David Barton's Biased History

[BluntRapture]

The democratic party we know today was NOT the Dem party of yesteryear. In those days, it was filled with right-leaning southern conservatives who wanted to keep their racist slave mongering way of life alive. That's who started the KKK. The parties have evolved greatly. Nowadays, Dems are known for being liberal, intelligent, and open-minded, while the Republicans have become the opposite of what they once were and are close-minded, intolerant, selfish, and mean.

[Srekwah]

The Titanic had more integrity than any leftist politician I've ever had the misfortune to know the name of anywhere around the world.

[nsdtr01]

the klan was started by conservatives who happened to be democrats

[jeffreywjohnston]

This guy is nuts! Can you not see how he has twisted the truth? This guy doesn't even believe in evolution! The right wing (at one point it was the democrats and now it is the republicans) has always tried to centralize their power. This consists of keeping minorities down, and using religion to pacify the pathetic and ignorant.

[Ragfish]

If slavery were the issue, it is amazing how blacks and folks concerned about humanitarian values are drawn to their oppressors. Maybe it's a Stockholm syndrome in mass application. Straight party Democrat voting is almost as appalling as affections for all things MUSLIM. In the history of the slave trade, ISLAM was responsible for slavery in Africa. The overwhelming majority of captured slaves were caught and sold within the Uma!

[lindaclements]

He's an historian. You may hate him but then you hate history.

The Democrats have ALWAYS been behind slavery. the dolts stick their heads in the sand, but facts are facts. Listen to the OPEN LETTER TO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY (NBRA) National Black Republican Association Ret. Lt. Col. Frances Rice

She wrote a letter DEMANDING an apology from the Democrat Party for keeping them THEN and keeping them NOW in slavery.....

Type in the YouTube search box:

watch?v=xYaU-_unAk8

[romansten9]

Thanks David Barton. The people that say things against you have no case. You can't argue with the original documents that you have in your possession. The only revisionists are those that have tried to twist history in the recent past. They need to go to the source as you have. Again, you can't argue with the founding fathers own statements about their faith in God. You're right, people like to quote 3 founding fathers and they ignore the 180 (or so) others.

[FmrUSMCRnTX]

It's a great video, and it's all true! Look at what's going on in our country today! WAKE UP, AMERICA! God Bless and Keep America Free! Semper Fi!

[georges255]

Thank you for sharing these important facts from David Barton. I have lived through much of this history, and his description is accurate.

[BarthBunzel]

This moron makes me puke, the Klan and the redneck Southerners, democrat or not, were also very religious. The Klan had religious motifs and was tied to many baptist and other fundy churches. Yes the people who started the Klan were also Democrats because most Southerners were back then, now their progeny are all bible brainwashed cons

[tubularguynine]

@BarthBunzel - I'd rather be brainwashed by a Christian than a closet Muslim, fake POTUS.

[BarthBunzel]

@tubularguynine You truly are brainwashed because there is not much to clean there. This has nothing to do with Obama, but since you are a maroon who listens to talk radio, that kind of random outburst is common for that species. The Democrats are the forerunners of the Nazis? As if your worthless uneducated childish comment needs to be rebutted. Wasn't slavery there from Day 1 of the USA as well as those Southerners were fundamentalist Christian dimwits like you?

[tubularguynine]

@BarthBunzel - "Wasn't slavery there from Day 1 of the USA as well as those Southerners were fundamentalist Christian dimwits like you?" (I guess 138-140 IS dimwitted when compared to Einstein's 160 or James Wood's 180)

[tubularguynine]

@BarthBunzel - "This has nothing to do with Obama..." - This has EVERYTHING to do with him. Videos like these are expressly used to draw attention to BHO's love of the oh so peaceful religion of Islam and his utter contempt of anything else, even going so far as having crosses removed from stages where he will be speaking. He's probably afraid he'll burst into flames like Dracula if he gets too close to one.

