would you consider sending the MIDI? I can HARDLY read sheet music and it's a huge inconvenience trying to learn it ALL by ear, I've got most of it but some I cant quite do, and a MIDI would greatly help, so I'd appreciate it!
Do you mind if I arrange this version for string orchestra and perform it? The reason being that I am raising money to go to a music camp in main (i live in michigan) and am holding a concert to help raise money.
@kongming819 - he said 7/4 in the liner notes for the season 5 soundtrack, and on twitter added: "Me and Ben say 7/4 though some have also described it as 7/8- which it could also be."
i will always love this song s i recorded it on my phone i can play it i hum it i feature it in my figure adventures and it will always stay that way and it makes me fell epic
WARNING!FIRST PERSON who dislikes this will die of old age then of Exile then of Radiation then of Falling off a building then of Spectrox Toxemia then because of the Rani then of SOMETHING THAT NONE OF YOUR GALLIFREYIAN BEESWAX THAT'S WHAT then because of The Time Vortex then of someone knocking 4 times then of A IMPOSSIBLE ASTRONAUT!
@crazywhofan6676 Actually i was quoting the 8th dr from a Gallifrey Base Convention Show who when asked by the 7th dr,how he regenerated.Oh the Gallifreyians weren't all smart,the 2010 RTD ones were Evil and merciless and The 1970-1980's ones were smart
If you look at TheOtherKaneda's page (the guy who uploaded this) he has all the sheet music to the doctor who songs. He says it in all of his descriptions
@Maira67 - Well, that's just because I haven't clicked the dislike button yet. ;-) Honestly, this *is* my least favorite arrangement of all. Not the music's fault. Just that the arrangement is an early one, and rather uninspired - at some point, a new one might appear. :-)
Vale (not released yet) is an example where the two main parts of the music overlap most of the time, and that's really a big part of the effect of that piece. It really lends itself to three hands - except for that.
@novelwriting - in its current form, I'd say no. It's written for two pianos, with no regard to crossing notes between the two (actually, in the video version, there are a few notes overlapping between hands on the *same* piano - fixed in the pdf on the website). Considered four hand for most of these pieces, but always dropped it, because I prefer keeping notes in correct registers compared to the orchestral version - where essential bits often overlap.
@TheOtherKaneda Ahh right... yeah, tried playing it and it's definitely 2 pianos yes:P Unless you want a game of twister on the piano;) haha. Thank you anyway! :D
In the sheet music, notes differ in measures 9 and 11 (in 9, left hand of the 2nd piano, in 11, the right hand of the 2nd piano) between the copy on your website and the one shown here. Which is correct?
@vio1puppy - the PDF is newer, so it's more correct - in other places too. There's no difference in measure 9 (although there should be). The difference in measure 11 is that the lowest note has been removed - because it's the same key that the left hand plays at the same time. ;-) That's also why I originally marked those red - can't believe I forgot to turn them back to black (or that no one so far commented). Anyway, also forgot to remove the lowest note in the right hand in measure 9.
I've roped in another Whovian friend and we're hoping to play it for recital next May, if you don't mind us using your sheet music. I'm up to page twelve so far, and it's so much fun to play. I can tell how much work you put into it! Fantastic! :)
@tous1se1faneront - like I said on the website, you really shouldn't be asking me, but rather Murray - it's his music. ;-) (and he's easy to get hold of on twitter, I hear). I don't agree entirely about how fun it is to play - this is almost my least favorite released arrangement. But thanks anyway. :)
@WhyThatsAbsuurrd - it *is* really awkward and strange. :-) A lot of things in this arrangement are (one reason why I'm not too happy with it - some day a rewrite may arrive, but don't count on it). But to answer the question, I *think* (long time since I've played it) I do thumb for most of the lower notes, 3 and 5 for the upper ones. I'm not very formal about proper/most efficient fingering, so that may not be any help at all. ;-)
If I must nitpick, I'm not sure about the eight bars right after the H. It works fine, but I've seen several other arrangements which use different notes.
@izakthegoomba - if I had to nitpick, I'd pick another nit than those bars. :-) Quite sure they're pretty much completely accurate, compared to the Proms version. While e.g. the "Words Win Wars" part has a deliberately different chord at one point (heard twice), and the ending is missing stuff (which is added in the more recent arrangement on the website, just as wrong chords at bars 27-28 are fixed). But thanks! :-)
@THEDOMINICATOR - not too hard to do yourself - just play the left hand of the second piano (that's the bass line), and the right hand octaves of the first piano (the main melodic theme). If you still want most of the secondary content, the notes in the left hand of the first piano can mostly be moved up to be "inside" the octave melody. If that proves too difficult, just remove the lower note of the octaves. I.e., the first beat of bar 78 would be Left: D in octaves, Right: (F-)A-F
@milestails8 - thanks (and I'm sure Murray says thanks too) :-) You might want to check out the Pandorica Suite arrangement then - which ends with what I think is a much better arrangement (and performance) of those 55 seconds. ;-) Especially in the improved recording (mp3) of Pandorica Suite that I just uploaded to the website.
