Wallace's reference to bushes bipartisan commission made a mistake and everything they concluded based on their mistaken is also mistaken. and every reference relying their findings is also mistaken.
Profanity is the surest signs of unintelligence. If you have never read from what I can tell the material associated with The FairTax. The FairTax would strength the middle class and the lower class and bring jobs back to the US.
What is the difference between you buying yourself a loaf of bread and government buying one for you? Besides the fact that you pay the government to buy the loaf of bread, nothing. You consume it either way, and both you and government currently pay the embedded cost of income capital gain, corporate income and other taxes.
Exempting government consumption will cause every one to ask the government to give them everything.
Fairtax is a fucking farce -- its a fucking pile of shit. These fuckers have a MASSIVE new tax on cities and states dumb fuck. They hide that in the fine print dumb fuck.
Fairtax math is BASED on getting this massive tax FROM the government. ITs that fucking bogus.
Fairtax won't even have a hearing under oath dumb fuck, cause they KNOW its pure fucking bullshit.
Yes, revenue would drop like a rock dumb fuck, you got that right.
Imagine a group. where each chips in 22% of his income to pay for things important to the group. one year the group decided they need a bridge. Among them are some bridge builders who bid on the project. One is awarded the contract, builds the bridge, and is payed upon completion. 22% of the cost of the bridge is embedded income tax, and counts in this years tax receipts.
The fairtax just replaces an income tax, with a revenue neutral sales tax.
I will tell you whats funny -- Fairtax pretending the government can pay itselt 1.5 trillion dollas by making the government write itself checks for sales taxes on things it buys.
Do you ever fucking wonder why Fairtax avoids congressional hearings?
DO you ever fucking wonder why no major corporation -- in 13 years -- has said one nice word about this plan?
Here is a clue - real economist know this is a fucking joke -- and that's why it has gone into a shit hole.
no it never makes it to the floor becuse it puts too much power in the peoples hands, if the government dose something we dont agree with all we have to do is stop buying things, government revenues would drop like a rock, thats why it never makes it, there more money in taking what we earn than what we spend, and they know that, now our government is so massive, it will never happen
The Fairtax is a bunch of crap, and it's own leaders know it. Its dead -- its fizzled out ----except for a few goonie dumb asses.
The only fucking way Fairtax numbers "work" you dumb ass, is if Fairtax can create 1.5 trillion dollars out of thin air, by pretending to tax the government.
Thats exactly what the Fairtax does -- look at Fairtax Book, page 148 "The federal government will become a MAJOR taxpayer"
Wallace didn't correct Huckabee on anything. The commission Wallace cites did not do an apples-to-apples evaluation of the FairTax. It's very easy to come up w/different #'s on the FairTax when you completely & fundamentally change its constructs.
Rothbard says it best, "It is no crime to be ignorant of economics...but it is totally irresponsible to have a loud & vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance."
Fairtax is pure BS -- what part of Fairtax pretends to get 1.5 trillion in sales tax FROM the government, by a TAX on the government.
If you can make the federal government pay a sales tax - why not make it an income tax? Make government just pay itself an income tax. Its exactly as rational.
BD, thank you for showing us all the error of our ways!
LOL...your tactics are so transparent it's laughable. It's 1 thing not to support the FairTax, but there are only 2 reasons to blatantly lie about it...either you are completely ignorant of the topic, or you benefit from the current corrupt system & are frightened beyond belief @ what the FairTax represents. If your reason is the former, study up - you'll thank yourself. If it's the latter, your bound for disappointment.
Which hurts more: I have $100 and pay 23% of that on goods or you have $1000 and spend 23%? All things considered, you still end up with more money than I do and I am actually hurt by paying the same tax rate as someone who has much more of a "comfort zone" to begin with.
The end up with more money because they made more money. When you make more money than you do today, you too will end up with more money. The prebate that everyone gets is a much larger % to your income than it is to the rich man's also. The rich guy just paid 10 times more than you in taxes. The FairTax will give you more money. When you buy a used car, you pay nothing in taxes on it.
But the reality is this: 23% tax on a good bought by someone who makes $28,000 a year (a recent college graduate for example) impacts the wallet more than a 23% tax on a good bought by someone who make $2,000,000. 23% with less money to begin with = less money to spend on other goods.
