@freemanx2x IMO there is no single frequency of the aether. Frequencies come from the largest scale downwards. For a tensile medium there is no limit.
I think if you extend the existence of waves into the fifth and sixth dimension, you will find that explaining quantum phenomena becomes easier.
Third, I am unclear as to how your theory explains interactions among particles; does your theory predict the existence of force particles? if so, how does it explain their functionality?
Fourth, how does your theory explain the expansion of the universe: if the structure of the universe aligns with harmonics, won't that alignment be lost in time?
@Kevin4381 the full details of particle interactions remains to be solved. The idea is that spherical standing waves interact. Look for the work of Gabriel LaFreniere on matter is made of waves for some indications on possible particle interactions.
@Kevin4381 The question about loss of alignment is a very important one. In my view there are many waves from immensely large to incredibly small. Harmonics natural develop the smaller waves near the wave centres of large waves because the non-linearity is greater there, i.e., nucleons at centre of atoms, Sun at centre of solar system etc.
These larger waves are responsible for the deformations which cause the smaller waves points of convergence to move about.
@Kevin4381 The test for this is that motions at one level must correspond to cycles at the next level up. I have found that this does indeed happen. Solar system dynamics do relate to stellar wave sizes and so on.
I really found your videos fascinating. I do have a few questions:
First, can you explain some of the strange quantum phenomena such as entanglement using your theory?
Second, I think you might be able to improve your theory by exploring the possibility of harmonics in higher dimensions. I know you have so far disregarded higher dimensions, but I think this is a mistake: Time, for example, is clearly a 'dimension' of reality in which waves might exist and produce interesting effects ... (cont..)
@Kevin4381 I agree that time is a dimension, and think that is sufficient along with the 3 spacial dimensions.
Entanglement is etc is really just confusion regarding sub-sample statistics. I have more on this in my talk that you will find if you search for: ray tomes cycles research FSMN WSM
WSM reminds me of the Spanda School of Trika Kashmir Shaivism. Spanda is an atemporal vibration, throb, pulse or quiver that creates everyting, both the objective exterior reality and the subjective world. Utimate movement takes place not in space or time but within Supreme Consciousness/Awareness *Cit* as a cycle of internalization and externalization of consciousness itself. This rhythmic contraction and expansion (visarga) is a contractive movement that results in a return to the origin.
@MySocksSmell2 I received a message from someone viewing my video on human harmonics sating that they had seen the figure of 40 Hz for a consciousness cycle. That 40 Hz frequency is the 72nd harmonic of the human body and relates to acupuncture points, vertebrae, ribs and finger joints etc.
There rarely seems to be discussion about how the big bang theory came to be. It seems more of a brand name than anything else, perhaps to demonstrate an "understanding" of the universe beyond what the governments and funding organizations can grasp, so they say "we leave it in your hands", here is a 100 million dollars for research.
After I watched your video, the idea of waves in matter, and harmonics to explain the different properties of physics, MAKES SENSE, right off the bat. Thanks.
@ricktbdgc Yes, I find that explanation of everything in terms of waves is naturally appealing to people because it meshes with so many other areas of understanding.
This video makes me think of the creation theory of sacred geometry mixed with a little m-theory. I love it. Thank you for putting in all the time and effort to find this data :)
I will be looking into your theory, this stuff is awesome. I'm still reserved as to how "some guy on YouTube" could have gotten the whole thing correct before all the physicists, but stranger things have happened.
In my private thoughts I've also imagined something very much like your theory. But I'm no physicist. Also, because I'm not at all familiar with the language of mathematics (I'm a programmer and visual thinker) I can't verify many of these things myself.
@JuusoAlasuutari Thanks for the kind comments. Well, I didn't start out as "some guy on YouTube" because lots of this work happened before the internet. But we move with the times. I have been pleasantly surprised at the quality of the comments and questions in YouTube.
Thanks Ray! Can you please provide ideas about "what" got the jelly to start wobbling? Also, can you provide ideas on why static waves don't burn out. Thanks!
@FlyingWig I always think that it started like the oiled up guy hitting in the gong in the start of the old Rank movies (we call this big bong theory) ;-)
In harmonics theory all waves are losing energy to harmonics and so getting weaker. Of course most waves are all receiving energy from sub-harmonics and so also getting stronger. But generally the shift is to higher frequencies. This means that low frequencies are doing something like exponential decay. Gravity is a result of this.
Unfortunately I know nothing about harmonics and therefore left it as something I could speculate upon it at a later time.
You have just confirmed everything I was thinking. In a few hours your theory made more sense than 3 years of studying quantum mechanics ever has...Everything I've been thinking...there actually may be something substantial to it?
