if i recall correctly this is stuff you learn at school more or less when you are 16-17 years old.... the person who made this video have some really big problem understanding trivial physics .....
SERIOUSLY. Does anyone understand the difference between a flow system where a CONSTANT force is APPLIED and a closed system where the force is only due to the brownian motion of the molecules of water? Of course when you apply a force the pressure will change due to a changed nozzle size P = F/A HOWEVER for a closed system the Force per unit area is Constant so the nozzle size is irrelevant as TFoot demonstrate. OMG retake GCSE physics please.
oh my... spoonfed by NF? wow, how ridiculous... yes, spoonfed... It clearly shows that you either misinterpreted the two formulas... or you just dont know the difference... shame, not that you didnt know, but that you went out of your way to re-post a video which is clearly wrong or deceptive.
I would take this down if I were you.. but hey, do your thing.
Thunderfoot seems to be saying that one jet will not flow further in space (distance) than the other. And he is right. Only he mistakenly used the word 'velocity' (speed) instead of distance. The one with the larger hole flows faster, but not further. This is due to the fact that the pressure is not constant- as the height of the water decreases, so does the pressure. So as since the pressure decreases faster in the bottle with larger hole, the distance of flow of both remain even. Try it!
You will find numerous Atheists with a thorough knowledge of the bible, church history and religious philosophy... who studied at renowned learning institutions (even Jesuit) ... who can more than ably speak to the flaws and inconsistencies of organized religion's assault on the scientific method. But it seems like every time I read or watch a religious apologist try to use science against science they make a complete ass of themselves. If God gave you humility, you gave yourself humiliation.
You still have this embarassment of a video up. Here, I'll do the first semester physics for you. To calculate the height of the water column: Force up = Force down. FU is Surface Area * Pressure. FD is Mass of water * gravity. Mass of water is Volume * density or Surface Area * Height * density. And there you have Surface Area as a linear factor on both sides of the equation. It cancels out. It does not matter. It increases force up and force down equally. Now apologize and bugger off.
Completely different system. Thunderfoot's system (and the one neph described in your water shooting out of the earth) are ones with a given pressure. The fire hose system does not. Not by a long shot. The pressure (and hence velocity) changes in this system to maintain flow rate.
Completely different system. Thunderfoot's system (and the one neph described in your water shooting out of the earth) are ones with a given pressure. The fire hose system does not. Not by a long shot. The pressure (and hence velocity) changes in this system to mantain flow rate.
The trouble is DebateCrusher, Nephlimfree censors literally everything. If you have a decent argument, you shouldnt have to censor what people write in a debate. I mearly asked Neph whether he had a degree, Just like that I was blocked!
Why block me for asking such a simple question? Perhaps you could ask him that.
Changing to a smaller nozzle tip will increase nozzle velocity / pressure!
Changing to a larger nozzle tip will decrease nozzle velocity / pressure!
The inverse relationship between velocity and nozzle size simply means that when one increases, the other decreases and vice versa. DER! Do you even need an experiment for that?
just because debatecrusher doesn't understand what thunderf00t was trying to teach doesn't mean thunderf00t is wrong. People see what they want to see. Stupidity makes my head hurt. Peace.
your opinion about length of water is poor evidence, since you're merely 'looking' without any precision in the measurements.
the 'Gravity' Fed water system is LIMITED to the Weight of the Water Volume, thus you CANNOT Increase Velocity by Reducing the hole/nozel size...this can Only occur in a Continuous Flow system, such as a hose or alike.
DebateCrusher > with all due respect, NephillimFree has blundered here and so have you for supporting his Incorrect analysis of the experiment that TF conducted.
Don't let your pride get in the way of Truth.
NephillimFree's application of that information was Incorrect with respect to TF demonstration because TF used a 'Constant Pressure' system and Not a 'Constant Flow' system.
take the video down, it's simply wrong and embarrassing.
