Ok understood, but is there any theory in physics that explains why the bing bang happened? i.e Why that infinetely small and dense ''Thing'' appeared?
@BlueDemeter M theory claims to have an explanation using higher dimensional membrane collisions. All that standard physics can say is that, once you have that singularity, the nonexistence of time in a singularity (even stupendously unlikely events happen "instantaneously" if time does not pass) combined with the requirement that entropy increase (a singularity is maximal entropy for its volume, so the only way to increase entropy is to expand) makes its expansion inevitable.
I cant tell if I fell asleep half-way through and that's why I don't understand, or if it's just above my head. I'm going with the latter- and a ice-pack for my damaged brain.
@gwendance that's not part of the standard model. dark energy, dark matter, antimatter, asymmetry, super symmetry, extra dimensions, quantum gravity, wormholes, micro black holes, etc. are all separate topics.
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Unuverse let it dilate entirely
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
The unified law of Newton will throw at rubbish Einstein’s relativity, with Big bang, black holes, singularity and holes of worm. With these methaphysical theories and animation about absorption the Eartn or Sun it destroy logical thinking and reason at man. With this dissiness enter man in terrestrial life, and no more believe that he has a future. Result thus blocking of the society, which lead at general corruption of society and at her sodominess and dissoluteness.
The UNIFIED LAW is the LAW of the UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION FORCES= of the GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION FORCES = of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FORCES produced by the inner movement of the inertial rotation of the ethereal matter from bodies and substances. This, because, the ethereal particles are in continuous movement through the them nature, being electrical – produce electrical energy, being named and electrogenic particles.
Isaac Newton establishes the basic notion of classical mechanics, proved the universal attraction law and put base of the celestial mechanics. Newton had affirmed THAT IT HASN’T EXIST NATURAL PROCESS WHO HASN’T PRODUCED BY ATTRACTION AND REPULSION ACTIVE FORCES WHICH REGULATES THE CELESTIAL BODIES MOVEMENT AND THE BODIES FALING DOWN,THAT LEEDS THE CHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL PROCESSES,fact which makes that the universal attraction law acts as in macrocosmos and as in microcosmos.
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
• But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein. Dark energy is the ethereal energy and this can be harness it!
• In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
@Idol2011no because it's hard to explain university-level physics in a youtube video. Look up Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (in relation to energy and time) if you wanna know more
@Smartboy7, both "because" and "since" are terms that offer an explaination that is either obvious or where a reasonable explaination follows. "the energy used to create them can only exist for a very brief instance" is no explaination, but a loose claim. When not understanding why something can come from nothingness, you obviously don't know for a fact that it can't be in existence for only a short time. A reasonable human being should not state such inconsistent rant.
You made a mistake in the beginning of the video. the *entire* universe didn't expand from a single point. Only the visible universe expanded from a near single point. the infinite density would have reached out infinitely as well. it just expanded INTO that infinity after the big bang.
I honestly have so much respect for scientists and people who understand some of the wonders of the universe. I love the universe and i'd give anything to be able to understand the mathematical equations, the terminology, EVERYTHING! i love science! <3
i love science too, i had a D in physics only to discover years later that i love physics and i study in my free time the standard model, quantum physics etc although doing all the math really isn't my thing, but having some understanding of it is pretty cool_ if you invest some time in it you will understand all the terminology
@gromtkn sorry its late and i gave u a rather vague and "rude" answer to your question of why we can't talk about a time being smaller than 10^-43 seconds. this is a Planck Time, which is the time it takes for light, the fastest thing in existance, to travel one Planck Length. a time ANY slower than 10^-43 seconds is indistinguishable because it's impossible to to measure any change in anything, even a photon of light hasn't moved when measured in less than 10^-43
@canadarockish you say "billion light YEARS!" in the misunderstanding of a light year being a unit of time, it is a unit of distance related to time. if you wanted to you could call a meter a Light 10^-34 second (made up number for light traveling a meter) so yes the universe could have and did expand to the size of billions of light years in just 1 second. if you want just say quintillion to the quintillion meters wide in just 1 second (also made up off the top of my head)
@gromtkn thats like asking why there isn't anyting lower than absolute zero, why is -273 C absolute zero? why not -274C ? because we invented the idea of time or temperature in a mathematical sense and therefore quantized it. so there is a point where it can't get any smaller.