Thank you!! You've opened a world of possibilities. I don't know what to do with myself... I have to study harmonics! But I need sleep first.
Simply amazing... I think I'm in awe. I've only been studying contemporary physics for a few years and while I'm a novice I was disagreeing with a lot of what I was reading. For a number of reasons I began thinking of matter as purely a wave. I didn't how to describe it but it made more sense than to think of matter as a particle.
My studies also suggested there was some kind of link between music and the universe due to the patterns that I saw from the material I was learning from.
Hi Ray, Great videos! Your work reminded me of the body's harmonics via the balanced chakra's, they each have a frequency and when all are balanced the body works at it's best. Your work also makes me think of the solfeggio harmonics
maybee there is no universe and the only thing out there is data, and depending on what you use to perceive that data, it shows up however it does on that device, and that data has its averages like any data. and our whole lives are just interpreted data. and YOU are the only thing that exists, just you and data, and you are seeing us and all these things though your perception of it. haha no im just kidding. ...maybe. oooooooooh..... .... ... .. . .. ... .... ..... .... ... .. ...... .. ... ..
I'm not sure I follow how you have to have an infinite universe as a conclusion of this idea, but since you do, I was wondering if there is an answer in this wave idea to Olbers' paradox? Just curious.
I don't know whether the Universe is infinite or not.
But either way, Olber's paradox is not a problem. If the average energy density of the universe is finite at some point in time, then it can never become infinite at some time in the future (as OOLber's paradox assumes). Therefore there must be a mistake in the assumptions. That mistake is assuming that stars have infinite lives. They don't. The assumption is also made that energy absorbed by dust is recycled - maybe as new stars?
Hi Lufo, I accidentally deleted your next message which said:
Oh, I guess I got from part of this that you were saying the interpretation that the universe was expanding based on redshift is wrong. So if the universe is finite, but not expanding, what maintains its structure over such long periods?
The maths was discovered by Maxwell nearly 150 years ago. But people did not recognize that matter fits those equations also. Actually a famous mathematician named Clifford did realize, but he died before he convinced people. Schroedinger's maths also is correct and he understood that is was not about probabilities but was real waves.
sooo... i understand the aether part of this... i think, but what your saying is because of the natural oscillations of the aether the universe naturally expands and contracts due to harmonics?
Woa you might have actually found the pattern that connects everything. Awesome! So the vibrations create vibrations that create vibrations and so on, and then they create a pattern that manifests on every possible scale and level of excistence?
I hope that as the Internet and other media make it easier to revisit our assumptions, we can reconstruct a different and more viable interpretation of the universe we live in, and thank you greatly for your contribution.
Some ten tests have been done successfully already. Several more can be done with existing data. Successful tests include:
* Predicting new particle of 68 times electron mass.
* Showing that 586 million year geological cycle matches 586 million light year galactic supercluster wall spacing if a certain value of Hubble constant is valid. Subsequent measures of Hubble constant do fit this.
Usually the standard chosen is A rather than C. Today it is set to 440 Hz. However it has varied over time and most often been a little higher than that. "Concert pitch" is sometimes set at 450 Hz. IMO that is nearer to the "true" frequency which is related to the Earth natural Schumann frequency as follows. Theoretical Schumann frequency = 7.5 Hz. The chord F-A-C is ratios 24:30:36 times that giving 180:225:270 Hz. Or 450 Hz for A in the next octave.
To put this another way, the ultimate starting point is the 1st harmonic. IMO it is a cycle that is most likely 1.4x10^23 years long. That is a D, almost 110 octaves below middle C.
thank you thank you! can i make a dvd of these and give it to lots of people? im annoyed extremely by the fact that this is "obscure" information and looked at as "new age" crap. i want to do everything i can to spread it to everyone. when i have kids i dont want them going to school and learning all that other crap. i think this absolutely NEEDS to be common knowledge.
Yes, if you include the original videos in full, then I have no objection. Please also include the links and info from the description with each video if possible.
Interesting, very interesting research field! Everything is cyclic in the cosmos, can't deny that and ancient people realized and observed this long time ago that everything is transient, dead is another beginning in the cycle of existence and non-existence. It is interesting what is it b/wn the cycles? What is the Ultimate Stuff of Reality beyond all transient universal realities, the Ultimate Vessel that potentiates this wave function?
b/wn = between, short version :) Do you also consider this "ultimate aether" to be in a state of Singularity? With endless informational-creative potential
You've wrapped alot of paradoxs that have boggled my mind into a neat, simple and perfect system.
Having been interested in cymatics, music & sound, electronics, engineering and many contrasting systems I'd been long on the path of trying to find the tangible link between all of them through vibration,and you've essentially accomplished this, much respect.
Hopefully the academic world will begin to accept these ideas and dedicate more time into their practical developments.
