So, this process is used on an idling engine...what does this do: does it decoke the turbine blades and turbine housing? I can see the benefits in that, definitely. Are any other systems improved?
@SenorSpode I don't think they ever pushed the fuel levers forward, Looks as if they just used the air pressure generated from the APU to spin the engine as if it were a starting cycle. Then as the engine spun, they sprayed chemicals to clean out the N1-N2 compressors and all the other engine parts, then released the pressure valve. If the engine were Idling, there would have been alot more heat and steam coming from the rear exit portion of the engine.
@scotplane Basically. They spin the compressor cores using compressed air. It takes roughly 600psi to fully start one of these engines. All they did here in this video was initiate the start cylce minus the fuel pump switches and throttle advance. If you have enough air, you could spin it all day long like this and nothing would ever happen without adding fuel. You'd get heat from the engine because the air is being compressed, but no combustion or super heated gases, which makes this possible,
@flanksteak2 Does it same more fuel or cut more emissions then a non environmentally friendly wash? Is this just how they wash them? I though the big deal was that they are using a new method but maybe I’m misunderstanding. They claim they will same 20 mil in fuel. I appreciate your explination.
@Pooshooter5k The reduced emissions and fuel consumption are a result of the washing. Engines are not normally washed unless they are going to be serviced. The crux is that they have a new system and are going to wash the engines more frequently.
The "environmentally friendly" part is emphasized as sidebar.
The wash itself is being advertised as better than the old style wash systems because it recycles the water and traps the contaminants being washed out of the engine.
Inside the engines are tiny mexicans. They spin the fan. Every so often one dies and falls into the high pressure blades, and must be washed out. You can tell cause the wash water is brown. hahahaha
Okay, First off they are motoring the engine. This is not for the fan you see at the front of the engine. it's for the CORE of the engine. That fan produces 80 percent of the thrust but it's spun by the low pressure turbine at the rear which is spun by the high pressure turbine from the core of the engine with the combustions. Motoring the core is spinning probably about 20-25 percent RPM. Also the engines are designed to throw stuff outside and around the core.
This is why they use this specially designed sprayer to clean out the compressors. The engine is motored (starter provides the air to spool up the core but no fuel is added to ignite and Start the engine) and then the sprayers actually spray and clean the core. I believe there IS a mild detergent in the water. Go google how High bypass turbofan's work and you'll see what I'm talking about.
Vagina and anal probing is the way to go to keep us safe from the terrorists! Drugsmuglers use the ass or vagina. Imagine how much C4 a terrorist can stack up there The terrorist will go undetected on the plane and we will risk a new 9/11. I would not mind being checked in my ass before flying. Only those that have something to hide will avoid the anus/vagina checking.
If you want to fly. Have your ass and vagina checked first! It should be mandatory for everyone
Can somebody explain to me how in the hell sitting static, at low RPM, and blasting water (unless there's a cleaner mixed in) cleans the turbines? Flying under max power, or near cruise speed, under a heavy rainstorm probably cleans the turbine just as much if not more.
The public needs to be aware of Pratt & Whitney Aircraft/United Technologies Corporations illegal behavior. In particular, attempting to provoke this caring and devoted father into committing suicide over my child care issues and then conspiring to obstruct justice in federal court against not only me, but in addition 4 other litigants/former UTC employees. Please check out my You Tube videos to find my website and genuine court documents.
Perhaps you should check out my You Tube videos to learn about P&WA’s heinous illegal activities. P&WA/UTC is absolutely ruthless as they destroy many families here in CT
@davidathomas42 Well i think it should have been to u. I mean i think u really don't know on how much is involved maintaining an aircraft. So appreciate the work they do. I mean as a pilot and and LAME i know both sides and working on aircarft is so much harder then a 35knot cross wind landing. So i always thank my LAME (Licensed Aircraft Mechanical Engineer) on the 2:30am work in winter they do so i can fly my aircraft. I mean this video should show the work we do.
Wow your cool! can I come hang out with you while you fly 737-800's for Delta. Maybe when you get furloughed you can come fly them for Southwest..... NOT!!!!
@izanti lol not even close, not even the right side of the planet!, the world is bigger that the great US of A! but unfortunately you guys have such small minds unless there is an oil field there to steal you would not know where places are
This coming from the guy who flies an AMERICAN built airplane. Tell you what, leave the hard engineering to us and we will keep stealing the worlds oil. You must have a really small asian dick to be bragging on youtube that you fly 737's which only leads me to believe that you don't. I fly jets two but I don't go blatantly blasting it here. So im guessing your European, British perhaps or at least a British airline? Gotta Love Government funded/started companies like AIRBUS
for all the people here if you don't know something don't post anything to start with if you didn't wash the engines there would be more carbon emissions into the air ever since the introduction of the cfm56-7 fuel cost has been cut by 25 percent with the installation of the winglets another 20 perecent by washing the engines another 15-20 percent by taxiing the with one engine another 15 perecents so you are cutting roughly 100 percent of emissions into the air airplanes don't pollute that much
No washing the engine cleans out contaminates from the combustion chamber and surrounding areas increasing engine performance and an fuel consumption... approx 2%
Basically...cleaning the engine to help burn less fuel in flight :)
@Spamolot2888 how much does it cost them to do the engine washing? Do they get pro's to do it or do they have people in the company that are trained and have the machinery?
