Added: 3 months ago
From: papercraneproduction
Views: 3,268
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • can someone tell me if you have to destroy cards for this thanks

  • cool

  • Its seem like he just pull the card backwards.

  • I notice there IS a cover when you shrink the card, but there is none when you shake it back to its full size. Why have even minimal cover one way and none for the other. Why can't this be created in such a way to be able to be done with NO cover AT ALL in BOTH directions, the shrinking AND the growing? When that is developed, THEN I'll buy it.

  • @TheMatrix72370 you ll have to ask harry potter for the method

  • @Matzes I don't think so.

  • no.

  • Reminds me of something i saw in Art of Astonishment. Are you serious Papercrane?

  • @dontcallmeamagician your thinking of the effect found in book 2 called "the uncut version" where two half cards are placed on the deck then one of the cards passes through the other one and both visibly grow to full sized cards....as far as I can tell from the demo this is something entirely diff.

    JM

  • @enduremiller Hey Justin do you have to destroy cards for this. I'm thinking about purchasing this.

  • @365dayzofmagic no you do not have to destroy cards for this, there are many diff versions for this effect.

    JM

  • @enduremiller wow that was fast

    

  • @365dayzofmagic I care about magic!

    JM

  • @enduremiller Join the club and I think I'm going to have a heart attack because I'm actually talking with Justin Miller

  • Damnnnn...Nice!!:D

  • God, that's good.

  • cool... :D

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more