Iv'e read and listened to comments made by the musicians that were close to hendrix and it really makes you wunder but it was 40 yrs ago ,he's gone and probally anyone who was around at the time so it is what it is case closed his music lives on.
If JJ had any credible intelligence or grasp of this subject he would realize 1) the autopsy forensic data I cite IS from the autopsy sheets. He hasn't disproven that short of his moronic, evasive entry that "it is from books" (and therefore invalid). Nope, it isn't invalid - it's valid and he hasn't disproven that. 2) Therefore my arguments are also valid and he hasn't disproven them short of the trollish invalid trash he injects as his one and only response. JJ is now uncredible and ignorable.
@Exiles800 Is the pissing contest over yet. This is a MUSIC channel. Take your crap to the Sherlock Holmes,or Snoop and Blabber,or I will be a conspiracy legend for food, orI am Wile e. coyote super genius dogmatic asshole channel or the I like to bloviate channels.Go write a book get a tv show or eat razor blades. Your old enough so you could be a greeter at the local roosterama. So you are right ok,move along nothing more to see here. By the way Elvis is not dead
@mckeown101051 Trolls really hate the fact that Jimi was murdered and their usual stupidity doesn't cover their cowardly indifference. With cowards like this the offense is difficult defense of a victim who can't defend themselves, and righteousness is cowardly indifference, and therefore, by default, defense of the murderers. May those scum be VERY bothered by this and may it get to their consciouses and sit on their cowardly heads like MacBeth's dagger. May that be the music they hear...
I yu want to read a pretty good comprehensive look into Jimi's death go to Alex Constantines the covert war against rock, i will say anyone that had any knowlege about Jimi's death never made it to court they themselves are dead
Complaining that you got your facts from sensationalizing & fictionalized books IS IN FACT a VERY valid response. YOU answer this question-where did you get this information you regard as "fact" and "evidence"? Please answer that, come on, tell us you old sleuth. Tell us how you investigated this with the finest criminal minds and detectives you could find, how you left no stone unturned to discover the horrific truth, and how the feds now have you on their hit list for outing them.
Exile claims to be getting his "evidence" from the "autopsy data" and "relevant recordings" of the chemicals involved. Really. So you have actually SEEN the autopsy & chemical report YOURSELF...and NOT read about it in a book?You say yourself that you have drawn "relevant conclusions"..boy, you sure know how to sink your own ship, dim one.If there is moron here and someone in denial, that would be you.Until you get some SUBSTANTIATED facts you are just proving that you are just another nutcase
JJCane isn't too bright. If you read his posts all he can do is repeat over and over that I am getting my material from books. No, I am getting my material from the germane accurate autopsy data and relevant recordings of the chemicals involved. The relevant conclusions can be drawn from that valid information. JJ is obviously too dumb to relaize that or understand the arguments that ensue from that valid data base. These unfortunately are the dominating morons of the Hendrix world in denial.
Bands likes Zeppelin, Floyd, Doors, Hendrix give you chills? Are you physically attracted to music? I AM!
But If you think this is good well...Introducing my channel. IT attempts to open your mind up to a whole new world of musical truth. Don't forget to CHECK it OUT & subscribe IF U LIKE IT! <3muchlove
The British are some evil people. This "HairyChin" bugger poster says I should be banned for posting that Burdon helped cover-up Jimi's death. In my efforts to expose Jimi's murder I found that brits are the most vicious attackers of the murder evidence. Look, there's nothing stopping "Hairy" from listening to this video if he wants. Meanwhile Burdon knows something he's not telling. I think brits like "HairyChin" feel guilty about it and protest too much while their gov't lies about the facts
@Exiles800 What a bizarre response... But then, look at the source.
I do wonder how people like you manage to negotiate through life. How do you manage to function in a modern society with such twisted mental fixations. That's a rhetorical question BTW: I don't really care...
@BobTheMunificent I think most intelligent people would see that someone who says "fucking nutjob conspiracy theorists", who then can't back-up his accusations with any intelligent thought, who then publicy says he doesn't really care if Jimi was murdered or not, is a self-declared asshole who dismisses himself from the right to an opinion on this. This is for the big boys and serious people. You clueless trolls and selfish dumb-asses stupid enough to say "I don't care" should just shut-up.
@DaytonaGary Might want to check your facts since this video contains a tape of Jimi playing with War as witnessed by all those at the club that night.
@Exiles800 9months ago i came on here to listen to this song, and i see your still spreading your shit on here. Why don't you go right a book or something, you have so many facts on how Jimi died (in your opinion murdered) and they're all correct why don't just hand them over to the police or are they still corrupt. It's friggin nutters like you who should be banned from music sites, go join a forum and bore the bollocks of them with conspiracy shite and give us Hendrix lovers a break plz......
exiles800 also they had a ford slip off the line thaqt had a carb that helped it get 200 miles to the gallon but the cia stole the car because the oil co's paid them to work off the clock!!! man the man is holdin us down man and the cia had john lennon killed by jason borne(hinkley) and jodie foster's hot twat made em do it tooo man...
@ROMEORAUNCH False. The emergency room doctor who treated Jimi Hendrix came forward in 1992 to say he suctioned "bottles worth" of wine out of Hendrix's lungs and body and that instead of choking on his own vomit Jimi was drowned in red wine. If you bothered to study this all those who witnessed this were lying and the main witness, Monika Dannemann, was found dead in her Mercedes from car fumes right before announcing she was going to reveal what really happened. Jimi was murdered.
@Exiles800 thanks for that info,i did not know that ,but i still say it was drugs that led him to that point.,,btw,i am not against drugs shrooms are my choice.
Long time Hendrix fan here. This is the first I've heard of any argument he was murdered, I have an open mind but I cant see the motivation. Why would it be covered up also? Not like he could really damage anyone capable of such an act imo, so why would anyone want him dead?
@Lizardking270 His manager killed him. It's documented in a book by one of his lesser manager's book. It's the oldest motive in the book: life insurance.
@Lizardking270 You have to look deeper to understand the real motives. Jimi was on the worst list of threats to the US gov't on the FBI's "Security Index". His manager Michael Jeffery was British Intel MI-6 and mafia-connected. The offshore Bahamian banks Jeffery was putting the money he stole from Jimi in were the CIA's most sensitive cold war anti-communist secret black ops accounts banks. Jimi was sending lawyers to find out where his $ went. 11 hours after firing Jeffery Jimi was dead.
What most people don't know is CIA was running wild in the Caribbean at that time and had a secret agreement with the mob to look the other way if the mob would stop another Castro. The mob kicked-back millions for this gov't 'protection' that CIA then put in those Bahamian banks to use for wicked Cold War black ops. Most likely intel involuntarily drafted Jeffery into this program and stole Jimi's $ through Jeffery. When Jimi threatened to expose them he was killed strictly CIA-style.
Some people don't have anything better to do with their time except to try and be recognized, glad this wasn't MY blog..... ps... thank you for the post i really appreciated the post
Jimi was murdered. So was Bruce Lee. Elvis is alive, Jim Morrison is alive, Tupac is alive. 911 was a conspiracy. Anthony Weiner was set up. Its all being engineered by the Illuminati.
@MrSilvestris What I've learned about Jimi's murder and the evidence for it is that every time someone tries to challenge it they end up failing like MrSilvestris does above. MrSilvestris is a coward looking to justify his cowardly indifference. What motivates him and leads him to attack those who care about Jimi and defend him is a common factor many Hendrix fans have - that is, that they don't give a fuck about Jimi and just want to enjoy his music while letting him hang. He says nothing.
@MrSilvestris Only ignorant assholes don't fathom the moral question of allowing governments and media to cover-up political assassinations. Your content is idiotic/cowardly compared to the issues at hand. Allowing somebody's murder to go unaddressed is not noble it's cowardly. Especially Jimi Hendrix's. Boy are you dumb.
@JimmyPage97 You get him to take the strongest sleeping pills on the market unknowingly. Jeffery was MI-6 trained. Both the super-strong pills and waterboarding murder are straight out of intel's playbook and tells you who did it right there alone. It is a classic covert form of murder because it appears as a drug overdose and leaves no marks on the body. Jimi's autopsy showed a knock-out barbiturate blood level, therefore he was passed-out when the bottles of wine were poured into him.
@JimmyPage97 Without any follow-through to support it. If you follow the forensics Jimi had a 3.9mg blood barbiturate level. That means he was passed-out. He couldn't have had the wine in him that long because his blood alcohol content was only 5mg/100ml. You can't have enough wine in you "to sink a large boat" and still only have a 5mg/100ml b.a.c.. If he drank the wine before he passed-out then he would have registered higher. If you disagree do so by means of forensic argument.
@JimmyPage97 Henderson: 'Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky' ; Tony Brown: 'Hendrix The Final Days' ; Sharon Lawrence: 'Jimi Hendrix - The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend'. And numerous other books including Shapiro: 'Electric Gypsy' ; Dannemann: 'Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix' ; McDermott: 'Setting The Record Straight' ; Etchingham: 'Through Gypsy Eyes' and numerous web based sources too numerous to list. Trust me, Jimi was murdered just as Wright claimed while passed-out on barbiturate
@Exiles800 Don't know those books, and don't really have access to that information. What are the numerous web based sources too numerous to list? These I imagine I could access.
on a TOTALLY different standard: Why should I trust you?
@JimmyPage97 Google around on "Jimi Hendrix Murdered" and you'll find most of it. Read about Kathy Etchingham's petition and Fairchild's articles back in the early 1990's. You can trust me because I'm a serious Hendrix fan who gets the creeps with the level of cowardice being shown by his so-called fans elsewhere. But the first thing I would say to you is don't trust me - trust the information and facts. You'll see they are there and the authorities are desperately trying to avoid them.
@Exiles800 I consider myself a serious Hendrix fan. What is the cowardice being shown by Hendrix's so-called fans? The first thing you said to me was actually the opposite of don't trust me. My lack of trust isn't in the facts, its in an argument which questions the validity of the facts provided in the information. What I see is conspiracy, weather its wrong or right lays in the hands of validity.
@JimmyPage97 They aren't interested in Jimi's murder just collecting his music. You'll find the evidence valid if you study those facts. Try to get a copy of Brown's 'Final Days' and you'll see he was narrowing down the focus. There are people alive today who know what happened like Burdon and the road crew members.
I've done extensive research myself. Jimi had many problems & decided to quit playing, but his love of the spotlight brought him back to perform. He faked his death and went on to star as Weezy on the Jeffersons' . Sadly food became his drug of choice and after a short gig as Rerun on What's Happening he needed a break. He bought a house on the big island, working out both mind & body-reading, meditating, yoga, lots of LSD, & today Jimi is the President of the mighty US of A.-now ya know
@fritzmerde Jimi Hendrix's murder is a serious matter. It takes a pretty sick puppy to troll it. I hope you draw serious karma on yourself for doing that. "Fritzmerde" sounds like a troll handle.
I use logic, when evaluating these claims. Do we believe a roadie (White), who wrote a book (2009) about a conversation (1971) with a guy (Jeffery) who is conveniently too dead to respond (plane crash 1973), wherein, he claimed he murdered Hendrix? Or do we believe experienced detectives and coroners, who notice small details in a high profile cases? How often do 1st time killers fool guys, who've seen hundreds of murder scenes? Lacking experience, amateurs miss details. Pros have seen it all
@skybluemarshall The British inspector who originally interviewed all the witnesses back in 1970 came back and said "I thought they were all lying". Your statement is just sophist talk devoid of any content. You're ignorant of the evidence.
@Exiles800 Just because they lied about what happened, it doesn't mean they murdered him. Have you ever personally known anyone, who died from a drug overdose? I knew 3 people very well, including my step brother. People do some very dumb things, in misguided efforts to keep their friends awake and out of jail, instead just calling for help. They tie them to chairs, walk them around for hours, try to induce vomiting, give them coffee. They basically play doctor. Do you think they tell the cops?