Sounds like Pratt & Whitney is taking a play from the Jiffy Lube playbook. "If we flush you engine with this stuff you will get more power and better fuel economy." In the end, it just doesn't do anything.
@ATLOffroad they are not selling to the dumb general public who believe any bullshit they are told without seeing scientifically proven results. the airline would test for themselves with proven positive results being obtained before committing to a multi-year deal.
@TheAllha I work for P&WC. Compressor washes can decrease your inter-turbine temperature by 10-15 degrees on the smaller turbines we make. It can add hundreds or thousands of hours between your Hot Section Inspections when done right and frequently enough.
Oh, no! The engine flush guys are goin' after the airlines now that the auto industry is in the shitter. I guess Southwest is the only airline holding its' nose above water.
Interesting the information states an agreement with Pratt & Whitney when the only engines fitted to the wings of a 737 series aircraft are GE CFM56-7B series engines
2. A340-600 is 100 times better and longer than 777-300 ER because of having
four engines and better technology.
3. A320 is 50,000 times better and safer than 737. Boeing only could produce aircraft of size of a 737. Airbus produced A319, A320, A321, A322, A310, A300-B4.
4. And of coarse my trump card A380 beats 747-8 and entire Boeing family!
@fachy1981 There is no A322, and A310 and A300 are widebodies, so they are not in the same category as the 737. Furthermore, the 737 comes in five different sizes, 737-500, -600, -700, -800, -900.
@fachy1981 um... must be tough to use wikipedia... If you had you would find that Airbus has sold 374 A 340s... Boeing has sold 864. Guess the airlines don't seem to agree with you. The 777 ER is the longest range commercial airliner built. Guinness says so. More than 1,500 747's built. The new -8 model flys for less cost than the A 380 per passenger mile, holds just 30 less passengers, yet can fly hundreds more airports than the A380 will ever be able to. It weighs too much.
As to 4 engines vs. 2 I guess you know better than the FAA, thousands of hours of testing, and review of all accidents to date. If four are so important, why does Airbus make two engine aircraft? Guess those are unsafe too in your book. Read up on Boeing - from business jets for a dozen to 747s that haul 515. Boeing has built 2,3, and 4 engine aircraft, and the military still is flying the 8 engine B-52. Even with delays, The new Dreamliner is still 3 years ahead of anything Airbus offers.
lol AA clean the engine don't need this kind of the machine.... sounds south west washing engine take too long. AA clean engine don't need those staffs. lol too many man power lol haha
@20jimmy200 Couldn't they have just put a guy in front of the engine spraying a hose at it and say they cleaned it? They can use sewer water and claim to be ecofriendly for recycling water.
This comment is assigned to every1 who thinks that Airbus is a copy of Boeing. You try to design a plane that does not look like any Airbus, or Boeing. The Airbus company made the A380 in 2004, because airliners asked Airbus to do so. It was built to replace the Boeing 747. And please, today when we need to think about the environment. How could Airbus not make a plane similar to the B787? Besides, neither of them makes turboprop planes.
As a passenger I´m concerned just about safety...until composite planes proves to be as reliable as Aluminum then I´ll be satisfied
Until now, and following B787´s development, it has all chances of being a new kind of Mass Destruction Weapon
Boeing had NOT performed any kind of Repetitive fatigue testing on 787´s Wings, nor measured the impact of the stresses the winbox will have to cope: that will lend to catastrophic cracking events as far as I´m concerned
@fachy1981 How would you know Boeing DIDN'T test anything. The A350 is still in development. And the 787 made it's first commercial flight to London. And the A350 looks like an exact copy of the 787 except the engines, and the livery.
@TopGun904 ...it doesnt matter that the A350 is still in development... the A380 was the big project in Europe while the 787 was being developed in the US... and now the A380 is up and running... look whos late to the party!! (B787) ... the A350 was not being developed at the same stage as the 787... and for good reason.
@temanatahiti Airbus headquarters is in Europe dumb nut. Boeing is in Seattle...
Airbus thought that a bigger big-ass plane is better, just to show Boeing off with their 747. And fachy1981 started this whole thread when I just said, ''Hooray for the Boeing 737!''
@TopGun904 ... well done, the Airbus headquarters is indeed in Europe! Well done!! Jesus.And Boeing is actually headquartered in Chicago dumb-fuck... Airbus did not build the A380 just to size up to the Boeing 747... or else they would have built the A380 years ago?? Does that make sense to you?? They built the A380 in reply to market demands for larger aircraft for use on denser routes... Why do americans always feel threatened by Airbus? There is a whole other world outside the US you know.
