This video is very poor and misleading! why dont you make a video of Hitler with jingle bells in the background. You clearly lust for innocent peoples blood just like your hero.
Well if you dont have anything to say, then go away - you try to instigate arguments, not debates, and I think you need a thicker skin if your to succeed at it. Dont be so earnest. You are the one who is instigating hate, and attacking others. Im your enemy? hahaha - and you 'want' to make enemies? Sad pathetic man - Grow up!
Also , you should not be so personal to attack people - you dont know the first thing about me, and yet I think you would be very surprised if you did!
This man along with george bush is responsible for over a million deaths in the iraq war, and you glory in him and his past. Tony Blair will rot in hell forever and his hands will never be clean of innocent people's blood, thats some legecy for a man who is clearly your hero.
Yes, we will remember him. I just wish his new job didn't keep him so quiet. Isn't politics boring in this country now? I expect we will get over his premature departure - but it's going to take some time. For me, anyway.
Curnyn - I love how you still call him 'PM Blair'. Unfortunately here in the UK, they don't keep their title - unlike US presidents. But to me - and to you - he'll always be OUR PM!
Just been to your new video, Curmyn. Good work. Where do we harbour the blind, deaf & foolish who see no evil etc..? And to think these people are the types Blair wanted to save from some of their own. MAD! They really need to emigrate!
Your video WP, and this one here by Curnyn are now on my blog which has kept me out of trouble for the last year, since I found an unexpected cause to fight for - KEEPING A PRIME MINISTER!!! How wierd and establishmenty - except it wasn't! That's why it got to me! Didn't win the fight - but at least I tried.
I think so too. That's why it's so hard to give up on him now, even though so many of my countrymen have. Perhaps if he manages to do something about the mess that is the Middle East, they'll re-think things.I've never understood why they think HE is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands at the hands of the insurgents in Iraq. Strange sort of logic.
Your right.I support them both - I travelled to New York at the peak of the 2004 Re=election, ha.
The only thing terrorists are good at is killing and maiming, and they cant even do that right!
Through the media, and peoples naive unwillingness to listen, the terrorists are spreading out more,and onto our shores! Good luck PM Blair! Were behind you all the way :)
Hi Curnyn - keep up the good work. We should save each other's videos on the playlists which we place on our websites. That way, we might keep the hangers & floggers of our leaders, (who are doing the RIGHT things) - well at bay. Set up your video comments so that you can check each comment. I just don't publish the cursing idiotics. That's all! They've done enough damage.
Great video Curnyn. Glad to see there are a few of us who recognise a good thing when we see it. I have just put up a Blair video - "Tony Blair - Mid East Envoy - Impossible?"
He'll always be MY Prime Minister too. Missing him.
Please google "Keep Tony Blair for PM" for my blog with archives of Blair.
It's not that easy to find things here, since they don't accept URLs. So you should find my video if you copy & paste this into the search box:
Tony Blair - Middle East Peace Envoy - Impossible?
I've banned the hangers & floggers from my blog. No air space to those who want to do away with the BEST PM and international statesman I can recall. The destructive forces have already destroyed his premiership. They're not going to destroy his legacy & memory too, at least not with MY help!
If any off you want too be harsh and personnal use your own mail or join the Sky news forum, better yet the BBC.
Some nasty comments have surfaced through this thread and its so pointless. The sooner we get along and realise we are all in this together the sooner we can start to sit down and 'constructively' sort out some off the problems in the world.
Now if you're entering into a debate, it should be that you have similarly confident positions, otherwise your contributions would be of little value, i.e. :My car's faster than yours, but then again, I'm not really sure" -- this is to nobody's benefit. I would be a useless, and dishonest debater, and ought only to be a critical spectator.
Therefore, it seems feeble to say "arguably, x, y and z" without making your position clear, and being prepared to argue for it. It is only once this has been done, that critical discussion can progress. There is no shame in recanting a position, once one has been persuaded that it is wrong. In other words, there is nothing un-virtuous in declaring one's view about something unambiguously.