@DebateRobo .. i'm said the velocity of the expelled fluid is the SAME for Both Nozels ie. big and small nozels because of the particular system.
this video is describing the change in velocity of the fluid in a 'constant flow' system which is not relevant to the 'thunderf00t' demonstration. hence, i said the video information is wrong.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@EvolutionLIE - While doing my water bottle experiments I noticed that there was a difference in how far water could travel given hole size. TF pulled a trick on you. I'll demonstrate it in my next video. You got snookered. I'll show you how. I can help.
@DebateCrusher ... the simple proof that what 'nephillimfree' said is incorrect, in particular, the statements that a smaller hole/nozel Increases Velocity is simply Untrue.
What you are suggesting is that be merely changing the hole size you can Increase the Velocity thus Pressue in a Gravity Fed system (ie. as described by TF).
If this Were True,you'd have a "Free Energy" Discovery !
Fact Is, Reducing Nozel size ONLY INcreases Velocity, thus Pressure in a Continuous Flow System ie.hose
Do you have this demonstration? - I'd love to see it. TF00t is supported by textbooks and mathematical models which correctly predict the results when I attempted the experiment. The 'Trick' he pulled appears to be called 'education', and I'm always willing to learn if you've found some way of debunking the physics I've spent years learning.
@DebateCrusher You really think a constant volume (with pressure being dynamic) and constant pressure (with volume being dynamic) are effectively that same type of systems in terms of outputs? I bet you didn't learn that one in an introductory physics class at college. Or high school.
@DebateCrusher Ok, for the sake of argument: the bottles have different nozzle velocities. Now PLEASE use this to prove god and/or a flood on the fucking moon!
GT35R is Correct "debatecrusher"....the equations and the references are relevant to a 'constant flow rate' system and Not a 'constant pressure system' as described by TF.
changing the nozel/hole size Effects the flow rate in a 'Constant Pressure system' however it does Not increase or decrease the Velocity of the flow.
the velocity is increased in a 'constant flow rate' system when the nozel is reduced in size, but this is Not what TF demonstrated.
Once all is said and done you have a fundamental issue here. The energy needed to eject the water to the required height of velocity simply is not there. Nozzle size can not compensate for the fact that the energy does not suffice for the job needed. Not to mention this is a constant pressure system so the nozzle size should not make a difference
Can somebody tell me why we are trying to debate water landing on the moon from earth? what does this have to do with creation vs unguided evolution. ?
Actually he does no physics. In a constant pressure system the per area pressure is the same. In other words your small or larger opening insures same pressure and since the opening determines the amount of fluid flowing out (in a constant pressure system) the Pressure/Area of opening ensures that the Force/ units of mass of water will be the same regardless of nozzle size.
He is also talking about an ideal system. Regardless the nozzle size does not effect the height of water
You'll have to forgive me for a moment. In Thunderf00t's demonstration, is the puncture in the water-bottle supposed to be considered the nozzle, or is the uncapped hole supposed to be?
No, the froze does not remain the same..it scales down because you just decreased the area. In this system the force is perpendicular to the container. You remove half the area, you remove half the force hence keeping pressure the same. You clearly do not know what you are talking about. Are you telling me I can make ultra cheap industrial water cutting instruments by just putting a tiny nozzle on my gardening hose?
Did you even take college physics? others ud kno beter
Most of the force is acting perpendicular to the container. Only the force that affect the area of the opening effects the velocity of expulsion; in this expample the force/area / unit of water is the same regardless of the opening. Thus same velocity.
If the force was constant, regardless of opening, then you would see similar flow rates in the two holes... but you don't. The larger hole empties faster. More force, more water to expel, same velocity.
@Toudiyama - Thunderfoot hasn't been responding to many of his critics on many issues. It's just that one gets the feeling that TF really has no arguments to argue.
It really does not matter if I was right or wrong about nozzle size. The problem with this proposal is that the amount of energy needed to propel the water just is not there. Nozzle size can never make up for the insufficient energy.
@GT35R - I pointed out this video not to point out anything about propelling water through outerspace, but to show that TF didn't know his physics. And this video certainly did the job.