@TopGun904 ...and When I said 'Ever heard of EADS... they are headquartered in Europe'... I was refering to the parent company of Airbus.... dumb nut. EADS also owns a variety of companies who build spacecraft, the eurofighter, missiles, satelites etc.
A380 rules in terms of comfort economy, technological advancements an most importantly the ability to generate profits for airlines. A380 clearly beats 747-8 in every category. It even performs better than they expected and Airbus are improving this all the time with weight saving advances. There is such a thing as being proud of Boeing, but using baseless lies and phony facts is appalling. I like all aircraft but you give credit where credit is due.
@SkyWestCRJPilot Airbus is nothing more than a bunch of companies that had melted inside this pan-European consortium...some of them are older than Boeing...and even battled in WWII
Airbus is the PIONEER in aviation composites...Boeing had zero THAT´S WHY OUTSOURCED their 787 composite building (80%) out of America: Japanese composite Wings and centerframe, Italian composite fuselage, etc...
@fachy1981 Most American WWII planes were Lockheed Martin, which was bought by Boeing, and there isn't a commercial airliner that wasn't made without other countries help. Boeing and Airbus get their parts and assemble them in the 'assembly' plant. But even though Airbus wanted to think bigger is better that's why they made their big-ass A380, just to make a bigger plane than Boeing. Boeing had the right idea with the 787, people want luxury.
@fachy1981 Airbus is the one copying all Boeing's ideas, when the 747-400 came out, Airbus just wanted to show them off by making the A380. When the 787 came out, Airbus "built" the A350, also with wing curve from the 787! Btw, the A350 isn't even finished yet. And all WWII Bombers (B-17s) were Boeing!!
@fachy1981 The 787 has sold tons more than the A350... Like about, I dunno, 892 MORE orders!! Airbus sold only 300 of your XWB planes, and those are PRE-ORDERS, no one know how it will really perform. THE PLANE ISN'T EVEN FINISHED or made it FIRST takeoff!! And the 787 engines have a specially designed engine to reduce noise. As long as Airbus didn't copy that, I'm OK.
Boeing built 4/6 the Allied Forces WWII planes. The other 2/6 of the Allied Forces Were from other countries, and they mostly..
@TopGun904 Boeing is now 10 years behind Airbus. Airlines that use the 747-400 will be looking to upgrade in the near future and it seems that A380 is the more popular choice. Airlines don't just want another 747 derivative. They want a completely new airliner.
Now with the delays of 787, it seems A350 will enter the market 2-3 years after 787 which should make for an interesting market. A350 can also take advantage of building second making A350 with slightly better technologies than 787.
Imagine if that thing turned on....
ColonialDagger 2 weeks ago
did that engine just take a drug test?
GrenadeCatcher 2 months ago
Pretty fancy looking rig for what amounts to a hose.
bagelboi66 2 months ago
that fat guy got the plane's poop!
saifawis 2 months ago
I didnt even know they did things like this to jet engines, learned something new today.
brumuda66 3 months ago
The guy at 1:56 is like "Shit im staying in here!"
diegodaudt 3 months ago
That guy sounds right like Cleveland out of Family Guy.
shaunsprogress 4 months ago
@shaunsprogress And almost looks like Cleveland...
regislafayette77 4 weeks ago
Here is an easier, cheaper way to wash jet engine, land and speed above sea till water penetrates engine as airplane float-speed.
Axmedkoole 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i got a lot of videos on ontario airport including the old terminals (terminal 1) so check it out on my channel
brothuhmuc 4 months ago
those engines seem small but if you're close the're look to be real hudge
rangelso 5 months ago
very good video
fanmanu1000 5 months ago
sweet
fanmanu1000 5 months ago
and then give full power!!
mjdronrijp 5 months ago
wow that is so cool
NadiaZharkikh 5 months ago
why go to the plane wash when you can just fly around in the rain?
161803 5 months ago
Thats how they make the coffee on board.
It tastes nearly the same.
TheOneR4Y 6 months ago
So, this process is used on an idling engine...what does this do: does it decoke the turbine blades and turbine housing? I can see the benefits in that, definitely. Are any other systems improved?
SenorSpode 6 months ago
@SenorSpode I don't think they ever pushed the fuel levers forward, Looks as if they just used the air pressure generated from the APU to spin the engine as if it were a starting cycle. Then as the engine spun, they sprayed chemicals to clean out the N1-N2 compressors and all the other engine parts, then released the pressure valve. If the engine were Idling, there would have been alot more heat and steam coming from the rear exit portion of the engine.
