why the fuck is englands uniform like the PNG rugby league & union teams uniform?? I actually thought it was my country playing!??! fuck! go get your own jersey vwith your national colors! the union side even wore all black in the world cup! geez it cant be that hard can it!! look at your flag faggots, and create your jeresy!
Havin a laugh at these comments on one race being superior to another! If Hitler were alive today he would be farkin embarrassed at the fortunes of his white master race! Lol.
I dont really care, but to add my opinion, NFL is a joke of a sport where 300lb burger munchers are called athletes. Only 1 country plays it properly, theres like 50 players per team which is ridiculous and players skills are devoted to a single aspect, like theres a position purely for kicks. WTF? players should have all round skills for every aspect, otherwise it just gets crazy. Also rugby doesnt use any padding of any kind so I'm guessing it requires a lot more balls to play it!!! OUCH USA
Yeah, the poster frame looked like it was going to be former South African rugby star Jacques Snyman leading his team in a dance routine to Single Ladies.
@JamesThrowing NFL players would have way too much Size, Speed and athletic ability across the board. Rugby teams generally have a couple of freak athletes in the NFL every team has 12-13 of them lol.
It's a good idea from the perspective of being more competitive but I can't help but feel the art of sports in general is being lost when players are becoming more and more like robots.
@AgentGhost I'm not sure I can agree to that. Even with the better training and whatnot, the soul of the player still won't be adjusted that much, IMO. I'm just beginning to really learn Touch Rugby and I know for a fact I'd like a bit more of a methodical approach to both training and playing. Creativity spawns from a good foundation and I think this is a massive step forward for both sevens and touch.
aah... rugby sevens.. only the best, brightest, fastest and fittest players are chosen to play a game of sevens. only the superstars. great memories.. rugby liberated my life.. damn proud of those days for the rest of my life. jersey #15. fullback. aye sir, best of times. rugby has taught me not to be afraid of anything
@truboricua so if Marshawn Lynch would run over half of them and juke the other half, then he wouldn't need blockers in the NFL and still score every time he gets the ball...i would love to see him in a rugby game to do that...both sports are tough and similar but you still can't compare them because their different sports...
Rugby players are tough as hell, no doubt. But athletically, they're no match for NFL players. If u put a guy like Marshawn Lynch on a rugby field, he'd run over half of the players and juke the other half. I'd say Rugby guys are tougher but NFL players are faster and stronger.
the impact of rugby tackles aren't as big as NFL ones.
@truboricua Lynch would be crap. He'd have to play Wing or Fullback and doesn't have any of the skills for it. Rugby is a team game, Lynch would be okay running in an open field but he'd be an absolute liability in every other aspect of the game. No team would want him.
Too many football fans are blissfully ignorant to the skills required of Rugby players, or the athleticism. Lynch is nothing special
In rugby all players get to touch the ball, forwards can score tries while in NFL they just stay still and does shoving until the end of the match second while NFL only the Offense get to play the ball while the Defense rely on chances and mistakes, even the forwards in NFL should get to play,NFl is very boring and whats up with the stoppages no momentum at all!!
Comparing rugby and American football is like comparing cricket and Baseball - someone throws a ball at you in both but they are completely different sports. The rules of tackling in American football make the helmets and pads necessary. There are more career ending injuries in american football than in rugby, this should tell you that american footballers are not "Pussies"
Rugy Sevens is intense! I would never play it. Never played American Football either, only wrestled. However that top rated comment up there about American Footballers being pussies...they tackle full sprint with the most force so while Rugby is tough, I doubt footballers are pussies.
@BluePhantomCavalier Yep, but in Rugby you have to use specific technique to prevent possible injuries due to not wearing pads. In football, they had to add pads a while ago because of the high death rates to players because of all the different angles of tackle allowed and being able to tackle as hard as you want, even just bulldozing them. Even now Football experiences more injuries and deaths than rugby a year, because even with pads, they are still plowing through eachother full-force.
@usmc12108 Well hey, everyone's allowed to have their own opinions. However unless you've done football yourself my opinion is you're being just a tad ignorant, and that's not an insult but people from one sport should stop dissing on other sports they haven't played. I'm in wrestling and have heard plenty of arguments on why it's 10x harder and shit than football from a bunch of guys who've never played the sport, and I don't know if it really is(I doubt it) so I don't take sides.
yes i agree of course when i was a young lad i lived in america and played football i know the aspects the hitting injuries etc.. rugby is much more physical,better endurance and cardio and of course its fun mate do you play rugby? or have ever? if not consider both points of views on the physicality of the 2 sports, and remember this, SOCCER IS FOR KIDS, FOOTBALL IS FOR WUSSIES, AND RUGBY IS FOR MEN!
@usmc12108 I've considered both points of view, and I never said Ruckers are pussies or don't have to take hits, I'm enlightening all you ignorant fucks that football isn't a pussy sport, and you need to grow the fuck up and stop hating on other sports. Who gives a fuck how hard your damn rugby games are in comparision, and how much you think Football players are pussies because of that? IT DOESN'T MATTER.
im done arguing with you mate, clearly you dont understand that a man who cant take a hit without pads is a pussy. football is a physical sport yes, but it is a game for little boys, not for men mate.
@usmc12108 I used to think that, too. But when you compare a football player to a rugby player, the brick walls of American football players are 300 or more pounds! Sure, in rugby you are colliding with each other without padding, but compared to a 350 pound tackle...I don't think that you are really being fair! Put a rugby player up against Herman Johnson, Brandon Mckinney, Aaron Gibson! Yes, it takes a lot of manliness to play a game like rugby. American football is not a little boys game!
@usmc12108 And they wear pads, because of the high amount of deaths in the early years of the sport, much higher than Rugby I might add. There's still an immensely high injury and death rate in the sport at just a high school level alone. Tell the kid who can't move from the neck down because of a football football tackle he's a pussy.
well if you look at it mate, they weear heavy helmets and padding everywhere its not neccessary they may die bcuz of all the wrattling going on in their heads from the helmets and padding and yes it is true rugby players dont die as much because they dont wear the pads, yes football players hit but we dont see them hitting without the pussy pads either aye?
No, they don't have their heads rattling around in helmets, but they get teeth lodged behind their eyes, in their skulls and arms! And how many rugby players are above 300 lbs? I haven't seen a lot. Not doubting it. But...Anyway...I really like rugby.