[BarthBunzel]

@tubularguynine Where is your proof for your crackpot conspiracy, up your ass with your head? He spent years in a church full of crosses, you low grade imbecile.

[BarthBunzel]

Yeah, and things have reversed themselves over the last century, but judging from the comments from the smug stupid little theo-cons here, they haven't noticed yet. Anyone who pretends that Barton's right wing Xtian propaganda is some legit history is a fool. i bet they admire Beck too

[stevemanusa]

Very sad that the RightWingWatch can actually quote all the FACTS and call it Biased... this goes way beyond stupidity on the part of the liberal "right - wing - watch"... how sad. David Barton's Information in this video is Excellent!

[lknbrwn]

IF ITS BIASED, WHY AREN'T THE FACTS REFUTED? He states the facts. They are true...what's your point? Care to refute the facts? If you can't, why the accusation of bias?

[sharonanony]

YES THEY will ANSWER TO GOD. &WE KNOW ALL WHITE SENATES AND ALL WHITE GOVERNORS, FOR 100 YEARS. Have Nothing to do with ANY PEON OF EQUALITY. Thus all WHITE SENATORS, ELECTED Obama through the Electoral college.SO WHITE PEOPLE ELECTED OBAMA, AND CONTINUE TO BLAME BLACKS WHO CANT EVEN ELECT UNDER THE PROGRESSIVE MAJAORITY SHAM,GOVENORS. THE CONSTITUTION IS REPUBLIC. NOT THE MAJORITY DICTATES. BUT THIS IS WHAT WHITES DID, AND they have Blood on their hands after Slavery for Black infant mortality

[BarthBunzel]

@sharonanony what are you ranting about? The electoral college just votes the way the state voted

[momofour]

Hey, stratocasterz-do some research-Lee opposed slavery. Hello? What's your point? Where's the foundation for the accusation that THIS is the 're-written' history?

[tsrox20]

Now let us look at politics today: republicans thrive in the south and they are typically anti big government and pro business while democrats dominate the north and are pro government and anti big business....funny....seems like the roles are reversed...you take a democrat from the 1800s and have him vote today, he'd vote republican...all that happened were the party policy's switched sides...so 1800s "democrats" were just ancient forms of modern republicans.

[tubularguynine]

@tsrox20 - no, 1800s Democrats were forerunners of the Nazis.

[BarthBunzel]

@tubularguynine You are too much of a moron to comprehend Godwin's Law. But if real Nazis came around today, you would be the first to sign up so you can get your spiffy uniform and guns and go beat on all the bad people.

[tubularguynine]

@BarthBunzel - Look no further for the new Nazis than O'Barry and his "...civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." Ummm-ummm, smells like SS to me.

[BarthBunzel]

@tubularguynine Yeah, right. I'll add paranoid delusions to your list of flaws along with gullibility & dishonesty.

[tsrox20]

Apparently people don't realize that the "Democrats" of the 1800's were pro state's rights and anti big government. The vast majority of "democrat" congresmen and senators were from the southern states while the whigs and early republican party members were from the north.

[tsrox20]

@tsrox20 Now let us look at politics today: republicans thrive in the south and they are typically anti big government and pro business while democrats dominate the north and are pro government and anti big business....funny....seems like the roles are reversed...you take a democrat from the 1800s and have him vote today, he'd vote republican...all that happened were the party policy's switched sides...so 1800s "democrats" were just ancient forms of modern republicans.

[lesh2000]

Barton, sly dog, "Democrat controlled Supreme Court made Dred Scott decision" but he doesn't mention a Republican Supreme Court passed Roe v Wade

[bdjennings]

Keep up the good work!

[jasrogg]

the first thing slave owners taught slaves to read was the bible guys like barton want to return to the good old days thus there obsession with slavery

[dechet44]

Well when you think civil rights Martin Luther King Jr. comes to mind. Was he a Dem. or Rep. ?