Well, I don't agree with that anyway, "liberals can't run...". In any case, I think that person had a left-liberal form of ideology in mind, not neo-liberalism. And finally, to be cheap and tacky, Thatcher (arguably) did a terrible job of running the country, so she is not proof that "liberals" can run a country!
so ill say it again. he was "arguably" the most liberal pm weve had. arguably. his record on civil liberties is crap, so i say "arguably". i just want to draw attention to the fact that the word "liberal" is misused/overused by some people (not you) and can, in fact, as you yourself said, mean right wing in certain situations.
Yes, but not into one representational. And he has consistently been dead against it. In fact, he has seemed to use it as a means to illegally raise funds for his political party. So he fails by that example to be liberal by that definition.
"In what sense do you mean, "Tony Blair was arguably the most liberal PM the country has ever had? "" - the key word being "arguably" here, which means "susceptible to debate". We are debating now, are we not?
Yes, but you are clearly implying that you think he's a good contender for that title. Also, if we concede your point about how "arguably" changes the meaning of your sentence, it makes it so vague as to be meaningless. Most things are "arguable", but to engage in meaningful debate, you must offer some kind of argument.
Yes, but this could be face-saving. You'll be happy to hear, I expect, that I don't really think continuing the debate about what NCHM meant is worth it.
Possibly he was implying that other people on this forum may not know what theyre talking about. Though I may be wrong here, of course. Im no backing up neoconhitman completely. I just think this statement, "You said Winston Churchill was a Liberal before. How can you claim to have knowledge of Britih Politics" is rude and mistaken. Your socrates example is facetious.
I agree that its uncontentious that Butch was mistaken about Churchill. My example wasn't intended to be facetious. It was supposed to illustrate how the fact, in spite of its truth, didn't really suit the context of the debate unless it was meant to imply Churchill was a Liberal PM.
What is "liberal"'s literal meaning then? And very often, it is commonly used to denote being right wing, in terms of fiscal policy and opposition to public ownership. Now Tony Blair's government fits those defintions quite well, but not as well as Thatcher's. On crime, he has been illiberal by any definition, on the whole. In what sense do you mean, "Tony Blair was arguably the most liberal PM the country has ever had?
by the way, as reluctant as i am to provoke this debate any further, i have to note that neoconhitman is correct when he says churchill was also a liberal. he crossed over to the liberal party in 1903, served in two liberal cabinets, and rejoined the conservatives in 1924.
so, bhmlyd, your sentence "You said Winston Churchill was a Liberal before. How can you claim to have knowledge of Britih Politics.
Hmmmm. Maybe I'm wrong but neoconhitman's message seemed to imply that Winston Churchill was a liberal at the time he was Prime Minister, which he was not. For he was responding to a comment that the Liberals haven't been head of govt. since 1922, which is correct. The fact is not disputed, what it (seemingly) was supposed to signify (that liberals were head of govt. in the 30's and 40's) is.
the key word there being "imply". actually, all he said was winston churchill was a liberal. which he was if you use capital "L". It was nothing more than a party name. He was opportunistic, abd twice transferred parties.
If youre taking "liberal" in its literal meaning, and not the way its commonly used now to suggest "not being right wing", then Tony Blair was arguably the most liberal PM the country has ever had.
Yes, but he was replying where bhmlyd said "The last liberal Prime Minister was in 1922", to which our sign-making friend said only "Winston Churchill was a liberal". Why else would he have said this were it not for making the mistaken claim that Winston Churchill, when Conservative PM, was Liberal. Otherwise it would be like me responding to the same claim with "Socrates was Greek" or some other irrelevant fact.
i dont think neoconhitman was claiming that churchill was a Liberal when PM. I think he was just drawing attention to a fact that most people do not know. ie that Churchill was at one time a Liberal.
Im taking some comments down as my account here is for my videos.Though off course free speech is always welcome and a right! I just dont want to be concerned with the fantasy off a narrow minded naive child (though he is an adult) of Neocon.
Who hides comments and speculates on 'what ifs' and 'but ifs'.
