11:45am 911; KTLa 5 from Los Angeles Replay

[chrisj123100]

The more of these videos i see the more ridiculous they get. Really, angles, distance, the type of camera, and especially, optical illusions mean anything to you? This doesn't prove a plane hit WTC 1 twice or never. It was hitting WTC 2. To say that this person's uncle isn't a witness since she won't provide his private info to a stranger is absurd. There were tons of witnesses more than was interviewed. But they are all actors or working for the gov't right? You have no solid evidence.

[CNN911Fakes]

@chrisj123100 You are welcome to prsent a video that demonstrates what you speak of. I have never found one and, if you review the comments, no one has ever offered one here

Fact is, the video is a fake. We have no direct evidence of what occured in the air around the wtc on 9/11.

[jpayne4494]

You already posted this video under a different title. You can't just change the title in hopes people will like it better.

[gladheateher4now]

I think you better  UP,,,,your medication !

[remondo]

CNN911Fakes it's people like you that disrepute all other videos trying to change peoples views on this matter. I don't ever believe what the media tells me and neither should anybody else, find your own real proof and come up with your own conclusions if it really matters to you that much. It's obvious governments are corrupt but they need us more than we need them. Oh and btw, you need to read about pixel blend and artifacts, these videos prove nothing. 

[9111tube]

That "line" or black lining there is the edge of the other tower behind it. It disappeared in the space because it was slamming into that tower. You can see it is the angle of the front tower that is showing the edge of the tower behind it. Again that "line" is the edge of the tower in back so of course it disappeared when the plane hit it you fool. You have people thinking the black trimmed line is the front tower on the video. Jesus people are stupid...The front building is on an angle. Duhhhh

[trj23100]

i love neo cons

[elrugged1]

It is ironic that everyone is so confident what happened that day, when it is clear that only the perpetrators know EXACTLY what happened and how THEY did it. We are all just guessing. The only thing that is definite is that the government helped pull this off and we were all decieved, but we still dont know EXACTLY what went down. None of us should sound so sure of ourselves when it comes to 911

[weinmanjoe]

the creator of this post is dumber than dirt

[trueleroix]

The funny thing is that the people that put forth these conspiracies call themselves "truthers".

[zenoist2]

It shows the totally impossible 530mph as being about right.

530mph is 26ft per 1/30sec

530 x5280/3600= 777.333 ft per sec/30= 25.9.

Needless to say  its impossible for the said plane to fly this fast at that altitude because the air is a lot thicker at sea level than at cruising height and the engines just cant push the volume of air through.

[777lovewillconquer]

fact 1-"no planes" is a gov't sponsored disinfo program.

fact 2-no planes hit the building.

it is clear holographic technology was used on 9/11.this was done for numerous reasons and is quite obvious if you do a thorough review of the videos of flight 175.disinfo is often based on "real" facts of the story. just those that are so incredible to speak of them is to discredit yourself as I have done here most likely.peace

[goleafsoke]

how the hell could there be hollagrams on 9/11

fact 1- the people on the planes and the people in the biuldings ask them if there were hollagrams

fact 2- how would they project the hollagrams? answer that and still say the government did it

[nordbergsongs]

@777lovewillconquer I agree with your skepticism, but there were planes. Watched it with my own eyes, the cut out shape in the buildings existed too in the shape of the plane. I still believe it was a controlled demolition, but I've yet to see any evidence to make me think differently about the planes.

[josesince82]

Look up the word "stupid" on the dictionary and you'll find the face of the moron who created this video

[Youtubax]

Okey the only fact here (and everyone here must agree) is that the guy who created these videos should get pysichiatric treatment asap. Period.

[lollipop266]

dude you are soo stupid. you think the whole thing was fake? you shouldn't even be an american. go to iran or something.

[myster1234]

let me tell you what I saw. It was earlier than 8:45 but I recall waking up seeing KTLA showing a feed from NY of possibly one of the towers on fire. I thought it was something else, like maybe somebody threatening to jump or gas-leak evac, etc. and was startled when I saw what appeared to be a small white plane strike the building. The view was from the air, and directly behind it. I recall hearing the anchors saying the reports said it was possibly remote control planes.

[myster1234]

Since I saw what appeared to me to be a small Cessna-type plane, I figured. OK. But then I heard later on they were saying they got word these were in fact possibly jetliners. I was like "WTF?" because what I saw looked so small. There is alot of footage of jetliners hitting the towers, we know people on the Flight#s are not around.

But can someone please find the KTLA footage from the point they broke the story, I would love to verify my recollection.

[bjm351]

FACT- two remote controlled planes with bombs on board hit wtc. FACT- no planes hit pentagon or pennsylvania paddock. FACT- the U.S Gov orchastrated the whole thing. FACT- controlled demolition bring down wtc 12 & 7. FACT- The new Freedom tower is fuckn GAY!! i will never visit a building that already looks like its been attacked!!!

[CNN911Fakes]

bjm351,

I challenge all who claim any kind of plane hit the towers to provide any kind of proof.

If you ever find proof, please then explain why faked videos, planted airplane parts and actors were needed.

Oh, I have standards of decency on my boards; please avoid the use of vulgarity, profanity and, of course, don't troll or spam.

