Wow. I hope TES6 can somehow use CryEngine. Should make it much easier for them to do their multiplat thing. And I always wanted to knock down trees with my fireballs :D
When a developer takes the time to actually build a multiconsole game on a PS3 from scratch, then there is almost no difference in graphics between PS3 and Xbox. Unfortunately, most developers are lazy and just port from Xbox to PS3.
I love how this dissolved into retards arguing about PS3 vs. 360
The shadows/lighting and black levels on the 360 are definitely better. But graphics, physics, textures and colours? That mostly depends on the engine and the game, not really the console.
Also, just out of totally blatant curiosity: when did perfect graphics ever make a game better? I'm impressed by this, even blown away, but if the game sucks, what will it matter if the grass is really pretty?
The xbox 360 have in the most games a better graphics. Why because the company havent the time to use the ps3 cpu 100%. But Crysis2 has the time and he have make it. jones says the ps3 have a better graphics and run faster and better in crysis2 on the ps3. And Crysis 2 have the best graphics on the consoles if the Ps3 have better graphics on crysis2 can the ps3 have better graphics in all games than the xbox 360. go to google and write crysis2 ps3 better than xbox and you found many units.
ps3 has higher resolution, 360 has better lightning, ps3 has better physics, ps3 has better textures, and ps3 has more colors. u gotta give it credit for the 360 also, never thought 3 cores could do this. in a game like this where developers take their time to take the shit out of the console u can see that there is no equal or near between ps3 and 360.
You can clearly see @2:33 - 2:42 that the PS3 handles the lighting better. Still being able to see more sky detail, while on the 360 the lighting washes out the sky.
@Mrmofongo624 ''ps3 has better textures'' ps3 doesn't have textures, it's not a game. technically the ps3 is more powerful, but most game developers don't take advantage of all of it's stong points because they're not familiar with it, ps3 exclusives are the only games that actually use the ps3's technology to it's full potential. on top of that, the ps3 uses openGL, almost every game developer uses directX, so stuff has to be ported to ps3, that degrades quality.
@ledZeppelin7680 crysis 2 was made 4 360 and it looks slightly better on 360. but this isnt crysis, its cryengine 3. this video shows the full capacity of cryengine 3 on consoles, so ps3 looks better. but crysis 2 does have things that look better on 360. i agree with u.
But some developers show the previews of there Games on the 360 why?
I say not that the PS3 is a bad console, but the 360 runs better.
But come on Man games like Mafia II, Red dead Redemption and Call of Duty running better on the 360 why?i dont know, the cpu in the ps3 is better so why?
The Ps3 came way to early out, the producers has not much time so there are throwing out the ps3(fact!).
all what i say that this console wars is a waste of time, and the 360 is older.
Because PS3's CPU is more complex to code for as it runs on 1 core and uses 7 minicores (SPEs). Xbox 360's CPU is more PC orientated with its 3 cores so it's a lot easier to code for.
The developers that take their time understanding these Synergistic Processing Elements can optimize PS3's hardware better, CryTek is a skilled company, therefore they've took their time, instead of just simply porting the game over from different architecture, which is what Rockstar did.
Also, Crysis 2 is more CPU demanding than Crysis 1 was.
Let's compare Bad Company 2 and Crysis.
Bad Company 2 - Runs better on better CPU, even while having a weaker GPU than the aforementioned
Crysis - Runs worse than the beforementioned - if the GPU of this PC's is better than the beforementioned.
Because of the Synergistic Processing Elements (minicores) of PS3 - it can do some graphical work with the processor itself (IBM style). Optimizing the hardware is most important.
This is why some games that look worse - run worse than games that look good - on PS3.
It's not the system's fault, it's the developers' fault.
I'm not calling the X360 bad either, I'm just pointing out that they both have their pros and cons. PS3 is better - however more complex, but when the time has been used right - you know. *Looks at Uncharted 2 and the upcoming Uncharted 3* - the only games that've actually used 100% of the SPEs. Killzone 2 did about 50%.
The lighting on the 360 is better. The scene that they're showing is supposed to be dark. The 360 has better lighting because the scene is darker on 360 than it is on Ps3 where it has a high contrast. But why argue about consoles anyway? You just look like a faggot. Get the game on the console you have and enjoy it.
Wait a minute , they say all the games run at real time , but when you look at different screens , you see different picture.Look at the screen exactly at 1:00 and se how PC is looking at the end of tunnel while consoles are still behind the corner.