Sorry for any offense that he has caused through here :)
Where is that little tit, "Neoconhitman"? Where are the pictures, on your propaganda, of victims of Saddam's torture? George fucking Galloway? Are you having a laugh?
This is a great video of a great statesman "Neoconhitman" is an entirely predictable whinger. Perhaps he would have preferred to live in Saddam's Iraq, free from the spin of New Labour and Bush's grammar. Loser.
Quite an outburst Bibbian. I dont blame you though. He is low to say that too you. Neocon does not think off how others live or feel. Just himself and his hemp smoking Buddies. No sophistication.
Thank you for the video you sent me too.Thats kind off you. I will send the Last Aibon kago MM in the morning ( cant believe she got fired for that!)
The last liberal Prime Minister was in 1922. That's how much they can't run a country!
Let's see Campbell cope with mordern day economics, relationships with other countries, the NHS, Pensions, Schooling, Housing, and other attributes that a new government whould have to entake.
Then you have much needed charisma to engage the public.
True but if you knew anything about British politics you would have known I am also right. Here ends my part in this debate. I might come back in a few years when you've left college.
Hopefully there are no more Tony Blairs. We can't afford to suck anymore money from the NHS to finance illegal invasions.
If you watch my video again you will notice at 3:26 - 3:32 you will see in top left hand corner , someone with a sign saying I love tony. Is this you Neoconhitman?
mr gallowa is the single m.p with the worst track record for houses of commons debate and votes, he is lazy (lack of time in work), egotistical and stupid (big brother) and irresponsible (showing how much he saluted sadam hussain and his sons) he also used anti war taktics to kick oona king out of her seat,he couldnt win on any politics except the war because everyyone knows he cant run a country.
On a popular video auto comment allows spammers to fill it up with adverts for casinos,drugs and dodgy websites. I probably seem angry because I hate politicians who kill people and then pretend to care when it results in an increased level of violence around the World. I'm sure outside of politics we would get on fine. Over a game of Wii tennis most people are just people :)
You missed out the photos of dead iraqi children, cash for peerages, lies, spin, corruption and unquestionable loyalty to George 'Draft Dodger' Bush. Not to mention the CIA torture flights waved through UK airspace and the missiles transported to Israel to be used against Lebanese civilians. Apart from that you hit the nail on the head :)
Comment validation is essential for popular videos to stop them getting spammed. When you create a popular video you might need to enable it. I am happy to have my freedoms. That is why I stand up to Blair and all the people trying to take those freedoms away. People like Blair did not give us our rights. They were developed by people standing up to those in power. You right wingers were the people who would have been happy for Britain to join hands with Hitler.
neoconhitman, next time to pull another protest with your fellow liberals, how about donating money to the working class, considering you're wasting their tax payers money by closing down streets, police presence, etc...
Also you support(judging by your videos) George Galloway, who spent a whole week presenting the E4 program "Big brothers big mouth" and getting paid for it, instead of serving the residents of Bethnal Green and Bow, who elected that moron.
While Blair/Brown/Bush are wasting Billions I hardly think you can accuse me of wasting 'working class' money. I work and pay plenty of tax. The police get paid to be Policemen whether they are sitting on their arses, shooting civilians or attending a peaceful protest. Do you have a problem with MPs earning money? If you do I suggest you look closer to home.
Good for you. No idea why you think I am a Liberal. I just don't like killing people based on lies and spin. If you are so smart you will be able to argue the points using logic,fact and debate rather than running around in circles making silly statements.
It was a valid point. Many rich people in the UK refused to assist the military in the potential defence of the South Coast because they thought the Germans would successfully invade and they didn't want to annoy them. They were happy with Hitlers vision as long as they kept their land and big houses. Those people were only interested in themselves not other people getting killed.
how can anybody not see through this criminal, only half a brain is required.
In years to come his name will be spoken along with Stalin, Hitler, Armin, Pel Pot and so on....his poor grandchildren will want to change their name
ronnie7749 1 year ago
@ronnie7749 That is 'Pol Pot.
Curnyn 1 year ago
This video is very poor and misleading! why dont you make a video of Hitler with jingle bells in the background. You clearly lust for innocent peoples blood just like your hero.