You obviously know your shit, but I'm confused on a couple things... 1.) Electromagnetism is a force derived from electrically charged particles interacting somehow, and strong force is the force that keeps these electrically charged particles in check with one another, correct? 2.) Is the photon (gauge boson) the same photon as one emitted by a shift in energy level (via electron), if so doesn't that mean that it can't arise from nothing (AKA virtual particle)??
the outer is the source not theinner just trust me. factor that in for everything and it all makes sense. think about it. think the universe like a hologram a human would look out and be blinded by the outer wall and the sun would help light things around us my girl is deaf and if i stand in front of the sun shhe cant see my lips so think the original light source as the darkness of space we need stars to see around us like a hologram we are blinded by the spotlight that created us
So electrically charged particles constantly emit photons. What's their wavelength? And how is it possible that they emit like really many of these all the time, but for example when an electron and a positron are annihilated, there will be only two gamma ray photons?
If a neg and a pos particles exchange photons, why can't two positives as well? What's the difference between electron and positron? What exactly makes one negative and the other positive?
@Mostwantedo These are VIRTUAL particles. They have all possible wavelengths, and they disappear before they violate the uncertainty principle restrictions. Two positive particles DO exchange virtual photons -- this results in the repulsive force that they "feel".
@Mostwantedo 1) why 2 gamma ray fotons. well you probably know E=mc² now, if i tell you that a positron = -electron then the masses are identical, so the energie is the same, now if they anihilate you get 2mc², and 2mc² = 2 fotons. why they go in an angle of 180°, well thats just a fact of observation. why cant 2 positive particles not aniihilate, well thats because they both ARE positive..so there is nothing to anihilate
I'm a creationist, and quite frankly this theory of evolution doesn't make sense...where did time come from? where did the one universal force come from? where did the mass come from? where did the energy for temperature come from? this gives more questions than answers. however, If you have answers, I would like to know them...but until then, this is just downright stupid.
@Canadarocksish ok well counter argument where did god come from when u can come up with some logical explenation like the one ur expecting from us to explain our ideas then i will listen but u dont and bc u dont shut up
@swagnerization quite simple, God created everything, and he has power over everything (including time). however, God lives outside of time, which is why he is eternal. He has no end and no beginning (which is hard for us to think about, especially since we live inside of time).
@Bsblob please expand on what you mean. are you as a Christian saying that that view point is wrong? or as an evolutionist saying God didn't create the world, or even exists? or something else maybe...
@Canadarocksish for sake of discussion evolution is usually defined as the gradual adaptation of biology, the big bang is the commonly accepted theory for how the universe began.
hope that helps to understand what i meant in my second sentence.
@BeyCuber We regularly MAKE antimatter particles in the laboratory. And antimatter particles can be created in natural reactions as well. These particles last only long enough to encounter normal matter and they are gone. If the experimenters can contain these particles with various forces, then antimatter experiments can be done using them.
is it ruled out that half the universe was antimatter and it separated far enough in space after inflation, to not interact enough for us to detect it?
@cassiopeiaproject If I'm not mistaken, half of the equation of the Standard Model deals with the interactions of all the particles excluding gravitational interaction, except that this half alone makes no sense because it leaves all the particles massless. The other half of the Standard Model equation "gives" particles mass and requires the existence of the Higgs Boson.
@gromtkn The time interval 10**-43 is known as the Planck time. (Google Planck units for a long explanation.) The Planck time is the time it takes for light to travel one Planck distance. At smaller distances and shorter times, quantum gravitational effects are thought to affect both space and time severely. So until we have a successful quantum-gravity theory, we have no idea what happens to space-time at shorter distances and shorter times.
@Hitch2500 Detecting a graviton is hard, as it is only interact with the gravitational force and in quantum levels it is so weak, it is completely overwhelmed by the other forces.
@TomCatFort You can detect gravitons within or around dark matter. Since dark matter is non-baryonic in nature, it is not overwhelmed by the presence of other standard model particles. However, it's not easy to model dark matter in a laboratory. You can also detect anti-gravitons within or around dark energy, for the same reason. We're not at the stage of scientific development, at least public scientific development, to prove the existence of the graviton.
@buzzin1975 Also, it is possible to utilize dark energy as a means of generating anti-gravitons for propulsion. This type of exotic propulsion, however, is far more difficult to implement than conventional electrogravitic systems, which are often adequate for achieving anti-gravitic propulsion.
So there are suppose to be these little particles at a fixed magnitude and mass (mass=0) that cause gravity, but also have unlimited range so to speak. It would explain why they could travel at the speed of light if they have no mass, but if they are particles of energy moving outward, why would that cause attraction?
@steeveyneon Trying to visualize an actual particle-particle interaction at the quantum level is always going to inadequately depict what happens. As shown in our "QED" video, the actual interaction as seen on a macro scale is an average of an infinite number of probability amplitudes. Some of these amplitudes have negative signs on them when attractive forces are involved. Don't push the visualization of a single exchange too far in trying to understand an attractive force.
@steeveyneon Since the known exchange bosons have different properties, it is only at extremely high energies and temperatures that they behave the same and act like a combined super-force. As the universe expanded and cooled, the different properties of the exchange bosons make the forces easily distinguishable.