I remember Quake 3 Arena on the Sega Dreamcast was cross platform multiplayer. DC players could play against PC players. Also i think Shadowrun on the 360 and PC is also a cross platform multiplayer game.
c´mon guys, forget about argueing whats better, pc or console, soon there will be OnLive, and then pc´s and consoles won´t be anymore relevant for gaming, so look to the future!!
OnLive? It's internet based only. No Internet=No Gaming. And it runs on servers. Servers=Tend to crash. And yes this is possible with any server, it's a con for servers. And you have to subscribe monthly fees, along with renting and buying games. And if let's say, you unsubscibe or stop using OnLive, there goes your games. The concept is great, don't get me wrong, but it's easy to point out the possible and already current flaws in OnlIve. In my opinion though.
no. crytek themselves are definitely not going to revisit crysis, and if you think about it something like that has never happened in gaming. i mean releasing the first part of a series AFTER the second on another system - wont happen.
also all their cancelled side projects prove that they arent focussed on the one franchise theyve established, but are struggling to expand, buying developers left and right and all.
butcher bay was supposed to be remade for 360 and THEN they got the idea to make their bonus addon (dark athena) a full new game, but both still came out as one package.
the plan for crysis is a sequel on an altered version of the engine, pretty much like riddick, but there were never any plans for part 1 on consoles.
and half life 2 does not have a sequel, the episodes dont count (just addons!). orange box is a remake of original hl2 + 2 addons and stuff
really? i thought you could already play the ps2 games on it... well, if they get released after gow3 and not with it, then yes, thats the case i was talking about.
p.s. this whole discussion blows my original statement out of proportion, i was illustrating a point: crysis wont be remade. crytek isnt that kind of a developer, they move on to new projects often. for example the forest scenario in the cryengine3 demo was in fact the early stage of a discontinued game.
everything can be downscaled - little big planet is coming for christ's sake, i mean psp ;-)
the current HD consoles are HIGH END computers from 2005 (360) and 06 (ps3), crysis came out in 2007. do you honestly believe crytek made an ENGINE that doesnt support these systems?
you can easily run medium settings @ 720p on a 7950gt (~RSX) and the 360's chip is said to be better than that (by crytek).
metal gear "twin snakes" was a remake and the only mgs that came out on gamecube similar to the resident evil remakes that came out in 2003/04, long before the console got part 4 in 2005!
the case i was talking about:
- part x of a series comes out for platform
- part x-1 of the series is released later on
crysis 2 IS gonna come out for consoles, and we dont know about a crysis 1 remake which means that the port would come out AFTER part 2. and that has never happened. im tired -.-
pc fanboys blame consoles for bad pc games. wtf man? i love both pc and my consoles. and never compare each other. each one is good for something. comparing pc and console is = lame
Most modern PC games are ported from console games, so the gameplay and controls on PC suffer. So saying you can't compare the two, or can't blame consoles for bad PC games is simply ignorant, as they are very much linked.
if you were gonna make a game would rather mkae it on a PC or a gaming console? PC yes it's powerful but not all people can afford super bad ass PC's and that's why there are gaming consoles
360 uses an ati gpu. ps3 is using a nvidia gpu,but you really can't compare'em to pc's cpu's or gpu's since there completley different design really...
oh, my bad, the 7800gtx or something is in ps3, the x1950 in the 360. and no their design isnt that special, theyre after all intended to do the same job as regular graphisc cards.
No the PS3 has something called the RSX graphics chip which is completely different from a 7800gtx although is said to be around the same power as the 7800gtx, the design is a lot smaller and they work in a very different way. The same with the 360 it is called the Zenos, a much smaller chip than a regular graphics card and a completely different design.
do u all think the ps3 version looks better. because i actually think the xbox 360 looks better. but we'll see. i have both consoles but i hope the CE 3 will show what the ps3 can :D (and hopefully better than xbox 360 ;D)
There's some games on consoles I wish were on PC and there's games on PC people wish were on consoles.
I hear console fanboys say multiplatform games on PC hardly look different from the consoles versions, not true. You can get a lot better framerates, speed, resolution, detail, etc. You have to pay more but you get more, so its all good and fair.