@skybluemarshall If you examine what you say it is all theoretical and separate from the actual facts of Jimi's Hendrix's death. Your input is too general and disconnected from the direct facts of this case. If you had a working knowledge of the evidence you would realize all the clues point towards murder. The most damning clue is the actual medical forensic evidence that showed Jimi had too much wine in his body to have the negligible blood alcohol content he had. When you analyze the facts
of this case - which you haven't done - you'll see right away that the real times involved didn't give Jimi enough time to die accidentally. He wasn't in the Samarkand long enough to overdose on Vesparax and choke on his vomit. The real timeframe involved necessitates Monika being awake. The Samarkand was small so it would be impossible for Monika to not notice. You have to explain to me why Monika would leave Jimi untouched covered in vomit without trying to help him? She knew he was murdered
Jimi's body was found on the bed fully clothed with what the ambulance men said was a "grotesque" amount of vomit covering him from his shoulders up. This was the body's violent reaction to being drowned in wine. His blood barbiturate was at a knock-out level. This means he was passed-out and couldn't have drank the many bottles of wine witnessed in his lungs by Dr Bannister while he was still conscious. And he couldn't have drank the wine earlier because it would have registered in his blood.
@Exiles800 I don't claim to know all the facts. But, I was heavily involved in the drug counterculture in the 70s. I have personally witnessed several drug overdoses. And I am telling you, not everyone present for a drug overdose, responds safely and properly. Especially during an era, when everyone present, including the victim, could've face years in prison, just for a small pot possession, charge. Panic, creates extreme danger for the victims and the helpers often do REALLY stupid sh*t!
When we wake up to the truth of life, inspired music like this will emerge and flourish again. Search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the truth
The truth? Hendrix is still alive and playing in a little band in Spokane Washington. He got tired of being ripped off and dealing with lawyers, so he asked his good friend Freddy Taylor to sub for him on the last tour as they resembled each other and Freddy also played left handed guitar. Jimi taught him the style and songs...but Freddy got caught up in the partying and it finally got him that fateful night. Freddy was nearly as good as Jimi in the end...of course- he had a great teacher!
@JJCANE2 That's just tard-talk for people who can't deal with the real evidence. Jimi Hendrix's murder is a serious thing. May clowns who troll it place themselves in the clown pit they belong in. Serious Hendrix fans appreciate the evidence for Jimi's murder. Non-serious ones don't.
...and sometimes "Tard" talk is all about seeing conspiracys every where you look. I consider myself a serious Hendrix fan. But reading what I have about him, I see no reason in the world to believe someone would have murdered him, much less with his own vomit. The truth may not be easy or fun to accept, but sometimes bad things happen that really are NOT due to a conspiracy...it's real life.
@JJCANE2 You're just offering a worthless uneducated opinion. Hints of foul play are roughly seen in Tony Brown's book 'Final Days' and loosely pointed at in Henderson's 'Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky'. You're obviously just a shallow person whose best offering is "reading what I've read about him etc" Sorry, that's not good enough and you have to show you have credible understanding of the forensic evidence and other key clues like Jeffery's motives. You're just offering trolling denial.
If you were really a serious Hendrix fan you would realize Jeffery staged a fake kidnapping of Jimi and put him on the phone while still strapped into a chair and told him "There are some very powerful people who depend on me being your manager and if you fire me you will be killed." Jimi fired Jeffery 10 hours before he was killed by a method only intel practices. Alcohol/barbiturate overdoses were a classic covert murder method. Jimi was tracing his $ to some serious CIA Bahamian banks.
The trouble with the so-called "Hendrix Community" is there are people who have very superficial knowledge of Jimi through some biographies who don't mind trolling the serious issue of Jimi's murder even though it's obvious they don't have any real knowledge of the evidence behind it. They don't do any intelligent study of the forensics nor are they capable of comprehending the circumstantial evidence that points towards murder. Yet that doesn't stop them from making casual uncredible denials.
My "worthless and uneducated opinion" sounds a bit more believable than your conspiracy laden idea that people were out to kill a rock star. If you base your opinion on what you read in a book intended to stir controversy (and hence sell more copies) what do you expect?
Don't say others opinions are "Trolling denial" when yours is "Trolling acceptance" which by the way, makes your opinion equally -is not more so- worthless.You take everything in this book as gospel without question. Shallow.
Anyone can see what you write is just overly-general off-the-cuff remarks not based on the true facts of this case. Yet that doesn't stop you from posing yourself as having the better opinion. Typical of murder deniers your input is just self-rationalizing rubbish. If you examine the content of your entries they don't contain any of the relevant facts or evidence. As your post shows, there's a universal common thread amongst murder deniers, that is, they can't and won't discuss the evidence.
unless you are a police officer, forensic investigator or detective who has actually WORKED on the case, you are basing your information on heresay, from a book designed to create controversy and sell copies. Where are your TRUE Facts and Evidence?
Your opinion is jumping the gun.To come to a true conclusion, talk to the people who have DIRECTLY investigated the case, the D.A, etc and get VERIFIED evidence. Otherwise, your opinion is exactly what you accuse me of-self-rationalizing rubbish
You live in very child-like fantasy if you simply refer to official authorities at their word as if there were never any scandals or conflicts of interests existing in history. You destroy your own credibility right there alone. The problem with what you write is you refer to something that doesn't exist. If you had any credible knowledge of this case you would realize that there never was any official investigation of the evidence. The Inquest never bothered to determine basic time of death.
The Inquest was a farce that simply mulled over suicide and then created an "open verdict". It took Monika Dannemann's story without question and used it to determine its legal and forensic conclusions. You deniers put on a good bluff but when asked to defend your own position you can't do it and troll with "conspiracy theory" mockery. Go ahead explain to me how much credibility you and your official sources have with Monika's story? Britain has never explained itself vs Monika's proven lies.
Deniers give themselves away because they use the invalid logical device that people are just trying to sell books as an excuse to ignore the evidence. Some of the main evidence came from the authorities themselves like Dr Bannister and Dr Crompton. Your advice to only honor the "verified" evidence of Scotland Yard is laughable since SY has a direct conflict of interest with its incompetent handling of the case. Meanwhile what is "verified" here is Monika's lies that you deniers then ignore.
What Scotland Yard and deniers are trying to get away with is shutting this off at the shallow level before we can discuss the real evidence. Scotland Yard took Etchingham's petition and said there was nothing in it that differed from the original investigation. That was a criminal lie Scotland Yard used to evade the truth. We already know Monika's story was disproven by Burdon's admission, the attendants, and the phone records. Therefore the original investigation is disproven. They lied.
If you are referring to "verified" authorities you should recognize the words of the British inspector who questioned the witnesses. He came back and said he thought they were all lying. In an honest investigation this would normally spur further inquiry however in Hendrix's case this resulted in the opposite. And we haven't even touched the medical forensic evidence from the autopsy that precludes any accidental death, let alone Jeffery's threats to Jimi and his motives and intel background.
I'd say it is you who is living in a fantasy. Mainly because you take something like a book (that is sold for profit by the way)and don't question it's accuracy- or motives. You assume it is 100% correct without bothering to do the leg work to confirm any of what it claims. I am quite sure that the D.A., the police deptartment and the coroners office would have some records for you to see FOR YOURSELF.If you are so concerned about a cover up. Get the evidence ..before you scream cover-up.
@JJCANE2 I think people have seen your best JJ. By the way, which 'book' are you referring to? Rock Roadie? I haven't even read it. The information I speak of comes from the independent evidence and ALL known sources for the information involving Jimi's death. I think you have it backwards. I have done the legwork. It is you who thinks mocking and accusing people of trying to sell books is good enough to deny the evidence. You obviously have zero knowledge of this yet speak down as if you did.
JJ: I think you fail to see you have it backwards and the ball is now in your court. You can't ignore the fact that the "verified" and official verdict was based directly on Monika's proven lies. Dr Teare took the 11:45am time of death given in Monika's story and used it to determine autopsy calculations. That data was provenly false and Jimi was dead as early as 5:15 and probably even earlier than that. So unless you can answer how you justify Monika's story you offer uncredible empty argument.
You haven't proven a thing. Is this your best? Quoting from books is your idea of legwork? Why not investigate Area 51, there are lots of books on that subject, and apparent evidence there. Also,I'm not even remotely close to giving my best. If you had evidence that you have seen and documented YOURSELF then we'd be on a different plateau. You are regurgitating what you have read and assuming it is all fact with no proper investigation on your part first. Your opinion then is based on heresay.
That's just blather JJ. Any smart person who has studied this case would see it. You troll area 51 mockery too quickly vs the real evidence of this case that you obviously have no understanding of. You pretend an authoritative position however any fool could see you refuse to answer the basic point about Monika's story and how it reflects on the official verdict. All you have is your denial deflections and obviously have no basic understanding of operative evidence involved. Like all deniers
you can't directly discuss the very real evidence of Monika's lies; Burdon's admission and how it reflects on what happened; how the forensic evidence proves murder; how the state of Jimi's body proves he was dead early-on when Monika first reacted; how the blood alcohol content conflicts with the "bottles worth" of wine Dr Bannister witnessed flooding Jimi's lungs; Jeffery's threats to kill Jimi and how they relate to Jimi dying 10 hours after he fired him; not to mention Monika's death.
I think most people could see the fakery of someone who says "I haven't even shown my best" when they still haven't answered the basic question of Monika's lies. It's clear the 'best' this person has is saying "regurgitating from books" while not noticing I've created forensic arguments not seen in any books. Any honest look at the evidence would show that Jeffery's crew and Burdon all knew about the Samarkand and that it was probably a trap. They also knew Jimi was murdered when they arrived.
I HAVE very much proven something. I've proven you contemptuously can't answer a basic point. You can't answer how Monika's proven lies reflect on the official verdict. All you have is empty talk vs the real facts of this case. Go ahead, it's your turn now. Answer directly how the official Inquest could be valid when it is based on Monika's already proven lies? Answer this point directly or surrender your credibility:
Exile, you are mentioning "Real evidence".. uh, the evidence you have READ about. Has it EVER been confirmed by the proper authorities? Even in a conspiracy, SOMEONE usually cracks- and not EVERYONE is involved with it. Have YOU talked to Monika? Have you seen ANY evidence at all?Oh, no...you're relying on someone elses word that everything you read in their book is true. Yup, must be. It's in a book after all. That's why I believe in the Tooth Fairy. He not only has a book, but a movie too.
@JJCANE2 OK, most people could see you're a non-serious troll by now. I've done my job, thanks. As long as you can't answer the point about Monika's story and how it affects the official verdict you're done and have dismissed yourself from being taken seriously. What you are seeing here with JJ is what happens 100% of the time when these mocking murder deniers are confronted with the real facts and arguments. And the reason for that is because Jimi was murdered. JJ marches naked unaffected.
Ludicrous. You buy into everything you read without question. I have learned that you accept NOTHING in this world without proof. You are living in a fantasy world where you put near biblical faith in someone elses writings. I suggest you actually substantiate the FACTS for yourself before you accept everything you read as gospel. It is you who needs to defend his position as a conspiracy monger not I, a mere skeptic.If you cannot SUBSTANTIATE evidence, it is YOU who is doing the Trolling, not I
@JJCANE2 You didn't answer the point about Monika's proven lies and how they affect the evidence? You're done. Thank you. The more you loudly protest and squirm without being able to answer basic direct facts about the evidence the harder you prove what I'm saying. Either answer the point about Monika's lies or fuck off and assume the troll status you obviously display.
Ha ha...Please tell me that there is more to this so called "convincing" and "unquestionable" evidence you know for certain other than what someone can pick up at a book store. No my friend, it is you who has absolutely no credibility here. Either explain how you can prove this evidence as real or concrete-the "legwork" you claim to have done- or start investigating the Elvis sightings in Idaho.You come off as a self-righteous buffoon whose sole "evidence" is just opinion. Fuck off yourself.