Thank you for your kind comments. The academic world does not work that way as the early quantum physicists noted. It works by new people having new ideas and the odl ones gradually dieing off. :-)
This is all very, very interesting! Having seen all three parts, I can tell this is so much in line with my own thinking. It is in accordance with chaos theory and the diagram at 0:55 is spot on similar to the temperature curves of the ice ages the last million years!
Search "Milankovitch cycles". I will have to get back to you with more when I have watched more of your work. You might like to check out Neal Adam´s "Prime Matter" and "growing earth" theories, (Youtube videos) in the mean time.
I came across growing Earth ideas and investigated it using GPS measurements that are made all around the world. I found that there is slow growth of the Earth according to GPS. Search "earth expansion ray tomes".
Thank you very much. I think you are on the rigth track too. Are you aware that hindu scientist regard the Divine as an occilation and believe that the universe started with one sound called Om or AUM. They were incredibally accurate in estimating the age of the earth and universe. I wonder if they thought along the same lines as you. In India they had universities 2500 hundred years ago with 50 subjects and tens of thousands of students. Alas the west goes on ignoring their knowledge.
Most religions include oscillations in the beginning. In Judaism and Christianity the phrases are In the beginning was the word, and let there be light.
Aum is interesting because the three parts a-u-m have many, moderate and few higher order harmonics.
Thank you for the very nice videos and I am adding them soon to my account in order to sprend the massage. Your are on the right track. I am a physicist and I would like to have a copy of the Book. If its possible. Thank you.
Subspace4d - sorry, I missed your message before. I don't have a book as such. If you go to my profile, you will find links to my website and other related matters which will hopefully give you what you want. If not, send me a message.
would it be possible for us to create that which is hard to find then? I mean if harmonics create matter could we not build a device to manipulate harmonics to produce what ever element we need. I would be very interested to see more on this subject. Any suggested reading? I would like to see more about the actual equations. Good videos.
Replying for 4th time - it seems that I cannot put links in a comment. See my main web site page on the maths of harmonics theory. See Milo Wolff's web site or his new book on the maths of WSM.
Making matter via electromagnetic waves is extremely tricky because the frequencies involved are greater than 10^23 Hz and effectively it is a nuclear explosion in reverse.
Who can say? If we propose some God to make it all and give it a push, then we need to explain what made the God and made him do that. How can we possibly ever come to a satisfactory start with no more questions?
Hello, I really appreciate what you're doing here. I'm interested on your thoughts about cycles, frequencies, and patterns pertaining to the galactic center and 2012. Some sort of consciousness shift into a higher frequency of perception maybe?
Hi Keteil, I have never found any evidence that anything special is going to happen in 2012. Often the same people that mention this also claim that the Earth's Schumann resonance is increasing in frequency. This is simply not true. It fluctuates over the 11 year sunspot cycle as well as over an annual cycle, but there is no uptrend beyond that.
I think that the year 2012 is just the Mayan equivalent to the Christian year 2000 which was going to have many disasters that didn't in fact happen.
I've been thinking, the æther is like a quintessential unmitigated energy, isn't that similar to what mystics have said for thousands of years? Except they said it was one all pervading consciousness and our consciousness is like one drop in this vast ætheric ocean. But consciousness doesn't mean our thoughts and feelings and observations, that is like muddied consciousness that must be overcome to get to the source, pure unsoiled consciousness. . .(continued below). . .
I think that the interpretation I have given of the aether has a lot in common with what mystics have said. I don't pretend to understand how consciousness arises in it - perhaps it is the other way around - matter and vibration arise in a consciousness. I don't know.
First of all, thank you Artynz for posting your findings. Since I realised at my youth that everything is made of vibrating matter, I have seen it everywhere.
Yes, prediction is the ultimate test of science. It is interesting that the second solar system discovered (around a pulsar) does show 3 planets at almost exactly half the distances of our systems first three planets from the Sun. This strongly supports the wave nature of planetary orbits.
Altogether I have made about 15 predictions with the theory and more than half of them have already been successfully confirmed. I will try to make more videos about these in the future.
what may be useful to help progress your views would to make predictions, for instance perhaps you could use your system to predict the types of planets that will be found around certian types of stars, something like this would make yours and others theories very dificult to ignore.
Hey ray I hope you keep posting vids I am enjoying what you have to say, it is very interesting. I think you and others like you are onto something very profound here.
Yes, base 12 shows the harmonic pattern more easily than base 10 because you just have to add a 0 many times. However there are still some ratios that don't fit base 12.
Will have to look up about Tesla's woodpecker beat.