I wish more consoles games would come to the PC so I can play them at better settings and TRUE 1080P, not upscaled 1080P like on consoles.
rofl look at that idiot who said frame rate is superior but when that guy changed the texter the shitbox couldnt handle it it toke lik e1 min to load
rofl it was gana over heat
what u see in the shitbox u wont see in a real game cuz those graphics would take up to much memory for the shitbox and if they do the game would be short as shit
@MattRidesRm Ikr... but i don't know about 8:13, will we be able to photoshop weapon skins/camos? Maps(of course)? Character skins? will the CryEngine 3 editor come with Crysis 2 for free? Will we be able to get modded weapons like the UMP-45, The SOCOM, The M16? THERE ARE SO MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS GAME THAT REALLY NEED TO BE ANSWERED...
@boyscout531 Um, this is Crysis 2, I'll believe that when I see it brother.... Because I wanna get the PS3 version, I dont know if maps, modded content and weapons such as the UMP-45, The SOCOM, and The M16 created on the PC version, will be availible for PS3/XBOX owners to download. Will they have file shares like in Halo Reach? Black Ops? and if so, will we be able to download content created by users on diffrerent consoles? (It would be sweet though.) Like I said, "SO MANY QUESTIONS...."
I don't really care for this, since all this shows is things for the developers to create things more easily for them. I kinda gave up on entering the gaming industry. Nowhere close to me teaches it, except high school 3 years after I graduated!
lol they had the pc set to show the game at a setting both systems could handle ppl don't see that part if it was to be at ps3 lvl xbox would prob break lol so ya ps3 is better lol
no, the dude even told us how different they would look. he then proceeded to say that he would sync up all three systems, and then the video ended. if you look closely, the shadows on everything don't quite match. and the sun itself is beyond the horizon on the 360, while the sun is just showing on the ps3.
PS3 does have better graphics, but it's so minuscule that no one would notice while playing.
i know the engine is called cryengine 3 but what game have they got running with that engine.
plus the ps3 look a little bit better. but really unoticeable, and no im not startin a console war. infact i ownly own an xbox 360 and i just admitted that. lol
Wow. I hope TES6 can somehow use CryEngine. Should make it much easier for them to do their multiplat thing. And I always wanted to knock down trees with my fireballs :D
Onihikage 2 months ago in playlist CryEngine3
When a developer takes the time to actually build a multiconsole game on a PS3 from scratch, then there is almost no difference in graphics between PS3 and Xbox. Unfortunately, most developers are lazy and just port from Xbox to PS3.
DarknessAlchemist00 11 months ago
Comment removed
ghostslayer54 11 months ago
nice
narushigo 1 year ago
Fk all of you PC has better graphics :)
SANTIAGO103094 1 year ago 11
@SANTIAGO103094: YEEEEEEES ALL THE WAY NVIDIA, ITS MEAN TO BE PLAYED! :)
sirbenni1993 9 months ago
I love how this dissolved into retards arguing about PS3 vs. 360
The shadows/lighting and black levels on the 360 are definitely better. But graphics, physics, textures and colours? That mostly depends on the engine and the game, not really the console.
Also, just out of totally blatant curiosity: when did perfect graphics ever make a game better? I'm impressed by this, even blown away, but if the game sucks, what will it matter if the grass is really pretty?
Hopefully Crysis 2 won't suck...
AxxyWolfe 1 year ago
Sooo... Will there be level editing on the console versions?
swnzpd 1 year ago
ps3 and xbox is scrap
BigArtek1 1 year ago
all three of them look the same except 360 has better lighting thats it
JackNiccels 1 year ago
CryEngine 3 is such a beast
TenzionX 1 year ago
The xbox 360 have in the most games a better graphics. Why because the company havent the time to use the ps3 cpu 100%. But Crysis2 has the time and he have make it. jones says the ps3 have a better graphics and run faster and better in crysis2 on the ps3. And Crysis 2 have the best graphics on the consoles if the Ps3 have better graphics on crysis2 can the ps3 have better graphics in all games than the xbox 360. go to google and write crysis2 ps3 better than xbox and you found many units.
CxGabriel92 1 year ago
ps3 has higher resolution, 360 has better lightning, ps3 has better physics, ps3 has better textures, and ps3 has more colors. u gotta give it credit for the 360 also, never thought 3 cores could do this. in a game like this where developers take their time to take the shit out of the console u can see that there is no equal or near between ps3 and 360.
Mrmofongo624 1 year ago 4
@Mrmofongo624
You can clearly see @2:33 - 2:42 that the PS3 handles the lighting better. Still being able to see more sky detail, while on the 360 the lighting washes out the sky.