@WTFisJamieUp2 - mostly because in my mind it's slightly too "slow" and measured to be thought of as a glissando, even if that's how it would be performed (compare e.g. to the ones in my Mad Man with a Box or Pandorica Suite arrangements). It's just a notational quirk of mine, really.
@PigfartsAhoy - first four notes: 5 for the treble, 1, 2 and 3 for the melodic bit - whenever the bass isn't played, I use the right hand for the treble notes. Which could have been added to the sheet music, but I tend to let players decide themselves. :-)
I swear, I was crying with joy at how beautiful this piece is. I played it considerbly well, even though theres only one of me and I'm not really advanced on the piano. But I am so going to have a crack at it on my flute.
@AlleKennenEiner - Yeah, Sibelius 6. (But don't bother asking for sib-files for the arrangements. I won't release those, for various reasons - sorry - PDF is the only format they are, or will be, available as on the website). :-)
This is wonderful :) Thankyou for creating these sheets, I'd love it if you did a piano cover for 'With love Vincent' it's my favourite piece of music from Series 5 and there are no piano covers/sheets available for it. I'd love to hear a piano cover of it :) And it's great to see how much effort you put into it! x
@004304 - Thanks :-) (I don't agree - quite annoyed with this arrangement and especially the 'performance' by now). How long? Depends... I have a very rough orchestral sketch from Apr 24 2010 called "The Doctor's Action Theme". Another rough one, "Doctor 11", from Jun 22. V1 of the two piano arr. was started Sep 13 and released four days later. This one, Oct 14. I'm still improving it, and replacing dead bits with performances. All in all? A year by now. In hours spent? Probably around 35-40.
Really a truly beautiful piece, you've done it justice. I found a decent transcription for one piano that I'm currently trying to learn. Well, I say decent, not nearly as good as this, but it gets the job done. =P I'll probably improve it myself later on.
@lasaboteuse - yeah, it branches from the Proms version starting at 1:48. It's actually a bit from The Eleventh Hour, heard while the Doctor is in Jeff's bedroom. The concluding 2:23-2:29 bit is when he says "You need all the help you can get. Fellas - pay attention". On the soundtrack, an alt. version can be heard in "The Sun's Gone Wibbly", I think (can't check right now). I stuffed it in there, because I liked it and wanted to add something new to the second version of this arrangement. :-)
@TheOtherKaneda Oh, by the way, how do you play those descending intervals (in the concluding part) so smoothly? Because the notes are an octave apart I have to shift my whole hand and it ends up coming out really staccato. (I'm sorry if this is a dumb question...I used to be reasonably good at the piano but I haven't played in many years.)
@lasaboteuse - the very last bars? I was ready to say, "I don't", because, as I mention elsewhere, half of this isn't played by me. That said, I rarely let it play back like that if it *can't* be played like that, and the ending, for once, *is* my playing :-), most of it involving judicious sustain pedal use - avoiding the staccato sound still shining through is a matter of practice. There are spots in my arrangements that require sostenuto pedal to execute fluidly, but this isn't one of them.
@lasaboteuse - 2:23, I guess you mean. Same answer, though, although that part is played without pedal at all - the notes are slightly detached, but bear in mind that there's a quite thick reverb going on that may tie them together. I guess I might want to watch my octaves in arrangements - not the thing I'd expect people to get stuck with, but maybe I'm too used to them. :-)
@TheOtherKaneda Well, you're a very accomplished pianist. Also, I haven't played in a long time. I'm sure I used to be able to play octaves with less difficulty.
@lasaboteuse - not really. Bear in mind that since this is digitally recorded (via MIDI on a weighted key keyboard controller), I can fix all my mistakes. ;-) And mix the parts I don't know up with simple MIDI playback of the sheet music. These pieces are written to be playable, but more than that, they're written just to have Murray's music in some kind of sheet music form that's more comprehensive than bass, melody + chords. :-)
unbelievable, this should have WAY more views then just over 5000, good job indeed, and for all those piano players like me, you've made a somewhat tutorial so we can play it! one word - "wow" 10000........(too many to write)/10
@erestor629 - thanks :-) I must say, I'm quite surprised at the amount of views - and more "annoyed" (not really, since I don't much care about views) that the other arrangements get much fewer visits, since personally, I find this one to be the most boring of them - meaning, not Murray's (and Ben's) original version, just this arrangement of it. I'll probably attempt to heavily revise it at some point (although that will probably not exactly make it easier to play ;-))
@TheOtherKaneda I'll look forward to a updated version, if you wish, could you please take a look at my piano cover of "This is Gallifrey" and upcoming uploaded a updated "next stop everything" if you haven't already, Im quite proud of it, but its not as good as this! (not intended to advertise video)
@halfcelestialelf - not sure what you mean. If you mean the original orchestral music, then yes, it's on iTunes, amazon and CD (tracks "I Am the Doctor", "The Sun's Gone Wibbly" and "Words Win Wars"). If you mean the piano version from the video, then there are plenty of ways to get mp3s from YouTube videos. Google it. :-)
@ApolloOracle66 - Yeah, I do now. Read description to find it. The reason I haven't put the link on every video is that it's likely to change in the future.