Good questions GandalfDaBlack. Yes, looking at isotopes rather than elements is necessary because it is the mass of a nucleus that is important, because through E=m*c^2 and E=h*f mass is proportional to frequency of a nucleus. When that is done a harmonic pattern is found with the ratios of 2 and 3 and so on. It is clear that in this pattern nuclei of mass 7, 14, 28 and 56 are more abundant in the universe than other masses in their vicinity.
i dare say this also has something to do with the distance between primes. I was once playing with a Base-Prime counting system in excel (expressing all real integers as bitwise representations of prime numbers)
ie:
1 = 1
2 = 10
3 = 100
4 = 101
5 = 1000
6 = 1001
.. anyways, the pattern formed by counting in this manner seemed to remind me of one of your harmonic drawings.. but i'm sure you've already noticed this as well..
Yes, the strong harmonics are sort of the opposite extreme to the primes. Black vs White with the other numbers various shades of gray. So if one has a pattern of 12 so will the other.
This is great notice and it's because the binary system is the most simple and basic system. All numbering systems are harmonic, but since binary system is the most basic, it can show the basic pattern for all harmonics. And harmonics are related to prime numbers and Fibonacci pattern.
great series of videos here; I think you are definitely onto something with Harmonic Theory, as I too have been doing some personal research into the study of patterns.
I was wondering if you have tried re-modeling the periodic table of elements based on HT? Also, in the section where you mention the various rhythms of the universe; is this related to the "Woodpecker Beat" that Tesla spoke about?
Lastly, what are your thoughts on the metric system vs base-12?
If there were something approximating a steady state (I think there is actually gradual change due to harmonic formation) then you expect acceleration because the past has to infinite. Imagine something like an exponential curve y=e^x and you can get the idea.
Recent findings have shown that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. If this is the case it would indicate that the universe will not cycle but is destined for a cold and lonely end to all matter. Big Bang proponents cite the residual background radiation, centered at 160.4 GHz with an equivalent blackbody temperature of 2.7 degrees Kelvin, as an indicator of the Big Bang. How does your theory explain this background radiation and its origin? Is interstallar travel going to be for us?
im reading the comments.......WTF?
bmskulllz 3 months ago
@kaviilaugh For my web site, search harmonics theory
artynz 7 months ago
Can we found out what is the natural frequency of the aether ? Or there is not a single frequency?
freemanx2x 9 months ago
@freemanx2x IMO there is no single frequency of the aether. Frequencies come from the largest scale downwards. For a tensile medium there is no limit.
artynz 7 months ago
@freemanx2x Plase search for " The New Theory Of The Aether" and "Electrodynamic Wave Theory Physical Forces" both by T. J. J. See !
freemanx2x 7 months ago
I think if you extend the existence of waves into the fifth and sixth dimension, you will find that explaining quantum phenomena becomes easier.
Third, I am unclear as to how your theory explains interactions among particles; does your theory predict the existence of force particles? if so, how does it explain their functionality?
Fourth, how does your theory explain the expansion of the universe: if the structure of the universe aligns with harmonics, won't that alignment be lost in time?
Kevin4381 1 year ago
@Kevin4381 the full details of particle interactions remains to be solved. The idea is that spherical standing waves interact. Look for the work of Gabriel LaFreniere on matter is made of waves for some indications on possible particle interactions.
artynz 1 year ago
@Kevin4381 The question about loss of alignment is a very important one. In my view there are many waves from immensely large to incredibly small. Harmonics natural develop the smaller waves near the wave centres of large waves because the non-linearity is greater there, i.e., nucleons at centre of atoms, Sun at centre of solar system etc.
These larger waves are responsible for the deformations which cause the smaller waves points of convergence to move about.
artynz 1 year ago
@Kevin4381 The test for this is that motions at one level must correspond to cycles at the next level up. I have found that this does indeed happen. Solar system dynamics do relate to stellar wave sizes and so on.
artynz 1 year ago
@Kevin4381 (read the following posts from bottom up - limited posting size meant splitting comments into many parts)
artynz 1 year ago
I really found your videos fascinating. I do have a few questions:
First, can you explain some of the strange quantum phenomena such as entanglement using your theory?
Second, I think you might be able to improve your theory by exploring the possibility of harmonics in higher dimensions. I know you have so far disregarded higher dimensions, but I think this is a mistake: Time, for example, is clearly a 'dimension' of reality in which waves might exist and produce interesting effects ... (cont..)
Kevin4381 1 year ago
@Kevin4381 I agree that time is a dimension, and think that is sufficient along with the 3 spacial dimensions.