7:53 What you are saying is, as mass approaches 0, range approaches infinity. This is true in the case of the photon and the (theoretical) graviton, although you do have a slight inaccuracy. The strong nuclear force is meditated by the massless gluon, but it has a range about the size of a proton. If your statement was true, the strong force would have infinite range, which it does not. Please make sure to check your information before you put it in your video.
@SpaceTime4D We did not say that the mass of the gauge boson was the ONLY factor that influenced the range of a force. It is certainly true that a gauge boson with mass cannot have an infinite range. But as you point out, a massless gauge boson is not a guarantee that the force will have an infinite range.
@SpaceTime4D (cont.) Because the gluons carry the color charge themselves, they generate secondary virtual gluons themselves; and these generate more gluons and so on. This is what limits the range of the color force. The video is accurate in what it says.
@WouldbeSage It is presumed that the Big Bang created equal amounts of matter and anti-matter. Then some as yet unknown mechanism caused matter to be asymmetrically preferred. What antimatter was left annihilated itself through collisions with matter. Since there was more matter than anti-matter, when all anti-matter was gone, we were left with a universe populated with normal matter.
@nafativedec Well, that's one way to look at it. It's field, which is basically an "area" with defined values for each point within that area. But in quantum mechanics, particles mediate the forces.
The simplest way to put it is that these particles DO exist, and also DON'T. If you're dealing with classical mechanics, then you can imagine a field as just an area upon which a force acts, somehow. But in quantum electrodynamics you do have to picture virtual photons being exchanged.
the universe appeared out of nothing or more likely the chance collision of m branes creating multiverses stackied upon each other timewise - respect to all who got this far
if the range of the force is affected by the mass of the gauge boson, gluons which are massless should have infinite range shouldn't they ? but then why is the strong nuclear force limited to a given range?
@Neeraj12345678987654 The range of the strong nuclear force (color force) is limited by the fact that the gluons carry the color property themselves. Unlike the photon for example that has no electric charge and yet is the carrier of the electric force, the gluons generate secondary virtual gluons and those generate tertiary virtual gluons and so on. This severely limits the range of the color force.
is there a video that goes deeper into detail about the uncountable tiny particles ( iguess so called Virtual Particles are meant) that fill the space around the Electron for example? In the Video it is claimed that the energy needed by that particle can be created out of nothing. That made some alarm bells go off.
Out of nothing or undetectable? has this to do with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states we know position or momentum, but not both; but this creates a corollary, that to know position and momentum is impossible, thus we see force particles, or other things, appear at such times. Outside the Universe is nothing, the Universe box; but this violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, as we know position and momentum; thus, the Universe is infinite as it filled with energy and has no beginning, the Big Bang is a math tool.
space-time was once the smallest single thing that could have ever been. space-time began to manipulate itself. during manipulation random tweeks of space time happen. these tweeks are different types of energy. without gravity these energies began to decay creating the weak nuclear force. when the decaying energies hit other decaying energies this created matter and the strong nuclear force when these three things were on the same plane of space-time matter began to coalesce. when this happened
@MyRotflCopterGoesSoi Conservation of energy is violated by the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. And the expanding universe may also violate the conservation of energy.
The more that I watch these videos, and the more I learn about the complexities of our universe, the more I realize the utter impossibility and stupidity of the Big Bang Theory.
Really, interesting. Tell the guys on the LHC that rofl. Just because you can't understand something with your feeble brain doesn't mean it isn't real. In fact our knowledge of the universe and whatever else exists (dimensions etc) will be revealed in time, but probably not for another couple hundred years at least I would say.
@Baldwynmayhem Can't understand it? I don't call it bogus because I can't understand it. I call it bogus because I have a deeper understanding of how it functions.
well post it up if you have an inate knowledge of how the universe started. Instead of just blasting people ans spouting crap from your mouth, post it up so everyone can see your theory.
@EzekielSwapp I think its stupid how everyone believes everything that comes out of a scientists mouth as if its gospel truth when there whole theory could be compeletly proven wrong down the road and sometimes it is. People should do there own research or read everything they can on the subject and gain an understanding of how it works before believeing everything they are told.
Fair enough that's all you had to say, and I agree with you, this isn't set in stone till 100% proven, like I said this will take time, it's still a viable theory at the moment though, we'll find out more when the LHC pumps up to 7 TeV hopefully
does he have boobs?
georgetroulis 1 week ago in playlist Liked videos
Mind = blown
flamingo0123 3 weeks ago
@flamingo0123 It should, since this is all nonsense. The universe is far easier than generally assumed.
Nomasain 2 days ago
This is the best video on this topic on youtube! (Y)
antipoti 3 weeks ago
@antipoti Why? Its a massive load of BS.