FujiR500 5 months ago 7
@FujiR500 Id say your right, looks like there just spooling on Pneumatic air from the APU...
mwethereld 3 months ago
@FujiR500 So they put the starter switch continuous or flight and just left the fuel cut off off?
scotplane 3 weeks ago
@scotplane Basically. They spin the compressor cores using compressed air. It takes roughly 600psi to fully start one of these engines. All they did here in this video was initiate the start cylce minus the fuel pump switches and throttle advance. If you have enough air, you could spin it all day long like this and nothing would ever happen without adding fuel. You'd get heat from the engine because the air is being compressed, but no combustion or super heated gases, which makes this possible,
FujiR500 3 weeks ago
@FujiR500 Great if the hangers cold! XD
scotplane 3 weeks ago
the swirl painted on the propeller in the engine really entertained me x]
TheSkyper20 6 months ago
This system eliminates the nausea experienced by the older method of having a man inside with a sponge.
billt460 6 months ago
Washing my dog would have been more interesting.
niceuser1234 6 months ago
How does this save "save on fuel and cut carbon emissions."?
Pooshooter5k 6 months ago
@Pooshooter5k more dirt=more weight=more fuel need to power plane=more carbon emissions.
SABlingBling 6 months ago
@Pooshooter5k It gets carbon off the engine parts that interferes with airflow.
flanksteak2 6 months ago
@flanksteak2 Does it same more fuel or cut more emissions then a non environmentally friendly wash? Is this just how they wash them? I though the big deal was that they are using a new method but maybe I’m misunderstanding. They claim they will same 20 mil in fuel. I appreciate your explination.
Pooshooter5k 6 months ago
@Pooshooter5k The reduced emissions and fuel consumption are a result of the washing. Engines are not normally washed unless they are going to be serviced. The crux is that they have a new system and are going to wash the engines more frequently.
The "environmentally friendly" part is emphasized as sidebar.
The wash itself is being advertised as better than the old style wash systems because it recycles the water and traps the contaminants being washed out of the engine.
flanksteak2 6 months ago
@flanksteak2 Ok thank you for the clarification. I thought they were washed regularly anyway.
Pooshooter5k 6 months ago
Inside the engines are tiny mexicans. They spin the fan. Every so often one dies and falls into the high pressure blades, and must be washed out. You can tell cause the wash water is brown. hahahaha
madisonelectronic 7 months ago
@madisonelectronic How is that remotely funny?
Zirnon 6 months ago
Why don't they just run a line directly from the engine to the on-board coffee maker?
gpost2800 7 months ago
I take it that's with the engine starter engaged but not the fuel, right?
jsd23 7 months ago
@jsd23 Yep, ignition is disabled and the fuel switch is in cutoff so no fuel is entering inside the engine.
Thrillho123 7 months ago
Ha! i bet on regular washings it's two guys with a garden hose! This is just publicity BS!!!
slipsilversliver 7 months ago
Hey while that guy cleans the engine someone else should repair the cracks in all those SouthWest planes. Worst airliner.
prutyladyd07 7 months ago
when the engine is spinning at that speed at 2:12 is even a small jet blast being pushed out of the back?
infernodood3 8 months ago
@infernodood3 Its about as strong as a big gust of wind, you can do simple leak checks standing by the engine with it running like that.
Thrillho123 7 months ago
@infernodood3
Nope.
devrajvarma 6 months ago
Okay, First off they are motoring the engine. This is not for the fan you see at the front of the engine. it's for the CORE of the engine. That fan produces 80 percent of the thrust but it's spun by the low pressure turbine at the rear which is spun by the high pressure turbine from the core of the engine with the combustions. Motoring the core is spinning probably about 20-25 percent RPM. Also the engines are designed to throw stuff outside and around the core.
FunktasticLucky 8 months ago
This is why they use this specially designed sprayer to clean out the compressors. The engine is motored (starter provides the air to spool up the core but no fuel is added to ignite and Start the engine) and then the sprayers actually spray and clean the core. I believe there IS a mild detergent in the water. Go google how High bypass turbofan's work and you'll see what I'm talking about.
FunktasticLucky 8 months ago
i m a part of the founding family and we run and own it
Thekingswa747 8 months ago
@Thekingswa747 Yeah ok wanna run some more bull shit
Brian567899 8 months ago
Isnt it a CFM56 7B?? With the gearbox on the left side? Thats why the engine inst round!
YellowDrummerQueen 8 months ago
WTF
L2yCew 9 months ago
looks like bat food..
metallisabbath 9 months ago
lol at 32 listen closely theres a chicken clucking
midnightrider1233 9 months ago 34
@midnightrider1233 you are silly =P
Emoegyptian027 2 months ago
@midnightrider1233 Nope that's just a chicken-head girl giggling
sbranson01 1 month ago
@midnightrider1233 Yeah she did sound like a chicken.
FujiR500 3 weeks ago
this is really boring...
jbergman311 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Vagina and anal probing is the way to go to keep us safe from the terrorists! Drugsmuglers use the ass or vagina. Imagine how much C4 a terrorist can stack up there The terrorist will go undetected on the plane and we will risk a new 9/11. I would not mind being checked in my ass before flying. Only those that have something to hide will avoid the anus/vagina checking.
