STAN JONES: Communist World Government

[InTheMidst1]

I'm not sure how this could be construed as COMMIE WORLD GOV"T when all the trade agreements are just that - trade agreements, monetary unity, and continental hwys. This sounds to me like Corptocracy (ie a type of fascism). If it were communism one would see the eradication, and deletion of corporations, increase in social programs (we see just the opposite in Norther America as social network is undermined)...clearly this is not communism but fascism.

[MrLibertyFighter]

TO ALL TRAITORS: YOU HAVE AWOKEN THE WRATH OF THE AMERICAN PATRIOT! THAT...WAS A HUGE MISTAKE!!!

Note: this is directed mostly towards the traitors in our government, but it certainly applies universally.

[ILUM69]

Sounds much more like a mix of a nazi state to me.

[BjornSeverinLarsen]

This is so weird. Communism is as old as the ancient Greeze, but it is allways comsidered to the same as Stalinism and Lenism - or even Marxism. Besides what he said was wrong. The constitutions or treaties have been changing gradually since the first one in 1993 was signed. The Lisbon Treaty was signed by the memberstates, however its predesesor was voted down by some member states. The Lisbon treaty was a rewrite which was signed by all memberstates after a second referendum.

[BjornSeverinLarsen]

@BjornSeverinLarsen The funny thing is, noone who uses the word communism in politics uses it's meaning. Communism means that the state owns all proberty. Communism isn't socialism, but the soviet union was a communist scoialistic dictatorship - these are are three things, not just one. But all you need to say these three things are to say communism, which is dishonest and misrepresentation. Free enterprise is just another word for, let ther rich get richer - to be continued

[BjornSeverinLarsen]

@BjornSeverinLarsen (part 2) It was the unbridled capitalism combined with no regulations which allowed the banks to gamble our money away for their own short term gain - the invisible hand that regulates the marked of supply and demand needs to have free reigns, which means about 60 to 70 % of a population needs to be poor, cos the wages needs to be low. The good thing is that it doesn't have to be this way, you can regulate the economy, in a way so that the majority of the populace isn't poor

[BjornSeverinLarsen]

@BjornSeverinLarsen (part 3) This however means that the state have to play a role in economics, and it need to regulate to keep back greedy selfish people. This is however allso the problem we stand with today - cos the state doesn't really function proberbly. Our democrazy isn't working cos there is no control mechanism of the polititians, we can't see what they really do. In the case of America both the democrats and the republicans are just as bad, so whats the choice really? Its all crap!!!

[theater1961]

fascism , totalitarianism, naziIsm, is communism...even islamocommunism! IT IS COMMUNISM WITH A CAPITAL C! THAT STANDS FOR CRAP, AND THAT RYHMES WITH DAP, AND THAT IS WHAT YOU WILL USE TO FILL YOUR CAVITIES IF THESE NUT-BALLS HAVE THEIR WAY, AND IF YOU DO THEN YOU WILL BE DEAD, CAUSE IT IS POISON TO YOUR HEAD, JUST LIKE COMMUNISM !

FREE ENTERPRISE !!!!!

THE WORLD IS PREPARING TO FLUSH THIS CRAP ONCE AND FOR ALL....!!

NOT THIS TIME BUCKO'S

[Hyperion121]

Tell me explain me what is exactly one world communist governement ?

[crazyforcanada]

@Hyperion121 - Hi. [1] For starters, it's when every nation has a virtually identical, or identical system and an elite group of self-appointed people who run it like dictators, according to collectivist ideology typical of a communist country. When nations are all different, and each country is typified by its own predominant race and culture with its own values, each nation's electorate makes laws according to its values.

[crazyforcanada]

@crazyforcanada - [2] @Hyperion121 - When a single value system is set up for all nations, there is appears to remove the 'need' for the electorate to VOTE to make laws according to their own values. A global system of 'values' is being imposed from central institutions such as the UN. One distinguishing feature of the current globally imposed 'value' system is that individual rights are subordinated to 'balancing', i.e., they can be limited or abrogated by government.

[crazyforcanada]

@Hyperion121 - [3] When this 'balancing system' is included in the Constitution of the country or in treaties adopted into domestic law so that the treaties override domestic law, the people LOSE THEIR RIGHTS tp self-govern whenever the global value system comes up for adjudication in a court. In other words, ONE idea, ONE value, is frozen in time and forced on everybody, and nobody can CHANGE it. It's one sign of the end of democracy. And of freedom of choice and opinion.