123petes 3 years ago
Well if you dont have anything to say, then go away - you try to instigate arguments, not debates, and I think you need a thicker skin if your to succeed at it. Dont be so earnest. You are the one who is instigating hate, and attacking others. Im your enemy? hahaha - and you 'want' to make enemies? Sad pathetic man - Grow up!
Also , you should not be so personal to attack people - you dont know the first thing about me, and yet I think you would be very surprised if you did!
Curnyn 3 years ago
Most of the people commenting on this must be having a laugh! you are away with the fairys, and that is where i'll leave you.
123petes 3 years ago
off me ed lad. One flew the cuckoo's nest there lad
Curnyn 3 years ago
If you are the standard of my enemies, then i am a lucky man.
123petes 3 years ago
And please, dont bring up the economic argument, even hitler built mototrways and bridges when he was in power!
123petes 3 years ago
Tony Blair is a mass killer, fact!
This man along with george bush is responsible for over a million deaths in the iraq war, and you glory in him and his past. Tony Blair will rot in hell forever and his hands will never be clean of innocent people's blood, thats some legecy for a man who is clearly your hero.
123petes 3 years ago
he was a nice funny and very intellectual man a tribute to the union flag i miss him =(
mrtin2811 3 years ago
PM Tony Blair was the best PM we, british has ever had. He done wonderful things for us! He will never been forgotten!!
THANKS TONY FOR SPENDING 10YRS AND 56 DAYS OF YOUR LIFE SERVING US IN A FANTASTIC MANNER
jamaicarussa 4 years ago 7
Yes, we will remember him. I just wish his new job didn't keep him so quiet. Isn't politics boring in this country now? I expect we will get over his premature departure - but it's going to take some time. For me, anyway.
BlairSupporter 4 years ago
Every day I miss him, and then seeing Brown on the news just makes me even more depressed.
danny88101 3 years ago
Curnyn - I love how you still call him 'PM Blair'. Unfortunately here in the UK, they don't keep their title - unlike US presidents. But to me - and to you - he'll always be OUR PM!
BlairSupporter 4 years ago 2
Hehe. I have just made and posted a new video.
Entitled 'Why we must fight back'
It is on my page below the Tony Blair video.
Enjoy, take care comrad
Curnyn 4 years ago
Just been to your new video, Curmyn. Good work. Where do we harbour the blind, deaf & foolish who see no evil etc..? And to think these people are the types Blair wanted to save from some of their own. MAD! They really need to emigrate!
BlairSupporter 4 years ago
I will have a good look through your blogs and channels today.
Thank you again, Im happy to meet like minded, wise and intelligent comrads.
Curnyn 4 years ago
OMH I love him so much, btw check my Blair video's.
WorldPolitics 4 years ago 2
Your video WP, and this one here by Curnyn are now on my blog which has kept me out of trouble for the last year, since I found an unexpected cause to fight for - KEEPING A PRIME MINISTER!!! How wierd and establishmenty - except it wasn't! That's why it got to me! Didn't win the fight - but at least I tried.
BlairSupporter 4 years ago
Tony Blair is definitely worth fighting for.
WorldPolitics 4 years ago 3
I think so too. That's why it's so hard to give up on him now, even though so many of my countrymen have. Perhaps if he manages to do something about the mess that is the Middle East, they'll re-think things.I've never understood why they think HE is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands at the hands of the insurgents in Iraq. Strange sort of logic.
BlairSupporter 4 years ago
They blame everything on Bush & Blair bacause of all the media and thats what the terrorists want.
WorldPolitics 4 years ago 5
Your right.I support them both - I travelled to New York at the peak of the 2004 Re=election, ha.
The only thing terrorists are good at is killing and maiming, and they cant even do that right!
Through the media, and peoples naive unwillingness to listen, the terrorists are spreading out more,and onto our shores! Good luck PM Blair! Were behind you all the way :)
Curnyn 4 years ago
Hi Curnyn - keep up the good work. We should save each other's videos on the playlists which we place on our websites. That way, we might keep the hangers & floggers of our leaders, (who are doing the RIGHT things) - well at bay. Set up your video comments so that you can check each comment. I just don't publish the cursing idiotics. That's all! They've done enough damage.