If you want to fly. Have your ass and vagina checked first! It should be mandatory for everyone
RadioIlluminaticom 9 months ago
Can somebody explain to me how in the hell sitting static, at low RPM, and blasting water (unless there's a cleaner mixed in) cleans the turbines? Flying under max power, or near cruise speed, under a heavy rainstorm probably cleans the turbine just as much if not more.
thechoosendude 9 months ago
@thechoosendude You should call Southwest right away and offer your advice. I'm sure they never thought of that.
HasaanFatal 9 months ago
why doesnt the pilot give full speed?? *-* would be way more fun... not?
Smoothylanding 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The public needs to be aware of Pratt & Whitney Aircraft/United Technologies Corporations illegal behavior. In particular, attempting to provoke this caring and devoted father into committing suicide over my child care issues and then conspiring to obstruct justice in federal court against not only me, but in addition 4 other litigants/former UTC employees. Please check out my You Tube videos to find my website and genuine court documents.
silvertiger333 9 months ago
whats that little white swirly thing on the center of the engine?
rextar23 10 months ago
@rextar23 Those fans spin so fast, that a ground crew member might think its not running and would not take as much caution. Its there for safety.
tomtimex 9 months ago
@rextar23 its an illusion
dileeppenmetsa 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Perhaps you should check out my You Tube videos to learn about P&WA’s heinous illegal activities. P&WA/UTC is absolutely ruthless as they destroy many families here in CT
silvertiger333 10 months ago
I wouldn't drink this.
k3bab 10 months ago
Just an expensive way to make coffee!
mrracer98 10 months ago
Just an expensive way to make coffee!
mrracer98 10 months ago
Just an expensive way to make coffee!
mrracer98 10 months ago
looks like chocolate
riyanla 10 months ago
i never new they did that
aqualtisking2 11 months ago
Hugh No heads break off ?
It sucks. Not only literally :)
gathersteel 11 months ago
ew that water must have bits of dirt, old fuel, and lots of other crap in it!
ghettoperson257 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We hit it off so well after another visit busizz4me.info
geratmathew 11 months ago
Did that smell like Engine Coffee to me.... ? lol
jetairteam 11 months ago 2
@jetairteam good old engine coffee to wake you up in the more.. with the jet fuel it should b able to keep awake for24 hours or more.
yoyoyoyoshua 11 months ago
Thats 3mins of my life I will never get back!
I fly B738's and thought this would be of interest, clearly not!
davidathomas42 11 months ago
@davidathomas42 Well i think it should have been to u. I mean i think u really don't know on how much is involved maintaining an aircraft. So appreciate the work they do. I mean as a pilot and and LAME i know both sides and working on aircarft is so much harder then a 35knot cross wind landing. So i always thank my LAME (Licensed Aircraft Mechanical Engineer) on the 2:30am work in winter they do so i can fly my aircraft. I mean this video should show the work we do.
jezz581 11 months ago 2
@jezz581 I know and do take an interest,, that video was neither interesting or informative.
davidathomas42 11 months ago
@davidathomas42
Wow your cool! can I come hang out with you while you fly 737-800's for Delta. Maybe when you get furloughed you can come fly them for Southwest..... NOT!!!!
izanti 11 months ago
@izanti lol not even close, not even the right side of the planet!, the world is bigger that the great US of A! but unfortunately you guys have such small minds unless there is an oil field there to steal you would not know where places are
davidathomas42 11 months ago
@davidathomas42
This coming from the guy who flies an AMERICAN built airplane. Tell you what, leave the hard engineering to us and we will keep stealing the worlds oil. You must have a really small asian dick to be bragging on youtube that you fly 737's which only leads me to believe that you don't. I fly jets two but I don't go blatantly blasting it here. So im guessing your European, British perhaps or at least a British airline? Gotta Love Government funded/started companies like AIRBUS
izanti 11 months ago
Do the TSA Zombies touch these guy's junk before they're let onto the airplanes?
DancingSpiderman 11 months ago
Why so many people just standing around?
HateGovernment 11 months ago
for all the people here if you don't know something don't post anything to start with if you didn't wash the engines there would be more carbon emissions into the air ever since the introduction of the cfm56-7 fuel cost has been cut by 25 percent with the installation of the winglets another 20 perecent by washing the engines another 15-20 percent by taxiing the with one engine another 15 perecents so you are cutting roughly 100 percent of emissions into the air airplanes don't pollute that much
767400ER1 1 year ago
Out of curiosity, how much improvement is this over flying routes with persistent precipitation?
R5H4D0W 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We hit it off so well after another visit busizz4me.info
ayasadisanyaka 1 year ago
wow it would suck for the person who thought that was a cup of coffee
madmax2069 1 year ago
$50 to whomever drinks that brown stuff
stephmc111 1 year ago
so you use an eco friendly powerwasher... to clean an engine that pollutes the air faster than you can say AL GORE? hmmm... good thinking guys!