@JJCANE2 As long as you continue to show publicly that you are incapable of dealing with the evidence itself directly you are making my case for me. You can't get away with ignoring the significance of Monika's story being proven to be complete lies and how it relates to the evidence. I think you're deluding yourself that anyone reading this can't see that you're just a dumb-ass arrogant troll who thinks he is exempt from normal discussion and can deal with this by means of retarded defiant talk
It's clear to anyone that you're clueless and the best you can offer is "anyone can get this from books" and Elvis trolling. The reason JJ's posts haven't changed since his first entry is he is stuck at the defiant trolling level of superficial dumb-talk he started with because that's all he has. JJ shares the fate of every single person who has challenged this. When argued well, you can see these people can't touch the facts and all end up exposing themselves as the denier trolls they are.
The reason deniers won't answer the point is because they're completely clueless of the evidence and can't. Once you understand that the official British Inquest took Monika's story straight and unquestioned and used it to determine its verdict you understand that the official verdict was based on lies and is therefore invalid. To have a credible opinion you have to be able to seriously and respectfully acknowledge and discuss this. Since JJ can't he therefore dismisses himself from credibility.
Proven lies,"unquestioned" evidence.You know all this again- FROM BOOKS YOU BUY AT BARNES & NOBLE. No, I am NOT the delusional one here. You keep evading the question of explaining what "legwork" you've done to CORROBORATE this "evidence". Monika's story, the cover-up, lies, etc.you read about.in a book. Real nice legwork there. You are the one exempting himself from normal conversation. I ask for REAL proof, you have none, proving you are delusional, a fool, and lack all credibility. Next.
@JJCANE2 You are obviously too uneducated on the topic to realize the evidence you are saying "comes from books" is the same evidence that is available out there in reality. You work under the moronic premise that since information comes from books that it is therefore automatically dismissable. That's stupid and proven in the fact that you can't discuss the single incident of Monika's lies. You're a dumb self-approving troll who's only simple device is saying things came from books. Stupid.
Ha, that gave me QUITE a chuckle.You say because it's from a book I automatically dismiss it. Well, my simian friend, you read a book and automatically take it as Gospel. I don't automatically "dismiss" or believe anything without authentication.The problem here is that YOU do.When you try to defend your beliefs based on books that are meant to sensationalize and create controversy, you have nothing to back it up. Give it up until you can get your knuckles off the floor and do some real legwork.
@Exiles800 You are not making a case for yourself at all. Like many poor debaters. You have resorted to name calling. When people start name calling, they lose all credibility with me. The message is, "My technique is weak, therefore I will attack you personally, because I have been unable, so, far to convince you." Attacking the opponent's intelligence, is the go to, move for most bad debaters. The argument is, "I can't convince you, because you are stupid." No, you just aren't very convincing.
@skybluemarshall You people are delusional because if you look at what you write it contains absolutely zero content as far as the incriminating facts of this case. People are smart enough to see others who think of any weak excuse they can to ignore the evidence. If you look at the entries of you deniers they just contain talk and nothing else. The entryway to credibility here is being able to discuss Monika's lies. Until you can do that directly YOU are the ones who don't have any credibility.
You can ignore or seek excuses around the facts any way you wish. I'm not anxiously awaiting approval from people who refuse to acknowledge the obvious. If we honestly discussed Monika's lies we would find that the Inquest used them to make its calculations and official verdict. Monika's story was proven to be full of lies, therefore the official verdict is invalid. Not only that if you look into the reasons why Monika made up such a bold story it traces back to her needing to cover up murder.
SkyBlue is a typical Hendrix murder denier. His main approach is to attempt to dismiss the evidence with a way too overly general discussion of typical overdose deaths. That isn't valid. A valid approach would look at the actual facts of the case and what they show. That includes a scientific analysis of the forensics and detective-like scrutiny of the circumstantial evidence and actions of the witnesses. That was never done by the authorities. SkyBlue is ducking out because he's clueless.
Until -and unless -you can verify ANY of your so-called "FACTS", you are simply a believer of whatever the Enquirer and the World News wants to tell you. You are an idiot since you do not question ANY of this evidence and take the PRINTED word and opinion of someone you don't even know as gospel. Spare me the condescending attitude that I'm stupid because I don't believe everything in print. Use it on yourself and grow up. Newsflash: There was a conspiracy.. to create a conspiracy. Now you know.
@JJCANE2 If you read the body of what I've written it's kind of clear that I offer cogent analysis of the established facts of the case and you offer the verbal rubbish above and that's all. I've done serious research on this. You obviously haven't. I think people can see that. I feel safe. You might like to know that in my efforts I've located a tape where Chas Chandler says on a British talk show: "Anybody who speaks of the real way Jimi died will have his head blown-off".
Well, if you have located such a tape, why not post it here for all to see? As far as this being a conspiracy I am open minded to any possibility. But it would take clear and convincing proof to persuade me of that, not merely someones word or an opinion of unverified facts and rumors. Chas Chandler publicly stating that news in the the proper context would be a step in the right direction. I urge you to post it in it's entirety-otherwise it is just another baseless, unverified, unproven rumor.
@JJCANE2 You can see the ridiculing troll back off his moronic, content-less input. Your stupid "I only depend on verified sources" rap is the obvious verbal rubbish that it is vs the real arguments I've presented that you can't answer. You're not worth answering and frankly I don't give a fuck what a stupid troll like you thinks. Sorry. I'm not waiting for your approval since you've already proven to be a scummy person in contempt of the facts. We are locating the tape. BBC is trying to bury it
Well, thank you for proving to me what I had suspected all along- what an ignorant, uninformed and self delusional moron you really are. You have no interest in other opinions or facts, only your own. And that speaks volumes about your credibility-as in you have absolutely NONE. It's obvious you cannot produce this so-called tape. Why not read some more books about the tape Mr Investigator, and then write about the evidence you have found-in A BOOK. What a complete ASS you proved you are.
@JJCANE2 We've seen the best you can offer and all it is is this shit here. So if you are questioning content, question your own. I can make valid forensic arguments you can't answer. I think everyone on this board can see all that you can offer. You can't answer my forensic arguments, which is obviously the reason you offer the shit you do. All you have the is self-exposing stupid trash talk above. You wouldn't tell me to write a book unless you thought there was something valid to write.
Yes you MUST have SOMETHING valid to write... SOMETHING...ANYTHING. No, I guess not. "Forensic arguments"-that's a laugh. Have YOU seen the forensic report in Jimi's death? I mean, in person? Not...you..know...IN A BOOK. No, I didn't think so. Did you get ANY evidence from any source other than these great books you read? No,didn't think so. Do you believe everything you read-without question? Why, we have a yes. If you get some REAL evidence, maybe I'll take you seriously, not as a clown.
@JJ I think you are under the delusion that the shit you offer is a valid response. My forensic argument is that the wine witnessed by Dr Bannister does not correspond with the blood alcohol content and is proof of murder in and of itself since no innocent explanation can be given for it. But a more complex forensic examination would show that the predictable absorption rates of Vesparax preclude the wine entering Jimi while he was conscious. Unless you can answer this directly you lose.
I think YOU are under the delusion that the SHIT you offer is valid. Let me guess...you have NEVER seen the autopsy report yourself have you? But, you "read" about it. The theories of wine content etc etc are what you have READ about. Have you done one thing-ANYTHING- to justify your beliefs other than to turn a page in a book? If you have, then you should DETAIL that here. Lets hear about your great crime investigation skills.
Otherwise you remain as always, a fanatical, deluded blowhard.
@JJCANE2 You're in contemptuous denial and think your obvious evasions are in control here. They're not. You offer a huge percentage of complete verbal shit but say very little and conspicuously fail to answer the points. People can see my skills have made you unable to honestly answer basic information. All you can do is babble "books" over and over. Dr Bannister clearly spoke of witnessing lungs full of wine. You're in contemptuous denial of that because you dishonestly don't want to admit it.
The reason your obvious evasions are stupid is because I have seen enough of the valid relevant chemical data from the autopsy to make valid arguments. You, in the meantime, are too dumb and in contempt to realize that that information is accurate and valid and you have failed to answer it. Your input is moronic and any intelligent person who read this "debate" would see you don't offer even the first respect for the evidence and therefore aren't credible. Assholes like you keep Jimi murdered.
I offer verbal shit? That's a laugh. You are the one claiming all these "facts" that you cannot back up. I am merely saying I would like to see the PROOF, which you consistently CANNOT provide. You claim everything you utter is a "proven" fact...yet all you have done is recite what you have read in a few books that propose a cover-up. Wow. That's real convincing. Why don't you answer the question I keep asking-have you done ANYTHING to investigate this book evidence? Nope, didn't think so. Lame.
More verbal shit - which is all you can offer. Like I said Dr Bannister's witnessing of the wine is critical forensic evidence that you don't seem to be able to coherently address short of repeating the same old empty shit you offer above. If you had any respect for the evidence you would see that the lungs full of wine Dr Bannister witnessed medically conflicted with the 5mg/100ml blood alcohol level. You might think complaining I got this from books is a valid answer, but it isn't. Answer it
Of course, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING will result from this sick and twisted crusade by the conspiracy geeks. Absolutely nothing. They re-opened the investigation in the nineties, found nothing new, closed the case again. But no, the geeks know better than the experts! They are ALL IN ON IT! From Richard Nixon all the way down to the crime scene cleanup crew! No amount of reason will suffice for these losers. The evidence is as plain as the giant "L" on the geek's foreheads. Move on. Nothing to see here
@jimistreets Welp, looks like topic has attracted the goofballs trolls like Jimistreets. Smart people will see Streets can't discuss this in any intelligent way. He's a retard who doesn't question conflicts of interests and automatically trusts the authorities in everything they do - even though the reasons why they should be questioned have been spelled-out numerous times. Streets' reaction to the real evidence is to trash-talk it with flames and ignore it. He's incapable of any real discussion
Damn! Exiles is here too? This guy is so full of BS and ever-changing stories, which I have answered over and over again. He keep changing his "facts" each time they get shot down, then he is left with nothing but name-calling. The sad truth of Jimi's death is that it was a tragic combination of actions, mainly by Jimi, and inaction, by Monika the Psycho and Eric the Bonehead.
The facts as stated by Exiles800 are correct.He has effectively encapsulated the work of Hendrix Researchers before him into a presentation that will prove itself to be invaluable in producing justice in this matter.The verbal obfuscation I encountered when confronting Mr Gleebek on this issue during a live worldwide broadcast in 2010 is apparently a preview for a forthcoming compendium of denial from various sources.The forensics cannot be denied.
@Cordmichael Sorry, but exiles and "facts" are oxymorons. Forensics, eyewitnesses, medical examiners, friends, and common sense explain Jimi's death as a tragic accident. There will be no "unveiling" of anything but another rehash of tired old fantasies dreamed up by wanna-be whistle-blowers with nothing really to blow their whistles about. There is no "justice" to be had in this matter. You guys really ought to just let Jimi rest in peace. Damn. By the way, Jimi's family despise you guys.
@jimistreets When you ask this clown "Jimistreets" to discuss the forensics, witnesses, and facts he keeps quoting he can't do it. I hope people are smart enough to ignore him and take him as the fool he is. Anyone can see the desperation he keeps resorting to to try to get around what he obviously can't answer. We have cogent evidence, Jimistreets just has ever-growing, self-exposing empty-content denial bluster. As much as he tries he can't make the real facts go away. He's a fool.
Y'all are ignoring the more important issues-they faked the f'n moon landing! Jimi wrote "Isabella" because he knew the truth. The moon mens queen, Isabella, was to reveal the truth to all Earthlings, then we nuked the far side of the moon where they live. Goddamit, now the Venusians and of course the Murcurians are pissed.We're all gonna be transported to Pudbit, a hidden moon orbiting Uranus and suffer as slaves to the intergalactic tribunal of justice, otherwise known as the CIA.