BlairSupporter 4 years ago
Great video Curnyn. Glad to see there are a few of us who recognise a good thing when we see it. I have just put up a Blair video - "Tony Blair - Mid East Envoy - Impossible?"
He'll always be MY Prime Minister too. Missing him.
Please google "Keep Tony Blair for PM" for my blog with archives of Blair.
BlairSupporter 4 years ago
Hey'Blair supporter!
Thank you very much. I agree with you.
Im going to check out all your videos right now! ha
Thanks again !
PS - This video started a big debate here- on the comments and spilled over to other threads. It was good fun.
Curnyn 4 years ago
Curnyn,
It's not that easy to find things here, since they don't accept URLs. So you should find my video if you copy & paste this into the search box:
Tony Blair - Middle East Peace Envoy - Impossible?
I've banned the hangers & floggers from my blog. No air space to those who want to do away with the BEST PM and international statesman I can recall. The destructive forces have already destroyed his premiership. They're not going to destroy his legacy & memory too, at least not with MY help!
BlairSupporter 4 years ago
Thank you.
If any off you want too be harsh and personnal use your own mail or join the Sky news forum, better yet the BBC.
Some nasty comments have surfaced through this thread and its so pointless. The sooner we get along and realise we are all in this together the sooner we can start to sit down and 'constructively' sort out some off the problems in the world.
Curnyn 4 years ago
Boss video by the way. Good luck to Tony Blair on his New job.
tdude176 4 years ago
Now if you're entering into a debate, it should be that you have similarly confident positions, otherwise your contributions would be of little value, i.e. :My car's faster than yours, but then again, I'm not really sure" -- this is to nobody's benefit. I would be a useless, and dishonest debater, and ought only to be a critical spectator.
tdude176 4 years ago
Therefore, it seems feeble to say "arguably, x, y and z" without making your position clear, and being prepared to argue for it. It is only once this has been done, that critical discussion can progress. There is no shame in recanting a position, once one has been persuaded that it is wrong. In other words, there is nothing un-virtuous in declaring one's view about something unambiguously.
tdude176 4 years ago
Well, I don't agree with that anyway, "liberals can't run...". In any case, I think that person had a left-liberal form of ideology in mind, not neo-liberalism. And finally, to be cheap and tacky, Thatcher (arguably) did a terrible job of running the country, so she is not proof that "liberals" can run a country!
tdude176 4 years ago
so ill say it again. he was "arguably" the most liberal pm weve had. arguably. his record on civil liberties is crap, so i say "arguably". i just want to draw attention to the fact that the word "liberal" is misused/overused by some people (not you) and can, in fact, as you yourself said, mean right wing in certain situations.
jemmeto 4 years ago
I agree about its constant misuse. I think though, that to argue that Blair was the most liberal PM we've ever had is impossible to maintain.
tdude176 4 years ago
or it can mean "free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners". gay civil unions, rapid immigration.
jemmeto 4 years ago
liberal can mean "pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies". Blair reformed the House of Lords.
jemmeto 4 years ago
Yes, but not into one representational. And he has consistently been dead against it. In fact, he has seemed to use it as a means to illegally raise funds for his political party. So he fails by that example to be liberal by that definition.
tdude176 4 years ago
"In what sense do you mean, "Tony Blair was arguably the most liberal PM the country has ever had? "" - the key word being "arguably" here, which means "susceptible to debate". We are debating now, are we not?
jemmeto 4 years ago
Yes, but you are clearly implying that you think he's a good contender for that title. Also, if we concede your point about how "arguably" changes the meaning of your sentence, it makes it so vague as to be meaningless. Most things are "arguable", but to engage in meaningful debate, you must offer some kind of argument.
tdude176 4 years ago
Also, NCHM's reply when bhmlyd says Churchill was a conservative PM is "True", so i think he was aware of that...
jemmeto 4 years ago
Yes, but this could be face-saving. You'll be happy to hear, I expect, that I don't really think continuing the debate about what NCHM meant is worth it.