[Mutedvox]

david barton = charlatan = historical distortion = lies no credible historian puts any stock in barton's rewriting of history and religion.

[stratocasterz]

What's the point of this video other than to illustrate that a long time ago the republicans were the progressive party and the democrats were the conservative party?

Is the rebel flag a democratic invention? Was Robert E Lee a dem?

[RottingintheMidwest]

the racist slavery supporting democrats of the 19th century changed parties in the 20th century. wow, dave barton is a moron.

[Freedom4Tennessee]

Watchdog riiiiiiiight !

[9pt9]

Pure historical facts. Cant you see Barton is trying to save america by understanding the past? Know history or no future.

[Syrinx69]

Totally biased and lies. Slavery was supported by CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS who used the Bible (the world's finest slave-owner's manual) to back up their beliefs. LIBERALS have always been the ones fighting for freedom in justice in this country. All our rights and freedoms we enjoy today were won FROM THE GRIPS of Judeo-Christian principles by liberal patriots.

[Mordeer1]

Your problem is with Jesus Christ! You have ears but can't hear and eyes but you can't see.

[bRizzle2009100]

everything he said in the video was true. i dont see any problem with that at all....

[gaums]

Democrats = KKK = Southern = Republicans today

[gatekeeper96740]

This is great and David's collection of ORIGINAL docs is awesome!

[TheCobaltAgent]

@scatcoitus ... REALLY? The Confederates WERE Democrats. The entire CSA was run by Democrats. Every member of the legislatures during secession, Houses and Senates, were Democrats. Their President Jefferson Davis and even vice president were all Democrats. Instead of relying on this chopped up edited vid, watch the documentary by Burton on here titled "Setting The Record Straight: America's History in Black & White" it's twelve 9-10 minute long videos, and it'll knock you on your ass.

[Airgead99]

Who are the LEFTWING Watchdogs?

[Mutedvox]

barton just can't seem to get the truth through those lips of his. Jefferson and his supporters called themselves "Democratic Republicans", emphasis on republican. they were also known as the Jeffersonian Republicans. very different from his twisted view. re-writing history is a bitch when you don't remember what lie you're on. then the republicans became the prejudiced, the bigoted, the proud when they took over in the south and supported slavery in all of it's oppressive forms. yayyy!!!!

[Vlaxitov]

This isn't biased, it's fact. You might not personally agree with these things but it was the democrat party's agenda. It is history.

[Mycos1]

Barton's failure to mention that the two parties have since adopted each others social attitudes, with the right-wing party then (the DNC) becoming the more left of the two now and vice-versa re: the RNC, is also the overarching method through which he distorts American history inn general. In short, he's a psychopath and a liar who has found a willing group of followers in American right-wing (authoritarian) Christians.

[TheCobaltAgent]

@Mycos1 That's a bold-faced lie. The idea that the GOP and DNC magically switched social attitudes just because their power bases *slowly* shifted in the north and south is completely idiotic. The original Republican platform from 1856 was as conservative as you could get. It supported gun rights, originalist judges in the courts, and firmly opposed slavery and POLYGAMY. Polygamy was then was homosexuality is today. So slavery and sexual immorality were "twin relics of barbarism." Seriously...

[Mycos1]

@TheCobaltAgent Not the brightest bulb in the box are you?

Republican Party : First opposition political party in the United States. "Organized in 1792 as the Republican Party, its members held power nationally between 1801 and 1825. It was the direct antecedent of the present Democratic Party."

[Mycos1]

@Mycos1 That's from Encyclopedia Britannica. Or do you think they too have been infiltrated by "commie libruls" who have nothing better to do with their time than make up lies to tell conservatives eg. universities and press?

[TheCobaltAgent]

@Mycos1 That was the Democratic-Republican Party of Jefferson, you dipshit. It was a completely different party and ceased to exist.

The Democratic Republicans broke up after the Era of Good Feelings produced infighting. Andrew Jackson created the Democratic Party from half of Jefferson's party, and the remainders of the party founded the National Republican Party. They were around only a few years, then merged with others into the Whig Party. The Whigs merged with others to become the GOP.