@JJCANE2 Right on Dude! Damn, people have to wake up to what is REALLY going on! Michael Jeffrey was the shooter on the Grassy Knoll! Jimi was murdered because he overheard Jeffrey talking to Chas Chandler about the WTC demolition plot! Richard Nixon wanted Jimi dead because Jimi was about to start a revolution of "Lil' bit of love, understanding, and SOOOUUUNDDZZZ"! The CIA invented a brand new form of killing called "Alcoholic Waterboarding" and haven't used it since!
@JJCANE2 Not only that, but sources say that the WWF wanted Jimi dead because he was about to go public that professional wrestling is fake! Here is the most devious part of this whole story - I just might die for saying this - but Jimi was murdered by a covert CIA hitman - code name "Exiles800" - in order for Exiles and all of his buddies to have something to whine about, make themselves feel important, give their sorry lives meaning, all because of their small penises!
At a time when all the players involved were stoned out of their minds and police & medical forensics were amateur compared to today, it is useless trying to go back and sort it all out. And even if you could, it accomplishes nothing in the end because it can't bring Jimi back.
@jonsilence F- You. You're just a coward. You're just a coward willing to let Jimi flap in the wind. All you are doing is fighting for Jimi's murderers over Jimi. What really gets to me is creeps like this guy who aren't bothered by hearing an evil media repeat over and over that Jimi died of an overdose in order to serve the governments that killed him.
Panhead says "conspiracy theorists are a dime a dozen" but that's all he says. Real Hendrix fans know Jimi was murdered and can show the proof. Other so-called "Hendrix fans" mock those who try to do justice for Jimi because they are people who lack the character needed to see it and understand why it's important. Jimi doesn't need fans like that. Meanwhile panhead wouldn't do very well in a discussion of the actual evidence, which shows who the real fans are and who the mocking clowns are.
@Exiles800 Hendrix indeed was murdered.. The circumstances surrounding his death were very suspicious.He, form what I understand was under the management of some english promotor Named Michael Jeffery was woth more dead than alive. He was forced to take barbituates, followed by red wine and basically in this overdosed state, choked on his own vomit. It is very sickening to me what some people will DO for money.If it's any consolation Micheal Jeffery himself died later on...
@gblueslover2 You've cut a forensic corner there because Hendrix could not have had pills shoved down his throat followed by wine because he would have died within minutes and not had the levels of barbiturate that were found in his blood at the autopsy. He was probably told the pills were weaker Tuinols and took his usual dose to compensate for his tolerance. He told Monika he thought Devon had OD'ed him. He didn't realize it was the Vesparax hitting him like a hammer. CIA black op murder.
@Exiles800 I'm more concerned about the circumstances and the "why" than anything else. There's absolutely no doubt in my mind Hendrix was murdered. I understand the notion of selfish people killing and think it's very very sick. I think his family should seek his body to be exhumed, if there's any possiblity to get a glimmer of new hope of who exactly in the CIA, if at all was involved. Just like J. Edgar Hoover, clandestinely targeting blacks, and supposed american communists, yet he was GAY..
@gblueslover2 They don't need to exhume the body. The original autopsy locked-in evidence that backs Dr Bannister's account. That's why Scotland Yard lied and said their look into it showed there was nothing different than the original Inquest. That's a horrible lie. Just the fact alone that Monika's story has been disproven shows what a terrible lie that is. What they are doing is trying to avoid looking at that forensic evidence that instantly proves Jimi's murder. Something they never did.
@Exiles800 I think the whole thing needs to be exposed.Officials responsible @ Scotland Yard should be prosecuted to the highest degree of the law -This is murder, and should never be forgetten. Re-open the case and right this wrong.
@gblueslover2 The dumb-asses that say it won't bring Jimi back don't realize that Jimi is so powerful that he can make those cheezy governments turn their own credibility in in order to cover-up their murder. Jimi is so powerful and so much a threat to them that they have to expose themselves as the gutter criminals they are and deny their trumpeted justice in broad daylight. That's what Jimi is. The evidence is so strong that they have to ignore it or it will condemn them. They're Nazis.
Those governments are like rats backed into a corner. They are literally defending their existence with their murder of Jimi and hoping their move will succeed in stifling those who are fighting for justice for Jimi. You can see they literally can't allow any normal viewing of the evidence and resorted to the scummy depth of lying about the evidence like the US did in the Kennedy murder. What you are looking at here is a war against the real scumbag military gov'ts that run those countries.
This is a war that existed during Jimi's day that Jimi was fighting and they killed him for it. The people in those intelligence agencies are Nazi scum and they killed Jimi and they can't allow it to be known because, like Nazis, they rely on lies and deception. There are some dumb-asses who call themselves "Hendrix fans" who don't realize this is a war and we owe it to Jimi to keep fighting it. They realize it too which is why they'll trade in their gov'ts credibility in order to avoid it.
I know it may sound boring but even through the sound of the clip which aint perfect in the remotest I feel it powerful to say....JIMI's GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I believe all the conspiracy theorists are just people who are paranoid after years of drug usage. Nobody can deny that Hendrix used lots of drugs, why is it so difficult to believe they killed him? Some people die early, it happens. Jim Morrison died early, Robert Johnson and Charlie Christian died before their times as well. They all were sober less often than they weren't. Get over yourselves. Lennon was murdered, not Jimi.
These comments are hysterical. I didn't even think Jimi's death was up for debate. That has got to be one of the most worthless conspiracy theories I've ever heard. Don't tarnish the 3 magical years worth of music this guy gave to the world. He changed everything.
@leif77 I could eviscerate you with the evidence for Jimi's murder. Funny you call pressing for a re-opening of the investigation of Jimi's death "tarnishing". It's kind of obvious you're clueless on the real evidence behind Jimi's murder. Don't make the fatal mistake of mocking the evidence for Jimi's murder. It's real and I can prove it. Please, go right ahead and show us the credibility you base your calling the murder evidence "hysterical" on. I dare you.
@Exiles800 He died of asphyxiation. I've read a few biographies and not one mentions a controversy over his death. If we were talking about Sam Cooke, then yes... but we aren't. Overdosing was a very common thing back then. Joplin and Morrison died of a heroin overdose. Bonham killed himself with vodka. Shit happens. Solving this 'mystery' isn't going to change or fix anything.
@leif77 No, if you study this as much as I have you'll find Jimi was set-up to take some very powerful sleeping tablets he didn't expect in order to make him pass-out. The doctor who attended him at the St Mary Abbot's Hospital, Dr Bannister, said he didn't choke on his own vomit but was drowned in red wine instead. The vomit was a death reflex to drowning. If you study this you'll find Jimi had just fired his MI-5 manager, Michael Jeffery, who in a staged kidnapping a year earlier had spoken
to a still-strapped-in-a-chair Hendrix and told him "There are some very powerful people who depend on me being your manager and if you fire me you will be killed". Jimi fired Jeffery just hours before he was killed. There are many cowards out there who justify their depraved indifference and unwillingness to defend Jimi and take responsibility for his murder by saying "Solving this mystery isn't going to change of fix anything". But wise people will see that's just their cowardly excuse.
@Exiles800 Hahahahaha. Jimi Hendrix wasn't James Bond. How does me not giving a fuck why Jimi Hendrix died make me a coward? I have many MANY far more important things to worry about. I WOULD like to see a source for this story of yours though.
@leif77 As you've shown us those who deny the evidence for Hendrix's murder are usually clueless trolls. Do yourself a favor and learn about this before mocking it.
@Exiles800 and all you other faggots who think someone actually think someone put puke in jimi hendrix mouth.....................get the fuck off youtube
@JungleBunnyBob You are attributing something to me I never said. Nobody put any "puke" into Jimi's mouth but they most definitely put wine into it and drowned him in order to make it look like a drug overdose. Most of the public is unaware of this because the authorities never did any honest investigation. If you had any intelligent understanding of the evidence behind this you wouldn't flame it so quickly. You've challenged the wrong person with your trailer park effrontery.
@all, interesting , topped by agents even tho Jimi was also a CIA SOPS candidate while he served in U.S.A. makes perfect sense. I'm happy he chose his heart and played with Isleys, Hammond, Jr Wells, and the rest. Pound of Nails was where they'd conspire to off him, I'm sure of it.
THATS ALL FOLKS !!!
JohnNorthWillys 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Glad they knocked him off before he could do anymore damage.
shatchett0 2 months ago
two days before he died. RIP
AakwardAardvark 2 months ago
@AakwardAardvark You mean after...
GreyBandanna 1 month ago
Iv'e read and listened to comments made by the musicians that were close to hendrix and it really makes you wunder but it was 40 yrs ago ,he's gone and probally anyone who was around at the time so it is what it is case closed his music lives on.
dictator54 2 months ago
@dictator54 Not everyone is gone...
AntsAunty 1 month ago
Quality rocks!
tomaglurjidze 3 months ago
If JJ had any credible intelligence or grasp of this subject he would realize 1) the autopsy forensic data I cite IS from the autopsy sheets. He hasn't disproven that short of his moronic, evasive entry that "it is from books" (and therefore invalid). Nope, it isn't invalid - it's valid and he hasn't disproven that. 2) Therefore my arguments are also valid and he hasn't disproven them short of the trollish invalid trash he injects as his one and only response. JJ is now uncredible and ignorable.
Exiles800 3 months ago in playlist Exiles800's favorites
@Exiles800 Is the pissing contest over yet. This is a MUSIC channel. Take your crap to the Sherlock Holmes,or Snoop and Blabber,or I will be a conspiracy legend for food, orI am Wile e. coyote super genius dogmatic asshole channel or the I like to bloviate channels.Go write a book get a tv show or eat razor blades. Your old enough so you could be a greeter at the local roosterama. So you are right ok,move along nothing more to see here. By the way Elvis is not dead
mckeown101051 3 months ago
@mckeown101051 Trolls really hate the fact that Jimi was murdered and their usual stupidity doesn't cover their cowardly indifference. With cowards like this the offense is difficult defense of a victim who can't defend themselves, and righteousness is cowardly indifference, and therefore, by default, defense of the murderers. May those scum be VERY bothered by this and may it get to their consciouses and sit on their cowardly heads like MacBeth's dagger. May that be the music they hear...
Exiles800 3 months ago
I yu want to read a pretty good comprehensive look into Jimi's death go to Alex Constantines the covert war against rock, i will say anyone that had any knowlege about Jimi's death never made it to court they themselves are dead
dictator54 3 months ago
@dictator54 read 'Crosstown Traffic'
SmileyGarrish 2 months ago in playlist slick blues
Comment removed
dictator54 3 months ago
Complaining that you got your facts from sensationalizing & fictionalized books IS IN FACT a VERY valid response. YOU answer this question-where did you get this information you regard as "fact" and "evidence"? Please answer that, come on, tell us you old sleuth. Tell us how you investigated this with the finest criminal minds and detectives you could find, how you left no stone unturned to discover the horrific truth, and how the feds now have you on their hit list for outing them.
Please.
JJCANE2 3 months ago
Exile claims to be getting his "evidence" from the "autopsy data" and "relevant recordings" of the chemicals involved. Really. So you have actually SEEN the autopsy & chemical report YOURSELF...and NOT read about it in a book?You say yourself that you have drawn "relevant conclusions"..boy, you sure know how to sink your own ship, dim one.If there is moron here and someone in denial, that would be you.Until you get some SUBSTANTIATED facts you are just proving that you are just another nutcase
JJCANE2 3 months ago
JJCane isn't too bright. If you read his posts all he can do is repeat over and over that I am getting my material from books. No, I am getting my material from the germane accurate autopsy data and relevant recordings of the chemicals involved. The relevant conclusions can be drawn from that valid information. JJ is obviously too dumb to relaize that or understand the arguments that ensue from that valid data base. These unfortunately are the dominating morons of the Hendrix world in denial.