[measlydegree]

Why won't you just answer my question all I asked was what your video meant and you won't answer. Now whether you want to believe me or not about my uncle is fine, but I'm not going to get on youtube and lie about a family member being a witness to 911. Plus, I'm not about to give out information about my uncle to a complete stranger. If anyone else is reading this comment, sense CNN911Fakes can't answer a question about his/her own video then maybe you all out there can.

[CNN911Fakes]

measlydegree

The video doesn't mean anything.

The video shows that the plane we saw on TV went on this side of wtc1.

Your uncle is not a witness then, is he?

As I said, I will match witnesses. I can give names, time recorded, etc.

If you can't, then you don't have any witnesses, you have rumours.

[measlydegree]

So, correct me if I'm wrong, but this video is trying to state that no plane at all hit the building. Correct.

[CNN911Fakes]

measlydegree

Not at all.

[measlydegree]

ok :)

[measlydegree]

i just dont get wat u r trying to say. did the plane not crash into the building cause if thats wat your sayin then i know its a lie cause my uncle was only a block away when the first plane hit. and yes he saw.

[CNN911Fakes]

measlydegree

Tell us exactly where your uncle was, the time and what was he dong there.

[measlydegree]

I asked a question first so if you answer it then it might make it easier to state my case. I asked what your video was trying to say because I didn't fully understand it.

[CNN911Fakes]

measlydegree

Yup, you did. A question not within the domain of the video and thus I can't answer it.

But, you made an assertion of fact and I want to see if your informtaion is bogus or not.

Tell us about your uncle.

[Seanqw3]

another ignorant person who thinks they're smarter than everyone else. the mental frame that must surround your clouded mind is probably pretty solid by now. i'll warn everyone not to waste their time arguing with this guy a pointless cause. the only result of me watching this video was some mild laughter.

[CNN911Fakes]

seanqw3

Thanks for visiting. It must be strange leaving your usual haunts as illustrated on your channel!

I guess the reason your comment is empty is because you have done no research. That is a common problem.

[lqcrow]

lol. It's funny when people proudly declare their total detatchment from reality. Bonus points as well for making nonsensical comments and arbitrary deletions when people point out the obvious fact that there were hundreds of thousands of witnesses. I pity you.

[CNN911Fakes]

lqcrow says that deleting for vulgarity, profanity, trolling and spam is arbitrary. Perhaps he has been reading 1984?

In any event, lqcrow has raised one of my favortie issues - witnesses.

Please present your best witness; name, when his/her statement was taken, location of witnessing and location of recording, time of each.

[CNN911Fakes]

lqcrow

Are you declining my invitation to witness poker?

[mets72692]

Gimme an R, Gimme an E, Gimme a T, Gimme an A, Gimme an R, Gimme a D, Gimme an E, Gimme a D! What's that spell? RETARDED! Webster's Dictionary: Retarded- adjective- what everyone who believes in the 9/11 conspiracy movement is

[CNN911Fakes]

mets72692

Thanks for the thoughtful and well enunciated analysis that I am sure helps viewers see the multiple errors in this video.

Oh, wait!

Your comment was just mindless noise!

[Marckymarc71]

Um, care to explain the dozens of other videos from other angles and thousands of eyewitnesses that prove you wrong? :/

[CNN911Fakes]

marckymarc71 Your comment is confusing.

This video deals exclusively with the ktla5 earlier capture of UA175 hitting WTC1.

Are you suggesting there are thousands of eyewitnesses to this video that can't see it crosses the line into wtc1?

[CNN911Fakes]

And, how could there be any other angle than this angle for this video?

This video, as proven completely in the video, shows that UA175 hit the South West corner of WTC1 on its final descent. Who knows about other videos?

[tvlondon]

Are you trying to tell us that this never happened? I'm confused.

[CNN911Fakes]

tvlondon,

No, I am telling you that this video of the event shows something that couldn't have happened and is, thus, fake.

What really happened? I am sure that whatever the liar bush says is a lie.

Sort of a good jumping off point, don't you think?

[chilled99]

are you saying the plane collides with the corner of the building or are you highlighting where the building and the plane visually meet?

Its a leap of faith to argue one tower was hit twice - surely other video clips will support this notion, let us know where they are.

The point of video is to illustrate words, but you're not making it clear. Get in touch with a pro video editor and they'll help you explain things on that side.

Anything less and you're hurting your own credibility.

[CNN911Fakes]

The video shows a plane hitting wtc1 when the presenter of that very video claims it is a video of a plane passing behind wtc1.

It expresses it well enough for you to have figured it out.

I have about 8 videos showing the same thing - is that what you meant?

[chilled99]

So you're saying 2 planes hit 1 building?

[CNN911Fakes]

Perhaps you should watch the video and read the sidebar.

[nigerianguy]

Rubbish, what point are you trying to make?

Logic logic logic???? do you have any?

Make some critical judgements please!

[CNN911Fakes]

Try not spamming my videos. State your case, then prove it.

[bdhardwick]

You are a complete idiot. The line between buildings seems marred by either smoke or poor video quality.

[CNN911Fakes]

I will be deleting your comment because of the ad hominem attack.

If you would like to repost without the attack, pls do.

[CNN911Fakes]

Forgot to delete your empty comment.

How about some empty comments over here

watch?v=RgTVchBl13o

[youzurk]

1 comment... where are the others?

maybe they are discussing about too fast fireman's foot in Naudet film

or they are making fun of Genghis...

sorry... I'm perplexed

[youzurk]

yes my friend!