In a way, I love this version so much more than the original. It's more subtle, and it showcases little variations and themes that you can barely hear on the CD beneath the drone of the chorus and brass. :)
@colorfulcrocs - glad to hear it. The "showcase" part is one of the main reasons I do these arrangements - ideally, they make you notice new stuff in the original - I know that making them does just that for me (even though I - rarely - do take some liberties when I can't hear exactly what's played) Of course, sometimes I also do that because a piano, after all, isn't an orchestra, and - although not so much in this arrangement - to approximate an orchestral effect with more "pianistic" notes.
@DoctorWhoNotes1 (... continued) So, rhythmically, notating it as 7/8 makes it easier to read for someone unfamiliar with the music. Easier to read as:
ONE two THREE four FIVE six SEVEN | ONE two THREE four FIVE six SEVEN
But aesthetically, it's harder to read as mentioned above. Murray has also clarified (and agreed) that "Me and Ben say 7/4 though some have also described it as 7/8- which it could also be".
Awesome arrangement! Just read the description.... about the 7/8 vs. 7/4 thing... Murray wrote in the CD cover that "I Am The Doctor" was predominantly in 7/4 :)
But this song (and your piano version) is awesome.... could you possibly please send me the sheet music?
@DoctorWhoNotes1 - Thanks :-) Yeah, Murray does say so (as I mention in the annotations to Amy in the TARDIS). But rhythmically, most people would call it 7/8 - difference being (in my limited and simplified terms) that 7/4 tends to sound like a conventional time signature (6/4) with an added 7th beat, while 7/8 often lends itself to more "quirky" rhythm. In this case, the accented notes in the second half of the 7/4 bar all fall off-beat, while in 7/8 "everything makes sense". :-) (continued)
@ChrisOvens51 - that said, I don't really do requests, and I have no idea when I'll have time to look at it. Also, it's quite hard to ascertain how much less complicated "less complicated" means. For a single piano to even *begin* to approach what's played in "Words Win Wars" it has a *lot* of work to do - and I'm not a big fan of the film music arrangements that we usually get as sheet music - watered down to bass + melody + a few random chords. But then, therein lies the challenge.
Can you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do a one piano arrangement of words win wars? I NEED that to be figured out. If you can do less complicated as well, that would be fantastic!
@ChrisOvens51 - actually considering it, since it's different in orchestration and some melodic material from the version played at the end of IATD at the Proms and arranged here. I quite like the CD version too. But more likely to do a 2 piano version - although I might reduce it to a simpler 1 piano version, since it's rather short. The CD orchestration calls for a lot of/even more work from the pianos, and like Moffat (by his own admission), complicated is what I do when I'm in a hurry. :-)
TheOtherKaneda, if all musically inclined Whovians were as motivated the world would be a better place. These are brilliant, please keep them coming! Is a duet for one piano on the books?
@vitaminbowl - thanks :-) As for a 1 piano duet, I doubt it. I realize it would be more useful to most, but right now, I'm more inclined to do other pieces. And since this isn't all that "pianistic", it would be relatively easy for someone to rewrite it for 4 hands. Considered a 2 hands piece, but that would mean trashing some of my favorite parts, which spread too wide - and the priority in these pieces is really to be close to the orchestral version rather than making great use of the pianos.
- I keep the different parts around the same octave as in the orchestral version.
- I tend to avoid closely spaced chords in the bass. You'd rarely do them in the orchestra, and I'm not a fan of them in piano writing either.
- I almost never add notes to flesh out chords, unless the result sounds "thin" on piano. Foster's orchestrations tend to be very (beautifully) voiced - rather than simply chord based. Even if notes "fit", they'll ruin those voicings.
The 5 dislikes were a Dalek, a Cyberman, a Sontaren, a Weeping Angel, & an Arachnos!
REINEJAK012 1 day ago 2
Comment removed
yusiang1998 2 days ago
would you consider sending the MIDI? I can HARDLY read sheet music and it's a huge inconvenience trying to learn it ALL by ear, I've got most of it but some I cant quite do, and a MIDI would greatly help, so I'd appreciate it!
DhruvlukeMusic 2 weeks ago
This really is a great arrangement. I hate to ask, but have you considered a solo version?
aiyeeta 3 weeks ago
I don't suppose you have the *.pdf for this song do you? I'd hate to lug my computer around all the time while I'm learning to play this.
Zerafiall 1 month ago
Do you mind if I arrange this version for string orchestra and perform it? The reason being that I am raising money to go to a music camp in main (i live in michigan) and am holding a concert to help raise money.
Beethovenisthebest 1 month ago
Excellent! I thought the original version was nice but a bit off, this one sounds much better! Keep it up!
ConscienciaEterea 1 month ago
I feel like you should've split the 7/4 measures into two 7/8 measures. They feel more correct that way.