Nomasain 2 days ago
Ok understood, but is there any theory in physics that explains why the bing bang happened? i.e Why that infinetely small and dense ''Thing'' appeared?
BlueDemeter 1 month ago
@BlueDemeter M theory claims to have an explanation using higher dimensional membrane collisions. All that standard physics can say is that, once you have that singularity, the nonexistence of time in a singularity (even stupendously unlikely events happen "instantaneously" if time does not pass) combined with the requirement that entropy increase (a singularity is maximal entropy for its volume, so the only way to increase entropy is to expand) makes its expansion inevitable.
EntropicPrinciple 1 month ago
@BlueDemeter It's good to remain sceptic. To me this video is full of BS.
Nomasain 2 days ago
I cant tell if I fell asleep half-way through and that's why I don't understand, or if it's just above my head. I'm going with the latter- and a ice-pack for my damaged brain.
621jacob 1 month ago
4:10 You're talking about photons, right? They shoot out a bunch of photons?
RasmusLastname 1 month ago
Comment removed
JFStarwood 1 month ago
there's a 5th fundamental force - dark energy
gwendance 2 months ago
@gwendance can you explain why?
PenguinCookies94 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
@gwendance that's not part of the standard model. dark energy, dark matter, antimatter, asymmetry, super symmetry, extra dimensions, quantum gravity, wormholes, micro black holes, etc. are all separate topics.
brandeezy108 3 weeks ago
• SandustanBrasov
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Unuverse let it dilate entirely
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• Sand ustanBrasov
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The unified law of Newton will throw at rubbish Einstein’s relativity, with Big bang, black holes, singularity and holes of worm. With these methaphysical theories and animation about absorption the Eartn or Sun it destroy logical thinking and reason at man. With this dissiness enter man in terrestrial life, and no more believe that he has a future. Result thus blocking of the society, which lead at general corruption of society and at her sodominess and dissoluteness.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The UNIFIED LAW is the LAW of the UNIVERSAL ATTRACTION FORCES= of the GRAVITATIONAL INTERACTION FORCES = of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD FORCES produced by the inner movement of the inertial rotation of the ethereal matter from bodies and substances. This, because, the ethereal particles are in continuous movement through the them nature, being electrical – produce electrical energy, being named and electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
Isaac Newton establishes the basic notion of classical mechanics, proved the universal attraction law and put base of the celestial mechanics. Newton had affirmed THAT IT HASN’T EXIST NATURAL PROCESS WHO HASN’T PRODUCED BY ATTRACTION AND REPULSION ACTIVE FORCES WHICH REGULATES THE CELESTIAL BODIES MOVEMENT AND THE BODIES FALING DOWN,THAT LEEDS THE CHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL PROCESSES,fact which makes that the universal attraction law acts as in macrocosmos and as in microcosmos.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
• But the ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The notion of dark matter and dark energy proceed from theoretical physics, from relativity theory of the A. Einstein, from the mistaken interpretation of the physical reality. Something exist indeed: and matter and energy; but is the much ethereal matter and the her energys from the her frame. Dark energy and cosmic acceleration are a failure of relativity of the Einstein. Dark energy is the ethereal energy and this can be harness it!
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
SandustanBrasov
• In 1905, A.Einstein conclude that the ether hasn't a correspondent in reality and constitute not a medium which let can serve as reference system. Thus Einstein renounced to the ether notion and absolute space and emits the two restricted relativity principles. By it content the second principle excludes the ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement - the light speed - and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality.
sandustanBrasov 2 months ago
i love this kinda stuff
AdrianGordon1231 2 months ago 6
he looks like a cross between professor X and the silver surfer
fishzard 3 months ago
Wait, so gravity and the strong force just kinda stopped working all of a sudden?
eggsstink 4 months ago
04:48 "But they also must disappear in the briefest instant... Because the energy used to create them can only exist for a very brief instance"
Why use "because" when you are not able to explain something in a meaningful way?
Idol2011no 4 months ago
@Idol2011no because it's hard to explain university-level physics in a youtube video. Look up Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (in relation to energy and time) if you wanna know more
Coletrain424 3 months ago
@Coletrain424, Didn't it occour to you I might new my Heisenberg and Schrödinger well? Or maybe you just can't read or understand what you read.
Idol2011no 3 months ago
@Idol2011no "because" should be "since", then.
Smartboy7 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Smartboy7, both "because" and "since" are terms that offer an explaination that is either obvious or where a reasonable explaination follows. "the energy used to create them can only exist for a very brief instance" is no explaination, but a loose claim. When not understanding why something can come from nothingness, you obviously don't know for a fact that it can't be in existence for only a short time. A reasonable human being should not state such inconsistent rant.