Entanglement is etc is really just confusion regarding sub-sample statistics. I have more on this in my talk that you will find if you search for: ray tomes cycles research FSMN WSM
artynz 1 year ago
WSM reminds me of the Spanda School of Trika Kashmir Shaivism. Spanda is an atemporal vibration, throb, pulse or quiver that creates everyting, both the objective exterior reality and the subjective world. Utimate movement takes place not in space or time but within Supreme Consciousness/Awareness *Cit* as a cycle of internalization and externalization of consciousness itself. This rhythmic contraction and expansion (visarga) is a contractive movement that results in a return to the origin.
MySocksSmell2 1 year ago
@MySocksSmell2 I received a message from someone viewing my video on human harmonics sating that they had seen the figure of 40 Hz for a consciousness cycle. That 40 Hz frequency is the 72nd harmonic of the human body and relates to acupuncture points, vertebrae, ribs and finger joints etc.
artynz 1 year ago
There rarely seems to be discussion about how the big bang theory came to be. It seems more of a brand name than anything else, perhaps to demonstrate an "understanding" of the universe beyond what the governments and funding organizations can grasp, so they say "we leave it in your hands", here is a 100 million dollars for research.
After I watched your video, the idea of waves in matter, and harmonics to explain the different properties of physics, MAKES SENSE, right off the bat. Thanks.
ricktbdgc 1 year ago
@ricktbdgc Yes, I find that explanation of everything in terms of waves is naturally appealing to people because it meshes with so many other areas of understanding.
artynz 1 year ago
This video makes me think of the creation theory of sacred geometry mixed with a little m-theory. I love it. Thank you for putting in all the time and effort to find this data :)
admandrsn1981 1 year ago
@admandrsn1981 Thanks for the kind comments.
artynz 1 year ago
I will be looking into your theory, this stuff is awesome. I'm still reserved as to how "some guy on YouTube" could have gotten the whole thing correct before all the physicists, but stranger things have happened.
In my private thoughts I've also imagined something very much like your theory. But I'm no physicist. Also, because I'm not at all familiar with the language of mathematics (I'm a programmer and visual thinker) I can't verify many of these things myself.
JuusoAlasuutari 1 year ago
@JuusoAlasuutari Thanks for the kind comments. Well, I didn't start out as "some guy on YouTube" because lots of this work happened before the internet. But we move with the times. I have been pleasantly surprised at the quality of the comments and questions in YouTube.
artynz 1 year ago
Thanks Ray! Can you please provide ideas about "what" got the jelly to start wobbling? Also, can you provide ideas on why static waves don't burn out. Thanks!
FlyingWig 1 year ago
@FlyingWig I always think that it started like the oiled up guy hitting in the gong in the start of the old Rank movies (we call this big bong theory) ;-)
In harmonics theory all waves are losing energy to harmonics and so getting weaker. Of course most waves are all receiving energy from sub-harmonics and so also getting stronger. But generally the shift is to higher frequencies. This means that low frequencies are doing something like exponential decay. Gravity is a result of this.
artynz 1 year ago
@artynz
Thank you for the reply!
FlyingWig 11 months ago
Unfortunately I know nothing about harmonics and therefore left it as something I could speculate upon it at a later time.
You have just confirmed everything I was thinking. In a few hours your theory made more sense than 3 years of studying quantum mechanics ever has...Everything I've been thinking...there actually may be something substantial to it?
Thank you!! You've opened a world of possibilities. I don't know what to do with myself... I have to study harmonics! But I need sleep first.
Votorx 1 year ago
@Votorx Hope that you slept well. Thanks for the kind comments.
artynz 1 year ago
Simply amazing... I think I'm in awe. I've only been studying contemporary physics for a few years and while I'm a novice I was disagreeing with a lot of what I was reading. For a number of reasons I began thinking of matter as purely a wave. I didn't how to describe it but it made more sense than to think of matter as a particle.
My studies also suggested there was some kind of link between music and the universe due to the patterns that I saw from the material I was learning from.
Votorx 1 year ago
wow you are the next einstein!
jorge616 1 year ago
Hi Ray, Great videos! Your work reminded me of the body's harmonics via the balanced chakra's, they each have a frequency and when all are balanced the body works at it's best. Your work also makes me think of the solfeggio harmonics
saucerfulofsecretsxx 2 years ago
@saucerfulofsecretsxx Did you see the harmonics of the human body video that I did --> chakras etc.?
artynz 1 year ago
maybee there is no universe and the only thing out there is data, and depending on what you use to perceive that data, it shows up however it does on that device, and that data has its averages like any data. and our whole lives are just interpreted data. and YOU are the only thing that exists, just you and data, and you are seeing us and all these things though your perception of it. haha no im just kidding. ...maybe. oooooooooh..... .... ... .. . .. ... .... ..... .... ... .. ...... .. ... ..
POOPSCAM666 2 years ago
I'm not sure I follow how you have to have an infinite universe as a conclusion of this idea, but since you do, I was wondering if there is an answer in this wave idea to Olbers' paradox? Just curious.