Otherwise, great transcription!!
kongming819 1 month ago 3
@kongming819 - thanks :-) Already says why I didn't in the description - other than the fact that Gold thinks of it as 7/4 even if it's 7/8. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 1 month ago
@TheOtherKaneda Oh I see. Oops.
Whoa! Did you get Gold's opinion on this piece, or did he say that somewhere?
kongming819 1 month ago
@kongming819 - he said 7/4 in the liner notes for the season 5 soundtrack, and on twitter added: "Me and Ben say 7/4 though some have also described it as 7/8- which it could also be."
TheOtherKaneda 1 month ago
"I thopught you just a mad man with a piano..."
"Listen to me, this is important and someday your life may depend on it: I'm definitely a madman with a piano!"
TheFlutification 2 months ago
I WANT TO CRY. It is so beautifully done. I applaud you!
gcatherinev 2 months ago
Very good song i think !
rsfffy1 2 months ago
1 Dalek disliked this video. A Weeping Angel Disliked it, As well.
malcolmmorin 2 months ago
@malcolmmorin
but it has seen itself in the monitor, and so now its stuck :P
boldog97 2 months ago
i will always love this song s i recorded it on my phone i can play it i hum it i feature it in my figure adventures and it will always stay that way and it makes me fell epic
tomtom87483 2 months ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Murray Gold
It's perfect! But I'm only one person, haha. Maybe I can convince my tutor to do the other half with me....
vielgluck09 3 months ago
WARNING!FIRST PERSON who dislikes this will die of old age then of Exile then of Radiation then of Falling off a building then of Spectrox Toxemia then because of the Rani then of SOMETHING THAT NONE OF YOUR GALLIFREYIAN BEESWAX THAT'S WHAT then because of The Time Vortex then of someone knocking 4 times then of A IMPOSSIBLE ASTRONAUT!
jaykthepikachu 3 months ago 2
@jaykthepikachu Don't call them Gallifeyians. Gallifreyians are clever
crazywhofan6676 2 weeks ago
@crazywhofan6676 Actually i was quoting the 8th dr from a Gallifrey Base Convention Show who when asked by the 7th dr,how he regenerated.Oh the Gallifreyians weren't all smart,the 2010 RTD ones were Evil and merciless and The 1970-1980's ones were smart
jaykthepikachu 2 weeks ago
this song renewed my love for piano.
sobananalicious 3 months ago
this is bloody amazing!...
TheBigBongProduction 3 months ago
I must learn to play this - its a great tune!
InkycatRED 3 months ago
sorry about this, good vid btw:)
DOES ANYBODY KNOW A FREE WEBSITE THAT YOU CAN GET FREE DOCTOR WHO SHEET MUSIC (PIANO) OFF?
Thankyou:)
TimeLadysProductions 3 months ago
@TimeLadysProductions
If you look at TheOtherKaneda's page (the guy who uploaded this) he has all the sheet music to the doctor who songs. He says it in all of his descriptions
MulliganTCD 3 months ago in playlist Doctor Who piano music
yes i finally found a youtube video with no dislikes
Maira67 4 months ago 17
@Maira67 - Well, that's just because I haven't clicked the dislike button yet. ;-) Honestly, this *is* my least favorite arrangement of all. Not the music's fault. Just that the arrangement is an early one, and rather uninspired - at some point, a new one might appear. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 4 months ago
@Maira67 theres some beatles vids with no dislikes
scott19693 3 months ago
you have the score or site that I find this music?
lucabolduc 4 months ago
@lucabolduc - look more closely at the description. ;-)
TheOtherKaneda 4 months ago
Thats great! thank you
SkeBR 4 months ago
do they have it in a violin arrangment?
IluvBritish 5 months ago
woo hooo i found a video that doesn't have any dislikes
aadil2231 5 months ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Murray Gold
this song is the reason i have piano lessons :-) THANK YOU MURRAY GOLD!!!
ninthdoctorfan 5 months ago
this is too awesome to dislike on.. WOOO GO MURRAY!!!
StarPachiPachiRisu 5 months ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Murray Gold
Vale (not released yet) is an example where the two main parts of the music overlap most of the time, and that's really a big part of the effect of that piece. It really lends itself to three hands - except for that.
TheOtherKaneda 5 months ago
THANKYOU!! Is it actually possible to do this as a duet, what with the parts crossing over etc etc...?
novelwriting 5 months ago
@novelwriting - in its current form, I'd say no. It's written for two pianos, with no regard to crossing notes between the two (actually, in the video version, there are a few notes overlapping between hands on the *same* piano - fixed in the pdf on the website). Considered four hand for most of these pieces, but always dropped it, because I prefer keeping notes in correct registers compared to the orchestral version - where essential bits often overlap.