Idol2011no 2 months ago
@GBY95 they suggest that the air is poluted and you can see it because of that.
AnLa061095 4 months ago
What does "air is matter, even though you can't see it, unless you're in Los Angeles" mean?
GBY95 4 months ago
You made a mistake in the beginning of the video. the *entire* universe didn't expand from a single point. Only the visible universe expanded from a near single point. the infinite density would have reached out infinitely as well. it just expanded INTO that infinity after the big bang.
Everfalling 5 months ago
I honestly have so much respect for scientists and people who understand some of the wonders of the universe. I love the universe and i'd give anything to be able to understand the mathematical equations, the terminology, EVERYTHING! i love science! <3
carrots667 5 months ago
@carrots667
i love science too, i had a D in physics only to discover years later that i love physics and i study in my free time the standard model, quantum physics etc although doing all the math really isn't my thing, but having some understanding of it is pretty cool_ if you invest some time in it you will understand all the terminology
Tygrychu 4 months ago
@gromtkn sorry its late and i gave u a rather vague and "rude" answer to your question of why we can't talk about a time being smaller than 10^-43 seconds. this is a Planck Time, which is the time it takes for light, the fastest thing in existance, to travel one Planck Length. a time ANY slower than 10^-43 seconds is indistinguishable because it's impossible to to measure any change in anything, even a photon of light hasn't moved when measured in less than 10^-43
cabot2jville2010 6 months ago
@canadarockish you say "billion light YEARS!" in the misunderstanding of a light year being a unit of time, it is a unit of distance related to time. if you wanted to you could call a meter a Light 10^-34 second (made up number for light traveling a meter) so yes the universe could have and did expand to the size of billions of light years in just 1 second. if you want just say quintillion to the quintillion meters wide in just 1 second (also made up off the top of my head)
cabot2jville2010 6 months ago
@gromtkn thats like asking why there isn't anyting lower than absolute zero, why is -273 C absolute zero? why not -274C ? because we invented the idea of time or temperature in a mathematical sense and therefore quantized it. so there is a point where it can't get any smaller.
cabot2jville2010 6 months ago
Question:
You obviously know your shit, but I'm confused on a couple things... 1.) Electromagnetism is a force derived from electrically charged particles interacting somehow, and strong force is the force that keeps these electrically charged particles in check with one another, correct? 2.) Is the photon (gauge boson) the same photon as one emitted by a shift in energy level (via electron), if so doesn't that mean that it can't arise from nothing (AKA virtual particle)??
Airgutter87 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the outer is the source not theinner just trust me. factor that in for everything and it all makes sense. think about it. think the universe like a hologram a human would look out and be blinded by the outer wall and the sun would help light things around us my girl is deaf and if i stand in front of the sun shhe cant see my lips so think the original light source as the darkness of space we need stars to see around us like a hologram we are blinded by the spotlight that created us
jchino723 8 months ago
Hey, I'm kinda confused...
So electrically charged particles constantly emit photons. What's their wavelength? And how is it possible that they emit like really many of these all the time, but for example when an electron and a positron are annihilated, there will be only two gamma ray photons?
If a neg and a pos particles exchange photons, why can't two positives as well? What's the difference between electron and positron? What exactly makes one negative and the other positive?
Mostwantedo 10 months ago
@Mostwantedo These are VIRTUAL particles. They have all possible wavelengths, and they disappear before they violate the uncertainty principle restrictions. Two positive particles DO exchange virtual photons -- this results in the repulsive force that they "feel".
cassiopeiaproject 10 months ago 6
@Mostwantedo 1) why 2 gamma ray fotons. well you probably know E=mc² now, if i tell you that a positron = -electron then the masses are identical, so the energie is the same, now if they anihilate you get 2mc², and 2mc² = 2 fotons. why they go in an angle of 180°, well thats just a fact of observation. why cant 2 positive particles not aniihilate, well thats because they both ARE positive..so there is nothing to anihilate
deyomash 2 months ago
Hey, who made these series! They're awesome!
Mostwantedo 10 months ago
The other day I've learned how many atoms are in a grain of salt: about 1.2 *10 ^ 18, or: 1,200,000,000,000,000,000 atoms.
That fact alone multiplied my admiration for particle physicists by at least a billion :-)
cristianfcao 10 months ago
if it's called local gauge symetry and gravity isn't included. is that because gravity has infinite range?
also i thought that all 3 neutrinos had the same rest mass(energy varries on frequency/momentum) and that they were all 3 stable?
nybotheveg 1 year ago
I'm a creationist, and quite frankly this theory of evolution doesn't make sense...where did time come from? where did the one universal force come from? where did the mass come from? where did the energy for temperature come from? this gives more questions than answers. however, If you have answers, I would like to know them...but until then, this is just downright stupid.