SFmaster23 1 year ago
@Mrmofongo624 ''ps3 has better textures'' ps3 doesn't have textures, it's not a game. technically the ps3 is more powerful, but most game developers don't take advantage of all of it's stong points because they're not familiar with it, ps3 exclusives are the only games that actually use the ps3's technology to it's full potential. on top of that, the ps3 uses openGL, almost every game developer uses directX, so stuff has to be ported to ps3, that degrades quality.
ledZeppelin7680 11 months ago
@ledZeppelin7680 crysis 2 was made 4 360 and it looks slightly better on 360. but this isnt crysis, its cryengine 3. this video shows the full capacity of cryengine 3 on consoles, so ps3 looks better. but crysis 2 does have things that look better on 360. i agree with u.
Mrmofongo624 11 months ago
at all ps3 fanboys:
look at Mafia 2 & Call of Duty Black Ops.
Wich console cant handle the entire game so that the full game does have blood texture and grass?Ps3!
Wich console has picture freezing and anti aliasing problems and massive framedowns?Ps3!
so all you fanboys: ,,shut up, cause you might be surpised!,,
ComBacara 1 year ago
@ComBacara
Says a guy that does not realize the fault is not the console's but the developers'.
Tevoxzi 1 year ago
@Tevoxzi
Yeah you right.
But some developers show the previews of there Games on the 360 why?
I say not that the PS3 is a bad console, but the 360 runs better.
But come on Man games like Mafia II, Red dead Redemption and Call of Duty running better on the 360 why?i dont know, the cpu in the ps3 is better so why?
The Ps3 came way to early out, the producers has not much time so there are throwing out the ps3(fact!).
all what i say that this console wars is a waste of time, and the 360 is older.
ComBacara 1 year ago
@ComBacara
Because PS3's CPU is more complex to code for as it runs on 1 core and uses 7 minicores (SPEs). Xbox 360's CPU is more PC orientated with its 3 cores so it's a lot easier to code for.
The developers that take their time understanding these Synergistic Processing Elements can optimize PS3's hardware better, CryTek is a skilled company, therefore they've took their time, instead of just simply porting the game over from different architecture, which is what Rockstar did.
That is why.
Tevoxzi 1 year ago
@ComBacara
Also, CryTek has already confirmed the PS3 version performs better than the X360 version.
Tevoxzi 1 year ago
@Tevoxzi
you know why?
xbox 360=ATI card.
Ps3=Nvidea card.
Crysis runs better on that Card, even Crysis one did.
ComBacara 1 year ago
@ComBacara
Also, Crysis 2 is more CPU demanding than Crysis 1 was.
Let's compare Bad Company 2 and Crysis.
Bad Company 2 - Runs better on better CPU, even while having a weaker GPU than the aforementioned
Crysis - Runs worse than the beforementioned - if the GPU of this PC's is better than the beforementioned.
Because of the Synergistic Processing Elements (minicores) of PS3 - it can do some graphical work with the processor itself (IBM style). Optimizing the hardware is most important.
Tevoxzi 1 year ago
@ComBacara
This is why some games that look worse - run worse than games that look good - on PS3.
It's not the system's fault, it's the developers' fault.
I'm not calling the X360 bad either, I'm just pointing out that they both have their pros and cons. PS3 is better - however more complex, but when the time has been used right - you know. *Looks at Uncharted 2 and the upcoming Uncharted 3* - the only games that've actually used 100% of the SPEs. Killzone 2 did about 50%.
Tevoxzi 1 year ago
@Tevoxzi
oh i see you do your Homework^^
no just kidding i mean you are right and theres no doubt about it.
Ps3 looks sometime better, sometimes not, the same with xbox 360, and yes it will looks a bit better on ps3 but not that much everybody say.
i heard some folks say:it runs very very 10x better and looks much better.
thats not true, both will look awesome and we should wait for the final product and then we judge ;)
ComBacara 1 year ago
@ComBacara
Also, I mean better hardwarewise - of course. Because calling the system better than the other would just be an opinion. :)
Tevoxzi 1 year ago
@Tevoxzi
100% agree.
its fun to have an guy wich understand technological stuff^^
ComBacara 1 year ago
Why are they running this on XP? It lacks the latest DirectX !