@weseyedwalk neph is stating that this provides proof that the flood is in fact possible so it really has nothing to do with creation or evolution BUT does involve an event in the Bible
OMFSM TF demonstrates what he is saying, and nephy tries to refute science by picking from article by a retired fireman those thing that when taken out of context seem to concur with him, amd you think TF should make a rebuttal
let Nephilimfree first DEMONSTRATE that what he says can actually happen
Misinterpreting some java animation is not demonstrating
You just crushed the debate by showing not nrphy nor you do not undersdtand science
@Toudiyama - actually that's false. TF didn't demonstrate anything. He didn't have a good view of the bottles so you couldn't actually see how far the streams were traveling.
@Toudiyama - actually it doesn't matter if the man was retired or not. Because he gave the math equations to determine that nozzle, contrary to what TA thinks, does matter.
@GT35R - not trying to argue that water will leave that high. The point in my bringing this video to mirror is just to prove that a nozzle size does matter and that TF doesn't know physics.
@DebateRobo people have told him (NF) that that does not apply to a constant pressure system, this somehow doesn't get into nephy's thick skull and therefore he come up with a constant flow system and thinks he can apply this to his lunar bukake idea
@EvolutionLIE Plumbing isn't a constant pressure system. If it were, you couldn't get better water pressure by using narrower pipes, because...eh hem...the pressure would be constant!
@EvolutionLIE "It is Retarded to Claim, as TF did, that the Flow Rate Changes !"
So, it would be safe to assume, that you believe a bucket with a forty cm hole in the bottom will drain at the same rate as a bucket with a 1 cm hole?
The pressure isn't changing from one bucket to the next. P = F / A F = m * a
@EvolutionLIE So, then you do believe they will drain at the same rate.
I vs. V is a great analogy! If you had a constant current source (constant flow rate), you could continue to attach resistors in series and the current through them would always be the same. If you had a battery, a constant voltage source (constant pressure), the current would change with each resistor.
OMG are you kidding me? Do you understand the difference between a constant pressure system and a constant flow system? In constant flow (like a fire truck) systems the nozzle size will make a difference otherwise it wont. Have any of you guys who promote neph taken any physics in your life?
If it was as easy as just changing the nozzle size than we could have cheap industrial strength water cutting instruments. You guys expect nozzle size to violate conservation of energy?
still waiting for you to crush a debate. Besides there are several issues with Nephs arguement beyond what has been stated. 1 he has yet to demonstrate in math how much pressure would be needed to get water to escape velocity.
the 2nd problem is Volume. For the Earth to be completely flooded we would need roughly 3x the volume of water then is present in the ocean to reach the highest peak on earth. If neph says this water was under the earth then was the earth larger in volume prior to the flood? there was enough water under the surface to flood the entire world , Make craters on the moon and all the asteroids?
@nessik13 - I don't support NephilimFree. In fact we had a bad exchange in pms early on. And I have never seen all his videos. I just posted this video because TF never answered it but just put out a personal attack video about aliens and NF's prayer life. I support ideas. If TF had a good idea I would support it. Doesn't matter who the person is. I do what I want. I'm not peer pressure oriented.
What I would like to see from Nephilimfree is the math of how much pressure was needed to eject water onto the moon and how much would have been on the earth in the first place. If he wants the scientific community to take him seriously, then he should do some math, not simply quote an incredible simple math equation for 5 minutes straight.
I have tried Tf00ts experiment using one bottle with two different size holes, the smaller je goes further,so as far as nozzle velocity goes, Neph may be right. BUT, if you think that this an anyway supports Nephs idiotic theory that water squirted out of the earth and landed on the moon then you're just as much a fantasist as him.
You may think this discredits Tf00t, and he may indeed be wrong on this, but at least he isn't wrong EVERYTIME like Neph.
Dude....you learn this stuff when you are 17 years old or in first year off college. GO EDUCATE YOURSELF!!!!
luar48 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Hi. Please take a fluid dynamics class. Good bye.
mgt247 6 months ago
if i recall correctly this is stuff you learn at school more or less when you are 16-17 years old.... the person who made this video have some really big problem understanding trivial physics .....
obliuraschi 6 months ago
Damn you are stupid. Go pray, sheep.
bary1234 7 months ago
SERIOUSLY. Does anyone understand the difference between a flow system where a CONSTANT force is APPLIED and a closed system where the force is only due to the brownian motion of the molecules of water? Of course when you apply a force the pressure will change due to a changed nozzle size P = F/A HOWEVER for a closed system the Force per unit area is Constant so the nozzle size is irrelevant as TFoot demonstrate. OMG retake GCSE physics please.