@theOYRISHCLOVER we play alot of rugby league at school, obviously league isnt as full on as union . but we also had a bunch of american footballers come from a american college and they would not participate in league or union with us. apparently its too full on and we dont wear any protective gear
@theOYRISHCLOVER The thing about American Football and Rugby is similar, but tough and physical sports, but rugby players don't wear protection unlike American Football players do and rugby players keep on playing, instead of 1 minute or so!
I don't know why you jack-asses are hating on American Football. Show some Fucking RESPECT. You guys bitch about Am. FBall on a rugby video? Wankers!!!
@nicksalemno killsourenemy is right. there is a difference between aerobic and an anaerobic game. rugby players have much more endurance than american football players, but american football players are much larger and stronger. American football is much more high intensity because there is the same amount of action happening over a much shortened length of time. Rugby players also play less intense because they know there is no breaks... they reserve their energy for emergencies.
“I think the more violent game is American football, and the more physically challenging is rugby" –Richard Tardits, who played rugby with France’s national youth team before moving to the US and picking up football. Tardits would go on to play linebacker for the New England Patriots and Arizona Cardinals before returning to rugby as a member of the US national team.
How about we atop arguing about this shot. Face it American Football was developed solely from rugby, the decided to wear pads to stop their "injuries", and to show independence from the English (who most you Americans are demanded from) they introduced forward throwing. However the original sport of rugby is a far greater sport sue to it's history. We all know original sports are greater than their succeeders and today the NFL is purely a marketing tool, it is quiet obvious. Lastly the major f
Just FYI Rugby originated from Football, not the other way around. It was sort of concieved at the school of Rugby when the guys were playing football (without pads, mind you) and one of the just started throwing the ball backwards constantly and it srt of caught on. I agree with your point, though.
American football is just an importation of rugby. The first match of American football was played in 1869 and the rules was written in 1906. The oldest complete rugby roles are from 1845. Rugby originated from football-clubs and was called Rugby-football hence the name football in the US for the sissy-variation of the sport.
this is too funny... just because we wear pads, football is less violent? there are far less hits in a rugby game since whenever a player comes up to hit em they pitch the ball to the next player... and by the way.. compare the size of a nfl player and a rugby player.. they will woop u
@Beetoo221 a 'large' football player would get ruined by a rugby player. Sure you can stand there, but stand there while (back in the day) Jonah Lomu runs at him, Any of the Tuilagi brothers, SBW, Nonu or Umaga. Rugby is skill, they pass it to the next player to let the game FLOW. Something Americans don't understand, stopping and starting is so pointless. HEY NICE PADS ASSHOLE.
Rugby is a great game to play and to watch and i believe that football might be fun to play in it's own way, but in my opinion football is quite a boring game to watch. Football's just a theater with very few peak points which otherwise bores u to death.
the day I see a rugby video that doesn't have a bunch of little trolls crying and bitching is the day ill be a very happy man. oh and badlerify you sound like a faggot.
hahaha far more deadly wtf its because you pussys wear pads you idiots the front 3 in a scrum obsorb over 4 ton of pressure every time the connect with the other team just take off the pussy pads AND a far more high impact game ever played is RUGBY LEAGUE
rugby players are REAl MEN american football players are all PUSSYS with there pads and helmets they probably wear tampons too they cant tackle for shit and there ball carriers who run the ball and there receivers cant attack for shit yall should take that crap off and play with no pads and wtf is up with all the ass grabbing
@badlerify i don't really prefer rugby to the NFL or vice versa...but an average NFL player is quicker, stronger and fitter than a rugby player. the worst running back in the NFL would probably be one of the best union players in the world if they switched codes (and downgraded their salary by about $10 million in the process)....just keeping it real...NFL players are wayyy better athletes
@dsquaredmlg you are delusional, there is no way the average nfl player if fitter than a rugby player you have no idea how hard they train for fitness in the pre season. also i have been living in canada for about 3 months now, originally from australia. so there is a lot of nfl shown here, you do realise that someone like adrian peterson would not make a professional squad they lack the ball skills to make it. yet you think the worst rb would be the best rugby player...get real
@tddog01 ball skills? i'm talking about pure talent and athleticism...if you compare bench, squat, deadlift max's and 10m, 20m sprints the NFL players would rape the rugby players. there's no talent in union. I know several professional union players from the reds...they are pretty unimpressive athletes...just heavy really
@dsquaredmlg yeh i agree some unions players are that athletic but then there are the league players who are on a different level from union. a relative of mine actually plays in the NRL and he tells me of the fitness/weights regime they do its insane. players likes akuila uate, benji marshall, greg inglis, kevin locke, jarryd hayne, etc are just as athletic as any nfl playeer
@tddog01 those players are good athletes, I agree, but still they can't touch nfl running backs, tight ends, etc. in speed, strength or agility. Look man who plays rugby really? Australia, New Zealand, some tiny islands in the Pacific - total populaton about 30 million people. The US has a population over 10 times that....there's just wayyy more talent there (plus lots of black dudes who are way faster and stronger and more athletic)...keep it real man
@dsquaredmlg you're kinda forgetting about europeans playing rugby aswell. remember that the usa is the only country where nfl if actually played on a big scale. rugby union however is even in a small country like the netherlands growing every year.