TheOtherKaneda 5 months ago
@TheOtherKaneda Ahh right... yeah, tried playing it and it's definitely 2 pianos yes:P Unless you want a game of twister on the piano;) haha. Thank you anyway! :D
novelwriting 5 months ago
In the sheet music, notes differ in measures 9 and 11 (in 9, left hand of the 2nd piano, in 11, the right hand of the 2nd piano) between the copy on your website and the one shown here. Which is correct?
vio1puppy 5 months ago
@vio1puppy - the PDF is newer, so it's more correct - in other places too. There's no difference in measure 9 (although there should be). The difference in measure 11 is that the lowest note has been removed - because it's the same key that the left hand plays at the same time. ;-) That's also why I originally marked those red - can't believe I forgot to turn them back to black (or that no one so far commented). Anyway, also forgot to remove the lowest note in the right hand in measure 9.
TheOtherKaneda 5 months ago
2 epic pianos are better than 1 :)
Alistair3900 6 months ago
This is AMAZING.
ravensclawgirl 6 months ago
I've roped in another Whovian friend and we're hoping to play it for recital next May, if you don't mind us using your sheet music. I'm up to page twelve so far, and it's so much fun to play. I can tell how much work you put into it! Fantastic! :)
tous1se1faneront 6 months ago
@tous1se1faneront - like I said on the website, you really shouldn't be asking me, but rather Murray - it's his music. ;-) (and he's easy to get hold of on twitter, I hear). I don't agree entirely about how fun it is to play - this is almost my least favorite released arrangement. But thanks anyway. :)
TheOtherKaneda 5 months ago
At bar 112, what is the fingering for the right hand of the top part?
I've tried it a million different ways and it just feels really awkward and strange.
If somebody could help me out that would be brilliant. :)
WhyThatsAbsuurrd 7 months ago
@WhyThatsAbsuurrd - it *is* really awkward and strange. :-) A lot of things in this arrangement are (one reason why I'm not too happy with it - some day a rewrite may arrive, but don't count on it). But to answer the question, I *think* (long time since I've played it) I do thumb for most of the lower notes, 3 and 5 for the upper ones. I'm not very formal about proper/most efficient fingering, so that may not be any help at all. ;-)
TheOtherKaneda 5 months ago
This is so awesome love it.
ironspoon 7 months ago
the H section starting at 2.42 was utterly brilliant.. great job :)
chapolot 7 months ago
I am jealous of your talent.
francessification 7 months ago
can somеonе givе mе a link for onе piano? plеasе)
MultiMarieSmith 7 months ago
Epic. Two pianos are better than one.
If I must nitpick, I'm not sure about the eight bars right after the H. It works fine, but I've seen several other arrangements which use different notes.
izakthegoomba 7 months ago
@izakthegoomba - if I had to nitpick, I'd pick another nit than those bars. :-) Quite sure they're pretty much completely accurate, compared to the Proms version. While e.g. the "Words Win Wars" part has a deliberately different chord at one point (heard twice), and the ending is missing stuff (which is added in the more recent arrangement on the website, just as wrong chords at bars 27-28 are fixed). But thanks! :-)
TheOtherKaneda 7 months ago
This is bloody brilliant!!! Best, most accurate, piano version, ever!!! Time to make 259 likes to 260.... XD
BlueX273 7 months ago
Rendered in just piano it makes me think of the soundtrack of "City of Death".
tangerinealarm 7 months ago
Beautiful.
TasteTheRainbowMan 8 months ago
Do they happen to have that in Clarinet sheet music????
DoctorWhoIsBeast 8 months ago
@DoctorWhoIsBeast just transpose it a whole step. (Bb(piano)=C(clarinet))
TheShelbyCash 7 months ago
@TheShelbyCash Cool, Thanks
DoctorWhoIsBeast 7 months ago
@TheOtherKaneda On the sheet where there is the number 77 cold you please simplify the melody please. :))
THEDOMINICATOR 8 months ago
@THEDOMINICATOR - not too hard to do yourself - just play the left hand of the second piano (that's the bass line), and the right hand octaves of the first piano (the main melodic theme). If you still want most of the secondary content, the notes in the left hand of the first piano can mostly be moved up to be "inside" the octave melody. If that proves too difficult, just remove the lower note of the octaves. I.e., the first beat of bar 78 would be Left: D in octaves, Right: (F-)A-F
TheOtherKaneda 8 months ago
Beautifully played. Murray must be proud of this.
THEDOMINICATOR 8 months ago
This song sounds great on the piano. Great job TheOtherKaneda.
mast3rlinkx13 8 months ago
I am doing this with my little siblings' babysitter. We just need another piano.....
I am the top part and my favorite part of the song is from 2:18 - 2:30
16zzundel5 8 months ago
dangit! i need a second person to play this with! :(
allerdycegirl 8 months ago
Awesome! I've watched this a dozen times - this is an incredible learning tool! Keep up the great work!
flambit1 8 months ago
love this song
KawaiiLACSA 8 months ago
This music is so amazing.
I love just listening to it for inspiration.
My favorite part is the first 55 seconds.
milestails8 9 months ago 21
@milestails8 - thanks (and I'm sure Murray says thanks too) :-) You might want to check out the Pandorica Suite arrangement then - which ends with what I think is a much better arrangement (and performance) of those 55 seconds. ;-) Especially in the improved recording (mp3) of Pandorica Suite that I just uploaded to the website.
