. Part of me says that it sank at 1 20 degree angle and split underwater not noticed, or it split underwater as it was getting plunged down.
zombislayerpwnsnoobs 5 months ago
@zombislayerpwnsnoobs I think the reason most survivors said it sunk in one piece was that it was dark. The lights had failed and it was a moonless night (that was also the reason the lookouts didn't see the iceberg until it was too late).
janeyrevanescence12 4 months ago
I read somewhere that the model was lost at the end of the production and never found?
banjokitten 1 year ago
@banjokitten nope, actually after the box office bomb of the film, the model was abandoned in the Malta water tank studio where filming occured. It is there to this day but hardly recongnizable. You can find links online
mariomkd8203 1 year ago
@mariomkd8203 Ah I see. A Times supplement some years ago said it had been lost after the film - but not the model in this scene, the smaller one which was raised.
banjokitten 1 year ago
@mariomkd8203 and the modelk is rusting
davvvvo 1 year ago
I noticed that the RTT sinking scene has an accurate mast, but the model that made it to the finished film has a three mast version (or some sort of vents alongside). I supposed they wanted to make it look stronger and believable that it survives bursting out the water. I know Ken Marshall worked on that model. I bet that decision they made bugged him.
craiger1172001 1 year ago
@craiger1172001 Yes that's true. But the reason they used the vents was because they had purchased an old Greek liner to be used for the raised Titanic which had those vents. The producers, oddly enough, chose not to add them to their model instead of taking them off of the Greek liner. And yes, Ken Marschall was very upset about it.
mariomkd8203 1 year ago
@craiger1172001 "Bugged him"? I've read that Ken Marschall went absolutely ballistic when he found out and essentially disowned the project from that point onwards.
turricaned 1 year ago
i have a fear of the titanic and ocean water, this video almost made me scream
HALFdrunkJH 1 year ago
acctualy there some part of this video that was tokked from a night to remember a 1950's american movie
soulblaser 1 year ago
@soulblaser no those bits you are talking about came from 20th Century Foxs 1953 Movie Titanic
DanielHami23 1 year ago
Yes. The final plunge is scrap footage from Fox's 1953 "Titanic". Apparently, the model did not want to go under in this take--you can see it resisting sinking, and the explosion smoke goes the opposite way.
dallaskeffer 1 year ago
amazing !
rsousas14 2 years ago
The ship wasnt leaning to the side like that, or it was but only ever so slightly.
but this was made before it was discovered
Andrewmcmelonse 2 years ago
i think it was something like a 4 degree tilt on the port side. nothing like in the movie
mariomkd8203 2 years ago
The list to port became so pronounced at one point in the sinking that people on the boat deck were ordered to the starboard side to level her out. Lowering of the boats had become hindered as they bumped along rivet heads on the high side. This fact is often forgotten.
dallaskeffer 1 year ago
the final part where we see the ship go under is actually from the 1950's movie 'Titanic'
showboyninner 2 years ago
yea i know. there were no scenes i could find from RTT with the Titanic actually sinking
mariomkd8203 2 years ago
No, you r wrong about that. Thats the same 55ft model that you see in the other clips in this video.
TheRMSAndre1 2 years ago
No it's a fact, the person who posted this video has even said so. If u need proof, watch the film Titanic(1953) and see for yourself!
showboyninner 2 years ago
Hey your wright... They have just edited the RTTs sinking scene and have tooken the 1953 sinking scene. The end is the same, only in color... Now i wonder where what the real one looked like.
TheRMSAndre1 2 years ago
Though it we never may know as it was supposed to been 12 full minutes. There may not have been any music either.
Has the full footage ever been found, or is it under private collection?
silenceofthehills 2 years ago
It is under a private collection. The footage I showed is to my knowledge all that has been released.
mariomkd8203 2 years ago
The footage belongs in a private collection. Music was scored for the peice and some of it was released. Check out my videos for some of the deleated score for 'Raise The Titanic'.
RaiseTheTitanic1980 2 years ago
This movie supports the one peace sinking theory though today the break up is confirmed
Jenema2 2 years ago
Yea well keep in mind this movie was made before the actual wreck was discovered and the one piece theory was the accepted theory then
mariomkd8203 2 years ago