Lufo1138 2 years ago
Hi Lufo
I don't know whether the Universe is infinite or not.
But either way, Olber's paradox is not a problem. If the average energy density of the universe is finite at some point in time, then it can never become infinite at some time in the future (as OOLber's paradox assumes). Therefore there must be a mistake in the assumptions. That mistake is assuming that stars have infinite lives. They don't. The assumption is also made that energy absorbed by dust is recycled - maybe as new stars?
artynz 2 years ago
Hi Lufo, I accidentally deleted your next message which said:
Oh, I guess I got from part of this that you were saying the interpretation that the universe was expanding based on redshift is wrong. So if the universe is finite, but not expanding, what maintains its structure over such long periods?
artynz 2 years ago
The wave structure maintains the structure.
artynz 2 years ago
Hey, great string of videos, I was wondering you could show me some of the math that goes along with this discovery.
Tachyon1231 2 years ago
The maths was discovered by Maxwell nearly 150 years ago. But people did not recognize that matter fits those equations also. Actually a famous mathematician named Clifford did realize, but he died before he convinced people. Schroedinger's maths also is correct and he understood that is was not about probabilities but was real waves.
artynz 2 years ago
sooo... i understand the aether part of this... i think, but what your saying is because of the natural oscillations of the aether the universe naturally expands and contracts due to harmonics?
ses4life 2 years ago
Woa you might have actually found the pattern that connects everything. Awesome! So the vibrations create vibrations that create vibrations and so on, and then they create a pattern that manifests on every possible scale and level of excistence?
poopoop121212 2 years ago
Yes at every scale. And also, the waves of every type, being light, sound, and right on down to continental drift velocities.
artynz 2 years ago
I hope that as the Internet and other media make it easier to revisit our assumptions, we can reconstruct a different and more viable interpretation of the universe we live in, and thank you greatly for your contribution.
steadyStater137 2 years ago
Yes, the internet prevents the "establishment" from drowning out other views. Wonderful invention. Thanks for the kind remarks.
artynz 2 years ago
Some ten tests have been done successfully already. Several more can be done with existing data. Successful tests include:
* Predicting new particle of 68 times electron mass.
* Showing that 586 million year geological cycle matches 586 million light year galactic supercluster wall spacing if a certain value of Hubble constant is valid. Subsequent measures of Hubble constant do fit this.
Many more ...
artynz 2 years ago
now i find myself asking who was it first chose the the frequency of middle C?
cygnusfive 2 years ago
Usually the standard chosen is A rather than C. Today it is set to 440 Hz. However it has varied over time and most often been a little higher than that. "Concert pitch" is sometimes set at 450 Hz. IMO that is nearer to the "true" frequency which is related to the Earth natural Schumann frequency as follows. Theoretical Schumann frequency = 7.5 Hz. The chord F-A-C is ratios 24:30:36 times that giving 180:225:270 Hz. Or 450 Hz for A in the next octave.
artynz 2 years ago
To put this another way, the ultimate starting point is the 1st harmonic. IMO it is a cycle that is most likely 1.4x10^23 years long. That is a D, almost 110 octaves below middle C.
artynz 2 years ago
@artynz wouldn't 110 octaves bellow C still be C ?just an extremely low C?
RidgeJaggers 1 year ago
thank you thank you! can i make a dvd of these and give it to lots of people? im annoyed extremely by the fact that this is "obscure" information and looked at as "new age" crap. i want to do everything i can to spread it to everyone. when i have kids i dont want them going to school and learning all that other crap. i think this absolutely NEEDS to be common knowledge.
FROMOUTHERE 2 years ago
Yes, if you include the original videos in full, then I have no objection. Please also include the links and info from the description with each video if possible.
artynz 2 years ago
Dear Ray,
You have what I believe to be an excellent grasp of the case.
Yours sincerely,
Lucian Coulson.
P.S. The very quintessence.
LukeCoulson 2 years ago
Interesting, very interesting research field! Everything is cyclic in the cosmos, can't deny that and ancient people realized and observed this long time ago that everything is transient, dead is another beginning in the cycle of existence and non-existence. It is interesting what is it b/wn the cycles? What is the Ultimate Stuff of Reality beyond all transient universal realities, the Ultimate Vessel that potentiates this wave function?
Faaar lost into Realities ;] and sub-realities
prozrachno 2 years ago
Thanks. What does "b/wn" mean?
I consider the ultimate stuff to be a tensile aether. There are probably other equally valid alternatives.
artynz 2 years ago
b/wn = between, short version :) Do you also consider this "ultimate aether" to be in a state of Singularity? With endless informational-creative potential
prozrachno 2 years ago
I don't have any concept of between cycles. A cycle is like a circle - no beginning, no end.
