What's the choice? You think "liberals" prefer to surrender? That seems to be what RR is saying. What's a "liberal? Who's a liberal. Name names. What makes them a "liberal?" Ted Kennedy was the only liberal I know. Who else calls themselves "liberal?" Are "liberals" against the oil wars? If so, then I'm for liberals.
I saw that speech in '64. I didn't even know who this guy was. But I liked him for the speech. Would RR have invaded Iraq and now Afghanistan? I bet not.
"a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties."
I think your ad hominem masks your blatant and intentional misdirection of ignorance.
A liberal is a communist. Communism is the enemy to free people.
You don't make a lot of sense. You obviously don't even know what "ad hominem" means, since you used it wrong. I didn't know, but I looked it up. I don't try to use big words to impress people. I don't know if liberals are communist or not, but I doubt they are, anymore than conservatives are fascists, also the enemy to free people. Which is what I am, unlike you. It's always a time for choosing, until you meet your Maker. Then you answer for all you did. Following orders will be no excuse.
@EveryMn No. I don't know, and you don't either. "Statements about what would have been are no less certain, only less verifiable, than statements about what will be." Edward Teller. I doubt Reagan would have invaded Iraq for lots of reasons. Above all, he didn't. It's un-Christian, it's aggression, and puts the US in with the bad guys of history. I say it's a bad mistake. But that's never stopped the military. Guess we have to stay tuned to find out.
Thanks for posting this important speech! I've been sending them out to family and friends in an attempt to remind them that there are stark differences between what once was and what we have now. It appears a whole generation may be lost if they are not introduced to, and understand the choice, and how important this choices is!
What's the choice? You think "liberals" prefer to surrender? That seems to be what RR is saying. What's a "liberal? Who's a liberal. Name names. What makes them a "liberal?" Ted Kennedy was the only liberal I know. Who else calls themselves "liberal?" Are "liberals" against the oil wars? If so, then I'm for liberals.
I saw that speech in '64. I didn't even know who this guy was. But I liked him for the speech. Would RR have invaded Iraq and now Afghanistan? I bet not.
keepaopenmind 2 years ago
Liberalism -
"a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties."
I think your ad hominem masks your blatant and intentional misdirection of ignorance.
A liberal is a communist. Communism is the enemy to free people.
turisas1234 2 years ago
You don't make a lot of sense. You obviously don't even know what "ad hominem" means, since you used it wrong. I didn't know, but I looked it up. I don't try to use big words to impress people. I don't know if liberals are communist or not, but I doubt they are, anymore than conservatives are fascists, also the enemy to free people. Which is what I am, unlike you. It's always a time for choosing, until you meet your Maker. Then you answer for all you did. Following orders will be no excuse.
keepaopenmind 2 years ago
You and I know that Reagan would've been in Iraq faster than Bush would.
EveryMn 2 years ago
Comment removed
troubledownbelowsir 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EveryMn No. I don't know, and you don't either. "Statements about what would have been are no less certain, only less verifiable, than statements about what will be." Edward Teller. I doubt Reagan would have invaded Iraq for lots of reasons. Above all, he didn't. It's un-Christian, it's aggression, and puts the US in with the bad guys of history. I say it's a bad mistake. But that's never stopped the military. Guess we have to stay tuned to find out.
troubledownbelowsir 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this important speech! I've been sending them out to family and friends in an attempt to remind them that there are stark differences between what once was and what we have now. It appears a whole generation may be lost if they are not introduced to, and understand the choice, and how important this choices is!
Audreysstone 3 years ago