tdude176 4 years ago
Possibly he was implying that other people on this forum may not know what theyre talking about. Though I may be wrong here, of course. Im no backing up neoconhitman completely. I just think this statement, "You said Winston Churchill was a Liberal before. How can you claim to have knowledge of Britih Politics" is rude and mistaken. Your socrates example is facetious.
jemmeto 4 years ago
I agree that its uncontentious that Butch was mistaken about Churchill. My example wasn't intended to be facetious. It was supposed to illustrate how the fact, in spite of its truth, didn't really suit the context of the debate unless it was meant to imply Churchill was a Liberal PM.
tdude176 4 years ago
posh boy, i know it was you who broke the hairpin!
dylmhb 4 years ago
yer ma on toast
jemmeto 4 years ago
With a dollop of brown sauce
Curnyn 4 years ago
wasnt it "ee ah, mate, just giv us a dollop o' tamato source ther, wud ya lad?"
jemmeto 4 years ago
It might be, though I m sure it could off been 'Dollop o'curry' :P yummy
Curnyn 4 years ago
What is "liberal"'s literal meaning then? And very often, it is commonly used to denote being right wing, in terms of fiscal policy and opposition to public ownership. Now Tony Blair's government fits those defintions quite well, but not as well as Thatcher's. On crime, he has been illiberal by any definition, on the whole. In what sense do you mean, "Tony Blair was arguably the most liberal PM the country has ever had?
tdude176 4 years ago
by the way, as reluctant as i am to provoke this debate any further, i have to note that neoconhitman is correct when he says churchill was also a liberal. he crossed over to the liberal party in 1903, served in two liberal cabinets, and rejoined the conservatives in 1924.
so, bhmlyd, your sentence "You said Winston Churchill was a Liberal before. How can you claim to have knowledge of Britih Politics.
The mind boggles! " is a bit rude.
jemmeto 4 years ago
Hmmmm. Maybe I'm wrong but neoconhitman's message seemed to imply that Winston Churchill was a liberal at the time he was Prime Minister, which he was not. For he was responding to a comment that the Liberals haven't been head of govt. since 1922, which is correct. The fact is not disputed, what it (seemingly) was supposed to signify (that liberals were head of govt. in the 30's and 40's) is.
tdude176 4 years ago
the key word there being "imply". actually, all he said was winston churchill was a liberal. which he was if you use capital "L". It was nothing more than a party name. He was opportunistic, abd twice transferred parties.
If youre taking "liberal" in its literal meaning, and not the way its commonly used now to suggest "not being right wing", then Tony Blair was arguably the most liberal PM the country has ever had.
jemmeto 4 years ago
Yes, but he was replying where bhmlyd said "The last liberal Prime Minister was in 1922", to which our sign-making friend said only "Winston Churchill was a liberal". Why else would he have said this were it not for making the mistaken claim that Winston Churchill, when Conservative PM, was Liberal. Otherwise it would be like me responding to the same claim with "Socrates was Greek" or some other irrelevant fact.
tdude176 4 years ago
i dont think neoconhitman was claiming that churchill was a Liberal when PM. I think he was just drawing attention to a fact that most people do not know. ie that Churchill was at one time a Liberal.
jemmeto 4 years ago
Hey people!
Thank you for your comments.
Im taking some comments down as my account here is for my videos.Though off course free speech is always welcome and a right! I just dont want to be concerned with the fantasy off a narrow minded naive child (though he is an adult) of Neocon.
Who hides comments and speculates on 'what ifs' and 'but ifs'.
Sorry for any offense that he has caused through here :)
Curnyn 4 years ago
The photograph of Tony with Neil Kinnock is amazing!
This vid got a 5* rating from both my accounts. Keep up the good work!
