Hi. this is exactly a theory I had in mind for years. you just put in wonderfully in words. I always have the feeling that this idea is not fully treated in modern physics and much potential in it to understand what time matter and motion are.
Great thoughts. The burgeoning evolutionary group consciousness has got a hunch that the magic lies in the "betwixt and between." We're on the brink of discovery.
@rocker97202 I would love too but I enjoy building things too much. I would prefer to build things using the breakthroughs that scientists provide. Peace Bro
Excellent!...Nassim says much fo the same thing. With regards to the Collider & other concepts, too: That as humans we can try to find the smallest unit of anything - but that we'd be entering into trying to test out infinity forever...So that maybe we want to focus more on the principles behind infinity since it can be a concept that moves in any 'direction.' Not the least of which is outward as well as inward.
Nice video! Interesting idea. The Nyquist frequency is always half the sampling rate. If the planck length is the sampling rate and everything smaller than that is "between the frames", then is our reality's nyquist frequency 2 planck lengths?
In a text blog I put up on December 20th called "Consciousness in Frames Per Second" (just google that phrase in quotes and it should come up at the top) I discussed the nyquist frequency along with planck length and our role as observers. Seems to be...
I guess its the smallest measurement that would be useful or possible for us. You could make up any explanation for what's inside of that radius and would never be able to prove it, or make any use of it.
The sampling rate of the brain is limited as you say. Something that moves forward, backward then forward may be perceived as only moving forward. This would lead to anomalies from time to time. Occasionally, the sample may accidentally fall when the object is moving backwards. This is why unexpected results can be so exciting. This is a good analogy for many unexpected phenomena that appear anomalous. Our perceptive apparatus has a limited resolution. Good observation. PS I'm snowed-in!
Hi. this is exactly a theory I had in mind for years. you just put in wonderfully in words. I always have the feeling that this idea is not fully treated in modern physics and much potential in it to understand what time matter and motion are.
MyshMashko 5 months ago
Great thoughts. The burgeoning evolutionary group consciousness has got a hunch that the magic lies in the "betwixt and between." We're on the brink of discovery.
petrox5 1 year ago
the nyquist rate on your camera sucks... lol :)
huntercarney1 1 year ago
@huntercarney1 hahaha.. yes it does.
gadzometer 1 year ago
@gadzometer Simulation argument?
JohananRaatz 1 month ago
u should quit ur job and be a scientist.. make alot of money
rocker97202 1 year ago
@rocker97202 I would love too but I enjoy building things too much. I would prefer to build things using the breakthroughs that scientists provide. Peace Bro
gadzometer 1 year ago
very good video, very beautiful analogy.
thnx
osamabinladin4u 1 year ago
"Life" is a frequency, like a Sin wave landing between planck lengths that we cannot measure.
mescience 2 years ago
Very good comment. I have often wondered if the planck length is just the crest of a wave.
gadzometer 2 years ago
Excellent!...Nassim says much fo the same thing. With regards to the Collider & other concepts, too: That as humans we can try to find the smallest unit of anything - but that we'd be entering into trying to test out infinity forever...So that maybe we want to focus more on the principles behind infinity since it can be a concept that moves in any 'direction.' Not the least of which is outward as well as inward.
11moonelf 2 years ago
I liked the LED matrix analogy as well. Being a computer guy, it made a lot of sense and very easy to adapt to.
joelito101 2 years ago
Nice video! Interesting idea. The Nyquist frequency is always half the sampling rate. If the planck length is the sampling rate and everything smaller than that is "between the frames", then is our reality's nyquist frequency 2 planck lengths?
In a text blog I put up on December 20th called "Consciousness in Frames Per Second" (just google that phrase in quotes and it should come up at the top) I discussed the nyquist frequency along with planck length and our role as observers. Seems to be...
10thdim 2 years ago
connected to the exploration you got into here.
I do really like the LED matrix analogy, I'll have to use that some time (giving you credit of course!).
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
I thought you would like the analogy. I personally always work better with visual representations and it seemed appropriate.
Keep up the good work.
Gadz
gadzometer 2 years ago
I'm not even sure that invalid thoughts are a waste of time, so why you think your valid ones are, I can't fathom...
Really good analogy for the particle/wave problem. And considering what we can't perceive (sub Planck's length) is always fun too.
FractalInfinities 2 years ago
Yeah. Maybe one day we will know all the answers but probably not while we are alive. :)
gadzometer 2 years ago
All the answers?! --- Never...
FractalInfinities 2 years ago
I guess its the smallest measurement that would be useful or possible for us. You could make up any explanation for what's inside of that radius and would never be able to prove it, or make any use of it.
simonodell 2 years ago
We could never prove it but I don't know if we could ever make use of it.
gadzometer 2 years ago
Like exploiting some sort of sub-plank length property to create a macroscopic effect?
I have a feeling that such a thing would be impossible, but I cannot say for sure why.
simonodell 2 years ago
The sampling rate of the brain is limited as you say. Something that moves forward, backward then forward may be perceived as only moving forward. This would lead to anomalies from time to time. Occasionally, the sample may accidentally fall when the object is moving backwards. This is why unexpected results can be so exciting. This is a good analogy for many unexpected phenomena that appear anomalous. Our perceptive apparatus has a limited resolution. Good observation. PS I'm snowed-in!
alanstarkie2001 2 years ago
And we just had one of the hottest on record. We need a big pipe between our countries and pump air through it. :)
gadzometer 2 years ago
I am interested in what you have to say....lol :D Good to see ya M8.
CosmicDramaQueen 2 years ago
Thanks Sis.
gadzometer 2 years ago