@ToNGanStuNNa650 lol what? There's no trolling here. Wide receivers running backs and saftey's there's no... lol omg please stop it it's new years eve. LOLOLOL
@dsquaredmlg what does race have to do with being fit, and there is no comparison to the NFL and Rugby Sevens they are 2 different sports and played in different ways. Its like comparing judo to boxing there are some similarities and it requires fitness, but its a different sport.. anyways this is an old topic
@maven21 haha bro don't try to be all politically correct and shit...what does race have to do with athleticism? absolutely everything. here's a fun fact - the top 100 fastest times ever run in the 100m sprint were all run by sprinters of West African decent. All the sprinters in the last 10 100m olympic finals were of West African decent...that's why I say what I say...running backs in the NFL (most of whom are of west african decent) are faster and stronger and better athletes
@dsquaredmlg dude there is not political correctness in anything and what you are seeing is just plain socioeconomics. The sports you describe are low investment so it natural that certain groups would be more represented in them and more numbers the higher you have of people who will excel Fencers are highly athletic, Motocross, equestrian sports, sailing, winter sports, list goes on that are most white, but they are world class athletes. Being an athlete is universal even if the access is not
@maven21 please stop dude....your comment makes no sense already. why are west africans quicker and more powerful (on average) than say, asians for example? because of evolution and the lifestyle their ancestors lived
@dsquaredmlg so you mean to tell me that no European or Asian ran anywhere in their history, hunted, gathered meat for the tribe? German has one of the top teams in soccer and they have beat African teams all the time, And how come Asia is a powerhouse in marital arts if slower and weaker ? What makes no sense is for a resonable fellow like you seem to be would be hung up on something as trival as race as a basis for athletic performance. Its always about numbers and accessibility not race
@maven21 haha please stop fighting reality...u know how people say "white men can't jump"? there's a basis to that...it's called evolution. On average, people of west african decent are more powerful. Ethiopians are fitter (because of the fact that they were raised at high altitude), pacific islanders are heavier, stronger and put on weight easier (because they used to be hunter-gatherers). White people tolerate the cold better...all races are specialized to their environment
@dsquaredmlg specalized to their environments yes...locked in...no. Of course if I lived in a higher altitude I would adapt, but what you a talking about is the basis of athletcs being based on race. First people move around all the time, next comes training and sports programs, next accessabiility to sport and numbers of participants to the sport national sport higher level of talent. and if you want make that bet on white men not jumping i will gladly take your money... love the debate BTW :-)
@maven21 na dude the accessibility argument basically goes out the window when you look at US sprinters...whites and blacks in the US have more or less the same opportunities to participate in sprinting but all their sprinters are black (I assume of West African decent). I don't know why West Africans are quicker man...something to do with the environment there I assume...but it's hard to fight fact...100 of the quickest 100m times EVER - all West African. that is no coincidence
@dsquaredmlg come on man..you gotta look closer accessibility AND participation. Many talented white athletes choose not compete in the shorter distance events, while most of them are in the long distance, cross country, ect. So then what do you see higher numbers in the sprints, well naturally you are going to have more talented people. Jeremy Warner..gold medalist 400 meters is white, Athens a chinese guy won the 110m hurdles.How do you explain them? With your theroy that should not happen.
@maven21 the 400m and 110m hurdles are not power events...400m is a completely different type of fitness then the 100m sprint and hurdles rely a great deal on technique and flexibility - not just power. Plus I am not even saying that there aren't exceptions...who knows maybe one day a white guy will get in the 100m olympic final or even win it...but the fact remains that an overwhelming amount of sprinters are of West African decent...
@dsquaredmlg Agreed but we differ in the source of that. You say race, I say participation and the fact that there are many execptions shows race is not the basis for success. Don't have to be black to run and don't have to be black to run well, but you do have to have elite training, athleticism and participation by large talent pool and of the 3. Two of them depend on socioeconomics and location where race does play a factor. No winter sports in Haiti and no summer sports in Norway.
@maven21 haha why do you keep saying participation and training? When I say athletes of "West African decent" I don't mean they were born in West Africa. Just that they have West African roots...they may be American, Jamaican, French, Dutch or anything by nationality and may represent those countries at the Olympics....so they have the EXACT same opportunities and training as white athletes in those countries...but they are still better. please explain why that is
@dsquaredmlg Years ago sports were segregated. If you looked at early basketball, baseball all the top athletes were white. You could say and people did that whites were better athletes, but it only reflected the lack of PARTICIPATION in the sport, not racial superiority. More blacks are in the sports but its due to higher levels of minorities and larger talent pool, but not due to any racial superiority. If it was just racial ability you would see more black fencers,divers,sailors,skiers, ect
@dsquaredmlg look square don't get me wrong I see where you are coming from on this. but wars were fought, millions and millions of people died or were enslaved, and basic rights were denied many people over this whole racial superiority crap. It is not a compliment and only fosters hatred.I for one have learned the lessons that people have suffered for and recognize the contributions of many races. That is not political correct..its just correct
@dsquaredmlg Most of the black guys we had in our unit when I was still serving with the Royal Marine Commando's were extremely LAZY and weren't particularly beast in combat over in Afghanistan, the white guys and British/Asians and Gurkhas were far better....Ben Cohen ,British born and Bred, English DESCENT Through and through , was for a few years the strongest athlete in Rugby...so,...why is that? You put everything down to race which is proven to be GARBAGE.
@LCStreetPhotographer You just put everything down to race too "most black guys are lazy in the army" Hard to believe you would have been exposed to the majority of all black men in the army. I call bullshit.
@dsquaredmlg When I left the military in 06 I attended the University of Portsmouth and studied for a degree, BSc (Hons) Sport and Exercise Science (reputed to be one of the best in the world for this particular degree course) and its a proven fact that there is now issue of one race being particularly superior to another. Most of it actually boils down to "environment or socio-economic background." Fact is most ethnic minorities use sport as a way to get off of the street. FACT.
@dsquaredmlg I now work as a Sports Scientist and official Strength and Conditioning coach specialising in elite rugby players, boxers and track athletes with Lucozade Inc.
@LCStreetPhotographer do you ever stop to take a break from patting yourself on the back? I get it, you can't accept reality/are borderline racist...your shitty qualifications don't impress me
@dsquaredmlg however even if what you say there is true I bet the average Rugby Union backrow forward (more flankers) would absolutely dick NFL players in terms of endurance because that's what they train for whereas in NFL its suited to short burst, high intensity. both sports have completely different forms of fitness
Goldiney is a pathetic racist piece of shit. He gets a kick out of using hate speech toward people who do not share his worldview and people he knows nothing about. He is a closet faggot and that is why he was watching this video.
These arguments are really stupid. The people who say American Football players are pansies for wearing pads need to watch more NFL and the people saying rugby players aren't tough need to watch more rugby. Rugby is an exhausting brutal sport, NFL players NEED to wear pads otherwise they'd literally be killed, paralyzed every game. They're two completely different sports, you all sound stupid.
When an average american football player hits a stationary person, that is equal to approx getting hit by a moving car traveling a little over 40 km per hour. A rugby player hits with significantly less than that. But each are hitting hard respective to their sport.
Football players need padding because they can't handle a tackle without it.....americans aren't as physically fit and don't have a healthy diet....other countries are more physically fit with a great diet so they don't have to lift weights to hit hard...they naturally can. Americans that play football typically are physically fit because they have to lift weights to get the job done during a game.....rugby players don't have to count on weights to help them win.
And your comment might be dumbest of all. That's like me saying all Brits have horrible teeth, it's an old, stupid generalization. Most Americans are physically fit and care about their diets, and NFL players in particular are physical fucking anomalies. Anyone who wants to be bigger and stronger to hit harder needs to be on a weight lifting regimen, you don't pop out of the fucking womb 6'3 and 250 pounds of muscle. My lord you are dumb, read a fucking book or something.