Good luck Gordon Brown, you'll need it to follow after Blair!
bhmlyd 4 years ago
george bush is a terorist ton blair is a baby killer blah blah . go ger work looser.
dobsondale 4 years ago
Where is that little tit, "Neoconhitman"? Where are the pictures, on your propaganda, of victims of Saddam's torture? George fucking Galloway? Are you having a laugh?
tdude176 4 years ago
This is a great video of a great statesman "Neoconhitman" is an entirely predictable whinger. Perhaps he would have preferred to live in Saddam's Iraq, free from the spin of New Labour and Bush's grammar. Loser.
tdude176 4 years ago
Nice video! You have a nice page.
I know the song is John Williams.
From the Movie A.I.
Hope I am right,lol
Seems like there has been a war in here,lol.
That Neo guy I checked him.
lol What a stereotype!
Zeldamass21 4 years ago
Right song! Excellent.
Thank you for your comment.
Yes 'That Neo guy is like a parrot - 'Blair Bush Blair Bush' - whinge whinge.
Curnyn 4 years ago
Haha :)
Zeldamass21 4 years ago
Duh, he Hee. I knew it! hhe. I love that movie, but does a male not singing it on movie?
Bibbian 4 years ago
Yes Bibbian, there is a male Tenor version.
I will send you the link - I have a FTP up.
Your W Oshiete vid was taken down by YouTube!
Could you send me it? :P
Curnyn 4 years ago
I like the song alot. Not at first, but its catchy to me/
Bibbian 4 years ago
I Never get like this, no one in the country does, BUT WE DONT HAVE FUCK like you. Spit.Fuck fuokc fuck you. grow up older! YOu FUCK! Spit
Bibbian 4 years ago
Quite an outburst Bibbian. I dont blame you though. He is low to say that too you. Neocon does not think off how others live or feel. Just himself and his hemp smoking Buddies. No sophistication.
Thank you for the video you sent me too.Thats kind off you. I will send the Last Aibon kago MM in the morning ( cant believe she got fired for that!)
Curnyn 4 years ago
go to Neocons page ! He is a FUCK! YOu are nasty.HOPW dare you call me Weak. FUck fuick you.SPIT!
Bibbian 4 years ago
"True but if you knew anything about British politics you would have known I am also right."
You said Winston Churchill was a Liberal before. How can you claim to have knowledge of Britih Politics.
The mind boggles!
bhmlyd 4 years ago
"I might come back in a few years when you've left college."
I'm not the one with the immature comments. You've obviously got the intelligence of a rebellious prepubescent brat!
Take my advice from eariler on....
Grow up!
bhmlyd 4 years ago
I think Neocon went to 'Sign making' college.
And you are again attacking the UK! You say the NHS funds terrorism. Seriously man! Bhmlyd is right when he says 'grow up'
Curnyn 4 years ago
"I think Neocon went to 'Sign making' college."
Well it goes to good use, at least he can hand out "I'm with stupid" sign's to his protestor friends!
bhmlyd 4 years ago
"True but if you knew anything about British politics you would have known I am also right."
Oh dear. You're not very good at this are you?
bhmlyd 4 years ago
The last liberal Prime Minister was in 1922. That's how much they can't run a country!
Let's see Campbell cope with mordern day economics, relationships with other countries, the NHS, Pensions, Schooling, Housing, and other attributes that a new government whould have to entake.
Then you have much needed charisma to engage the public.
No thank you, he's no Tony Blair!
bhmlyd 4 years ago
Winston Churchill was a liberal.
neoconhitman 4 years ago
He was Conservative.
bhmlyd 4 years ago
True but if you knew anything about British politics you would have known I am also right. Here ends my part in this debate. I might come back in a few years when you've left college.
Hopefully there are no more Tony Blairs. We can't afford to suck anymore money from the NHS to finance illegal invasions.
neoconhitman 4 years ago
If you watch my video again you will notice at 3:26 - 3:32 you will see in top left hand corner , someone with a sign saying I love tony. Is this you Neoconhitman?
Curnyn 4 years ago
mr gallowa is the single m.p with the worst track record for houses of commons debate and votes, he is lazy (lack of time in work), egotistical and stupid (big brother) and irresponsible (showing how much he saluted sadam hussain and his sons) he also used anti war taktics to kick oona king out of her seat,he couldnt win on any politics except the war because everyyone knows he cant run a country.
dobsondale 4 years ago
its funny how liberals cant run a country !
dobsondale 4 years ago
I agree with user Curnyn.