Interestingly, a person who makes $2,000,000 a year gets taxed 27% of their income. A person who makes $20,000 a year gets taxed only 17% of their income.
A Fair Tax is nothing but a Flat Tax; except, it gives Wall Street and Business Fat Cats a method of hiding their income from being taxed. By investing their income, they never pay their share of the tax.
Furthermore, people who don't have incomes (homeless etc) now have to pay a tax. They won't get rebates due to a lack of address.
Homeless don't by products to begin with. But the working poor with addresses will get the rebate on essential products such as produce. people will be more likely to save money since the price of goods will increase, creating a more stable society and market place. And above all, the government will stop stealing your money every April 15. People now have more control over their own income. And once people realize the stability of the system it will be easy to privatize social security.
Fairtax is a farce, a complete bullshit farce. For example, the tax rate would have to be at least 57% -- according to independent studies by leading economist. Thats a 57% tax on cancer surgery, on nursing home patients, even on rent and insurance premiums.
Yes --the idiot farce would tax all medical cost, all rent, all insurance premiums.
How the hell would the parents of a child with leukemia pay 60,000 in sales tax on their 150,000 dollar medical bill.
The queer bank who put up this video is a moron. He/she didn't show Huckabee's reasoning after the other guy on fox spoke. This must be a Hillary fan.
Denim, poor guy. Yes raitings or poor. I just want to plant the truth trees all over this forrest of lies. Later, if this passes, and it all turns to merde, you cant say you had no idea.
Yes - notice the FT would have to be much higher JUST TO REPLACE INCOME TAX. Not 23-- but 34. That was JUST for income tax replacement. Now -- they claim that same 23 replaces income, AND corp, AND FICA, AND inheritance, AND gift. Its just looooooney boys.
Don't you see that this really only benefits the wealthy lobbyists and upper class from paying those high income and property taxes on their million dollar homes and million dollar incomes?
Huckabee isnt even close. The FT has to be MUCH higher than 23%, as group after group will get exemptions (nursing homes, cancer hosptials, the pentagon). Plus, this could destroy American car companies, by making Ford and GM raise their prices 4000 dollars, with only 500 dollars offset by embedded taxes.
You can have this one Mark. Nobody watches it anyway. Notice the poor rating? I flagged it as spam and I hope everyone else will too. Keep looking, you might find one or two places where you can spread your spam.
Looks like another hit on the middle and lower class. Think about it, If you tax a gallon of gas who does it affect the most? People who make $100, $200, $300.000 thousand a year? What percentage of their income goes to consumable taxable products? If a tomato costs $6 does that hurt you or them?
Another Liberal Neocon! Hey hucky.. raise the taxes as much as you can while you let out all the criminals too! Then overseas we can have a war everywhere! Stupid MORON from arkysauce!
That's a cheap shot. You clearly edited the video for political purposes. Wallace was wrong, he based his "corrections" on misconceptions and Huckabee corrected him on the original interview. Dirty shame I tell ya.
Denim -- you need to learn the law of unintended consequences, bro. Your comment about the "low ratings" of these forums, got me thinking. Now I found better places to spread the truth -- in bigger forests of lies. Thanks bro, you are a pal.
Maybe so, I didnt see original. I know the news can edit out truth easily. But FT edits out truth too. LIke the truth --that all outside economist have had vastly different numbers on what the rate would be. That some economist say it be 57%. Given that many groups will get exemptions, the rate will go above 50%.
that comes from Bruce Bartlett, who also said the Fairtax comes from the church of scientology. It comes from two Houston businessmen, Leo Linbeck and Rober McNair, and the book was written by Neal Boortz, agnostic, and John Linder, Protestant. His research is horribly flawed and easily debunked.
I made a mistake in the previous post in cutting it down to fit. Instead of "Huckabee's response, he must not have had one." I meant to say that your video portrays Gov. Huckabee as not having a response when he did. You should be ashamed.
Cutting Huckabee off just before he corrects Wallace makes your argument empty at best and deceptive or even worse. Gov. Huckabee corrected Wallace. It is the people who want to be rid of the IRS and oppressive non-representative taxation. The FairTax is NOT Gov. Huckabee's plan. Wallace needs to get the origin right. Huckabee's response, he must not have had one. Either add Gov. Huckabee's response of remove this deceptive video.