Prometheusrising233 1 year ago
Love watching the 360 lagggg @ 1:00...
scott98390 1 year ago
@scott98390
idiot.
look at both screens even the ps3 and PC lagg because when he walks the system now render the next ,, level,,(the outide,,).
that has nothing to with a lagg its just load up data.
btw:
Both sytsems looks the same, the only thing the 360 has better lights and simulate a real time darkness.
the ps3 has higher details and is very brighter, wich is in my yopinion unnatural.
ComBacara 1 year ago
The lighting on the 360 is better. The scene that they're showing is supposed to be dark. The 360 has better lighting because the scene is darker on 360 than it is on Ps3 where it has a high contrast. But why argue about consoles anyway? You just look like a faggot. Get the game on the console you have and enjoy it.
IxxNicKxxI 1 year ago
Gotta love the PS3s CPU
SirDamned 1 year ago
Xbox360 has better lighting.
Ortheos2006 1 year ago
Wait a minute , they say all the games run at real time , but when you look at different screens , you see different picture.Look at the screen exactly at 1:00 and se how PC is looking at the end of tunnel while consoles are still behind the corner.
cyberdaemon 2 years ago
it looks better on 360, because ps3 differs from pc a lot
it would look better on ps3 if they were specialised on the ps3, that is hard because of cell processor
Janjanjanx 2 years ago
How does it look better?
how is the 360 more like a pc than a ps3?
redslownight 2 years ago
Comment removed
Janjanjanx 2 years ago
the 360 one looks better but the ps3 one runs smoother i hope they fix that before releasing a game
jubal911returns 2 years ago
lol the 360 graphics was freezing
ADblakejelani 2 years ago
xbox has better lightning and textures and i am getting it for pc and xbox 360 :) download otherwise it will cost me to much money
MORMEL360 2 years ago
its actually the other way around
ADblakejelani 2 years ago
Software piracy is against wrong...
cyberdaemon 2 years ago
xbox is better
MORMEL360 2 years ago
ps3 has way better graphics than the 360
gejserdude 2 years ago 6
@gejserdude ps3 and xbox is scrap
BigArtek1 1 year ago
@gejserdude I agree, i have both consoles and i feel the ps3 has better graphics in a number of games iv got
Kz2Rambo118 1 year ago
@gejserdude: The PC is in All Better Graphics as the konsoles :D:D
sirbenni1993 9 months ago
i hope, this game will run on my pc
adi250594 2 years ago
getting crysis 2 for my........ PC of course!
ninjaseven 2 years ago 2
as far as i see xbox 360 just has more darker shadows....... anything eslse looks like the same shit for me ........ my hd4870 still owning both :D
tiko257 2 years ago 2
Im starting to think the xbox HAS better graphics, or maybe they didnt turn the FULL RANGE color option on.
BorisKid 2 years ago
0:17 you can see that the same tv's have different settings... or thats what it looks like to me >.>
snikwad187 2 years ago
I remember Quake 3 Arena on the Sega Dreamcast was cross platform multiplayer. DC players could play against PC players. Also i think Shadowrun on the 360 and PC is also a cross platform multiplayer game.
pelvist 2 years ago
ps3's textures are more washed out :( that sucks because i have a ps3 my xbox360 keep braking:( hope they fix this.
CHUPAKANIPA 2 years ago
ok.... ps3 better phisyx LOOLL in ur ass
paxtone45 2 years ago
This looks really nice!
BarcaFanR10 2 years ago
Xbox - better graphics
Cobrass2 2 years ago
water looks CRAZY
CPOFraser 2 years ago
Lighting seems more present on 360...
CPOFraser 2 years ago
Wow, this will be very useful to developers.
crygamer2 2 years ago
LOL no nanosuit!
DarkZomby01 2 years ago
c´mon guys, forget about argueing whats better, pc or console, soon there will be OnLive, and then pc´s and consoles won´t be anymore relevant for gaming, so look to the future!!
FXRaptor 2 years ago
lol onlive will sux bcuz they dont have money 4 proper servers so yea it will sux
SWOgottaGO 2 years ago
OnLive? It's internet based only. No Internet=No Gaming. And it runs on servers. Servers=Tend to crash. And yes this is possible with any server, it's a con for servers. And you have to subscribe monthly fees, along with renting and buying games. And if let's say, you unsubscibe or stop using OnLive, there goes your games. The concept is great, don't get me wrong, but it's easy to point out the possible and already current flaws in OnlIve. In my opinion though.
