The comparison of this music to Stravinsky is absurd. Stravinsky was a true genius, and yes, many of his pieces were not received well when they first premiered, however they are in fact masterpieces. This piece and others like it are not.
We must also remember that Stravinsky's 'RIte of Spring' audience and today's audience are drastically different, and even though a modern audience is much more open minded, this type of music has not found any mass appeal.
a modern audience is no more or less open-minded than audiences of the past have been. while quality can not be truly measured, one's opinion upon first hearing has very little to do with what will be considered a classic in 100 years from now. i personally am not sure if i like the music or not, but as for what will be liked in the future, only time will tell.
audiences in previous time went to things like opera's and ballets because they knew exactly what they were going to get. Its like saying "i want to watch an action movie" and going to the store a picking one out. So when The Rite of Spring comes out, people are shocked because it is not what they expected and not what a ballet *should* be.
It has been almost 100 years since Webern and Schoenberg started with serial and atonal music.... and has it ever been widely accepted at all? No.
It might be down to the fact that most people (especially performers)are sick to death of endlessly repeating the whole experience of music that's been heard 50 million times before. I can't understand people who deny variation in the arts.
Well, what good are scientists if only a handful of people can truly understand what they do? However, one doesn't need to "understand" to "like". My understanding of Carter's music is limited to what's on the paper. Stravinsky even said "I have never understood a note of music in my life, but I've felt it".. Have you seen the letter he wrote Carter upon hearing his Double Concerto? But to answer your question; it makes us feel special.
There are those who felt the same way about Rite of Spring. In the end, history and time will judge the merits of this stuff. And sometimes better music/art/science is born out of the experimental stuff. So chill, bee-otch!
i often like carter's music, but i also realize his music will never appeal to a lot of people. this is quite accessible for carter.
muslit 7 months ago
Listen to the counterpoint and the different intervals formed by the brass. Listen to the way the three players interact with one another.
jhg12989 1 year ago
@jhg12989
What interaction are you talking about?
Counterpoint??? Maybe I'm too old-fashion, but what about harmony?
lmaxim 1 year ago
What music do you normally listen to? -jhg12989
jhg12989 1 year ago
OMG!!! Does anyone call this music? This random set of sounds creates no more then a simple noise.
lmaxim 2 years ago
@lmaxim doesn't sound too random to me.
nvbaileys 1 year ago
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1udwi6 2 years ago
The comparison of this music to Stravinsky is absurd. Stravinsky was a true genius, and yes, many of his pieces were not received well when they first premiered, however they are in fact masterpieces. This piece and others like it are not.
We must also remember that Stravinsky's 'RIte of Spring' audience and today's audience are drastically different, and even though a modern audience is much more open minded, this type of music has not found any mass appeal.
reviewer221 2 years ago
a modern audience is no more or less open-minded than audiences of the past have been. while quality can not be truly measured, one's opinion upon first hearing has very little to do with what will be considered a classic in 100 years from now. i personally am not sure if i like the music or not, but as for what will be liked in the future, only time will tell.
BellaSong1 2 years ago
audiences in previous time went to things like opera's and ballets because they knew exactly what they were going to get. Its like saying "i want to watch an action movie" and going to the store a picking one out. So when The Rite of Spring comes out, people are shocked because it is not what they expected and not what a ballet *should* be.
It has been almost 100 years since Webern and Schoenberg started with serial and atonal music.... and has it ever been widely accepted at all? No.
reviewer221 2 years ago
What a treat for Carter to be able to hear young people still playing his music. What was he, 99 here?
scoggles 2 years ago
Harmony isn't very memorable.
muslit 2 years ago
gute Komposition! Und gut gemeistert.
Quadrupelfuge 2 years ago
I don't see any sense in "Music" like this.
PolyphonicSeduction 2 years ago
I do. :D
kombelpeter 2 years ago 2
Agreed.
tim23z 2 years ago
There are plenty of brass players who should perform behind a screen or with the lights off...especially the girls.
(I'm a trumpet player, and I'm totally kidding.)
levity76 3 years ago
Heeeeey.... Look at Elliot there clapping in the back! WOW!!! I can't believe he is 100 years old TODAY!!!
clairannette 3 years ago
it's some thing to keep time. it's really common. At least for me, who grew up with seeing Michael do that, it is. ^_^
(Michael is the one on the French horn. He was one of the two tapping... I think...) ^_^
CherryBlossomGirl231 3 years ago
Can't understand why people plays horrible pieces like this...with all the REALLY GOOD music for brass.
Bah...
84Zacknafein84 3 years ago
It might be down to the fact that most people (especially performers)are sick to death of endlessly repeating the whole experience of music that's been heard 50 million times before. I can't understand people who deny variation in the arts.
TheBlackPage1 3 years ago
variation is good, but in this case, it's more like a degradation of music.
iambananananananana 3 years ago
It's a shame people vilify music they don't have the ability to understand. =)
TheBlackPage1 3 years ago
what good is this kind of "music" if only a handful of people claim to "understand" it?
iambananananananana 3 years ago
Well, what good are scientists if only a handful of people can truly understand what they do? However, one doesn't need to "understand" to "like". My understanding of Carter's music is limited to what's on the paper. Stravinsky even said "I have never understood a note of music in my life, but I've felt it".. Have you seen the letter he wrote Carter upon hearing his Double Concerto? But to answer your question; it makes us feel special.
xD
TheBlackPage1 3 years ago
There are those who felt the same way about Rite of Spring. In the end, history and time will judge the merits of this stuff. And sometimes better music/art/science is born out of the experimental stuff. So chill, bee-otch!
:)
levity76 3 years ago