TheOtherKaneda 9 months ago
@milestails8 yah to me it is to. But 0:47-0:55 is the BEST
hategirl12345 8 months ago
why didnt you just put bar 31 as a gliss. ?, other then that i like it alot i know someone who could play this with me
WTFisJamieUp2 9 months ago
@WTFisJamieUp2 - mostly because in my mind it's slightly too "slow" and measured to be thought of as a glissando, even if that's how it would be performed (compare e.g. to the ones in my Mad Man with a Box or Pandorica Suite arrangements). It's just a notational quirk of mine, really.
TheOtherKaneda 9 months ago
@TheOtherKaneda i listened to the orchestral version and i see what you mean, i love this piece so much i wish it wasnt 20 pages
WTFisJamieUp2 9 months ago
What fingering do you use at bar 62?
PigfartsAhoy 9 months ago
@PigfartsAhoy - first four notes: 5 for the treble, 1, 2 and 3 for the melodic bit - whenever the bass isn't played, I use the right hand for the treble notes. Which could have been added to the sheet music, but I tend to let players decide themselves. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 9 months ago
@TheOtherKaneda - "right hand for the treble notes" = "LEFT hand". ;-)
TheOtherKaneda 9 months ago
Comment removed
PigfartsAhoy 9 months ago
THis is awsome I love it but can you show us how to do it on 1 keybord with 2 hands
Insted of on 2 keybords with 4 hands.
dracerick 9 months ago
@dracerick - In a word, rather than going into the usual lengthy explanation: Nope.
TheOtherKaneda 9 months ago
One word: O.O
YTPstudio 9 months ago
i have to learn this now... :)
horseluvagirl 9 months ago
this is fantastic! absolutely fantastic!
kyubichan13 9 months ago in playlist Doctor Who
I've got to tell you- I've never been more impressed in my life. This is AWESOME!
theBRAVEreepicheep 9 months ago
Are you going to make an arrangement for 1 piano? Please say yes :)
TheFoal395 9 months ago
I swear, I was crying with joy at how beautiful this piece is. I played it considerbly well, even though theres only one of me and I'm not really advanced on the piano. But I am so going to have a crack at it on my flute.
TheFoal395 9 months ago
Comment removed
TheFoal395 9 months ago
3:50 is my fav bit in all version. <3 so beutiful , wish it went longer than too just 4:40.
Never the less this is the greatest theme ever my opinion.
Glassmother786 10 months ago
I don't care what you say - its made of pure awesome =P
It made me dig out my flute and play along ^_^
4RKTOS 10 months ago
Do you use sibelius for this?
AlleKennenEiner 10 months ago
@AlleKennenEiner - Yeah, Sibelius 6. (But don't bother asking for sib-files for the arrangements. I won't release those, for various reasons - sorry - PDF is the only format they are, or will be, available as on the website). :-)
TheOtherKaneda 10 months ago
I want to download this song ㅠㅠ
Geronimo0727 10 months ago
This is very impressive. Awesome stuff :'D
TheLethalPieOfDeath 10 months ago
This is wonderful :) Thankyou for creating these sheets, I'd love it if you did a piano cover for 'With love Vincent' it's my favourite piece of music from Series 5 and there are no piano covers/sheets available for it. I'd love to hear a piano cover of it :) And it's great to see how much effort you put into it! x
LauraCx1996 10 months ago
oo wow that is so awesome
MiAkount 10 months ago
The only little nitpick I have is that it suddenly goes from the Doctor's theme to the Pandorica Opens music at the end.
Fishking321 10 months ago
OH. MY. GAWD. THAT IS SOOOO IMPRESSIVE! how long did that take yuo?
004304 10 months ago
@004304 - Thanks :-) (I don't agree - quite annoyed with this arrangement and especially the 'performance' by now). How long? Depends... I have a very rough orchestral sketch from Apr 24 2010 called "The Doctor's Action Theme". Another rough one, "Doctor 11", from Jun 22. V1 of the two piano arr. was started Sep 13 and released four days later. This one, Oct 14. I'm still improving it, and replacing dead bits with performances. All in all? A year by now. In hours spent? Probably around 35-40.
TheOtherKaneda 10 months ago
This is... amazing.
The Doctor should play piano now. Pianos are cool.
DoctorsAssisstant 10 months ago 7
@DoctorsAssisstant Matt Smith is a keyboard player, so I think we might see him do so...
SpanishScion 3 months ago
I wish I could do this. But I only have two hands and one piano...
lorfheid 11 months ago 54
you. are. AMAZING! :D
thank you so much for this! :)
ocdturtle 11 months ago
this is genial!
nathalush 11 months ago
sounds like Renaissance's "can you understand" from the 1975 carnigie hall concert
cuseofmuncubis 11 months ago
this would be nice if I had someone else to play with me! haha nice vid
ButterflyofOceans 11 months ago
Really a truly beautiful piece, you've done it justice. I found a decent transcription for one piano that I'm currently trying to learn. Well, I say decent, not nearly as good as this, but it gets the job done. =P I'll probably improve it myself later on.