SilentPhenomed 2 years ago
Crysis was at first also a demo, to show the graphic today! So that can also be like a game look on Ps3!
bdrainmaker 2 years ago 2
I would like to know if they got any improvement to the PC version ? It would suck if it wasnt any improvement when compared to Crysis 1 :(
cyberdaemon 2 years ago
well, in this video they all look amazing.
doomsdayassault 2 years ago
Its a demo, not the game!
rafahelmello 2 years ago
again gonne be on a island :s ??? that sucks... was looking forward to fight in a city.. new vegas or new york or whatever :p
Vleesball 2 years ago
If you look at other cryengine 3 videos they show different environments, one of them shows a city.
TurboSnail6 2 years ago
is crysis coming on consoles or not??i knw tht crysis 2 will come on consoles. but what bout the original crysis?anybody knw =/
devilsown18 2 years ago
no. crytek themselves are definitely not going to revisit crysis, and if you think about it something like that has never happened in gaming. i mean releasing the first part of a series AFTER the second on another system - wont happen.
also all their cancelled side projects prove that they arent focussed on the one franchise theyve established, but are struggling to expand, buying developers left and right and all.
NiNm62 2 years ago
well it has happened before with half life orange box and the riddick game.but i guess they wont bother about crysis 1 .
devilsown18 2 years ago
no it has not.
butcher bay was supposed to be remade for 360 and THEN they got the idea to make their bonus addon (dark athena) a full new game, but both still came out as one package.
the plan for crysis is a sequel on an altered version of the engine, pretty much like riddick, but there were never any plans for part 1 on consoles.
and half life 2 does not have a sequel, the episodes dont count (just addons!). orange box is a remake of original hl2 + 2 addons and stuff
NiNm62 2 years ago
What about God of War 1 and 2? They are coming to the PS3.
TurboSnail6 2 years ago
really? i thought you could already play the ps2 games on it... well, if they get released after gow3 and not with it, then yes, thats the case i was talking about.
p.s. this whole discussion blows my original statement out of proportion, i was illustrating a point: crysis wont be remade. crytek isnt that kind of a developer, they move on to new projects often. for example the forest scenario in the cryengine3 demo was in fact the early stage of a discontinued game.
NiNm62 2 years ago
but it looks like they have it running fine. cant they just import exactly what they already did onto the consoles?
doomsdayassault 2 years ago
Because consoles cant handle the Cryengine 2 :D
cyberdaemon 2 years ago
ive heard that a few too many times now...
everything can be downscaled - little big planet is coming for christ's sake, i mean psp ;-)
the current HD consoles are HIGH END computers from 2005 (360) and 06 (ps3), crysis came out in 2007. do you honestly believe crytek made an ENGINE that doesnt support these systems?
you can easily run medium settings @ 720p on a 7950gt (~RSX) and the 360's chip is said to be better than that (by crytek).
NiNm62 2 years ago
what about metal gear 1 and Resident evil 1 being re released for gamecube? it has happened mateyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
skibadeedooda 2 years ago
metal gear "twin snakes" was a remake and the only mgs that came out on gamecube similar to the resident evil remakes that came out in 2003/04, long before the console got part 4 in 2005!
the case i was talking about:
- part x of a series comes out for platform
- part x-1 of the series is released later on
crysis 2 IS gonna come out for consoles, and we dont know about a crysis 1 remake which means that the port would come out AFTER part 2. and that has never happened. im tired -.-
NiNm62 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Xbox 360 Kicks ass!!!!
PS3 sucks ass!!!
which would u want.... n befor u fucks say "I bet u dnt even hav a PS3" Fuck off!!! I DO n it sucks sweaty ass!!!
point50DEagle 2 years ago
thats your opinion dude, one which not everyone shares
AngryLoo 2 years ago
i also own both but xbox 360 looks nicer in my opinion...
dfb1963 2 years ago
I agree but crytek are saying the ps3 is a lot better with the cry engine 3.
R3APERvsTYETREE 2 years ago
Not true, it was a misinterpretation, what was said was PS3 handled certain aspects where 360 was struggling in, and vice versa.
CPOFraser 2 years ago
I agree and i dont own either.
pelvist 2 years ago
i own both and they both rock. Lucky me.
RadiantSilvergun3 2 years ago
im not sure but I think the xbox 360 runs a bit smoother then the ps3
well this is too early to tell
well i guess we will have to wait until its actually finished
burply2112 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stupid pc fanboys. They are the shame of modern gaming.
Xbox360 at 2005: U$S 299.