You cut Mike Huckabee off and didn't show his response. President Bush's advisory panel didn't look at the Fair Tax proposal but made up its own tax. If you read Kotlikoff et al, "What Rate Works?" you will see that the 23% rate remains viable to replace the revenues administered today by the IRS, and the rate remains virtually unchanged over a 10-year period.
Chris Wallace was incorrect because the Presidential Commission used the wrong tax base assumption. Mike Huckabee, it is clear, was about to respond. In the New Hampshire debate Mike Huckabee did respond with the correct answer.
Huckabee responded to this and he put wallace in his place and shared his responce to the critics.. of course the fair tax would work.. but some politians don't want it because they enjoy rippin us off..
We need to elect Mike Huckabee and put that stupid IRS out of business!
The FairTax is 23% tax inclusive. That means out of a $100 dollar good, $23 goes to the government. That could be looked at as a 30% sales tax, ie a $77 good plus a 30% tax of $23. The President's panel says 34%, which is very close. Difference is, I believe they did what the Brookings institute did and exempted a lot of products from the tax, which drives the rate up. It's not apples to apples. Go FairTax!
The Tax reform commission and other critics say that the tax would have to be 34% even up to 50% to raise the amount of taxes to fund the current government---duh--wake up--if that was the case then that is what we are paying now! I believe the scholors and economists research over the political based commission panel anyway!
What a great example of how to edit a clip to make something look bad. If you don't like FairTax, it's because you're a social engineer or you're a paid lobbyist. 'Nuf said.
Wallace's reference to bushes bipartisan commission made a mistake and everything they concluded based on their mistaken is also mistaken. and every reference relying their findings is also mistaken.
Wallace's argument is built on a house of cards.
dtvgmedia 10 months ago
Profanity is the surest signs of unintelligence. If you have never read from what I can tell the material associated with The FairTax. The FairTax would strength the middle class and the lower class and bring jobs back to the US.
kentharrisgeorgia 1 year ago
You SHOULD recognize Fairtax as a fucking ball of shit without a committe tellling your dumb fucking ass.
Here is some clues its pure fucking bullshit.
1) It pretends to get most of its revenue FROM the government by taxing the government a sales tax.
So tell me -- how many countries on fucking earth tax their own government to get most of their money?
2) They will put the HIGHEST SALES TAX ON EARTH - but prices will go DOWN.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12FlyMe and your 35 other youtube aliases
What is the difference between you buying yourself a loaf of bread and government buying one for you? Besides the fact that you pay the government to buy the loaf of bread, nothing. You consume it either way, and both you and government currently pay the embedded cost of income capital gain, corporate income and other taxes.
Exempting government consumption will cause every one to ask the government to give them everything.
dtvgmedia 10 months ago
Wow a commission appointed by bush I trust them. You have swayed me now.
rollateaparty 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
rollateaparty 2 years ago
Power to the people my ass dumb fuck.
Fairtax is a fucking farce -- its a fucking pile of shit. These fuckers have a MASSIVE new tax on cities and states dumb fuck. They hide that in the fine print dumb fuck.
Fairtax math is BASED on getting this massive tax FROM the government. ITs that fucking bogus.
Fairtax won't even have a hearing under oath dumb fuck, cause they KNOW its pure fucking bullshit.
Yes, revenue would drop like a rock dumb fuck, you got that right.
BullshipDetector 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Marc, consider income taxes are like this.
Imagine a group. where each chips in 22% of his income to pay for things important to the group. one year the group decided they need a bridge. Among them are some bridge builders who bid on the project. One is awarded the contract, builds the bridge, and is payed upon completion. 22% of the cost of the bridge is embedded income tax, and counts in this years tax receipts.
The fairtax just replaces an income tax, with a revenue neutral sales tax.
dtvgmedia 2 years ago
I'm sure we'll all take your word for it you sound like a respectable jackass.
rollateaparty 2 years ago
I will tell you whats funny -- Fairtax pretending the government can pay itselt 1.5 trillion dollas by making the government write itself checks for sales taxes on things it buys.
Do you ever fucking wonder why Fairtax avoids congressional hearings?
DO you ever fucking wonder why no major corporation -- in 13 years -- has said one nice word about this plan?
