Pretty amazing stuff this guy can do with just some leverage. However some stones at Stonehenge actually weigh 40-50, opposed to the 10 ton stone this man moved, and were moved hundreds of miles. I don't think other megaliths such as the Carnac stones where over 3,000 stones, some weighing over 200 tons, are perfectly aligned into rows and geometric shapes 1000 to 2000 years before Stonehenge, can be explained so easily.
@bustatenkemo76 yesterdaylast was talking about that guy pivoting the blocks on smaller rocks which he never did on sand. He also never used the word "stones" so check yo self before you wreck yo self...douche. Also some of the stones at Stonehenge were moved from 200 miles away so on less they had a paved road I don't see that working
Oh WOW! Now that's one way to do it... Now if only we can figure out how the granite stones were shaped so precise... We'd have some of the ancient mystery solved!
@chachieb Think quicksand.... I dont know how to explain it scientifically, but the water turns the sand from solid to a liquid slurry... they can sink pylons for beach houses like this... if you dig deep enough near the coast the hole just fills itself in...
how did he make the pillars to begin with and then get it on the "teeter totter" to begin with. Why are all his experiments done on a flat cement surface. It doesnt prove anything to me. Get the blocks naturally and then move them on a natural surface. Thats what I want to see.
All you need to do is get it started on one side and that can be done with leverage. Get a small log under the one side and you can get something under the middle. Ancient people were smart and resourceful don't discount their achievements so easily. The stones themselves can be rolled into place by using logs and staging them forward each time one reaches then end. Now think of doing it with 500 men and you see that its not so far fetched.
@yesterdaylast ok first of all they are not stones... rarely you can find a stone this day that big.. its concreed ...second hes raising the concreed on sand ... the sand is a natural surface..
i want to see and update of this video
brunobliss 1 month ago
He has the most awesome name EVER! I bet he is awesome at hide and seek!
FangsShadow 3 months ago
Pretty amazing stuff this guy can do with just some leverage. However some stones at Stonehenge actually weigh 40-50, opposed to the 10 ton stone this man moved, and were moved hundreds of miles. I don't think other megaliths such as the Carnac stones where over 3,000 stones, some weighing over 200 tons, are perfectly aligned into rows and geometric shapes 1000 to 2000 years before Stonehenge, can be explained so easily.
dislexident 4 months ago
does anyone know, who is doing? Didi he bulild something bigger?
ValmisFilm 5 months ago
Wow, this guy is pretty smart. As good as any explanation about Stonehenge in my mind.
CndJim 8 months ago
@bustatenkemo76 yesterdaylast was talking about that guy pivoting the blocks on smaller rocks which he never did on sand. He also never used the word "stones" so check yo self before you wreck yo self...douche. Also some of the stones at Stonehenge were moved from 200 miles away so on less they had a paved road I don't see that working
kidyes 10 months ago
Oh WOW! Now that's one way to do it... Now if only we can figure out how the granite stones were shaped so precise... We'd have some of the ancient mystery solved!
ob1kanukie 1 year ago
not far fetched at all.
sinblesser 1 year ago
this is my grandpa
mrwallnea12 1 year ago
e x c e l l e n c e !
eligarf 1 year ago
can someone explain the washing the sand trick? I don't get how it works
chachieb 1 year ago
@chachieb Think quicksand.... I dont know how to explain it scientifically, but the water turns the sand from solid to a liquid slurry... they can sink pylons for beach houses like this... if you dig deep enough near the coast the hole just fills itself in...
jhr001 1 year ago
This guy is a genius
caveds 2 years ago 14
wally wallington
xBillyTheKidx 2 years ago
Interesting hobby. Moving heavy things, did he work with John Goodman?
kingofepic 2 years ago
Super cool indeed!
studiotx 2 years ago
how did he make the pillars to begin with and then get it on the "teeter totter" to begin with. Why are all his experiments done on a flat cement surface. It doesnt prove anything to me. Get the blocks naturally and then move them on a natural surface. Thats what I want to see.
yesterdaylast 2 years ago
Indeed, the need for a vey hard and flat surface kind of renders it useless for practical applications in pre history.
retepvosnul 2 years ago
All you need to do is get it started on one side and that can be done with leverage. Get a small log under the one side and you can get something under the middle. Ancient people were smart and resourceful don't discount their achievements so easily. The stones themselves can be rolled into place by using logs and staging them forward each time one reaches then end. Now think of doing it with 500 men and you see that its not so far fetched.
85Funkadelic 2 years ago 4
@yesterdaylast ok first of all they are not stones... rarely you can find a stone this day that big.. its concreed ...second hes raising the concreed on sand ... the sand is a natural surface..
bustatenkemo76 1 year ago
Where? I want to drive up to Flint and check this out. So cool!
fsjgw 2 years ago
THATS SUPER COOL
THREEFLOORSDOWN1 3 years ago