Neoconhitman , you should be more cheerful.
Why do you not accept auto comment? Do you know you are wrong maybe? You seem angry.
Hehe user Cunyn! I never met uk Mini Moni Fan! lol! Genki!
Bibbian 4 years ago
On a popular video auto comment allows spammers to fill it up with adverts for casinos,drugs and dodgy websites. I probably seem angry because I hate politicians who kill people and then pretend to care when it results in an increased level of violence around the World. I'm sure outside of politics we would get on fine. Over a game of Wii tennis most people are just people :)
neoconhitman 4 years ago
You missed out the photos of dead iraqi children, cash for peerages, lies, spin, corruption and unquestionable loyalty to George 'Draft Dodger' Bush. Not to mention the CIA torture flights waved through UK airspace and the missiles transported to Israel to be used against Lebanese civilians. Apart from that you hit the nail on the head :)
neoconhitman 4 years ago
I was expecting an comment like this. Quite funny. I knew it!lol
You dont allow comments without your validation on your page. Tut tut. Freedom of speech hey.
You should be happy you have that privelage.
Glad you liked it :)
Curnyn 4 years ago
Comment validation is essential for popular videos to stop them getting spammed. When you create a popular video you might need to enable it. I am happy to have my freedoms. That is why I stand up to Blair and all the people trying to take those freedoms away. People like Blair did not give us our rights. They were developed by people standing up to those in power. You right wingers were the people who would have been happy for Britain to join hands with Hitler.
neoconhitman 4 years ago
Wow. Neoconhitman!Are you crazy.
I look you video's and people are nice to you, but you are nasty to them. You seem self centered.
Bibbian 4 years ago
I am only nasty to people who think it is OK to kill civilians based on the lies of politicians not being held to account.
neoconhitman 4 years ago
Oooo - Someone's in a paddy! ha ha
Just dont get too pissed off in 10 years when the tin can which you have been kicking comes back and kicks you in the teeth!
Dont you have a sign to go and make!
(As it seems there is no point in trying to have a constructive debate with you)
Curnyn 4 years ago
"You right wingers were the people who would have been happy for Britain to join hands with Hitler."
Well you've just lost all validation of your argument. Childish, idiotic and immature. You claim to be 32. I think it's about time you grow up!
dylmhb 4 years ago
neoconhitman, next time to pull another protest with your fellow liberals, how about donating money to the working class, considering you're wasting their tax payers money by closing down streets, police presence, etc...
Also you support(judging by your videos) George Galloway, who spent a whole week presenting the E4 program "Big brothers big mouth" and getting paid for it, instead of serving the residents of Bethnal Green and Bow, who elected that moron.
dylmhb 4 years ago
While Blair/Brown/Bush are wasting Billions I hardly think you can accuse me of wasting 'working class' money. I work and pay plenty of tax. The police get paid to be Policemen whether they are sitting on their arses, shooting civilians or attending a peaceful protest. Do you have a problem with MPs earning money? If you do I suggest you look closer to home.
neoconhitman 4 years ago
"NeoCon hitman aims to make a stand against corrupt politicians and other undesirables. Behind their lies, propaganda and spin is the truth ..."
And I'm here to do the same with Liberals who lack the independent thought to think for themselves!
dylmhb 4 years ago
Good for you. No idea why you think I am a Liberal. I just don't like killing people based on lies and spin. If you are so smart you will be able to argue the points using logic,fact and debate rather than running around in circles making silly statements.
neoconhitman 4 years ago
Silly statements like "You right wingers were the people who would have been happy for Britain to join hands with Hitler."
That was pathetic.
bhmlyd 4 years ago
It was a valid point. Many rich people in the UK refused to assist the military in the potential defence of the South Coast because they thought the Germans would successfully invade and they didn't want to annoy them. They were happy with Hitlers vision as long as they kept their land and big houses. Those people were only interested in themselves not other people getting killed.
neoconhitman 4 years ago