Nah man rugbys way more of a hard mans sport. Football they wear pads and shit. And apparently some football players are giving rugby players credit as being more physical cause they wear no padding. Yea the may hit harder but take all the padding off and actually tackle and c how that goes.
Amazing athletes. God bless Rugby!
tkdmom2000 23 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FAGS GAME
GanEdenVideo 5 days ago 9
@GanEdenVideo Takes one to know one they say.
Greenkai3000 4 days ago
@Greenkai3000 good for you
GanEdenVideo 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GanEdenVideo I hope you die bro. your gay
Thisisfun45 4 days ago
@Thisisfun45 You can hope all you, it wont happen and the curse WILL return to you "bro" God bless.
GanEdenVideo 4 days ago 4
Erotic massage by Dr Dick, 248 563 5659 biz dudes seeking appt daily
massagebydick 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SEE, GOOD TEQUINICS (( SHOTOBUSHINKAI DIEGO))
gabriel9513 1 week ago
gayest 'sport' ever.
redneckblacklabel 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
☺ @redneckblacklabel YOUR ACCOUNT NAME SUITS YOU WELL...REDNECK THATS YOU ☺
itzmeee98 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thumbs up if you expected to watch the Haka
ThST1994 2 weeks ago 7
why the fuck is englands uniform like the PNG rugby league & union teams uniform?? I actually thought it was my country playing!??! fuck! go get your own jersey vwith your national colors! the union side even wore all black in the world cup! geez it cant be that hard can it!! look at your flag faggots, and create your jeresy!
Jaso700 2 weeks ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
MOST ARROGANT TRY - WATCH
/watch?v=72YGtRhfCgk
ThunderStruckBeast69 2 weeks ago
@19065steven, FACT: those that call others gay are usually gay themselves.
Apidium 2 weeks ago
Havin a laugh at these comments on one race being superior to another! If Hitler were alive today he would be farkin embarrassed at the fortunes of his white master race! Lol.
2patero 2 weeks ago
When will pretty muscled men pay taxes on their beauty ?
explorer45 2 weeks ago
@cromton3301 wut the matter with being gay ..!!!
vinnieusa100 3 weeks ago
Faggots and Gays eh??? I bet you wouldn't say that to their faces HA HA HA
crompton33001 3 weeks ago
Ur gay
19065steven 4 weeks ago
@19065steven - so what if someone is gay...whats your issue? Stay "straight" and mind your own damn business.
313pookie313 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@19065steven - So what if someone here is gay, what's your issue? Stay straight and mind your own damn business!
313pookie313 4 weeks ago
I was hoping to see sexy guys without t-shirt... pfff
Guilland23 4 weeks ago 45
This has been flagged as spam show
ghetto workout Serbia /watch?v=HQCqgLg4zUY
nemanjam86bg 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LISTEN THIS NEW SONG ON YOU TUBE..
NACAO NESTA - LIBERDADE
NACAO NESTA - LIBERDADE
NACAO NESTA - LIBERDADE
NACAO NESTA - LIBERDADE
NACAO NESTA - LIBERDADE
NACAO NESTA - LIBERDADE
Themplo 1 month ago
Wtf is this gay shit? Fuck you
iJustDontGiveAShit 1 month ago
@iJustDontGiveAShit lol. someones mad.
guitar12345678901 1 month ago
@guitar12345678901 Fuck you too and your guitar.
iJustDontGiveAShit 1 month ago
@iJustDontGiveAShit Your so stupid :)
guitar12345678901 4 weeks ago
Thumbs up if you thought this was a HAKA video ...
QwertyQwertyHadskill 1 month ago
what are you guys thoughts on joe maddock
likerz1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I dont really care, but to add my opinion, NFL is a joke of a sport where 300lb burger munchers are called athletes. Only 1 country plays it properly, theres like 50 players per team which is ridiculous and players skills are devoted to a single aspect, like theres a position purely for kicks. WTF? players should have all round skills for every aspect, otherwise it just gets crazy. Also rugby doesnt use any padding of any kind so I'm guessing it requires a lot more balls to play it!!! OUCH USA
Marchys11 1 month ago
Thumbs up if you were totally misled by the title of this video and were disappointed.
Sozzles 1 month ago 243
@Sozzles
Yeah, the poster frame looked like it was going to be former South African rugby star Jacques Snyman leading his team in a dance routine to Single Ladies.
RowdyPumper 4 weeks ago
@Sozzles I agree with you! Thumbs up! I was hoping to see the Haka!
hotpinkisamazing21 1 day ago
But I have always been interested in who would win in a match - american footballers vs. rugby players???
JamesThrowing 1 month ago
@JamesThrowing NFL players would have way too much Size, Speed and athletic ability across the board. Rugby teams generally have a couple of freak athletes in the NFL every team has 12-13 of them lol.
Username01793 1 month ago
@Username01793 Dumbest post I've seen all day. The NFL team would win the NFL game and the Rugby team would win the Rugby game.
If anything I would fancy the Rugby team to do better at Football than vice versa. Athleticism doesn't even come into it
z0mgrugbyreturns 1 month ago
This video has a mana bar.
JizzMasterPino 1 month ago
It's a good idea from the perspective of being more competitive but I can't help but feel the art of sports in general is being lost when players are becoming more and more like robots.
AgentGhost 1 month ago
@AgentGhost I'm not sure I can agree to that. Even with the better training and whatnot, the soul of the player still won't be adjusted that much, IMO. I'm just beginning to really learn Touch Rugby and I know for a fact I'd like a bit more of a methodical approach to both training and playing. Creativity spawns from a good foundation and I think this is a massive step forward for both sevens and touch.
BigBlack81 1 month ago
Is the world really that behind in technology, the US has been doing this since the late 90's
TerroristKiller1 1 month ago
aah... rugby sevens.. only the best, brightest, fastest and fittest players are chosen to play a game of sevens. only the superstars. great memories.. rugby liberated my life.. damn proud of those days for the rest of my life. jersey #15. fullback. aye sir, best of times. rugby has taught me not to be afraid of anything
yokehuatgoh 1 month ago
taking cci to the next step lol.
bettypro 1 month ago
@truboricua so if Marshawn Lynch would run over half of them and juke the other half, then he wouldn't need blockers in the NFL and still score every time he gets the ball...i would love to see him in a rugby game to do that...both sports are tough and similar but you still can't compare them because their different sports...
cvalo15 1 month ago
Rugby players are tough as hell, no doubt. But athletically, they're no match for NFL players. If u put a guy like Marshawn Lynch on a rugby field, he'd run over half of the players and juke the other half. I'd say Rugby guys are tougher but NFL players are faster and stronger.
the impact of rugby tackles aren't as big as NFL ones.
truboricua 1 month ago
@truboricua well i agree about the hits but i think it would be close in terms of speed and strength
AndyFize 1 month ago
@truboricua
>If u put a guy like Marshawn Lynch on a rugby field, he'd run over half of the players and juke the other half.
if he tried to run through 2 people, he would get dump tackled.