Not sure whether you use singularity in physicists sense. Seems not. Maybe you mean it is somehow unified? I think there is just one physics, so yes.
It seems to me that more detail is continuously created.
artynz 2 years ago
Amazing work.
You've wrapped alot of paradoxs that have boggled my mind into a neat, simple and perfect system.
Having been interested in cymatics, music & sound, electronics, engineering and many contrasting systems I'd been long on the path of trying to find the tangible link between all of them through vibration,and you've essentially accomplished this, much respect.
Hopefully the academic world will begin to accept these ideas and dedicate more time into their practical developments.
TekkGnostic 3 years ago
Thank you for your kind comments. The academic world does not work that way as the early quantum physicists noted. It works by new people having new ideas and the odl ones gradually dieing off. :-)
artynz 2 years ago
This is all very, very interesting! Having seen all three parts, I can tell this is so much in line with my own thinking. It is in accordance with chaos theory and the diagram at 0:55 is spot on similar to the temperature curves of the ice ages the last million years!
Search "Milankovitch cycles". I will have to get back to you with more when I have watched more of your work. You might like to check out Neal Adam´s "Prime Matter" and "growing earth" theories, (Youtube videos) in the mean time.
trymil 3 years ago
I came across growing Earth ideas and investigated it using GPS measurements that are made all around the world. I found that there is slow growth of the Earth according to GPS. Search "earth expansion ray tomes".
artynz 2 years ago
Thank you very much. I think you are on the rigth track too. Are you aware that hindu scientist regard the Divine as an occilation and believe that the universe started with one sound called Om or AUM. They were incredibally accurate in estimating the age of the earth and universe. I wonder if they thought along the same lines as you. In India they had universities 2500 hundred years ago with 50 subjects and tens of thousands of students. Alas the west goes on ignoring their knowledge.
lasker341 3 years ago
Most religions include oscillations in the beginning. In Judaism and Christianity the phrases are In the beginning was the word, and let there be light.
Aum is interesting because the three parts a-u-m have many, moderate and few higher order harmonics.
artynz 2 years ago
Thank you for the very nice videos and I am adding them soon to my account in order to sprend the massage. Your are on the right track. I am a physicist and I would like to have a copy of the Book. If its possible. Thank you.
Subspace4d 3 years ago
Subspace4d - sorry, I missed your message before. I don't have a book as such. If you go to my profile, you will find links to my website and other related matters which will hopefully give you what you want. If not, send me a message.
artynz 2 years ago
would it be possible for us to create that which is hard to find then? I mean if harmonics create matter could we not build a device to manipulate harmonics to produce what ever element we need. I would be very interested to see more on this subject. Any suggested reading? I would like to see more about the actual equations. Good videos.
GJR100Frauenjager 3 years ago
Hi GJR100Frauenjager
Replying for 4th time - it seems that I cannot put links in a comment. See my main web site page on the maths of harmonics theory. See Milo Wolff's web site or his new book on the maths of WSM.
Making matter via electromagnetic waves is extremely tricky because the frequencies involved are greater than 10^23 Hz and effectively it is a nuclear explosion in reverse.
Regards
Ray
artynz 3 years ago
I admire your work.
borja001f 3 years ago
Thank you.
artynz 3 years ago
So were does the initial amplitude come from? ;)
6thCreated 3 years ago
Who can say? If we propose some God to make it all and give it a push, then we need to explain what made the God and made him do that. How can we possibly ever come to a satisfactory start with no more questions?
artynz 3 years ago
I actually have a theory on that I might post a video of my own.
6thCreated 3 years ago
Hello, I really appreciate what you're doing here. I'm interested on your thoughts about cycles, frequencies, and patterns pertaining to the galactic center and 2012. Some sort of consciousness shift into a higher frequency of perception maybe?
Keteil 3 years ago
Hi Keteil, I have never found any evidence that anything special is going to happen in 2012. Often the same people that mention this also claim that the Earth's Schumann resonance is increasing in frequency. This is simply not true. It fluctuates over the 11 year sunspot cycle as well as over an annual cycle, but there is no uptrend beyond that.
I think that the year 2012 is just the Mayan equivalent to the Christian year 2000 which was going to have many disasters that didn't in fact happen.
artynz 3 years ago
Thanks for your reply.
I've been thinking, the æther is like a quintessential unmitigated energy, isn't that similar to what mystics have said for thousands of years? Except they said it was one all pervading consciousness and our consciousness is like one drop in this vast ætheric ocean. But consciousness doesn't mean our thoughts and feelings and observations, that is like muddied consciousness that must be overcome to get to the source, pure unsoiled consciousness. . .(continued below). . .