[crazyforcanada]

@Hyperion121 - [4] Finally, when the VALUES are all dictated, and they are collectivist values that are increasingly communist in nature, and your vote isn't required any more, then the other loss of personal sovereignty is that a group of self-appointed 'experts' decides ALONE how to use both your natural resources, ad your human resources. You end up not as a citizen of your self-governing nation, but a COG in a huge wheel, owned & operated by the state. Regards.

[Hyperion121]

@crazyforcanada

(1)

Thank you for the detailed information. But we can call this a global dictatorship, i dont see nothing that has a direct link with communism. Since a world governement impose their value to the mass exactly like a regional governement would do today, there is nothing distinct to communism has to capitalism. Also , according to comunism doctrine (wich was not alway like that in Real life) democracy has an important part in communism.

[crazyforcanada]

@Hyperion121 - we will not start to see heavy-duty communism until it's too late. They are sliding the infrastructures into place right now, and have been doing so for decades. They are quiet about it, they can't risk general public outrage. Once the infrastructures are in place, then the boot comes down. A high-tech Stalinist cyber-regime.

[manfries]

@Hyperion121 If you look at the Communist manifesto, it even says the way to destroy national soverienty and to enact victory is too support free trade. You won't see communism till the very end, when standards of living decrease

[Hyperion121]

@manfries

hummm I would be glad that you give a source of that, cauz i have the manifesto i have never read that. Actually it dosent make any sence. Free Trade is the unregulation of the market and the abolishion of all economic frontier. If you look in history, communist form of governement they close with their allies but they still have a very centralise economy that free trade would completely obliterate

So please, make me wrong i want a source from the manifesto.

thx

[Hyperion121]

@crazyforcanada

(2)

So has you can see , there is nothing link to communism or capitalism. Its just a way to impose a Dictatorship by a world governement. All dictatorship abolish democracy, manipulate the organisation of the states to a form of bureaucracy, uniformise the value of the majority by what the Head of the State dictate. I agree that this system will be the doom of humanity , but i cant call this Communism, especially in a time wich communism is condem.

Regards.

[crazyforcanada]

@Hyperion121 - you will be surprised to learn that communism isn't really condemned. If you look for articles by Charlotte Iserbyt at News with Views online, you will learn that there have been high-level former KGB introduced into the USA even under the Reagan administration, and into positions in Education, amongst others. US education has radically changed in the past few decades, it is less rigorous than it was, and kids are coming out of school ignorant of their Constitution.

[innHD]

See how the audience pokes fun at him like he speaks nonsense.

[crazyforcanada]

@innHD

First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.

Kathleen Moore

HABEAS CORPUS CANADA

The Official Legal Challenge

To North American Union

habeascorpuscanada [[[ dot ]]] com

[ClintfromNYtoVA]

The time lines have been pushed back and the names are changing but the plans are still the same. Check out the website I feature on my page for an update on the communist plot.

[SuperNewf1]

The Fascist's have used incrementalism to pervert our laws to suit their own ends. The people do not matter anymore. Educate the masses.

[pidner]

As the economy gets worse more people will start wising up as to whats going on,when thing are going good people dont pay attention,but when their pocketbooks start getting hit,more will seek information and find out that their rights have been stolen from them while they were asleep.

[2crazyforcanada]

And then, predictably, they'll RIOT, since they were braindead for generations. And when they riot, the POLICE STATE that has been put in place precisely in anticipation of this, will shift into action and the 800+ FEMA concentration camps on American soil that are staffed but waiting, will at last be fully occupied.

[pidner]

Thats right,but this old man and family will be far in the boondocks,everyone should have faith in God, a plan,and a backup or two,

[finefilth]

whatever happened to Stan Jones?

[2crazyforcanada]

The magic word is educate, the problem word is masses. How do you educate hundreds of millions of people in Canada-USA and elsewhere who have been deliberately stupidified for decades, and tauight WHAT to think, not HOW to think in our pathetic public schools.

[jetplane2006]

CHanging the laws for the objectives of murder, illegal detainment and enslavement can't really apply can they?

[crazyforcanada]

Look higher; don't look at laws being "apparently" made, look at who is claiming to make them. If there is discernably NO VALID OATH of office and allegiance under the lawful Constitution, whether of the USA or of Canada, or of England, for that matter, they are NOT IN OFFICE. We can use Quo Warranto in Canada, Habeas Corpus, and Section 9 of the British North America Act, 1867 to kick them out. Why are Americans so slow to impeach gross criminals? Why did they not get Bush for 9/11?