QuantumOverlord 8 months ago
This is just silly. Thunderfoot demonstrated using a gravity fed system and your comparing it to a pump/pressure fed system. Nice LOLGIC
brewerbrian420 8 months ago
oh my... spoonfed by NF? wow, how ridiculous... yes, spoonfed... It clearly shows that you either misinterpreted the two formulas... or you just dont know the difference... shame, not that you didnt know, but that you went out of your way to re-post a video which is clearly wrong or deceptive.
I would take this down if I were you.. but hey, do your thing.
turtle5181 8 months ago
wow. this is still up after the intellectual beat down he gave you?!
lennyhipp 8 months ago
Thunderfoot seems to be saying that one jet will not flow further in space (distance) than the other. And he is right. Only he mistakenly used the word 'velocity' (speed) instead of distance. The one with the larger hole flows faster, but not further. This is due to the fact that the pressure is not constant- as the height of the water decreases, so does the pressure. So as since the pressure decreases faster in the bottle with larger hole, the distance of flow of both remain even. Try it!
AgentSpikeLongskin 8 months ago
Does it occur to anyone that the argument here is over some ignoramus' delusional nonsense?
fdasherv 8 months ago
You will find numerous Atheists with a thorough knowledge of the bible, church history and religious philosophy... who studied at renowned learning institutions (even Jesuit) ... who can more than ably speak to the flaws and inconsistencies of organized religion's assault on the scientific method. But it seems like every time I read or watch a religious apologist try to use science against science they make a complete ass of themselves. If God gave you humility, you gave yourself humiliation.
Murchad99 9 months ago
Wow, just wow. I mean holy shit. Wow.
MonochromaticEarth 9 months ago
You still have this embarassment of a video up. Here, I'll do the first semester physics for you. To calculate the height of the water column: Force up = Force down. FU is Surface Area * Pressure. FD is Mass of water * gravity. Mass of water is Volume * density or Surface Area * Height * density. And there you have Surface Area as a linear factor on both sides of the equation. It cancels out. It does not matter. It increases force up and force down equally. Now apologize and bugger off.
TerrencePhillip66 9 months ago
Completely different system. Thunderfoot's system (and the one neph described in your water shooting out of the earth) are ones with a given pressure. The fire hose system does not. Not by a long shot. The pressure (and hence velocity) changes in this system to maintain flow rate.
Shrubbist 10 months ago
Completely different system. Thunderfoot's system (and the one neph described in your water shooting out of the earth) are ones with a given pressure. The fire hose system does not. Not by a long shot. The pressure (and hence velocity) changes in this system to mantain flow rate.
Shrubbist 10 months ago
The trouble is DebateCrusher, Nephlimfree censors literally everything. If you have a decent argument, you shouldnt have to censor what people write in a debate. I mearly asked Neph whether he had a degree, Just like that I was blocked!
Why block me for asking such a simple question? Perhaps you could ask him that.
QuantumOverlord 1 year ago
Those people just need to use buckets. Don't build anything that has to do with velocity PLEASE!
purpleorchid76 1 year ago
Changing to a smaller nozzle tip will increase nozzle velocity / pressure!
Changing to a larger nozzle tip will decrease nozzle velocity / pressure!
The inverse relationship between velocity and nozzle size simply means that when one increases, the other decreases and vice versa. DER! Do you even need an experiment for that?
purpleorchid76 1 year ago
this should be put on why people laugh at creationist.
Th0usandMaster 1 year ago
Hi, I am currently writing a books on pump and valve mechanics. Sorry, Thunderf00t was dead on and Nephilimfree was way wrong.
JaysLogic 1 year ago 12
NF fails again to understand the disparity, and so have you, "DebateCrusher". You fail physics. Bye
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
just because debatecrusher doesn't understand what thunderf00t was trying to teach doesn't mean thunderf00t is wrong. People see what they want to see. Stupidity makes my head hurt. Peace.
slx081 1 year ago
Neph makes a video copying your style, then you copy his video to make this one. There's some beautiful symmetry here.