[TheCobaltAgent]

Democratic-Republicans (Jefferson) and Federalists (Adams)

Federalists die off, Age of Good Feelings, infighting

Democratic (founded by Jackson), National Republican (anti-Jacksonian)

Democrats still strong, N. Republicans die off and replaced by Whigs

Democrats still around, Whigs divided on slavery and along with many third parties form the Republican Party we know today.

Democratic-Republican > Democratic

Democratic-Republican and Federalist > National Republicans > Whigs > Republicans

[TheCobaltAgent]

The truth is that both parties have their origin in Jefferson. Democratic-Republican Party wasn't either current party. The Democratic Party today wasn't founded by Jefferson, but by Jackson. And The Republican Party also has its roots in Jefferson, but its was Whigs, Democrats, Free Soilers and others that founded it in its current form.

Both parties can trace their roots to the Democratic-Republican Party though because after the collapse of the Federalist Party, Democratic-Republicans split.

[TheCobaltAgent]

So the Democrats were actually the party of Jackson, not Jefferson. This is reflected kind of silently. Jackson was a supporter of capitalism and a war hawk and a patriot and war hero. However, like other Democrats he railed against bankers, supported slavery, used populist rhetoric and celebrity status to ride into power, and opposed checks and balances in the Constitution like the Electoral College purely because it was inconvenient politically and cost him the presidency his first try.

[TheCobaltAgent]

What are Democrats doing today? Well they're complaining about banks and trying to take them over, they're enslaving us through collectivism and statism and openly supported race-based policies well into the end of the 20th century, they're using populist economic rhetoric and demonizing unpopular targets like Wall Street, corporations, et al and used celebrity power to win in '08, and they're still making a big stink about the Electoral College because their boy Gore lost to Bush.

[TheCobaltAgent]

The parties are still the same parties. Sure, there have been some realignments over a few centuries regarding economic policies, sure. When has anyone mentioned bimetallism, free silver, etc? But overall despite changes in the times, the parties are the same, and it's a desperate attempt by leftist malcontents to just rewrite history as nothing more than "the parties switched." No they didn't, Democrats have just gotten dirtier and sneakier. Just look at their employment of economic populism.

[Chuichupachichi]

{until his history suddenly stops in the mid-1960's}

Yea, he should have gone on to mention what the Christian Martin Luther King Jr. did while Democrats were busy hallucinating

[cofojeremy]

what a cunt hole...this is a silly bitch talking about shit.

i had the chance to watch this whore for the past two nights...hes a great public speaker, but speaks a lot of shit...

he's a cunt hole :)

[sgroovey]

@cofojeremy I guess you can't stand the truth. You might read your history, before you start calling people names. What a great vocabulary!

[bethhallel]

Please please...lets throw all Dems out of office NOW

[romansten9]

David Barton's work is awesome. He completely obliterates myths such as "the separation of church and state" People have heard these words so many times that they actually believe that there is a separation!

[romansten9]

David Barton's documents have been examined by his strongest opponents and found to be authentic. He has been winning legal battles because he can prove what he says. How can you argue with books and documents that are in the founding father's own handwriting, and books that were published into multiple copies? The answer is that you can't argue against them. Well, you can argue, but you will lose.

[mccabe1958]

I have no doubt the documents are authentic. But I sincerely doubt his ability to read and interpret them. Since you've already "decided" his position is true, there is no point in trying to argue otherwise with you. But the truth is the truth, and Barton's distortions cannot stand up to the scrutiny of factual evidence - in spite of your beliefs ad faith in him.

[romansten9]

I have not "decided" his positon is true. As I stated, his strongest opponents have decided they are true. How do you explain his legal victories? (please answer)

[MrMZaccone]

@romansten9 What legal victories?

[Califacience]

@mccabe1958

You don't need to "interpret" the documeents, it's not freaking poetry.