Here is a clue - real economist know this is a fucking joke -- and that's why it has gone into a shit hole.
BullshipDetector 2 years ago
no it never makes it to the floor becuse it puts too much power in the peoples hands, if the government dose something we dont agree with all we have to do is stop buying things, government revenues would drop like a rock, thats why it never makes it, there more money in taking what we earn than what we spend, and they know that, now our government is so massive, it will never happen
nomad2081 2 years ago
The Fairtax is a bunch of crap, and it's own leaders know it. Its dead -- its fizzled out ----except for a few goonie dumb asses.
The only fucking way Fairtax numbers "work" you dumb ass, is if Fairtax can create 1.5 trillion dollars out of thin air, by pretending to tax the government.
Thats exactly what the Fairtax does -- look at Fairtax Book, page 148 "The federal government will become a MAJOR taxpayer"
Fairtax is not going anywhere. Its dead.
Google Fairtax absurdity.
12FlyMe 2 years ago
Wallace didn't correct Huckabee on anything. The commission Wallace cites did not do an apples-to-apples evaluation of the FairTax. It's very easy to come up w/different #'s on the FairTax when you completely & fundamentally change its constructs.
Rothbard says it best, "It is no crime to be ignorant of economics...but it is totally irresponsible to have a loud & vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance."
Schitzngrins 2 years ago 2
Fairtax is pure BS -- what part of Fairtax pretends to get 1.5 trillion in sales tax FROM the government, by a TAX on the government.
If you can make the federal government pay a sales tax - why not make it an income tax? Make government just pay itself an income tax. Its exactly as rational.
BullshipDetector 2 years ago
BD, thank you for showing us all the error of our ways!
LOL...your tactics are so transparent it's laughable. It's 1 thing not to support the FairTax, but there are only 2 reasons to blatantly lie about it...either you are completely ignorant of the topic, or you benefit from the current corrupt system & are frightened beyond belief @ what the FairTax represents. If your reason is the former, study up - you'll thank yourself. If it's the latter, your bound for disappointment.
Schitzngrins 2 years ago
Funny how this video cuts off before Huckabee can respond and tell Wallace why what he said is wrong.
jboritzki 2 years ago
Dont believe a fuching word this shit saleman says.
Fairtax only works if its possible to make the government pay over a trillion dollar in sales tax -- TO ITSELF.
IF that doesnt fucking work --- and it doesn -- the Fairtax is pure bullshit.
Fairtax is a magic fucking pony that shits gold. It pure bullshit.
Yes it sounds great - -but real math shows a national sales tax to replace all others would be OVER 60%.
Not fucking 23 ding bat.
It only 23 if gov can pay itself.
BullshipDetector 2 years ago
BullshipDetector probably works for the IRS and don't want to lose his job. He likes taking your money and getting paid to do so.
jboritzki 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No dumb ass - the government does NOT collect a trillion dollars in sales taxes from itself -- in that or any other way you moron.
You dumb asses who think Fairtax is a Magic Pony that shits gold, are just dumber than fuch.
I suppose its understandable you are foold by FT bullshit -- after all, they hide their bullshit.
But I have pointed their bullshit out to you dufus. I showed you their crap trick.
One trick -- pretending to tax the government.
Its pure bullshit you dumbax
BullshipDetector 2 years ago
why did you cut the video off??? huckabee comes back and corrects wallace
proxythorobred 2 years ago
Which hurts more: I have $100 and pay 23% of that on goods or you have $1000 and spend 23%? All things considered, you still end up with more money than I do and I am actually hurt by paying the same tax rate as someone who has much more of a "comfort zone" to begin with.
MagnesDrachen13 3 years ago
The end up with more money because they made more money. When you make more money than you do today, you too will end up with more money. The prebate that everyone gets is a much larger % to your income than it is to the rich man's also. The rich guy just paid 10 times more than you in taxes. The FairTax will give you more money. When you buy a used car, you pay nothing in taxes on it.
jboritzki 2 years ago
But the reality is this: 23% tax on a good bought by someone who makes $28,000 a year (a recent college graduate for example) impacts the wallet more than a 23% tax on a good bought by someone who make $2,000,000. 23% with less money to begin with = less money to spend on other goods.