Canadarocksish 1 year ago
@Canadarocksish ok well counter argument where did god come from when u can come up with some logical explenation like the one ur expecting from us to explain our ideas then i will listen but u dont and bc u dont shut up
swagnerization 1 year ago
@swagnerization quite simple, God created everything, and he has power over everything (including time). however, God lives outside of time, which is why he is eternal. He has no end and no beginning (which is hard for us to think about, especially since we live inside of time).
Canadarocksish 1 year ago
@Canadarocksish
nope you're very wrong
Bsblob 1 year ago
@Bsblob please expand on what you mean. are you as a Christian saying that that view point is wrong? or as an evolutionist saying God didn't create the world, or even exists? or something else maybe...
Canadarocksish 1 year ago
@Canadarocksish i really don't care for this debate but i have to ask... what the heck does evolution have to do with the big bang?
i'm pretty sure even if we subscribed to genesis, biology was created some *time* after time and light, considering it took 7 *days*.
reinux 10 months ago
@reinux I typically refer to as evolution as the evolving of the universe and animals. I'm not sure what you mean by your last sentence either.
Canadarocksish 10 months ago
@Canadarocksish for sake of discussion evolution is usually defined as the gradual adaptation of biology, the big bang is the commonly accepted theory for how the universe began.
hope that helps to understand what i meant in my second sentence.
reinux 10 months ago
Evolution. It's magically delicious!
abobjenkins 1 year ago
Wait, so there is NO more anti-matter? (2:08). then how do scientists hold them? Like, in the chambers
BeyCuber 1 year ago
@BeyCuber We regularly MAKE antimatter particles in the laboratory. And antimatter particles can be created in natural reactions as well. These particles last only long enough to encounter normal matter and they are gone. If the experimenters can contain these particles with various forces, then antimatter experiments can be done using them.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject
is it ruled out that half the universe was antimatter and it separated far enough in space after inflation, to not interact enough for us to detect it?
emwaver 5 months ago
so the higgs boson is the missing piece of the standard model?
dynastyflygon 1 year ago
@dynastyflygon The Higgs is the only particle predicted to exist by the Standard Model that has not yet been observed.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject If I'm not mistaken, half of the equation of the Standard Model deals with the interactions of all the particles excluding gravitational interaction, except that this half alone makes no sense because it leaves all the particles massless. The other half of the Standard Model equation "gives" particles mass and requires the existence of the Higgs Boson.
Is this accurate?
ShallowThoughts 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject Graviton as well
bigballs989 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject I thought that the graviton has only been predicted as well.
Mostwantedo 11 months ago
@Mostwantedo True.
cassiopeiaproject 11 months ago
@gromtkn The time interval 10**-43 is known as the Planck time. (Google Planck units for a long explanation.) The Planck time is the time it takes for light to travel one Planck distance. At smaller distances and shorter times, quantum gravitational effects are thought to affect both space and time severely. So until we have a successful quantum-gravity theory, we have no idea what happens to space-time at shorter distances and shorter times.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago 2
@Hitch2500 Detecting a graviton is hard, as it is only interact with the gravitational force and in quantum levels it is so weak, it is completely overwhelmed by the other forces.
TomCatFort 1 year ago
@TomCatFort You can detect gravitons within or around dark matter. Since dark matter is non-baryonic in nature, it is not overwhelmed by the presence of other standard model particles. However, it's not easy to model dark matter in a laboratory. You can also detect anti-gravitons within or around dark energy, for the same reason. We're not at the stage of scientific development, at least public scientific development, to prove the existence of the graviton.
buzzin1975 1 year ago
@buzzin1975 Also, it is possible to utilize dark energy as a means of generating anti-gravitons for propulsion. This type of exotic propulsion, however, is far more difficult to implement than conventional electrogravitic systems, which are often adequate for achieving anti-gravitic propulsion.
buzzin1975 1 year ago
Neutrinos change flavor over time, so all the three generation can be found in the universe, with significant amount.
TomCatFort 1 year ago
So there are suppose to be these little particles at a fixed magnitude and mass (mass=0) that cause gravity, but also have unlimited range so to speak. It would explain why they could travel at the speed of light if they have no mass, but if they are particles of energy moving outward, why would that cause attraction?
steeveyneon 1 year ago
@steeveyneon Trying to visualize an actual particle-particle interaction at the quantum level is always going to inadequately depict what happens. As shown in our "QED" video, the actual interaction as seen on a macro scale is an average of an infinite number of probability amplitudes. Some of these amplitudes have negative signs on them when attractive forces are involved. Don't push the visualization of a single exchange too far in trying to understand an attractive force.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
If all the forces were really united in the beginning of the universe, why would they have conflict and separate?
steeveyneon 1 year ago
@steeveyneon Since the known exchange bosons have different properties, it is only at extremely high energies and temperatures that they behave the same and act like a combined super-force. As the universe expanded and cooled, the different properties of the exchange bosons make the forces easily distinguishable.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
7:53 What you are saying is, as mass approaches 0, range approaches infinity. This is true in the case of the photon and the (theoretical) graviton, although you do have a slight inaccuracy. The strong nuclear force is meditated by the massless gluon, but it has a range about the size of a proton. If your statement was true, the strong force would have infinite range, which it does not. Please make sure to check your information before you put it in your video.