Exiles800 3 months ago
Wonder if Eric took drugs with Jimi?
mpharn 3 months ago
This is great.. Thanks for posting!
petesowl 4 months ago
Bands likes Zeppelin, Floyd, Doors, Hendrix give you chills? Are you physically attracted to music? I AM!
But If you think this is good well...Introducing my channel. IT attempts to open your mind up to a whole new world of musical truth. Don't forget to CHECK it OUT & subscribe IF U LIKE IT! <3muchlove
AbsoluteZeroMusic 4 months ago
The British are some evil people. This "HairyChin" bugger poster says I should be banned for posting that Burdon helped cover-up Jimi's death. In my efforts to expose Jimi's murder I found that brits are the most vicious attackers of the murder evidence. Look, there's nothing stopping "Hairy" from listening to this video if he wants. Meanwhile Burdon knows something he's not telling. I think brits like "HairyChin" feel guilty about it and protest too much while their gov't lies about the facts
Exiles800 5 months ago
Soz for my poor english, write......
hairychinfinn 5 months ago
Jimi playing in high spirits. Good stuff!
VoodooKush 5 months ago
Fucking nutjob conspiracy theorists - take your shit somewhere else.
BobTheMunificent 5 months ago
@BobTheMunificent Yeah right. As if you could back that up with anything.
Exiles800 5 months ago
@Exiles800 What a bizarre response... But then, look at the source.
I do wonder how people like you manage to negotiate through life. How do you manage to function in a modern society with such twisted mental fixations. That's a rhetorical question BTW: I don't really care...
BobTheMunificent 5 months ago
@BobTheMunificent Case in point. You protest not only too much, but stupidly at that...
Exiles800 5 months ago
@Exiles800 Classic. Thanks - I just won a bet with myself.
BobTheMunificent 5 months ago
@BobTheMunificent I think most intelligent people would see that someone who says "fucking nutjob conspiracy theorists", who then can't back-up his accusations with any intelligent thought, who then publicy says he doesn't really care if Jimi was murdered or not, is a self-declared asshole who dismisses himself from the right to an opinion on this. This is for the big boys and serious people. You clueless trolls and selfish dumb-asses stupid enough to say "I don't care" should just shut-up.
Exiles800 3 months ago
Eric Burdon wasnt with War while Jimmy was alive.Completely BS.
DaytonaGary 6 months ago
@DaytonaGary Might want to check your facts since this video contains a tape of Jimi playing with War as witnessed by all those at the club that night.
Exiles800 6 months ago
@Exiles800, I second that!
lowriderbandfan 6 months ago
@Exiles800 9months ago i came on here to listen to this song, and i see your still spreading your shit on here. Why don't you go right a book or something, you have so many facts on how Jimi died (in your opinion murdered) and they're all correct why don't just hand them over to the police or are they still corrupt. It's friggin nutters like you who should be banned from music sites, go join a forum and bore the bollocks of them with conspiracy shite and give us Hendrix lovers a break plz......
hairychinfinn 5 months ago
exiles800 also they had a ford slip off the line thaqt had a carb that helped it get 200 miles to the gallon but the cia stole the car because the oil co's paid them to work off the clock!!! man the man is holdin us down man and the cia had john lennon killed by jason borne(hinkley) and jodie foster's hot twat made em do it tooo man...
dbohnenkamper 7 months ago
drugs killed hendrix,if he was here he would tell you so.
ROMEORAUNCH 7 months ago
@ROMEORAUNCH False. The emergency room doctor who treated Jimi Hendrix came forward in 1992 to say he suctioned "bottles worth" of wine out of Hendrix's lungs and body and that instead of choking on his own vomit Jimi was drowned in red wine. If you bothered to study this all those who witnessed this were lying and the main witness, Monika Dannemann, was found dead in her Mercedes from car fumes right before announcing she was going to reveal what really happened. Jimi was murdered.
Exiles800 7 months ago
@Exiles800 thanks for that info,i did not know that ,but i still say it was drugs that led him to that point.,,btw,i am not against drugs shrooms are my choice.
ROMEORAUNCH 7 months ago
Long time Hendrix fan here. This is the first I've heard of any argument he was murdered, I have an open mind but I cant see the motivation. Why would it be covered up also? Not like he could really damage anyone capable of such an act imo, so why would anyone want him dead?
Lizardking270 7 months ago
@Lizardking270 His manager killed him. It's documented in a book by one of his lesser manager's book. It's the oldest motive in the book: life insurance.
Hister333 7 months ago
@Lizardking270 You have to look deeper to understand the real motives. Jimi was on the worst list of threats to the US gov't on the FBI's "Security Index". His manager Michael Jeffery was British Intel MI-6 and mafia-connected. The offshore Bahamian banks Jeffery was putting the money he stole from Jimi in were the CIA's most sensitive cold war anti-communist secret black ops accounts banks. Jimi was sending lawyers to find out where his $ went. 11 hours after firing Jeffery Jimi was dead.
Exiles800 7 months ago
What most people don't know is CIA was running wild in the Caribbean at that time and had a secret agreement with the mob to look the other way if the mob would stop another Castro. The mob kicked-back millions for this gov't 'protection' that CIA then put in those Bahamian banks to use for wicked Cold War black ops. Most likely intel involuntarily drafted Jeffery into this program and stole Jimi's $ through Jeffery. When Jimi threatened to expose them he was killed strictly CIA-style.
Exiles800 7 months ago
@Exiles800 if all u say is true it does seem suspicious
Lizardking270 7 months ago
Quite the groovy little diddy, nice percussion work.
Diogenes1360 7 months ago
R.I.P
TPBXDRicky420 7 months ago
Some people don't have anything better to do with their time except to try and be recognized, glad this wasn't MY blog..... ps... thank you for the post i really appreciated the post
SEVFEST 7 months ago
Jimi was murdered. So was Bruce Lee. Elvis is alive, Jim Morrison is alive, Tupac is alive. 911 was a conspiracy. Anthony Weiner was set up. Its all being engineered by the Illuminati.
jonsilence 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrSilvestris 7 months ago
@MrSilvestris What I've learned about Jimi's murder and the evidence for it is that every time someone tries to challenge it they end up failing like MrSilvestris does above. MrSilvestris is a coward looking to justify his cowardly indifference. What motivates him and leads him to attack those who care about Jimi and defend him is a common factor many Hendrix fans have - that is, that they don't give a fuck about Jimi and just want to enjoy his music while letting him hang. He says nothing.
Exiles800 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrSilvestris 7 months ago
@MrSilvestris Only ignorant assholes don't fathom the moral question of allowing governments and media to cover-up political assassinations. Your content is idiotic/cowardly compared to the issues at hand. Allowing somebody's murder to go unaddressed is not noble it's cowardly. Especially Jimi Hendrix's. Boy are you dumb.
Exiles800 7 months ago
I read that the doctor diagnosed hendrix post death as having enough wine in his system "to sick a large boat."
How do you drown a man in wine as murder?
JimmyPage97 7 months ago
@JimmyPage97 You get him to take the strongest sleeping pills on the market unknowingly. Jeffery was MI-6 trained. Both the super-strong pills and waterboarding murder are straight out of intel's playbook and tells you who did it right there alone. It is a classic covert form of murder because it appears as a drug overdose and leaves no marks on the body. Jimi's autopsy showed a knock-out barbiturate blood level, therefore he was passed-out when the bottles of wine were poured into him.
Exiles800 7 months ago
@Exiles800 "THEREFOR he was passed-out when the bottles of wine were poured into him"
wow. In a totally disagreeing manner.
JimmyPage97 7 months ago
@JimmyPage97 Without any follow-through to support it. If you follow the forensics Jimi had a 3.9mg blood barbiturate level. That means he was passed-out. He couldn't have had the wine in him that long because his blood alcohol content was only 5mg/100ml. You can't have enough wine in you "to sink a large boat" and still only have a 5mg/100ml b.a.c.. If he drank the wine before he passed-out then he would have registered higher. If you disagree do so by means of forensic argument.
Exiles800 7 months ago
@Exiles800 sources?
JimmyPage97 7 months ago
@JimmyPage97 Henderson: 'Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky' ; Tony Brown: 'Hendrix The Final Days' ; Sharon Lawrence: 'Jimi Hendrix - The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend'. And numerous other books including Shapiro: 'Electric Gypsy' ; Dannemann: 'Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix' ; McDermott: 'Setting The Record Straight' ; Etchingham: 'Through Gypsy Eyes' and numerous web based sources too numerous to list. Trust me, Jimi was murdered just as Wright claimed while passed-out on barbiturate
Exiles800 7 months ago
@Exiles800 Don't know those books, and don't really have access to that information. What are the numerous web based sources too numerous to list? These I imagine I could access.
on a TOTALLY different standard: Why should I trust you?
JimmyPage97 7 months ago
@JimmyPage97 Google around on "Jimi Hendrix Murdered" and you'll find most of it. Read about Kathy Etchingham's petition and Fairchild's articles back in the early 1990's. You can trust me because I'm a serious Hendrix fan who gets the creeps with the level of cowardice being shown by his so-called fans elsewhere. But the first thing I would say to you is don't trust me - trust the information and facts. You'll see they are there and the authorities are desperately trying to avoid them.
Exiles800 7 months ago
Just buy Tony Brown's 'Final Days'. You can get it used on Amazon.
Exiles800 7 months ago
@Exiles800 I consider myself a serious Hendrix fan. What is the cowardice being shown by Hendrix's so-called fans? The first thing you said to me was actually the opposite of don't trust me. My lack of trust isn't in the facts, its in an argument which questions the validity of the facts provided in the information. What I see is conspiracy, weather its wrong or right lays in the hands of validity.
JimmyPage97 7 months ago
@JimmyPage97 They aren't interested in Jimi's murder just collecting his music. You'll find the evidence valid if you study those facts. Try to get a copy of Brown's 'Final Days' and you'll see he was narrowing down the focus. There are people alive today who know what happened like Burdon and the road crew members.
Exiles800 7 months ago
@Exiles800 yea lots of people make lots of money by conspiring.
JimmyPage97 7 months ago
I've done extensive research myself. Jimi had many problems & decided to quit playing, but his love of the spotlight brought him back to perform. He faked his death and went on to star as Weezy on the Jeffersons' . Sadly food became his drug of choice and after a short gig as Rerun on What's Happening he needed a break. He bought a house on the big island, working out both mind & body-reading, meditating, yoga, lots of LSD, & today Jimi is the President of the mighty US of A.-now ya know
fritzmerde 8 months ago
@fritzmerde Jimi Hendrix's murder is a serious matter. It takes a pretty sick puppy to troll it. I hope you draw serious karma on yourself for doing that. "Fritzmerde" sounds like a troll handle.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Pearls before swine...
Exiles800 8 months ago
I use logic, when evaluating these claims. Do we believe a roadie (White), who wrote a book (2009) about a conversation (1971) with a guy (Jeffery) who is conveniently too dead to respond (plane crash 1973), wherein, he claimed he murdered Hendrix? Or do we believe experienced detectives and coroners, who notice small details in a high profile cases? How often do 1st time killers fool guys, who've seen hundreds of murder scenes? Lacking experience, amateurs miss details. Pros have seen it all
skybluemarshall 8 months ago
@skybluemarshall The British inspector who originally interviewed all the witnesses back in 1970 came back and said "I thought they were all lying". Your statement is just sophist talk devoid of any content. You're ignorant of the evidence.