8justin88 1 year ago
and that's my friends, is how they prepare coffee to be served in the cabin....
ermollejuo 1 year ago 80
nah its usin the startup system to spin the turbine no fuel is injected....
Giannis25307 1 year ago 2
@Giannis25307
Starters don't rotate the turbo fan that quickly. During start up, the fan doesn't spin that much until light off.
pmgodfrey 1 year ago
the hech?!
metra0808 1 year ago
whats the point of engine washing.. just fly around in the rain
hello1233280 1 year ago 2
@hello1233280
No washing the engine cleans out contaminates from the combustion chamber and surrounding areas increasing engine performance and an fuel consumption... approx 2%
Basically...cleaning the engine to help burn less fuel in flight :)
Spamolot2888 1 year ago
@Spamolot2888 how much does it cost them to do the engine washing? Do they get pro's to do it or do they have people in the company that are trained and have the machinery?
hello1233280 1 year ago
Need to marry you **busizz4me.info**
mayakanthineela 1 year ago
hate to be the guy at 1:23
will79601 1 year ago
@will79601 Why coz u think it might SUCK u in ?
smartdon007 1 year ago
@smartdon007 uh yea!
will79601 1 year ago
2:47 i guess that thing brews coffee too...
TheEgg185 1 year ago
thos engines are so close to the ground. it would suck a wing sheer at 20 feet!
777fsx200 1 year ago
keep your turbines clean
GottfriedvonCramm 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
It is a good day try to find good Russain girl gettop5.info
JeraldIrving 1 year ago
2:45 "Let's have a drink" lol
Convict147 1 year ago 3
@Convict147 thats what i was thinkin.
TheEgg185 1 year ago
and that my friends is served on-board as tea
LTF85199 1 year ago 9
Was müssen denn da 30 Leute rumstehen, nur weil da ein Triebwerk gewaschen wird?`?? xD
boeing1125 1 year ago
American efficiency @ it best.
was fur arslocher ... hahaha . die sind nur faul, hast ja den fetten gesehen
hahaha
naturalyshocked 1 year ago
@naturalyshocked all i see on this page is you trolling. get a life... wtf 5 comments on one page? really?
iAirsoft69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sex toy and AIRPLANE VIDS on my channel just uploaded a new video of expressjet check it out subscribe
brothuhmuc 1 year ago
Sounds like Pratt & Whitney is taking a play from the Jiffy Lube playbook. "If we flush you engine with this stuff you will get more power and better fuel economy." In the end, it just doesn't do anything.
ATLOffroad 1 year ago
@ATLOffroad they are not selling to the dumb general public who believe any bullshit they are told without seeing scientifically proven results. the airline would test for themselves with proven positive results being obtained before committing to a multi-year deal.
TheAllha 1 year ago
@TheAllha I work for P&WC. Compressor washes can decrease your inter-turbine temperature by 10-15 degrees on the smaller turbines we make. It can add hundreds or thousands of hours between your Hot Section Inspections when done right and frequently enough.
pw35226 1 year ago
2:50 thats where they get your in flight coke
puffaliciouschester 1 year ago 2
Oh, no! The engine flush guys are goin' after the airlines now that the auto industry is in the shitter. I guess Southwest is the only airline holding its' nose above water.
Hogums 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SO GOOD ABOUT SOUTHWEST!??!?!?!!?
FlyJetBlueAirways 1 year ago
@FlyJetBlueAirways what so good about jet blue?
will79601 1 year ago
0:26 check out that ass!!! Even the women are fat!
Kg277 1 year ago
I bet that makes good colonge.
metallica71787 1 year ago
Interesting the information states an agreement with Pratt & Whitney when the only engines fitted to the wings of a 737 series aircraft are GE CFM56-7B series engines
booman606 1 year ago 20
@booman606 ECOPower by Pratt & Whitney is contracted by SWA to accomplish the engine washes. They do this for all types of engines not just Pratts.
mtech 1 year ago
@booman606 I smell sabotage by P&W! DON'T CLEAN THOSE ENGINES!!!!
Peacekeeper2403 1 year ago
@booman606
737FSPilot 10 months ago
@booman606 that's not true, if it's a 737-100/200 they have Pratt&Whitney JT8D's
atvman101 9 months ago
@atvman101 Yea, thats true but seeing a -100, or -200 series 37 is such a rare sight today and I think WN has retired all their -200's
booman606 9 months ago
this is like engine flush for airplanes .. just wondering if they need it as clouds in the sky could do the job .
TeDuaMalakie 1 year ago
yeah, but apperently not
naturalyshocked 1 year ago
yeah that fat bloke last week n alf left alot of blood on my starboard engine. ask these fellas mate they'l sort it out.
parklife4130 1 year ago
if he got sucked in,,, the only thing that will remain in tact are his balls..
dexter12322222222222 1 year ago
I sure do wish SWA would get some connection planes.
bluepanther1011 1 year ago
@bluepanther1011 Or some 747's. That would be sick.