By "interpret" you mean "make it mean what fits my revisionist secularist narrative". .

What i notice is you don't refer to particular quotes that were taken out of context, you refer to general ones so that your claim ofcourse becomes irrefutable. Share some with us and we will address them.

[MrMZaccone]

@Califacience "such a wall would protect the church from the government, that there would be open and free religious expression of all orthodox religious practices" Barton has added this falsehood to the Danbury letter. Address that.

[Califacience]

@MrMZaccone

Where is this quote?

[MrMZaccone]

@Califacience It's in Barton's book.

[Mycos1]

No one is disputing that he has purchased authentic documents. Your assertion that they are is a straw-man argument. What they do dispute is his interpretation of what they say and why it was said. His unerring ability to lie about the circumstances behind the cherry-picked quotes he offers up is itself absolute proof that he cannot make his point based on the evidence alone and must therefore distort American history to say what he knows will get more followers to his perverted vision.

[kellyjustus]

It is obvious that there are breaks in this video. The whole was not presented. There are no such breaks in the original video. I saw many of them. Try looking at some of the related videos. It will go past 1860. Try putting in America's Christian Heritage, wallbuilders or David Barton.

See where that will take you.

[Jeremiahdvorak1]

Are you illiterate? Read the video description to the right of the video. It clearly says NINEteen-sixties, not EIGHTeen sixties. Get your facts straight before you go mouthing off.

[Allah666Satan]

Thank you David Barton!

[pmiller1967]

This was an excellent video! I don't see any bias, just historical facts. They can be problematic when they are out there for all to read for themselves. Thank God for men like David Barton who are standing up against the revisionists who want to erase real history and replace it with their own. BARTON IS RIGHT ON!

[kressink]

I agree most completely - Barton demonstrates a honed skill for making references out of context and then stretching them to achieve his ends. A supreme bearer of false witness.

[Bullsboy94]

well, i am a democrat, and i am pro-abortion.

[jcdjms]

Most of the negative comments I have seen here are based on nothing but heelings, often those of hatred.

[liftedor]

he may have been exaggerating by accusing democrats of wanting to keep black children in failing schools, but what did he say that was factually incorrect?

[iamundergrace]

more like factually misleading, brother.

[breligion]

Barton uses the same style of lying as Kent Hovind the creationist did. They do use authentic documents most of the time, but what they don't do is quote them properly and they often leave out words which would cause it to mean the opposite of what they want you to think it means. Barton has done this over and over. He is trying to buy up as many originals or only existing copies of works so nobody opposed to him can say he is lying. Very clever trickster.

[deadbeatdad]

It sounds to me like you don't want to be confused with the truth. Barton's facts are easily checked and he does own over 100,000 original documents written by the Founders. That is so he can backup his position, not so he can "revise" history. He is trying to educate us back to the reality of what really happened and what the original intent of the various founders really was. Do your homework. The US Government has put enough documents online to backup almost every claim he makes.

[breligion]

The intent of the founders is found in the Constitution where it never mentions Christianity being the foundation of the Constitution. Not only that, Christians want to live forever under the worst dictatorship imaginable and you actually think that mentality would lead people to want liberty? Chris Rodda completely pwned what Barton has said, because unlike his sheeple followers, she actually researched the documents he used and found exactly what we would expect. He changes what they mean.

[FunkyInTheSouth]

The truth? LOL! If you believe Barton's rubbish you wouldn't know the truth if it bit you on the ass.He quotes out of context and has used quotes that were flat out wrong.He has no respect at all for the truth and is a threat to our liberty.

[FunkyInTheSouth]

If I could post a link on here I'd give you a critique of Barton from a group of Baptists,pointing out that his claims are pretty much nonsense.Try critique of David Barton in search maybe you'll find it.