Exiles800 8 months ago
@Exiles800 Just because they lied about what happened, it doesn't mean they murdered him. Have you ever personally known anyone, who died from a drug overdose? I knew 3 people very well, including my step brother. People do some very dumb things, in misguided efforts to keep their friends awake and out of jail, instead just calling for help. They tie them to chairs, walk them around for hours, try to induce vomiting, give them coffee. They basically play doctor. Do you think they tell the cops?
skybluemarshall 8 months ago
@skybluemarshall If you examine what you say it is all theoretical and separate from the actual facts of Jimi's Hendrix's death. Your input is too general and disconnected from the direct facts of this case. If you had a working knowledge of the evidence you would realize all the clues point towards murder. The most damning clue is the actual medical forensic evidence that showed Jimi had too much wine in his body to have the negligible blood alcohol content he had. When you analyze the facts
Exiles800 8 months ago
of this case - which you haven't done - you'll see right away that the real times involved didn't give Jimi enough time to die accidentally. He wasn't in the Samarkand long enough to overdose on Vesparax and choke on his vomit. The real timeframe involved necessitates Monika being awake. The Samarkand was small so it would be impossible for Monika to not notice. You have to explain to me why Monika would leave Jimi untouched covered in vomit without trying to help him? She knew he was murdered
Exiles800 8 months ago
Jimi's body was found on the bed fully clothed with what the ambulance men said was a "grotesque" amount of vomit covering him from his shoulders up. This was the body's violent reaction to being drowned in wine. His blood barbiturate was at a knock-out level. This means he was passed-out and couldn't have drank the many bottles of wine witnessed in his lungs by Dr Bannister while he was still conscious. And he couldn't have drank the wine earlier because it would have registered in his blood.
Exiles800 8 months ago
@Exiles800 I don't claim to know all the facts. But, I was heavily involved in the drug counterculture in the 70s. I have personally witnessed several drug overdoses. And I am telling you, not everyone present for a drug overdose, responds safely and properly. Especially during an era, when everyone present, including the victim, could've face years in prison, just for a small pot possession, charge. Panic, creates extreme danger for the victims and the helpers often do REALLY stupid sh*t!
skybluemarshall 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When we wake up to the truth of life, inspired music like this will emerge and flourish again. Search "Truth Contest" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the truth
vividDC 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hhey, man. can you email me the pic from this video? rudyrayoct@gmail.com
rudyrayoct 8 months ago
The truth? Hendrix is still alive and playing in a little band in Spokane Washington. He got tired of being ripped off and dealing with lawyers, so he asked his good friend Freddy Taylor to sub for him on the last tour as they resembled each other and Freddy also played left handed guitar. Jimi taught him the style and songs...but Freddy got caught up in the partying and it finally got him that fateful night. Freddy was nearly as good as Jimi in the end...of course- he had a great teacher!
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 That's just tard-talk for people who can't deal with the real evidence. Jimi Hendrix's murder is a serious thing. May clowns who troll it place themselves in the clown pit they belong in. Serious Hendrix fans appreciate the evidence for Jimi's murder. Non-serious ones don't.
Exiles800 8 months ago
...and sometimes "Tard" talk is all about seeing conspiracys every where you look. I consider myself a serious Hendrix fan. But reading what I have about him, I see no reason in the world to believe someone would have murdered him, much less with his own vomit. The truth may not be easy or fun to accept, but sometimes bad things happen that really are NOT due to a conspiracy...it's real life.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 You're just offering a worthless uneducated opinion. Hints of foul play are roughly seen in Tony Brown's book 'Final Days' and loosely pointed at in Henderson's 'Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky'. You're obviously just a shallow person whose best offering is "reading what I've read about him etc" Sorry, that's not good enough and you have to show you have credible understanding of the forensic evidence and other key clues like Jeffery's motives. You're just offering trolling denial.
Exiles800 8 months ago
If you were really a serious Hendrix fan you would realize Jeffery staged a fake kidnapping of Jimi and put him on the phone while still strapped into a chair and told him "There are some very powerful people who depend on me being your manager and if you fire me you will be killed." Jimi fired Jeffery 10 hours before he was killed by a method only intel practices. Alcohol/barbiturate overdoses were a classic covert murder method. Jimi was tracing his $ to some serious CIA Bahamian banks.
Exiles800 8 months ago
The trouble with the so-called "Hendrix Community" is there are people who have very superficial knowledge of Jimi through some biographies who don't mind trolling the serious issue of Jimi's murder even though it's obvious they don't have any real knowledge of the evidence behind it. They don't do any intelligent study of the forensics nor are they capable of comprehending the circumstantial evidence that points towards murder. Yet that doesn't stop them from making casual uncredible denials.
Exiles800 8 months ago
My "worthless and uneducated opinion" sounds a bit more believable than your conspiracy laden idea that people were out to kill a rock star. If you base your opinion on what you read in a book intended to stir controversy (and hence sell more copies) what do you expect?
Don't say others opinions are "Trolling denial" when yours is "Trolling acceptance" which by the way, makes your opinion equally -is not more so- worthless.You take everything in this book as gospel without question. Shallow.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
Anyone can see what you write is just overly-general off-the-cuff remarks not based on the true facts of this case. Yet that doesn't stop you from posing yourself as having the better opinion. Typical of murder deniers your input is just self-rationalizing rubbish. If you examine the content of your entries they don't contain any of the relevant facts or evidence. As your post shows, there's a universal common thread amongst murder deniers, that is, they can't and won't discuss the evidence.
Exiles800 8 months ago
unless you are a police officer, forensic investigator or detective who has actually WORKED on the case, you are basing your information on heresay, from a book designed to create controversy and sell copies. Where are your TRUE Facts and Evidence?
Your opinion is jumping the gun.To come to a true conclusion, talk to the people who have DIRECTLY investigated the case, the D.A, etc and get VERIFIED evidence. Otherwise, your opinion is exactly what you accuse me of-self-rationalizing rubbish
JJCANE2 8 months ago
You live in very child-like fantasy if you simply refer to official authorities at their word as if there were never any scandals or conflicts of interests existing in history. You destroy your own credibility right there alone. The problem with what you write is you refer to something that doesn't exist. If you had any credible knowledge of this case you would realize that there never was any official investigation of the evidence. The Inquest never bothered to determine basic time of death.
Exiles800 8 months ago
The Inquest was a farce that simply mulled over suicide and then created an "open verdict". It took Monika Dannemann's story without question and used it to determine its legal and forensic conclusions. You deniers put on a good bluff but when asked to defend your own position you can't do it and troll with "conspiracy theory" mockery. Go ahead explain to me how much credibility you and your official sources have with Monika's story? Britain has never explained itself vs Monika's proven lies.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Deniers give themselves away because they use the invalid logical device that people are just trying to sell books as an excuse to ignore the evidence. Some of the main evidence came from the authorities themselves like Dr Bannister and Dr Crompton. Your advice to only honor the "verified" evidence of Scotland Yard is laughable since SY has a direct conflict of interest with its incompetent handling of the case. Meanwhile what is "verified" here is Monika's lies that you deniers then ignore.
Exiles800 8 months ago
What Scotland Yard and deniers are trying to get away with is shutting this off at the shallow level before we can discuss the real evidence. Scotland Yard took Etchingham's petition and said there was nothing in it that differed from the original investigation. That was a criminal lie Scotland Yard used to evade the truth. We already know Monika's story was disproven by Burdon's admission, the attendants, and the phone records. Therefore the original investigation is disproven. They lied.
Exiles800 8 months ago
If you are referring to "verified" authorities you should recognize the words of the British inspector who questioned the witnesses. He came back and said he thought they were all lying. In an honest investigation this would normally spur further inquiry however in Hendrix's case this resulted in the opposite. And we haven't even touched the medical forensic evidence from the autopsy that precludes any accidental death, let alone Jeffery's threats to Jimi and his motives and intel background.
Exiles800 8 months ago
I'd say it is you who is living in a fantasy. Mainly because you take something like a book (that is sold for profit by the way)and don't question it's accuracy- or motives. You assume it is 100% correct without bothering to do the leg work to confirm any of what it claims. I am quite sure that the D.A., the police deptartment and the coroners office would have some records for you to see FOR YOURSELF.If you are so concerned about a cover up. Get the evidence ..before you scream cover-up.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 I think people have seen your best JJ. By the way, which 'book' are you referring to? Rock Roadie? I haven't even read it. The information I speak of comes from the independent evidence and ALL known sources for the information involving Jimi's death. I think you have it backwards. I have done the legwork. It is you who thinks mocking and accusing people of trying to sell books is good enough to deny the evidence. You obviously have zero knowledge of this yet speak down as if you did.
Exiles800 8 months ago
JJ: I think you fail to see you have it backwards and the ball is now in your court. You can't ignore the fact that the "verified" and official verdict was based directly on Monika's proven lies. Dr Teare took the 11:45am time of death given in Monika's story and used it to determine autopsy calculations. That data was provenly false and Jimi was dead as early as 5:15 and probably even earlier than that. So unless you can answer how you justify Monika's story you offer uncredible empty argument.
Exiles800 8 months ago
You haven't proven a thing. Is this your best? Quoting from books is your idea of legwork? Why not investigate Area 51, there are lots of books on that subject, and apparent evidence there. Also,I'm not even remotely close to giving my best. If you had evidence that you have seen and documented YOURSELF then we'd be on a different plateau. You are regurgitating what you have read and assuming it is all fact with no proper investigation on your part first. Your opinion then is based on heresay.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
That's just blather JJ. Any smart person who has studied this case would see it. You troll area 51 mockery too quickly vs the real evidence of this case that you obviously have no understanding of. You pretend an authoritative position however any fool could see you refuse to answer the basic point about Monika's story and how it reflects on the official verdict. All you have is your denial deflections and obviously have no basic understanding of operative evidence involved. Like all deniers
Exiles800 8 months ago
you can't directly discuss the very real evidence of Monika's lies; Burdon's admission and how it reflects on what happened; how the forensic evidence proves murder; how the state of Jimi's body proves he was dead early-on when Monika first reacted; how the blood alcohol content conflicts with the "bottles worth" of wine Dr Bannister witnessed flooding Jimi's lungs; Jeffery's threats to kill Jimi and how they relate to Jimi dying 10 hours after he fired him; not to mention Monika's death.
Exiles800 8 months ago
I think most people could see the fakery of someone who says "I haven't even shown my best" when they still haven't answered the basic question of Monika's lies. It's clear the 'best' this person has is saying "regurgitating from books" while not noticing I've created forensic arguments not seen in any books. Any honest look at the evidence would show that Jeffery's crew and Burdon all knew about the Samarkand and that it was probably a trap. They also knew Jimi was murdered when they arrived.