Musket300 1 year ago
@Musket300 Id rather have some CRJs at Bluegrass Airport
bluepanther1011 1 year ago
world biggest dishwasher, fairy washing up liquid will leave your insides clean and smooth
westonsuperphotos 1 year ago
I really really hope WN decides to fly to Canada. There's tons of routes that they could fly out of YYZ, YUL, YVR, and maybe even YYC.
KBCC3 1 year ago
i luv the cfm56's
P8NTBALL60 1 year ago
how ofter are they cleaned
colinprprpr 1 year ago
2:45 No wonder why my Starbucks tastes like shit!!!!
AviationTech2 1 year ago
All passengers, attention please! Now the plane's engine is having coffee and it'll be ready for the next flight in a minute.
kozeel 1 year ago
1.A330 is better than 767
2. A340-600 is 100 times better and longer than 777-300 ER because of having
four engines and better technology.
3. A320 is 50,000 times better and safer than 737. Boeing only could produce aircraft of size of a 737. Airbus produced A319, A320, A321, A322, A310, A300-B4.
4. And of coarse my trump card A380 beats 747-8 and entire Boeing family!
fachy1981 1 year ago
@fachy1981 There is no A322, and A310 and A300 are widebodies, so they are not in the same category as the 737. Furthermore, the 737 comes in five different sizes, 737-500, -600, -700, -800, -900.
istvanklein 1 year ago
@fachy1981 um... must be tough to use wikipedia... If you had you would find that Airbus has sold 374 A 340s... Boeing has sold 864. Guess the airlines don't seem to agree with you. The 777 ER is the longest range commercial airliner built. Guinness says so. More than 1,500 747's built. The new -8 model flys for less cost than the A 380 per passenger mile, holds just 30 less passengers, yet can fly hundreds more airports than the A380 will ever be able to. It weighs too much.
hacknflack 1 year ago
As to 4 engines vs. 2 I guess you know better than the FAA, thousands of hours of testing, and review of all accidents to date. If four are so important, why does Airbus make two engine aircraft? Guess those are unsafe too in your book. Read up on Boeing - from business jets for a dozen to 747s that haul 515. Boeing has built 2,3, and 4 engine aircraft, and the military still is flying the 8 engine B-52. Even with delays, The new Dreamliner is still 3 years ahead of anything Airbus offers.
hacknflack 1 year ago
@fachy1981 dude, you're a dope. go learn something about aviation before you use your loosely-based opinions as facts.
felixfelicis888 1 year ago
@fachy1981 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Sure pal.
SCE2AUX 9 months ago
lol AA clean the engine don't need this kind of the machine.... sounds south west washing engine take too long. AA clean engine don't need those staffs. lol too many man power lol haha
weishisfo 1 year ago
Why is it scary to me...
Seems like it's gonna suck me in...
20jimmy200 1 year ago 24
@20jimmy200
Because it can on full throttle if you stand too close to it. But it wasn't barely on idling power even.
DragonFlyback256 1 year ago
@20jimmy200 it will.. if you go in front of it at the wrong time when the power is up... and it will chew you up and spit you out too..
NeoQuello 1 year ago
@20jimmy200 I know right. I always think they will explode. It scares me, I could never do that.
dennyfrontier 1 year ago
@20jimmy200 its going to suck me in!!!!!!!
metra0808 1 year ago
@20jimmy200
Don't get sucked in !
jbjumpback 1 year ago
@20jimmy200 Couldn't they have just put a guy in front of the engine spraying a hose at it and say they cleaned it? They can use sewer water and claim to be ecofriendly for recycling water.
Peacekeeper2403 1 year ago
@20jimmy200
I would feel the same way
pandzik 10 months ago
This comment is assigned to every1 who thinks that Airbus is a copy of Boeing. You try to design a plane that does not look like any Airbus, or Boeing. The Airbus company made the A380 in 2004, because airliners asked Airbus to do so. It was built to replace the Boeing 747. And please, today when we need to think about the environment. How could Airbus not make a plane similar to the B787? Besides, neither of them makes turboprop planes.
fachy1981 1 year ago 2
is it clean yet.
wesleyholt15 1 year ago
Coffee Machine :P
leathermodelcuir 1 year ago
Does Southwest wash both or one engine????
JakePeavyFan44 1 year ago
@JakePeavyFan44 one everytime it has rained!!
cessnaclub 1 year ago
As a passenger I´m concerned just about safety...until composite planes proves to be as reliable as Aluminum then I´ll be satisfied
Until now, and following B787´s development, it has all chances of being a new kind of Mass Destruction Weapon
Boeing had NOT performed any kind of Repetitive fatigue testing on 787´s Wings, nor measured the impact of the stresses the winbox will have to cope: that will lend to catastrophic cracking events as far as I´m concerned
fachy1981 1 year ago
@fachy1981 How would you know Boeing DIDN'T test anything. The A350 is still in development. And the 787 made it's first commercial flight to London. And the A350 looks like an exact copy of the 787 except the engines, and the livery.