SlipperehPuppeh 1 year ago
What's the bit from 2:23-2:29 from? I don't hear it on the Proms version but I really like it.
lasaboteuse 1 year ago
@lasaboteuse Upon listening to it several times more...did you just elaborate it yourself? If so, really nice.
lasaboteuse 1 year ago
@lasaboteuse - yeah, it branches from the Proms version starting at 1:48. It's actually a bit from The Eleventh Hour, heard while the Doctor is in Jeff's bedroom. The concluding 2:23-2:29 bit is when he says "You need all the help you can get. Fellas - pay attention". On the soundtrack, an alt. version can be heard in "The Sun's Gone Wibbly", I think (can't check right now). I stuffed it in there, because I liked it and wanted to add something new to the second version of this arrangement. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda Thanks! I was really wondering where it was from.
lasaboteuse 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda Oh, by the way, how do you play those descending intervals (in the concluding part) so smoothly? Because the notes are an octave apart I have to shift my whole hand and it ends up coming out really staccato. (I'm sorry if this is a dumb question...I used to be reasonably good at the piano but I haven't played in many years.)
lasaboteuse 1 year ago
@lasaboteuse - the very last bars? I was ready to say, "I don't", because, as I mention elsewhere, half of this isn't played by me. That said, I rarely let it play back like that if it *can't* be played like that, and the ending, for once, *is* my playing :-), most of it involving judicious sustain pedal use - avoiding the staccato sound still shining through is a matter of practice. There are spots in my arrangements that require sostenuto pedal to execute fluidly, but this isn't one of them.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda I just meant 0:23-0:29.
lasaboteuse 1 year ago
@lasaboteuse - 2:23, I guess you mean. Same answer, though, although that part is played without pedal at all - the notes are slightly detached, but bear in mind that there's a quite thick reverb going on that may tie them together. I guess I might want to watch my octaves in arrangements - not the thing I'd expect people to get stuck with, but maybe I'm too used to them. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda Well, you're a very accomplished pianist. Also, I haven't played in a long time. I'm sure I used to be able to play octaves with less difficulty.
lasaboteuse 1 year ago
@lasaboteuse - not really. Bear in mind that since this is digitally recorded (via MIDI on a weighted key keyboard controller), I can fix all my mistakes. ;-) And mix the parts I don't know up with simple MIDI playback of the sheet music. These pieces are written to be playable, but more than that, they're written just to have Murray's music in some kind of sheet music form that's more comprehensive than bass, melody + chords. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
can i get a copy of the PDF please?
ashlawn10h 1 year ago
@ashlawn10h Not without reading the description...
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
unbelievable, this should have WAY more views then just over 5000, good job indeed, and for all those piano players like me, you've made a somewhat tutorial so we can play it! one word - "wow" 10000........(too many to write)/10
erestor629 1 year ago 21
@erestor629 - thanks :-) I must say, I'm quite surprised at the amount of views - and more "annoyed" (not really, since I don't much care about views) that the other arrangements get much fewer visits, since personally, I find this one to be the most boring of them - meaning, not Murray's (and Ben's) original version, just this arrangement of it. I'll probably attempt to heavily revise it at some point (although that will probably not exactly make it easier to play ;-))
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
Comment removed
erestor629 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda I'll look forward to a updated version, if you wish, could you please take a look at my piano cover of "This is Gallifrey" and upcoming uploaded a updated "next stop everything" if you haven't already, Im quite proud of it, but its not as good as this! (not intended to advertise video)
erestor629 1 year ago
is it posible to get an mp3 download for the bit you played oris it all on the itunes link ?
halfcelestialelf 1 year ago
@halfcelestialelf - not sure what you mean. If you mean the original orchestral music, then yes, it's on iTunes, amazon and CD (tracks "I Am the Doctor", "The Sun's Gone Wibbly" and "Words Win Wars"). If you mean the piano version from the video, then there are plenty of ways to get mp3s from YouTube videos. Google it. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
Do you have the midi file available for download? Just to make it easier to import into my sheetmusic reader. =]
VengeanceNick 1 year ago
@VengeanceNick - sorry, nope. Just the PDF file.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
I AM The Doctor! And you are the Daleks!
marduke45 1 year ago
This is all utter genius, You are absolutely amazing! Thank you - I've been looking everywhere for this! <3
Vladdmeir 1 year ago
@ApolloOracle66 - Yeah, I do now. Read description to find it. The reason I haven't put the link on every video is that it's likely to change in the future.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
Did you use Sibelius to make the score?
VDAIsaac 1 year ago
@VDAIsaac Sibelius 6, yeah.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda Thanks! Appreciate it!