>the impact of rugby tackles aren't as big as NFL ones.
and that's because NFL players have fucking huge amounts of armor and protection
please try to be unbiased when you're comparing nfl and rugby
dylan257 1 month ago
@truboricua Lynch would be crap. He'd have to play Wing or Fullback and doesn't have any of the skills for it. Rugby is a team game, Lynch would be okay running in an open field but he'd be an absolute liability in every other aspect of the game. No team would want him.
Too many football fans are blissfully ignorant to the skills required of Rugby players, or the athleticism. Lynch is nothing special
z0mgrugbyreturns 1 month ago
England wearing PNG style jerseys
mason4332 1 month ago
kcouger12 i already have mate
badlerify 1 month ago
i played 7s... lot of fun lot of work and it was still pretty awesome
catrank1 1 month ago
@killsourenemy whats up with the stoppages mate, no momentum at all very boring indeed!!
Leps17eagles 2 months ago
Comment removed
Leps17eagles 2 months ago
In rugby all players get to touch the ball, forwards can score tries while in NFL they just stay still and does shoving until the end of the match second while NFL only the Offense get to play the ball while the Defense rely on chances and mistakes, even the forwards in NFL should get to play,NFl is very boring and whats up with the stoppages no momentum at all!!
Leps17eagles 2 months ago
lol lets get real, Football and Rugby are 2 different species, Americans only like to play sports they make up.
EliteBusJr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
click on my name and see my video with bodyweight exercises. or
/watch?v=HQCqgLg4zUY
thanks
nemanjam86bg 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Comparing rugby and American football is like comparing cricket and Baseball - someone throws a ball at you in both but they are completely different sports. The rules of tackling in American football make the helmets and pads necessary. There are more career ending injuries in american football than in rugby, this should tell you that american footballers are not "Pussies"
joey21288 2 months ago
Comment removed
joey21288 2 months ago
Rugy Sevens is intense! I would never play it. Never played American Football either, only wrestled. However that top rated comment up there about American Footballers being pussies...they tackle full sprint with the most force so while Rugby is tough, I doubt footballers are pussies.
theOYRISHCLOVER 2 months ago 33
@theOYRISHCLOVER yea there are actually more injuries in american football because the guys sell out their bodies every single hit
gadawg6441 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER rugby players also tackle from full on sprint.. that's all i got to say
BluePhantomCavalier 1 month ago
@BluePhantomCavalier Yep, but in Rugby you have to use specific technique to prevent possible injuries due to not wearing pads. In football, they had to add pads a while ago because of the high death rates to players because of all the different angles of tackle allowed and being able to tackle as hard as you want, even just bulldozing them. Even now Football experiences more injuries and deaths than rugby a year, because even with pads, they are still plowing through eachother full-force.
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER by tackle you mean ouuu ouuu plz no plz no dont kick me in knee ouch ouch..plzzz red card he kicked me! nooooo :(((((
Mikorkor 1 month ago
@Mikorkor Nope, I mean tackle. Full-force. As my comment states I said AMERICAN Football, you're refering to Soccer I presume.
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER ah k ye i was talking about how tough soccer players are.
Mikorkor 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER
yes they are!! they wear pads!! football is for for boys mate, rugby is for men!!!
usmc12108 1 month ago
@usmc12108 Well hey, everyone's allowed to have their own opinions. However unless you've done football yourself my opinion is you're being just a tad ignorant, and that's not an insult but people from one sport should stop dissing on other sports they haven't played. I'm in wrestling and have heard plenty of arguments on why it's 10x harder and shit than football from a bunch of guys who've never played the sport, and I don't know if it really is(I doubt it) so I don't take sides.
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER
yes i agree of course when i was a young lad i lived in america and played football i know the aspects the hitting injuries etc.. rugby is much more physical,better endurance and cardio and of course its fun mate do you play rugby? or have ever? if not consider both points of views on the physicality of the 2 sports, and remember this, SOCCER IS FOR KIDS, FOOTBALL IS FOR WUSSIES, AND RUGBY IS FOR MEN!
usmc12108 1 month ago
@usmc12108 I've considered both points of view, and I never said Ruckers are pussies or don't have to take hits, I'm enlightening all you ignorant fucks that football isn't a pussy sport, and you need to grow the fuck up and stop hating on other sports. Who gives a fuck how hard your damn rugby games are in comparision, and how much you think Football players are pussies because of that? IT DOESN'T MATTER.
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER
im done arguing with you mate, clearly you dont understand that a man who cant take a hit without pads is a pussy. football is a physical sport yes, but it is a game for little boys, not for men mate.
usmc12108 1 month ago
@usmc12108 And that's your opinion and that's all fine. But you're still an ignorant fuck :)
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
@usmc12108 I used to think that, too. But when you compare a football player to a rugby player, the brick walls of American football players are 300 or more pounds! Sure, in rugby you are colliding with each other without padding, but compared to a 350 pound tackle...I don't think that you are really being fair! Put a rugby player up against Herman Johnson, Brandon Mckinney, Aaron Gibson! Yes, it takes a lot of manliness to play a game like rugby. American football is not a little boys game!
bluedragon94 1 month ago
@usmc12108 And they wear pads, because of the high amount of deaths in the early years of the sport, much higher than Rugby I might add. There's still an immensely high injury and death rate in the sport at just a high school level alone. Tell the kid who can't move from the neck down because of a football football tackle he's a pussy.