SpaceTime4D 1 year ago
@SpaceTime4D We did not say that the mass of the gauge boson was the ONLY factor that influenced the range of a force. It is certainly true that a gauge boson with mass cannot have an infinite range. But as you point out, a massless gauge boson is not a guarantee that the force will have an infinite range.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@SpaceTime4D (cont.) Because the gluons carry the color charge themselves, they generate secondary virtual gluons themselves; and these generate more gluons and so on. This is what limits the range of the color force. The video is accurate in what it says.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Make an effort Naughty bride in your area mworld5.info
WillowXana 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject
1:55 What do you mean, "all anti-matter has disappeared?"
WouldbeSage 1 year ago
@WouldbeSage It is presumed that the Big Bang created equal amounts of matter and anti-matter. Then some as yet unknown mechanism caused matter to be asymmetrically preferred. What antimatter was left annihilated itself through collisions with matter. Since there was more matter than anti-matter, when all anti-matter was gone, we were left with a universe populated with normal matter.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject Thanks!
WouldbeSage 1 year ago
How was time created?
Canadarocksish 1 year ago
why did antimatter "disappear"
derickhaywood 1 year ago
What about magnetism? What bosons does magnetism have?
nafativedec 1 year ago
@nafativedec Magnetism is only one part of the force electromagnetism. Electromagnetism's gauge boson is the photon.
Juxtaroberto 1 year ago
@Juxtaroberto So the field around the permanent magnet is made of photons? If so why didn't we detect them allready (or did we? I am really curious)
nafativedec 1 year ago
@nafativedec Well, that's one way to look at it. It's field, which is basically an "area" with defined values for each point within that area. But in quantum mechanics, particles mediate the forces.
The simplest way to put it is that these particles DO exist, and also DON'T. If you're dealing with classical mechanics, then you can imagine a field as just an area upon which a force acts, somehow. But in quantum electrodynamics you do have to picture virtual photons being exchanged.
Juxtaroberto 1 year ago
@nafativedec Magnetism is part of the electromagnetic force, and the photon is the boson.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
yay, particle fysics explained by dr. manhattan of the watchmen!
slisherslash 1 year ago
at 1:05, how big could it have gotten...more than or less than a light year?
Canadarocksish 1 year ago
@Canadarocksish It could have gotten billions of light years across.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject so within less than a second it could have gotten over a billion light YEARS?!
Canadarocksish 1 year ago
the universe appeared out of nothing or more likely the chance collision of m branes creating multiverses stackied upon each other timewise - respect to all who got this far
Hoogliette 1 year ago
If we can prove in the LHC that these "particles" can appear out of nowhere can we then say that the universe came out of nothing?
Peon547 1 year ago
@Peon547 See our "Universe" video.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
why she has big (.) (.)
flyingskorpion 1 year ago
that's sometimes easier than they sometimes put it. What caused the the universe to expand?
KryptonSoft 1 year ago
so basically what your saying is, it was the biggest fireworks show eva?
brennanww 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why does the strong nuclear force has a given range is the gluons ( gauge bosons of the strong nuclear force ) have no rest mass.
thanks for the video
Neeraj12345678987654 1 year ago
why does the strong nuclear force has a given range is the gluons ( gauge bosons of the strong nuclear force ) have no rest mass.
thanks for the video
Neeraj12345678987654 1 year ago
if the range of the force is affected by the mass of the gauge boson, gluons which are massless should have infinite range shouldn't they ? but then why is the strong nuclear force limited to a given range?
thanks for the video
Neeraj12345678987654 1 year ago
@Neeraj12345678987654 The range of the strong nuclear force (color force) is limited by the fact that the gluons carry the color property themselves. Unlike the photon for example that has no electric charge and yet is the carrier of the electric force, the gluons generate secondary virtual gluons and those generate tertiary virtual gluons and so on. This severely limits the range of the color force.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
why the horrible computer animated people? i doubt this was made for 5 year olds...
tehdusto 1 year ago
I lost all focus when I saw the BOOBS !!!!!
utsavman47 1 year ago
is there a video that goes deeper into detail about the uncountable tiny particles ( iguess so called Virtual Particles are meant) that fill the space around the Electron for example? In the Video it is claimed that the energy needed by that particle can be created out of nothing. That made some alarm bells go off.
