@AntiMilitary I do however encourage you to seek out other propeace reasearch as you seem to be doing. In that spirit, might I recommend you try contacting a Dr. Rick Trebino founder of F.R.O.G. (Frequency Resolved Optical Gating). Though he is a lethal laser physicsist, he actually anti-war and refuse to allow his technology to be use by the D.O.D. Although you might not realize it, FROG is a program that revolutionizes secure and secretive communication to- well just wiki the term F.R.O.G.
@AntiMilitary Infact, I find one of the most compeling reason for the grey goo rule out was the simple temperature and more importantly pressure requirements for carbon nanotubes and graphene. You either need a high power laser at standard presure that can reach about 2800 K or need to create a vaccum 1/100 the vaccum in space at 1200 K to grow high quality effective carbon nanotubes. By high quality I mean the kind used to run processors and machines.
@AntiMilitary ... basically between 30% - 50% the nonlethal stinky gas would hit not only allies but actually the person who deployed it and the person right next to them. Since then most air born nanoweapons have been scraped and only really come up complete not-fact-based novels like Prey by Michael Crichton. In fact, on a related note most grey goo nanomachines were ruled out in 2006 based on the rules of physics behind nanotechnology.
@AntiMilitary Actually this wind turblence is a well known factor in weather, but if you don't believe me just ask famous physicsist Dr. Michael Schatz who made many empirical break throughs in solving the Navier Stokes equations when dealing with such turblence. Becuase nanoparticles are massless the can travel very fair. Much like a simple cough travels 15 m. Now I am guessing your not a physic major so to make a long story sort ...
@AntiMilitary the most famous of these was a nonlethal strain, that was effectively the mother of all stink bombs. Imagine a stink bomb created from nanoparticles that is so powerful to our sense of smell that it literally can incapacitate a person for up to 12 hours and then allow you to track them for up to 7 years. The problem with this airborne nanoweapons. Well it turns out that like chemical warfare of WWII you cannot really control effectively and safely due to local wind turblence.
@AntiMilitary actually I have a friend who works in this field. First off the nanoparticles they talk about that may cause cell damage is not 100% and mostly due to cross correlation studies. Second there are a couple of famous R5 project involving nanochemicals who statistical failures pretty much pave the road against Rfid particles being used as nanoair streams. The most famous of these was a nonlethal strain ....
go to save holy sites dot com to know the truth about end-time subjects, Elenin, apophis, and Earth disaster(s) researched by trained researcher, get encouragement, submit prayer request for life, get the only facts on how to survive and see the day after. at my holy house dot com see videos on this topic, documentaries, pics, encouragements how various wars, i.e. Israel mid east, China factor in with U.S. policy and politics, news reports on most come now, choose life!
Wow.. this was a pile of garbage.. nowhere is rfid mentioned in the video. It just says that there CAN be damage to cells due to use of nano-particles.
I agree that there is reason to be a bit sceptical, that is just common sense, but to never trust the industry, that is a bit extreme in my opinion. By the way, which industry are you talking about?
Nano technology is a racket.The history of nano technology proves the interface-formula that enables nano technology wasn't known until 2005.They stole it and tried to Strawman it by crediting Erick Drexler as "The Father of Nanotechnology" Then began researching the formula and discovering new nano scale facts that were all patented since 1999.Erick Drexler only had a Strawman no formula. Nanotechnology is UFT is it not?If Einstein couldn't solve his own UFT then who did?They never told anyone
@pbspecops Hopefully kill off 87% of the moronic idiot population and change the DNA of the remaining 13 to become superbeings! Fuck the average moron! They deserve to die!
@LadyStonecut Some say chemtrails are a way of plasmafying the skies in order to use HAARP and EISCAT more effectively to control the weather and our brainwaves.
Why would anyone poison the very air they breathe in themselves. HUH?
@A55ma57er Good question. I asked that myself. Especially since there have been alleged implications regarding nanno particulates and Morgellons in the lungs. The only answer I could think of is that they would have something for themselves to counteract the effects. Lots of questions and few answers.
@A55ma57er But seeing all these chemtrails planes all over the world (for instance i live in Norway in a small town in the middle of nowhere and i see 3-4 of them every day), in ever spot... there had to be a massive vaccination programme for this. Someone's BOUND to speak!