Exiles800 8 months ago
I HAVE very much proven something. I've proven you contemptuously can't answer a basic point. You can't answer how Monika's proven lies reflect on the official verdict. All you have is empty talk vs the real facts of this case. Go ahead, it's your turn now. Answer directly how the official Inquest could be valid when it is based on Monika's already proven lies? Answer this point directly or surrender your credibility:
Exiles800 8 months ago
Exile, you are mentioning "Real evidence".. uh, the evidence you have READ about. Has it EVER been confirmed by the proper authorities? Even in a conspiracy, SOMEONE usually cracks- and not EVERYONE is involved with it. Have YOU talked to Monika? Have you seen ANY evidence at all?Oh, no...you're relying on someone elses word that everything you read in their book is true. Yup, must be. It's in a book after all. That's why I believe in the Tooth Fairy. He not only has a book, but a movie too.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 OK, most people could see you're a non-serious troll by now. I've done my job, thanks. As long as you can't answer the point about Monika's story and how it affects the official verdict you're done and have dismissed yourself from being taken seriously. What you are seeing here with JJ is what happens 100% of the time when these mocking murder deniers are confronted with the real facts and arguments. And the reason for that is because Jimi was murdered. JJ marches naked unaffected.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Ludicrous. You buy into everything you read without question. I have learned that you accept NOTHING in this world without proof. You are living in a fantasy world where you put near biblical faith in someone elses writings. I suggest you actually substantiate the FACTS for yourself before you accept everything you read as gospel. It is you who needs to defend his position as a conspiracy monger not I, a mere skeptic.If you cannot SUBSTANTIATE evidence, it is YOU who is doing the Trolling, not I
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 You didn't answer the point about Monika's proven lies and how they affect the evidence? You're done. Thank you. The more you loudly protest and squirm without being able to answer basic direct facts about the evidence the harder you prove what I'm saying. Either answer the point about Monika's lies or fuck off and assume the troll status you obviously display.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Ha ha...Please tell me that there is more to this so called "convincing" and "unquestionable" evidence you know for certain other than what someone can pick up at a book store. No my friend, it is you who has absolutely no credibility here. Either explain how you can prove this evidence as real or concrete-the "legwork" you claim to have done- or start investigating the Elvis sightings in Idaho.You come off as a self-righteous buffoon whose sole "evidence" is just opinion. Fuck off yourself.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 As long as you continue to show publicly that you are incapable of dealing with the evidence itself directly you are making my case for me. You can't get away with ignoring the significance of Monika's story being proven to be complete lies and how it relates to the evidence. I think you're deluding yourself that anyone reading this can't see that you're just a dumb-ass arrogant troll who thinks he is exempt from normal discussion and can deal with this by means of retarded defiant talk
Exiles800 8 months ago
It's clear to anyone that you're clueless and the best you can offer is "anyone can get this from books" and Elvis trolling. The reason JJ's posts haven't changed since his first entry is he is stuck at the defiant trolling level of superficial dumb-talk he started with because that's all he has. JJ shares the fate of every single person who has challenged this. When argued well, you can see these people can't touch the facts and all end up exposing themselves as the denier trolls they are.
Exiles800 8 months ago
The reason deniers won't answer the point is because they're completely clueless of the evidence and can't. Once you understand that the official British Inquest took Monika's story straight and unquestioned and used it to determine its verdict you understand that the official verdict was based on lies and is therefore invalid. To have a credible opinion you have to be able to seriously and respectfully acknowledge and discuss this. Since JJ can't he therefore dismisses himself from credibility.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Proven lies,"unquestioned" evidence.You know all this again- FROM BOOKS YOU BUY AT BARNES & NOBLE. No, I am NOT the delusional one here. You keep evading the question of explaining what "legwork" you've done to CORROBORATE this "evidence". Monika's story, the cover-up, lies, etc.you read about.in a book. Real nice legwork there. You are the one exempting himself from normal conversation. I ask for REAL proof, you have none, proving you are delusional, a fool, and lack all credibility. Next.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 You are obviously too uneducated on the topic to realize the evidence you are saying "comes from books" is the same evidence that is available out there in reality. You work under the moronic premise that since information comes from books that it is therefore automatically dismissable. That's stupid and proven in the fact that you can't discuss the single incident of Monika's lies. You're a dumb self-approving troll who's only simple device is saying things came from books. Stupid.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Ha, that gave me QUITE a chuckle.You say because it's from a book I automatically dismiss it. Well, my simian friend, you read a book and automatically take it as Gospel. I don't automatically "dismiss" or believe anything without authentication.The problem here is that YOU do.When you try to defend your beliefs based on books that are meant to sensationalize and create controversy, you have nothing to back it up. Give it up until you can get your knuckles off the floor and do some real legwork.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@Exiles800 You are not making a case for yourself at all. Like many poor debaters. You have resorted to name calling. When people start name calling, they lose all credibility with me. The message is, "My technique is weak, therefore I will attack you personally, because I have been unable, so, far to convince you." Attacking the opponent's intelligence, is the go to, move for most bad debaters. The argument is, "I can't convince you, because you are stupid." No, you just aren't very convincing.
skybluemarshall 8 months ago
@skybluemarshall You people are delusional because if you look at what you write it contains absolutely zero content as far as the incriminating facts of this case. People are smart enough to see others who think of any weak excuse they can to ignore the evidence. If you look at the entries of you deniers they just contain talk and nothing else. The entryway to credibility here is being able to discuss Monika's lies. Until you can do that directly YOU are the ones who don't have any credibility.
Exiles800 8 months ago
You can ignore or seek excuses around the facts any way you wish. I'm not anxiously awaiting approval from people who refuse to acknowledge the obvious. If we honestly discussed Monika's lies we would find that the Inquest used them to make its calculations and official verdict. Monika's story was proven to be full of lies, therefore the official verdict is invalid. Not only that if you look into the reasons why Monika made up such a bold story it traces back to her needing to cover up murder.
Exiles800 8 months ago
SkyBlue is a typical Hendrix murder denier. His main approach is to attempt to dismiss the evidence with a way too overly general discussion of typical overdose deaths. That isn't valid. A valid approach would look at the actual facts of the case and what they show. That includes a scientific analysis of the forensics and detective-like scrutiny of the circumstantial evidence and actions of the witnesses. That was never done by the authorities. SkyBlue is ducking out because he's clueless.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Until -and unless -you can verify ANY of your so-called "FACTS", you are simply a believer of whatever the Enquirer and the World News wants to tell you. You are an idiot since you do not question ANY of this evidence and take the PRINTED word and opinion of someone you don't even know as gospel. Spare me the condescending attitude that I'm stupid because I don't believe everything in print. Use it on yourself and grow up. Newsflash: There was a conspiracy.. to create a conspiracy. Now you know.
JJCANE2 4 months ago
@JJCANE2 If you read the body of what I've written it's kind of clear that I offer cogent analysis of the established facts of the case and you offer the verbal rubbish above and that's all. I've done serious research on this. You obviously haven't. I think people can see that. I feel safe. You might like to know that in my efforts I've located a tape where Chas Chandler says on a British talk show: "Anybody who speaks of the real way Jimi died will have his head blown-off".
Exiles800 4 months ago
Well, if you have located such a tape, why not post it here for all to see? As far as this being a conspiracy I am open minded to any possibility. But it would take clear and convincing proof to persuade me of that, not merely someones word or an opinion of unverified facts and rumors. Chas Chandler publicly stating that news in the the proper context would be a step in the right direction. I urge you to post it in it's entirety-otherwise it is just another baseless, unverified, unproven rumor.
JJCANE2 4 months ago
@JJCANE2 You can see the ridiculing troll back off his moronic, content-less input. Your stupid "I only depend on verified sources" rap is the obvious verbal rubbish that it is vs the real arguments I've presented that you can't answer. You're not worth answering and frankly I don't give a fuck what a stupid troll like you thinks. Sorry. I'm not waiting for your approval since you've already proven to be a scummy person in contempt of the facts. We are locating the tape. BBC is trying to bury it
Exiles800 4 months ago
Well, thank you for proving to me what I had suspected all along- what an ignorant, uninformed and self delusional moron you really are. You have no interest in other opinions or facts, only your own. And that speaks volumes about your credibility-as in you have absolutely NONE. It's obvious you cannot produce this so-called tape. Why not read some more books about the tape Mr Investigator, and then write about the evidence you have found-in A BOOK. What a complete ASS you proved you are.
JJCANE2 4 months ago
@JJCANE2 We've seen the best you can offer and all it is is this shit here. So if you are questioning content, question your own. I can make valid forensic arguments you can't answer. I think everyone on this board can see all that you can offer. You can't answer my forensic arguments, which is obviously the reason you offer the shit you do. All you have the is self-exposing stupid trash talk above. You wouldn't tell me to write a book unless you thought there was something valid to write.
Exiles800 3 months ago
Yes you MUST have SOMETHING valid to write... SOMETHING...ANYTHING. No, I guess not. "Forensic arguments"-that's a laugh. Have YOU seen the forensic report in Jimi's death? I mean, in person? Not...you..know...IN A BOOK. No, I didn't think so. Did you get ANY evidence from any source other than these great books you read? No,didn't think so. Do you believe everything you read-without question? Why, we have a yes. If you get some REAL evidence, maybe I'll take you seriously, not as a clown.
JJCANE2 3 months ago
@JJ I think you are under the delusion that the shit you offer is a valid response. My forensic argument is that the wine witnessed by Dr Bannister does not correspond with the blood alcohol content and is proof of murder in and of itself since no innocent explanation can be given for it. But a more complex forensic examination would show that the predictable absorption rates of Vesparax preclude the wine entering Jimi while he was conscious. Unless you can answer this directly you lose.
Exiles800 3 months ago
I think YOU are under the delusion that the SHIT you offer is valid. Let me guess...you have NEVER seen the autopsy report yourself have you? But, you "read" about it. The theories of wine content etc etc are what you have READ about. Have you done one thing-ANYTHING- to justify your beliefs other than to turn a page in a book? If you have, then you should DETAIL that here. Lets hear about your great crime investigation skills.
Otherwise you remain as always, a fanatical, deluded blowhard.
JJCANE2 3 months ago
@JJCANE2 You're in contemptuous denial and think your obvious evasions are in control here. They're not. You offer a huge percentage of complete verbal shit but say very little and conspicuously fail to answer the points. People can see my skills have made you unable to honestly answer basic information. All you can do is babble "books" over and over. Dr Bannister clearly spoke of witnessing lungs full of wine. You're in contemptuous denial of that because you dishonestly don't want to admit it.
Exiles800 3 months ago
The reason your obvious evasions are stupid is because I have seen enough of the valid relevant chemical data from the autopsy to make valid arguments. You, in the meantime, are too dumb and in contempt to realize that that information is accurate and valid and you have failed to answer it. Your input is moronic and any intelligent person who read this "debate" would see you don't offer even the first respect for the evidence and therefore aren't credible. Assholes like you keep Jimi murdered.
Exiles800 3 months ago
I offer verbal shit? That's a laugh. You are the one claiming all these "facts" that you cannot back up. I am merely saying I would like to see the PROOF, which you consistently CANNOT provide. You claim everything you utter is a "proven" fact...yet all you have done is recite what you have read in a few books that propose a cover-up. Wow. That's real convincing. Why don't you answer the question I keep asking-have you done ANYTHING to investigate this book evidence? Nope, didn't think so. Lame.
JJCANE2 3 months ago
More verbal shit - which is all you can offer. Like I said Dr Bannister's witnessing of the wine is critical forensic evidence that you don't seem to be able to coherently address short of repeating the same old empty shit you offer above. If you had any respect for the evidence you would see that the lungs full of wine Dr Bannister witnessed medically conflicted with the 5mg/100ml blood alcohol level. You might think complaining I got this from books is a valid answer, but it isn't. Answer it
Exiles800 3 months ago
@Exiles800 wow...you really have a lot of time on your hands don't you...?
1Modulus2 8 months ago
Of course, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING will result from this sick and twisted crusade by the conspiracy geeks. Absolutely nothing. They re-opened the investigation in the nineties, found nothing new, closed the case again. But no, the geeks know better than the experts! They are ALL IN ON IT! From Richard Nixon all the way down to the crime scene cleanup crew! No amount of reason will suffice for these losers. The evidence is as plain as the giant "L" on the geek's foreheads. Move on. Nothing to see here
jimistreets 8 months ago
@jimistreets Welp, looks like topic has attracted the goofballs trolls like Jimistreets. Smart people will see Streets can't discuss this in any intelligent way. He's a retard who doesn't question conflicts of interests and automatically trusts the authorities in everything they do - even though the reasons why they should be questioned have been spelled-out numerous times. Streets' reaction to the real evidence is to trash-talk it with flames and ignore it. He's incapable of any real discussion
Exiles800 8 months ago
Damn! Exiles is here too? This guy is so full of BS and ever-changing stories, which I have answered over and over again. He keep changing his "facts" each time they get shot down, then he is left with nothing but name-calling. The sad truth of Jimi's death is that it was a tragic combination of actions, mainly by Jimi, and inaction, by Monika the Psycho and Eric the Bonehead.
jimistreets 8 months ago
The facts as stated by Exiles800 are correct.He has effectively encapsulated the work of Hendrix Researchers before him into a presentation that will prove itself to be invaluable in producing justice in this matter.The verbal obfuscation I encountered when confronting Mr Gleebek on this issue during a live worldwide broadcast in 2010 is apparently a preview for a forthcoming compendium of denial from various sources.The forensics cannot be denied.