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER
well if you look at it mate, they weear heavy helmets and padding everywhere its not neccessary they may die bcuz of all the wrattling going on in their heads from the helmets and padding and yes it is true rugby players dont die as much because they dont wear the pads, yes football players hit but we dont see them hitting without the pussy pads either aye?
usmc12108 1 month ago
No, they don't have their heads rattling around in helmets, but they get teeth lodged behind their eyes, in their skulls and arms! And how many rugby players are above 300 lbs? I haven't seen a lot. Not doubting it. But...Anyway...I really like rugby.
bluedragon94 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER we play alot of rugby league at school, obviously league isnt as full on as union . but we also had a bunch of american footballers come from a american college and they would not participate in league or union with us. apparently its too full on and we dont wear any protective gear
troubsy99 1 month ago
@troubsy99 Good for you guys, I've stopped giving a damn about these arguments so great! Guess those guys are pussies, congrats.
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
@theOYRISHCLOVER The thing about American Football and Rugby is similar, but tough and physical sports, but rugby players don't wear protection unlike American Football players do and rugby players keep on playing, instead of 1 minute or so!
JamesThrowing 1 month ago
@JamesThrowing Yepppp.
theOYRISHCLOVER 1 month ago
I pushed snow button.
kubaAk47 2 months ago
STOP COMPARING TWO DIFFERENT FUCKING GAMES.
jadsuckme 2 months ago
I don't know why you jack-asses are hating on American Football. Show some Fucking RESPECT. You guys bitch about Am. FBall on a rugby video? Wankers!!!
5xthejoy 2 months ago
@nicksalemno killsourenemy is right. there is a difference between aerobic and an anaerobic game. rugby players have much more endurance than american football players, but american football players are much larger and stronger. American football is much more high intensity because there is the same amount of action happening over a much shortened length of time. Rugby players also play less intense because they know there is no breaks... they reserve their energy for emergencies.
j0hnst3r 2 months ago
all props to those that play rugby.
TheAmbivalency 2 months ago
im an american i find that rugby is way better than football
hypeboy94 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out youtube /ManxDanny for big rugby hits !
ManxDanny 2 months ago
my penis brought me here
cincrlatko 2 months ago
“I think the more violent game is American football, and the more physically challenging is rugby" –Richard Tardits, who played rugby with France’s national youth team before moving to the US and picking up football. Tardits would go on to play linebacker for the New England Patriots and Arizona Cardinals before returning to rugby as a member of the US national team.
ruiner1 2 months ago
russiangirlfriend.co.uk
zoobow2 2 months ago
Bahahaha Football fans. Rugby fans. Cant we all just get alongg? Twoooo different sportsss!
kickbutt1111 2 months ago
ОНИ ДИКАРИ НО МНЕ НРАВИТСЯ!
mihail9031 2 months ago
*here
Sphynxinator 2 months ago
I came there for muscle. *it's okay*
Sphynxinator 2 months ago
Today i played rugby and football, hands down RUGBY WAS BETTER
david33456 2 months ago
Man...i'm American...I must say this looks 10x better than football
Acoontey 2 months ago
Brett Davison - England Physio & Conditioner
He's the South African guy they hired to tell them when they should feel pain
A typical day for Brett would be shouting phrases such as:
" Stop being a moffie"
"MOER HIM"
"Is that all you got"
"My Grandma hits harder than that"
Brett gets paid to insult Poms and make them hurt...what an awesome job
goonerfromjhb 2 months ago
apakan kalau kamu paham apa ku cakap like kalau inda aku bunuh kamu ok
amirul2011 2 months ago
Is it normal if I have a hard-on?
dunglebud 2 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@dunglebud yes it is normal to get a hard on or other wise you mid have a problem.
Inzar1928 2 months ago
@dunglebud If you are a queer I guess that's normal.
cire3000 1 month ago
Thumbs up if you skipped past the english bit
kiwilindz 2 months ago
england players are defenitely not the fittest.
fraserrrrrrrrrr 2 months ago
how the hell can American "Football" be compared to Rugby...Any tosspot could go out wrapped up like fecking robocop..rugby different gravy
darrenjamescox 2 months ago
The major flaw is that it is American football and therefore will not be played in other countries ever
NZENZN 2 months ago
@NZENZN its played in japan but this is a rugby video so please don't talk about football here :)
KyoXlp 2 months ago
How about we atop arguing about this shot. Face it American Football was developed solely from rugby, the decided to wear pads to stop their "injuries", and to show independence from the English (who most you Americans are demanded from) they introduced forward throwing. However the original sport of rugby is a far greater sport sue to it's history. We all know original sports are greater than their succeeders and today the NFL is purely a marketing tool, it is quiet obvious. Lastly the major f
NZENZN 2 months ago
@NZENZN
Just FYI Rugby originated from Football, not the other way around. It was sort of concieved at the school of Rugby when the guys were playing football (without pads, mind you) and one of the just started throwing the ball backwards constantly and it srt of caught on. I agree with your point, though.
EkkoGaming 2 months ago
@EkkoGaming
American football is just an importation of rugby. The first match of American football was played in 1869 and the rules was written in 1906. The oldest complete rugby roles are from 1845. Rugby originated from football-clubs and was called Rugby-football hence the name football in the US for the sissy-variation of the sport.
Profanum79 2 months ago 2
@Profanum79 rugby originated from football where William Webb ellis at Rugby School picked up the ball and ran with it.
SmilerHeath 2 months ago
@EkkoGaming What the fuck are you on about. Research it cunt on wikipedia. They were the same sport and split into rugby and association football,
NZENZN 2 months ago
@NZENZN
I'm pretty sure that's what I said... that they were the same sport and then one branched off from the other...
No need to be a complete asshole and throw around names.
EkkoGaming 2 months ago
@EkkoGaming you're getting confused between languages, It was made as an alternative to English football, what you would call Soccer.
ScottCoops1 1 month ago
this is too funny... just because we wear pads, football is less violent? there are far less hits in a rugby game since whenever a player comes up to hit em they pitch the ball to the next player... and by the way.. compare the size of a nfl player and a rugby player.. they will woop u
Beetoo221 2 months ago
@Beetoo221 a 'large' football player would get ruined by a rugby player. Sure you can stand there, but stand there while (back in the day) Jonah Lomu runs at him, Any of the Tuilagi brothers, SBW, Nonu or Umaga. Rugby is skill, they pass it to the next player to let the game FLOW. Something Americans don't understand, stopping and starting is so pointless. HEY NICE PADS ASSHOLE.
BadmanBailey1993 2 months ago
@BadmanBailey1993 people like you are just so lame
parkt6792 2 months ago
Rugby is a great game to play and to watch and i believe that football might be fun to play in it's own way, but in my opinion football is quite a boring game to watch. Football's just a theater with very few peak points which otherwise bores u to death.