7800GT and AMD X2 3800 at 2005: U$S 803.
With a 7800GT and a x2 3800 you can play SHIT today.
Xbox360 and PS3 have been owning for years.
Orion437 2 years ago
pc fanboys blame consoles for bad pc games. wtf man? i love both pc and my consoles. and never compare each other. each one is good for something. comparing pc and console is = lame
mrbigtime81 2 years ago
Most modern PC games are ported from console games, so the gameplay and controls on PC suffer. So saying you can't compare the two, or can't blame consoles for bad PC games is simply ignorant, as they are very much linked.
Cyrosis 2 years ago
lol man put this guys post to vault of fail .go blame developer or urself for whining about it. i have all platforms so i dont bother.
mrbigtime81 2 years ago
PC is not even considered as a consoles.
if you were gonna make a game would rather mkae it on a PC or a gaming console? PC yes it's powerful but not all people can afford super bad ass PC's and that's why there are gaming consoles
reggae1188 2 years ago
i can agree on this.
mrbigtime81 2 years ago
thats the point people always forget, nice to see someone gets is. but actually i think you even have to go a little further:
as far as i remember the gpu has 512mb ram and the cpu consists of 3 cores!
so xbox 360 = 7950 gtx + "x3" 3800+ (hypothetically, i know it doesnt exist)
NiNm62 2 years ago
360 uses an ati gpu. ps3 is using a nvidia gpu,but you really can't compare'em to pc's cpu's or gpu's since there completley different design really...
DIRENGREY097 2 years ago
oh, my bad, the 7800gtx or something is in ps3, the x1950 in the 360. and no their design isnt that special, theyre after all intended to do the same job as regular graphisc cards.
NiNm62 2 years ago
No the PS3 has something called the RSX graphics chip which is completely different from a 7800gtx although is said to be around the same power as the 7800gtx, the design is a lot smaller and they work in a very different way. The same with the 360 it is called the Zenos, a much smaller chip than a regular graphics card and a completely different design.
TurboSnail6 2 years ago
they look the same stop saying one is better than the other
bombastic2812 2 years ago
do u all think the ps3 version looks better. because i actually think the xbox 360 looks better. but we'll see. i have both consoles but i hope the CE 3 will show what the ps3 can :D (and hopefully better than xbox 360 ;D)
dfb1963 2 years ago
lool maya? X_X
redoubt9000 2 years ago
holy shit soon you will be playing online then a monster comes out in COD 4 lol
magiggins 2 years ago
I don't understand what's happening?
TheMarvelousHat 2 years ago
That's fucking insane.
metaldude33 2 years ago
so i guess their trying to get developers to use the cryengine; in my opinion it looks pretty great
Xnaruto0706X 2 years ago
Same
ROCKSTAR3291 2 years ago
Natal wont see the light of day for quite awhile, because the what was shown was played out like a film. Hence it was not real.
xGei8ht 2 years ago
those tv's made the game look so good lol, i want one
jezza11989 2 years ago
There is no doubt that PC will have better graphics than both
maroom1 2 years ago 3
there is no doubt the pc will also have a higher price then both^^
Griser2008 2 years ago
You pay more, you get more.
nerdydesi 2 years ago 2
wont pay more if the games i like dont come out for PC or look almost the same :P
Griser2008 2 years ago
There's some games on consoles I wish were on PC and there's games on PC people wish were on consoles.
I hear console fanboys say multiplatform games on PC hardly look different from the consoles versions, not true. You can get a lot better framerates, speed, resolution, detail, etc. You have to pay more but you get more, so its all good and fair.
I wish more consoles games would come to the PC so I can play them at better settings and TRUE 1080P, not upscaled 1080P like on consoles.
nerdydesi 2 years ago 3
my freaking goodness thats a beasty engine. Hurry up and make a game on it someone.
ExgamerLegends 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
frame rate is superior on Xbox 360..
