I tend to like Cage's movies but TWM remake just stank. It wasn't just Cage tho, there's plenty of VERY GOOD actors/actresses in TWM remake but they all seemed to suck in it None of them come close to Woodward. He was a lovely guy too.
BTW somethin funny. I remembr reading that the original wicker man was set in summer but had to be shot nearer to winter so to avoid the actors breaths showing on camera, they all had to suck on ice cubes between takes. Fair play to them
Proof that horror direction can't be ham-fisted like that. The reveal of the wicker man itself in the original is as chilling as anything I've ever seen because it's so delicate and restrained. All the horror is filtered through Woodward's fantastic performance. But the remake might as well have neon signs around its wicker man saying, "Boo!" Also the original is actually about something whereas the remake is just a bad episode of The Twilight Zone. When will Hollywood understand this?
Interesting comparison. Good job. I liked how the wicker man looked in the re-make, but that was all I liked about it. The original is a masterpiece, the remake is carp. If ya know what I mean.
your an idiot. He added so much power to the movie because it was christianity vs paganism. Despite Nic being the greatest actor in the universe, he just yelled bloody murder the whole time.
Dude... The first ending of the first movie was horribly amazingly terrifying.
Thelittleblackjack2 4 months ago
The re-make is complete garbage!
AodhBheagan 5 months ago
lol
JamesHoganable 6 months ago
TulseLuper got it spot on.
I tend to like Cage's movies but TWM remake just stank. It wasn't just Cage tho, there's plenty of VERY GOOD actors/actresses in TWM remake but they all seemed to suck in it None of them come close to Woodward. He was a lovely guy too.
BTW somethin funny. I remembr reading that the original wicker man was set in summer but had to be shot nearer to winter so to avoid the actors breaths showing on camera, they all had to suck on ice cubes between takes. Fair play to them
loonatic7 2 years ago
So If I get this right the remake has lost the whole religious point of view? Is Cage's character a Christian?
MissMael 2 years ago
@MissMael No, he's not.
uayfb1 1 year ago
why is the broken leg part always edited out?
terrenceh77 2 years ago
@terrenceh77 :-D what do you mean, was there a broken leg part in the 1973 version?
Blogofanclub 1 year ago
Proof that horror direction can't be ham-fisted like that. The reveal of the wicker man itself in the original is as chilling as anything I've ever seen because it's so delicate and restrained. All the horror is filtered through Woodward's fantastic performance. But the remake might as well have neon signs around its wicker man saying, "Boo!" Also the original is actually about something whereas the remake is just a bad episode of The Twilight Zone. When will Hollywood understand this?
TulseLuper 2 years ago
Why would anyone remake a film of such incredible quality?
Again and again the stupidity and greed of Hollywood astounds me.
TheAntiPleb 2 years ago
Yeh I defo agree! Also if they could get actual fans along side production of movie sbased on games then they would suck a lot less!
Rokyku 2 years ago
Interesting comparison. Good job. I liked how the wicker man looked in the re-make, but that was all I liked about it. The original is a masterpiece, the remake is carp. If ya know what I mean.
gb42760ad1972 3 years ago
I'd rather not have that annoying christian guy.
Nicholas Cage IS AWESOME
OH GAWD NOT THE BEEES
Chrono355 3 years ago
your an idiot. He added so much power to the movie because it was christianity vs paganism. Despite Nic being the greatest actor in the universe, he just yelled bloody murder the whole time.
digitizer 3 years ago
At least he punched some bitches in the face.
chris371 3 years ago
That he did...
WLPowell 2 years ago
1973 version - Good. 2006 remake - Poor.
SPeacock 3 years ago