Out of nothing or undetectable? has this to do with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle?
Aanthanur 1 year ago
excellent presentation
marcehole 1 year ago
RealLY hot, realLY fast.
RobertHartlepool 1 year ago
Excellent presentation!
arcturian627 1 year ago
Energy from nothing.
Why is 10 to the -43 the smallest amount of time that one can talk about?
archedmandible 1 year ago
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states we know position or momentum, but not both; but this creates a corollary, that to know position and momentum is impossible, thus we see force particles, or other things, appear at such times. Outside the Universe is nothing, the Universe box; but this violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, as we know position and momentum; thus, the Universe is infinite as it filled with energy and has no beginning, the Big Bang is a math tool.
WOWJBEOWULF 1 year ago
space-time was once the smallest single thing that could have ever been. space-time began to manipulate itself. during manipulation random tweeks of space time happen. these tweeks are different types of energy. without gravity these energies began to decay creating the weak nuclear force. when the decaying energies hit other decaying energies this created matter and the strong nuclear force when these three things were on the same plane of space-time matter began to coalesce. when this happened
davidurock 1 year ago
The last time I checked the three primary colors are YELLOW, red and blue. Green is a secondary color. Makes me wonder what else they got wrong.
followjesusonly1 1 year ago
I thought energy could not be created, ever. Am I missing something?
Is everything I know and love about science wrong?
Screw this, I'll just be a dope dealer.
MyRotflCopterGoesSoi 1 year ago
@MyRotflCopterGoesSoi Conservation of energy is violated by the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. And the expanding universe may also violate the conservation of energy.
cassiopeiaproject 1 year ago
@cassiopeiaproject the Unlawful Universe? :D
Aanthanur 1 year ago
how would that superforce behave? and why did the forces separate?
uut0 1 year ago
ha this is crap
33SaintBernards 1 year ago
The "Diana" character is doing wonderful things for stereotypes of women. Awesome vid ;-)
LordSolaris 1 year ago
Gravity is a loner, it seperated first.
You forgot HIGGS!!!!
Hey wait a second ... the beginning is the same as the end!!!
Anthonyk312 1 year ago
Now I can clearly see the Force that moves the universe!
8nwidth 1 year ago
How much did it cost to get Dr. Manhattan to star in this video?
tenvol823 1 year ago
wow!
Bhaddiya 1 year ago
The more that I watch these videos, and the more I learn about the complexities of our universe, the more I realize the utter impossibility and stupidity of the Big Bang Theory.
libtechsk8er 1 year ago
lol unless you go to la
StudiosIMax 1 year ago
Most of this is bogus.
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
Really, interesting. Tell the guys on the LHC that rofl. Just because you can't understand something with your feeble brain doesn't mean it isn't real. In fact our knowledge of the universe and whatever else exists (dimensions etc) will be revealed in time, but probably not for another couple hundred years at least I would say.
Baldwynmayhem 1 year ago
@Baldwynmayhem Can't understand it? I don't call it bogus because I can't understand it. I call it bogus because I have a deeper understanding of how it functions.
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
Well then please post up your viewpoints on it all, I and I'm sure others would be greatly interested.
Baldwynmayhem 1 year ago
@Baldwynmayhem I'm sure they would.
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
well post it up if you have an inate knowledge of how the universe started. Instead of just blasting people ans spouting crap from your mouth, post it up so everyone can see your theory.
Baldwynmayhem 1 year ago
@Baldwynmayhem I don't have to reveal any knowledge and I can spout and blast all day long if I wan't.
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
@EzekielSwapp I think its stupid how everyone believes everything that comes out of a scientists mouth as if its gospel truth when there whole theory could be compeletly proven wrong down the road and sometimes it is. People should do there own research or read everything they can on the subject and gain an understanding of how it works before believeing everything they are told.
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
Fair enough that's all you had to say, and I agree with you, this isn't set in stone till 100% proven, like I said this will take time, it's still a viable theory at the moment though, we'll find out more when the LHC pumps up to 7 TeV hopefully
Baldwynmayhem 1 year ago
@Baldwynmayhem I can't wait to see what they might discover.
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
Although the things they theorize may not be completely true, it still contributes to the knowledge of everything we currently know today.
silos201 1 year ago
@silos201 Yeah but sometimes they try to cram theories down kids throats as if they are 100% true.
EzekielSwapp 1 year ago
@EzekielSwapp - No that sounds much more like religion.
MarvelsofaLifetime 1 year ago
Comment removed
gwhillikens 1 year ago
OMG, I was watching her....I thought the same thing and read your post.. yeah, they are huge. LOL
MrBeef79 2 years ago
she has massive tits
lethalgunn 2 years ago 2