Enkei1989 2 years ago
rofl look at that idiot who said frame rate is superior but when that guy changed the texter the shitbox couldnt handle it it toke lik e1 min to load
rofl it was gana over heat
what u see in the shitbox u wont see in a real game cuz those graphics would take up to much memory for the shitbox and if they do the game would be short as shit
momopamlove 2 years ago
PS3 has darker lines... sorta like real life lol
Rokkafellah10 2 years ago 3
what do u mean with darker lines ?:)
dfb1963 2 years ago
looks more in focus to me
Rokkafellah10 2 years ago
ps3 is better
But !! x360 not bad xD
N9oR350 2 years ago 3
Now that ive seen this i realise that the ps3 does have better graphics
MattRidesRm 2 years ago 10
@MattRidesRm Ikr... but i don't know about 8:13, will we be able to photoshop weapon skins/camos? Maps(of course)? Character skins? will the CryEngine 3 editor come with Crysis 2 for free? Will we be able to get modded weapons like the UMP-45, The SOCOM, The M16? THERE ARE SO MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS GAME THAT REALLY NEED TO BE ANSWERED...
lionied2 1 year ago
@lionied2
The Editor always came for free with all released Crytek Games.
boyscout531 1 year ago
@boyscout531 Um, this is Crysis 2, I'll believe that when I see it brother.... Because I wanna get the PS3 version, I dont know if maps, modded content and weapons such as the UMP-45, The SOCOM, and The M16 created on the PC version, will be availible for PS3/XBOX owners to download. Will they have file shares like in Halo Reach? Black Ops? and if so, will we be able to download content created by users on diffrerent consoles? (It would be sweet though.) Like I said, "SO MANY QUESTIONS...."
lionied2 1 year ago
@MattRidesRm Now that I've seen this, I realize that the PC blows away both consoles.
houw2 1 year ago
I don't really care for this, since all this shows is things for the developers to create things more easily for them. I kinda gave up on entering the gaming industry. Nowhere close to me teaches it, except high school 3 years after I graduated!
brucenatelee 2 years ago
they both look a lot the same...which consoles was better lol
ZandaPanda08 2 years ago
exciting, cryengine looks sick!
PS3ultimatesystem 2 years ago
they should make a fps where both ps3 owners and xbox owners could go head to head they r both amazing consoles
thunderdzan 2 years ago
+1 for that idea aye.
i would really love that any day.
they could even host tournaments 'n' stuff.
Xtreemjuicyness 2 years ago
at 9:15 the bridge on the xbox360 has no shadows from the object & on the ps3 it has.
:S ps3 is better
unknowuser10 2 years ago
lol they had the pc set to show the game at a setting both systems could handle ppl don't see that part if it was to be at ps3 lvl xbox would prob break lol so ya ps3 is better lol
whitestar111 2 years ago
Look again. The shadows are just different.
brucenatelee 2 years ago
different time of day... the shadows are there, but not as long because the sun is lower on the 360 screen
mikezdazda 2 years ago
nope, the time of the day & the sun's possition was EXACTLY on all 3 systems
unknowuser10 2 years ago
no, the dude even told us how different they would look. he then proceeded to say that he would sync up all three systems, and then the video ended. if you look closely, the shadows on everything don't quite match. and the sun itself is beyond the horizon on the 360, while the sun is just showing on the ps3.
PS3 does have better graphics, but it's so minuscule that no one would notice while playing.
mikezdazda 2 years ago 2
it would be awesome to play the engine sand box
unknowuser10 2 years ago
i know the engine is called cryengine 3 but what game have they got running with that engine.
plus the ps3 look a little bit better. but really unoticeable, and no im not startin a console war. infact i ownly own an xbox 360 and i just admitted that. lol
any one know the games name.
Xtreemjuicyness 2 years ago
Cry Engine has always been top notch, but this is just great for developers.
ArmedWolf001 2 years ago
wait isn't that terrain thing in Far Cry 2? But I guess the CryEngine 3 improved it and made it much simpler
Vide0sPlz 2 years ago
It was also in cryengine2's editor (Sandbox2) its basically the exact same editor u see here.
pelvist 2 years ago
im surprised that the ps3 and xbox 360 can run it! its very beautiful engine and i hope they can really improve it in the future.
Kokoro562 2 years ago
he seemed really nervous lol
Kokoro562 2 years ago
I can't believe the first comment guy said this is very pointless...
I can understand if it did no satisfy you but POINTLESS?
did you just not see how fast they interact with all PC, PS3, X360?
this is going to be the next engine that "everyone" will use like how so many uses Unreal Engine
now that it takes alot less time to create level now developers can focus on character development and story which will result in better game
jgskpx0389 2 years ago 2
no hd atm
BrohanSJ4 2 years ago
how the hell did you get your hands on this
TheAmefist 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hmm,first,this is not satifying and is very pointless,anyway this looks almost as good as project natal
darkspineshadow12345 2 years ago