I don't disagree with the fact that there are chemtrails and contrails but i think they're doing something to the atmosphere. Noticed any massive earthquakes or climate changes lately?
l wonder if colliodal silver intrudes on their RFID,they'll be saying to ban the colliodal silver.next because it clears the crap they throw around.
creations78 3 months ago
@AntiMilitary I do however encourage you to seek out other propeace reasearch as you seem to be doing. In that spirit, might I recommend you try contacting a Dr. Rick Trebino founder of F.R.O.G. (Frequency Resolved Optical Gating). Though he is a lethal laser physicsist, he actually anti-war and refuse to allow his technology to be use by the D.O.D. Although you might not realize it, FROG is a program that revolutionizes secure and secretive communication to- well just wiki the term F.R.O.G.
dusky186 6 months ago
@AntiMilitary Infact, I find one of the most compeling reason for the grey goo rule out was the simple temperature and more importantly pressure requirements for carbon nanotubes and graphene. You either need a high power laser at standard presure that can reach about 2800 K or need to create a vaccum 1/100 the vaccum in space at 1200 K to grow high quality effective carbon nanotubes. By high quality I mean the kind used to run processors and machines.
dusky186 6 months ago
@AntiMilitary ... basically between 30% - 50% the nonlethal stinky gas would hit not only allies but actually the person who deployed it and the person right next to them. Since then most air born nanoweapons have been scraped and only really come up complete not-fact-based novels like Prey by Michael Crichton. In fact, on a related note most grey goo nanomachines were ruled out in 2006 based on the rules of physics behind nanotechnology.
dusky186 6 months ago
@AntiMilitary Actually this wind turblence is a well known factor in weather, but if you don't believe me just ask famous physicsist Dr. Michael Schatz who made many empirical break throughs in solving the Navier Stokes equations when dealing with such turblence. Becuase nanoparticles are massless the can travel very fair. Much like a simple cough travels 15 m. Now I am guessing your not a physic major so to make a long story sort ...
dusky186 6 months ago
@AntiMilitary the most famous of these was a nonlethal strain, that was effectively the mother of all stink bombs. Imagine a stink bomb created from nanoparticles that is so powerful to our sense of smell that it literally can incapacitate a person for up to 12 hours and then allow you to track them for up to 7 years. The problem with this airborne nanoweapons. Well it turns out that like chemical warfare of WWII you cannot really control effectively and safely due to local wind turblence.
dusky186 6 months ago
@AntiMilitary actually I have a friend who works in this field. First off the nanoparticles they talk about that may cause cell damage is not 100% and mostly due to cross correlation studies. Second there are a couple of famous R5 project involving nanochemicals who statistical failures pretty much pave the road against Rfid particles being used as nanoair streams. The most famous of these was a nonlethal strain ....
dusky186 6 months ago
go to save holy sites dot com to know the truth about end-time subjects, Elenin, apophis, and Earth disaster(s) researched by trained researcher, get encouragement, submit prayer request for life, get the only facts on how to survive and see the day after. at my holy house dot com see videos on this topic, documentaries, pics, encouragements how various wars, i.e. Israel mid east, China factor in with U.S. policy and politics, news reports on most come now, choose life!
annted777 6 months ago
Wow.. this was a pile of garbage.. nowhere is rfid mentioned in the video. It just says that there CAN be damage to cells due to use of nano-particles.
Jarleboy 9 months ago
@Jarleboy see the other vids and you'll understand that these nano-particles may work as Smart Dust/ rfid.
But this video is in itself proof enough to never trust the industry of course!
AntiMilitary 9 months ago
@AntiMilitary
Of course, you say? Please elaborate.
I agree that there is reason to be a bit sceptical, that is just common sense, but to never trust the industry, that is a bit extreme in my opinion. By the way, which industry are you talking about?
Jarleboy 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nano technology is a racket.The history of nano technology proves the interface-formula that enables nano technology wasn't known until 2005.They stole it and tried to Strawman it by crediting Erick Drexler as "The Father of Nanotechnology" Then began researching the formula and discovering new nano scale facts that were all patented since 1999.Erick Drexler only had a Strawman no formula. Nanotechnology is UFT is it not?If Einstein couldn't solve his own UFT then who did?They never told anyone
princeadeshoga 9 months ago
the purpose IS to change our DNS or kill us.
pbspecops 11 months ago
@pbspecops Hopefully kill off 87% of the moronic idiot population and change the DNA of the remaining 13 to become superbeings! Fuck the average moron! They deserve to die!
A55ma57er 9 months ago
Adding them to chemtrails? Damaging DNA, creating the perfect surviellance antenna ?
LadyStonecut 1 year ago
@LadyStonecut Some say chemtrails are a way of plasmafying the skies in order to use HAARP and EISCAT more effectively to control the weather and our brainwaves.
Why would anyone poison the very air they breathe in themselves. HUH?
A55ma57er 9 months ago
@A55ma57er Good question. I asked that myself. Especially since there have been alleged implications regarding nanno particulates and Morgellons in the lungs. The only answer I could think of is that they would have something for themselves to counteract the effects. Lots of questions and few answers.
LadyStonecut 9 months ago
@A55ma57er But seeing all these chemtrails planes all over the world (for instance i live in Norway in a small town in the middle of nowhere and i see 3-4 of them every day), in ever spot... there had to be a massive vaccination programme for this. Someone's BOUND to speak!
I don't disagree with the fact that there are chemtrails and contrails but i think they're doing something to the atmosphere. Noticed any massive earthquakes or climate changes lately?
A55ma57er 9 months ago