[Texasantichrist]

In this video alone, I discovered Barton lieing. Deadbeatdad, don't be hoodwinked by this fraud. If you go back and do some research yourself, you'll find that party loyalties REALIGNED durring the post great depression era. In other words, before the great depresion, Democrates were conservative and Republicans were liberal. Barton is a charlatan!

[Texasantichrist]

Deadbeatdad. He claims to have documents he quotes from, Documents he WILL NOT let other academics review. So how do you know his interpretation is accurate?

[pmiller1967]

You actually believe that, don't you breligion? Incredible. Proof positive that if you close our eyes and repeat something over and over, regardless of the verity of it, it all of the sudden becomes true (at least in you own head).

Historical facts really have no bearing against irrational and intense opinion. Not in this day and age.

[RNSOL]

People, people...lets not be hasty and say radical things based on our emotions.

David Barton, if I may say, is a fucking retard.

Thank you.

[bradhart78]

People, David Barton is NOT a historian. Look him up. Oh, and he's had to correct a number of his claims because, well, they were 100% wrong and fabricated.

[ilovehsm123456789]

david barton is just telling the truth

[zx2012]

Churches should pay taxes.....

Then your preists can play all the politics they want...

[ORNGCNTY]

So correcting the record is politics?

[patreadwell]

I am a christian and a African-American 47 years of age. Everything this brother is sharing in this video I already known. Its too bad after 1930 our people left the party that we originally belong to. I wonder if Jessie Jackson and all of the paid puppets of the democrats ever share that truth ? I wonder why the facts od history are hidden and covered up by this graying and aging group and their hand picked hand fed successors ? The truth is something the democrats and liberal republicans want.

[heesendr]

it's irrefutable--they're primary sources he's using. even if 10% of them are true, it's scandalous!

[spartanoneoneeight]

That explains alot, I thought the Ku Klux Clan only existed during the civil right movment.

[procommenter]

Democrat Harry S {no period as the S stands for nothing} Truman was a Ku Kluxer.

[procommenter]

Negro slavery was no more of an abomination in the United States in the 19th century than it is in continental Africa in the 21st century.

[sharonanony]

@procommenter WELL IN AMERICA IT IS DOCUMENTED IN THE CONSTIUTION.

The Ex-slaves are Historically Written as slaves and free people in the Constitution of the United states.

[tropicallanterns]

Wow, there are so many inaccuracies in this video. Who is this guy anyway?

[themainthing1974]

I think it's funny as hell how a lot of conservatives try to act as though the current platforms of the Republican and Democratic Parties are the same as they were in 1865! Someone would really have to be stupid to fall for this!

[btalliere]

Wow, your opinion is so interesting. It wasn't until 1961 that the Democratic Platform began to even consider a well worded civil rights position and even then it wasn't supported by democratic by in large. The truth is that neither party was completely innocent of responsibility. So for you to represent it as a long ago event is inaccurate. Truth wether we agree or not needs to be known.

[shehenazi]

i find it funny that the majority of the"slave owning south god fearin republican states" today, are the same states that fought for the "confederates" during the cilvil war. so basically the majority of christians used to be democrats!!! LOL  Jesus= slavery

[lovejoypeace7777]

REPENT, People while that there is still time to repent, God is extending His mercy and grace.

[onemanband1963]

Republicans = Lies

[Cvillberg]

You take a great video and cut and paste. He has clear historical documents of our founding history. It was the democrats that started Planned parenthood for the very purpose of killing black babies.

It's been the democrat agenda for a long time. It's the democrats that hold back the black population.

Martin Lutheran King was a Republican he knew the difference.

More democrat states have large poor populations. Look only to Chicago and Resko in which he stole in name of the poor.

[BORNTWYCE]

BIAS EDITING!!

[voyzovrezon]

Weird. He says at the end that god will hold you accountable for your vote---a vote for a black man! So what's all this talk about slavery?