DanMickie 1 year ago
*by* merely changing the hole size....etc.
your opinion about length of water is poor evidence, since you're merely 'looking' without any precision in the measurements.
the 'Gravity' Fed water system is LIMITED to the Weight of the Water Volume, thus you CANNOT Increase Velocity by Reducing the hole/nozel size...this can Only occur in a Continuous Flow system, such as a hose or alike.
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
DebateCrusher > with all due respect, NephillimFree has blundered here and so have you for supporting his Incorrect analysis of the experiment that TF conducted.
Don't let your pride get in the way of Truth.
NephillimFree's application of that information was Incorrect with respect to TF demonstration because TF used a 'Constant Pressure' system and Not a 'Constant Flow' system.
take the video down, it's simply wrong and embarrassing.
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago 12
@EvolutionLIE - with all due respect you're wrong. How so? Because a barrel if big enough is a relatively constant pressure system.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@DebateRobo .. i'm said the velocity of the expelled fluid is the SAME for Both Nozels ie. big and small nozels because of the particular system.
this video is describing the change in velocity of the fluid in a 'constant flow' system which is not relevant to the 'thunderf00t' demonstration. hence, i said the video information is wrong.
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@EvolutionLIE - While doing my water bottle experiments I noticed that there was a difference in how far water could travel given hole size. TF pulled a trick on you. I'll demonstrate it in my next video. You got snookered. I'll show you how. I can help.
DebateCrusher 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher ... the simple proof that what 'nephillimfree' said is incorrect, in particular, the statements that a smaller hole/nozel Increases Velocity is simply Untrue.
What you are suggesting is that be merely changing the hole size you can Increase the Velocity thus Pressue in a Gravity Fed system (ie. as described by TF).
If this Were True,you'd have a "Free Energy" Discovery !
Fact Is, Reducing Nozel size ONLY INcreases Velocity, thus Pressure in a Continuous Flow System ie.hose
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher
Do you have this demonstration? - I'd love to see it. TF00t is supported by textbooks and mathematical models which correctly predict the results when I attempted the experiment. The 'Trick' he pulled appears to be called 'education', and I'm always willing to learn if you've found some way of debunking the physics I've spent years learning.
AjnaKotobide 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher You really think a constant volume (with pressure being dynamic) and constant pressure (with volume being dynamic) are effectively that same type of systems in terms of outputs? I bet you didn't learn that one in an introductory physics class at college. Or high school.
TerrencePhillip66 1 year ago
@DebateCrusher Ok, for the sake of argument: the bottles have different nozzle velocities. Now PLEASE use this to prove god and/or a flood on the fucking moon!
fdasherv 8 months ago
@DebateCrusher Go on Debate crusher, Im keen for you to prove the very foundations of physics wrong, obviously you can't.
QuantumOverlord 8 months ago
GT35R is Correct "debatecrusher"....the equations and the references are relevant to a 'constant flow rate' system and Not a 'constant pressure system' as described by TF.
changing the nozel/hole size Effects the flow rate in a 'Constant Pressure system' however it does Not increase or decrease the Velocity of the flow.
the velocity is increased in a 'constant flow rate' system when the nozel is reduced in size, but this is Not what TF demonstrated.
with all due respect remove the video
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
Once all is said and done you have a fundamental issue here. The energy needed to eject the water to the required height of velocity simply is not there. Nozzle size can not compensate for the fact that the energy does not suffice for the job needed. Not to mention this is a constant pressure system so the nozzle size should not make a difference
GT35R 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
does stuttering change the velocity of his fallacies?
9pt9 1 year ago
Well it's nice to see you again. Were have you been the last couple of months?