Keteil 3 years ago
. . . I guess where I'm going with this is, what are your thoughts on the role of consciousness in all of this?
If you don't mind my asking.
Keteil 3 years ago
I think that the interpretation I have given of the aether has a lot in common with what mystics have said. I don't pretend to understand how consciousness arises in it - perhaps it is the other way around - matter and vibration arise in a consciousness. I don't know.
artynz 3 years ago
Excellent answer!!!!
zenlama 2 years ago
Above was in reference to your reply about consciousness. Came up in wrong spot. Anyway: Outstanding Work.
zenlama 2 years ago
thanks
artynz 2 years ago
First of all, thank you Artynz for posting your findings. Since I realised at my youth that everything is made of vibrating matter, I have seen it everywhere.
zzHalfTruthzz 3 years ago
Yes, once one understands that everything is vibration, many things are easier to understand.
artynz 3 years ago
Yes, prediction is the ultimate test of science. It is interesting that the second solar system discovered (around a pulsar) does show 3 planets at almost exactly half the distances of our systems first three planets from the Sun. This strongly supports the wave nature of planetary orbits.
Altogether I have made about 15 predictions with the theory and more than half of them have already been successfully confirmed. I will try to make more videos about these in the future.
Thanks.
artynz 3 years ago
what may be useful to help progress your views would to make predictions, for instance perhaps you could use your system to predict the types of planets that will be found around certian types of stars, something like this would make yours and others theories very dificult to ignore.
mtheoryrules 3 years ago
Hey ray I hope you keep posting vids I am enjoying what you have to say, it is very interesting. I think you and others like you are onto something very profound here.
mtheoryrules 3 years ago
...
Yes, base 12 shows the harmonic pattern more easily than base 10 because you just have to add a 0 many times. However there are still some ratios that don't fit base 12.
Will have to look up about Tesla's woodpecker beat.
artynz 4 years ago
Good questions GandalfDaBlack. Yes, looking at isotopes rather than elements is necessary because it is the mass of a nucleus that is important, because through E=m*c^2 and E=h*f mass is proportional to frequency of a nucleus. When that is done a harmonic pattern is found with the ratios of 2 and 3 and so on. It is clear that in this pattern nuclei of mass 7, 14, 28 and 56 are more abundant in the universe than other masses in their vicinity.
...
artynz 4 years ago
i dare say this also has something to do with the distance between primes. I was once playing with a Base-Prime counting system in excel (expressing all real integers as bitwise representations of prime numbers)
ie:
1 = 1
2 = 10
3 = 100
4 = 101
5 = 1000
6 = 1001
.. anyways, the pattern formed by counting in this manner seemed to remind me of one of your harmonic drawings.. but i'm sure you've already noticed this as well..
GandalfDaBlack 4 years ago 2
Yes, the strong harmonics are sort of the opposite extreme to the primes. Black vs White with the other numbers various shades of gray. So if one has a pattern of 12 so will the other.
artynz 4 years ago
This is great notice and it's because the binary system is the most simple and basic system. All numbering systems are harmonic, but since binary system is the most basic, it can show the basic pattern for all harmonics. And harmonics are related to prime numbers and Fibonacci pattern.
Saskachewan 3 years ago
there is an even more simple system called calculus of distinctions.
mtheoryrules 3 years ago
Dear Ray,
great series of videos here; I think you are definitely onto something with Harmonic Theory, as I too have been doing some personal research into the study of patterns.
I was wondering if you have tried re-modeling the periodic table of elements based on HT? Also, in the section where you mention the various rhythms of the universe; is this related to the "Woodpecker Beat" that Tesla spoke about?
Lastly, what are your thoughts on the metric system vs base-12?
regards,
h.
GandalfDaBlack 4 years ago 4
wow! why hasn't this man won a nobel prize yet?? amazing.
panterafan01 4 years ago 4
If there were something approximating a steady state (I think there is actually gradual change due to harmonic formation) then you expect acceleration because the past has to infinite. Imagine something like an exponential curve y=e^x and you can get the idea.
artynz 4 years ago
Recent findings have shown that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. If this is the case it would indicate that the universe will not cycle but is destined for a cold and lonely end to all matter. Big Bang proponents cite the residual background radiation, centered at 160.4 GHz with an equivalent blackbody temperature of 2.7 degrees Kelvin, as an indicator of the Big Bang. How does your theory explain this background radiation and its origin? Is interstallar travel going to be for us?
spacetimewarp 4 years ago
Thanks Geoff.
artynz 4 years ago
Hi ray,
Cycles are clearly important - they allow us to deduce things about the future!
And likewise the interconnection of all things in the universe is important.
In time this will lead to greater respect for Nature on earth
physics1philosophy 4 years ago