[yoshi3329]

As an black American I find this offensive! why are you trying to make it seem that Democrats didn't do this? They did want slavery, pass Jim crow laws, they did oppose civil rights for blacks, and abortion that was promoted to get rid of the weeds a.k.a. blacks and Jews, and not to mention that the KKK was a branch of the democratic party. Republicans fought very hard for my ancestors, by passing the civil right bill. Please stop lying.

[RunandGunPictures]

I always laugh when I hear them claiming Abe Lincoln was a Republican. While he was a membe of a party intitled Republicans, there was a big platform switch in the early 1900s, meaning he would be a Democrat today.

[heesendr]

Barton is only stating documented facts. If you can disprove any of it, go ahead. He is not "biased." The people who covered up all these things over the years are the biased ones.

[sloopy312]

I was a white pastor and saw first hand the bigotry and hatred against blacks by the Christian right. I lost two jobs, was insulted and hated by some who used the Bible to justify their bigotry. They tried to justify slavery, segregation. They said because blacks were cursed with the mark of Cain they were meant to serve the white race. I have fought against prejudice since my High School days (late 50s). All are entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, gays included.

[jacmuv]

It was not the christian right but the left KKK was considered a christian org.

[ngarvison]

So basically what he's saying is that you can't think for yourself if your a Christian rightist. Funnily enough, I'm not sure any of them CANdo your research, the republican and democratic parties reversed in the mid 20th century. It's a shame that so many people will see this and take it at face value. Pity

[jacmuv]

you are wrong the 6 minutes here is only a tiny bit of a 2 and a half hour movie

[peppythepanda]

Strom Thurmond left the democratic party when the Southern Democrat racism became Southern Republican racism.

[jacmuv]

You are wrong he just like Ronald Reagan saw a change in their party that was socialist in nature. The GOP has not changed its platform

[115305668]

80% of the nation supported an ammendment to allow voluntary spoken prayer in schools because that's the american christian population. The person is selfish and looks no further than their own desires. As a congressman, you are elected to protect the rights of ALL of your constituency, not just the 80% majority that happens to share your religious beliefs.

[EuroCntricHipyChrist]

its sad god doesn't exist, otherwise he/she would smite this guy down with furious anger for this bullshit.

[uru86]

Oh I absolutely LOVE the fake outrage! Well...former slave owner Nancy Pelosi must be suppressing this gem of historiography.

[jerrydoubleu]

Who the fuck is this guy. Fascists and republicans use the rewrite to justify thier minds filled with fiction.

[RunandGunPictures]

Well on the Abe Lincoln thing it's hillarious, because he's completely ignoring the platform swap that happened in the 1900's, meaning while he was a member of "The Republican Party," the princables of the swap would mean he would be concidered a Democrat by today's standards.

[ChipsShot]

An fucking asshole who can't even spell hilarious, considered or principles has somehow tapped into a dead mans mind...the same man who started the Republican party.

You're a damned idiot in denial. GFYS

[RunandGunPictures]

Well in all honesty I did type it once run it through Word and then copy paste, but I must have not ctrl C'ed when I corrected.

I realize hilarious, principles and considered were misspelled only after I hit post. It's not like they let you edit your posts or anything. So yeah. I posted a few misspellings, but I'm far from an asshole. At least I have a college degree, know American history and can filter bullshit from news. Enjoy your Glenn Beck, bucko.

[ChipsShot]

GFYS asshole!

[jerrydoubleu]

Hi, chhipsshot. I like ur story of how you fucked with the waiter. I have so little effort to make to show how inconsiderate and immature the average republican is.

[mw2000]

And who went along with ALL the Democratic atrocities back through history? The Christians right. Who then flipped over to the Republican side when Dems started moving FOR civil rights? The Christian right. So where as the Democrats learned the lesson of their ways and changed, the Christian right has stayed anti-black, anti-integration and anti-freedom.

[MercifulMing]

Vote Republican in 1860!

[ubercomrade]

hahaha

[Nutrino2179]

Controlled Ignorance - the most enduring orthodoxy of the Christian tradition.