N00bcrunch3r 1 year ago
Can somebody tell me why we are trying to debate water landing on the moon from earth? what does this have to do with creation vs unguided evolution. ?
weseyedwalk 1 year ago
@weseyedwalk - I'm not arguing whether or not water can land on the moon. I featured this video because it shows that TF doesn't know science.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@DebateRobo
Actually he does no physics. In a constant pressure system the per area pressure is the same. In other words your small or larger opening insures same pressure and since the opening determines the amount of fluid flowing out (in a constant pressure system) the Pressure/Area of opening ensures that the Force/ units of mass of water will be the same regardless of nozzle size.
He is also talking about an ideal system. Regardless the nozzle size does not effect the height of water
GT35R 1 year ago
@GT35R
You'll have to forgive me for a moment. In Thunderf00t's demonstration, is the puncture in the water-bottle supposed to be considered the nozzle, or is the uncapped hole supposed to be?
Ephemerance 1 year ago
@Ephemerance
The puncture
GT35R 1 year ago
@GT35R
So Thunderf00t was incorrect in his demonstration?
Ephemerance 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE
"clearly you don't comprehend the equation to ask such a question."
You're partly right. I didn't understand what Thunderf00t was trying to convey with his demonstration. I was looking for clarification.
"thunderf00t's an idiot"
I think egocentric bully is the apt description - but that's beside the point.
Ephemerance 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE
No, the froze does not remain the same..it scales down because you just decreased the area. In this system the force is perpendicular to the container. You remove half the area, you remove half the force hence keeping pressure the same. You clearly do not know what you are talking about. Are you telling me I can make ultra cheap industrial water cutting instruments by just putting a tiny nozzle on my gardening hose?
Did you even take college physics? others ud kno beter
GT35R 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE
Most of the force is acting perpendicular to the container. Only the force that affect the area of the opening effects the velocity of expulsion; in this expample the force/area / unit of water is the same regardless of the opening. Thus same velocity.
If the force was constant, regardless of opening, then you would see similar flow rates in the two holes... but you don't. The larger hole empties faster. More force, more water to expel, same velocity.
GT35R 1 year ago
@GT35R ... you're right
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE reads like your just telling him he is right, to make him stop replying to you
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama - Thunderfoot hasn't been responding to many of his critics on many issues. It's just that one gets the feeling that TF really has no arguments to argue.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE
It really does not matter if I was right or wrong about nozzle size. The problem with this proposal is that the amount of energy needed to propel the water just is not there. Nozzle size can never make up for the insufficient energy.
GT35R 1 year ago
@GT35R - I pointed out this video not to point out anything about propelling water through outerspace, but to show that TF didn't know his physics. And this video certainly did the job.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@DebateRobo
No, TF was right. Nozzle size is not a factor in this circumstance.
GT35R 1 year ago
@GT35R - Oh? the math equation proves that nozzle size does matter.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@GT35R ..that's true.
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@weseyedwalk neph is stating that this provides proof that the flood is in fact possible so it really has nothing to do with creation or evolution BUT does involve an event in the Bible
evewale 1 year ago
OMFSM TF demonstrates what he is saying, and nephy tries to refute science by picking from article by a retired fireman those thing that when taken out of context seem to concur with him, amd you think TF should make a rebuttal
let Nephilimfree first DEMONSTRATE that what he says can actually happen
Misinterpreting some java animation is not demonstrating
You just crushed the debate by showing not nrphy nor you do not undersdtand science
Toudiyama 1 year ago 2
@Toudiyama - actually that's false. TF didn't demonstrate anything. He didn't have a good view of the bottles so you couldn't actually see how far the streams were traveling.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@DebateRobo other have done simular experiment and all show the same results
nephy has never ever done any experiment period
Toudiyama 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@Toudiyama - You must be crazy. TF didn't demonstrate anything. The view of the bottles wasn't good enough.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@Toudiyama - actually it doesn't matter if the man was retired or not. Because he gave the math equations to determine that nozzle, contrary to what TA thinks, does matter.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@DebateRobo in a constant flow system which can not be used for a consyant pressure system like nephy.s
Toudiyama 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This blows me away that you people don't understand why you are wrong.
sweatytoothmadman 1 year ago
@sweatytoothmadman who are you people?