VVeIiii 2 months ago
the day I see a rugby video that doesn't have a bunch of little trolls crying and bitching is the day ill be a very happy man. oh and badlerify you sound like a faggot.
25seo 2 months ago
@25seo
you'd have to grow to adulthood before you can do that kiddo... ;)
pootubeftw 2 months ago
hahaha far more deadly wtf its because you pussys wear pads you idiots the front 3 in a scrum obsorb over 4 ton of pressure every time the connect with the other team just take off the pussy pads AND a far more high impact game ever played is RUGBY LEAGUE
badlerify 2 months ago 3
rugby players are REAl MEN american football players are all PUSSYS with there pads and helmets they probably wear tampons too they cant tackle for shit and there ball carriers who run the ball and there receivers cant attack for shit yall should take that crap off and play with no pads and wtf is up with all the ass grabbing
badlerify 2 months ago 3
@badlerify Goddamn youre ignorant. I've played both, and people get laid the fuck out in both. You don't get concussions from love taps.
smithjohnson112 2 months ago
@badlerify i don't really prefer rugby to the NFL or vice versa...but an average NFL player is quicker, stronger and fitter than a rugby player. the worst running back in the NFL would probably be one of the best union players in the world if they switched codes (and downgraded their salary by about $10 million in the process)....just keeping it real...NFL players are wayyy better athletes
dsquaredmlg 2 months ago
@dsquaredmlg you are delusional, there is no way the average nfl player if fitter than a rugby player you have no idea how hard they train for fitness in the pre season. also i have been living in canada for about 3 months now, originally from australia. so there is a lot of nfl shown here, you do realise that someone like adrian peterson would not make a professional squad they lack the ball skills to make it. yet you think the worst rb would be the best rugby player...get real
tddog01 1 month ago
@tddog01 ball skills? i'm talking about pure talent and athleticism...if you compare bench, squat, deadlift max's and 10m, 20m sprints the NFL players would rape the rugby players. there's no talent in union. I know several professional union players from the reds...they are pretty unimpressive athletes...just heavy really
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg yeh i agree some unions players are that athletic but then there are the league players who are on a different level from union. a relative of mine actually plays in the NRL and he tells me of the fitness/weights regime they do its insane. players likes akuila uate, benji marshall, greg inglis, kevin locke, jarryd hayne, etc are just as athletic as any nfl playeer
tddog01 1 month ago
@tddog01 those players are good athletes, I agree, but still they can't touch nfl running backs, tight ends, etc. in speed, strength or agility. Look man who plays rugby really? Australia, New Zealand, some tiny islands in the Pacific - total populaton about 30 million people. The US has a population over 10 times that....there's just wayyy more talent there (plus lots of black dudes who are way faster and stronger and more athletic)...keep it real man
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg you're kinda forgetting about europeans playing rugby aswell. remember that the usa is the only country where nfl if actually played on a big scale. rugby union however is even in a small country like the netherlands growing every year.
Ingmarvanhemert 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg nfl football players can't do that for very long though. They need lots of rest in between.
thefreeflowification 1 month ago
@thefreeflowification its like you're trying to imply that American's can hang haha bitch please say something like that to Mike Tyson xD
ToNGanStuNNa650 1 month ago
@ToNGanStuNNa650 Freudian slip? I think you mean "can't hang"
Tyson was a boxer not a football player. You're comparing boxers, some of the fittest athletes in the world, to nfl players? LOL
thefreeflowification 1 month ago
@thefreeflowification since you talking shit about American football, get the off this American web site hmmm?
ToNGanStuNNa650 1 month ago
@ToNGanStuNNa650 lol what? There's no trolling here. Wide receivers running backs and saftey's there's no... lol omg please stop it it's new years eve. LOLOLOL
thefreeflowification 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg what does race have to do with being fit, and there is no comparison to the NFL and Rugby Sevens they are 2 different sports and played in different ways. Its like comparing judo to boxing there are some similarities and it requires fitness, but its a different sport.. anyways this is an old topic
maven21 1 month ago
@maven21 haha bro don't try to be all politically correct and shit...what does race have to do with athleticism? absolutely everything. here's a fun fact - the top 100 fastest times ever run in the 100m sprint were all run by sprinters of West African decent. All the sprinters in the last 10 100m olympic finals were of West African decent...that's why I say what I say...running backs in the NFL (most of whom are of west african decent) are faster and stronger and better athletes
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg dude there is not political correctness in anything and what you are seeing is just plain socioeconomics. The sports you describe are low investment so it natural that certain groups would be more represented in them and more numbers the higher you have of people who will excel Fencers are highly athletic, Motocross, equestrian sports, sailing, winter sports, list goes on that are most white, but they are world class athletes. Being an athlete is universal even if the access is not
maven21 1 month ago
@maven21 please stop dude....your comment makes no sense already. why are west africans quicker and more powerful (on average) than say, asians for example? because of evolution and the lifestyle their ancestors lived
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg so you mean to tell me that no European or Asian ran anywhere in their history, hunted, gathered meat for the tribe? German has one of the top teams in soccer and they have beat African teams all the time, And how come Asia is a powerhouse in marital arts if slower and weaker ? What makes no sense is for a resonable fellow like you seem to be would be hung up on something as trival as race as a basis for athletic performance. Its always about numbers and accessibility not race
maven21 1 month ago
@maven21 haha please stop fighting reality...u know how people say "white men can't jump"? there's a basis to that...it's called evolution. On average, people of west african decent are more powerful. Ethiopians are fitter (because of the fact that they were raised at high altitude), pacific islanders are heavier, stronger and put on weight easier (because they used to be hunter-gatherers). White people tolerate the cold better...all races are specialized to their environment
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg specalized to their environments yes...locked in...no. Of course if I lived in a higher altitude I would adapt, but what you a talking about is the basis of athletcs being based on race. First people move around all the time, next comes training and sports programs, next accessabiility to sport and numbers of participants to the sport national sport higher level of talent. and if you want make that bet on white men not jumping i will gladly take your money... love the debate BTW :-)
maven21 1 month ago
@maven21 na dude the accessibility argument basically goes out the window when you look at US sprinters...whites and blacks in the US have more or less the same opportunities to participate in sprinting but all their sprinters are black (I assume of West African decent). I don't know why West Africans are quicker man...something to do with the environment there I assume...but it's hard to fight fact...100 of the quickest 100m times EVER - all West African. that is no coincidence
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg come on man..you gotta look closer accessibility AND participation. Many talented white athletes choose not compete in the shorter distance events, while most of them are in the long distance, cross country, ect. So then what do you see higher numbers in the sprints, well naturally you are going to have more talented people. Jeremy Warner..gold medalist 400 meters is white, Athens a chinese guy won the 110m hurdles.How do you explain them? With your theroy that should not happen.
maven21 1 month ago
@maven21 the 400m and 110m hurdles are not power events...400m is a completely different type of fitness then the 100m sprint and hurdles rely a great deal on technique and flexibility - not just power. Plus I am not even saying that there aren't exceptions...who knows maybe one day a white guy will get in the 100m olympic final or even win it...but the fact remains that an overwhelming amount of sprinters are of West African decent...