TopGun904 1 year ago
@TopGun904 ...it doesnt matter that the A350 is still in development... the A380 was the big project in Europe while the 787 was being developed in the US... and now the A380 is up and running... look whos late to the party!! (B787) ... the A350 was not being developed at the same stage as the 787... and for good reason.
temanatahiti 1 year ago
@temanatahiti Airbus headquarters is in Europe dumb nut. Boeing is in Seattle...
Airbus thought that a bigger big-ass plane is better, just to show Boeing off with their 747. And fachy1981 started this whole thread when I just said, ''Hooray for the Boeing 737!''
TopGun904 1 year ago
@TopGun904 ... well done, the Airbus headquarters is indeed in Europe! Well done!! Jesus.And Boeing is actually headquartered in Chicago dumb-fuck... Airbus did not build the A380 just to size up to the Boeing 747... or else they would have built the A380 years ago?? Does that make sense to you?? They built the A380 in reply to market demands for larger aircraft for use on denser routes... Why do americans always feel threatened by Airbus? There is a whole other world outside the US you know.
temanatahiti 1 year ago
@TopGun904 ...and When I said 'Ever heard of EADS... they are headquartered in Europe'... I was refering to the parent company of Airbus.... dumb nut. EADS also owns a variety of companies who build spacecraft, the eurofighter, missiles, satelites etc.
temanatahiti 1 year ago
A380 rules in terms of comfort economy, technological advancements an most importantly the ability to generate profits for airlines. A380 clearly beats 747-8 in every category. It even performs better than they expected and Airbus are improving this all the time with weight saving advances. There is such a thing as being proud of Boeing, but using baseless lies and phony facts is appalling. I like all aircraft but you give credit where credit is due.
fachy1981 1 year ago
cool
spaceshipboy 1 year ago
Hooray for the Boeing 737.
TopGun904 1 year ago
@SkyWestCRJPilot Airbus is nothing more than a bunch of companies that had melted inside this pan-European consortium...some of them are older than Boeing...and even battled in WWII
Airbus is the PIONEER in aviation composites...Boeing had zero THAT´S WHY OUTSOURCED their 787 composite building (80%) out of America: Japanese composite Wings and centerframe, Italian composite fuselage, etc...
fachy1981 1 year ago
@fachy1981 Most American WWII planes were Lockheed Martin, which was bought by Boeing, and there isn't a commercial airliner that wasn't made without other countries help. Boeing and Airbus get their parts and assemble them in the 'assembly' plant. But even though Airbus wanted to think bigger is better that's why they made their big-ass A380, just to make a bigger plane than Boeing. Boeing had the right idea with the 787, people want luxury.
TopGun904 1 year ago
fachy1981 1 year ago
@fachy1981 Airbus is the one copying all Boeing's ideas, when the 747-400 came out, Airbus just wanted to show them off by making the A380. When the 787 came out, Airbus "built" the A350, also with wing curve from the 787! Btw, the A350 isn't even finished yet. And all WWII Bombers (B-17s) were Boeing!!
TopGun904 1 year ago
@fachy1981 The 787 has sold tons more than the A350... Like about, I dunno, 892 MORE orders!! Airbus sold only 300 of your XWB planes, and those are PRE-ORDERS, no one know how it will really perform. THE PLANE ISN'T EVEN FINISHED or made it FIRST takeoff!! And the 787 engines have a specially designed engine to reduce noise. As long as Airbus didn't copy that, I'm OK.
Boeing built 4/6 the Allied Forces WWII planes. The other 2/6 of the Allied Forces Were from other countries, and they mostly..
TopGun904 1 year ago
...The rest of the Allied Forces mostly used either US or British planes.
TopGun904 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TopGun904 Airbus 140 gross orders and 22 cancellations:118 net orders.
Boeing 129 gross orders and 89 cancellations=40 net orders.
Get your facts straight: Airbus overtook Boeing quite long ago, 2008 included , this year competition is missed: AIRBUS Monopolizes the market.
fachy1981 1 year ago
@TopGun904 Airbus 140 gross orders and 22 cancellations:118 net orders.
Boeing 129 gross orders and 89 cancellations=40 net orders.
Get your facts straight: Airbus overtook Boeing quite long ago, 2008 included , this year competition is missed: AIRBUS Monopolizes the market.
fachy1981 1 year ago
@fachy1981 Who's been the leading aircraft manufacturer for almost a century? Boeing.
TopGun904 1 year ago
@TopGun904 Boeing is now 10 years behind Airbus. Airlines that use the 747-400 will be looking to upgrade in the near future and it seems that A380 is the more popular choice. Airlines don't just want another 747 derivative. They want a completely new airliner.
Now with the delays of 787, it seems A350 will enter the market 2-3 years after 787 which should make for an interesting market. A350 can also take advantage of building second making A350 with slightly better technologies than 787.
fachy1981 1 year ago