MagnesDrachen13 3 years ago
Come on.. You didnt give huckabee a chance to respond.
He has said it is 23%.
12oink12 3 years ago
Interestingly, a person who makes $2,000,000 a year gets taxed 27% of their income. A person who makes $20,000 a year gets taxed only 17% of their income.
A Fair Tax is nothing but a Flat Tax; except, it gives Wall Street and Business Fat Cats a method of hiding their income from being taxed. By investing their income, they never pay their share of the tax.
Furthermore, people who don't have incomes (homeless etc) now have to pay a tax. They won't get rebates due to a lack of address.
Rearah 3 years ago
Homeless don't by products to begin with. But the working poor with addresses will get the rebate on essential products such as produce. people will be more likely to save money since the price of goods will increase, creating a more stable society and market place. And above all, the government will stop stealing your money every April 15. People now have more control over their own income. And once people realize the stability of the system it will be easy to privatize social security.
TimeWarp66 3 years ago
Fairtax is a farce, a complete bullshit farce. For example, the tax rate would have to be at least 57% -- according to independent studies by leading economist. Thats a 57% tax on cancer surgery, on nursing home patients, even on rent and insurance premiums.
Yes --the idiot farce would tax all medical cost, all rent, all insurance premiums.
How the hell would the parents of a child with leukemia pay 60,000 in sales tax on their 150,000 dollar medical bill.
Its just goofy as hell.
MarkDouglasC 3 years ago
His response to Huckabee was incorrect and Huckabee's response was cut out. Hmmm... perhaps this comes from an IRS employee?
chwparker 3 years ago
HAHA! Smackdown on Huckabee. He's the only Republican loony enough to support the Fair Tax.
Whoo69 4 years ago
We did not hear his response!
JohnZaun 4 years ago 2
The queer bank who put up this video is a moron. He/she didn't show Huckabee's reasoning after the other guy on fox spoke. This must be a Hillary fan.
IB6UB9now 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Denim, poor guy. Yes raitings or poor. I just want to plant the truth trees all over this forrest of lies. Later, if this passes, and it all turns to merde, you cant say you had no idea.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes - notice the FT would have to be much higher JUST TO REPLACE INCOME TAX. Not 23-- but 34. That was JUST for income tax replacement. Now -- they claim that same 23 replaces income, AND corp, AND FICA, AND inheritance, AND gift. Its just looooooney boys.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Don't you see that this really only benefits the wealthy lobbyists and upper class from paying those high income and property taxes on their million dollar homes and million dollar incomes?
XionXXXX 4 years ago
A little biased aren't you Robertshaw? Why didn't you run the whole video? Chris Wallace was wrong and Huckabee corrected him.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Huckabee isnt even close. The FT has to be MUCH higher than 23%, as group after group will get exemptions (nursing homes, cancer hosptials, the pentagon). Plus, this could destroy American car companies, by making Ford and GM raise their prices 4000 dollars, with only 500 dollars offset by embedded taxes.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
You can have this one Mark. Nobody watches it anyway. Notice the poor rating? I flagged it as spam and I hope everyone else will too. Keep looking, you might find one or two places where you can spread your spam.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
Looks like another hit on the middle and lower class. Think about it, If you tax a gallon of gas who does it affect the most? People who make $100, $200, $300.000 thousand a year? What percentage of their income goes to consumable taxable products? If a tomato costs $6 does that hurt you or them?
lv2ndamendment 4 years ago
Another Liberal Neocon! Hey hucky.. raise the taxes as much as you can while you let out all the criminals too! Then overseas we can have a war everywhere! Stupid MORON from arkysauce!
hummtide 4 years ago
That's a cheap shot. You clearly edited the video for political purposes. Wallace was wrong, he based his "corrections" on misconceptions and Huckabee corrected him on the original interview. Dirty shame I tell ya.
jbosso79 4 years ago 2
I flagged this message as spam and I hope you will too. Not only is it biased, he cut the best part of the video out.