VDAIsaac 1 year ago
In a way, I love this version so much more than the original. It's more subtle, and it showcases little variations and themes that you can barely hear on the CD beneath the drone of the chorus and brass. :)
colorfulcrocs 1 year ago
@colorfulcrocs - glad to hear it. The "showcase" part is one of the main reasons I do these arrangements - ideally, they make you notice new stuff in the original - I know that making them does just that for me (even though I - rarely - do take some liberties when I can't hear exactly what's played) Of course, sometimes I also do that because a piano, after all, isn't an orchestra, and - although not so much in this arrangement - to approximate an orchestral effect with more "pianistic" notes.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@DoctorWhoNotes1 (... continued) So, rhythmically, notating it as 7/8 makes it easier to read for someone unfamiliar with the music. Easier to read as:
ONE two THREE four FIVE six SEVEN | ONE two THREE four FIVE six SEVEN
rather than:
ONE-and TWO-and THREE-and FOUR-AND five-AND six-AND seven-AND
But aesthetically, it's harder to read as mentioned above. Murray has also clarified (and agreed) that "Me and Ben say 7/4 though some have also described it as 7/8- which it could also be".
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda Fair enoughsky :)
DoctorWhoNotes1 1 year ago
@DoctorWhoNotes1 :-) Sent you the sheets on the same mail as the other. If you didn't get them, just PM me.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@TheOtherKaneda I have it, you've saved my IB :D
DoctorWhoNotes1 1 year ago
Awesome arrangement! Just read the description.... about the 7/8 vs. 7/4 thing... Murray wrote in the CD cover that "I Am The Doctor" was predominantly in 7/4 :)
But this song (and your piano version) is awesome.... could you possibly please send me the sheet music?
DoctorWhoNotes1 1 year ago
@DoctorWhoNotes1 - Thanks :-) Yeah, Murray does say so (as I mention in the annotations to Amy in the TARDIS). But rhythmically, most people would call it 7/8 - difference being (in my limited and simplified terms) that 7/4 tends to sound like a conventional time signature (6/4) with an added 7th beat, while 7/8 often lends itself to more "quirky" rhythm. In this case, the accented notes in the second half of the 7/4 bar all fall off-beat, while in 7/8 "everything makes sense". :-) (continued)
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
@ChrisOvens51 - that said, I don't really do requests, and I have no idea when I'll have time to look at it. Also, it's quite hard to ascertain how much less complicated "less complicated" means. For a single piano to even *begin* to approach what's played in "Words Win Wars" it has a *lot* of work to do - and I'm not a big fan of the film music arrangements that we usually get as sheet music - watered down to bass + melody + a few random chords. But then, therein lies the challenge.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
Can you PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do a one piano arrangement of words win wars? I NEED that to be figured out. If you can do less complicated as well, that would be fantastic!
ChrisOvens51 1 year ago
@ChrisOvens51 - actually considering it, since it's different in orchestration and some melodic material from the version played at the end of IATD at the Proms and arranged here. I quite like the CD version too. But more likely to do a 2 piano version - although I might reduce it to a simpler 1 piano version, since it's rather short. The CD orchestration calls for a lot of/even more work from the pianos, and like Moffat (by his own admission), complicated is what I do when I'm in a hurry. :-)
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
as david tennant would say "MOLTO BENE!!!"
phreezerburne 1 year ago
@phreezerburne Actually he would say "Brilliant!" XD
Angryification 1 year ago
o_o That was Really Immense the most Epic song i know on Piano Wonderful Job!
Ltd091 1 year ago
As the Ninth Doctor would say,FANTASTIC!!!!!!!
TheRonak1993 1 year ago 2
I LOVE IT :)
Jaytheman999 1 year ago
Brilliant!! :)
socksofbalhoon 1 year ago
unbelievably fantastic. Just superb.
MrSIDRAT 1 year ago
Love it....
This is your best work ever my friend.
Royal Albert Hall and Doctor Who Proms 2010.
:D
Thomsen1975 1 year ago
@Thomsen1975 - "Ever"? 32 years of punk and all kinds of craziness, and it all amount to this? ;-)
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
Comment removed
Thomsen1975 1 year ago
TheOtherKaneda, if all musically inclined Whovians were as motivated the world would be a better place. These are brilliant, please keep them coming! Is a duet for one piano on the books?
vitaminbowl 1 year ago
@vitaminbowl - thanks :-) As for a 1 piano duet, I doubt it. I realize it would be more useful to most, but right now, I'm more inclined to do other pieces. And since this isn't all that "pianistic", it would be relatively easy for someone to rewrite it for 4 hands. Considered a 2 hands piece, but that would mean trashing some of my favorite parts, which spread too wide - and the priority in these pieces is really to be close to the orchestral version rather than making great use of the pianos.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
... which leads to some "rules":
- I keep the different parts around the same octave as in the orchestral version.
- I tend to avoid closely spaced chords in the bass. You'd rarely do them in the orchestra, and I'm not a fan of them in piano writing either.
- I almost never add notes to flesh out chords, unless the result sounds "thin" on piano. Foster's orchestrations tend to be very (beautifully) voiced - rather than simply chord based. Even if notes "fit", they'll ruin those voicings.
TheOtherKaneda 1 year ago
Nice one!
unoficial13thdoctor 1 year ago