Cordmichael 8 months ago
@Cordmichael Sorry, but exiles and "facts" are oxymorons. Forensics, eyewitnesses, medical examiners, friends, and common sense explain Jimi's death as a tragic accident. There will be no "unveiling" of anything but another rehash of tired old fantasies dreamed up by wanna-be whistle-blowers with nothing really to blow their whistles about. There is no "justice" to be had in this matter. You guys really ought to just let Jimi rest in peace. Damn. By the way, Jimi's family despise you guys.
jimistreets 8 months ago
@jimistreets When you ask this clown "Jimistreets" to discuss the forensics, witnesses, and facts he keeps quoting he can't do it. I hope people are smart enough to ignore him and take him as the fool he is. Anyone can see the desperation he keeps resorting to to try to get around what he obviously can't answer. We have cogent evidence, Jimistreets just has ever-growing, self-exposing empty-content denial bluster. As much as he tries he can't make the real facts go away. He's a fool.
Exiles800 8 months ago
Y'all are ignoring the more important issues-they faked the f'n moon landing! Jimi wrote "Isabella" because he knew the truth. The moon mens queen, Isabella, was to reveal the truth to all Earthlings, then we nuked the far side of the moon where they live. Goddamit, now the Venusians and of course the Murcurians are pissed.We're all gonna be transported to Pudbit, a hidden moon orbiting Uranus and suffer as slaves to the intergalactic tribunal of justice, otherwise known as the CIA.
JJCANE2 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 Right on Dude! Damn, people have to wake up to what is REALLY going on! Michael Jeffrey was the shooter on the Grassy Knoll! Jimi was murdered because he overheard Jeffrey talking to Chas Chandler about the WTC demolition plot! Richard Nixon wanted Jimi dead because Jimi was about to start a revolution of "Lil' bit of love, understanding, and SOOOUUUNDDZZZ"! The CIA invented a brand new form of killing called "Alcoholic Waterboarding" and haven't used it since!
jimistreets 8 months ago
@JJCANE2 Not only that, but sources say that the WWF wanted Jimi dead because he was about to go public that professional wrestling is fake! Here is the most devious part of this whole story - I just might die for saying this - but Jimi was murdered by a covert CIA hitman - code name "Exiles800" - in order for Exiles and all of his buddies to have something to whine about, make themselves feel important, give their sorry lives meaning, all because of their small penises!
jimistreets 8 months ago
does anybody know who wrote the riff?
svenlittlecross 9 months ago
At a time when all the players involved were stoned out of their minds and police & medical forensics were amateur compared to today, it is useless trying to go back and sort it all out. And even if you could, it accomplishes nothing in the end because it can't bring Jimi back.
jonsilence 9 months ago
@jonsilence F- You. You're just a coward. You're just a coward willing to let Jimi flap in the wind. All you are doing is fighting for Jimi's murderers over Jimi. What really gets to me is creeps like this guy who aren't bothered by hearing an evil media repeat over and over that Jimi died of an overdose in order to serve the governments that killed him.
Exiles800 9 months ago
Thanx for posting...this is killer shit!
garyprein 9 months ago
Panhead says "conspiracy theorists are a dime a dozen" but that's all he says. Real Hendrix fans know Jimi was murdered and can show the proof. Other so-called "Hendrix fans" mock those who try to do justice for Jimi because they are people who lack the character needed to see it and understand why it's important. Jimi doesn't need fans like that. Meanwhile panhead wouldn't do very well in a discussion of the actual evidence, which shows who the real fans are and who the mocking clowns are.
Exiles800 9 months ago
@Exiles800 Hendrix indeed was murdered.. The circumstances surrounding his death were very suspicious.He, form what I understand was under the management of some english promotor Named Michael Jeffery was woth more dead than alive. He was forced to take barbituates, followed by red wine and basically in this overdosed state, choked on his own vomit. It is very sickening to me what some people will DO for money.If it's any consolation Micheal Jeffery himself died later on...
gblueslover2 9 months ago
@gblueslover2 You've cut a forensic corner there because Hendrix could not have had pills shoved down his throat followed by wine because he would have died within minutes and not had the levels of barbiturate that were found in his blood at the autopsy. He was probably told the pills were weaker Tuinols and took his usual dose to compensate for his tolerance. He told Monika he thought Devon had OD'ed him. He didn't realize it was the Vesparax hitting him like a hammer. CIA black op murder.
Exiles800 9 months ago
@Exiles800 I'm more concerned about the circumstances and the "why" than anything else. There's absolutely no doubt in my mind Hendrix was murdered. I understand the notion of selfish people killing and think it's very very sick. I think his family should seek his body to be exhumed, if there's any possiblity to get a glimmer of new hope of who exactly in the CIA, if at all was involved. Just like J. Edgar Hoover, clandestinely targeting blacks, and supposed american communists, yet he was GAY..
gblueslover2 9 months ago
@gblueslover2 They don't need to exhume the body. The original autopsy locked-in evidence that backs Dr Bannister's account. That's why Scotland Yard lied and said their look into it showed there was nothing different than the original Inquest. That's a horrible lie. Just the fact alone that Monika's story has been disproven shows what a terrible lie that is. What they are doing is trying to avoid looking at that forensic evidence that instantly proves Jimi's murder. Something they never did.
Exiles800 9 months ago
@Exiles800 I think the whole thing needs to be exposed.Officials responsible @ Scotland Yard should be prosecuted to the highest degree of the law -This is murder, and should never be forgetten. Re-open the case and right this wrong.
gblueslover2 9 months ago
@gblueslover2 The dumb-asses that say it won't bring Jimi back don't realize that Jimi is so powerful that he can make those cheezy governments turn their own credibility in in order to cover-up their murder. Jimi is so powerful and so much a threat to them that they have to expose themselves as the gutter criminals they are and deny their trumpeted justice in broad daylight. That's what Jimi is. The evidence is so strong that they have to ignore it or it will condemn them. They're Nazis.
Exiles800 9 months ago
Those governments are like rats backed into a corner. They are literally defending their existence with their murder of Jimi and hoping their move will succeed in stifling those who are fighting for justice for Jimi. You can see they literally can't allow any normal viewing of the evidence and resorted to the scummy depth of lying about the evidence like the US did in the Kennedy murder. What you are looking at here is a war against the real scumbag military gov'ts that run those countries.
Exiles800 9 months ago
This is a war that existed during Jimi's day that Jimi was fighting and they killed him for it. The people in those intelligence agencies are Nazi scum and they killed Jimi and they can't allow it to be known because, like Nazis, they rely on lies and deception. There are some dumb-asses who call themselves "Hendrix fans" who don't realize this is a war and we owe it to Jimi to keep fighting it. They realize it too which is why they'll trade in their gov'ts credibility in order to avoid it.
Exiles800 9 months ago
Dat ass!
justlikeclockworkk 9 months ago
I know it may sound boring but even through the sound of the clip which aint perfect in the remotest I feel it powerful to say....JIMI's GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
pendragonU 10 months ago
Never heard this before. Must be new
kaykaysilver 10 months ago
legallllll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
anitaforgeth 10 months ago
@REDSOXNYG yeah I know, she died on my birthday, she was alive at the bowling alley in Spain.
panhead58ful 10 months ago
I believe all the conspiracy theorists are just people who are paranoid after years of drug usage. Nobody can deny that Hendrix used lots of drugs, why is it so difficult to believe they killed him? Some people die early, it happens. Jim Morrison died early, Robert Johnson and Charlie Christian died before their times as well. They all were sober less often than they weren't. Get over yourselves. Lennon was murdered, not Jimi.
TheJuunit21 10 months ago
These comments are hysterical. I didn't even think Jimi's death was up for debate. That has got to be one of the most worthless conspiracy theories I've ever heard. Don't tarnish the 3 magical years worth of music this guy gave to the world. He changed everything.
leif77 11 months ago
@leif77 I could eviscerate you with the evidence for Jimi's murder. Funny you call pressing for a re-opening of the investigation of Jimi's death "tarnishing". It's kind of obvious you're clueless on the real evidence behind Jimi's murder. Don't make the fatal mistake of mocking the evidence for Jimi's murder. It's real and I can prove it. Please, go right ahead and show us the credibility you base your calling the murder evidence "hysterical" on. I dare you.
Exiles800 11 months ago
@Exiles800 He died of asphyxiation. I've read a few biographies and not one mentions a controversy over his death. If we were talking about Sam Cooke, then yes... but we aren't. Overdosing was a very common thing back then. Joplin and Morrison died of a heroin overdose. Bonham killed himself with vodka. Shit happens. Solving this 'mystery' isn't going to change or fix anything.
leif77 11 months ago
@leif77 No, if you study this as much as I have you'll find Jimi was set-up to take some very powerful sleeping tablets he didn't expect in order to make him pass-out. The doctor who attended him at the St Mary Abbot's Hospital, Dr Bannister, said he didn't choke on his own vomit but was drowned in red wine instead. The vomit was a death reflex to drowning. If you study this you'll find Jimi had just fired his MI-5 manager, Michael Jeffery, who in a staged kidnapping a year earlier had spoken
Exiles800 11 months ago
to a still-strapped-in-a-chair Hendrix and told him "There are some very powerful people who depend on me being your manager and if you fire me you will be killed". Jimi fired Jeffery just hours before he was killed. There are many cowards out there who justify their depraved indifference and unwillingness to defend Jimi and take responsibility for his murder by saying "Solving this mystery isn't going to change of fix anything". But wise people will see that's just their cowardly excuse.
Exiles800 11 months ago
@Exiles800 Hahahahaha. Jimi Hendrix wasn't James Bond. How does me not giving a fuck why Jimi Hendrix died make me a coward? I have many MANY far more important things to worry about. I WOULD like to see a source for this story of yours though.
leif77 11 months ago
@leif77 As you've shown us those who deny the evidence for Hendrix's murder are usually clueless trolls. Do yourself a favor and learn about this before mocking it.
Exiles800 11 months ago
@leif77 no one knows what happened to Jim Morrison so dont say
MrConsityis3 9 months ago
@Exiles800 and all you other faggots who think someone actually think someone put puke in jimi hendrix mouth.....................get the fuck off youtube
JungleBunnyBob 11 months ago
@JungleBunnyBob You are attributing something to me I never said. Nobody put any "puke" into Jimi's mouth but they most definitely put wine into it and drowned him in order to make it look like a drug overdose. Most of the public is unaware of this because the authorities never did any honest investigation. If you had any intelligent understanding of the evidence behind this you wouldn't flame it so quickly. You've challenged the wrong person with your trailer park effrontery.
Exiles800 11 months ago
ha ha... nice description.... 'the unclever' love it. :o)
JakeAnnetts 11 months ago
@Aptitude Only the unclever don't realize the murder evidence is real.
Exiles800 11 months ago
@all, interesting , topped by agents even tho Jimi was also a CIA SOPS candidate while he served in U.S.A. makes perfect sense. I'm happy he chose his heart and played with Isleys, Hammond, Jr Wells, and the rest. Pound of Nails was where they'd conspire to off him, I'm sure of it.
PadreMDB 11 months ago
fantastic!!! thanks for the listen
mikeferrinjr 11 months ago
you people are stupid for wasting your time on reading about conspiracy theories... use that time to enjoy his music :)
only thing that's sure is that Jimi was above this world! (because his talent, and the acid ofc. :D )
nkb11 11 months ago