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Denim -- you need to learn the law of unintended consequences, bro. Your comment about the "low ratings" of these forums, got me thinking. Now I found better places to spread the truth -- in bigger forests of lies. Thanks bro, you are a pal.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Maybe so, I didnt see original. I know the news can edit out truth easily. But FT edits out truth too. LIke the truth --that all outside economist have had vastly different numbers on what the rate would be. That some economist say it be 57%. Given that many groups will get exemptions, the rate will go above 50%.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
For those that want to see the full unedited version for the truth:
watch?v=zgc-R9iAWhg
denimblueindigo 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
denim -- you cant post links. But then, you need a little help in math and logic too. Im glad to be of assistance.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
that comes from Bruce Bartlett, who also said the Fairtax comes from the church of scientology. It comes from two Houston businessmen, Leo Linbeck and Rober McNair, and the book was written by Neal Boortz, agnostic, and John Linder, Protestant. His research is horribly flawed and easily debunked.
chwparker 3 years ago
I made a mistake in the previous post in cutting it down to fit. Instead of "Huckabee's response, he must not have had one." I meant to say that your video portrays Gov. Huckabee as not having a response when he did. You should be ashamed.
issuesandtruth 4 years ago
Cutting Huckabee off just before he corrects Wallace makes your argument empty at best and deceptive or even worse. Gov. Huckabee corrected Wallace. It is the people who want to be rid of the IRS and oppressive non-representative taxation. The FairTax is NOT Gov. Huckabee's plan. Wallace needs to get the origin right. Huckabee's response, he must not have had one. Either add Gov. Huckabee's response of remove this deceptive video.
issuesandtruth 4 years ago
You cut Mike Huckabee off and didn't show his response. President Bush's advisory panel didn't look at the Fair Tax proposal but made up its own tax. If you read Kotlikoff et al, "What Rate Works?" you will see that the 23% rate remains viable to replace the revenues administered today by the IRS, and the rate remains virtually unchanged over a 10-year period.
~Jim Bennett
Summit NJ
jbennettatty 4 years ago 2
This video post is totally irresponsible. Next time, run the full clip or don't run it at all.
jodale1972 4 years ago 5
Chris Wallace was incorrect because the Presidential Commission used the wrong tax base assumption. Mike Huckabee, it is clear, was about to respond. In the New Hampshire debate Mike Huckabee did respond with the correct answer.
jbennettatty 4 years ago 3
The video self-survingly cuts off Huckabee's response.
phil4dar 4 years ago 3
Because then he couldn't use that catchy title.
Hazen357 4 years ago
Huckabee responded to this and he put wallace in his place and shared his responce to the critics.. of course the fair tax would work.. but some politians don't want it because they enjoy rippin us off..
We need to elect Mike Huckabee and put that stupid IRS out of business!
oOPepsiLoverOo 4 years ago
The FairTax is 23% tax inclusive. That means out of a $100 dollar good, $23 goes to the government. That could be looked at as a 30% sales tax, ie a $77 good plus a 30% tax of $23. The President's panel says 34%, which is very close. Difference is, I believe they did what the Brookings institute did and exempted a lot of products from the tax, which drives the rate up. It's not apples to apples. Go FairTax!
cphine 4 years ago
Wallace is absolutely wrong. Huckabee is correct. Bush's commitee exploring the Fair Tax is also wrong.
jgu80 4 years ago 2
Nice edit Michael Moore
noth98 4 years ago 2
whhaaaaaa!!!! Its fixed news so who gives a $hit!
hummtide 4 years ago
The Tax reform commission and other critics say that the tax would have to be 34% even up to 50% to raise the amount of taxes to fund the current government---duh--wake up--if that was the case then that is what we are paying now! I believe the scholors and economists research over the political based commission panel anyway!
FairTaxman 4 years ago 2
If you want to read the rest of it, here is the transcript. foxnews dot com/story/0,2933,275734,00.html
growson 4 years ago
What a great example of how to edit a clip to make something look bad. If you don't like FairTax, it's because you're a social engineer or you're a paid lobbyist. 'Nuf said.
turtletoenail 4 years ago 2
In the interest of fairness, why didn't you show Huckabee's response?
HuckabeeForPresident 4 years ago
foxnews (dot) com/video2/launchPage.html?052707/052707_fns_huckabee&Mike%20Huckabee%20on%20%27FNS%27&FNS&GOP%20presidential%20candidate%20discusses%20his%20stances%20on%20the%20big%20topics&Politics&-1&Mike%20Huckabee%20on%20%27FNS%27&Video%20Launch%20Page&News
growson 4 years ago