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg Agreed but we differ in the source of that. You say race, I say participation and the fact that there are many execptions shows race is not the basis for success. Don't have to be black to run and don't have to be black to run well, but you do have to have elite training, athleticism and participation by large talent pool and of the 3. Two of them depend on socioeconomics and location where race does play a factor. No winter sports in Haiti and no summer sports in Norway.
maven21 1 month ago
@maven21 haha why do you keep saying participation and training? When I say athletes of "West African decent" I don't mean they were born in West Africa. Just that they have West African roots...they may be American, Jamaican, French, Dutch or anything by nationality and may represent those countries at the Olympics....so they have the EXACT same opportunities and training as white athletes in those countries...but they are still better. please explain why that is
dsquaredmlg 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg Years ago sports were segregated. If you looked at early basketball, baseball all the top athletes were white. You could say and people did that whites were better athletes, but it only reflected the lack of PARTICIPATION in the sport, not racial superiority. More blacks are in the sports but its due to higher levels of minorities and larger talent pool, but not due to any racial superiority. If it was just racial ability you would see more black fencers,divers,sailors,skiers, ect
maven21 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg look square don't get me wrong I see where you are coming from on this. but wars were fought, millions and millions of people died or were enslaved, and basic rights were denied many people over this whole racial superiority crap. It is not a compliment and only fosters hatred.I for one have learned the lessons that people have suffered for and recognize the contributions of many races. That is not political correct..its just correct
maven21 1 month ago
@maven21 there are summer sport in norway
snaxel3971 1 month ago
@snaxel3971 Thanks for the correction
maven21 1 month ago 4
@dsquaredmlg Most of the black guys we had in our unit when I was still serving with the Royal Marine Commando's were extremely LAZY and weren't particularly beast in combat over in Afghanistan, the white guys and British/Asians and Gurkhas were far better....Ben Cohen ,British born and Bred, English DESCENT Through and through , was for a few years the strongest athlete in Rugby...so,...why is that? You put everything down to race which is proven to be GARBAGE.
LCStreetPhotographer 2 weeks ago
@LCStreetPhotographer You just put everything down to race too "most black guys are lazy in the army" Hard to believe you would have been exposed to the majority of all black men in the army. I call bullshit.
Missleanneiscool 2 weeks ago
@dsquaredmlg When I left the military in 06 I attended the University of Portsmouth and studied for a degree, BSc (Hons) Sport and Exercise Science (reputed to be one of the best in the world for this particular degree course) and its a proven fact that there is now issue of one race being particularly superior to another. Most of it actually boils down to "environment or socio-economic background." Fact is most ethnic minorities use sport as a way to get off of the street. FACT.
LCStreetPhotographer 2 weeks ago
@dsquaredmlg I now work as a Sports Scientist and official Strength and Conditioning coach specialising in elite rugby players, boxers and track athletes with Lucozade Inc.
LCStreetPhotographer 2 weeks ago
@LCStreetPhotographer do you ever stop to take a break from patting yourself on the back? I get it, you can't accept reality/are borderline racist...your shitty qualifications don't impress me
dsquaredmlg 2 weeks ago
however sevens players generally would ice the majority of NFL players in terms of endurance even if what you say is true.
ScottCoops1 1 month ago
Comment removed
imnotemo14 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ScottCoops1 any rugby player would. I'd like to see any linesman run half as hard as a prop or lock for 80.
imnotemo14 1 month ago
@dsquaredmlg however even if what you say there is true I bet the average Rugby Union backrow forward (more flankers) would absolutely dick NFL players in terms of endurance because that's what they train for whereas in NFL its suited to short burst, high intensity. both sports have completely different forms of fitness
ScottCoops1 1 month ago
@badlerify Go tell any American footballer their a pussy to their face. I fucking dare you
kcougar12 1 month ago
what dickhead brought american football into a rugby sevens video. if you want to talk about ameerican football fuck off to an american football vid
nick47s5 2 months ago 2
STUPID GAME
celmcelm 2 months ago
Goldiney is a pathetic racist piece of shit. He gets a kick out of using hate speech toward people who do not share his worldview and people he knows nothing about. He is a closet faggot and that is why he was watching this video.
YoMama63366 2 months ago
These arguments are really stupid. The people who say American Football players are pansies for wearing pads need to watch more NFL and the people saying rugby players aren't tough need to watch more rugby. Rugby is an exhausting brutal sport, NFL players NEED to wear pads otherwise they'd literally be killed, paralyzed every game. They're two completely different sports, you all sound stupid.
JamesConroy92 2 months ago 3
When an average american football player hits a stationary person, that is equal to approx getting hit by a moving car traveling a little over 40 km per hour. A rugby player hits with significantly less than that. But each are hitting hard respective to their sport.
SaraAnne01 2 months ago
Football players need padding because they can't handle a tackle without it.....americans aren't as physically fit and don't have a healthy diet....other countries are more physically fit with a great diet so they don't have to lift weights to hit hard...they naturally can. Americans that play football typically are physically fit because they have to lift weights to get the job done during a game.....rugby players don't have to count on weights to help them win.
molliesue1234 2 months ago
@molliesue1234
And your comment might be dumbest of all. That's like me saying all Brits have horrible teeth, it's an old, stupid generalization. Most Americans are physically fit and care about their diets, and NFL players in particular are physical fucking anomalies. Anyone who wants to be bigger and stronger to hit harder needs to be on a weight lifting regimen, you don't pop out of the fucking womb 6'3 and 250 pounds of muscle. My lord you are dumb, read a fucking book or something.
JamesConroy92 2 months ago
Nah man rugbys way more of a hard mans sport. Football they wear pads and shit. And apparently some football players are giving rugby players credit as being more physical cause they wear no padding. Yea the may hit harder but take all the padding off and actually tackle and c how that goes.
sharrydoggz 2 months ago