Toudiyama 1 year ago
Sorry I didn't really say, I mean Nephys little fan base.
sweatytoothmadman 1 year ago
@sweatytoothmadman then I hit the no spam button right
Toudiyama 1 year ago
The energy just is not there to propel the water that high. It is as simple as thought. Nozzle size will never make up for the lack of energy
GT35R 1 year ago
@GT35R - not trying to argue that water will leave that high. The point in my bringing this video to mirror is just to prove that a nozzle size does matter and that TF doesn't know physics.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
@DebateRobo people have told him (NF) that that does not apply to a constant pressure system, this somehow doesn't get into nephy's thick skull and therefore he come up with a constant flow system and thinks he can apply this to his lunar bukake idea
And this person calls others unifomitationist
Toudiyama 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE Plumbing isn't a constant pressure system. If it were, you couldn't get better water pressure by using narrower pipes, because...eh hem...the pressure would be constant!
ThePickyNancy 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EvolutionLIE "It is Retarded to Claim, as TF did, that the Flow Rate Changes !"
So, it would be safe to assume, that you believe a bucket with a forty cm hole in the bottom will drain at the same rate as a bucket with a 1 cm hole?
The pressure isn't changing from one bucket to the next. P = F / A F = m * a
ThePickyNancy 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE So, then you do believe they will drain at the same rate.
I vs. V is a great analogy! If you had a constant current source (constant flow rate), you could continue to attach resistors in series and the current through them would always be the same. If you had a battery, a constant voltage source (constant pressure), the current would change with each resistor.
ThePickyNancy 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
@EvolutionLIE So, you think "increases" is a good word to describe the behavior of something that is constant?
ThePickyNancy 1 year ago
Comment removed
EvolutionLIE 1 year ago
OMG are you kidding me? Do you understand the difference between a constant pressure system and a constant flow system? In constant flow (like a fire truck) systems the nozzle size will make a difference otherwise it wont. Have any of you guys who promote neph taken any physics in your life?
If it was as easy as just changing the nozzle size than we could have cheap industrial strength water cutting instruments. You guys expect nozzle size to violate conservation of energy?
GT35R 1 year ago
still waiting for you to crush a debate. Besides there are several issues with Nephs arguement beyond what has been stated. 1 he has yet to demonstrate in math how much pressure would be needed to get water to escape velocity.
nessik13 1 year ago
@nessik13
the 2nd problem is Volume. For the Earth to be completely flooded we would need roughly 3x the volume of water then is present in the ocean to reach the highest peak on earth. If neph says this water was under the earth then was the earth larger in volume prior to the flood? there was enough water under the surface to flood the entire world , Make craters on the moon and all the asteroids?
nessik13 1 year ago
@nessik13
Really supporting neph is not helping your crushing reputation.
nessik13 1 year ago
@nessik13 - I don't support NephilimFree. In fact we had a bad exchange in pms early on. And I have never seen all his videos. I just posted this video because TF never answered it but just put out a personal attack video about aliens and NF's prayer life. I support ideas. If TF had a good idea I would support it. Doesn't matter who the person is. I do what I want. I'm not peer pressure oriented.
DebateRobo 1 year ago
What I would like to see from Nephilimfree is the math of how much pressure was needed to eject water onto the moon and how much would have been on the earth in the first place. If he wants the scientific community to take him seriously, then he should do some math, not simply quote an incredible simple math equation for 5 minutes straight.
jeesh....
orge121 1 year ago
@orge121 I'd like to see him do any math.
ThePickyNancy 1 year ago
I have tried Tf00ts experiment using one bottle with two different size holes, the smaller je goes further,so as far as nozzle velocity goes, Neph may be right. BUT, if you think that this an anyway supports Nephs idiotic theory that water squirted out of the earth and landed on the moon then you're just as much a fantasist as him.
You may think this discredits Tf00t, and he may indeed be wrong on this, but at least he isn't wrong EVERYTIME like Neph.
wordavee 1 year ago
TF and many others have answered all of Neph's inane arguments, are you too lazy to view those videos?
DialecticKaos 1 year ago
don't tell me you are taking nephi's side here? he is CREARLY in the wrong (if you want, I can explain it pretty well too).
eyallev 1 year ago